As law enforcement seems unable to assist me, and the person behind this campaign to defame me and interfere with my business and profession, she uses many alias names: Oma Hamou, Oma Mcconnell or Alexandra McConnell is what they call "judgment proof" meaning she has no money, I must place this blog here.
I would NOT even have written here, had this person not continually written her own false and defamatory statements herself and aided and abetted other personae writing "on her behalf" for the last three years. If she doesn't want me to say anything about her, she ought not have been continually blogging and writing about me much less aiding and encouraging others to do so as well.
The woman behind all of this goes by many names: Oma Hamou, Oma McConnell, Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Hamou, Oma Demian, Alexandra Murphy, are the usual ones, but there are others. She uses a business name of "Enigma Royal Films, LLC" she also calls just "Enigma Films" and "Reseda Glass". The reason this woman and her "alleged" friends crusade to destroy me is simple. I learned about her genuine background, and she wants me silenced from speaking about it.
This woman admits that her actions are all motivated by her bitterness and hatred towards me, and this is the reason for her actions.
This woman, Oma Hamou, Oma McConnell, Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Hamou, Oma Demian, Alexandra Murphy and her other aliases have a twenty year track record of FELONY CONVICTIONS, multiple arrests, failure to abide by the requirements of her probation for her felony convictions which lead to more arrests, many many civil judgments against her for hundreds of thousands of dollars, a history of writing bad checks, and she was arrested late in 2008 in San Bernardino California on a Felony Charge of Forgery of a Financial Instrument (she seems to have forged a large check) After 14 months of dragging the process out, she paid the Victim full restitution and the District Attorney dropped the Felony charge. She has a history of evictions and bad checks.
A complete dossier has been posted, with the details on her activities, notably passing bad checks, stiffing landlords for rent owed and trashing the houses she rents by reason of keeping literally dozens of cats and dogs and not cleaning up after them. Not to mention numerous unpaid judgments against her.
That blog is here.
This woman also has a recent default Judgment against her in Los Angeles County, in the amount of $55,000 which is admitted under oath was owing in her Bankruptcy Petition:
Case Number: MC020860 HAMID REFAI VS ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL, JIM SPROUL, ET AL
Filing Date: 09/23/2009
According to the case, Mr. Refai, a married man, was "involved" with Alexandra McConnell, she kept telling him about serious "medical problems" and asking for "loans" for medical bills in the total amount of $51,000. This was confirmed by the fact that a woman who used to live in her house wrote on the internet THREE MONTHS before the suit was filed: "I lived with this lady, she is no good. SHE LIES. SHE HAS LIKE 50 CATS LIVING WITH HER AND HER HOUSE SMELLS LIKE SHIT AND CAT SPRAY AND PISS. She is dirty, filthy and uses old men for money I SEEN IT MYSELF. By the way Hamid's wife knows it was LIPOSUCTION you drained their bank account for, not cancer in your asshole. He had her sign a promissory note, co signed by long time co-conspirator Jim Sproul. She of course never PAID back the money. She, of course, never showed up in Court.
Here is the Final Judgment against Alexandra McConnell aka Oma Hamou and her "longtime friend" Jim Sproul:
OMA HAMOU AKA ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL SCAMS:
The following have agreed to speak with law enforcement or potential landlords about their experiences and the Felony Forgery charge against this woman, in the hopes that others will not fall prey to her in the future.
CHARLANE CHIPI. Represented by Attorney LAURENCE H. LISHNER filed Unlawful Detainer (EVICTION) against her tenant Oma McConnell (aka Oma Hamou aka Alexandra McConnell aka Alexandra Moran) Case Number: 08U03169
CHIPI, CHARLANE VS. MCCONNELL, OMA
Filing Date: 09/22/2008
Dismissed after Hamou/McConnell left the property. Mr. Lishner: (323) 870-3311
Robert Atchison
Won a Civil Judgment against Oma Hamou for her failure to pay him consulting fees as she promised him she would do.
Mr. Atchison is proceeding with Post Judgment Document Production demands from Oma Hamou. A District Court Judge has signed an order requiring her to schedule and appear at a deposition in Austin Texas no later than September 3 to disclose her assets, finances, and employment information, and she is further ORDERED to comply by providing the requested financial, employment and asset documentation to Mr. Atchison no later than August 20. She did nothing. Her failure to do these things resulted in an order of Contempt of Court.
August 2011: Hamou/McConnell tried to derail Mr. Atchison's debt collection with a last moment filing of a "Bill of Review". Hamou's Bill of Review was dismissed on July 26, 2011 by the Hon Judge Cooper of the District Court. Hamou now has no choice but to comply with the Court order.
OCTOBER 18:
The Court slapped Oma Hamou with an Order of Contempt of Court and imposed $1,000 sanctions against her for failing to comply with the Ordered Document Production and Deposition.
January 2012: District Court Lora Livingston Slapped an ORDER TO APPEAR AND SHOW CAUSE on Oma Hamou requiring her to appear in Person to explain her continuing violation of Court Orders. Her failure to appear will most likely result in a Bench Warrant for her Arrest:
Eric Cowan
Landlord in 2010. Bad checks and trashed house. Rented from him as "Alexandra McConnell" but presented an expired California Driver's License in the name of Oma Hamou.
661-947-2079
Thomas Ward
Attorney for Hamid Refai (victim of a scam who loaned Alexandra McConnell $50,000, for "cancer treatments" actually used by Alexandra McConnellto pay the Victim Restitution in the Felony Forgery case in Victorville, never repaid). Los Angeles Superior Court Case Number: MC020860 HAMID REFAI VS ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL, ET AL
Mr. Ward's telephone number for details: 661-948-5021
Nancy's Reseda Screen & Glass
Has information about people looking for Jim Sproul and Oma Hamou about numerous bad checks and missing cars
818-708-2981
Bryan Stodghill
Prosecutor in Victorville,San Bernardino County Felony Forgery Case where Alexandra McConnell wrote a check in 2009 on a closed account to the landlord, and in his words "She basically destroyed the house." He states that he would have taken her to trial on the charge had she not paid full Victim Restitution to the Landlord for the bad check and damages to the house.
760-243-8600
Patrick J. O'Connor
Homeowner in Littlerock California who was selling his house using the services of Shari Porter agent with Big Valley Realty in Palmdale California. Shari Porter brought "Alexandra Moran" using an expired drivers license in the name of Oma Hamou to Mr. O'Connor as a "Qualified Buyer" of his home. Shari Porter insisted Oma Hamou be allowed to rent part of the home as a room mate of Mr. O'Connor until the sale closed. Porter kept informing Mr. O'Connor that Hamou was pre-qualified by lenders, yet never actually provided the required documentation proving this to O'Connor. Shari Porter told O'Connor that Hamou had deposited funds into escrow at Titan Escrow in Palmdale, but again refused to give O'Connor any actual escrow documents. Hamou delayed closing for a full five months, then refused to close when O'Connor demanded. She further refused to leave the property and now squats in the residence with four men, another woman and four or five children and literally ten or twelve dogs and forty to fifty cats. She has moved an old trailer and cargo boxes onto the property as well.
pjoinak@yahoo.com (I also have Mr. O'Connor's cell phone number should anyone wish to speak with him directly)
She uses 145 South Glenoaks Burbank, CA as her "legal address". However this address is actually FEDEX Burbank and is nothing more than a mail drop.
OMA HAMOU/AKA OMA MCCONNELL, ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL, ALEXANDRA MORAN EVICTION HISTORY:
Filing Date: 09/22/2008. CHIPI CHARLANE. Represented by Attorney LAURENCE H. LISHNER filed Unlawful Detainer (EVICTION) against her tenant Oma McConnell Case Number: 08U03169
CHIPI, CHARLANE VS. MCCONNELL, OMA
2009 Alexandra McConnell wrote a check in 2009 on a closed account to the landlord Huiku Batchelor. Felony Fraud charges pressed and Hamou aka McConnell evicted after being incarcerated in jail. In the proscuter's words: in his words "She basically destroyed the house."
2010: "Alexandra McConnell" rented from Eric Cowan, but presented an expired California Driver's License in the name of Oma Hamou. Hamou/McConnell gave Cowan bad checks for rent and Cowan filed unlawful detainer/eviction and got her out of his house. Cowan, Eric vs. Hamou, Oma (Michael Antonovich Antelope Valley Courthouse, Case No. 10U01290). Erik Cowan will confirm 661-947-2079
2011 "Alexandra Moran" rented a room from Patrick J. O'Connor, but presented an expired California Drivers License in the name of Oma Hamou. She then claimed to want to purchase the property. She delayed the purchase for FIVE MONTHS with numerous stories, and is now squatting on the property without permission nor paying rent . She lives there with her son, Nicholas Royal Moran, who has severe psychiatric disorders (his is currently under Conservatorship pursuant to the California Lanterman Petris Short Act) and has a history of violence, both domestic and with police. Mr. O'Connor himself witnessed Nicholas Moran beat his mother in front of him in the residence. She also lives with one Steve Fred Lee, who has over 15 criminal convictions for eluding police, indecent exposure and habitual driving with a revoked drivers license. Another squatter on the property is one Michael McBride who lives with four or five of his children also on the property. Hamou also has literally many dozens of cats and more than 10 dogs on the property. Hamou attempted to keep Mr. O'Connor from evicting her by filing a Restraining Order against Mr. O'Connor alleging he made threats of violence against her and her son. However, she did NOT file this order until a full TWO WEEKS after Mr. O'Connor left the residence and moved to Alaska! Hearing on the requested Restraining order was held Friday July 15. Hamou first requested a continuance! The Judge refused to delay the hearing. After the Judge examined her criminal record, arrest record and history of evictions and Judgments, the Judge in so many words called Hamou "a Criminal and Con Artist" recognized her string of VICTIMS and refused to grant the restraining order, and further told Hamou that while he could not order her out at the moment, she did have to leave O'Connor's property and pay him the rent owed. Hamou told O'Connor by email she will be out by September 1. Mr. O'Connor's attorney has begun Eviction Proceedings against Hamou McConnell and her other squatters. While Hamou wrote Mr. O'Connor that she would be "out of the house by September 1" she has hired a lawyer to delay the eviction proceedings. Reports indicate that the house is trashed, with old furniture in the yard, many old rusted trucks, tires, boxes and piles of trash are strewn across the property. These photos of the property confirm these reports:
Mr. O'Connor filed an Unlawful Detainer Action in Los Angeles Superior Court, Case 11U2065 to evict Hamou.
Patrick J. O'Connor will confirm and is anxious to discuss his Experiences with Oma Hamou aka Alexandra McConnell aka Oma Mc Connell aka Alexandra Moran. pjoinak@yahoo.com
She also has a history of failing to pay her attorneys. The following law firms have judgments against her and/or are owed money by this woman:
Freeman Freeman & Smiley in Los Angeles $10,000
Westar Legal Services in Los Angeles, $10,000
Foster Malish LLC in Austin Texas $20,000
Suzanne Curtis in Los Angeles $1,000
2011 "Alexandra Moran" rented a room from Patrick J. O'Connor, but presented an expired California Drivers License in the name of Oma Hamou. She then claimed to want to purchase the property. She delayed the purchase for FIVE MONTHS with numerous stories, and is now squatting on the property without permission nor paying rent Mr. O'Connor has retained an attorney and legal action is pending for yet ANOTHER EVICTION. Patrick J. O'Connor will confirm. pjoinak@yahoo.com
NEW INFORMATION IN THIS MATTER JUNE 25, 2011:
Published on the web by Oma Hamou herself:
From: sarskaia@aol.com
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:18:25 -0400 (EDT)
To:
Subject: Re: The Motorcycle
Mr. O'Connor,
I will not be arrested for the motorcycle as you left it here because I was going to buy it. If you no longer want to sell it to me, I have no problems giving it to Ralph. He must contact me and arrange a time and the day with me so that we can coordinate our schedules. He or no other friend of yours can just show up and expect to gain access.
She admits here that she doesn't OWN the motorcycle and admits Mr. O'Connor wants his bike BACK.
So what does "Alexandra McConnell" aka Oma Hamou aka Alexandra Moran do??
She SELLS THE MOTORCYCLE to one "Craig" for $4,500!!
"Craig" gets suspicious because "Alexandra" can't produce the title (which of course Mr. O'Connor still had) and would only give him a handwritten bill of sale (a copy of which I have in my possession now). The Los Angeles County Sheriffs were involved YET AGAIN with her and her various names to safely return the motorcycle to Mr. O'Connor!
Selling property that she admits isn't HERS to sell legally! Isn't that "grand theft"??
Also, taking money for property you do not own nor have title to by claiming it is yours to sell is "THEFT BY DECEPTION" a felony crime for which she has been convicted three times in the past.
Someone else has recently posted a precis of the criminal and debt history of this woman. You can go here to read the specific details for yourself:
http://www.omahamoureality.blogspot.com
I have put up a precis of the specific information for her victims and law enforcement here: http://OmaHamouVictims.blogspot.com
You are encouraged to share information you may have about her and her activities with me.
OMA HAMOU AKA ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL BAD CHECK HISTORY:
07/22/2010 `NSF` CHECK WRITTEN BY OMA HAMOU WAS RECEIVED BY THE LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT FOR FILING FEES AND MOTION FEE , (HAMOU, OMA) AKA(MCCONNELL, ALEXANDRA) AKA (DEMIAN, OME) AKA (ASHKENAZY, OMA) AKA (HAMOU, ALEXANDRA) AKA(CHEDID, OMA) AKA (JORDAN, REBECCA) AKA (TAYLOR, JORDAN) AKA (ABRAMOV, OMA) NOTIFIED BY MAIL PER SECTION C.C.P. 411.20. PAYMENT DUE BY 08/16/10 , IN THE SUM OF $ 310.00 . Proof is here in the case record: Cowan, Eric vs. Hamou, Oma (Michael Antonovich Antelope Valley Courthouse, Case No. 10U01290)
EARLY 2010 ERIK COWAN RECEIVED SEVERAL CHECKS FROM ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL/OMA HAMOU FOR RENT DUE ON PROPERTY HE OWNED. CHECKS WHERE BOTH NSF AND ON A CLOSED FLORIDA ACCOUNT BELONGING TO RESEDA SCREEN & GLASS. OMA HAMOU IS EVICTED FROM THE PROPERTY AS A RESULT. Cowan, Eric vs. Hamou, Oma (Michael Antonovich Antelope Valley Courthouse, Case No. 10U01290). Erik Cowan will confirm 661-947-2079
OCTOBER 2008 MRS. HUIKU BATCHELOR IS WRITTEN A CHECK FOR RENT BY ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL ON A CLOSED ACCOUNT IN THE NAME OF OMA HAMOU. THIS CHECK IS PROSECUTED AS FELONY FORGERY BY THE SAN BERNARDINO DISTRICT ATTORNEY. Case No. FVI802540 . District Attorney Bryan Stodghill will confirm. 760-243-8600
2004 OMA HAMOU ISSUES CHECKS ON A CLOSED ACCOUNT TO THE FOLLOWING PERSONS IN IRVINE CALIFORNIA:
ONE TO MONIQUE HAHN,
ONE TO WILD WEST MEDIA (17522 Von Karman Ave. Irvine, CA. 92614) ,
ONE TO RICH SCHAEFER.
