As law enforcement seems unable to assist me, and the person behind this campaign to defame me and interfere with my business and profession, named variously Oma Hamou, Oma Mcconnell or Alexandra McConnell is what they call "judgment proof" meaning she has no money, I must place this blog here. She recently filed Bankruptcy, swearing under oath that her only income is $2500 a month from her friend Jim Sproul's company "Reseda Screen & Glass", that she lives in rental houses in the Antelope Valley and in July she was evicted for non payment of rent from a house in Palmdale, and she has over $500,000 in outstanding debts.
I would NOT even have written here, had this person not continually written her own false and defamatory statements herself and aided and abetted other personae writing "on her behalf" for the last three years. If she doesn't want me to say anything about her, she ought not have been continually blogging and writing about me much less aiding and encouraging others to do so as well.
The woman behind all of this goes by many names: Oma Hamou, Oma McConnell, Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Hamou, Oma Demian, Alexandra Murphy, are the usual ones, but there are others. The reason this woman and her "alleged" friends crusade to destroy me is simple. I learned about her genuine background, and she wants me silenced from speaking about it.
This woman admits that her actions are all motivated by her bitterness and hatred towards me, and this is the reason for her actions.
This woman, Oma Hamou, Oma McConnell, Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Hamou, Oma Demian, Alexandra Murphy and her other aliases have a twenty year track record of FELONY CONVICTIONS, multiple arrests, failure to abide by the requirements of her probation for her felony convictions which lead to more arrests, many many civil judgments against her for hundreds of thousands of dollars, a history of writing bad checks, and currently she was arrested late in 2008 in San Bernardino California on a Felony Charge of Forgery of a Financial Instrument (she seems to have forged a large check) After 14 months of dragging the process out, she paid the Victim full restitution and the District Attorney dropped the Felony charge. She has a history of evictions and bad checks.
This woman also has a recent default Judgment against her in Los Angeles County, in the amount of $55,000:
Case Number: MC020860 HAMID REFAI VS ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL, JIM SPROUL, ET AL
Filing Date: 09/23/2009
According to the case, Mr. Refai, a married man, was "involved" with Alexandra McConnell, she kept telling him about serious "medical problems" and asking for "loans" for medical bills in the total amount of $51,000. This was confirmed by the fact that a woman who used to live in her house wrote on the internet THREE MONTHS before the suit was filed: "I lived with this lady, she is no good. SHE LIES. SHE HAS LIKE 50 CATS LIVING WITH HER AND HER HOUSE SMELLS LIKE SHIT AND CAT SPRAY AND PISS. She is dirty, filthy and uses old men for money I SEEN IT MYSELF. By the way Hamid's wife knows it was LIPOSUCTION you drained their bank account for, not cancer in your asshole. He had her sign a promissory note, co signed by long time co-conspirator Jim Sproul. She of course never PAID back the money. She, of course, never showed up in Court.
Here is the Final Judgment against Alexandra McConnell aka Oma Hamou and her "longtime friend" Jim Sproul:
This woman has been EVICTED TWICE IN THE LAST TWO YEARS FOR FAILURE TO PAY RENT AND GIVING THE LANDLORD BACK CHECKS.
Someone else has recently posted a precis of the criminal and debt history of this woman. You can go here to read the specific details for yourself:
http://www.omahamoureality.blogspot.com
I have put up a precis of the specific information for her victims and law enforcement here: http://OmaHamouVictims.blogspot.com
You are encouraged to share information you may have about her and her activities with me.
While Oma Hamou aka Alexandra McConnell claims to be a "Motion Picture Executive" her online anonymous "friends" admit she works as a Paralegal in the Palmdale area. She has no background experience as a "Producer".
She is nearly psychotic in her daily compulsion because I stumbled onto these actual facts of her past, and present, which do not coincide with the personae she wants to project to others.
This woman, Oma Hamou, Oma McConnell, Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Hamou, Oma Demian, Alexandra Murphy et al, has for YEARS now, threatened me with civil and criminal actions. For years now, NOTHING has happened except more ongoing threats online. NOW HER OWN WEBSITE ON FEBRUARY 28, 2010 CONFIRMS AND ADMITS SHE AND HER "FRIENDS" DELIBERATELY LIED EVERY SINGLE TIME THEY SAID OMA HAMOU HAD FILED A CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST ME AND THEY WERE LYING EVERY SINGLE TIME THEY SAID I WAS UNDER POLICE INVESTIGATION, SINCE THE POLICE WILL INVESTIGATE NOTHING UNLESS A FORMAL COMPLAINT IS FILED. HER ONLINE ALLEGED 'FRIENDS' NOW CLAIM THEY HAVE LIED FOR YEARS ABOUT THEIR IDENTITIES.
I am called a "criminal stalker". First, being called a criminal is Libel per se in Texas, since I have never been convicted of ANYTHING worse than one speeding ticket. As for a stalker, well, I have no clue where this woman is, where she lives, and frankly I don't WANT to know, nor can I care less. In the words of one of her attorney's, Dave. S. "the faster that woman is in my rearview mirror the happier I'll be" (yeah I have the email he said that to me in.). I WISH NO CONTACT WITH OR FROM THIS PERSON.
I do NOT wish this person ill, or harm. Frankly, I do not care about her. The less I hear about her, the better. That said, no one should ever be subjected to harm or danger. I DO NOT WISH THIS PERSON HARM, nor have I advocated, wished, nor advised anyone to harm her. Such allegations are baseless, wrong and defamatory. I just want he to leave me and my partner ALONE and stop the thousands of pages of defamatory lies she puts up and allows "friends" to post on her website in order to cause me harm.
This woman, Oma Hamou, Oma McConnell, Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Hamou, Oma Demian, Alexandra Murphy has demonstrated she has no credibility. You can read in previous posts where she has outright lied, most notably when she filed a report about her business with Dunn and Bradstreet that was investigated by them and shown to be completely fraudulent.
Ask yourself if the following make any, rational or reasonable common sense:
This woman claims to be an actress and model, but for a decade steadfastly REFUSES to provide one single shred of evidence to support the allegation, not even a credit, reference or magazine issue. She says only "I was and I don't have to prove it. YOU have to prove I wasn't". Does that make sense?
This woman claims that her three felony convictions were not Her fault, but rather someone else's fault. Does THAT make sense?
This woman claims that her recent Felony Forgery Charges in San Bernardino are "just a big mistake" and "law enforcement and the DA" are on "her side" and "believe her", yet they STILL pressed charges and scheduling dozens of hearings over FOURTEEN MONTHS. Does THAT make sense??
This woman has claimed for six years non stop that I am being investigated by law enforcement and the FBI. Yet, NOTHING ever happened, I have never been contacted by law enforcement for any reason in those six years other than one speeding ticket. Does it make any sense to you that law enforcement is doing ANYTHING for six years now?
Buddha said Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense.
Look at all the blathering posts she has put up on the internet, and ask yourself, do these things agree with YOUR reason and your own common sense? The answer is obvious.
As you can see, this woman and/or her cronies now LIE, falsify documents and use years old private letters to attempt to defame and disparage me, and Bob Atchison
Many people whom have come into contact with her call her a con artist and scam artist. She hangs out with convicted felons, even inviting these career criminals to live in her house with her.
You can verify all the arrests, judgments, evictions, etc for yourself with simple online searches.
You are free to email me with your questions, Rob@AustinWineGuy.com, and if you yourself have been a VICTIM of this woman Oma Hamou, Oma McConnell, Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Hamou, Oma Demian, Alexandra Murphy, I encourage you to contact me.
265 comments:
1 – 200 of 265 Newer› Newest»Fresh clean new blog for the Holiday! Carry on.
I wonder how Curt Baggett reacted to that list of Hamou's aliases, the social security numbers she has used, the criminal convictions, the civil judgments (including two suits by her own lawyers), the evictions, and the felony arrest?
I have a feeling he might not be so willing to show up in court on her behalf, especially now that he knows her claim about that invoice was already litigated in Texas in 2005, where she lost.
And especially since he now knows he is going to be challenged in court to prove his supposed claim that Atchison committed the crime of defrauding the court.
Oh, yeah. Forgot to mention.
It's also the same list that Justin Edwards' attorney now has. And that other parties whom I am not yet free to name now have.
Where does she find these people? The words "fly-by-night" might have been invented to describe Mr. Baggett.
Also, Rob, I do think that you and Rob should allow your former attorney the opportunity to read the lies that Oma Hamou is posting about her on the internet. In fact, I am in favor of everyone being allowed to read the lies that she has posted about them.
I notice that we aren't hearing all that much about the imminent intrusion of the FBI on Oma's side. How is that going, dear? More to the point, how is the identity theft of Justin Edwards of the American Film Institute going? Have you paid Mr. Cowan or Mr. Refai what you owe them?
As if.
Sue Curt Baggett, Mr. Atchison. I should imagine Ms. Mathews will be interested in representing you again on this one.
The sheer effrontery of this crazy bitch is astonishing. The bulk of her life has been spent on the grift, and I suppose the rest of her life will be as well. At some point prison may well be the only answer.
Rebecca
Well, well. It seems that Atchison might get his debtor's exam of Hamou after all.
By using her mailbox address on the citation, that establishes that mailbox as the place at which she receives service of process.
So now all Atchison has to do is serve notice of the debtor's exam to that mailbox, and Hamou is deemed served under Texas law. It doesn't matter that she can't be physically located.
So, in order to proceed on any other cause of action, she will first have to comply with that demand for a debtor's exam relating to her delinquent judgment.
What is it that the kids say, Blake?
"Oh, snap!"
RJ
Well, since this is an all-new thread, I guess we have to explain all this nonsense about "faked" invoices all over again.
The original invoice to Hamou was on PallasArt letterhead. Hamou asked on several later occasions for another copy of the invoice. On one of those occasions, Atchison had no PallasArt letterhead on hand, so he printed the invoice on another letterhead instead of making a trip over to his partner's house to get a piece of PallasArt letterhead.
Hamou raised this issue at trial, trying to claim it made the alternate invoice illegitimate. Atchison explained this circumstance at trial. Neither the judge nor the jury felt it was of any probative value in the case, and the jury ruled in Atchison's favor based on the content of the invoice, not on the paper on which it was printed.
Hamou didn't need to go to any "document examiners" to prove there were different versions produced of the invoice. Atchison freely admitted as much at trial -- AND IT DID NOT MATTER TO THE JUDGE OR JURY.
Consequently, this issue is a question of fact which has already been litigated and resolved under Texas law. By failing to file an appeal, Hamou lost the right to raise this issue again.
THIS is what she is not telling these "document examiners" when she asks them whether the two invoices she shows them are different. Of course they are different. Everybody, including the judge and jury, has known that all along.
Where Baggett bagged himself was in going beyond a statement that the invoices were not matches to stating a conclusion of law that it constituted the crime of "fraud on the court."
It is that claim which he will have to prove in order to survive the lawsuit against him.
Good luck, bozo.
Above post emailed to Baggett.
Hamou will never actually show up in court.
My guess is Baggett, a Texas resident, does not have the luxury of being able to hide from process servers in a Texas cause of action.
Well, Oma, it's Baggett's problem now to sort out.
He will simply join the long ranks of people who have reason to regret ever having crossed your path.
We all know you will not show up in court, especially with a debtor's exam hanging over your head since you have now provided a means of serving you.
Calm down, "Snoopy"
How is it "THREATENING OMA" (posted in huge boldface on the "Ask Oma" forum) to state simple facts?
Process can now be served on Hamou for Texas causes of action. Atchison's judgment against her gives him the right to demand a debtor's exam.
No threats. Just straightforward statements about the state of things.
We are losing sight of something fundamental.
The "Bill of Review" (snicker) is STILL ON DWOP. Oma is acting like it is a live action and all, but Judge Dietz hasn't signed the dismissal YET, but he will.
WHY? AS A MATTER OF LAW:
1. A BILL OF REVIEW IS NOT AVAILABLE TO ANYONE WHO HAS NOT FILED A MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL OR FILED AN APPEAL IN A TIMELY FASHION.
OMA HAMOU FAILED TO DO EITHER OF THESE THINGS
Thus as a matter of LAW Judge Dietz MUST DISMISS THE CASE.
2. SERVICE OF PROCESS WAS NOT REQUESTED ISSUED OR RETURNED WITHIN TWELVE CALENDAR MONTHS AFTER FILING OF THE BILL OF REVIEW.
THE TEXAS SUPREME COURT MANDATES A TWELVE MONTH WINDOW FOR COMPLETION OF ALL CASES MUCH LESS ISSUANCE OF SERVICE
Therefore Judge Dietz MUST DISMISS THE CASE.
The following of legal procedures, such as filing and serving a Debtor's Exam is NOT A THREAT. It is a quite legal process and it will happen.
Dear Rob,
Surely you've noticed that legal action is only a "threat" when employed against Oma Hamou. She's been bloviating about doing it for the past five years, which makes her a terrorist on the order of Osama bin Laden. Mr. Baggett should be glad he faces a lawsuit. Then he will be able to demonstrate his charge of "fraud" against Bob Atchison. Bob Atchison can now institute a debtor's exam against you, Oma. So he must be happy. And you're happy because you're too stupid to realize that you have put your ass into a sling. And speaking of "fraud", girlfriend, I look forward to having the document you forged introduced into the court.
And I haven't even mentioned how happy Mr. Refai's lawyer and the Cowans are going to be. Lauren Mathews can launch a defamation of character suit against Baggett as well! See, Oma? You've spread Christmas cheer!
Now if you could only pay people like Dave Slater, the joy would reign unbridled!
Rebecca
Is my BFF taking the holidays off? Merry Christmas to you, Michele, and I hope you see your children during the Yuletide.
I have had some interesting conversations with a Jef Black, the director of the Portland branch of the American Cancer Society.
I sent him a list of Hamou's aliases, her criminal and civil court records, and some of her recent scrapes with the law.
I also provided him with the means to contact Refai's attorney concerning the $50,000 "loan" Hamou obtained from Refai by claiming to have cancer -- a loan on which Hamou defaulted after disappearing.
And, finally, I provided him with some of the posts Michele Biernat put up on the "Ask Oma" forum, vouching for Hamou's good character and arguing that she should be left in peace to conduct her "business" as she sees fit.
It's not my place to repeat here what Mr. Black's reaction was to having a woman who sits on two Portland American Cancer Society committees be an advocate of a woman who runs cancer scams for money. Suffice it to say he is preparing for a meeting on the topic with some senior executives.
He also felt strongly that the Los Angeles branch of the Cancer Society should be informed that a woman is running cancer scams in their district.
Oh! Oh, my goodness gracious. Things are really heating up here, my dears.
I must admit that sweet Blake's post about the American Cancer Society caused me to catch my breath a bit.
But, then, I fanned myself a bit and began to reflect on how Russophile, earnest dear that she is, had posted on the "Ask Oma" forum that she was telling her acquaintances on history forums not to buy a new book by Penny Wilson, apparently in frustration because that spicy and always outspoken Ms. Wilson had formed a newer and less sympathetic view of Oma Hamou once she knew more of her activities.
So I guess it's just sort of a sauce-for-the-goose-sauce-for-the-gander sort of thing.
I suppose fewer people might buy Ms. Wilson's new book, as Mrs. Biernat hopes. And I suspect a few eyebrows might now go up when Mrs. Biernat walks into a committee meeting.
Oh, and before I forget, pets --
Merry Christmas!
Merry Christmas to you, Penny, and I hope you have a happy New Year as well.
