I want to make certain readers understand my point of this blog. For years now, Oma Hamou, [who now uses the aka names of Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Murphy, and in years past aka names known to Law Enforcement of Oma McConnell, Oma Demian, Oma Chedid, Oma Ashkenazy, Rebecca Jordan and Jordan Taylor] has made it her life's work to plaster the internet with libel, slander and defamation about me. You can read in previous blogs, for yourself, how she admits that this is her goal.
As there is little Law Enforcement can do to assist me at this time, I can only defend myself here. If Oma Hamou and whatever cronies she may have had just left me alone, there would not have been a need for this blog.
Credibility, as she said, is the key. So judge the woman accusing me for her credibility:
She has THREE felony convictions for fraud, she wrote bad checks.
She was arrested three times as a FELONY FUGITIVE FROM JUSTICE for failing to live up to the terms of her probation for those felonies.
She is CURRENTLY facing trial for FELONY FORGERY Case FVI802540 Defendant 3045972 MCCONNELL, ALEXANDRA OMA in San Bernardino County. Detail are in the most recently previous blog or you can go here http://www.sbcounty.gov/courts/genInfo/openaccess.htm
and read the entire minute orders for the hearings to date on this Felony Crime Charge, as recently as yesterday.
Oma Hamou aka Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Murphy et al has spent about an entire YEAR of her life sitting in jail over the course of her life. Most recently in Victorville California for some six weeks in last November and December. Ask her how she enjoyed her 2008 Thanksgiving Dinner in jail.
This woman has accumulated debt on the public record of nearly one million dollars. This public information is out on the internet and easily found.
This woman lies. Just last night she said that her attorney told her I had spoken to the DA prosecuting her felony Forgery charge and she "knew all about it". This was a bald faced lie. I have never spoken to the DA.
She says "law enforcement" have "told her" things about me. These statements are a bald faced and deliberate lie. I can go on an on, you can read all the previous blog posts I have put up if you want the details.
Now this woman through her old boyfriend Jim Sproul of Northridge California (who by his own admission has given Oma Hamou aka Alexandra McConnell et al OVER ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS AS A GIFT. ARE YOU LISTENING INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE??) now says
"TRUTH
According to the San Bernadino's District Attorney's office Oma Hamou is not on trial for felony forgery."
HERE IS THE TRUTH, STRAIGHT FROM THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY COURT, YOU CAN SEE THAT OMA HAMOU'S STATEMENT SHE IS NOT ON TRIAL FOR FELONY FORGERY IS A BALD FACED AND DELIBERATE LIE MEANT ONLY TO DECEIVE:
Case FVI802540 - Defendants
Seq Defendant Next Court Date Status Agency /
DR Number Arrest Date Count 1 Charge Violation Date
1 MCCONNELL, ALEXANDRA OMA PRE-PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE
07/28/2009 AT 8:30 AM DEPT. V6 ACTIVE SH
070805054 11/07/2008 PC 476 11/07/2008
- Status
Custody Bail
Filing Type Complaint Filing Date 12/02/2008
Ordered Bail $0.00 Posted Bail $0.00
D.A. BRYAN STODGHILL Defense BRIAN WATSON-RETAINED
Next Action: PRE-PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE
07/28/2009 AT 8:30 AM DEPT. V6 Deputy Report #: SH-04 070805054
Warrant Type Status Issued Affidavit
NONE N/A N/A
Probation Type Granted Expiration
N/A N/A N/A
Sentence Convicted Date County Jail CTS
N/A N/A N/A
State Prison Max Sentence
N/A N/A
Fine and Penalty Restitution Fine Restitution to Victim
0 N/A
- Charges
Arrest Charges
Count Charge Severity Description Violation Date Plea Status
1 PC 476 F MAKING, POSSESSING, UTTERING FICTIOUS INSTRS 11/07/2008
Filed Charges
Count Charge Severity Description Violation Date Plea Status
1 PC 476 F MAKING, POSSESSING, UTTERING FICTIOUS INSTRS 11/07/2008 ACTIVE
- Probation
Probation Has Not Been Granted On This Case For This Defendant.