-Police investigation into these bad checks was opened by the Irvine Police Department.
June 25, 1991 – Oma Demian (NOW OMA HAMOU) is arrested in the State of Utah for NSF Check November 7,1991 "Oma McConnell" (aka Oma Demian) was convicted in the State of Utah, Park City District Court, Utah Administrative Office of the Courts case number 2218-911613381, of the 2nd degree Felony crime of "Theft By Deception" in violation of Utah Criminal Statue 76-6-405, and a disposition of "Guilty" has been entered in that Court for this crime.
NSF CHECKS IN THIS CASE WERE WRITTEN TO
JUPITER PROPERTY MANAGEMENT/DIANE APT $5,000
FIRST SECURITY BANK $4,500
NSF Checks written by Oma Demian (now Hamou) in Wyoming to:
KMart, 12/14/90 $437.95
United Airlines 12/17/90 $3,456.00
JANUARY 24, 1992 OMA DEMIAN (NOW OMA HAMOU) CONVICTED IN YELLOWSTONE COUNTY MONTANA FOR FELONY OF ISSUING A BAD CHECK COMMON SCHEME, SENTENCED TO TEN YEARS PROBATION.
April 1, 1992: Oma Demian NOW OMA HAMOU AKA ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL convicted of the Felony offense of Issuing a bad check over $150 was sentenced to 120 months in Prison, sentence suspended. Case 91-103, in Billings,Yellowstone County Montana, for the fraudulent checks issued in 1991.
She is nearly psychotic in her daily compulsion because I stumbled onto these actual facts of her past, and present, which do not coincide with the personae she wants to project to others.
This woman, Oma Hamou, Oma McConnell, Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Hamou, Oma Demian, Alexandra Murphy et al, has for YEARS now, threatened me with civil and criminal actions. For years now, NOTHING has happened except more ongoing threats online.
I am called a "criminal stalker". First, being called a criminal is Libel per se in Texas, since I have never been convicted of ANYTHING worse than one speeding ticket. As for a stalker, well, I have no clue where this woman is, where she lives, and frankly I don't WANT to know, nor can I care less. In the words of one of her attorney's, Dave. S. "the faster that woman is in my rearview mirror the happier I'll be" (yeah I have the email he said that to me in.). I WISH NO CONTACT WITH OR FROM THIS PERSON.
I do NOT wish this person ill, or harm. Frankly, I do not care about her. The less I hear about her, the better. That said, no one should ever be subjected to harm or danger. I DO NOT WISH THIS PERSON HARM, nor have I advocated, wished, nor advised anyone to harm her. Such allegations are baseless, wrong and defamatory. I just want he to leave me and my partner ALONE and stop the thousands of pages of defamatory lies she puts up and allows "friends" to post on her website in order to cause me harm.
OMA HAMOU BUSINESS ENTITY: "ENIGMA ROYAL FILMS, LLC."
Hamou has reactivated a dormant LLC, Enigma Royal Films. BEWARE however, that the "agent" for service of process is LONG out of date. Shari Leinwand with Gibson, Dunn NO LONGER SERVES AS AGENT. Oma Hamou aka Alexandra McConnell aka Oma McConnell is the TRUE agent for service of process. As an active LLC, there are large debts this LLC owes:
10/24/2002 Writ of Execution Issued (LOS ANGELES COUNTY, ENIGMA ROYAL FILMS,LLC, $82,012.56 ) by American Express. Case Number: PC027665 AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SER. CO. VS. ENIGMA ROYAL
02/07/2006 JUDGMENT ENTERED AS A FINAL DISPOSITION ON 02/07/06 . FOR (CURTIS, SUZANNE M) ATTORNEY AT LAW . AGAINST (HAMOU, OMA) , (ENIGMA ROYAL FILMS, LLC) Case Number: 05V09066 CURTIS, SUZANNE M VS. HAMOU, OMA
OMA HAMOU AKA ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL BANKRUPTCY DISCREPENCIES AND TAX RECORD DISCREPENCIES:
Oma Hamou Alexandra McConnell filed for Bankruptcy with the Federal Court earlier in 2010. Here is her Bankruptcy Petition, this is the entire PDF file of 2mb, which is public record from the Court. She also filed tax returns with her lender trying to get a loan to purchase the O'Connor house. Comparing the two shows glaring discrepancies and untruths.
—Omission of Assets on Bankruptcy Petition and Schedules is considered A False Statement Under Penalty of Perjury, 18 U.S.C. § 152(3):
Oma Hamou owns two business entities, Enigma Films, Inc., and The Sarskaia Foundation plus Enigma Royal Films, LLC. Further, Oma Hamou owns and operates a website at www.OmaHamou.com, where she and alleged friends post information about her. Interestingly, Ms Hamou lists her own company, Enigma Films as her employer. The clear inference is that Enigma Films earns money with which to pay her as an employee. Yet, there is no declaration or disclosure of her ownership of these companies, nor disclosure of the value of these assets she owns.
HOWEVER: Her 2010 Tax Return states that she PURCHASED "Reseda Glass" in April 2010, three full months before the Bankruptcy filing.
Notice here in her Loan Application she lists $145,000 CASH as an asset, yet, she FAILS to identify exactly WHERE that cash is.
The Refai Judgment was just the previous year, yet she FAILED to disclose that to the lender. She lists small old debts, some as long ago as ten years, BUT FAILS TO DISCLOSE A SINGLE DEBT SHE LISTS ON THE BANKRUPTCY PETITION, JUST SIX MONTHS EARLIER. Interestingly, she doesn't list a SINGLE one of the debts on her Loan Application on her Bankruptcy Petition either!see below
Hamou received in excess of $50,000 in cash from Mr. Refai in May 2009, (see above) for which she signed a promissory note. Hamou made no disclosure of the whereabouts of this large sum of cash, nor did she disclose just where this substantial asset went. She FAILED to mention it to her lender as well...
Her 2010 IRS returns show "income" of $38,000 or $2,459 per month. She claims a "sole proprietorship" called "Reseda Glass" that "installs glass in high rise buildings" but has NO Federal Employer ID number, nor does she list any WAGES paid to any "employees". Is this almost 50 year old woman hanging off the side of a building installing glass ALL BY herself?
Her 2009 IRS Return, filed the same day (April 2011) swears that she was self employed earning $2,130 per month.
HOWEVER, her Bankruptcy Petition shows she claimed to have been employed for TEN YEARS by "Enigma Films and Glass Tech" earning $3,000 per month.
HOWEVER in, her LOAN APPLICATION Section IV "Employment Information" she wrote that "Reseda Glass" at the same address as her "residence", which is just actually a mail drop at a Fedex Office store, was her employer for TWO YEARS, and she earned $2459 per month.
—Omission of Assets on Bankruptcy Petition and Schedules is considered A False Statement Under Penalty of Perjury, 18 U.S.C. § 152(3).
Hamou McConnell Moran claims of violence, rape and cancer...
In 2002, she wrote to a Russian Orthodox Priest
Your Eminence: I am writing to you to ask you to remember me in your prayers- 2 weeks ago I underwent surgery to remove cancer from my colon and I have 100 stitches inside of me. The physicians told me yesterday that my white blood count is high and that I have 2 choices chemotherapy or another surgery as they fear that it is spread in my uterus. I am scared. I am a single mother and I work hard and now my life...my health is not good. I have been in the hospital and now I may have another surgery this week. Some things are worth more than money-
June 2007: Her ex husband confirms Oma Hamou was still claiming cancer:
I herd this from my daughter ...Anyway...according to (my daughter) that is the case...she has cancer and has fulfilled her name of Oma which means cancer in Latin.
May 11, 2009 "Alexandra McConnell" signs a promissory note borrowing $50,000 from Hamid Refai, Mr. Refai confirms, through his attorney Thomas Ward that "Alexandra McConnell" borrowed this money to pay for "cancer treatments"
This is further confirmed by an email from a former roommate who wrote on July 8, 2009: By the way Hamid's wife knows it was LIPOSUCTION you drained their bank account for, not cancer in your asshole.
August 23, 2010 on her website: yes she is still undergoing treatment for her cancer. I can definitely attest to the fact that she has indeed suffered from cancer. Those treatments are so hard on her that I have had to help her back to the car, then into her house and even into bed because they leave her so sick and weak that she cannot do anything.
Ask yourself if the following make any, rational or reasonable common sense:
This woman claims to be an actress and model, but for a decade steadfastly REFUSES to provide one single shred of evidence to support the allegation, not even a credit, reference or magazine issue. She says only "I was and I don't have to prove it. YOU have to prove I wasn't". Does that make sense?
This woman claims that her three felony convictions were not Her fault, but rather someone else's fault. Does THAT make sense?
This woman claims that her recent Felony Forgery Charges in San Bernardino are "just a big mistake" and "law enforcement and the DA" are on "her side" and "believe her", yet they STILL pressed charges and scheduling dozens of hearings over FOURTEEN MONTHS. Does THAT make sense??
This woman has claimed for six years non stop that I am being investigated by law enforcement and the FBI. Yet, NOTHING ever happened, I have never been contacted by law enforcement for any reason in those six years other than one speeding ticket. Does it make any sense to you that law enforcement is doing ANYTHING for six years now?
Buddha said Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense.
Look at all the blathering posts she has put up on the internet, and ask yourself, do these things agree with YOUR reason and your own common sense? The answer is obvious.
As you can see, this woman and/or her cronies now LIE, falsify documents and use years old private letters to attempt to defame and disparage me, and Bob Atchison
Many people whom have come into contact with her call her a con artist and scam artist. She hangs out with convicted felons, even inviting these career criminals to live in her house with her.
You can verify all the arrests, judgments, evictions, etc for yourself with simple online searches.
You are free to email me with your questions, Rob@AustinWineGuy.com, and if you yourself have been a VICTIM of this woman Oma Hamou, Oma McConnell, Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Hamou, Oma Demian, Alexandra Murphy and her NEWEST Alexandra Moran, I encourage you to contact me.
217 comments:
1 – 200 of 217 Newer› Newest»Fresh new blog here please for new comments.
Any news?
Has Hamou said anything on her forum regarding her attorney withdrawing from her case?
Uh, Hamou. Exactly how is anyone using the Alexander Time Machine to promote anything regarding you?
You're really reaching here and looking the desperate imbecile again.
Everything Bob Atchison and Rob Moshein do regarding you, they do in the open and under their own names. This blog is ample proof of it.
Your argument that two men, who so openly publish things about your shenanigans, somehow need to resort to secretiveness to get their story out is as absurd as you are.
Trying to appear to be the real Russophile by trotting out this tired old grudge she has against the Alexander Time Machine for booting her off it is kind of pitiful.
Let's talk real turkey here, though.
Why is Shane Boasberg, your "highly competent Austin attorney", no longer representing you?
Why have none of us heard from any "law enforcement" personnel despite months (actually years) of claims we soon will?
Why did your UD lawyer tell you not to answer any questions from Bank of America about your presence in Patrick O'Connor's house lest you be sued?
Why did the Palmdale Sheriff's Department advise you to get your squatting ass out of O'Connor's house?
Why are the police keeping Patrick abreast of things regarding you if you are the one they so solidly support and want to protect?
And who shot the taillight out of Bitsy's Lincoln as it was driving by O'Connor's house?
Thanks for bringing that up, Blake. Oma, Mitzi told you that I would give you the car seats for your front lawn after I get rid of the Lincoln. That isn't going to happen any faster because of nonsense like that. I just had the tail light replaced.
Also, buttercup, the fence is padlocked? Really?
Bitsy
Snoopy-who-is-Oma posted:
"Judge in the previous hearing wrote Oma a letter about the lies you published on the web"
Yeah, right. Judges write letters to one party in cases before their bench.
Nitwit. Such correspondence with a party to an action before the court is a violation of legal ethics as well as court rules.
But, of course, you will protest about how special you and your circumstances are, such that a judge would violate the rules to come to your aid.
Right.
So why don't you POST these letters you've received from judges?
Dear Oma,
I notice that your ex-attorney's purported email doesn't say anything like "thanks for the check." I'm sure you elided that out?
Cordially,
Rebecca
Oma Hamou,
I completely deny every statement you make about any conversations you allege I had with Patrick.
You are a LIAR. You are WRONG and nothing you said is remotely close to the truth.
Instead of your insane allegations, you must prove the truth of your statements. You can't. Such proof doesn't exist.
You DEFY Court Orders. You squat in house NOT YOURS, without paying rent and refuse to leave despite the OWNER telling you to vacate.
You are a criminal. You are a con artist. You are an unemployed scam artist who preys on others.
and a liar.
Fascinating. I have been looking at the "records" of Enigma "Films" and the Sarskaia "Foundation", and I have to tell you all, these were pretty low-rent scams. Unthinkable prior to the age of the internet, but she was able to keep a shell game going that meant that people like Sautov, you, Bob, and the vendors she conned in California (and apparently in Russia as well) from easily getting in touch with her or each other. The essential flaw in the scheme, and what ultimately brought it down, was the complete lack of product. There was no movie deal, no chance of a movie deal, and the "foundation" never had anything like legal status as a potential agency in either Russia or the United States. All of this was bound to be brought to light eventually, and it was.
Enigma had no employees. None. There is no IRS verification of payroll. All of that crap about one hundred employees? Associates killed in the 9/11 terrorist attacks??? There was no one "working" for this company except Oma Hamou. I am now working to discover if she in fact filed income tax as the CEO of Enigma "Films", and whether she filed deductions in that capacity.
Rebecca
Rob,
I also noticed that she omitted "you defy court orders" from the list of charges in your post when she denied the allegations on her site. Well, how can she deny that. There is a judge in Texas who wants to see you, Oma. Before he quit, did Shane advise you to cooperate with the court?
RJ
RJ
Shane told the Judge he advised Hamou to comply with the court orders, but that she wouldn't and he had "no excuses" as to why.
Why DOES Oma Hamou refuse to explain WHY she defies repeated COURT ORDERS?
Oma Hamou is the only person who posts in her forum and no one reads it except her and us.