Oma, you have missed at least part of the point of my post, girlfriend. I would think that Mr. Baggett is the one who should be worried. You're too stupid, but surely a native cunning will enable him to see that he has walked right into the shitstorm that is your life, Oma. He is quoted as saying that Bob Atchison committed fraud, and you claim that his attorney at the time colluded with him in this endeavor. Mr. Baggett is now open for a lawsuit. Two, actually. But of course you will be there, right by his side, the way you claim that "Justin Edwards of the American Film Institute" will be by yours when it all ends up in court.
And my BFF, of course.
Amazing. All of these people will take a bullet for you, and none of them will lend you ten bucks to keep the wolf from your door.
I assume you are sending all of this to Refai's attorney and the Cowans, Blake? Or to anyone else who will have a vested interest in the debtor's exam?
How can you tell Oma Hamou is lying? Oh, right, she starts typing. Mr. Black told you no such thing, Oma, and you know it. I sit on several boards, dear, and none of them could ignore the kind of evidence that Blake sent along. And people in Los Angeles should be warned that there is a con woman trading upon a faked cancer diagnosis in order to scam money. Either that or you should be the poster child for the Crystal Cathedral, because you have been cured of so many cancers and other illnesses.
You are such a liar.
Rebecca
Nice choice of analogy RJ. The Crystal Cathedral is in BANKRUPTCY!
ROFL
Ah, Oma, Oma, Oma.
No, the American Cancer Society does not appreciate being drawn into this. But what, specifically, they do not appreciate is the risk to which they are exposed by having a woman who works with their organization and who gives press interviews for cancer support become associated with a con artist who runs cancer scams.
Their concern is that someone might google Michele Biernat's name in relation to Cancer Society work and find that she has been posting on a con artist's website in support of a woman who has been involved in scamming a man by claiming cancer.
They have been given the necessary details to check your criminal and civil histories on their own; they have been given the means to verify the details of the Refai scam on their own; and they have seen the Biernat posts vouching for your good character.
What they conclude from it all is, of course, up to them.
I'm betting this does not come down in your favor. In fact, I have reason to be certain.
FYI Oma. Just called the Courthouse. The case status is STILL ON DWOP CALENDAR.
Prove otherwise.
Dear Oma,
My contact with Markell was limited to one handwritten note left at my hotel in St. Petersburg a couple of months ago, the text of which I put up a week or so ago. You rejected it, as is your right. You seem to be laboring under the delusion that I am Bob Atchison, who has posted that he only does so under his own name.
I am not Bob Atchison. I am exactly who I say I am, dear, and the only reason that I am putting this post up is because this forum is now being read by all sorts of interesting people. This is largely due to the diligence of people like Blake Springpasture, the Kedem family, your poor former confederate in Hawaii, Penelope, Rob and upon occasion, Bob.
And that's what Christmas is all about, Charlie Brown.
Rebecca
Seems Hamou is not having the best of days.
The Woman Who Sued Herself has, apparently, now unwittingly opened herself to a debtor's exam.
I know she doesn't have much of a track record with lawyers, who sometimes turn on her and take the truly remarkable step of suing their own client.
But she really, really needs to get serious legal help here instead of turning to some local yokel service that files documents with the wrong court and fails to warn her that she is providing a legal process service address.
They might also have warned her that posting on the internet "evidence" from a "document expert" supposedly to be used at trial ahead of the trial is stupid beyond belief. (And I doubt Baggett is too happy about it.)
Doesn't Advanced Paralegal Services have a local branch? I hear their work is absolutely top drawer. (snicker)
Darling Blakele,
Such a busy little pisher you've been, darling! And darling Omele, Rivka should buy a dog and bark for herself? Why should she post anything you want to see, darling? Only idiots post things on the internet, and even bigger idiots post forgeries, which I guess you would know something about, darling, since you forged that court thing with the fake notary seal. Darling, you grift the way normal people breathe, don't you?
Rebecca, what's the deal with Rudi? Is your darling Leighton going to ski with him? Because, darling, remember the old joke? "How far is it from Berlin to Paris?" "A three day march."
Mitzi
Astounding. She is still (1) pretending to be Justin Edwards of the American Film Institute (2) claiming that statements that can be proven by posts from her own forum are lies (I'm sorry, BFF, but you have said on numerous times that you accept Ms. Hamou's version of things, surely not a good idea if you are a representative of the Cancer Society) (3) referring to Atchison's attorney as a crook and (4) carrying on about a case that she lost, fair and square, years ago. Of course that is what truly sticks in her craw, that she tried all of her nonsense in a genuine court of law as opposed to parading the crap on the internet, and the nice judge found her to be guilty as sin.
Oma Hamou, grifter, con artist, liar and thief. Did I miss anything? Oh, yes. Harmer of animals. Those poor cats.
Rebecca
Sorry, Mitz, I missed your post. Leighton is indeed going to ski with Rudi, but not in Germany or Austria. In Switzerland. And he is truly a nice young man! I can't help it if he looks like a poster child for the
Hitlerjugend!
RJ
Regarding the supposed "faked" invoice used in court, "Snoopy" posted:
"The Pallasart document contains the same verbiage on the Bob Atchison document as far the alleged consulting services provided but that is as far as it goes."
Dolt. That is as far as it needed to go.
The court could not care less about the format of the invoice once Atchison explained why the formats differed. The legal issue was whether you, as the defendant, were on notice of the amount Atchison, the plaintiff, claimed you owed him on a contract.
By your -- uh, "Snoopy's" -- own admission you were given consistent notice of the claim Atchison was making.
The jury determined you knew the amount demanded of you. They concluded you had contracted for those terms. They concluded you had failed to honor that contract. They concluded you had no legal defense for failing to honor that contract. They ruled against you.
And it seems to have driven you to a whole new depth of insanity ever since.
Cripes, Hamou. You really should get a lawyer to help you with all this.
"Snoopy" just admitted in a post on the "Ask Oma" forum that the substance of both versions of the invoice given to Hamou was the same.
Yet Hamou induced that "expert" Baggett to say not only that the two invoices were not identical (duh), but that Atchison committed a fraud on the court.
Baggett can't be too happy that you are unwittingly posting proof that there was no fraud.
You are the perfect illustration of the nostrum that a person who represents himself has a fool for a client.
Oh, this is just too rich. "Snoopy" (who is Oma) posted:
"Does anyone know if the court served Bob Atchison with the legal pleadings about Oma's case against him or did he did he run and hide as has done in the past when Attorney Dave Slater tried to have him serve???"
Name one time when Bob Atchison has failed to appear once he has been properly served. I dare you. Name one single time. (Of course, you're at a disadvantage here because, unlike you, Atchison has been in court on only two cases -- both of which he won.)
You, on the other hand, are a chronic no-show (and a chronic loser in court, whether you show or not).
That's why there's an outstanding bench warrant for your arrest in Los Angeles County. (It's also probably why that fat woman hauls you around in the black SUV. If you got pulled on a traffic stop, the officer would run your name through the system and haul you off to jail on the spot.)
That's also why Hamid Refai has a judgment against you by default when you failed to appear at that trial after being properly served.
And that's also why Eric Cowan got a default UD for your eviction when you ceased showing for the proceedings after you got caught trying to foist off an altered document on the judge.
And that's also why you have more than a dozen default judgments against you from a host of lawsuits going back years.
In fact, the only time you appeared all times required in at least the past three years was when you were arrested in San Bernardino for felony forgery and held for two weeks under $1 million bond.
Now, as for service of process in your Bill of Review. Bob has no reason to duck it, as that service will lock in your Pak-Mail box as the legal place for serving you. And trust me, Bob is chomping at the bit to put you under that debtor's exam for the judgment he holds against you.
He's also looking forward to having Curt Baggett sashay into court as an "expert" who will prove his allegation that Bob committed "fraud on the court".
(Unfortunately for Baggett, Oma, by your revealing that he made the claim that Bob Atchison committed fraud outside of attorney-client privilege and by your posting his claim on the internet outside of the libel protection a courtroom would have given the utterance, you have left him wide open. You really are an ignoramus, Oma. And you really need some legal advice if you're going to keep firing off like a loose cannon. I suspect Baggett would appreciate it.)
Nobody has rung the doorbell, save for UPS and the gardner. No process servers have appeared so far.
Oma is one to talk about "avoiding service of process"...
Refai's lawyer has been trying. Eric Cowan has been trying. Reed Elsevier tried and tried.
Oh, and Oma, I'm not going to give you any more free legal advice (which you have been following) but I will say only this:
The ONLY way to avoid Bob's Debtor's exam is a specific legal procedure (which I will not reveal to you so find it for yourself) which will REQUIRE you to post a Bond for the full amount of the Judgment which you owe, which with interest at the legal rate is now some $23,000. Bob will, I'm afraid rather INSIST that the Court order this bond.
It is indeed a Merry Christmas.
Well, Rob, it seems you forgot to warn her about posting on the internet what should have been privileged communications between her "document expert" and her attorney.
I guess that crack legal squad at Advanced Paralegal Services aren't really much good in a crunch, huh?
Although, judging by "Debbie", they're pretty good at a munch.
Oma Hamou should have a red target painted across her espadrilles, although it would be gilding the lily. She manages to shoot herself in the foot with enough regularity that she qualifies as a marksman; she never misses.
RJ
Hmmm, I wonder what the Portland Cancer Society Folks will think about Michele Biernat of Benefit Design Group calling gay people "Rump Ranger"?
Is THAT the sort of person that they would want as a representative? Really??
Oh, and Biernat, the bigot,
I knew about that silly little site forever ago. It was put up by another disgruntled person I tossed out of the Forum because they refused to stop personal attacks and name calling of other users on the Forum. They got their nose out of joint and decided to try to trash me online.
Sound familiar?? It should.
Hoo, boy. People might have a field day if they search the blogosphere on Curt Baggett, Oma Hamou's world-renowned expert document examiner (as seen on TV).
When I first looked at his website and saw that he does for $295 what he says other professional expert document examiners charge $1,200 to do, I had to wonder what kinds of cost controls he has to allow him to do such cut-rate expert work (as seen on TV).
I guess we now have part of the answer. He doesn't bother with legal niceties such as keeping his professional communications with potential litigants within attorney-client privilege. One would hope that customers looking to save that $905 (as seen on TV) would consider whether this little shortcut is in their best interests.
But I did like his "quick opinion" feature (as seen on TV). I guess if you're going to skip the legal niceties, you can get the credit card number all the faster from customers.
I wonder, though, if he knows that Oma Hamou is also an as-seen-on-TV personality?
I wonder if expert document examiners get a chance to catch late-night male enhancement pill ads on cable?
Oh, Biernat. It wasn't yarns that got spun with Mr. Black.
It was cites to court cases; the number of an attorney who can give him the particulars on how Hamou claimed to have cancer in order to scam $50,000 out of Hamid Refai; Hamou's letter to the Russian Church official years ago, claiming to have cancer back then -- you know, such nettlesome little independently-verifiable details as that.
And he also got copies of your actual posts lauding Ms. Hamou's virtues. No paraphrasing from moi.
I also told him of your apparent motives in getting involved in defending Hamou, despite her criminal history and on-going cons. I was a bit surprised to find out that he already knew of the Alexander Palace website and seemed to enjoy it.
Who woulda thunk? Maybe you and he can compare notes.
Yes ..... I do wonder what he will think of the "rump ranger" comment.
Perhaps I should also point him to your post about all those stupid black people who dropped their employer health plans the instant Obama was elected.
Oh, BFF.
Tsarevich13 is your "overseas friend" who has bad things to say about the Alexander Palace and the FA, who I assume is Rob or Bob?
BFF, I think he is a thirteen year old boy, and the people who posted to him are about the same age, if not the same sex. I noticed the few times I went to the Alexander Palace forum that there are a lot of early adolescents on it, and that they squabble about the way you would expect that age group to do. I have no idea what the kid did to tee Rob or Bob off, but his "arguments" against them are barely above the level of "they're stupid do-do heads".
Come on, you can do better than that. Or perhaps you can't, I don't know. But Tsarevich13 is clearly unhappy because he got sent to a time-out. And of course so were you, BFF, but do you really want to ally with the mean girls on the recess yard?
Glad to hear that your son made it home for the holiday and that you are enjoying his company. I am going to Connecticut for mine.
I was intrigued by the names of the people who posted on his blog. "Alix of Hesse"? "OTMAA", which is an acronym for the royal children's names? I think I am going to call myself the Grand Duchess Rebecca from now on.
Or not.
Rebecca
I almost forgot. It goes without saying that it would take a 13 year old to believe anything that Oma Hamou says. Or a woman in her forties, apparently. Ease up on the eggnog, BFF.
Oma, you keep missing the point! (You may want to lay off the eggnog as well.) It doesn't matter if you disagreed about the identity of whom you owed the money to after the judgment. The point is that you were notified that it was Bob Atchison.
Blake is right, girlfriend. Spend a few rubles and get a lawyer.
RJ
But BFF, the wheels of justice did do their thing. Actually, they have done their thing for Cowan, Refai and Atchison. Why doesn't she just pay up? It is just as fair a question.
I should add, BFF, that in the interest of even-handed impartiality, I hope you are advising Oma Hamou to submit to a debtor's exam?
Your BFF
Are you cooking for Christmas?
Michele Biernat posted:
"You know what gets me, if that if Moshein and Atchison have nothing to hide, then just get served and go to court and justice will be served."
What gets me is how dense you can be.
Hamou is not going to show up in a courtroom. Why do you think she did not appeal? Why do you think she did not file a complete Bill of Review pleading on time? Why do you think she did not apply for certification on time? Why do you think she did not seek to get process served on time?
She wants to have this battle on the internet, where she can fabricate evidence to suit her purposes. The last place she will ever have it voluntarily is in a courtroom, where she has to abide by real rules of evidence.
And there is, of course, also the little problem of the debtor's exam and the other judgments against her that will be localized to the Texas court should this case mature into a real action.
It's driving her crazy that we keep calling her bluffs and forcing her to take step after step that she really doesn't want to take. The best she can do is be sure she takes them too late to trigger a real court hearing: miss filing deadlines, submit incomplete pleadings, have things dropped off at the wrong court.
But it's been worth it at our end. Just consider that Curt Baggett is now hitting these blogs after searching on Oma Hamou's name. As are some others I can't mention just yet. It's a real Christmas party, as it were.
Oma Oma Oma, you REALLY need to talk to a REAL lawyer, not the one in your head...
You wrote:
"The trial transcript bear out the fact Oma told the court if she owed anyone it was Pallasart and the Settlement invoice proved it but Bob and his attorney said the Settlement invoice was for something all together different and Bob went on and lied and said he was not involved with any settlement between his company and Enigma with the other lawsuit, a lawsuit hi attorney claimed was filed prior to his there in Texas. Both the attorney and Bob lied and you keep lying about the facts when one you weren't even present and two the trial transcripts proves your lying just to harass, stalk, torment my friend Oma Hamou. Something she alleges in her Bill of Review...."
BILL OF REVIEW IS ONLY AVAILABLE FOR MATTERS EXTRINSIC TO THE ORIGINAL TRIAL "EXTRINSIC" MEANS IN SO MANY WORDS NOT BROUGHT OUT AT THE ORIGINAL TRIAL
By your own statement, these issues were brought up IN THE ORIGINAL TRIAL, thus the LAW PRECLUDES THEM FROM BEING PART OF A BILL OF REVIEW!!
Thanks!
"Snoopy" posted:
"Again you really thought if you told him [Curt Baggett] your lies about Oma he would side with you."
No. It's pretty clear that Baggett is the kind of "expert" (as seen on TV) who only sides with the people who send him money.
I just thought it was only fair to let him know what he's gotten himself into by dealing with you.