- Related Cases On Calendar
Related Cases On Calendar
This Defendant Does Not Have Any Other Cases With Future Hearings Scheduled.
- All Defendant's Cases
Case Number Filed Date Charges Next Hearing Jurisdiction
This Defendant Does Not Have Any Other Reportable Cases.
- Actions and Minutes
Action Date Action Text Disposition Hearing Type
07/30/2009 9:00 AM DEPT. V6 PRELIMINARY HEARING ACTIVE
07/28/2009 8:30 AM DEPT. V6 PRE-PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE ACTIVE TRC
07/16/2009 9:00 AM DEPT. V6 PRELIMINARY HEARING VACATED
07/14/2009 8:30 AM DEPT. V6 PRE-PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE DISPOSED TRC
Minutes
LARRY W ALLEN
CLERK: LF-LORI FLORES
CERTIFIED COURT REPORTER: BR-BARBIE ROELLE CSR# BR-5376
DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY BRYAN STODGHILL PRESENT.
ATTORNEY BRIAN WATSON-RETAINED PRESENT.
DEFENDANT PRESENT.
-
PROCEEDINGS
ACTION CAME ON FOR PRE-PRELIMINARY HEARING
-
DEFENSE MOTION TO CONTINUE IS GRANTED.
-
HEARINGS
PRELIMINARY HEARING SET ON 07/16/2009 VACATED.
PRE-PRELIMINARY HEARING SET FOR 07/28/2009 AT 8:30 IN DEPARTMENT V6.
PRELIMINARY HEARING SET ON 07/30/2009 AT 9:00 IN DEPARTMENT V6.
DEFENDANT ORDERED TO APPEAR ON HEARING DATE.
-
TIME WAIVERS
TIME WAIVER PREVIOUSLY GIVEN.
-
CUSTODY STATUS
CURRENT BAIL BOND CONTINUED.
CASE CUSTODY - BAIL BOND
============= MINUTE ORDER END ================
06/11/2009 9:00 AM DEPT. V6 PRELIMINARY HEARING DISPOSED
Minutes
JOHN M TOMBERLIN
CLERK: LF-LORI FLORES
CERTIFIED COURT REPORTER: FM-FRANCES MACIAS CSR# FM-10918
DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY CECILIA JOO PRESENT.
DEPUTY PUBLIC DEFENDER 9 PRESENT
ATTORNEY BRIAN WATSON-RETAINED PRESENT.
DEFENDANT PRESENT.
-
PROCEEDINGS
ACTION CAME ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
-
STIPULATED MOTION TO CONTINUE IS GRANTED.
-
HEARINGS
PRE-PRELIMINARY HEARING SET FOR 07/14/2009 AT 8:30 IN DEPARTMENT V6.
PRELIMINARY HEARING SET ON 07/16/2009 AT 9:00 IN DEPARTMENT V6.
DEFENDANT ORDERED TO APPEAR ON HEARING DATE.
-
TIME WAIVERS
DEFENDANT WAIVES HIS/HER RIGHT TO A PRELIMINARY HEARING WITHIN 10 COURT DAYS AND 60 CALENDAR DAYS UNDER PC859B AND 60 DAYS BEYOND 07/16/2009.
-
CUSTODY STATUS
CURRENT BAIL BOND CONTINUED.
CASE CUSTODY - BAIL BOND
============= MINUTE ORDER END ================
06/09/2009 8:30 AM DEPT. V6 PRE-PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE DISPOSED TRC
Minutes
LARRY W ALLEN
CLERK: B6021-LINNEA RIVERA
CERTIFIED COURT REPORTER: CM-CHRISTIE MATHES CSR# CM-6221
DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY JASON WILKENSON PRESENT.
SPECIAL APPEARANCE BY ATTORNEY BRANDON WOOD FOR ATTORNEY BRIAN WATSON.
DEFENDANT PRESENT.
-
PROCEEDINGS
ACTION CAME ON FOR PRE-PRELIMINARY HEARING
-
PARTIES ANNOUNCE READY FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING.