Oma Hamou posts to make herself feel important, loved and beautiful. She loves to read her own sock-puppet postings over and over again. They are all lies and myths she has created herself, but this doesn't matter to her in the least. God loves her, she is innocent, all her victims are criminals, everyone except herself are being investigated and going to prison... the topsy-turvy lies go on and on. There are thousands of pages of them.
However, no matter how many sock-puppet names she hides behind and how many lies she tells it is all a house of cards that is on the brink of collapse.
The Oma Hamou con is coming to a final end. In a few weeks she will decide to appear before the judge here in Texas or not. It will be the last fateful choice she makes that will end her criminal career one way or another.
It has taken years to bring Oma Hamou to the bar of justice, and now the final act of that long process is here.
Well, Bob, I think we all know that Hamou is not going to stand voluntarily in front of a judge in Texas, as her "highly competent Austin attorney" has by now made it clear to her that there is nothing he, she, or anyone else can do to reverse or escape the jury verdict against her.
Which means, of course, that she knows if she shows up in Austin in front of a judge she is not going to leave until she has either paid the judgment (plus interest, plus sanctions) or submitted to a debtor's exam.
Who knows what will happen on February 17? There always seems to be one extra step to take to get to a bench warrant. But each step brings the inevitable one step closer, as long as you stick with it.
Hamou has a long, long record of getting out of scrapes by the skin of her teeth, through a combination of picking impaired victims and then wearing them down by playing the court system with every dilatory tactic and trick she can cook up. And most eventually do what she was counting on all along -- they throw up their hands and walk away out of frustration and/or exhaustion of resources.
But this time is different, and I think she is now beginning to absorb that fact. You are not going to give up, and the resources are not going to run out.
Not this time.
Sooner or later -- and it may well be as soon as February 17 -- a bench warrant will issue for her arrest.
Quite so Blake. Oma Hamou will have to face the courts continually until she either complies in FULL with Court ORDRES or pays Bob every penny the Courts awarded him.
She feels she has the right to decide for herself if Courts are to obeyed or not. She believes she has the right to pick and choose what laws to obey or disobey.
She will be hauled to Justice and made to answer and pay.
Period.
Oma Oma Oma. Don't you understand that a BENCH WARRANT is a CRIMINAL problem, not civil.
It is a CRIME to refuse to comply with a Court Order! You are again a CRIMINAL.
Hamou posted:
"I have 13 signatures from 13 different prospective landlords and each of them say it isn't because of my credit"
That would likely be only because they didn't get as far as running your credit report once they found out your eviction history, your damage to landlords' properties, your legion of outstanding judgments, and your check-writing habits.
These are all matters of public record. One only has to know under which of your various aliases to find the records. And we're quite happy to be of service to unsuspecting landlords and other victims in that regard. What do you think public records are far, dimwit, if not to make the public aware of certain things?
Remember, O'Connor obtained a copy of your credit report through discovery.
It's a train wreck, chock full of credit overruns and debt defaults -- not to mention several of the aliases you have used.
Yes Oma. I'm sure both your friends believe you. The two of them: Steve Lee and Braindead Biernat.
Nobody else does.
Oma it is all you posting. Just because Biernat the Braindead isn't posting doesn't she isn't stupid enough to believe you.
Ah, the juvenile graphics are back on display by Oma Hamou aka Alexandra Mcconnell.
She's really feeling sorry for herself again. she always trots those tired, 8th grade level online graphics out when she's feeling sorry for herself.
guess she confirmed that we heard directly from Father Markell that he is NOT in contact with her whatsoever, for years now...
"I've stepped on that rake three times before. I won't step on it again" he said years ago.
Oma, you better check again. BENCH WARRANTS are CRIMINAL. Not Civil.
See, you will be tossed in JAIL (again) for up to SIX MONTHS for your refusal to obey Court Orders! (see the Texas Criminal and Government Code). That is a CRIMINAL MATTER. Not Civil.
But then, some LA flatfoot stuck working in the misery of Palmdale wouldn't understand Texas law.
Maybe your San Bernardino Jail friends (from that pesky two weeks you spent there for FELONY FORGERY charges last year) know some Austin jail inmates who will show you the ropes.
Hamou posted:
"in an attempt of osterizing me from the Church"
Osterizing?
Now why on earth would the Church put someone in a kitchen blender?
Were they making dungeoness crabs?
The Hillbilly Rodeo must be back in town.
Don't be so sadastic, Blake.Civil, criminal, I have only one question: does one of those categories mean no handcuffs? Because they both mean you're going to be arrested, sweetheart.
RJ
Dear Oma,
Evidence of what? I'm asking a question, and since you are the only person I know to ask about being arrested, I'm asking you. Do they put the cuffs on in a criminal arrest as opposed to a civil arrest?
As for all of this talk about "cease and desist", there is any easy way to make that happen. Pay Robert Atchison the money you owe him. If you are going to defy the Texas courts in this matter, you don't really have the right to ask him to stop collecting it.
RJ
Oma, don't you get it?? No you don't.
NOBODY believes you that you "filed complaints" with the police.
NOBODY believes the police are doing ANYTHING, because, frankly, they aren't. Nobody hears from them. The don't contact any of us.
YOU have made that same statement "I have filed a complaint with..." literally HUNDREDS of times over the last decade and you know what?
NOTHING EVER HAPPENS.
Nothing ever will.
So, why should we care? We don't. Count on that.
Hamou posted:
"because of my being evicted by Mr. Cowan"
I see.
And just why were you evicted by Mr. Cowan?
So many postings in your forum, so many threats, so many lies.
Look, Hamou it's easy, just come to Austin on February 17th and talk to the judge, explain things to him or her. Explain why you have ignored and defied court order after court order. Bring your friends from the FBI, LA and Palmdale law enforcement; with such powerful supporters surrounding you the judge will be certain to listen!
To make it even more convincing you can bring the "Elders of your Church", Snoopy, Justin Edwards, Jim Sproul, Michele Biernat - what a crowd!
I have always found it odd that none of these people is ever in court with you. Still, bring them all to Austin on February 17th.
Will Roger be hearing from your new Austin attorney, Richard Gentry? Will he be representing you now?
Oma Hamou, I will never stop the legal process to enforce my judgment against you. I don't have to worry about the court costs - it's all about justice now. If you end up in jail you will only have yourself to blame.
Richard Gentry? The criminal defense attorney who specializes in DUI cases?
Isn't he the Travis County prosecutor who had to resign when he was arrested in March 2009 for DUI himself?
How did Hamou find him? Through Curt Baggett?
Oh, my dears. How very clever of Ms. Hamou / McConnell / Murphy / Moran to call a lawyer who has himself had personal experience of being in jail. I'm sure it will deepen his understanding of her woes and worries.
Now, if she could just find an attorney who constantly gets his checkbooks mixed up, who has a probation violation or two under his belt, who knows the inconvenience of a string of back-to-back evictions, and who knows what it's like to lose a judgment now and again (well, pretty much always, but you do get my point, my sweets). Perhaps such a sympathetic attorney could help her fashion a strategy for the 17th of next month.
We all need someone who understands us, my dears. Do try to keep that in mind.
While you're at it Oma. Hows about you EXPLAIN just exactly WHY you refused to buy Patrick's house "because he threatened you" BUT
YOU STILL LIVE THERE? You don't pay him rent...you believe you have the RIGHT to live in somebody's house RENT FREE every month. You say "I paid him months ago" but you ARE NOT PAYING RENT NOW. Did you pay for January 2012? no December 2011...no, November? no...
October, no..
I could go on...
What ever happened to that $145,000 you said you had and were spending with lawyers? THAT lie was MONTHS ago now, so where is that huge lawsuit?
OH wait, NO, right, you SAID you were paying Bob the full judgment THEN going to get it back with the lawsuit.
Have you paid Bob? No...
Of course not. All lies. Just like the LIE that Father Markell still answers you. HE DOES NOT! We heard directly from him.
PROVE OTHERWISE OMA. You won't. You lie.
Let's serve up some Humble Crow Pie to Oma Hamou:
by Oma Hamou on Fri Nov 18, 2011 11:38 am
I will allow the District Court Judge in Austin decide on how I should structure my settlement payment plan to you on a judgement you got by committing the crime of fraud and perjury. :wink:
and the Court said "You are ORDERED BY THE COURT TO ANSWER ALL DOCUMENT PRODUCTION AND DEPOSITION BY QUESTION REQUESTS OR PAY UP IN FULL".
by Oma Hamou on Fri Nov 18, 2011 6:38 pm
You may have won but it isn’t over. I have to pay you on the 2005 judgment you got against me because you committed the crime (s) of fraud and perjury but isn’t over. I have filed criminal charges against you and I intend to sue in civil court for defamation, libel, conspiracy etc. and force you to prove your words.
STILL waiting for Bob to be PAID... not to mention hearing from ANY law enforcment people, much less that PROMISED lawsuit...
Postby Oma Hamou on Sat Nov 19, 2011 12:01 am
Even though I am forced to pay, it is not over,
STILL WAITING on that payment...
by Oma Hamou on Mon Nov 21, 2011 12:53 pm
I am filing a criminal complaint on all of you.
STILL waiting...
by Oma Hamou on Tue Nov 22, 2011 9:27 am
I am being forced and persecuted on the web on a daily basis to pay an unjust judgment that was acquired through fraud and deceit to Bob Atchison. I will pay this, however, I do intend to file a civil suit and expect to be victorious. Not only will I get my money back but also additional sums for damages. In our next litigation you will have to prove Bob, everything you have published about what happened at trial where you used that fake document in convincing a jury to award you the judgment. I want you to know in the criminal complaint I have filed against you I have asked law enforcement to investigate the fraudulent judgment because it is one of several things of how you have committed crimes against me
STILL waiting...
by Oma Hamou on Tue Nov 22, 2011 9:49 am
As a side note to Patrick and his friends in Austin and elsewhere: I have made a criminal complaint of your violating the restraining order. I have attached the web postings that state law enforcement is aware of your constant surveillance and running license plates. They advised me that such activities are a violation of the law, not to mention the court order. Law enforcement will decide if the case should be prosecuted as a misdemeanor or as a felony
ACTUALLY OMA, Law enforcement DID NOTHING about it.
by Oma Hamou on Tue Nov 29, 2011 11:45 am
I am going to pay the judgment he got against me because he committed the crime of fraud and perjury but remember this: I will get it back. I will. You'll see. :P
STILL waiting...
Postby Oma Hamou on Wed Oct 19, 2011 9:36 am
In this past few weeks I have hired 2 Texas attorney and Bob Atchison and Rob Moshein hiding behind the fake web accounts they have created on Rob's libelous site about me have and continue to publish the lie, I haven't. Yesterday, I spent the day talking with both the Texas attorney and the California law firm who believes like the Texas attorney I should file my civil lawsuit in Texas.
TRUTH was you only HIRED ONE attorney, Shane. NO LITIGATION ever materialized.
by Oma Hamou on Tue Oct 25, 2011 10:03 am
As to the pending civil lawsuit, it is fact. I suggest you contact my Attorneys there in Austin and they will confirm to you my plans of proceeding forward with this new litigation. :wink:
WE DID. There WAS NO LITIGATION! Still waiting tho...
by Oma Hamou on Tue Oct 25, 2011 1:57 pm
My attorney has told me the Texas law you published has no bearing whether I file tomorrow a civil lawsuit against Bob & You. ...Yes, I am looking forward to our next round of litigation!
YOU FILED NOTHING.
by Oma Hamou on Wed Oct 26, 2011 12:20 pm
I will get the chance to show the court and law enforcement in our pending civil litigation, you won because you are a dishonest human being who is obsessed with me. :wink:
THREE MONTHS and still nothing is "pending"
by Oma Hamou on Wed Oct 19, 2011 11:11 am
I may end up paying that judgement Bob got against me by committing the crime of fraud and perjury but its not going to be over with, I am going to make both you and him pay for the harm your lies have caused me. I am going to use the money I would have used as a down deposit to purchase a new home and fight the two of you, and I will win! :P
The TRUTH was you DID NOTHING OF THE SORT...
Postby Oma Hamou on Wed Oct 19, 2011 1:46 pm
I don't want to pay this because you got a judgement against me because you lied and committed the crime of fraud. If I must pay, I will but I will get it back through my civil lawsuit against you and Rob and you will have to pay more to your attorney. :P
YOU MUST PAY IT! The Court AND your lawyer Shane TOLD YOU SO. Still waiting...FOUR months now...
Postby Oma Hamou on Thu Oct 20, 2011 1:53 pm
If I must pay on a judgment you got by lying and creating a fake document I will make certain you pay triple that amount in legal fees and damages to me and it will happen. :P
I am having a fantastic day and am looking forward to your having to ANSWER my civil lawsuit which is coming your way...
hmmm "coming our way"? must have gotten lost in the mail...
Postby Oma Hamou on Thu Oct 13, 2011 12:02 pm
One attorney said the case should be filed in Federal while the other believes it should be filed in State Court. When you are served with the legal papers then you will know. :P
Interesting that NEITHER filed ANYTHING ANYWHERE!
Postby Oma Hamou on Wed Oct 12, 2011 10:29 am
I have a busy day at the computer extracting your lies so those lies can be incorporated into my lawsuit that is going to be filed against you and Bob and anyone else who has participated or continues to participate on any of the libelous sites you have created about me as well as stalking me at your request. :P
I am confident Bob my attorney will represent my best interest at that hearing and he will let the court know about the pending civil lawsuit where I am going to force you to prove everything you published on the web about what happened at trial in 2005 when you won your judgement against me.
well THAT didn't happen. In FACT Shane ended up having to tell Judge Livingston that he "had absolutely NO EXCUSES why Oma Hamou was REFUSING to comply with Court Orders!"
Postby Oma Hamou on Wed Oct 12, 2011 12:30 pm
As for the hearing on Bob's Motion for Contempt, I am not worried. I will have an attorney who will attend the hearing and will represent my best interests. I have full confidence in his representation. :D I am not worried as my Texas attorney will represent me and I will be fine. :P
Yeah, you LOST that hearing. ANOTHER COURT ORDER against you.
Postby Oma Hamou on Wed Oct 12, 2011 4:54 pm
I look forward to my lawsuit which will be filed in California on both Bob and you and any other of your ilk as finally, I will be totally vindicated and the two of you and the rest of your ilk will be exposed as to what you are! :P
Yeah, WHATEVER happened with that?
Seriously Oma. You really DON'T understand why nobody believes a WORD you say?
Look at the months of LIES and deceit and frankly, self delusion...