Justin Edwards' father had to get an attorney to counsel him on how to deal with your theft of Edwards' identity.
Hamid Refai had to get an attorney and go to the police after meeting you.
Eric Cowan had to go to the police after meeting you.
Huiku Batchelor had to go to the police after meeting you.
Wild West Productions had to go to the police after meeting you.
Don Morton's family had to get an attorney and go to the police after he met you.
Bob Atchison had to get an attorney after meeting you.
People whose names you used to get American Express credit cards had to get attorneys after meeting you.
Reed Elsevier, Global Insight ....... the list goes on and on.
The American Bar Association and the Fraternal Order of Police ought to give you awards. You have created more business for their members than a Mexican drug ring.
Well, well ............
After putting up the above post, I checked my email and found this message from Curt Baggett:
"Blake,
Thanks. I cannot help it if people try to use or attack me. I am only trying really hard to make a living as ethical and truthful as I can. I am sorry for your troubles and Oma's.
Curt"
Maybe he really is just another poor bloke whose life was made more difficult by having been used by Oma Hamou for her own ends.
Oma, I think my BFF is more than capable of speaking for herself. You should be flattered, girlfriend, as she obviously puts a higher value upon your friendship than she does her relationship with the Cancer Society in Portland.
Oh, and "AnonymousOne", I will be happy to post a link to Tsarevich13's website, if you actually think that anyone would be interested in the teenager's thoughts.
And Mr. Baggett, congratulations upon a wise decision. I would back away slowly from this. I would also make sure that her check cleared, or that she paid you with a functioning credit card.
Rebecca
Hmmmm.
I wonder if Tsarevich13 could give Hamou an expert opinion on her documents at a good price, now that there appears to be an opening on the witness stand.
But what really kills me here is that Biernat and Hamou have turned to a group of early teens who post on the internet about princesses' fingernail polish and hairdos for support.
It would be hard for this to get any funnier.
I went back through my records and discovered that the kid who hates me so much was indeed the 13 year old boy who insisted that he was in fact the reincarnation of Tsetsarevich Alexei Nicholaievich and the he wanted unfettered permission to discuss this as absolute fact in the AP Forum.
I told him that unless he had scientific evidence to prove reincarnation existed, his comments were to be restricted to the "Having Fun" section of the Forum and not in the "serious history" threads.
He didn't like it, and when I started deleting his reincarnation posts in the "serious" threads, he went ballistic and called me disrespectful names. I gave him a 30 day time out suspension, which was removed after the 30 days. He did not choose to return, rather he started the "we hate AP Forum" website..
SO if Michele Biernat the bigot is to be believed, the only people who "also" think I'm so horrible and who "believe" Oma Hamou is a THIRTEEN YEAR OLD BOY who also BELIEVES HE IS THE REINCARNATION OF GRAND DUKE TSETSAREVICH ALEXEI.
Biernat really has a great group of friends, Criminals, Homophobic bigots and delusional 13 year olds...
Hey, what can you say?
When Oma Hamou is the bar Russophile sets for credibility, then a 13-year old reincarnationist would hardly draw a sidelong glance.
Boys, I don't think that my BFF is what you would call a "careful reader". Which, come to think of it, explains a lot.
Thanks for looking through your records, Rob. The truth is even weirder than I could have imagined. But doesn't Oma think she is a reincarnation of the Czarina? Maybe they all knew each other in a previous life.
RJ
Also, my bet is that Mr. Baggett will no longer take her calls. Anyone want to pony up?
Sorry Oma. Your last post was wrong on all counts.
Bob does not "talk" to the dead. He does consider Alexandra Feodorovna to be one of his patron saints in the Russian Orthodox Church. As do tens of thousands of other Pravoslavnie around the world.
Second. I did not say that horrid photo of Oma Hamou looked like a "Hollywood Drag Queen".
She looks like a "West Hollywood Drag Queen". I still believe that to this day. Don't know really WHY you bring this up all the time, over and over and over, unless it REALLY bothers you. Which, clearly, it does.
Of course that pic is almost a decade old now. So NOW you would look like AN OLD WEST HOLLYWOOD DRAG QUEEN in that get up.
Feel Better now?
"Snoopy" posted:
"this picture shows her [Hamou] as being a beautiful Russian woman"
Okay. I stand corrected.
Today could get funnier.
And underneath the photograph of her as a Hollywood drag queen, it reads "it isn't libel or defamation if it's true."
I assume from her post that Mr. Baggett is no longer taking her calls.
Any process servers coming up the path, Rob?
You know, every now and then among the everyday lunacy that is Oma Hamou's existence we get a bright flash of light into the real depths of her insanity.
Today is an example. Amidst posts about the mess she's has made of her Bill of Review attempt, her long history of fraud and lawsuits, the implosion of her "expert document" witness .....
What do we get?
A post of that silly picture, with her essentially whimpering, "see -- I am pretty. I AM."
It's very funny, yes. But it's also a bit creepy.
Nope. Nada. Only time the bell rang today is when UPS delivered a box of some Blue Ray discs from Amazon.
No process servers, no FBI agents, no Austin Police Swat Teams...
Quiet.
Oh, Good Lord.
"Snoopy" just addressed a post to Rob about process service, asking if he was going to jump into his SUV.
Oma, can you really not get any of this right?
It's not Rob you're trying to serve. It's Bob. B ... O ... B
I doubt if Rob plans to accept anything.
I swear. The Woman Who Sued Herself really is hopeless. Utterly, irredeemably hopeless.
Oma, dear, what are you talking about? It has been Blake who has been in communication with Mr. Baggett. It was Blake who received the email he posted above. And you are lying, girlfriend, unless you are prepared to say that Mr. Baggett did send the email. Which he did.
So there goes one of the three "experts" who was prepared to go into court with you, doll.
And now my BFF has gone quiet. But I am sure she is willing to watch your back, Oma.
And still no service? Why . . .why . . . Oma said they were on their way, Rob!
And I know you want it, so you can file for a debtor's examination.
I'm sorry, but I am laughing uncontrollably. Richard just poked his head into my office, I told him what was going on, and he crashed into a chorus of "Happy holidays!"
RJ
Oma REALLY gets nothing right. Not only is nobody ringing the bell, but I don't have an SUV to "hop into". I drive a late model Lexus actually. Bob doesn't have an SUV either. We haven't had an "SUV" for six YEARS now.
and who said Bob was even home?? I didn't. I am. I'm waiting for the guy to come fix the dishwasher that's on the fritz.
Uh, "Snoopy". Recheck your post. The comment about jumping into an SUV was directly under a quote you posted that was addressed to Rob. R ... O ... B.
And here's a new goody:
"I seen the numerous cease and desist letters sent back by Oma"
"I seen?" Sorry, dear. Your hillbilly is showing.
And what cease and desist letters did Oma send back?
She "seen" it.
Honest to God, are there no standards left in American education? Did you graduate from high school, Oma? You are constitutionally unable to use the contraction "you're" correctly, and now you are posting "I seen it". And before you start screeching, I do know the difference between a typo and rank ignorance, which is what fuels your engine, girlfriend.
Now, back to our story, already in progress. Will anyone come up the garden path to serve Bob, unless she somehow made another mistake and is somehow going to try and serve Rob? (No) Will Curt Baggett testify that Bob Atchison committed fraud in a courtroom on Oma's behalf? (No) Will Michele Biernat, my BFF, sterling mother of three, generous volunteer with the Cancer Society, regret her involvement with Oma Hamou, Rob Moshein and Bob Atchison? (50-50) Will Oma Hamou ever stop trying to con people on the internet or in real life? (No, no, a thousand times no!)
Let the merry bells keep ringin', happy holidays to you!
Rebecca Jordan
More things Oma doesn't get right:
Im NOT Blake. BLAKE is Blake.
Bob is NOT Blake. Bob is BOB.
Rebecca isn't Bob. Rebecca is Rebecca
I'm ME
Bob is Bob
RJ is RJ
Blake is Blake.
I know that's hard for you to swallow Oma. But, Bob and I are very much NOT the only people who post here.
Bob almost never posts here. He finds Oma Hamou beneath contempt (well, except for the time the Court HELD HER IN CONTEMPT)...
I figured out the confusion.
Oma Hamou ASSUMES that others use fake names, JUST LIKE SHE DOES.
She can't wrap her graying badly dyed little head around the FACT that RJ, Blake and I KNOW we are all different people.
She believes that just because SHE talks to herself in different characters that others must as well...
That explains it.
Her experience is vastly different than yours and Bob's, Rob. According to everything I have read, Oma Hamou has spent the bulk of her life in the company of either grifters, criminals or liars (categories into which she falls, of course). Given those circumstances, you can't really blame her for an inability to comprehend how much her behavior could offend people.
I know this is hard for you to understand, Oma, but some people really do take umbrage at the idea that you are out there claiming to have cancer to get money out of people, that you are out there targeting old men for credit card scams, that you stiff landlord after landlord, causing genuine distress and damage, and that you have conducted a silly internet flame war with the intent to harm people. At this point virtually all of your actions have backfired rather spectacularly, doll, but in your egotism that doesn't matter. The only thing that matters is that someone, anyone, believes your ridiculous version of the events. Well, someone does. Her name is Michele Biernat. Isn't that enough?
RJ
I let my people go at three. Call me Rebecca "Ghost of Christmas Present" Jordan. At some point I am going to have to go home and wrap gifts, but this is too much fun.
Oma, sweetie, I am not going to tell you the name of my bank because I don't like you, and I don't want to have to deal with you. I swear by the perjury laws governing the state of New York that I have not called or emailed Mr. Baggett. I did speak to a number of agents with the FBI in New York and Los Angeles. I did speak with several people at Pushkin when I was in Russia. I did pull a string or two at the State Department to satisfy my curiosity when you claimed to have adopted the Russian child (which of course you did not). None of these things impinged upon you at all, Ms. Hamou, because at no time did I have to sell people on the idea that you were a con artist. They already knew.
And now Mr. Baggett knows. I certainly hope he was paid. He can use the money to pay the lawyer who will undoubtedly advise him that calling Bob Atchison's actions a "fraud" in a case that Atchison actually won was such a smart idea.
Deck the halls with boughs of Oma, fa la la la la, la la la la.
"Snoopy" posted:
"Here is my post idiot."
Did you mean, "here is my post, idiot" or "here is my idiot post"?
Punctuation seems to present the same challenges to you as do spelling and grammar.
And, "Snoopy", it's a bit late to add the attribution to Rebecca.
The way you used a quote to structure the post, both physically and grammatically, about the SUV indicated that you were responding to a question addressed to Rob -- R ... O ... B, not to Bob -- B ... O ... B. It doesn't matter whether you or Rebecca asked the question originally.
Honestly, "Snoopy". Sometimes trying to carry on a clear interchange with you can be like trying to use sign language with a fish.
Blake,
Just give it up. Oma Hamou will never understand the REALITY that you and RJ are VERY REAL PEOPLE who are NOT me nor are they Bob.
Her self absorbed Psychopathic brain just can't process that bit of truth.
She is incapable of accepting it.
There is an old Texas saying, which is in this case, Salient on many many levels
"Don't try to teach a pig to sing. It will only frustrate you and annoy the pig."
Oma of course, is the pig, who can't sing...or accept reality.
"Snoopy" posted:
"you think legitimate attorneys and others agree with you just because you say all these things about Oma, not a chance. Those phone numbers have been provided by attorneys, debt collection agencies, lots of recent calls you made which came according to you from a computer but that too is being traced"
Someone called debt collection agencies? Uh-oh. Somebody else outside this blog must be on Oma's trail. Now there's a surprise.
As for "legitimate" attorneys agreeing with me -- I do not know whether or not they are in accord with my view that you are an immoral skank for running cancer scams and ripping off old men with dementia.
I do know they know how to track down cases once they are given cites. I do know they know what arrests, probation, default judgments, unsatisfied judgments, unlawful detainers, and outstanding warrants signify. I do know they know how to read private investigators' reports.
I do know they recognize a con artist when they see the clear trail of one.
Maybe they admire you for your devil-may-care attitude when it comes to harming other people to get what you want, where I do not. But no one has yet taken issue with the view that the pattern of the court records you leave behind indicates you are a con artist.
Ah, Biernat. Good to hear from our erstwhile cancer victims advocate.
Maybe you could start a committee in Portland on how to make a buck or two off the disease.
Give Thomas Ward a call. He'll walk you through it.
Harsh, but true, Rob.
So what are you guys doing for Christmas? Staying in Austin waiting for the process server to come down the chimney?
Thanks for the rec's on the gift wines. My assistant was thrilled with her case, and I gave out bottles to my doorman, etc.
Rebecca
I was on the phone, didn't see Blake's last two posts before I answered Rob's.
Oh, BFF. You're (take notes, Oma) lashing yourself to the mast of the good ship Crazy. That's kind of sweet. And, well, idiotic, but suit yourself.
Who is Thomas Ward? I sometimes think this mess needs a playbook.
RJ
Thomas Ward is Hamid Refai's attorney. the one who will confirm that Oma Hamou using the alias name Alexandra McConnell "borrowed" some $50,000 from him for her "cancer" treatments, signed a promissory note, which has has refused to repay.
So, the doorbell RANG! around 6:30. It was a group of Christmas Carolers! Now, am not really into Christmas much, being Jewish and all, but they were WONDERFUL! Simply beautiful singing.
Sorry to disappoint you Oma. I guess the "process server" who is "on their way as we speak" is waiting for the FBI so they can all swoop in at once.
They will be disappointed I'm sorry to say.
This email was sent to Curt Baggett, Hamou's "expert document examiner" a few minutes ago:
Thank you for your response.
I posted your response, and Oma Hamou ("Snoopy") posted back that this email is authentic and that you are still going to testify against Bob Atchison. I take that to mean that she has talked to you since your response and that you remain resolved to stand by the claim that Bob Atchison committed the crime of fraud.
We know the documents you examined are not a match to each other. Atchison has never argued otherwise, in court where the issue was first raised, or elsewhere. However, they both reflect the same underlying claim on which a jury found against Hamou, in full knowledge that Hamou argued the introduction of the variant invoice was improper. But you have taken an extraordinary leap in going from opining on the comparability of the documents to state further the conclusion of law that Atchison committed fraud.
If you understand the law in Texas, you know that you made this communication outside the scope of privileged communications and that the accusation is libel per se if you cannot prove it.
Therefore I will stand by my offer to Bob Atchison to provide any assistance he needs in filing a lawsuit against you. I am perplexed that you would put your services at the disposal of a career con artist with her long criminal and civil history now that you are aware of it, but I will be interested in seeing how you go about proving that Atchison committed fraud.
And, of course, as you have made yourself part of this controversy and your client Hamou chose to introduce your involvement to our internet audience, your name will continue to figure prominently in our internet efforts to keep Hamou's conduct visible to her recent and future victims.
Thank you for your attention. Good luck in court.
_____________________
(By the way, I'm also going to send this to Justin Edwards' attorney so that he can see what Hamou is now doing using Justin Edwards' identity.)
Oma, Oma, Oma. Try to calm your rattled nerves.
No process has been served. No trial has been scheduled. No witness list has been produced. So there are no "witnesses" at all, much less any to threaten.
Baggett got pulled into this by you, when you posted his name on the internet along with the claim that he was going to testify to prove that Bob Atchison "committed fraud on the court". Now, if that's not a threat, please explain what is.
Baggett seems able to correspond with me on his own behalf. He has not said he feels threatened. In fact, he might appreciate not being blind-sided with what's coming.
If anything, he seems to regret having ever heard of you.
Ah, now there's a long list.
Why do I get the feeling from Hamou's obvious panic that Baggett has not actually told her he still intends to testify to fraud?
