Again, Old Lies Repeated to create false truth.

So now this woman claims today that :"The FBI Special Agent who is a part of a team investigating (her) complaint against , Rob Moshein and others confirmed to (her) that Moshein did create ithe(sic) blog.

This is just another clear and outright lie. In fact the statement itself contains the proof of her deliberate false statement. In fact, this same lie was presented a few months ago, I highlight the important statement in bold:
July 7: This woman and "friends" claim that the FBI is investigating me, and that she has been specifically "told" things by the Texas FBI about "the investigation" against me.
Her exact words just from yesterday July 6: "The FBI in Texas and law enforcement in California have told me they believe I am a victim of persistent crimes ... ****** & Rob say they're not criminals because they haven't been convicted of a crime. The FBI told me, one becomes a criminal when they commit a crime."
I decided to call the Austin Field office of the FBI. The Duty Agent told me that FBI policy will of course not confirm nor deny that I am actually under investigation, BUT he was emphatic that the FBI policy is equally strict that they NEVER contact anyone who made a complaint (other than for information), but will NEVER even disclose they are investigating or not) and they NEVER EVER discuss ANY investigation with ANYONE, not even the original person who made the complaint. They CERTAINLY would never say the things this woman claims the FBI "told her" His exact words were "the fact she says the FBI has confirmed or discussed anything with her of the alleged investigation is strong evidence that she is simply not credible." He also said that if there "were" an investigation about me that I "probably would have heard something from them." He said may people file complaints with the FBI which are judged "not credible" and are never acted upon. The mere fact she "may" have filed a complaint does not mean that the FBI would actually conduct an investigation. The most likely scenario is that the FBI did nothing with her "complaint" (if she even did file one) as either not being credible or a waste of their time.
This is not the first time she and "friends" publicly accused me of being investigated by Law Enforcement. Over two years ago, they said publicly that I was "being investigated" by the Texas Attorney General's Office for "crimes". I went down to the AG's office and asked. They replied in writing that NO COMPLAINTS had been filed against me.

As the FBI said to me "this is strong evidence that the person making these claims is simply not credible."

See how they distort reality to try to disparage, libel and slander me?

Deliberate Lies and Deceptive Lies AND their Motive.

This person and/or her nefarious cohorts still sadly continue to blanket the internet with deliberate lies, and deceptive lies, all designed to defame me, disparage me and attempt to drag my character into the mud.

Just today, September 17, they wrote that they will continue to post their mis-truths,defamation, libel and slander about me saying: "I will with sadistic pleasure."
The Dictionary defines "sadistic":
1.sexual gratification gained through causing pain or degradation to others. Compare masochism.
2.The deriving of pleasure, or the tendency to derive pleasure or enjoyment, from cruelty..
3.extreme cruelty.
What more do you need to know about their motives?


Sadly two more of these tawdry tactics from these persons without morals, ethics, decency or any genuine evidence of anything require my statement yet again.

First. They trot out a "statement" they claim I was "willing" to sign. This is designed to somehow assert that the verbiage of that statement is somehow true. This is a deliberate and bald-faced LIE. In February 2005, during litigation this woman instigated against me, I was willing ONLY to CONSIDER a settlement of that litigation. HER attorney demanded that this statement be a part of their offer of settlement. I REFUSED to sign the statement which they published. AT NO TIME WAS I EVER WILLING TO SIGN THE STATEMENT THEY PUBLISHED. The fact was then and remains today that I found that statement which they claim I was "willing to sign" to be repugnant and I refused to admit to things that were not true nor was I willing to pretend that things I knew to be true were not. I repeat, any assertion that I was "willing" to sign the document they publish is a DELIBERATE LIE. The only thing I was ever "willing" to do was read it and consider it as part of the settlement of litigation.


Second. They claim to publish an "affidavit" by her then-attorney as if to assert that the statements therein are somehow "true". This is a DECEPTIVE LIE. The document they purport to be an "Affidavit" is nothing more than the private letter of her attorney to the attorney of another party in the litigation. An "Affidavit" is a statement made under oath and penalty of perjury taken before someone with the authority to administer the oath. The document they claim to be this "affadavit" is nothing more than the blustering opinion of one attorney during the pre trial phase of litigation. This woman was given the opportunity to have the assertion of her attorney to be tried in Court, AND SHE REFUSED AND DISMISSED ALL SUCH CLAIMS AS IF THEY NEVER EXISTED. Now, she and her cohorts DELIBERATELY LIE about the documents, and attempt to assert "opinion" as "truth" by LYING about the document and call it an "affidavit" to deceptively twist reality by attempting to claim the statements therein are "true".

UPDATE: Less than an hour after I posted this blog, I was called a liar. "Snoopy" wrote: "Show me dude where in the hell on this forum or elsewhere on the web does ANYONE and I mean ANYONE claim the letter between [the other party's] attorney and [her] attorney was an AFFIDAVIT, no one has made cliam (sic) this letter was an affidavit you asshole, lying sack of shit."

Well, just three posts above "Snoopy", posted Sept. 12 2008 8:45pm from cohort "Mike":
"and remember that affidavit of the lawyer who reviewed the case finding merit in Oma’s case said:" and then quotes the letter in question.

SEE for yourself how they spin lies to look like truth, see the invective and defamation and deliberate falsehoods.

Yet again, one can see their tactics for what they are. Judge them for yourself.

I wish to state again, that I would not write anything at all publicly about this woman and the matters concerning her which would best be forgotten and in the words of her own attorney to me "the faster she is in my rearview mirror the happier I will be"; however she and her ilk continue to publish these deliberate lies, falsehoods and distortions about me and leave me no alternative but to address them for the deliberate smarmy campaign of defamation that they are.