Really, Oma. Let's say that I allow Rob to post the original letter Fr. Markell left for me in St. Petersburg. You will simply scream that it is a fraud anyway, so why bother. Trust me, if there is ever litigation about this --- and Rob's posts pretty much demolish the idea that will happen --- it will be produced. In court. Perhaps with Father Markell, along with a parade of people that will be happy to testify against you. Do you honestly think that if they were summoned, people like the Mortons, Cowan, Refai, all of the vendors you have stiffed, Patrick O'Connor, etc. would not show up? You have been ordered by the court and advised by your own attorney --- at least he was your attorney when he advised you --- to pay Bob Atchison what you owe him. You've been screeching like a banshee about the difference between a civil and a criminal warrant, but I assume that Mr. Gentry was able to inform you that both are serious matters? Or did he tell you that you can safely ignore a court? Because if he did, girlfriend, you may want to rethink all of your nonsense about how Rob's legal advice is inept.
Off to walk Frobe in the snow. Brr.
Rebecca
Hamou posted:
"a bench warrant on a civil case is different than a bench warrant in a criminal case"
Really?
How do they differ? Both result in your arrest if you encounter the police after they issue.
And remember, the warrant will be issued under all of your known aliases.
Time to start working on a new ID. Tatiana is a nice name.
Hamou posted:
"You mean the names you claim I have used yet failed miserably to prove to law enforcement I have."
I haven't tried to prove anything to law enforcement.
I simply know there are court records where you are named as a litigant under the names of Oma Hamou, Oma Demian, Alexandra McConnell, Oma McConnell, and Alexandra Moran -- the names by which you introduced yourself to the plaintiffs.
And your credit report obtained through discovery adds more names to that list.
And the Mortons add more names to that list.
And investigative reports add more names to that list.
I will have to prove nothing about your names should the need arise. The court records, credit agency records, investigative reports, and other witnesses will do it quite adequately.
Really, it will be a very colorful and fun-filled trial with a jury seeing the mechanics put in place piece by piece in anticipation of a lifelong career of running low-rent con games.
I know that the interminable back and forth on these blogs make things look confusing. But, in fact, we have our own "legal time line", and once the evidence of your maneuvers is laid out in sequence, a very simple and straightforward story emerges.
A judge and jury will read you for exactly what you are without any difficulty at all.
Just remember, Hamou. If you ever enter a courtroom with a claim of being libeled, you will confront a string of witnesses who will look at you and tell the judge and jury, "yes, that's the same woman who introduced herself to me as ......... [and a string of different names will emerge]."
And you will be confronting numerous witnesses who will testify to the judge and jury, "yes, she gave me a bad check, claiming ........... [and a string of different but similar excuses will emerge]."
And so it will go, across your movie scam, across your rental history, across your "banking" history.
And there will be documentary evidence in which your credit report will be compared to your mortgage loan application which will be compared to your federal tax return which will be compared to your sworn bankruptcy petition.
And there will be years of emails from people who have reported being victimized by you and lied to by you.
And, of course, don't forget those wonderful little episodes where you barely escaped death on 9/11 and where legions of your business associates were killed in the collapse of the towers. (You will really endear yourself to a jury by your using 9/11 as a stage prop for your scams.)
You may stand in front of some judge right now and get to tell only your side of the story. But when this famous trial comes that you keep tossing around, there will be many, many other people on hand to tell their stories of their encounters with you.
Then we'll see how things go. And, finally, it will all be in a court record instead of just in an internet blog.
Regarding the "Elders of the her Church" for once Oma Hamou was right. I was able to contact the Church of Satan in Los Angeles and they knew Oma Hamou right away.
Magistra Simona Callow, Magistra Templi Rex in Palmdale knew Oma Hamou immediately and reports she has held the title of Haidmaiden of Satan (H.O.S.) for many years. She wrote:
Oma Hamou, the beautiful film actress, philanthropist and author who took Hollywood by storm, has been ordained Haidmaiden of Satan (H.O.S.) not only because she has knowledge, but because she has also applied it to honing her talents and using them to make a mark on the world itself. This is a great deal to ask of people, but we require no less for official designation as Handmaiden of Satan (H.O.S.). The Priesthoods of other religions require years of study and apprenticeship, so it shouldn’t come as a surprise that we also have exacting standards. We are a worldwide religious and philosophical movement, and we will not lower our standards to accommodate over-eager neophytes. Oma Hamou, H.O.S., is no such newcomer, no such neophyte. We definitely endorse her work and her activities. She, Our Red Princess, is in our prayers constantly. As far as we are concerned she is "too cool" for words.
Official statement of support:
Oma Hamou, H.O.S., who is is fighting like a lioness for justice and global goodwill, is congratulated on her recent recovery from cancer. The Church of Satan also wants to give wholehearted endorsement and belief in her ultimate victory over her deranged and obsessed stalkers around the country. They are liars.
The Church of Satan has shown its support in of Ms. Hamou, H.O.S., in many ways. Our loan of $50,00 for Ms. Hamou's recent emergency cancer treatment was one. Ms. Hamou is also in the process of purchasing a building from the Church and we wish her much happiness in her new home.
The COS supports investigating Hamou's stalkers and obsessive liars from the Alexander Palace Time Machine who have stalked her for years.
Law enforcement in Texas and California believe her. They know why, for 9 years, they have falsely accused Hamou of committing crimes or being involved in criminal activity. She has never been arrested or charged and this proves their just a Group of Liars who have a vendetta against her.
We are praying for you, Ms. Hamou, do not loose heart!
Mangus Madison Thompson
COS Official Press Secretary
hmmm. a MOST interesting hit according to Google Analytics. Seems somebody in Torrance California googled the terms "Advanced Paralegal Services" impersonated a lawyer
remember Hamou was IN that black suburban belonging to Advanced paralegal services and being driven by morbidlyobese debbie...
and Hamou used to be a paralegal...
Just posted on the Oma Hamou Forum:
MOnday Morning and Team Moonshine and Atchidogturd are still spewing crap! You are just so jealous of Ms. Hamou, her Global Success and that boodidelicious butt of hers. If I were into women I'd fall for that sexy babe in a second.
Moonshine and Atchidogturd, are you THAT destitute you have to keep this sort of crap up in your attacks on this innocent woman?? Guess your face is falling off, you aren't getting any, your gay and you're business is failing, etc. that you have to resort to this sort of crap. Oh, and that you certainly ENJOY stalking and harrassing.
Well, I'll be dining on roasted free range stuffed Gooey Duck for lunch and attending the next University of Oregon football game in Autzen stadium with my husband on Saturday - GoDucks!
Russophile
Darlings, did you miss me?
Darling Mrs. Biernat, if it really is you, darling, because darling Rivka keeps telling me that you're darling Omele, darling, because even though you now mention whatever you're stuffing your face with every time you post, you still can't get the difference between "your" and "you're" right, darling. Omele, if it is you, have you thought about going back for a GED, darling? It could make all the difference in the world when it comes to landing a good job, darling. All the difference!
I post because I care, darling. So much!
Mitzi Kedem
Oh, my dear Ms. Hamou / McConnell / Murphy / Moran. Please, dear, whatever you do don't take the name of Tatiana, especially if people are going to call you Titi.
I know it's gutter humor, my pet, but I just know young boys would have a field day if they heard you introduce yourself as Titi Hamou.
Why, I'm worried as it is about your even calling your dog. "Here, Titi. Here, Titi" just does not seem to me to be something you want to be calling across the yard.
Even in Littlerock, my sweet.
Regarding a "chance" encounter in Russia, Hamou posted:
"Somehow, the conversation turned to Enigma's film project about Nicholas II and the music"
Did you also whip out that tired old photo of your being beaten black and blue? (You know the one -- where you got beaten in L.A. and rushed straight to an emergency room in Las Vegas and claimed injuries such as being kicked in the stomach with boots that somehow failed to warrant so much as a mention in the doctor's report.)
Or is that just part of the schtick for your U.S. marks?
Uh, Hamou. Who said anything about your being arrested in Nevada?
What made you even jump to such a protestation, since no one here brought it up?
Hmmmm ............
But I'd still be interested in knowing why, after supposedly getting kicked in the stomach by a man wearing boots, the doctor failed to mention as much in an otherwise detailed medical report of your injuries.
Hamou posted:
"That means, the county attorney, law enforcement who took those reports and saw my battered body & face are liars"
I see. So you went to the police and met with a prosecutor about this beating.
So tell us when and where Marcus Demian was arrested for this beating.
Marcus Demian told me that Oma was beaten up 'by a john' - that was his story. Of course I don't know what the true story is, but you are right, Marcus wasn't arrested.
Oma would have had him arrested if she could have. It doesn't make sense that the police or Oma would let him go if there was proof.
There must be a police report. Has Oma ever posted it? If she had it she would have posted it for sure. Does the police report exist? Does it name Marcus? Is this another Oma Hamou hoax? There have been so many.
Let's see if she has that police report. If she can't produce it then Marcus's explanation is more reliable than Oma, who is a proven serial liar.
Hamou posted:
"When I was married to Marcus Demian over 19 years ago, laws concerning domestic violence was a lot different than they are now."
A beating is an aggravated battery, which has been illegal under common law for centuries and has been illegal in every state in this union since its inception. It does not matter whether the beating is delivered by a spouse or not.
Not one state accepts marriage as a defense to an aggravated battery charge. Not today. Not a century ago. Not 19 years ago.
There was absolutely no legal reason why Demian could not be prosecuted for this beating if the police or a prosecutor believed he, in fact, delivered it.
If a prosecutor was pulled into the matter, as you claim, he would have prosecuted the man who delivered such a beating -- if, of course, his identity was known.
Now, if the beater's identity was unknown for some reason, that's another matter.
Hamou, you need to understand something about the public discussion of this beating.
None of us uncovered it and began posting about it out of the blue.
You are the one who carried around a picture of yourself all black and blue and whipped it out in business meetings for some bizarre reason with people you barely knew. You are the one who posted it on the internet. You are the one who brandishes it like some sick badge of honor.
People are not obligated to take you at your word just because you post something. And when you post something as untenable as being beaten in one city and going to an emergency room in another state and claiming injuries that are not reflected in the medical report you posted, you have opened yourself to challenge and speculation.
You keep prattling on about invasion of privacy, but never in my life have I encountered anyone with such a bizarre compulsion to post personal things about themselves on the internet, be it semi-nude and soft-core porn shots; pictures of yourself beaten to a pulp; stories of being pistol whipped by a man whose ninth or tenth wife you were; tales of breast, uterine, colon, and rectal cancer; and so forth.
If you want people to stay out of your sordid life, then keep the creepy thing off the internet.
...and let's not forget the story of the two-headed rape baby...
Oma Hamou insisted I see those pictures when she came to Austin. I didn't want to see them, but she went on and on pushing me until I did. She had multiple sizes of them. She offered to leave me copies.
The story she told me was she had been beaten by her husband and his family set up a $66M trust fund in compensation for it. She told me the family was in pharmaceuticals and that's where they got their money. I believe she said they were Israeli
So, Hamou, since you say I am wrong about aggravated battery, tell us in which state it has ever been legal for a husband to commit aggravated battery against his wife.
Good Lord, Bob.
Multiple sizes?
Passing out copies?
The woman is one sicko.
Oma Hamou says she refuses to post the police report. That means if there is one she has lied about the contents of it, or it doesn't exist.
Period.
You know, Blake, in a couple of weeks Oma Hamou will learn from personal experience whether the bench warrant for her arrest results in her being jailed or not.
Imagine the panic she must be in and she feels justice closing in on her.
Hamou posted:
"why a Los Angeles Superior Court Judge who read some of your web postings called you a liar"
Right. Some judge looked at my posts and called me a "liar" based on nothing more than your say so.
As you should know by now, the test of these claims will be when we are each put to the proof of them in open court with opposing parties present.
And, despite having sued and been sued almost 20 times, you have NEVER prevailed when your opponent was present.
But I anxiously await your proof of the mutually-exclusive claims in your loan application, tax return, and bankruptcy petition.
I anxiously await finding out the flight number that got you from Boston to L.A. on 9/11.
I anxiously await the list of your colleagues who died when the towers collapsed.
I anxiously await the medical testimony about your multiple cancers.
I anxiously await the proof that the FBI has identified me and is investigating any of us.
I anxiously await the proof that Enigma Films had 100 employees.
I anxiously await the proof that you have not used multiple aliases.
I anxiously await the proof of all the things you have claimed about yourself and your accomplishments on the internet for years.
I stand corrected.
Hamou didn't drive from Los Angeles to an emergency room in Las Vegas after her beating.
She drove from Los Angeles to an emergency room in Billings, Montana.
Even further.
Hamou posted:
"Back then if a wife did not want to press charges against her husband for beating her up nothing was done to the husband."
And today, if a wife will not press charges or cooperate with the prosecution, nothing is done to the husband.
It's not the law that's changed. It's the attitude about enforcement.
But you still haven't told me in what state it has ever been legal for a husband to beat a wife.
And Bob is right. You have posted everything you can to damage Demian: court documents about the claims of child molestation; claims that he pistol whipped you; claims that he beat you; claims that you were convicted of felony bad check writing because he reneged on promises to you; claims that you had to violate probation to keep yourself and his children safe.
If there really were a police report about his giving you a beating that sent you to an emergency room in Billings, you would have plastered it all over the internet years ago.
Such an INTERESTING day! Nice and rainy too. Sorry Oma, am still not Blake, but spoke to Blake earlier...
Happy Birthday Patrick. Sorry you have to work today. I'm glad the day started out so well for you though!
Hamou posted:
"Patrick did not lose any money while I have been a tenant in a property he still owns until the house goes up for sale in a Trustee Sale. he has told many people who have signed affidavits he was walking away from it and wanted no part of it"
Here we have a prime example of a narcissistic sociopath's thinking.
Losing rental income that one anticipated and was owed is a loss of money by any reasonable standard.
But more telling is Hamou's assertion that, because Patrick decided to vacate the house, she somehow acquired a right to live in it without his permission and for free.
Even her own attorney warned her not to answer the bank's occupancy questionnaire about her presence there, telling her she could be sued if they knew about her.
Yet Hamou seems to believe her presence there is somehow legitimate. This is pure sociopathic con artist thinking at work.
Postby Oma Hamou on Tue Jan 24,
A report was made. Thanks, Justin!
"Hello Los Angeles Sheriff's Department, Palmdale. Can I help you?"
"Yes, this is Oma Hamou, well Alexandra McConnell...I have a restraining order against Patrick O'Connor. He VIOLATED the order...I want to report it.."
"Well, Ms...whatever, that is serious. How exactly did he violate the order?"
"He contacted my stalkers. They posted about it..."
"OK, really? So what did he say?"
"Patrick didn't post. My STALKERS did. Patrick told them to... They wished Patrick a Happy Birthday...."