Oh, well. I'll just wait to see if and how Baggett responds to my email.
Oma, you've really got to calm down and write coherently.
You addressed this post to me:
"Again, the trial transcripts prove you lied to Bob Atchison concerning the document he gave to the coruts [sic]"
Where did I figure anywhere in the trial transcripts?
And what lie have I told to Bob Atchison?
I'm going to bed and let you finish getting drunk, Hamou.
You cannot even string words into a coherent sentence at this point, much less convey a coherent thought.
New landlord troubles?
Sheesh.
Darlings!
Such a busy day you've all had, darlings! And I think the busiest of all has been Oma "I Breathe, Therefore I Grift" Hamou, still pretending to be Justin Edwards, still pretending that she is going to come to court, still pretending so many things, darlings.
Well, darling Blakele, sleep well. You've earned it. And darling Omele, do yourself a favour and lay off the sauce, darling, it's making you even crazier than usual. And that's what I call crazy!
Mitzi
Well Oma Hamou the criminal strikes again. Imageshack has been sent a removal demand letter for the photograph of me that Oma Hamou keeps STEALING.
You see, that photo of me at Ch. Fleur La Mothe isn't even MY property. It is the copyrighted property of the Bordeaux Wine Council, and they aren't pleased with Oma downloading it illegally, yet again.
Now, I have been granted a license by the CIVB to use the photo myself. But, Oma Hamou has no legal right to use the image for any purpose.
Does Oma Hamou CARE? Nope. Utter disregard for the law as usual. She is so psychopathic that the laws are for others, but not for her.
PS, still no process servers.
OH, and RJ, I didn't notice your question from yesterday.
Quiet Christmas here. Bob is with his immediate family, I'm staying home, playing with the breadmaker Bob bought me for christmas, drinking good wines, and tending to the critters.
No Oma, it isn't a lie.
Go to this link and you will see quite CLEARLY that the copyright belongs to Bordeaux:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bordeauxwine/page21/
You see how Oma Hamou believes she is above the law...
Here's something interesting.
All Travis County District Court activity through December 22 has now be uploaded to iDocket.com.
The citation that Hamou posted on her forum is dated December 21.
Yet the only documents listed as on file for Case D-1-GN-09-003478 are:
"Original Petition/Application" (10/08/2009)
"Asm: Filing Fee" (10/09/2009)
Under the tab for Answers / Citations, there is this entry:
"No Answers/Citations on file"
Now here's what makes this so interesting:
The citation Hamou posted contains the phrase "NOTICE OF ENTRY OF NEW EFILE MANDATE ORDER".
That phrase is a reference to the fact that the 345th District Court of Texas is one of the courts participating in a pilot e-Filing project in Texas. One of the requirements of that pilot is that all documents be loaded onto the system within 30 minutes of receipt by the court.
This means that if that citation was where it is supposed to be, it would have been entered into the computer system before the close of business on December 21.
Yet the iDocket system, which took an upload from Travis County of all activity entered into their system through December 22, shows no citation on file.
Whoever Hamou is using to do her legwork in Texas really ought to take a primer on what gets delivered where.
No wonder no process server has shown up at Bob's house.
Lordy, is there nothing this woman can get right?
(I just loved her story about how, after FOUR continuances at her request, she was caught off guard by having to go to trial "unexpectedly" with only an hour's notice. Made a trip all the way to Austin for a trial, and she doesn't even have her key documents indexed. What a dimwit.)
"Snoopy" posted:
"Nope, she sure didn't [have her key documents indexed] because her legal documents were with either the law firms of Foster, Malich & Blair or George & Brothers"
Interesting.
Where were your lawyers? (It's very odd for a defendant to be in court without her attorneys, you know.)
And what was in those 5 legal boxes you had in your hotel room if not your own copies of the case materials?
Safely in Connecticut, just want to wish everyone a Merry Christmas (if you celebrate it, and if you don't, I hope you at least eat cookies!). So Merry Christmas to you, Blake, and Bob and Rob (homemade bread and good wine, heaven!), Penelope, the entire Kedem clan (I know, I know,just have a cookie!), Sasha, you-know-who in Honolulu, the Grand Shovel and all the minions, my BFF Michele Biernat, the Cowans, the Batchelors, Tina Van Veen, Mr. Refai, Brian Watson, Dave Slater, Lauren Mathew, that nice Judge Triana and of course the poor bisexual retarded anime fanboy, Breadsticks, Debbie, Einnar, poor Leslie, poor Daryn, the imaginary Russian child, the AnonymousOne and all of the other figments of Oma Hamou's imagination.
God bless us every one. Even you, Omes. Have some eggnog and try to be a little less crazy in 2011.
Rebecca Cratchit Jordan
Hey, Oma. I notice the citation indicated the fee had not been paid for the service of process.
Is that maybe the problem with the missing server?
Do you think maybe your check bounced like the check you sent the court to try to seal the Cowan case?
Or maybe the bank declined the charge on the credit card you gave?
There are just so many ways not to pay when it comes to you.
I noticed that as well, Blake (I made the mistake of going over there. It's like the tar baby!)
So in other words, the document could be a fake. Or is at least meaningless at this point.
"Dimwit" is putting it kindly, Blake.
RJ
Okay, "Snoopy". We'll play it your way.
Why weren't Oma's lawyers in court with her on the scheduled trial date?
You know what's so ludicrous about this whole "you're-gonna-be-served-any-minute-now" sideshow?
The way things usually work when someone wants to sue is this:
1. They get all their material and pleadings in order.
2. They choose the proper legal vehicle for their claim.
3. They file well ahead of any deadlines.
4. They obtain a certification.
5. They pay a server fee.
6. They serve the other party.
Steps 3-6 usually play out over a few days.
But how does it happen with Hamou?
She fails to use the proper vehicle for challenging a judgment (an appeal) and chooses a legal vehicle for which she does not qualify (a Bill of Review).
She waits 4 years, 364 days, and 22 hours to file against a 5-year deadline.
She files incomplete pleadings.
Then she goes 1 year, 2 months, and 13 days (against a 1-year deadline) without seeking certification or obtaining service.
Now, at the 1 year, 2 month, and 16th day marker, she's sitting around wondering where the hell the process server is?
These are either the antics of a person who wants to claim she's chomping at the bit to prove her case in court without having her bluff called -- or they're the comical blunderings of a complete moron.
Or, in her case, both.
"Snoopy" posted:
"Wonder if she [Judge Triana Doyle] will agree with Judge Livingston about him [Moshein] being a threat to my friend Oma Hamou you know this is what caused Judge Livingston to slap a restraining order on him."
Probably not.
You see, it was Judge Triana who lifted the temporary restraining order, you numbskull.
Hmmmm.
I notice "Snoopy" keeps ducking the little matter about the fee for service of process not having been noted as paid on the certification.
Beginning to sound more and more as if the bank declined the credit card.
My goodness, she will say anything rather than admit to the fact that there isn't going to be a process server until she pays for a process server. There will be a debtor's exam, which makes me wonder why she thinks Bob Atchison would duck service --- the moment that document lands in his hands, let the good times roll! There will be service for debtor's exam so fast it will make your head spin, Omes.
And "Snoopy", poor baby, you don't celebrate Christmas? I'll bet the real Justin Edwards of the American Film Institute does, Oma. You know, the boy whose identity you stole.
I now have a mental image of Oma as the Grinch. I'm sure she celebrates Christmas by going down chimneys and stealing the toys.
Rebecca
"Snoopy" posted:
"FYI, my friend Oma is with her friends and family right now and is not wondering where the hell a process server is - unlike me, she is celebrating Christmas."
That's odd.
Oma says she has converted to Russian Orthodoxy and taken the name Alexandra (under which she's been sued a few times already, I might add.)
Did no one tell her the Orthodox celebrate Christmas on January 5?
Oh, "Snoopy", I forgot to ask.
Are these the same family and friends who were nowhere to be found when "Alexandra" was in jail in San Bernardino and all her cats were dying for lack of attention?
Or has she gotten a more reliable set of family and friends?
Happy holidays to you, darling Rivka, you should eat all the cookies you want and not gain a pound, darling.
So what do girls like darling Omele get for gifts on the special day? Is that coal thing still going on?
Shalom, and all the best from Mitzeleh, goyische darlings!
More posts from "Snoopy", and still no response to the observation that the fee for service of process was not paid.
So the odds go up the bank declined the credit card charge.
Someone must have noticed a missing wallet in time.
I’ll be nuts for Christmas,
You can count on me.
Please don’t go
And ask me, though,
Where is the service fee?
Christmas Eve will find me
By a glowing screen.
Cursing Rob and cursing Bob,
And being really mean.
Christmas Eve will find me
By a glowing screen;
I’ll win my case on Christmas
But only in my dreams.
Merry Christmas, my little Omele
Away in a Jail Cell
Away in a jail cell, no crib for a bed,
The little con Oma laid down her large head.
The guards in the bright cage looked down where she lay,
The little con Oma asleep until day.
The con games are growing, the scammer awakes.
And little con Oma more lying she makes.
I love me, says Oma, though my house is a sty,
And lend me your card, my credit's gone dry.
Now hear me, little Oma
I ask thee to stay
in that cramped jail cell
Until you can pay.
Bless all the dear victims
Who trusted her line
And give them their justice
And her a big fine.
O Come, O Come, Ye Bail Bondsmen
O come, O come, ye bail bondsmen
And ransom captive Snoopy's friend.
That rants in crazy grammar here
Until the cops again appear.
Get paid! Get paid! ye bail bondsmen
Or leave her longer in the pen.
O come, now friends to set her free
She'll ne'er pay you, she'll ne'er pay me.
In empress dress she looks so grave
But mostly seems she needs a shave.
Get paid! Get paid! ye bail bondsmen
Or leave her longer in the pen.
O come, you scammer, do come near
And pay for service just right here.
No process goes to Bob tonight
Unless that fee is handled right.
Get paid! Get paid! ye bail bondsmen
Or leave her longer in the pen.
O come, thou actress-model, come
And try to lease a modest home.
It's best to sign what you can pay
(And hope the rains stay well away).
Get paid! Get paid! ye bail bondsmen
Or leave her longer in the pen.
O come, O come, the cons run right
As long as men will pay the night.
For valley work she looked okay
But now she shirks the light of day.
Get paid! Get paid! ye bail bondsmen
Or leave her longer in the pen.
Hoo, boy. "Snoopy" had quite an outburst last evening. Of course, he must be frustrated when you consider all that work he put into giving Oma a nice Christmas.
He decorated her pretend beautiful home with that pretend gorgeous Christmas tree.
He lit a pretend roaring fire in that pretend fireplace.
He bought and wrapped all those pretend gifts and stocking stuffers.
He posted himself silly yesterday so that Oma wouldn't have to worry that things were covered. (She's so dignified and spiritual, you know.)
He got all Oma's pretend friends and pretend family together for a pretend quiet evening celebrating Christmas.
But then what came of it all?
Well, it seems Oma/Snoopy forgot to remind Snoopy/Oma that Oma is now Alexandra who is Russian Orthodox -- and they celebrate Christmas 11 days from now on January 5.
So now he's got to research Russian Orthodox Christmas traditions, pretend redecorate that pretend beautiful home all over again with appropriate pretend tschochke, get her pretend friends and family together again, and give her another pretend day off from posting.
It's enough to drive any sockpuppet mad.
Blake you gave us the most WONDERFUL Christmas present!
You caused Oma Hamou to totally and completely melt down! You just KNOW when she calls MEN "bitches" and indulges in such a pity party as she did that you just got right to the very HEART of who and what OMA HAMOU really is.
Not to mention the huge boo boo she made about Christmas.
Which IS IT OMA?? you are ALEXANDRA the devout Russian Orthodox or not??
Well???
Dashing from the cops
In a large black SUV
Through the streets they run
Oma and Debbie!
Process servers chase
Her all the livelong day,
but Oma fears them not
'cause she can run away!
Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Oma runs! Oma hides!
Oma steals away!
This is how she lives, indeed,
to grift another day!
Darlings, such fun! This may be the first time in my life I actually enjoy Christmas Day!
Hokity smokity, Amerikanski friends! Metropolitan of Muscovy has revoked Orthodox card of Alexandra Omanovna for failure to know most basic information!
Alexandra Omanovna, are they not giving you manual? For shameski!
"Snoopy" posted:
"Your Christmas and state of mind in general is dependent on you being able to construct an alternate reality where Oma is suffering excruciating pain."
And Hamou ignored the one-year deadline for serving her Bill of Review, inexplicably waiting fourteen and a half months, and then cranked up her nonsense about serving Bob with a lawsuit during -- the week of Christmas?
You hypocritical moron.
But I'm not complaining. The "expert document examiner" (as seen on TV), the filing with the wrong court, and the missing process server have all made for more merriment over here than an erector set, a box of Lincoln logs, and a Play-do factory combined.
By the way, when are we going to hear "Team Hamou's" response as to why the certification she posted failed to note that fee for service was paid?
More direct hits on Oma Hamou aka Alexandra McConnell (the not very observant Russian Orthodox) pretending to be 'snoopy' who pretends to be the REAL Justin Edwards and who also pretends to be her hugely obese poorly dressed "assistant" debbie.
She can't even write in coherent sentences anymore Blake. You can just see her in her little cat feces filled room, reeking of cat piss, eating cheetohs and wolfing down McDonald's McFlurries, typing away furiously in her rage.
You and Mitz really really really got to her.
It really is the most fun Christmas Day this Jew has spent in years.
I Wonder as I Wander
I wonder as I wander what to rent next,
If they want a deposit, I know I am hexed.
I'm pretty, I'm Oma, so keep the rent low
I wonder as I wander how to get dough.
When Oma birthed Royal, 'twas in a cow's stall.
But no more of that what with cancer and all.
But then from a pocket a wallet did fall.
With some fresh "borrowed" credit she went to the mall.
If Oma thinks she wants just any wee thing
She runs a new ad for a night in a sling.
But real movie acting with good scripts to bring?
She'll have more luck trying to be Larry King.
We three Omas of Hamou are,
Unwilling to divulge just who we are,
Concealed and countin'
on Bob not mountin'
a challenge to our fake star!
Oh,
Star of wonder,
star of light,
Star with no chance of being right
on IMDB
or anywhere else ---
Following yonder star.
Snoopy am I,
I was the first
to be invented by Oma,
I'm not the worst.
My identity stealing,
Oma concealing
that I was a real person once ---
Oh, star of Oma
Star unreal
Star whose identity she had to steal,
Her goodness pleading,
My identity concealing ---
Oma is my real name.
Sandman am I,
I don't exist.
I get trotted out
when Oma is pissed.
Austin "living:,
No real name giving,
Oma is my real name.
Oh, star of Oma,
Star unreal,
star whose identity she didn't steal.
I never existed,
despite which she persisted
in making it seem I did.
Leslie am I,
I am the last.
Even for Oma, I am surpassed
by Breadsticks, Debbie,
Darling Russophile Lady,
I am the last resort.
Oh, star of Oma,
Star with a meager storyline,
Oma's boring, hear her schnorring
about Marcus, Rob and Bob!
Ohhhhh-ohhhhh,
Star of Oma,
Star ridic,
Star who cannot turn a trick,
Backers wooing,
Old guys screwing
Out of their hard-earned cash.
Joy to the Court
Joy to the court, Hamou is back;
She needs help with her files.
Let every clerk prepare her room.
And bailiffs and bondsmen sing,
And bailiffs and bondsmen sing,
And bailiffs and bailiffs and bondsmen sing.