-
HEARINGS
PRELIMINARY HEARING CONFIRMED.
(06/11/09)
ESTIMATED TIME IS 45 MINUTES.
DEFENDANT ORDERED TO APPEAR ON HEARING DATE.
-
CUSTODY STATUS
CASE CUSTODY - BAIL BOND
CURRENT BAIL BOND CONTINUED.
============= MINUTE ORDER END ================
05/13/2009 9:00 AM DEPT. V6 PRELIMINARY HEARING DISPOSED
Minutes
LARRY W ALLEN
CLERK: LF-LORI FLORES
CERTIFIED COURT REPORTER: CM-CHRISTIE MATHES CSR# CM-6221
DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY BRYAN STODGHILL PRESENT.
ATTORNEY BRIAN WATSON-RETAINED PRESENT.
DEFENDANT PRESENT.
-
PROCEEDINGS
ACTION CAME ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
-
STIPULATED MOTION TO CONTINUE IS GRANTED.
-
HEARINGS
PRE-PRELIMINARY HEARING SET FOR 06/09/2009 AT 8:30 IN DEPARTMENT V6.
PRELIMINARY HEARING SET ON 06/11/2009 AT 9:00 IN DEPARTMENT V6.
DEFENDANT ORDERED TO APPEAR ON HEARING DATE.
-
TIME WAIVERS
DEFENDANT WAIVES HIS/HER RIGHT TO A PRELIMINARY HEARING WITHIN 10 COURT DAYS AND 60 CALENDAR DAYS UNDER PC859B AND 60 DAYS BEYOND 06/11/2009.
-
CUSTODY STATUS
CURRENT BAIL BOND CONTINUED.
CASE CUSTODY - BAIL BOND
============= MINUTE ORDER END ================
05/11/2009 8:30 AM DEPT. V6 PRE-PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE DISPOSED TRC
Minutes
LARRY W ALLEN
CLERK: JL-JACKIE LAWRENCE
CERTIFIED COURT REPORTER: CM-CHRISTIE MATHES CSR# CM-6221
DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY JAMES HILL PRESENT.
ATTORNEY BRIAN WATSON RETAINED.
DEFENDANT PRESENT.
-
PROCEEDINGS
ACTION CAME ON FOR PRE-PRELIMINARY HEARING
-
OFF RECORD, COURT AND COUNSEL CONFER IN CHAMBERS
-
PARTIES ANNOUNCE READY FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING.
-
HEARINGS
PRELIMINARY HEARING CONFIRMED.
FOR 05/13/09
ESTIMATED TIME IS ONE HOUR 30 MINUTES.
DEFENDANT ORDERED TO APPEAR ON HEARING DATE.
-
CUSTODY STATUS
CASE CUSTODY - BAIL BOND
============= MINUTE ORDER END ================
04/30/2009 9:00 AM DEPT. V6 PRELIMINARY HEARING VACATED
04/28/2009 8:30 AM DEPT. V6 PRE-PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE DISPOSED TRC
Minutes
LARRY W ALLEN
CLERK: LF-LORI FLORES
CERTIFIED COURT REPORTER: CM-CHRISTIE MATHES CSR# CM-6221
DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY CECILIA JOO PRESENT.
ATTORNEY BRIAN WATSON - RETAINED PRESENT.
DEFENDANT PRESENT.
-
PROCEEDINGS
ACTION CAME ON FOR PRE-PRELIMINARY HEARING
-
PEOPLES MOTION TO CONTINUE IS GRANTED.
-
HEARINGS
PRELIMINARY HEARING SET ON 04/30/2009 VACATED.
PRE-PRELIMINARY HEARING SET FOR 05/11/2009 AT 8:30 IN DEPARTMENT V6.
PRELIMINARY HEARING SET ON 05/13/2009 AT 9:00 IN DEPARTMENT V6.
DEFENDANT ORDERED TO APPEAR ON HEARING DATE.
-
TIME WAIVERS
TIME WAIVER PREVIOUSLY GIVEN.