"ummmm....."
"My stalkers told Patrick, on their libelous blogs, that they were sorry he had to work on his birthday...you HAVE TO ARREST HIM..."
"ummmm"
"NO NO NO...don't you idiots get it?? My stalker TOLD PATRICK "I'm glad the day started out so well for you"...ITS CODE!!! Patrick TOLD my stalkers to communicate this...IT'S A THREAT! HE VIOLATED THE RESTRAINING ORDER..."
"ummmmm...ok....sure. right"
click.
Hamou posted this excerpt of an email from her attorney:
"This means there is no more case against you and you have the right to possession of the property"
Of course, she is once again editing. As she herself posted earlier, the attorney went on in that same email to warn her not to respond to the bank's occupancy questionnaire but to give them his name, lest she be sued by the bank.
In other words, she only acquired a "right" to remain in the property as regarded O'Connor's abandoning his right to evict her from the property in not pursuing his Unlawful Detainer action. This did not confer any right to remain in the property against the bank's objection. Hence the lawyer's warning about a lawsuit by the bank if she provided them information about her occupancy.
Hamou was and remains a squatter in O'Connor's house.
This notion that with her history of evictions, bounced checks, bad debts, court judgments, and damage to property it is the fault of anyone on this blog that she cannot find new lodgings is typical Hamou obfuscation.
It's like blaming the Iraq War on the newspapers that reported it.
Hamou posted:
"This is absolutely and unequivocally not true and the affidavits from the perspective landlords prove it."
First, I think you mean "prospective" landlords.
But if, as you claim, 13 landlords have turned you down as a renter because of this blog, it is because of the information about your activities reported in the blog.
The mere existence of a blog about you would be of little concern to landlords but for what it revealed about your past evictions, debts, judgments, arrests, convictions, etc.
If you are turned down, it's because of your conduct in the past, not our reporting of it.
You sound like Johnson and Nixon blaming the press for the anti-war movement.
Besides, I seriously doubt you have 13 affidavits from landlords. If you did, we would have seen them posted by now.
You post pictures (old ones, thank God) of your half-covered tits and ass and zippers pulled down almost to your hooch, after all.
Oh, my dear Ms. Hamou / McConnell / Murphy / Moran. I really think you misunderstand Blake's occasional mentions of your body.
Personally, I think he is mostly fascinated by your compulsion to post soft-core pornographic pictures of yourself on the internet. It's really quite odd behavior, you know, especially for a woman who complains of being raped or threatened with rape as often as most people buy groceries.
Surely, my sweet thing, you must realize that men can look at woman's body without finding it the least bit attractive. Why, Mr. A. got that way with that darling but daring actress Edith Massey. He just couldn't take his eyes off her. But honestly, my dear, I really don't think he desired her, if you know what I mean. (Although, I have to admit, after his little interlude with Betty Ford, or whatever her hame is, I'm at a complete loss for what does attract him.)
I have to say, Ms. H/M/M/M, that if you really want people to believe you're a respectable actress and businesswoman who lives in constant fear of sexual assault, you might want to go a little lighter on the shots of partially-exposed lady parts and unzipped pants on the internet. It makes you seem, well, something less than a professional woman. At least the kind of professional woman you want them to believe.
That said, I'm off to the garden. Toodles, my love.
An absolute blizzard of postings in Oma Hamou Sock Puppet Theatre is underway. It's amazing how Hamou can keep it up, switching from one sock puppet name to another - always repeating the same grammatical and spelling errors regardless of which character she is playing at the time.
She knows she does it, she knows that nobody believes there is anyone but her in her forum, and she doesn't care in the least.
As I have posted before she primarily posts for herself, to make herself feel loved and to create an imaginary world where she is surrounded by devoted and admiring friends and supporters.
This is a form of self-induced deception that is like self-hypnosis. The lies she creates, the phony characters cocoon her from reality, which is becoming more frightening and ominous for Oma Hamou.
One cannot discount the use of sock puppets - and her own persona - to hurl threats - much like the way an ape throws feces from its cage at spectators. Revenge is a big - huge really - motivator for Oma Hamou. The sock puppets allow her to hurl vicious, nasty - even obscene - taunts and threats against her victims and anyone who stands up against her.
Snoopy-who-is-Oma, in particular, reminds me of that creepy little sidekick of Jabba the Hutt, Salacious B. Crumb.
BTW there was more proof recently that Russophile-who-is-Oma does not live in Portland. I won't say what is was, let's see if Oma can figure it out on her own.
Blake you wrote:
Besides, I seriously doubt you have 13 affidavits from landlords. If you did, we would have seen them posted by now.
Oma Hamou loves the word 'affidavit' and hasmade claims of more than 50 that she has never published.
She thinks that just using the word 'affidavit' will somehow convince us that she has document. Also, using the word increases the 'drama' and makes her feel 'smart'.
We all know she will publish any document she has (or fraudulent document she has created) hundreds of times on the web.
If Oma Hamou doesn't publish an affidavit then she doesn't have it.
She must have figured it out Bob. The "russophile" sock puppet post where she screwed up has been taken down...
Guess she googled what "gooey duck" really WAS LOL...
Well, given her "dungeonous" crab blunder and now the "gooey duck" screwup, one can see why her acting career went where it did.
Of course, she's still got that book in the works for which the publishers are clamoring. It will no doubt be a tour de force of dramatic non-fiction, albeit it a rather ungrammatical one.
Darling, darling Omele,
I'm thinking that darling Blakele has never posted that he is a retired attorney, darling. He has something to do with antiques is what I remember he posted. But darling! If he is old, and he is rich, and if you're right about him being obsessed with your "bum" (darling, how cute, and how lucky that these days there is so much more of it to be obsessed with! Just like my darling Kardashians, but saggier!), then are you thinking what I'm thinking you're thinking, darling? He's a potential mark, darling, just like poor Mr. Morton and Mr. Refai!! Darling, housing problem solved! So just get your gigantic tuchis onto the treadmill (I was sorry to hear about your weak legs after exercise the other day, darling, but let's face it, we're not spring chickens anymore!) and walk, walk, walk your way into darling Blakele's heart. Or at least his checking account and credit cards!
Caring so much, Omele. Caring so much!
Mitzi Kedem
Speaking of ungrammatical, Hamou just posted:
"No one cares if you don't believe it or not, lest of me."
Don't believe it or not? What is it about hillbillies and double negatives?
And lest of me?
Good grief.
The woman writes about as well as she pretends to be from Portland.
I will not let you get away with blaming me for the lies you have posted about Markel. You posted those horrible lies on the web and wrote to officials in Russia with wild claims about him stealing, lying, etc. She sent these messages to his church. You told me he raped you. You and Jim Sproul wanted Markel destroyed.
It didn't work.
They were your lies, Hamou, not mine. I defended him from you.
It is beneath contempt that you try and pin your sins, your lies on others. Every time you do this it only makes me stronger and more determined to see you face justice.
In a few weeks my next goal in the courtroom will be attained and the bench warrant will be issued for your arrest.
I will do everything possible within the legal system to get you to Texas to face justice here. I have the money to do it - whatever it takes - and I am determined to see you submit to the court orders you have received and ignore.
I believe the end result will be your incarceration in Texas for a long time. This will get you off the streets and end your scams (at least for a while).
Of course you can also pay my judgment against you that keeps growing, but you have lied about paying it over and over again. You never will pay it and you will never submit to the courts here in Texas. You, Oma Hamou, are in defiance of the courts, in defiance of the law. It will not end well for you, you will face justice very soon, I promise you.
Hamou posted:
"I have your response on tape"
The woman seems to have generated more tape footage than Aaron Spelling.
According to her, she's taped conversations in courtrooms (which is illegal), in hallways of courthouses, over the phone.
But where does she keep all this stuff?
The same place that mountain of affidavits are filed: in her mind.
Snoopy-who-is-Oma posted:
"Here is a picture of Oma inside her Jaguar"
Sheez. That car was used when she got it and is likely in a junkyard by now. The last car Hamou was seen driving was a 16-year-old Cadillac she borrowed from a tow truck driver.
And why don't Orthodox priests (and the people who visit them) wash and comb their hair?
In any case, when we start seeing that ludicrous picture of Empress Oma trotted out, we know she's run into another of her dead ends.
Lord, Hamou is in full self pity party mode!
The ten zillionth time reposting the tired lame old pictures that purport to "prove" something from over a DECADE ago now...including the 'jaguar' she hasn't driven for years (not listed in the bankruptcy OR loan applications! Nossir, Hamou drives either decade old trucks or twenty year old cadillacs!)
The hideous dress in her Drag Queen Empress photo, all that crap.
What's your life NOW Oma? Not twelve years ago but NOW??
Nobody at ALL cares what you were twelve years ago, when you had all that American Express Card credit you squandered...some FOUR HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS!
What about NOW??
Squatting without paying rent in the desert wasteland of Palmdale, living with a TOW TRUCK DRIVER who doesn't even HAVE A VALID DRIVERS LICENSE! with forty cats, a dozen dogs...a mentally screwed up adult child that YOU made that way who sits in front of a computer all day whacking off to gay porn when you have him drugged up enough to keep him from beating YOU and the cops in his violent rages...
NO JOB!
NO MONEY!!
NO LIFE!!!
THAT is what your life is TODAY OMA HAMOU AKA ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL AKA ALEXANDRA MORAN ETC...
Hamou posted:
"or the BMW you claim I drove to the Lancaster Court House"
I never claimed you drove a BMW to the Lancaster Courthouse.
sorry Oma. Your pathetic attempt to pretend you know stuff, that you really don't, won't work. There is no "report" on my parents, most especially what they thought or said.
I know the truth. I was there. I heard them, saw them and know what they did. You? You know nothing. As usual.
You must really be running scared and totally freaked out by the misery of your life and the kid you screwed up in the head to resort to such a school yard tactic.
Your LANDLORD will gladly testify in Court and produce RECORDS to demonstrate the fact you HAVE NOT PAID HIM rent for the property you squat in.
Just like Eric Cowan will do, Mrs Batchelor and the forged check, Charlane Chipi...
Hamou, I don't know why you think I would be dependent on Patrick O'Connor and/or his friends to get information.
As for proof about the cars you drove from the Lancaster Courthouse, I will have the testimony of a licensed private investigator who is a retired police officer -- someone I suspect the court will find quite capable of getting a car make and license plate correct.
And as for what Eric Cowan will testify to, you are correct that he will testify that you did not pay rent and he had to evict you. He will, however, testify to quite a bit more, including your use of an alias to gain tenancy and your presenting the judge with an altered document.
I have told you before, and I'll say it again. We will have the witnesses, the documents, and the court records to back up our key claims against you -- that you are a career con artist who seeks out victims you think cannot stand up to you for one reason or another, be it age, infirmity, widowhood, difficulty with English, or financial stress.
If you think your sweet, sob-laden, tweety protestations about being an innocent, hard-working woman who is a hapless victim who just happens chronically to confuse checkbooks will stand ground against the evidence we will produce, have at it.
Personally, I can't wait until a jury hears your little Perils of Pauline saga from 9/11. Your cynical use of that horrible national tragedy in a ham-fisted attempt to puff up your own self-importance will show them the true nature of your character.
Hamou, you cannot even remember what you post on the day you post it.
At 2:00 p.m. today you claimed never to have said that I used some O'Connor connection as a means of observing you at court.
But at 10:25 a.m. today you posted:
"I will enjoy learning the identity of the person (s) who was asked by you and your ilk from the Alexander Palace Time Machine history forum to go to the courthouse and spy on me and who told you this crap. Maybe that person is connected to Patrick"
Who cares if you learn the identity of a licensed private investigator who observed you in a public venue? It's what they do for a living, it's entirely legitimate, and a judge has already told you that hearings are open to anyone who wants to attend them to observe the proceedings.
Sheez. You make like it's some big deal.
By the way, in California licensed investigators who pay a special fee are entitled to run license plates for vehicle and ownership information. Nothing the least bit illegal or improper about it.
So there goes another one of your great criminal conspiracies.
Unlike you, I know quite well how to operate within the law to get done what I want done.
You'll see soon enough what I mean.
Hamou posted:
"There are no words to describe how badly I want to reveal your idenity, your address and phone number to the world but I can't. Not right now but when I am told I can, I will!"
Yawn ......................
Hamou, I thought you were going to get my identity from Google ages ago.
You really should. You'd be in for a shock.
Hamou posted:
"Where is those photos???? "
Is?
Hillbilly Hoedown again this afternoon.
Hamou posted:
"Law enforcment has revealed your identity to me as well as the Dossier and such you sent."
Uh, huh.
Hamou posted:
"I can, if you want, go back to every single post you have made and find either grammatical errors or typos or just being plain abusive by SHOUTING WORDS IN ALL CAPS because you have a violent temper."
Okay. I want.
Hamou posted:
"P.S. I am told the email communications you sent helped reveal your identity and the computer used to send those emails."
Yep, I knew it.
If I kept you going long enough this afternoon you'd finally get too far out on the limb with your fishing expedition and say something that I absolutely know to be false.
Moron.
Snoopy-who-is-Oma just keeps digging herself in deeper on her fishing expedition. She posted:
"The Dossier this creep sent was called The Oma Hamou Story"
Again, something I know to be false.
You really need some lessons in bluffing. Moron.
It's amazing how Hamou will lie or obfuscate about things that are proved by court documents.
For instance, she claims she was not forced to move out of the Morton home. Yet California case number PS005693 proves that William Morton filed for a protective order in August 2002 for domestic violence by Oma L. McConnell. Moreover, the petition was filed not just against "Oma L. McConnell", but against the other names she was using while resident in his house: Rebbecca Abramou, Oma Hamou, Oma Chedid, Rebbecca E. Jordan, Oma Matin, and Taylor Jordan.
For instance, Hamou says she was not sentenced in March 1993 in Montana. No one said she was. They said she pled guilty on March 31. Court records prove she was subsequently sentenced to 10 years of probation, an extraordinarily long term for what she claims was a simple bad check.
For instance, Hamou argues she was not evicted by Cowan for writing him checks on closed and empty accounts but instead for failing to pay rent. Well, the nitwit overlooks the fact that the failure to pay rent was the result of the bank's refusal to honor the checks she was passing.
For instance, Hamou says Jim Sproul never leased a car from BMW. Well, no one said he leased the car. Pacific BMW sold the car on a brokered deal, and its purchase was financed through BMW Credit.
I could go on, but what's the point? Hamou is a master of trying to twist things to make herself appear innocent.
But the fact remains we can prove she has used multiple aliases.
We can prove what happened between her and the Mortons.
We can prove the conviction history and the numerous civil judgments we have laid at her door.