Joy to the jail, Hamou is back;
Let guards their sticks employ;
With bunks and toys,
Cold showers and soap
She tries to feel the joy,
She tries to feel the joy,
She tries, she tries to feel the joy.
No more let sins and sorrows grow,
She's gone again to ground;
She hides to make her con games flow
Far as the curse is found,
Far as the curse is found,
Far as, far as the curse is found.
She runs her cons with smoke and lies,
And makes the victims prove
She thought that checkbook was still good.
It's now time to move,
It's now time to move,
It's now, it's now time to move.
Said Hamid Refai to Thomas Ward,
"Do you know what I know?
Filing for my money, Thomas Ward?
Oma, Oma, running through the night
With a con as big as the sky?
With a con as big as the sky!"
Said Brian Watson to Dave Slater on the phone,
"Did you get paid like I did? Texas lawyer who repped her in court? Did you get paid like I did?"
Oma, Oma, running through the night
With a con as big as the sky!
With a con as big as the sky!
Said Dave Slater to Oma Hamou,
"Where's my check, my bill is due, Hamou!"
Needs his dough right away, Oma H!
Tough luck, tough luck,
Dave, you won't be paid,
You got sucked into her con.
On the first day of Christmas,
Oma said to me ---
I'll get away with fraud, wait and see!
On the second day of Christmas, Oma said to me ---
Two bad checks,
And I'll get away with fraud, wait and see!
On the third day of Christmas,
Oma said to me ---
Three judgments lost,
Two bad checks,
And I'll get away with fraud, wait and see!
On the fourth day of Christmas,
Oma said to me ---
Four scams a-scammin'
Three judgments lost,
Two bad checks
And I'll get away with fraud, wait and see!
On the fifth day of Christmas,
Oma said to me ---
Five easy marks!
Four Armenian ex-husbands,
Three geriatrics,
Two Russian foundations,
One Eric Cowan,
And I'll get away with fraud, wait and see!
, darling, seriously, I'm running out of Christmas carols I kind of know! But this has been so festive!
Mitzele, the Spirit of the Goyische Holidays
Nice quiet weekend so far! No process servers, no FBI storm troopers,
LOTS of entertainment watching Oma Hamou lose it totally, melting down into incoherent sentences, name calling and outright libel of an attorney, all because she has gone down in utter flames on all counts.
Happy Boxing Day!
I see Oma is still in her drunken rage.
1. The issue was about OMA and BOB. Not "enigma". So anything about "engima" is not at issue in the trial.
2. I wonder if Judge Gisela Triana-Doyle is happy with the fact that you can't even get her NAME RIGHT!
More entertainment!
Good grief, I take Christmas off and discover that you all went caroling! Sitting here in snowy Connecticut, with zero chance of getting back into New York today (and probably tomorrow), but that's alright. There's a fire, Frobe is sleeping in front of it, the house is hushed in the snowfall, and I have a cup of coffee and my laptop.
Just right for catching up on Oma's nonsense.
Girlfriend, why haven't you paid the service fee? Is Blake right? Card denied?
And "Snoopy", I know how you feel. I usually have to bathe and cover myself Chanel Number 5 after reading your nonsense, girlfriend, so I totally get your need for a hot tub on Christmas Eve. On the other hand, lady, the statement kind of diminished your street cred as a guy. Which of course you don't have. But still. Did you get anything for Justin Edwards of the American Film Institute for Christmas? You know, for ripping off the kid's identity?
Rebecca
Blake,
Did I mention that we had a layover in Holland on the way back from Austria? It was fascinating to see how big some of the people were, thanks to that good Dutch cheese. I was especially taken by a very large woman named Debbie, who must have weighed several Stone. Haven! Oops. I mean, HeavenLY!
Rebecca
By the way. I realized last night that Oma Hamou will never ever escape her trailer trash roots.
You know, the horrible spelling, awful grammar, foul mouth, and the desperate, psychopathic need to be "SOMEBODY": a Russian Empress, a jet setter, a busy "motion picture exec", adored by legions of fans and a sociopath...
She can't grasp her awful reality, the evictions, bad checks, hordes of cats, lack of a JOB, huge debts, screwed up kid, packing up every few months, and only able to scrape together a few bucks by peddling junk on craigslist, like old cat condos and the like...
It's all her own fault. She isn't pretty anymore. She can't use her crotch like she used to and so her marks become older and older and less wealthy...
She can't accept responsibility for a single thing in her wasted life.
Oh, still no process servers.
and notice poor Oma Hamou's pathetic holding on to the past, keeping on bringing up six, seven year old stuff over and over and over
but IGNORING her pathetic reality of her life today, and the fact that nothing has happened...No Bill of Review, no FBI, No police, no MOVIE, No JOB, NO MONEY, and totally busted publicly about her cancer scams and habit of passing bad checks, and being a nightmare renter.
"Snoopy" posted this on December 23:
"I've been told they [the process serves] are on their way to you"
Did they get lost?
Are they traveling on crutches by way of Dallas?
Or did they find out the service fee had not been paid?
Blake, I think the process servers are getting a ride over from the FBI agents...
"Snoopy" posted:
"I heard Judge Triana G. Doyle is pissed off reading the lies you said about her on your libelous blog about Oma"
And I heard that this judge could not care less about you.
Your claim to be "in the know" about what's going on in this judge's mind would be a bit more credible if you actually knew her name. It's Gisela Triana-Doyal, not Triana G. Doyle, you dimwit.
Is this scoop from the judge's inner thoughts from the same source that said the missing process servers were "on their way" four days ago?
Regarding Curt Baggett, Hamou's "expert document examiner" ........
Not only does he offer cut-rate "quick analysis" by fax or mail, he participates with a Bart Baggett in something called the Handwriting University.
Gotta love this -- one of Curt Baggett's "courses" at this "university" is "Life Changing Benefits in Grapho-Therapy". (Wonder if it leads to a PhD?)
Also found this site that tracks various rip-offs and which has a thread on this shady Baggett operation:
http://www.ripoffreport.com/adult-career-continuing-education/phaneendar-b-n/phaneendar-b-n-victimized-fro-acf89.htm
Boy, I bet Bob's attorney will have a field day with the cross examination of this "expert".
Where are those process servers?
"Snoopy" posted:
"That nice Judge down in Austin [whose name I don't know] .........."
This lickspittle tripe sounds as if Hamou's trying to wheedle one of her cats into responding to her wishes.
Here, kitty, kitty.
Nice judgie, judgie.
Given the number of judges who have handed down criminal and civil verdicts against her (around 20), it's wonderful that she's found such a nice pretend friend in Judge Triana G. Doyle.
Especially since Judge Gisela Triana-Doyal views her existence as ........ Well, I doubt if Judge Doyal views her existence at all.
My my my. Palmdale Road Runner is VERY interested in the blog. FOUR reads already today.
Still no Process Servers. I'm SURE they are riding along with the FBI...
-- A two-part post, due to length --
It's amazing how con artists can seem to find each other across vast distances. Do they have some kind of homing device implanted when they graduate from Grift U?
Here is how Hamou's "Supplemental Brief" describes her "expert document examiner":
"Mr. Curt Baggett is a Dallas Expert Court Examiner, a skilled authority in handwriting identification and has completed over 3,500 cases. He has examined documents and/or testified in court cases in all 50 states, Washington, D.C., the Bahamas, Brazil, Canada, Chile, England, Ireland, Mexico, Pakistan, Pureto Rico, Thailand and New Zealand, Korea, China, Australia and Denmark.".
But here is what a Texas appellate court case reveals about him (Brown v State, 1999 Tex. App. LEXIS 805 [Ap Dallas TX 1999]):
"Brown contends that the trial court erred in overruling his objection to the prosecutor’s argument during the guilt or innocence phase of the trial in which he called defense witness Curtis Baggett a 'charlatan'. Baggett testified that he was a psychologist, hypnotherapist, psychotherapist, and graphologist, and that he had been designated by the court as an expert witness in this case. The appellate court noted that Baggett had not been properly qualified as an expert, and Baggett retracted his testimony that the court had designated him as an expert in this case. Baggett testified that he is not licensed as a psychologist or a psychotherapist and has not practiced therapy full-time for fifteen years, although he still conducts occasional weight loss and stress management seminars."
-- Continued from above --
So Baggett had to RETRACT his claim that he was a court qualified expert.
And a Texas appellate court let stand the prosecutor's description of him at trial as a CHARLATAN.
And, besides being a self-professed document expert, he's also a self-identified psychologist, hypnotherapist, and psychotherapist. (He's also been a realtor and a "financial planner." But the list of his numerous career pinnacles just seemed too silly to repeat in full.)
Hamou is an utter fool to present such a quack to the court as an expert anything.
And Baggett was an utter fool to communicate the opinion that Bob Atchison "committed fraud on the court" if he thinks his quack testimony is going to support anything.
The cross examination of Baggett would be a laugh riot ...... if, of course, there really were going to be a hearing, anyway.
Now, where is that service of process, dammit. I can't wait to see Baggett in court alongside Hamou as they mount their bulletproof case of fraud and perjury against Bob Atchison.
Oh, oh dear.
Well maybe Ms. Hamou / McConnell could take one of that clever man's stress management seminars?
And the weight loss seminar! Why, what an opportunity for Debbie.
Well, my pets. I've got to run. I just had a few minutes to grab a look at this always scintillating blog while my nephew Keith ran for a potty break. He's over this evening to watch "The Deerhunter" again, one of his very favorite movies.
Frankly, my dears, I could do without watching it. It's just so very bleak. But I just can't say no to Keith. He's such a dear man, and he works so hard all kinds of days and hours.
Dear Penny,
How were your holidays? I am stuck in Connecticut in the middle of the fiercest blizzard I can remember in years. Luckily we have a HAVEN by the STONE fireplace. Tonight we had a delicious dinner of roast beef and asparagus with HOLLANDAISE sauce, just a DEB because it is so FATTENING. Oh dear, I meant dab.
Just a little to much holiday wassail, I suppose.
Merry Christmas to you and Betty Ford (or whatever her name is!),
Rebecca
This just keeps getting better regarding Oma Hamou's "expert document examiner".
Case 199-80166-88, 199th District Court, Collin County, Texas.
Offense: Felony Aggravated Assault
Date of Offense: 11/12/1987
Curtis Leo Baggett was indicted by a grand jury and pled not guilty.
He was convicted on 08/17/1988 and sentenced to four years probation, a $5,000 fine, and court costs.
Also, Ripoff Report 569087 reports that:
"Curtis L. Baggett falsely claimed in at least one deposition in a Federal Court in Georgia where he swore that he had studied as an apprentice under (Board Certified) Ray Walker, QDE, for 10 YEARS. Curtis Baggett has NEVER had a personal or professional relationship (Board Certified) Ray Walker, QDE."
This is the man Oma Hamou says she has hired to go to court to testity on her behalf that Bob Atchison committed perjury and fraud.
Interesting that one multiple-convicted felon would enlist the services of another convicted felon to sue a man who has never run afoul of the courts or the law in his life.
Of course, this suit is all in Hamou's twisted mind. It has no more substance to it than her acting career, her modeling career, her charity career, her film production career, her deep Orthodox faith, her hordes of admirers and defenders.
I wonder if Hamou's other two "expert document examiners" have credentials up to the snuff of Mr. Baggett's.
Do they, too, offer "quick analysis" by fax or mail?
Do they, too, deeply undercut the fees charged by "other professionals"?
Are they, too, "seen on TV"?
Are they, too, convicted felons?
Have they, too, perjured themselves about their credentials?
Have appellate courts let stand prosecutors' claims that they, too, are charlatans?
Do they, too, run weight loss seminars, sell real estate, do hypnosis, administer unlicensed psychotherapy?
I know Bob is probably tired of Hamou's years-long obsessive internet blathering about suing him to vindicate her court loss to him some years ago. And I understand Rob's explanations about why a Bill of Review will never be heard on the merits in this case.
But, frankly, I will be deeply disappointed if Hamou doesn't prance into a courtroom with her ludicrous pleadings; her rigged and corrupt witnesses; her misrenderings of judges' names; and her chronic inability to utter one true, logical, and grammatical sentence.
The debtor's exam would be fun, in a pitiful sort of way. But the cross examinations of her and her witnesses could be the comedy act of the decade.
"Snoopy"-who-is-Oma posted:
"Forgery & Fraud in the state of Texas is a crime so is perjury, cybertaalking, interstate stalking, harassment etc."
Such as posting all over the internet for years that you are going to sue Bob Atchison just any minute?
Such as posting all over the internet for years that Bob Atchison and Rob Moshein are the subjects of active FBI and police investigations and are on the verge of being arrested?
As for perjury, trot your "expert Texas document examiner" into court and let us see some real perjury take place when he testifies as to his credentials and his court certification as an expert.
It will be interesting to see the judge's reaction when it is pointed out that you submitted a brief to the court that identified a proven perjurer and convicted felon as a court-certified document "expert" and represented that he would be the one proving your case against Atchison.
I see in your last windbag of a post, you continue to ignore the issue of why no process service fee has been paid for your famous Bill of Review.
And I see you completely avoid the implosion of your crank claim that you have "proof" from a real life world-famous "expert document examiner" that Bob Atchison faked documents or committed fraud.
C'mon, Hamou. Show your sagging ass in a court in Texas.
There's a debtor's exam and several judgments with your name on them just waiting to see your face in that courtroom.
I swear, woman. You need to have a corrections officer sit you down and refresh your memory of what jail is like.
Know one who could help?
Good morning all! Guess what? Doorbell rang a while ago....and it was
UPS!! a delayed christmas gift, from NYC, caught up in the snow. Still no Process servers or FBI agents. Was Quantico snowed in too??
Watched The Caine Mutiny last night. I love that movie. Was thinking about how easily Lieutenant Keith saw how insane Quieg was. I wonder what Lt. Keith would make of Oma's story if he heard....Old Yellowstain indeed.
RJ, you able to get back to the City yet? I hope you will steer wide berth of the Holland Tunnel. I know I would.
No, Rob, still in Connecticut. We had over two feet, and there are five foot drifts. Added to that is the fact that my brother's place is in a fairly rural area, with a long, long driveway, and you can imagine that I won't be out until sometime later this week. No worries. It is actually quite peaceful, and of course beautiful. It looks like a Currier and Ives print.
Meanwhile, I notice that Oma is avoiding all answers to all questions. I know Blake is of the opinion that her credit card was denied when she tried to pay the process server fee, but surely this is the time for all of her "friends" to step up to the plate and contribute. "You" keep saying that "you" want her to be free of Bob Atchison, Arch-Diabolarch of the Universe, how about taking up a collection to give the old girl a break? If one can judge by Blake's posts, he might spot you the twenty bucks or whatever it is himself simply for the pleasure of hauling you and the hapless Mr. Baggett into court so that Bob can at least get moral satisfaction (since of course there is no money --- or does Mr. Baggett have assets?).
I'm off to take Frobisher on a walk through the snow. It's hilarious. He plunges into drifts and disappears.
Rebecca
Even more on Curt Baggett, Hamou's "expert document examiner":
- two theft arrests
- felony assault conviction
- driving without license charge
- failure to produce ID charge
- fleeing the scene of an accident charge
My goodness. No wonder Hamou sought out his services.
They are soul mates!
What fun it will be so see Oma, acting as her own cracker jack attorney, examine this jamoke on the stand.
So, Rob -- still no sign of that process server?
Oh, yeah. Forgot to mention he's in his 70's.
What is it with Hamou and old men? Is there some classified site where old men hang out looking for younger women?
Geez, just when I think Oma Hamou has reached the bounds of rock solid stupidity (courtesy of her less than stellar white trailer trash upbringing), she keeps on showing new limits.
