The woman and her cronies (there is no other term than that which fits) continue their personal attacks upon me and others. Once again, IF this woman would cease these attacks, I would have no reason to keep posting here to defend myself from her public litigation and slander of my name and reputation. Sadly, she encourages, aids and abets this behavior, rather than act within the law, and yet claims she is a victim.
They continue to litigate in public, because they refused to bring any real claims to a legitimate Court of Law when they had the chance. NOW, they wish to act as their own Judge/Jury/Executioner, by making these claims in public and calling themselves "justified". Look up the meaning of "vigilante" particularly the part about "without recourse to lawful procedures"...
Further, they claim perjury was committed at the trial she lost, and that they intend to "pursue" the "crime". LET THIS BE CLEAR: Nobody committed "perjury" and nobody "forged documents". She has done NOTHING to prove them. She makes these allegations and threatens they are being "pursued". Yet again, just like when she claimed that the judgment against her was going to be "set aside", they did not bother to read the applicable law and statutes. Just as she was WRONG then, she is wrong now. "Perjury" in Texas has a statute of limitations of two years, running from the time the act was committed. The applicable limitations period for aggravated perjury in Texas is two years. Ex parte Tamez, 4 S.W.3d 854 at 856.
She or her crony/alter ego wrote: hahahaha no Rob, go back to law school better yet Rob call the State Attorney General’s Office or O.k. um the County Attorney asked them could Bob be criminally prosecuted for lying and perjury in the last case I did. I spoke to someone at the Texas Attorney General's office (who don't have jurisdiction, but answered my question anyway). I am correct. The Statute of Limitations has long since passed. I confirmed this with a criminal attorney who practices in Austin. The same answer came from a District Court Judge I know.
The trial in question took place September 27, 2005. Thus, any claim for the alleged "perjury" MUST have been brought before September 2007, some full NINETEEN MONTHS ago. The truth is the woman's threats are, yet again, empty. The truth is, she makes these claims, she has the burden of proof to DO SOMETHING to prove them legally and does NOTHING except attempt to prove them "true" by "saying so..."
So, the continuing truth is that she never HAS done anything about her threats and claims, her threats are empty and meaningless, and I hope that readers can see this obvious fact for themselves:
She claims "imminent" arrest for me and others...after literally years, nothing happens.
She claims "criminal investigation" about me and others. After years, the specific law enforcement agencies all claim I certainly "would know" of any investigation, YET NOTHING happens.
She claimed she would "overturn" judgments against her, but avoided actually DOING anything, but still made the meaningless threats as if it was "imminent"
She claims threats of pursuing "perjury" long AFTER the period to bring such a claim under the law. Yet makes the threats as if "imminent".
She has valid legal judgments against her which, in so many words, she says she REFUSES to comply with.
NOTICE her continued refusal to acknowledge and co-operate with the law, her continued refusal to comply with Courts...and yet plays the victim.
WHAT DOES THIS ALL TELL YOU ABOUT THIS WOMAN?
I also want to bring forward evidence to demonstrate the truth behind this woman and her cohorts and cronies. Here is just one recent example of a barely coherent, ranting, vulgar tirade, by someone who freely admits to an alcohol abuse problem and who is fully ignorant about Texas law and "perjury". Judge the words here as to the type of person who would write them publicly and the character of that person. Ask yourself what does it say about the writer and his character? More important, what does it say about this woman herself who claims this person as her "champion" and permits such tirades on her own website bearing her own name. Would YOU associate publicly with this writer?:
Post by Snoopy on Mon Apr 13, 2009 9:42 am
No, I don't believe Alexandra & Nicholas are saints they were people who made a lot of mistakes and let their children die because of their mistakes, no I don't think these two people are heroes and I don't like Alexandra. I do wonder what this dead woman who Bob worships must think of this man who says she told him to hurt my friend, when I have had too many drinks I think this dead woman is a bitch for doing this then I have to stop and think "What am I talking about?" she didn't tell him this, this is his words Not Hers, he says this dead woman told him in a dream to do whatever it took to hurt my friend, this did not happen. I read the letter from the church people to Oma they did not tell anyone Oma was the devil's mistress, they did not call her names, their priests did not do any thing Bob Atchison says they did or said against my friend Oma yet Bob says they did. Who do I believe the church not some --- who has proven time and time again he doesn't know how to tell the truth. Look at the lies he told about Father Markell yet in court he couldn't prove shit just that his shit stunk, real nice person this Bob Atchison is?
Sandman, yes, Rob rubbed it in Oma's face in all of our faces when he said it was too late for Oma to do anything about setting aside Bob's judgment, so what if Bob lied and his attorney lied and he used forged documents Oma couldn't do anything about it. But that's not true because criminally Bob could be held accountable even Bob after all these years you sicko because you and your people keep on doing shit and causing other crazy people to hurt my friend because you pretend what you say about Oma and the church and repeating what was told to you by Marcus Demian is the truth, uh-huh, my friend got hurt you told someone you were glad she got hurt that you thought the world would be better off without my friend living in it. That person is willing to testify against you my friend was hurt because of words you and your lover Rob published on the web as being the truth about her life.
Snoopy
No comments:
Post a Comment