We can prove that she filed a false mortgage loan application, a false tax return with the lender, and a false bankruptcy petition.
We can prove her claims about Enigma Films are false.
We can prove that she scammed numerous people with her ponzi movie project.
We can prove that she is a career con artist.
And she knows it.
Blake,
Oma Hamou is crazy, but not always that stupid, despite the appearance of idiocy due to the horrible grammar and hillbilly spelling.
She KNOWS full well she never "leased" the BMW. which is why she says so...despite the fact one "Alexandra Moran" took over payments on a BMW that subsequently went missing...
She KNOWS full well she had no VIABLE movie project, so she just says "project". Well any moron can have a binder full of paper with words on it and call it a script...hell there are probably twenty THOUSAND projects in LA right now...but less than TEN will actually become a motion picture and less than HALF of those will turn a profit.
Notice she never says she is CURRENT in rent to Patrick just she paid him "rent previously"...
She plays with words, thinking people are dumb enough to believe her. They aren't.
Which, of course, is why we have never heard from "Law Enforcement" and my FBI record obtained under the FOIA shows NOTHING.
Heck for fun I called the LASD yesterday and guess what? NO COMPLAIANTS FILED WITH MY NAME ON THEM!
Go figure.
She lies, she twists words to have the appearance of not lying, but she knows what she is doing.
Which of course, is scamming people and the system at every turn.
See you in Court on the 17th Oma, when the Judge has to hear you refused to obey a FIFTH court order!
The fishing expedition continues this morning over on the "Ask Oma" forum. But if it makes Hamou feel better, then she might as well have at it.
Her real problem, though, doesn't involve guessing games. It involves flouting multiple court orders, an existing contempt of court ruling, and the looming risk of a bench warrant in Texas.
On another note, Hamou, you claim we take partial truths and distort them into heinous acts.
Why don't you walk us through an example of just how we do this?
Let's take the Hamid Refai case as the example. We say you and James Sproul conned Hamid Refai out of some $50,000, resulting in his obtaining a judgment against you.
You say not.
Why don't you explain what really happened in that case, why Refai sued you, and how he got his judgment.
Did someone steal your and Sproul's identities? Did Refai commit perjury? Did Sproul do it by himself?
Really, let's see just how kernels of truth are distorted to make you out to be a con artist instead of the sweet, unassuming victim you profess to be.
And when will we get to meet Anastasia Davis in court? We're looking forward to introductions all around.
Nobody ever SAID you "leased" a BMW Oma. You took over the payments on a PURCHASE, not a lease, under the name of Alexandra Moran...
Funny, by the by, that your CREDIT REPORT never showed you LEASING a vehicle in your credit history. Wonder howcome?
Blake, SEE how Hamou plays with language but manages to LIE?
she said "You can't prove I signed a car lease under the name of Alexandra Moran" in response to my saying:
Nobody ever SAID you "leased" a BMW Oma. You took over the payments on a PURCHASE, not a lease, under the name of Alexandra Moran.
ah the old Oma Hamou ADMISSION of the truth "You can't prove it"...
Which is what she always says when caught red handed. She doesn't say "I never took over payments" she just says "You can't prove it."
Like she said in court about Scot Landerstessee getting stiffed on the fake Malibu party...
I have his emails...
Hmmmm. Hamou has put up three posts since I brought up the Refai case, yet she ducks the questions.
We say Hamou conned Refai out of about $50,000. Refai says the same thing and has a court judgment to back it up.
Yet Hamou says we take half-truths and turn them into unsavory deeds.
Okay, then, Hamou. What is the full truth of the Refai case?
Why did he sue you? How did he obtain a judgment in his favor?
Here's your chance to set the record straight to the public.
Why, I'll bet even Anastasia Davis will find the answers interesting.
Oma, if you are going to impersonate my BFF, I think that you should minimally make an effort to spell her name correctly.
Even better than that, she emailed me last year about something that actually wasn't related to you. Care to tell me what it was?
And Blake is in antiques. I am sitting here looking at a Lalique vase that he sent me for Christmas, girlfriend. It's quite pretty, I must say.
And why not come clean about the Refai matter, just to correct Blake if he is wrong. I take it the judgment is yet another example of the Legal System's Conspiracy Against Oma Hamou?
Rebecca
And now two more posts from Hamou on the "Ask Oma" forum ............ and still not a word about the Refai case.
Now why would she be ducking it? Doesn't she want to get the truth out for all to see?
As for the credit report, a judge signed a subpoena. The lender duly delivered documents to O'Connor's attorney in response. The court has a procedure for requesting that subpoenaed documents be kept confidential. No such request was made of the court. O'Connor was therefore entitled to make those documents available to whom he pleased, as they were evidence in a court case which, as all evidence in court cases that is not specifically ruled confidential by the court, is a matter of public record.
Litigants in court cases routinely release autopsy reports to the press. Drug and alcohol test results routinely get released to the press. That's sort of the point of court proceedings and the evidence they involve being public in this country.
Good luck with your "fraud" case.
Yet another post from Hamou, and still no answers to why Hamid Refai sued her for over $50,000 and how he won the lawsuit.
Hamou, you say we turn half-truths into tales of misdeeds. So where are the half-truths in our claim that you conned Refai? And what, then, is the full truth?
A flat denial explains nothing, and you know it.
Here's your chance. Demonstrate how our claim that you conned Refai is a half truth.
Regarding whom Hamou thinks may be Blake Springpasture, she posted:
"he is a retired attorney. I know this to be a true and correct fact."
But, Hamou. I thought you claimed earlier that this person neither went to law school nor was admitted to the bar. So how can he be a retired attorney?
You seem awfully confused. Has the Refai matter got you a bit rattled today?
Could Anastasia Davis perhaps help you out a little?
Hamou posted:
"The problem with all of this is the attorney who got those documents was not the attorney in the Unlawful Detainer matter."
Well, then, the judge should not have issued the subpoena if the wrong case was before him. But he did.
Them's the breaks, Chippy.
Oh, Hamou. You just keep barking up the wrong tree.
I am not a retired attorney, and I will be able to prove it. But I know some pretty good ones. Nice people, for the most part.
But WHY are you letting this opportunity slip to demonstrate to us all just how our claim that you conned Hamid Refai is not true?
Can Anastasia Davis help you with that one?
Oh, right, I forgot. Your latest round of cons (Batchelor, Refai, Cowan, O'Connor, et al.) occurred after Ms. Davis closed up shop when her forum didn't turn out quite as she expected when she used it to launch her attacks on the Alexander Palace Forum and Mr. Moshein.
I guess she just didn't realize what could be found out and made public about you.
Russophile-who-is-now-Hamou posted:
"Stephens birthday is coming up."
Hamou, you really ought to work on when and when not to use an apostrophe. It gives you away every time.
Darling, you got Lalique? Not for nothing, Blakele, and I did like the Wedgewood sugar bowl, darling, but come on!! Lalique!!!!
My birthday is coming up soon, forget about whoever Stephens is.
And Rivka, darling, you're right and I admit it. Never let it be said that Miriam Kedem does not admit it when she is wrong! Sort of like darling Omele, who always puts the nice smiley face at the end of the sentence. Anyway, is is Oma pretending to be your galpal.
By the way, everyone, did you know that "Oma" means "Leader" in Indian? Isn't that interesting? Did you know that "Fuhrer" means "Leader" in German? And "Hamou" means "Grifter" in English?
Darlings, it's an education on this website!
Mitzi
Russophile, who is Michele Biernat of Benefit Design Group in Portland, just posted:
"Becuase Blakey poo has had a direct hand in harrassing and stalking and that IS criminal behavior. And didn't Hernandez accuse him (gomer) of being a criminal? (or so Gomer says) Sort of a moot point after that."
Very interesting. I will let the plaintiff in the Hernandez case know that Biernat has just accused him of being a criminal.
My guess is he will be on the phone to a Portland law firm on Monday about filing a libel suit against both Biernat and the company whose internet account she uses in her postings.
As Hernandez found out to his dismay (and the two lawyers I hear he's already gone through in trying to get represented) it takes an actual conviction to support a claim that someone is a criminal, not the assertion of some con artist on the internet. If such a conviction cannot be produced, then it is libel per se.
Way ahead of you, Blake. I sent a copy of Russophile's post to Mr. Pyles, and recommended that before he engages a lawyer, he contact Joel Biernat directly. He sent back word that he was reading it.
Rebecca
Darlings! So exciting! Lawsuits everywhere, darlings! I had to tweet about it!
So when are we going to hear how our claim that Hamou conned Refai is a half-truth?
C'mon, Hamou. Hop to it.
Or does something else have you tied up right now?
Fascinating. Pyles just copied me on an email he is sending to Joel and Michele Biernat. If she has actually posted what "Russophile" posted on Oma's site, game on. He will file a lawsuit against Michele Biernat and the company whose computer she used to post it.
Can I just say that Mr. Pyles is a man of action? No wasting time on internet forums for him!
RJ
Oh my G-d! So exciting!
Dear Oma,
I'm not sure you understand the situation. "Russophile" (who I am sure is you, but that's another story) posted that Mr. Pyles is a criminal. In order for this not to be slander, he has to have been convicted. The fact that he may have done things you don't like is not the same thing as being a convicted criminal. My impression from the email Mr. Pyles sent me is that he is seriously annoyed, and apparently he has a track record of taking action when he is annoyed. My guess is that if you continue to print statements that he is a criminal, he will sue you too.
Rebecca Jordan
Wow - in any case Oma Hamou and Biernat are in for BIG TROUBLE now...
the TRUTH is going to come out now...
Hamou, I'm afraid Russophile's goose is already cooked.
You keep saying I'm a lawyer. Well, I'm pretty sure that to call someone a criminal, one has to show proof of a criminal conviction. (You know what those are, huh, having had a few yourself.)
I'd suggest that you ask all your police friends to get cracking with those criminal charges against Pyles and to get him convicted ASAP if you and Russophile are going to keep claiming he's a criminal.
But, as I said, Russophile's goose is already cooked, as I'm under the impression that Mr. Pyles has no conviction history at all as of right now.
Now, where are those answers about Refai?
Anastasia Davis and I are both waiting.
I just got off the phone with Michael Pyles (I included my number when I emailed him). He will take his counsel from the law firm in Portland he intends to engage on Monday. But he did want me to thank you for including the link to the Duke alumni website naming him as the retired lawyer you are claiming is Blake Springpasture. He doesn't think the lawyers will have too much trouble with this case.
The email was addressed to Joel Biernat, whose name has been removed. Mr. Pyles will telephone Mr. Biernat on Monday to discuss this matter with him, as his company will be named in the lawsuit along with Mrs. Biernat.
By the way, my own legal friend --- Richard DiCastelis --- has long taken an interest in this thing, and since my retirement I have talked to him several times about it. He is a regular visitor to Oma's site as well as this one. I forwarded the email I sent Pyles to him as well, and he just texted me, and I quote: "OMG, ths shit is going to hit the fan."
Oh, girls, girls, girls.
I thought Hamou had reached the depths of stupidity when she put herself back under the jurisdiction of Texas courts with that Bill of Review.
Now comes Russophile, someone with actual assets who can be located and served, calling Pyles a criminal.
Manna. Total manna.
Oma Hamou, you have no idea what trouble you are in now. It will soon be proven if Michelle Biernat really posts in your forum - or if Russophile is really you.
Your whole sock puppet theatre is about to blow up in your face.
Dear Oma(and don't think I don't appreciate you're now referring to me as Dear One, but you're still as dumb as a bag of hair),
I have no idea if Mr. Pyles has done anything that you accuse him of doing, but I do know that it doesn't matter. Do you have a criminal record of convictions for him? About anything? No? Then it's libel, dear.
Unlike your record, which is plastered all over the internet.
And now you've plunged the Biernats and their company into a lawsuit. Good going, Oma.
Rebecca. The Dear One.
Could it be that the Biernats never have really existed and were always inventions of Hamou?
Darlings, I am sitting here with a glass of tea, GLUED to the screen!
Folks, just found some interesting case law right out of Oregon regarding libel:
"A person who is not directly named in the defamatory statement may still bring suit if he or she can prove that persons hearing the remarks would understand them to refer to the plaintiff."
As I said. Biernat. Goose. Cooked.
Hmmmm.
Forget all Michele Biernat's delight at the opportunity to prove I'm a criminal. I wonder how Joel Biernat is going to like having his company dragged into this.
Is he also a big Oma fan?
Let's hope so.
No, Bob, there is a Michele Biernat (and will everyone, including "Russophile" who is really Oma, please learn how to spell the woman's name!)But yes, this is very interesting.
You do all realize that by the time this case gets to trial, Oma Hamou (who is already under a contempt of court ruling) will likely be under a bench warrant -- or in the pokey.
Oma, Richard said to tell you that there is no Oma Hamou ever on record as having appeared in a single movie or television show. But of course you did, didn't you? There was no Enigma with one hundred employees, was there? But of course you claimed there was. There was no . . . well, you get the idea. Trust me, there is a Richard DiCastelis, and he is a lawyer. But he isn't the one who is going to sue the Biernats. Or you, if it comes to that.
Rebecca Jordan
He's going to call, and he's going to sue.
Also, it doesn't matter that it doesn't matter to me. No conviction, no criminal record, no criminal, hello, libel lawsuit. And your own record was plastered all over the internet by the legals systems in which you became entangled.
Uh, Hamou. I think you've gotten yourself all confused again.
Let's look at Russophile's post again:
"Becuase Blakey poo has had a direct hand in harrassing and stalking and that IS criminal behavior. And didn't Hernandez accuse him (gomer) of being a criminal?"
As Biernat well knows, it was Mike Pyles that Hernandez accused of being a criminal, not Blake Springpasture or anyone else.
There was no "if" about her identification in this sentence of Blake Springpasture as being Mike Pyles, who she says is a criminal.
I refer you again to that interesting little passage from Oregon libel law.
Biernat. Goose. Cooked.
Looks like Biernat-Hamou are thumbing their nose at Pyles and defying him to do something. Big trouble is brewing.
Regarding Pyles telephoning Joel Biernat, Russophile posted:
"he already knows about Team Moonshine and what they've done. Mr. Pyles phone call will only confirm what I've told him about them"
Well, that should make the call much more efficient. They won't have to spend much time going over the background.
I guess it'll come down to whether Joel Biernat wants to get his company dragged into this.
I had been thinking today was Saturday, and then someone reminded me it is Friday. So Russophile's post came during business hours. It'll be interesting when we hear where it originated.
(But, by golly, Russophile. I thought at least you knew when to use an apostrophe to indicate the possessive form.)
Wow, this all sounds just like Pseudo Rev Hernandez, just BEFORE Mike Pyles sued him for defamation.