Ummmm, idiot. Courts do not use "Roget's Thesaurus" for legal guidance. They use the law.
Cripes, Hamou.
Still can't get that judge's name right, huh?
It's Triana-Doyal, not Triana-Doyle.
Of course, she's not on the bench that hears Bills of Review.
And besides, no one is going to hear the Bill of Review other than to assess and then reject jurisdiction.
A shame, really, because I'd just love to hear you explain to the court Curt Baggett's expert credentials to which you attested in your "Supplemental Brief".
Good luck showing those 3500 cases all over the world in which his "expert" testimony has prevailed.
By the way, I hope your family showed you great support when you told them about your cancer. It must have been quite a shock to them.
Or will be.
Blake,
One small correction. No one will hear the Bill of Review UNLESS Judge Dietz grants the Motion to Retain. He has limited authority to look at anything other than 1. Is Oma Hamou even entitled to prosecute a Bill of Review. Since there is no Appeal or Motion for New Trial on file, that answer is: NO.
2. Did Oma Hamou act in a timely manner to prosecute a Bill of Review within the 12 month statutory period as set forth by the Texas Supreme Court? Oma Hamou failed to do ANYTHING for FOURTEEN MONTHS, and STILL does not have Proof of Service of Citation on file with the Court. Therefore, the answer must be NO.
Amazing what people working in the Courthouse will tell you "off the record" when you have a chat with them and they understand the circumstances. Just because Judge Dietz hasn't put pen to paper yet, doesn't mean it won't be DWOP'd.
On that note. STILL no process servers have showed up.
I'm still chuckling over the "expert document examiner" that Hamou touted in her brief to "prove" Atchison committed fraud.
A convicted felon.
A hypnotist, psychotherapist, and realtor.
A man who fakes his graphology credentials.
A man who has been forced in court to retract his claim of being "court certified".
An self-proclaimed expert whom a prosecutor labeled a "charlatan".
She might want to switch horses in midstream to other "experts", but she's still stuck with explaining her use of Baggett in the brief she has already submitted to the court.
And, given that her other two supposed "experts" (if they even exist) were also probably procured off the internet, the betting is that their "expertise" will stack up to be pretty much the same as Baggett's.
Well, Blake, this is still all pretty much par for Oma Hamou's putt putt course.
She makes a huge deal out of nothing. Trots out crap, to try to support fiction. That is all she has ever done.
She ran up bills on Amex to "prove" she had a "movie". She puts out heavily photoshopped pics of her horse face on someone else's body to "prove" she was a "model"...She makes up snoopy, sandman, hugefat debbie the Holland Tunnel, to "prove" she has "legions of supporters".
She is still nothing but the ill educated, white trailer trash from rural Michigan who probably slept with her teachers to get passing grades in High School. At least with her English teacher for certain!
the Bill of Review is nothing but mental masturbation for Hamou. She gets orgasms out of screaming how "bob will get his" yeah, and his little dog too...Just like her sexual orgasms from screaming about FBI investigations too, for years and years.... Like I said, at the end of the day, she is self stimulating. Nothing more.
When Judge Dietz puts pen to paper any day now, the Bill of Review is DWOP'd. Gone.
she will find some new idea for a dildo, and start more screaming about it. Just wait and see.
Oh, forgot to mention. Greg King and Penny Wilson (you know the ones Oma Hamou keeps quoting about how much they "hate" Bob and me...)'s new book "Resurrection of the Romanovs", is out, and Bob and I are thanked quite prominently in the acknowledgments for working with them.
It looks as if the book will be a success for them. Am very happy for them both!
"Snoopy" posted:
"So, Bob is back to old tricks 'dodging proess servers'"
This is typical Hamou.
Bob is under no obligation to sit at home waiting for a process server. He is free to go about his business as he sees fit. When the process server shows up at a time Bob is around, he will accept the process. It's just that simple
In fact, Bob has only been involved in two legal actions, both of which he attended as appointed. (And both of which he won.)
Hamou, on the other hand, has more than a dozen default judgments against her. Recently, both she and Jim Sproul were served in the Hamid Refai case, and both failed to appear.
Hamou also has an outstanding bench warrant for her arrest in Los Angeles County for failure to appear in court.
In order to secure her appearance before a judge in the Batchelor prosecution, she had to be thrown in jail under a $1 million bond for two weeks.
Hamou just loves to try to confuse appearance with substance. She thinks that by creating websites and posting photoshopped pictures, she can transform herself in the eyes of others into an accomplished actress, a successful model, a major film producer, the CEO of an international charity, a woman who lives in luxury with a household staff, etc.
In fact, she is a woman with multiple felony convictions, who rents and trashes houses she cannot afford, who passes checks continuously on empty or closed accounts, who ducks court appearances, who lives on the lam, and who gets driven around by someone else lest a simple traffic stop get her thrown into the clink yet again on an outstanding warrant.
The law does not require someone to sit at home and await a process server. The law does require a person who has received service to appear when and where summoned.
It's a law Hamou routinely violates and will continue to do. The same cannot be said of Bob Atchison.
Blake, Blake, Blake....
You make a rational, reasoned, reasonable point...
unfortunately, Oma Hamou is incapable of understanding anything rational, reasoned or reasonable. She is psychopathic....
It's a law Hamou routinely violates and will continue to do.
Even more so Blake.
The LAW states that Oma Hamou does not have the legal right to pursue a Bill of Review UNLESS she filed a Motion for New Trial or Appeal. She did not YET she flies in the face of the law by pursuing the Bill of Review which the LAW says she is NOT entitled.
the LAW states that Oma Hamou is a legal debtor to Bob Atchison, yet Oma Hamou disregards this law by refusing to pay the money a COURT ORDERED HER TO PAY.
The LAW states that Oma Hamou had twelve months to do something about the Bill of Review, but she DISREGARDS the law and does NOTHING until the Court puts it on the DISMISSAL docket....
The LAW says you have to be CAREFUL about writing checks, yet Oma Hamou keeps on writing checks ILLEGALLY on closed or empty accounts...
The LAW says you have to pay your rent IN FULL and ON TIME every month. Yet Oma Hamou disregards the law and keeps getting evicted....
I could go on....
Speaking of stalking:
Oma Hamou pretending to be 'snoopy' wrote:
I don't believe he's out of town. Time will tell...we will see if Bob Atchison really is out of town or just sitting upstairs :wink:
Really? so now Oma you are stalking my HOUSE? Why am I not surprised......You are SUCH the hypocrite.
Why is it ok for YOU to stalk BOB but complain about "stalking" yourself...
lying bitch....
snoopy the psychopathic alter of OMa Hamou said: So your "room mate" Bob Atchison really is home, interesting.... :wink:"
Really? just where did I say that? I didn't. All I said was that you were planning to stalk Bob and my house to try to prove Bob was home...
Oma Hamou appears to be a psychotic stalker
Dear Rob,
"Appears to be"? You're too kind.
Back in New York just in time for the madness of the New Year, which should be muted tonight because of the heaps of snow still piled up all over the place. I am heading to a party this evening that should be highly enjoyable.
I hope you and Bob have a happy New Year, Rob, and I wouldn't worry unduly about Oma Hamou. There is little left for her but sputtering, as Blake has shredded her "arguments", and there is basically nothing left.
Best wishes to all,
Rebecca
One thing of which you can always be sure -- anything Hamou attempts is going to turn out to be comical one way or the other.
With 5 years to file for a Bill of Review, she waited 4 years, 364 days, 23.5 hours.
With 12 months to seek certification, she waited 14 months and 13 days to request it.
But now? She's jumping up and down and holding her breath like a three year old having a tantrum because Bob Atchison is not waiting on his front porch when the process server comes around.
Bob will accept service when he's around to do it. He's under no obligation to do otherwise.
You, however, were obligated to file an appeal if you wanted to try to overturn the jury's finding against you. You did not do so.
And you, however, were obligated to seek certification within one year of filing for a Bill of Review. You did not do so.
It's not particularly interesting that Bob is not sitting at home when it suits you. Most people wouldn't be.
What's interesting here is why you failed to contest the judgment in the proper way at the proper time.
The only rational explanation is that you do not want actually to be caught in court. You just want to prattle about overturning the judgment against you on the internet ad nauseum.
And it was only our calling your bluffs that backed you into the corner of even going through the motions of pretending to be serious about this.
It's the same thing you've done with claims you're going to have your felony convictions in three different states expunged.
It's the same thing you've done in claiming you tried to make the bad check to Mrs. Batchelor right without her having to get you prosecuted.
It's the same thing you've done in calling Thomas Ward with a claim you want to resolve the Hamid Refai matter but then hanging up abruptly when he asked how to reach you. (Interesting also that you even made that call, while claiming on the internet that you have no obligation to Refai.)
You even produce "evidence" from an "expert document examiner" who is a charlatan and a convicted felon himself.
You are a fraud in everything you say and do.
It's why you have three felony convictions and a dozen and a half civil judgments against you.
Hokity smokity Amerikanskii Friendskis! Is Happy New Year I wish for you from over large green sea! Here is no problem with Alexandra Omanova as she has been banned from Motherland by Holy Church and Holy Putin. One for not knowing Russian Christmas and two for not giving rubles where rubles were supposed to go, eta pravda!
Do svidanya!
Sasha
Blake, you missed the really telling point that proves Oma Hamou has lost all grip of reason.
First pretending to be 'snoopy' she wrote:
So your "room mate" Bob Atchison really is home, interesting.... :wink:
THE VERY NEXT SENTENCE SHE WROTE:
And I didn't say he was there did I? I wonder...
She can't even keep her lies straight in the same post.
Woooa.
"Snoopy" really seems to be losing his/her grip over on the "Ask Oma" forum.
Seems that alerting the Portland Cancer Society that one of their volunteers (Michele Biernat of Benefit Design Group) supports and vouches for the character of a woman who runs cancer scams for money is really getting under the little pup's skin.
And the doggie is barking his little head off that we uncovered the criminal and con artist history of her "expert document examiner".
You know, Curt Baggett, whose credentials Hamou lauded to the skies in her Supplemental Brief to the court. Four years probation for aggravated assault. Called a "charlatan" by a Texas prosecutor, which was allowed to stand by the Texas Court of Appeals. Falsely claims to have been the student of a real document examiner. Had to retract in court his claim that he was a "court certified" document examiner. Also works as a hypnotist, psychoanalyst, financial planner, and realtor.
I can't tell if Hamou is pissed that she got snookered by this scam artist or if she is pissed that we found out she sought out a scam artist to try to lend weight to her claim that Atchison committed fraud.
Either way, she's apparently choking down bile that she got conned herself and is now having to walk in the shoes of her many victims.
So first off, darlings, Happy New Year to all of you, may it be filled with prosperity, starting with the recovery of the 23 grand that darling Omele owes you, Bob.
And darling Omele, I want you to promise me that you will try and clean up your mouth during 2011, darling. Darling, you seem to have an eye for the older men, and well, darling, the altekockers aren't going to be all that happy with a potty mouth like yours. Since you're no spring chicken yourself anymore, darling, Aunt Mitzi thinks that you should take advantage of anything you can, darling!
How did you spend the New Year, darling? Have a date? Or just hanging around the old folks home looking for a likely "mark"?
Darling, I just thought of something! That nice Mr. Baggett is in your age range, and Omele, darling, you already have so much in common. Think of it, darling! The two of you can be some kind of geriatric Bonnie and Clyde!
I suggest it because I care, darling. So much!
Mitzi Kedem
O Mighty Shovel,
I see that the orb has almost completed another sun cycle, O Lord of the Tic Tacs, and I just want you to know that I have spent the entire past sun cycle diligently upon your behalf (not like that fat cat and dead Minion Daryn, Your Fluffiness!) and I am prepared to spend the coming sun cycle in the same manner.
That's the kind of minion I am.
There has been a slight glitch, however. I have been traveling with the large-jawed woman and her entourage of dwarves ever since the filming of the epic masterpiece that will soon be on the shelves of finer video stores everywhere. Actually, we have been driving around Nevada and Texas dropping copies off, and I must say that all of the video stores have seemed happy to get them. They turned on festive red lights everywhere, and gave numerous private showings to customers in little booths at the rear of the emporiums. The large-jawed woman was greeted as a celebrity and would autograph the outside of the DVD box. She used a picture of herself jumping over a small fire on the cover, only this time it was from a long time ago when she could still do that. She is still a little uncomfortable sitting since the incident in Utah.
The dwarves decided that they could market themselves in the "industry", whatever that means. I am happy to report that I was not used in the video, since the large-jawed woman looked at me naked and said "you can't make butter with a toothpick", whatever that means. It is apparently a Terran joke, since all of the other dwarves giggled. They have adopted stage names as well: Lusty, Horny, Studly, Tingly and Sylvester. My name is "E.T. : Bone Home", and the large-jawed woman told me to tell anyone who asks that "E.T." stands for "extra thick". I don't understand, but she says if I don't ever remove my pants, it should work.
Anyway, we are all in the bushes around a Terran residence in Austin. The large-jawed woman has parked the Gremlin down at a Dunkin' Donuts and left us instructions that we are to keep an eye out for her "arch-nemesis". In the meantime, she is working her way through a couple of dozen lard-based delicacies. Tingly just said her "arch-nemesis" is a scale, and that if she doesn't lay off the glazed donuts, the next video will have to be shot in Cinemascope.
Happy New Year, Your Sparkliness!
Your faithful minion,
"E.T. : Bone Home"
(really Illuminati, did I fool you?)
This is no fooling The Grand Shovel, you minion creature.
I even knew about the toothpick, you fool. Just why did you think that trucker Bruce let you go?
Happy New Year One and All!
Should be great. my best buddy is coming out for the week from LA to keep me company. We will have a great time.
OH and by the by, someone in Ohio, Atlantic Ohio specifically, western, close to Nebraska actually, is VERY interested in Oma Hamou, having googled her name, and read all about her. I wonder why?
Dear Oma,
I'm confused. You put up website after website attacking Bob Atchison and Rob Moshein; you have done your best to ruin their business through your constant attacks --- none of which have been proven to have a foundation, unlike, say, your record of malfeasance that is documented by court records, judgments, etc--- and yet you are the one being stalked? I don't think so, girlfriend.
You may have an explanation for everything you have done: the stiffing of landlords, the destruction of their property, the fleecing of old men, the bilking of companies and individuals for your fake movie "project", the nauseating way you treated Markell and Pushkin in general, the theft of Justin Edwards' identity --- but the explanation is such that it only satisfies someone like you. Someone who accepts no responsibility for her actions, and who thinks that the world owes her a living.
Rebecca Jordan
RJ,
It isn't that Oma Hamou thinks the world "owes her a living" so much (though she DOES...)as it is Oma Hamou believes the world owes her to be SOMEBODY IMPORTANT.
She has never shaken her white trailer trash deer killing West Virginia and rural no where roots. She honestly BELIEVES that the world owes her being a "wealthy" person living in big houses with servants and "taste" driving a Jag convertible, and hordes of adoring fans who admire her beauty, professional movie making skills and her charitable good works internationally, being recognised by Presidents and State Departments for her achievements.
Seriously, this is what is in her head.
She can not come to terms of her reality:
She is a middle aged, liposuctioned dyed hair nobody.
She lives beyond her meager means in rental housing she can't afford, Hording cats, pretending to have servants
She has done NOTHING in the last ten years that could be seen as a genuine contribution to anything...all the records show is debt after debt after judgment after judment, bad check after bad check, and a Felony charge and weeks slapped in JAIL. Instead of servants and fans, she has nothing but a morbidly obese "assistant" co-conspirator to her criminal activity, a fake internet identity stolen from a kid at Pepperdine years ago, and uses an older man's sham business checking accounts to run her scams...
