(updated below 6/4, 6/6)
I won't get into a "tit for tat" waste of time, but do wish to demonstrate their continued campaign of falsehoods and defamation with no basis OTHER than to defame me.
July 7: This woman and "friends" claim that the FBI is investigating me, and that she has been specifically "told" things by the Texas FBI about "the investigation" against me.
Her exact words just from yesterday July 6: "The FBI in Texas and law enforcement in California have told me they believe I am a victim of persistent crimes ... ****** & Rob say they're not criminals because they haven't been convicted of a crime. The FBI told me, one becomes a criminal when they commit a crime."
I decided to call the Austin Field office of the FBI. The Duty Agent told me that FBI policy will of course not confirm nor deny that I am actually under investigation, BUT he was emphatic that the FBI policy is equally strict that they NEVER contact anyone who made a complaint (other than for information, but will NEVER even disclose they are investigating or not) and they NEVER EVER discuss ANY investigation with ANYONE, not even the original person who made the complaint. They CERTAINLY would never say the things this woman claims the FBI "told her" His exact words were "the fact she says the FBI has confirmed or discussed anything with her of the alleged investigation is strong evidence that she is simply not credible." He also said that if there "were" an investigation about me that I "probably would have heard something from them." He said may people file complaints with the FBI which are judged "not credible" and are never acted upon. The mere fact she "may" have filed a complaint does not mean that the FBI would actually conduct an investigation. The most likely scenario is that the FBI did nothing with her "complaint" (if she even did file one) as either not being credible or a waste of their time.
This is not the first time she and "friends" publicly accused me of being investigated by Law Enforcement. Over two years ago, they said publicly that I was "being investigated" by the Texas Attorney General's Office for "crimes". I went down to the AG's office and asked. They replied in writing that NO COMPLAINTS had been filed against me.
December 7, 2004 she said on her own "forum" on the web "I want justice and I am glad that I've been vindicated in the eyes of the law enforcement people I talked to today." "And after the facts have been proved, then the legal system will have the evidence it needs to go after the criminal aspects." Nothing ever happened, still after four years no "investigations" no "charges", nothing.
June 5, 2005 again on her own "forum" on the net: "we have massive overwhelming proof, that our lawyers say is enough that the judge will most likely put Rob in jail for a spell " NOTHING happened. No "charges", no "investigations", NOTHING happened other than plastering these claims on the internet.
Sound familiar to the current "allegations"? It is now almost 4 years, but nothing from "law enforcement" has ever actually come up, despite lots of writing on the internet about "imminent" investigations and "charges" but nothing ever happens. As the FBI said to me "this is strong evidence that the person making these claims is simply not credible."
This woman claimed publicly to have "witnesses" to support her allegations. During litigation she was compelled to provide me a list of these "witnesses". She provided exactly two names with addresses but no phone numbers, one address was in England. Investigation proved that NEITHER PERSON existed and the "addresses" she provided were bogus. Are her current claims of these same allegations credible as a result?
Do you see the ongoing pattern here of these baseless threats designed only to defame, slander and harass me?
July 2:
Such statements are incorrect, false, uninformed and are being made up by those writing them only to be intentional attempts to defame, libel and slander me.
I owed my business partner NOTHING when we closed, in fact he left the state the very same week and left me to deal with the creditors alone, and he declared bankruptcy immediately to avoid paying anything to the creditors himself. I worked with our creditors and finished up the business leaving NO JUDGMENTS or even legal filings for claims against the business or me personally. The public record will confirm this. Compare this to the woman making these statements, who has numerous judgments against her unpaid outstanding for years now, as well as having many more lawsuits on record filed against her for her unpaid bills. She claims she is "the same" as I am. Judge for yourself.
In litigation, I was asked several specific questions. I was asked:
"You have stated that (this person) was convicted of fraud and theft by deception in the state of Utah . "
I denied this question. I have NEVER EVER stated this woman was "convicted of Fraud AND theft by deception in the State of Utah". I have only stated the truth, that this person was convicted of Theft by Deception in the State of Utah. Such is what her felony public record shows.
Now, the Los Angeles Court on the other hand, has said she had committed the crime of Fraud in Utah:
Here, however is what is now being said of me, notice HOW they TWIST reality to libel and defame me publicly:
It would appear through Rob’s own letters to law enforcement and such about (this woman) that as an officer of the court (he is a licensed attorney though not active) Rob Moshein deliberately and unabashedly committed perjury
This woman ADMITS to being convicted of Theft by Deception in Utah, which IS her conviction charge. I admit freely that I did state so. However, they CAN NOT document, as I NEVER STATED, that she was convicted of BOTH FRAUD AND Theft by Deception in Utah.