Seems clear to me. "russophile" said it was "Blake" who was a criminal, then published a link establishing Mike Pyles was "Blake".
Pretty much slam dunk. Just ask Hernandez...
Wonder how much money Joel will have to pay the lawyers to clear this all up, what with his employee Michele using Benefit Design Group computers during business hours to commit the defamation, not to mention his role as supervisor/ respondeat superior for his employee, and of course for Michele herself.
Won't be inexpensive...
Seems it will happen though. The taunts and threats by Hamou and "russophile" probably won't help matters either.
Should be one fun train wreck to watch though!
Can't WAIT for Beirnat to either be dragged into Court and forced to comply with all kinds of Discovery production, computer records, emails, phone records with Hamou...or for her to 'fess up and throw Hamou under that big ole bus that Hamou is really the poster behind it all.
Win/win as far as I can see!
Michael Pyles just called me, and it is getting curiouser and curiouser, as Alice used to say. He called Joel Biernat, who disclaimed having received Pyles' email. This is odd, since Michele Biernat was only copied on it, and she certainly received it. Pyles said he seemed angry at the situation, saying that he knew nothing of "that woman" (that would be you, Oma) and that this entire thing had nothing to do with his company --- which is untrue if Mrs. Biernat (oh, BFF!) was posting during business hours from the office. That's the kind of thing that will come out when records are subpoened. Pyles informed him that if he didn't want to discuss the matter, he would transfer the issue to his lawyers. In order to avoid this, Mrs. Biernat (oh, BFF!) will have to either retract the statement --- assuming that she wrote it --- or disavow that the post in question was written by Michele Biernat of Benefit.
Before you deny this conversation transpired, Oma, you may want to remember that Joel Biernat will be asked under oath if it did.
Have some popcorn, Mitzi, it's going to be a long weekend.
Just for the record once more: Mr. Pyles copied me on his email to the Biernats. Blake, you will be interested to know that it was sent to their business address, which explains how Oma received a copy so quickly. I hate to say it, but I think my BFF may have tried to pull the wool over her husband's eyes by deleting it from his mailbox before he could see it. According to Mr. Pyles, Joel Biernat claimed he knew nothing of it.
Rebecca
Well if Michele the brain dead thinks her husband isn't interested in Mr Pyle's damages, I'm rather certain the lawyers for Benefit Design Group an Joel WILL be a tadpole interested in the lawsuit.
Wonder what Joel Biernat will say at his deposition on the subject of Hamou and his wife's defamation during work.
Getting better folks.
Sorry. iPhone autocorrect changed "tad more" to tadpole. Not my doing
Snoopy: Cap'tan Hamou, we have struck an iceberg!
Captain Hamou: Not interested, Snoop, nothing to say about that, I'm off to bed.
Snoopy: But it's huge and the ship is going down! Take a look at it, Cap'tan!
Captain Hamou: Saw it Snoop, not interested.
Who is Mr. russo?
Mr Russo is Joel Biernat owner of Benefit Design Group Portland. Michele's employer and Husband. He will be the one paying all the attorney fees resulting from his employee using business computers to defame Mr Pyles.
Russophile posted:
"I told him [Joel Biernat] I have a copy of the e-mail if he wants to read it"
Why would Joel Biernat need to read Russophile's copy? My understanding is that the email was addressed to Joel Biernat with a copy sent to Michele Biernat.
Did someone in Joel Biernat's office delete the email before he could see it? If so, why?
Pyles says he asked Joel Biernat if he had read the email he had been sent, and Biernat told him he had received no email from him. Pyles said someone must have deleted it, and Biernat told him that no one has access to his email account.
Strange. I wonder if Joel Biernat's email is not as secure from other people in the office as he thinks.
Or is Joel Biernat just feigning ignorance of what his wife posted?
I guess we'll see.
Now that Biernat's back to posting on the "Ask Oma" forum, I wonder if she's gotten caught up on what's been happening with Hamou's famous Bill of Review.
If I remember correctly, Biernat was crowing with delight at the prospect of its being filed and taunting Bob Atchison about being served.
Didn't work out quite the way she envisioned, eh?
She and Hamou -- that's one brilliant pair of strategists.
Oh, Hamou, you might as well calm down and quit trying to backtrack about Biernat's post.
My guess is that Pyles will be as good as his word and let the lawyers handle this going forward.
It'll be interesting to see how Biernat tries to defend herself, though.
She has relatively few choices. She can retract the post and make this go away. She can disclaim having written it and make this go away. She can argue that he does have a conviction history, and that one won't go well for her.
Or she can try to get in all sorts of stuff about you to try to explain her motives. That one would be particularly interesting. Of course, the court would probably disallow it as irrelevant.
But if she did succeed in putting you and your conduct into issue, then Pyles would have to unleash the witnesses and other evidence available to him. And that will send the costs of Biernat's legal defense through the roof (not to mention making her look more than a little odd to a jury for supporting you once it all comes out).
I suspect Pyles is ready for any eventuality, or he wouldn't be launching a suit.
I wonder if the Biernats are ready. Do you think?
This is getting kind of tedious, Hamou.
You can repost Russophile's post as much as you want. The law is quite clear. In order to call someone a criminal with impunity, the person labeled a criminal must have an actual conviction in place at the time. (You know, such as you do.)
It seems that Hernandez' misplaced reliance on the nonsense you post has already gotten him into enough trouble.
I guess it's Russophile's turn, huh?
You really are the gift that keeps on giving.
Oh, here we go with Anastasia Davis again.
Have the police found her yet? You know you're not going to get very far about what happened on that joke of a "history" forum without her to authenticate the contents.
Maybe Pyles can find her.
But if it makes you feel any better to throw all kinds of claims around about Pyles, you go right ahead. I hear he is of the same opinion as Atchison: you have no assets and wouldn't show up in court, anyway. We're seeing enough of that go down in Austin.
Of course, Biernat might find that strategy a little harder to pull off.
We'll see.
Hamou posted:
"IF the author of the web account turns out to be H. Michael Pyles"
I really don't understand why you, of all people, keep stressing the "IF" over and over.
You assured us months ago that the FBI had determined my identity and revealed it to you.
You have been posting in recent days that "law enforcement" has determined my identity by tracking my web traffic and they have revealed it to you.
You have been posting that you are absolutely chomping at the bit to reveal my identity the minute "law enforcement" gives you the go-ahead.
So what's all this "if, IF, IF" claptrap from you?
You have said numerous times you have proof of who I am.
Either you do or you don't. There is no "IF" about it.
Or were you just lying about the FBI investigating my identity and "law enforcement" tracking my web traffic back to a source?
Hamou posted:
"Those claims of mine are a well documented fact created by Mr. Pyles own hand on several websites, in his communications to law enforcement and with third parties all of which I have a copy of."
Big whoop. I seriously doubt if there is anything in whatever you have that has not long since been posted on the internet.
Or is there even more about you that we don't know yet?
Oh, and one more thing ............ you have been posting all day and still haven't explained what the half-truths are about the Hamid Refai case and what the whole truth really is.
Remember, we say you conned him out of around $50,000.
Hamou posted:
"No, Mr. Retired Attorney until I am told I can reveal your identity without hurting the case, I will not do it."
You know, Hamou, you really ought to think things through a bit more before you post.
Your little scenario of all this ominous secrecy makes no sense.
You say you know who I am because law enforcement told you who I am.
Well, obviously I know who I am.
So, if you are to be believed, that would mean you have now told me that law enforcement knows who I am and is investigating me but wants you to keep it secret so that I "dig myself in deeper".
Now, do you see the problem here?
The only conceivable reason law enforcement would want you to stay quiet is to hope I do something compromising while I am unaware they are monitoring my posts.
But you have let that cat out of the bag big time. Whether you post who I am or not, the whole point of any supposed secrecy that "law enforcement" demands from you is utterly defeated.
It's kind of like putting a bug on someone's phone and then taping a warning note to the receiver.
Moron.
Oh, I almost forgot.
Hamou, you say you never received $50,000 from Hamid Refai.
But you still are ducking the key questions:
Why, then, did Refai sue you for over $50,000?
And how did he win the judgment?
(Now, don't let the fact that "law enforcement" is monitoring my posts make you shy about answering. Surely by now we can be frank with each other.)
Blake, she also ducks the question of exactly WHY her signature AND Jim Sproul's signature are on promissory notes for the $50,000, "if" she never got the money.
I"d also love to hear her explain why Thomas Ward is pretty certain his client gave her the $50,000 as well...guess she must be calling Hamid a LIAR!
Say, does anyone else think dinner at the Biernat residence was perhaps a little on the "tense" side of things?
It sure sounded to me that the Biernats were just daring Mike Pyles to sue them. Oh, well, that was a huge mistake. Biernat should have just retracted her statement and made an apology because she is in the wrong. Not doing so will be a costly Biernat mistake. Lawsuits are expensive. Imagine $50,000 down the drain - just in legal expenses and then you might loose. Mike Pyles is not one to back-off and he'll see it through to the end.
Well, Bob, Mike called me last night. He was pretty clear about his conversation with Joel B. He said at first Joel was really confused and had no idea of what was going on...The moment Mike mentioned "Oma Hamou" he said Joel exploded in anger "I don't know anything about that woman. She has nothing to do with me or my business" and essentially hung up on him.
Seems Michele blocked Joel from seeing the email, and hasn't been telling him about her internet "shenanigans" over on the Oma Hamou Forum...
Yep, dinner chez Biernat must have been a doozy last night.
You are quite right Bob, Mike told me that he would pursue the matter.
Well, I hope Mike Pyles is as determined as I have been in my pursuit of justice against Oma Hamou through the American justice system.
It took me a long time to bring Oma Hamou to justice but it is worth it. We have to fight evil in the world wherever we find it. In this case I was Hamou's victim, the court, a judge and a jury saw through Hamou's lies and awarded me the full amount she owed me.
Since then she has defied court orders over and over again. Soon, very soon, I will have the bench warrant for her arrest and I will do everything I can - always through legal means - to get her to Texas and send her to jail where she belongs for as long as possible.
Oma Hamou will never know when it will happen; but she knows I will never stop until she pays my judgment or submits to the orders of the courts in Texas.
I will never go away until I have justice from Oma Hamou.
Snoopy-who-is-Oma posted:
"We ALL post under our own accounts here on this forum!!!! "
So do we.
None of us use accounts we don't own. Passwords, you see.
(And I'm sure Mr. Pyles will appreciate your confirmation that it was Michele Biernat posting yesterday that he is a criminal.)
oh Oma. Get it RIGHT for a change. Mitzi didn't register Rebecca Jordan on twitter.. RJ registered herself on twitter...
Can't you see that?
Thanks, Rob, for alerting me to what Oma Posting as "Snoopy" put up on her site. First of all, girlfriend, you're stalking me. Second, Mitzi didn't create the account, I did. I did it to talk to Mitzi and because she told me that you could get messages from various travel agencies and tours. Since I plan to travel to Russia again this spring, I thought what the hell, why not give it a whirl. Unlike Mitzi, who at least attempted to be friendly with you in what I believe is referred to as the twitosphere (and if you're on it, Oma, it's easy to see why the name stuck), I haven't attempted to contact you. Unless you can set me up with a cheap trip to St. Petersburg, I never will.
Has Mitzi tried to "follow" you again? Why are you "following" her around?
Wow. Hamou and "russophile" have gone silent. What happened to their so sure assertions? Last night was one thing. Today nada. Joel must have stomped on Michele big time. Not surprised. He doesn't seem to be Hamou's friend nearly as well as Braindead Biernat
Hamou posted to Mr. Pyles:
"If you have indeed registered a web account on Rob Moshein's libelous blog about me or are able to access any of those web accounts law enforcement will let me know and in turn it will be known to the world."
???????????
Hamou, you have been posting for months that "law enforcement" already knows who owns this account, that its ipn and computer have been traced, that "law enforcement" has already told you who owns it, and that you have been chomping at the bit to reveal it if only they would give you permission.
Now you're saying "IF" Mr. Pyles registered an account?
My goodness. It seems you've been lying all along.
What a surprise!
Well, not really. You see, we knew you were lying all along, because "law enforcement" cannot obtain any records on this account without a subpoena to the isp which, in turn, would cause them to notify the account owner.
Beyond that, "law enforcement" would take no action without first viewing the blogs of which you complain. There have been a few hits from "law enforcement", but we know the source of every hit, who was hitting, and why. And trust me, it wasn't about any of us.
Given the number of complaints "law enforcement" has on file about you from Huiku Batchelor, Hamid Refai, Monique Hahn, Wild West Productions, the Mortons, Eric Cowan, and Patrick O'Connor, do you really think "law enforcement" is going to waste any resources seeking a subpoena to help you muzzle us from revealing your history to potential victims.
Get real.
It has not escaped our notice that, even with Patrick O'Connor's emails to you (which none of us here encouraged him to write and which we roundly repudiated), you were unable to get criminal charges lodged against him and had to resort to a civil action.
It's quite clear just how sympathetic "law enforcement" really is to this hole you've dug yourself into with trying both to run small-time con games using aliases against hapless victims (which most con artists have the sense to try to do out of the limelight) and create a glamorous persona on the internet of a beautiful Hollywood player of noble sensibilities, great resources, and charitable action.
(And by the way, as Rebecca keeps reminding you, you really ought to learn to spell Biernat's name.)
You know, Hamou, you're being quite a help, although I'm sure you don't realize it any more than you realized the hole you were digging for yourself with that Bill of Review that will soon likely have you under a bench warrant.
You have posted for months now that the FBI is investigating us, that the FBI knows my identity specifically, and that you have filed criminal complaints with "law enforcement" about several of us here.
Yet not a single one of us has heard (nor, I believe, has Mr. Pyles) a word from anyone in any law enforcement agency regarding any complaints that they are investigating against us (except, of course, for that extortion complaint you filed against Rob Moshein which the police dropped as soon as they saw your history.) Much less have any subpoenas been sought to trace web accounts, or charges been filed, or even any looks taken at these blogs by anyone investigating us.
Any reasonable person (including a judge and a jury) would take that as an indication that law enforcement, after months of inactivity since you supposedly filed complaints, does not view any of this as a criminal matter.
Now, given that Michele Biernat and Benefit Design Group, whose internet account she uses, will have to prove not only that "law enforcement" agrees with her that Mr. Pyles has engaged in any criminal behavior against you, she will have to show they actually filed charges against him and obtained a conviction.
Meanwhile, you own posts, by claiming we are under investigation while unable to show any actual police action against any of us, is creating additional evidence with every passing day that the police are not taking you seriously.