What her head tells her she "is" can't accept what she REALLY IS, thus her psychopathic behavior.
Dear Rob,
I do get it, but it is still somewhat sad. When I was a little girl I wanted to be a ballerina, a nun and a princess. Ballet lessons put an end to one fantasy, my image of nuns was derived from a movie called Come to the Stable, with Loretta Young (I think) heading a group of nuns roughing it in suburban Connecticut (which made it handy), and while I was a princess to my father, it dawned upon me fairly early in life that to get an actual tiara on my head was a pretty dim prospect. My point is that as children, we are all pretty much self-centered little beasts. But when we become adults, we are expected to have more realistic ideas about the universe and our place in it, ideas which seem to have totally escaped Oma Hamou.
Sad when you think about it. And annoying, of course.
Rebecca
Well, there are some people of modest beginnings who do go on to realize great dreams.
But they have all or some useful combination of the following:
- talent
- intelligence
- vision
- luck
Based on the insipidly melodramatic script for "A Matter of Honour" and her turns peddling male enhancement pills, we can pretty much rule out talent in the case of Oma Hamou.
Based on the nonsensical blather laced with internal inconsistencies and sometimes indecipherably bad grammar, spelling, and punctuation that she posts day in and day out, we can rule out intelligence.
As for vision, she does have some. However, given its expression in that comically egoistic poster of her dressed as an "empress", it's pretty clear there's not much of a market for her kind of vision.
And luck. This one's a bit hard. She has been somewhat lucky in her victims over the years, finding marks (often older men) who are compromised in one way or another so that she gets away with quite a lot, if often by the skin of her teeth. On the other hand, about the best her gold-digging has turned up on any sustained basis is Jim Sproul. So her luck is at best a draw.
Given the tools she's working with here, Rebecca, your chances of gaining a real-life tiara were not, relatively speaking, any worse.
All one needs to do is look at one sentence in the Holland Tunnel Rant to show how psychopathic a liar Oma Hamou is:
She claims the Felony Forgery charge was dropped she was "innocent" and there "was no evidence".
I guess she must think Brian Stodgehill the DA on the case is a big fat liar. Anyone is free to all DA Stodgehill and ask him. He remembers her case without even having to review the file. He is MOST EXPLICIT on the phone that his office wanted to prosecute Oma Hamou aka Alexandra McConnell for FORGERY. Mrs. Batchelor needed the money Oma Hamou owed her, and so they BROKERED the deal to drop charges IF Oma Alexandra PAID VICTIM RESTITUTION. Oma kept dragging out the process because she didn't have the money, but in the end Oma Alexandra PAID VICTIM RESTITUTION. The Court was VERY CLEAR that Huiku Batchelor was ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL'S VICTIM,and only dropped the FELONY prosecution once RESTITUTION was paid.
See how insane Oma is with her lying blather??
Poor Oma. Still caught up in psychopathic lying. "IF" Bryan Stodgehill is "on record" saying he never said what he told us, then SHOW THE PROOF. Post it. You aren't afraid to post things you have...
but you won't. Ever.
Why? 2 important reasons:
1. He is NOT 'on record' anywhere with that statement.
2. Nobody on the planet needs to take "your word". They are free to pick up the phone and ask the DA HIMSELF. Bryan Stodgehill: 760-243-8600
I know what he has told the people who contacted ME after they spoke with him....Which is consistent with what I said, and shows you LIE.
"of course" they don't want you to post the document Oma. The voices in your head told you that because YOU DON"T HAVE ANYTHING TO POST.
Bryan Stodgehill was MOST EMPHATIC that he was quite happy to discuss the case with anyone interested.
Seriously Oma, nobody believes your lies anymore. I think even Michele Biernat has abandoned ship on you. The nice folks at the Cancer Society were sure concerned about your cancer scam of Hamid Refai, which was confirmed to them by Refai's lawyer. That had to be good enough even for Biernat's challenged mental capacity to grasp...
I don't believe you. Blake doesn't believe you. RJ doesn't believe you. Mrs Batchelor doesn't believe you, Eric Cowan doesn't believe you, Bob doesn't even CARE enough to believe you, Brian Stodgehill doesn't believe you, Hamid Refai doesn't believe you, Thomas Ward doesn't believe you, Chris Malish doesn't beleive you, Dunn and Bradstreet didn't believe you..
So. produce a list of real people who DO believe you and are willing to confirm it...
Oh, that will be in the same secret file as Stodgehill's "record" I'm sure...
Oh, and PLEASE post your confirmation that Judge Triana denied anything. Im SURE that if I HAD lied, she would INSIST on her denial being published...
so....publish it.
Despite having been given Judge Triana-Doyal's correct name very clearly, Hamou still botches it.
Today "Snoopy" posted:
" law enforcement Judge Gisella Triana Doyle"
Of course, the name is Gisela Triana-Doyal.
Even Hamou is not that stupid. I think it's pretty clear what's going on here.
Hamou wants to post all kinds of things about this judge on her "Ask Oma" forum (omahamou.com/oma), but she doesn't want an internet search of the judge's name by anyone -- and especially the judge -- to hit on her forum.
I sent Baggett a copy of all the posts that have gone out to the blogosphere about his criminal history and his courtroom shenanigans that we have uncovered as a result of Hamou's posting his name and supposed "evidence" on the internet. Hope he enjoys the publicity.
And, Hamou ...... before you start screeching about "witness tampering" -- a witness is someone who gives testimony under oath in a court, not someone whose opinion you post on the internet. By putting his name and the supposed "evidence" he provided you on the internet, you have left him wide open to be checked out and reported on by anyone else on the internet.
That's something you have never grasped, though, isn't it.
By putting yourself out on the internet as a model, actress, film producer, CEO of a charity, subject of glowing press stories, abused wife, victim, etc., you made the credibility of those claims fair game for anyone who wanted to check them out and counter them.
Tough cookies, Cookie.
Oma said:
Fact the Cancer Society wants him and his friends to stop making these kind of posts and want no part of this mess between him, Bob and Oma – NONE!
Funny, but we haven't heard a WORD from them. One would think if they really felt this way, they would mention it to us....
Hmmmm.
"Snoopy's" grammar (such as it is) if falling apart again, as it does when he/she gets beside himself/herself with frustration.
Note his/her rant about the American Cancer Society and Michele Biernat. Seems Rob struck some kind of nerve there.
And, yes, they would like not to have their organization mentioned on the internet in association with a woman who runs cancer scams. But the issue is not our posts. They clearly understand the issue is Michele Biernat's support of such a woman while professing to be a public advocate for real victims of cancer.
Actually, Rob, I don't think I mentioned to you that Mr. Black asked me to send him any information I had on Oma Hamou and Refai in writing, as he wanted to be sure he had the correct spelling of all the parties involved.
He certainly gave me no impression of not wanting to know anything about this.
And far from asking that we not surface this issue, he felt strongly I should contact the Los Angeles branch of the American Cancer Society to let them know what was going on in their region. (It seems the regions operate independently of each other, and he felt the contact coming from us would have more impact than coming from him in Portland.)
ummm Oma, the Court COULD ask me to stop if they felt that way. Judge Triana Doyal could very easily drop me a note, or give me a call...IF she wanted to...
So could Bryan Stodgehill, or the Portland Cancer Society....
But, funny, they don't...
What does that aching dark silence from her, the Cancer society, the Victorville DA's office tell YOU?
"Snoopy" posted:
"all he [Baggett] and the other two document examiner were asked to do was to compare the Pallasart Invoice to the Bob Atchison document and see if the two were the same"
So Baggett operated on his own initiative when he went further than saying whether the documents were the same and opined that Bob Atchison "committed fraud on the court"?
Well, that's helpful in preparing the lawsuit against him. (He must be getting just more and more ecstatic that he ever heard from you.)
And, here it is yet again, moron. No one is arguing there were not different versions of the invoice. The point is that all versions reflected the amount owing on the same underlying contract. The jury heard both your and Bob's sides of the argument about what the terms of that contract were and what was owing on it. They believed him and not you. The color, size, shape, header, font style, spacing, or thickness of different invoices sent at different times made no difference.
The controversy was about the nature of the contract, not the form on which the bills were sent.
O Mighty Grand Shovel,
I think I am in trouble! The large-jawed woman gave me some sort of pills that she had left over from what she called "a gig I had a few years ago". They were supposed to relieve the tension headache that I developed a few marslaks ago. The dwarves and I have been staking out this house in Austin for several days while the large-jawed woman hangs out at the Dunkin' Donuts. They have free wifi. Anyway, I took the pills and now . . . I don't know how to say this, Your Mary Tyler Mooreness, but I am a tripod! Seriously, the dwarves keep saying things like "Grower not a shower" and "Be careful where you point that thing, you're gonna put somebody's eye out".
What do I do, O Mighty Shovel?
Your faithful minion,
Illuminati
"Snoopy" posted:
"No there was more to it [Baggett's "evidence"] but why disclose it on the web?"
And why disclose even the first bit of it on the web?
And whether Baggett sent you anything more or not is of no consequence.
You see, Hamou, he is a fraud. (You shouldn't have too much trouble understanding that.)
He does not have the training he says he has. He did not study under the recognized expert he claims he did. He is not court certified as he holds himself out to be. Given what's now in trial records and appellate records regarding his having to retract claims he made under oath, no court would even allow the introduction of any "evidence" from him at this point once these issues were raised.
You went to a con artist, and you got conned.
Dimbulb.
Michele Biernat posted:
"they were trying to make some mountain out of a molehill"
Really neither mountain nor molehill. Call it symmetry.
You posted that you were telling acquaintances on history forums that they shouldn't buy Greg King and Penny Wilson's new book as Penny Wilson no longer shares either your sympathy for Oma Hamou or your enmity for Rob Moshein.
Really, Biernat. Why add hypocrisy to your list of unsettling traits?
Actually, now that I think of it, hypocrisy is already on the list.
What else is working as an advocate for cancer victims while supporting a woman who runs cancer scams for money?
Sorry for the scattered posts. Just doing a little multi-tasking here.
I don't think we've heard from you, Biernat, since Hamou obtained that "evidence" from her "expert document examiner".
Were you as impressed with his credentials as she was?
"Snoopy" posted:
"the Refai person took Oma for her cancer treatments at the hospital, as her friend helped her out to his car because she was that sick, weak to walk"
And she reciprocated this "friendship" how?
By producing her fellow con artist Jim Sproul to sign the promissory note Mr. Refai required before making what he thought was a loan.
By forcing Mr. Refai to retain an attorney and sue in order to try to get the promissory note honored.
By she and Sproul failing to appear for trial, even though both were served process.
By ignoring the judgment.
By calling Refai's attorney supposedly to try to resolve the matter -- but only after we posted on the internet we had talked to him and gotten more details about the case -- and then hanging up abruptly when he asked her for a call back phone number.
Besides, Hamou -- we've seen the pictures of you leaving the courthouse in San Bernardino. Who gains weight from cancer treatments?
Also, just how was this "friendship" with Refai struck up? It seems to have been something he didn't want his wife to find out about, at least until he had no choice.
Boy, you must be some conversationalist (all the evidence of your writing skills to the contrary).
And Biernat. Why would we call the Oregon Attorney General? No one (at least none of us here) has accused you of any crime. Just of being stone stupid and hypocritical.
In fact, when the ACS saw Hamou's list of aliases, her felony history, the social security numbers she has "borrowed", her incredibly long list of civil judgments, and the information from Thomas Ward, there was concern that she might be able to acquire personal information on Portland donors.
I hastened to tell them I seriously doubted you had any criminal intent in supporting Hamou's scams, and you weren't likely to be a conduit of that kind of information back to her. You were just so obsessed with being booted off a history forum that you would align yourself with anyone and anything that seemed to scratch your itch for revenge at having been embarrassed there.
Oh, and I see "Snoopy" is still referring to Judge Gisela Triana-Doyal on the "Ask Oma" forum as Gissela Triana-Doyle, hoping she can post her nonsense about being deprived of a fair trial by Judge Triana-Doyal without the judge actually coming across her forum.
What kind of dolt would show up on a scheduled trial date without any of her "key documents", if they actually existed? Especially after having already had three continuances and knowing courts get impatient with such shenanigans after a point.
I kinda have a new hobby -- checking out Curt Baggett, Hamou's "expert document examiner".
According to Baggett's website, where he banners himself as the Nation's #1 Expert, Baggett says he is "court qualified and certified by" the American Bureau of Document Examiners.
But here's the problem. There is no such organization. Every search engine result (and there are dozens) for that organization comes back to -- guess where! -- Baggett's own website.
Now, there are a few legitimate professional organizations for forensic document examiners with similar names.
But here's the problem. Baggett is not listed as a member of a single one of them.
Baggett also says he is "court qualified and certified by" the American Institute of Applied Science.
Now that's a very impressive sounding place. However, it's a study-at-home school that gives mail order diplomas. And it does not have the authority to "court qualify" anyone for anything. Only a court may grant recognition as a court-qualified expert.
This sounds remarkably like Oma Hamou's claims that she is a professional actress. But one without a single credit listed on IMDB, IBDB, or any other industry database.
In fact, despite her claims, nothing reflecting any professional accomplishments of any sort for her can be found anywhere except on her own websites where, or course, she is quite famous, remarkably accomplished, stunningly beautiful, and a real mover and shaker.
Hamou and Baggett. Birds of a feather, it would seem.
But darling Blakele, that's wonderful. I hate to think of darling Omele being all alone, and now she will have someone with whom she can speak professionally, so to speak!
Darling Russophile Lady, if I understand you correctly, darling, your argument is that your work for the ACS is too unimportant for them to be concerned with your friendship with a convicted grifter? Darling, that may be true, and how modest of you to admit it, darling, but I don't think you quite got what Blake was talking about (he's so smart, darling, and you're so not, so it's understandable!) when he brought your association with Hamou up, darling. It's not criminal, silly, it's just stupid for someone to hang out with her. But of course she does pray for your boys, darling, and of course that means a lot. And I'm sure G-d listens, darling, once He stops laughing at a woman who has spent her life conning people praying, darling. On the other hand, He must get a lot of prayers about Oma Hamou headed His way from people like the darling Batchelors, Cowans, Refais, Mortons, etc.; I know the Kedems have sent a few petitions His way, darling.
But I am glad to see that you care for darling Omele, darling! I do too! It's like a bond we share!!!
Caring so much, darling. Caring so much!
Mitzi Kedem
"Snoopy" posted:
"Anyone else notice how Bob & All glosses over the fact Bob and his attorney committed perjury at trial, that Bob committed the crime of forgery and he stole in excess of $10,000 from Oma/Enigma"
No one here is glossing over anything.
Including the fact that you either argued before the jury that the documents were not original, that the wrong party was being sued, and that you did not owe the money -- or you were abysmally stupid for believing these things and not arguing them before the jury.
And if, in fact, you had the "real" documents back in a box in your hotel room and were forced to trial without a chance to prepare adequately, all you had to do was file an appeal or request a new trial.
You failed to do so.
Also, how can you complain that Bob sued personally for a debt owed to PallasArt and at the same time in the above post argue that Bob stole money from "Oma/Enigma"?
How can you be both a company and an individual for the purpose of conducting business but Bob cannot be?
It's this kind of screwed up logic that causes you to miss the whole point of the jury verdict: they heard the arguments you've been repeating on the internet for years as if they were something new; they felt that Bob had the right to sue for a debt owed to PallasArt; they believed you and he had a contract the terms of which you did not fulfill; and they did not care whether successive copies of invoices were printed on different letterhead.