I denied the question correctly. I never stated she had been convicted of BOTH offenses, just the one the record shows. Why accuse me if her attorney asked a bad question? Its his lack of skill, not my answer...
I was asked : "That you have blocked and prevented certain Internet Protocol’s associated with (this woman's companies) and (this woman) from viewing LaBloodhound website"
I denied the question. Why? there never WAS a website called "LaBloodhound". Thus, I could not have denied access to such a website. Thus I did not lie as the I did deny her and her friends IP addresses access to a website, but NOT to one called "LaBloodhound". YET, here is what is said of me:
"Accordin g to Mike Newson & Justin Edwards this was a lie as they (this woman's Team) has (sic) web photos showing that certain IP's were blocked because it was believed they belonged to (this woman)or those who defended her"
I was asked to admit or deny "That you stated that you worked for Pallasart as the director, billing and accounting." I denied and still deny this statement. I NEVER EVER STATED TO ANYONE ANYWHERE I WORKED FOR PALLASART AS THE "DIRECTOR, BILLING AND ACCOUNTING." One, I never "worked for Pallasart". Two, I never posted anything anywhere on the internet, nor ever said to anyone verbally or in writing that I "worked for Pallasart as the director, billing and accounting."
Yet, the woman and her cronies say "Rob has been caught lying and he wants the public to believe he didn't commit perjury in court documents, he's a lying liar." To "prove this" they show a many years old internet archive page from Pallasart, which says "Rob Moshein, billing". I had NOTHING to do with this web page. I didn't make it, so I never "stated" anything about being "the director, billing and accounting." "IF" somebody at Pallasart put that up there, made that statement, it was not I who made it, I was unaware of it, I never made such a statement, and I never worked for Pallasart as "director, billing and accounting." Again, the woman's attorney asked a bad, poorly written question, which I answered directly and quite truthfully that I DENY that I ever made such a "statement". Somebody else must have made the statement, but I did NOT.
What is actually pretty funny about their insisting and screaming that just because some web page "says" I was the "director, billing" for Pallasart that I MUST be lying when I deny it, is that the very SAME archived pages all show one "Max Sonesta" as "content director".
Well, "Max Sonesta" was not an employee at Pallasart either. One of the Pallasart guys would bring his Scottie dog "Max" to the office every day, where "Max" would pretty much just curl up and sleep all day. "Max Sonesta" is colloquial Italian for "Max, he is sleeping". They used to tell unwanted telephone marketing solicitors that "Max Sonesta" would return their call. "Max Sonesta" was the office mascot and his being on the staff page was an inside joke. I wonder if they will as well still insist that the Scottie dog "Max Sonesta" was "also" a Pallasart employee...
NOW THE WOMAN HERSELF CLAIMS THAT I "TOLD HER ON THE TELEPHONE" THAT I "WORKED IN PALLASART'S BILLING DEPARTMENT". THIS IS A BLATANT FABRICATION, A DELIBERATE FALSEHOOD MADE ENTIRELY OF WHOLE CLOTH AND SUCH CONVERSATION NEVER EVER EVEN TOOK PLACE. EVER. PERIOD. AT ALL TIMES WHEN THIS WOMAN WAS INVOLVED WITH PALLASART, I WAS ENGAGED IN FULL TIME EMPLOYMENT WITH A COMPANY UTTERLY AND COMPLETELY UNRELATED TO PALLASART. I AM NOT NOW NOR HAVE I EVER BEEN AN EMPLOYEE OF PALLASART. EVER. I HAVE NEVER WORKED IN THE "BILLING DEPARTMENT" OF ANY COMPANY, EVER. THERE IS NO REASON WHY I WOULD HAVE EVER MADE SUCH A STATEMENT.
BUT:
See how they distort reality to try to disparage, libel and slander me? To falsely claim I committed perjury is LIBEL PER SE. Their actions and such behavior surely demonstrate who they are and how they operate far greater than anything I can say here. Why am I a liar if her attorney was too inept or stupid to ask a proper question? I ONLY answered the specific questions asked, I never lied, yet, prudently also refused to volunteer information that was NOT asked.
Judge the rest of their unintelligible ranting for what it is...