I do hope you can kick the police and the courts into quick action before Mr. Pyles discusses a lawsuit against Biernat and company with an attorney in Portland. (Although it may be too late, as I believe she has to produce proof of a conviction in place at the time she made the allegation.)
As it now stands, she's got only your and her opinions to rely upon in making a very serious allegation of criminal conduct.
And those opinions are not going to cut the mustard in court.
Blake, I spoke with Mike Pyles yesterday, and no, he hasn't heard a peep from "law enforcement" either about Hamou's thretened "investigations".
Let's face the reality of Oma Hamou's threats.
For literally YEARS, she has made this same exact claim that "law enforecment" is investigating and totally on "her side". I have them archived going back seven or eight years now.
NOTHING ever happened. When finally pushed to explain it, she admitted she LIED about it, saying she never really pursued it but was only making the threats to try to scare me into stopping the publishing of her sordid criminal record and succession of civil judgments against her, to alert potential new victims to her scams.
As I said, the LASD told me in so many words there was no "investigation" of me, and that if there were, they would have told me and contacted me. Austin Police said the same.
and, the FBI's exact words, again "you would KNOW if we were investigating you."
It's a mystery to me why Hamou would be so hellbent on creating such evidentiary problems for her friend Biernat, leaving her to explain to a court why there has been no action on Hamou's criminal complaints for all these years.
But she wouldn't be the first "friend" Hamou has caused problems.
By the way, has anyone heard from Debbie lately?
Uh, Hamou, if Pyles has sent things to police officers that you say constitute stalking and harassment, isn't it odd that none of those police officers pressed any charges against him -- especially since you seem to be suggesting he is one of the people against whom you've filed criminal complaints?
Or have they pressed charges, and he just hasn't admitted it to us?
Another piece of police inactivity Biernat will have to explain, I suppose.
I don't know exactly what you think Pyles sent to the police, but I can tell you this. If it contained only your conviction, arrest, and civil judgment history, that alone would let the police know what you are all about.
I am curious, though. Did it mention your newest contempt of court citation and your pending bench warrant in Texas?
I think you should send Biernat (both Mrs. and Mr.) what you said Pyles sent to the police.
I suspect their lawyer will try to do anything he can to keep your history out of the trial record, because Biernat's getting herself into a court battle on your behalf is going to look rather stupid. But maybe the Biernats can convince him otherwise.
Another observation, Hamou. I don't really know why Pyles would care whether you think I am he or not. You have known for years exactly who Rob Moshein and Bob Atchison are and what they post, and what have you ever succeeded in doing to them?
For what it's worth, though, he's not on this account.
And one last thing -- you say the police have located Anastasia Davis. What great news! We'll get to meet her at last.
Well, Hamou, I guess Rob, Bob, Pyles, I, and who knows who else will just have to wait to hear from the police.
[sound of fingers tapping .......... and tapping .......... tapping]
Oh, no. Here we have to go again with another English lesson.
Hamou posted:
"I am glad to read you admit Mr. Pyles is somehow connected to Rob Moshein's libelous blog"
No one here admitted any such thing.
It was you, Hamou, who responded to one of my posts in which I mentioned Pyles' name by writing:
"this is very interesting an very helpful for my case against each of you"
So, you see? It was you who posted that you had a case against both me and Mr. Pyles.
Sometimes I don't know whether your memory is that bad, or you just can't express yourself clearly in English.
Probably both.
Oma you are as stupid as Biernat. Nobody said Mike Pyles participated on this blog. Except YOU. Blake pointed out that since YOU said he was then Pyles would hear from the law enforcement YOU insist is breathing down our necks.
Which they aren't.
Oma you deny you are as stupid as Biernat. Fair enough. Who is the more stupid: you or her??
Well Oma you do give Biernat serious competition for mOst stupid. Shes stupid and crazy. You're stupid and delusional Hard to declare a winner
Let's not forget the Hamou-Sproul murder plot against me. Hamou lies about her involvement but the plot was real and she was behind it. Watch for more lies in dozens of postings after she reads this.
I have won against her in court time and time again. Hamou claims that I won my case against her through some sort of fraud, but she told this story to the jury and they did not believe her. It was obvious to the jury that it was Hamou that was lying and they awarded me a judgment for the full amount.
Since then every judge has stood behind me and Hamou has defied them all. In a few days I will have a bench warrant for Hamou's arrest. I will do everything I can to get Hamou to Texas and put in jail once I have the warrant for her arrest.
She can call me a stalker and a criminal all she wants. I don't care how many thousands of postings she puts up against me. I have battled for justice in the courts and I will never stop until Hamou pays the judgment she owes me in full. She can sit in jail until she obeys the Texas courts.
I will contact law enforcement everywhere she goes about the arrest warrant and I will appeal to every court where she appears to have the arrest warrant honored...
Dear Oma,
My BFF's ability to post on your forum has been blocked? By whom? You? Is this to prevent her from publicly disowning the libelous post? Or was it blocked by her husband?
Rebecca
Oma Hamou - you lost your Bill of Review for many reasons, not just one. It was not a technicality as you spin it, and you know it. You lost as you always do, period.
What is the point of posting that same garbage over and over again other than to create a smokescreen for your defiance of the courts?
You should obey the Texas courts - appear in Austin for the next hearing as you have been ordered by the judge.
As Oma Hamou knows that her Bill of Review was denied and dismissed because the basis of her argument included ONLY evidence that was intrinsic to the trial not extrinsic to it. The judge explained this to her and she agreed that the fraud she argued had already been discussed in the trial.
There were other reasons as well that resulted in the complete dismissal and denial of the Bill of Review by the judge. It failed on multiple counts.
Hamou keeps trumpeting this Bill of Review as if her claims had merit. That is a total and absolute lie on her part. She lost completely.
Dear Bob,
That isn't why she is posting so furiously. She is hoping to turn attention away from the fact that Michele Biernat has been removed from her forum. There are two possible reasons for this. Either Mrs. Biernat was going to deny making the libelous statement about Michael Pyles --- which means Hamou herself made it --- or her husband has blocked her ability to post there. I know which one makes more sense to me.
Rebecca
What a meltdown over on the "Ask Oma" forum today.
A couple of interesting things, though.
First, Hamou posted:
"Michelle/Russophile's IP and ability to post anything on my forum has been blocked."
Hmmm. So not only has Biernat's ability to post been blocked, but her ability to read what Hamou posts has been blocked.
That's pretty extreme. I wonder why Hamou would do that to her good friend and ardent supporter (even if Hamou still can't spell her name).
And then there was this interesting little tidbit, with Hamou posting:
"The FBI in Houston didn't believe you [Bob Atchison] and neither did others in law enforcement. They weren't impressed with your websites or with you."
Hmmm. Is this the same FBI with whom Hamou has filed criminal complaints against Bob for internet stalking? I wonder why they didn't take this matter up with Bob.
They are, after all, hot on his trail.
Aren't they?
Hamou, the judge explained it to you, you should have had an attorney.
I NEVER said any such thing in my response, either you didn't understand the response, you choose not to, or this is yet another smokescreen to cover your defiance of the court. My attorney explained it to you and the judge did as well.
I won completely on all of the counts I raised, all of them. You were completely and utterly defeated. Lie all you want - the court record is there for anyone who wants to see it. You lost.
Blake - excellent point I hadn't thought about that.
As long as we're satsifying vulgar curiousity, Oma, how was Refai able to get a judgment against you for 50K?
Mrs. Biernat does have the option of posting her retraction here, Blake, according to the email Pyles sent to her and her husband. Has anyone heard from him today?
RJ
RJ
Mike called me around lunch and told me he had already been today consulting with a well respected law firm about taking on the case
To my question about whether Hamou filed stalking charges against Atchison with the same FBI that was talking to Atchison earlier, she answered:
"No, it isn't."
I wonder if the FBI knows there's another FBI.
This is starting to feel like an episode of "Fringe".
It's the Fantasy Bureau of Investigation, Blake. It was formed specifically to deal with Oma Hamou's imagination.
Meanwhile, she is certainly ducking the Michele Biernat question, isn't she? I suppose she has confined it to Refai Land, the place where the judgment against her means nothing and was achieved through magic.
Has my BFF betrayed you, Oma? has she joined the long list of former associates who have distanced themselves from the ongoing train wreck that is your life?
RJ
And doesn't this make at least the second website from which Biernat has been banned?
Did Rob ban her from this one? I thought she had simply stopped posting here.
My goodness, Oma is just determined to forge on, isn't she? No response about why she banned Michele Biernat from posting on her "forum" (it's really more of a personal blog, isn't it?) and why she refuses to explain the unfortunate judgment against her obtained by Hamid Refai.
Perhaps she sent out a private email of explanation to all of her followers. Except she no longer has any. Blake is right. Where did Debbie go?
Rebecca
Court purposes, Oma? Is Mrs. Biernat suing you? Do tell!
Rebecca
Biernat was also banned from the Alexander Palace website.
Now Sandman has been dragged out to post cryptic links to the Huffington Post. Anything to avoid discussing what went wrong with the Biernats, eh, Oma? And once more: why did Hamid Refai succeed in getting his judgment?
Hamou posted:
"I am working hard within the American Justice system"
Well, you'd better work hard, because you're soon going to be banned from using it in Texas until you comply with the numerous court orders of the American Justice system you've flouted.
Still no word on why Hamou 'banned' Biernat.
The mystery deepens. Was Hamou using Russophile as a sock-puppert in her forum and posting as her? Did she get caught by the Biernats?
Did she ban them and their IP so they couldn't read anything she had posted as Russophile?
Seems Hamou's stalwart "friends" are dropping like flies..
Biernat: gone. Either banned by her "BFF" Hamou OR Biernat dropped Hamou like a hot potato once Joel found out what has been going on with "that woman" as he called her...
HugeFAT debbie: Gone, gone gone. Our sources reveal debbie saw what Hamou is really all about after her mother Sheri Porter got scammed out of THOUSAND of dollars(remember she fronted Hamou the cash for her trip to Austin, which Hamou PROMISED to repay her out of Porter's share of the Commission, on the deal HAMOU cancelled, thus screwing Shari out of ALL her commission...)
HugeFAT debbie's brother, Brad, isn't allowed to play with Nicholas the violent either...
Everyone moved out of Patricks' except Steve Lee....
Must be very lonely over in OmaHamouSockPuppet Theatre...
OMA,
thanks for confirming about Debbie! So it's true! great great great.
Also, you said "Rob Moshein, a crazy old man". Ummm Oma/Alexandra, you forgot that I'm only THREE years older than you.
Guess that makes YOU a "crazy OLD WOMAN" or at least a "crazy advanced middle aged woman" roflmao.
Hamou just posted:
"have been itching to tell me about they found out about Debbie"
Forgetting the extra "about" in the above phrase, it seems Hamou admits that Debbie has now departed the fold.
Since Hamou didn't even dare to take over "Handmaiden's" account to pretend Debbie was still around, it must have ended badly.
The rats continue to abandon the stinking ship.
Hamou posted:
"I have never taken over anyone's web account."
It'll be interesting to see whether the Biernats agree with that if they have to file an answer to a lawsuit.
By the way, how soon will we get to meet Anastasia Davis?
Funny Oma, you deliberately skipped over this:
Also, you said "Rob Moshein, a crazy old man". Ummm Oma/Alexandra, you forgot that I'm only THREE years older than you.
Guess that makes YOU a "crazy OLD WOMAN" or at least a "crazy advanced middle aged woman" roflmao.
Darlings! How exciting it all is! Remember that darling Lewis Stone in that darling Grand Hotel? "People come and people go and nothing ever happens in the Grand Hotel." Only of course things did! Darling John Barrymore shtupping darling Greta Garbo! And now darling Omele is telling us that everything is normal at darling Patrick's house! When it kind of obviously isn't, darling!
Mitzi Kedem
Hamou asked why all the interest in Anastasia Davis.
I don't know about others, but it's always nice to meet someone else with an interest in Russian history.
And in Austin, too.
Hamou posted:
"Why don't you ask Rob, since he has gone to her home, or so he said he did."
Well, of course I asked Rob first, as that would be the simplest thing to do, now wouldn't it?
But he tells me the Anastasia Davis in Austin had never heard of you or any history forum.
Sort of the same thing I hear happened when Sarskaia's telephone number was dialed, too.
You do have to admit, Hamou, it's awfully difficult to find people who back up your version of things. About the only people we can find who have encountered you in person invariably have a very different version from yours to relate.
Maybe Debbie could clear some things up. Should we call her?
Hi Oma. Email me debbie's phone number and I will be HAPPY to call her and verify her side of things. I'd LOVE to see her try to get a harassment order on me for doing that!
Please.
No Oma, the old lady who answered the door at the address listed for the website never heard of Anastasia Davis or you. THAT's what I said to Blake.
Now, why are you IGNORING the fact you called me a 'crazy old man" when I'm only three years older than you? WHAT DOES THAT MAKE YOU?
hmmmm?
Oma Alexandra McConnell Demian Moran Murphy Ashkenazy Hamou.
Actually, Rob never did tell me the name of the woman he talked to was "Anastasia Davis."
He checked the isp registration of the "Legend of Anastasia" forum to find the name and address that was registered as being the owner's -- and that name was "Anastasia Davis".
When he went to the Austin address on the site registration to talk with "Anastasia Davis", he found a woman of a different name who knew nothing about the website.
So the registration of the website was obviously fraudulent.
What a crusher.
Now I guess that means we never will get to meet the owner of that website so that he or she can verify the sources of the posts that were put on that site.
Which, of course, means the posts can never be admitted into evidence for any purpose.
Bummer.
Oma Rebecca Louise Jordan Taylor Chedid Abramou.
Oma, NOBODY is arguing with you that I did not go to "Anastasia Davis" residence!
I went to an address claimed to be her residence on the website registration and the old lady who answered said she never HEARD of her.
NOW, you go on and PROVE I did not got to THAT address. Go on. Prove it. You demand I prove all sorts of things, Your turn.
You are a CRAZY OLD WOMAN!
Actually Blake, you're not quite accurate:
Oma Louise McConnell Ashkenazy Hamou Alexandra McConnell Oma Chedid Rebecca Jordan Alexandra Moran
at least according to Court Records, Police alias records and Hamou's Credit report...
Oma, I said PROOF! Not stuff made up by anonymous people pretending on the internet. I know YOU like that as proof, but it isn't.
NOW, were you there? NO!
Was anyone following me? No!
Did you watch the house 24 hours? NO!
YOU HAVE NO PROOF I NEVER WENT TO THAT ADDRESS AND YOU KNOW IT!
That was the whole point. and what you posted PROVES my point. Not yours.
OMA HAMOU IS A CRAZY OLD WOMAN!
Post a Comment