If that magic box back in your hotel room really had anything in it that would have turned the case around, you would have appealed or asked for a new trial.
As there was nothing in that box that would have shown the jury anything they had not heard at trial, you knew an appeal or request for a new trial was fruitless.
Instead, you decided to retry the case on the internet, where pesky things such as civil procedure, rules of evidence, and exposure to cross examination under oath would not cramp your style.
It's classic con artist behavior.
Kind of like Curt Baggett making absurd claims on the internet about his credentials that would never stand up in court (and, in fact, haven't).
Birds of a feather.
"Anyone else notice how Bob & All glosses over the fact Bob and his attorney committed perjury at trial, that Bob committed the crime of forgery and he stole in excess of $10,000 from Oma/Enigma"
So, where is the complaint filed with the State Bar of Texas?
So, where is the Motion for Perjury timely filed with the Court?
Where is the Police Report made in a timely fashion with the Austin Police Dept for Felony Theft?
In the same magic box, no doubt, with all the other imaginary documents that Oma claims to have but nobody ever sees...
Dear BFF,
I'm hurt! I haven't paid much attention to either board since yesterday morning, and what do I read when I sign on but "obsessed psychopath"??? Girlfriend, what up? Here I was all set to wish you a Happy New Year! I will anyway, just because!
Back to that exciting life that keeps me so busy --- you understand how it is, BFF!
RJ
I don't think you're obsessed, Becks.
Well, with clothes maybe. You are one sharp dresser.
She actually has really good taste, Blake. Rebecca sent us some pictures from the trip to Prague and Vienna, and I have to tell you, she wears clothes well. There was a Ralph Lauren suit and coat combo that I particularly covet, but with my coloring I can't wear red.
It was nice to see some color. All Nitzana will wear is a black pencil skirt and turtleneck, with her hair pulled severely back into a pony tail. She claims it makes her look "smart".
Bitsy
"Snoopy" posted:
"Had the trial Judge seen the first page of Pallasart's Settlement fax it would have tossed Bob's case to curb – as it named the wrong plaintiff and the wrong defendant."
So why, then, didn't you appeal the judgment or ask for a new trial?
It's obvious you want to try your cases on the internet, where you can claim you have all kinds of documents that never seem to be available in the courtroom, where you can claim that everyone who wins against you (Refai, Cowan, Atchison, etc.) committed perjury, where you can say process servers lied to the court when they said you were served, where you can say anything you want without being subjected to cross examination.
That is, of course, why this blog drives you bonkers. It is a form of cross examination where your specious claims are tested and challenged, and there's not a damn thing you can do about it. A prime example was your posting on the internet of that ludicrous "document examination" by that hack Curt Baggett. If he were to make his claims in a courtroom about his credentials, he would be eaten alive by any competent cross examination.
You have made a point not to appeal, not to serve process on time, not to show up in court when you have been summoned.
Consequently, you have yet to prove a single thing you have claimed for years on the internet about Bob Atchison. Or Huiku Batchelor. Or Hamid Refai. Or Eric Cowan. Or any of the other large number of people who have sued you or had you prosecuted.
And I think all of them have actually won judgments, to say nothing of Amex, Elsevier, etc.
But the internet is so much more fun, Blake.
Thanks for the compliment, Bitsy, and you too, Blake. I do try!
RJ
Hmmmm.
Ever notice how "Snoopy" NEVER answers the question about why there was no appeal or request for new trial filed after Bob Atchison won his verdict against her?
Despite all the "proof" she had in that magic box back at the hotel room.
Now "Snoopy" is saying "he" isn't going to answer because he wasn't the one sued, and he's saying Oma isn't going to answer because she won't deign to respond to the likes of Atchison or Moshein.
It's interesting that "Snoopy" divulges all kinds of details about Hamou's life and activities. But he won't answer the simple question of why she never appealed that verdict if she had proof of perjury and fraud on the part of Atchison and his lawyer.
Darling, isn't it obvious? She's in love with that Putin, such a mensch on that horse, if a little unpleasant with the poisoning of people and things like that. But face it, darling Omele's taste in the men! Oy, darling, I'm just going by what you've told us about darling Marcus and the nice man who was as a daddy to you when you got off the bus in Hollywood in your jimjams, and darling Hamid Refai who you hit up for money, and darling Don Morton who you robbed when he lost his faculties, and your own darling papa who according to darling Mike Newson was a little too free with the pats, and now darling Putin? Darling, you have a daddy fixation the size of the Negev, Omele, and to tell you the truth I'm also starting to worry about the horses, my little honey cake.
And Blakele, darling, I think you know why she didn't appeal and why she refuses to answer the question. She reminds me of my cousin Bina. When she was in fifth grade that snippy little Bea Rosenblatt won the composition prize, and Bina wasn't happy about it. First she claimed that the teacher was prejudiced, although that was kind of silly, since the teacher's name was Fanny Teitlebaum. I mean, I ask you. Then she claimed that Bina had copied the composition from somewhere else. She brought in all of these little pishers from the fourth grade who were supposed to testify to the principal that Bina had forged her composition! But then a darling boy named Benny was able to prove that the fourth graders had all failed English! Darling, was Mrs. Teitlebaum angry at Bea for wasting everyone's time! She put her in time-out for a long time, but Bea kept telling everyone what a forger Bina was! All because no one had ever given Bea the grade she deserved before!
The long and the short of it is that it is fifty years later, and we are still listening to Bea run off at that big yap of hers about "the composition that should have won", the "composition that Bina forged", and darling Bina has probably forgotten Bea ever existed!
Mitzele
Oh, Blake, you keep getting drawn into Oma's game...
She ALWAYS retreats to the "I'm not Oma" routine when she CAN NOT answer the question. Otherwise, she ALWAYS responds in the first person, even later in that same post as to what a Document Examiner will purportedly testify to (in Oma's Trial, not "snoopy's" of course.
You miss the bigger picture. Which is her intention of course (smoke and mirrors, distract the important stuff with the petty stuff...)
In her Motion to Retain, Oma Hamou was REQUIRED to explain to Judge Dietz WHY she never filed the legally required Appeal or MNT; further she was REQUIRED to explain to Judge Dietz WHY service of process did not issue for over a year in the Bill of Review and REQUIRED to explain to Judge Dietz why Service of Process was not served and returned to court as LEGALLY REQUIRED within 12 months.
Judge Dietz's personal Court Administrator was kind enough to allow me to personally READ the Motion to Retain Oma emailed over. Nowhere in the Motion did she EXPLAIN any of this to the COURT as REQUIRED.
So, why "should" she explain it to you when she can't even explain it to the COURT when LEGALLY REQUIRED? She can't, of course.
The rest is all smoke and mirrors, designed to deflect attention away from the reality and give her the platform to spew her lies, threats and baseless allegations.
Stick to the big picture Blake. Don't play her game about the minutae.
Oh and Oma, Texas Rule of Evidence 408: Evidence of any Settlement offers or negotiation regarding any matter in dispute are INADMISSABLE at trial. Period.
Oma Oma Oma...
I know who Warren is...He was at LUNCH the day I went to the office. One of the two WOMEN who were there was the one who showed me the Motion to Retain, and what reason would they have NOT to allow me to read it, it is a PUBLIC RECORD DOCUMENT. ALL filed trial documents are PUBLIC RECORDS OPEN TO ANYONE who wants to read them. duh.
so Oma. PUBLISH your motion to retain and PROVE you were able to explain all that to the Judge. Go on. You HAVE your copy. Publish it.
You won't of course. Your ego prevents you from proving what a malicious liar you are.
Three people I know have read your sites, and mine in the last week or so. Every one of them, unprompted by me said the same thing "This woman does Satan's work. She is evil". THREE separate opinions from uninvolved parties.
Not to mention the ones you contacted last year who all call you CRAZY. AND the Court Clerk's office who is sick and tired of hearing from you. He let that slip to me one day when I was there. Go on, prove my point by calling HIM TOO yet again.
Illuminati, have you gotten those tickets for Portland yet?
And, yes, I'll spot you for the new walking shoes, as long as this pair don't have fur and blinkers on them. You stand out enough as it is.
Just remember, though. You're flying cargo. Pack accordingly.
Oma, dear,
Rob can't accept service for Bob, girlfriend. As much time as you've spent dodging service in your crooked life, why don't you know this?
The latest barrage of nonsense she has posted defies all credulity: everyone has lied about Oma, everybody, everyone with whom she has ever dealt, lawyers, judges, D.A.s, landlords, ex-husbands, it's amazing to think that she inspires this kind of hatred in people. Why would that be, do you suppose, Oma? Hmm?
Also, "You go, girl"? "Snoopy", "Snoopy", "Snoopy". Speaking of girls . . .
And Blake and Rob are right. Why don't you ever answer the simple question why you didn't pursue this at the time, dear? Because you knew that you had and have no evidence? Because you had failed to persuade the nice judge that you weren't lying?
Also, I am still curious as to why you stole the poor boy's identity, i.e. "Justin Edwards of the American Film Institute". Your former lackey is now happily resettled in Honolulu, and we both know that wasn't his name. Was the "Justin" indentity just sitting there waiting to be stolen?
Oma Hamou: Crook. Grifter. Liar. Failure. Oma, 50 is just over the hill. Don't you want to try to amount to something before it's too late?
Rebecca
Sorry Oma. Once again you try to distract the main point ie: WHY you failed to explain to Judge Dietz WHY you did NOTHING on the Bill of Review for 12 months and WHY you failed to have citation issued for over a year and WHY service of Citation has not been made and returned within the required 12 months, PLUS you failed to explain to Judge Dietz WHY you failed to Appeal or move for a new Trial ALL OF WHICH AS REQUIRED BY THE LAW TO BE ENTITLED TO A BILL OF REVIEW...
Sorry but you can't twist reality to suit yourself. I can neither accept or refuse Service of Process as the Service must be made personally on Bob. All I did was remind the Postal Carrier that nobody at 101 Laurel will EVER accept mail from the psychopathic Handmaiden of Satan, Oma Hamou and told him that the envelope from her, with the contents unknown to me was to be refused. I still to this day have no clue what was in the envelope and frankly that doesn't matter.
Still waiting for you to explain WHY your Motion to Retain, which I did read regardless of what you may think, failed utterly to explain the above to Judge Dietz...
Also, Oma Hamou is over 47 and will be 48 soon...That is "on deck" for FIFTY in anybody's book...
I received an email asking me to post this song for Ms. Hamou, a song which I am told will remind her of her times in jail ........
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k66epna2Sss
orry Oma. Once again you try to distract the main point ie: WHY you failed to explain to Judge Dietz WHY you did NOTHING on the Bill of Review for 12 months and WHY you failed to have citation issued for over a year and WHY service of Citation has not been made and returned within the required 12 months, PLUS you failed to explain to Judge Dietz WHY you failed to Appeal or move for a new Trial ALL OF WHICH AS REQUIRED BY THE LAW TO BE ENTITLED TO A BILL OF REVIEW...
I notice you have not denied this, merely pretend I never read it, while I did in fact read it. Warren was very much not there, but on his lunch, so he would have no way to know about my being there or not. The VERY NICE lady I spoke with said she worked directly with Judge Dietz on his calendar.
How does one know that Oma Hamou knows she is failing utterly yet again? because she indulges in her self pity party of sending herself "music"....
Oh and remember all the times Oma Hamou said Greg and Penny "hate" me? Just last night he publicly posted:
along with other people here noted in the acknowledgements I do want to say a big public thank you to Rob, who went above and beyond to help out this book, especially at a time when he had many other issues with which to deal.
Speaking of Greg King, I just heard from several people telling me that Michele Biernat got spanked pretty good (verbally) by Greg for her bashing of me and Bob on their site. Heard that verbiage is now forbidden on their website.
Boy, I wonder how many welcome mats that one has worn out in her time.
Well, it makes it easier to understand why she finds Hamou such comforting company.
I mentioned to my friends on the K&W site what the dimwit co-conspirator in Fraud Biernat had to say:
"Actually Moshein, he was MORE upset that I'm reading The Court of the Last tsar and not the new book than my "bashing" of you. But hey, keep living in that dream world of yours."
SO, here is EXACTLY what was said on TO BIERNAT SPECIFICALLY BY GREG KING, AND OTHERS:
Greg King:"Since this is a place Penny and myself created, and since we've made peace with Bob and Rob, I would ask that people NOT air past differences or use this as a place to rehash anything (I don't mean you Liz-just in general I'd RATHER not see it-this was one of the reasons we stopped the forum
because I had to spend several hours a night editing posts).
Hmmm, I don't see a mention of "Court of the Last Tsar" anywhere. Do you?
then two more added their thoughts about BIERNAT:
AGR Bear, after Greg asked that Russophile cease and desist:
“Enough!
Greg has asked us not to rehash what's past.”
__________________
From Michael:
“I agree with Bear wholeheartedly ENOUGH of Oma & the Rob/Bob issue.
We want this forum to stay clear of that and as a wise old aunt of mine said "it is time to charge that account to the dust and let the rain settle it."
Hmmm, STILL no mention of Court of the Last Tsar???
Wake up and realize who lives in a dream world Biernat...It isn't me.
I'll let you think otherwise Buddy. :wink:
ummm, dimwit Oma, who can't READ the K&W site because Greg wont ALLOW her in...
ONLY BIERNAT the FELON LOVER was trashing me and Bob and mentioning you. NOBODY ELSE. In fact, she had been asked before by other users to stop and Greg had to step in and TELL HER to stop.
Which you would have known, if you could get in there, but Greg won't allow you in.
Good grief. Who blew "Snoopy's" fuse?
Can I just go on record as hating carousel horses? They have always just creeped me out.
So there is some kind of fight going on with my BFF on another internet board?
BFF, you get around! How was the meeting, by the way? Any people secretly photographing you?
I'll tell you what I did notice when I read the posts from "Alexandra" that you so kindly put up on your forum, Oma. You have never been able to differentiate between "your" and "you're", either as "Alexandra" or "Snoopy". Of course, when you used the name "Alexandra" you were just pretending to be Russian Orthodox, while when you use the name "Snoopy" you are pretending to be a college graduate named "Justin Edwards" who is affiliated with the "American Film Institute". Oma, a college graduate would be able to distinguish the correct usage. I'm sure there were sterling English teachers in Albion, Michigan and whatever neck of West Virginia you wandered in from, girlfriend, but you are letting the side down.
RJ
OK peeps... new
Posted by: pennywilson (IP Logged)
Date: August 04, 2007 01:09PM
2.Oma Hamou. We're not going there on this forum. At all. Ever. My foot is down. I don't know anything about the case, except that she hates Rob and Bob, and Bob and Rob hate her. I have never knowingly been involved in any of their shit, though I know my name has been batted around by both sides. I will not be drawn into their drama or their lawsuit, and so this is another topic that we will not discuss or reference here -- believe me, this is not a spider-web in which any of us want to be entangled. It's an energy-suck, it's a brain-drain, it's a side-show.
From: Greg King
Subject: Re: Oma Hamou is in your forum
Date: November 29, 2007 2:07:09 AM CST
To: Rob Moshein
As of today the forum should be locked and no one will be able to post as
I'm too busy with my newest book and now my next book to keep up, so this
shouldn't be a problem.
G
No, NO, NO! Illuminati, you fool!
I told you to look for a woman who thought she looked like Ava Gardner at that race, not someone who looked like an aphid gardener.
What in the hell do you expect me to do with photos of some old woman waddling around with knee pads, a floral shirt, and a big straw hat?
And why are there palm trees in the background? I didn't know there were any palm trees in Portland.
Post a Comment