-
CUSTODY STATUS
CURRENT BAIL BOND CONTINUED.
CASE CUSTODY - BAIL BOND
============= MINUTE ORDER END ================
02/26/2009 9:00 AM DEPT. V6 PRELIMINARY HEARING DISPOSED
Minutes
LARRY W ALLEN
CLERK: LF-LORI FLORES
CERTIFIED COURT REPORTER: CM-CHRISTIE MATHES CSR# CM-6221
DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY CARRIE HALGRIMSON PRESENT.
ATTORNEY BRIAN WATSON PRESENT.
DEFENDANT PRESENT.
-
PROCEEDINGS
ACTION CAME ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
-
PEOPLES MOTION TO CONTINUE (FURTHER INVESTIGATION) IS GRANTED.
-
HEARINGS
PRE-PRELIMINARY HEARING SET FOR 04/28/2009 AT 8:30 IN DEPARTMENT V6.
PRELIMINARY HEARING SET ON 04/30/2009 AT 9:00 IN DEPARTMENT V6.
DEFENDANT ORDERED TO APPEAR ON HEARING DATE.
-
TIME WAIVERS
DEFENDANT WAIVES HIS/HER RIGHT TO A PRELIMINARY HEARING WITHIN 10 COURT DAYS AND 60 CALENDAR DAYS UNDER PC859B AND 60 DAYS BEYOND 04/30/2009.
-
CUSTODY STATUS
CURRENT BAIL BOND CONTINUED.
CASE CUSTODY - BAIL BOND
============= MINUTE ORDER END ================
02/24/2009 8:30 AM DEPT. V6 PRE-PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE DISPOSED TRC
Minutes
LARRY W ALLEN
CLERK: SJ1-SHIRLEY JAUREGUI
CERTIFIED COURT REPORTER: CM-CHRISTIE MATHES CSR# CM-6221
DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY TIM HASKELL PRESENT.
ATTORNEY BRIAN WATSON PRESENT.
DEFENDANT PRESENT NOT IN CUSTODY.
-
PROCEEDINGS
ACTION CAME ON FOR PRE-PRELIMINARY HEARING
PARTIES ANNOUNCE READY FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING.
ADDITIONAL DISCOVERY GIVEN TO DEFENSE COUNSEL
-
HEARINGS
PRELIMINARY HEARING CONFIRMED.
SET ON 02/26/09
DEFENDANT ORDERED TO APPEAR ON HEARING DATE.
-
ESTIMATED TIME IS 2-1/2 HOURS.
-
CUSTODY STATUS
CASE CUSTODY - BAIL BOND
CURRENT BAIL BOND CONTINUED.
============= MINUTE ORDER END ================
01/26/2009 9:00 AM DEPT. V6 PRELIMINARY HEARING VACATED
01/21/2009 8:30 AM DEPT. V6 PRE-PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE DISPOSED TRC
Minutes
LARRY W ALLEN
CLERK: LAS-LUCY SCHNEIDER
CERTIFIED COURT REPORTER: CM-CHRISTIE MATHES CSR# CM-6221
DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY ROBIN HASS PRESENT.
ATTORNEY BRIAN WATSON PRESENT.
DEFENDANT PRESENT.
-
PROCEEDINGS
ACTION CAME ON FOR PRE-PRELIMINARY HEARING
PRELIMINARY HEARING SET ON 01/26/2009 VACATED.
-
HEARINGS
PRE-PRELIMINARY HEARING SET FOR 02/24/2009 AT 8:30 IN DEPARTMENT V6.
PRELIMINARY HEARING SET ON 02/26/2009 AT 9:00 IN DEPARTMENT V6.
DEFENDANT WAIVES HIS/HER RIGHT TO A PRELIMINARY HEARING WITHIN 10 COURT DAYS AND 60 CALENDAR DAYS UNDER PC859B AND 60 DAYS BEYOND 02/26/2009.
DEFENDANT ORDERED TO APPEAR ON HEARING DATE.
-
CUSTODY STATUS
CASE CUSTODY - BAIL BOND
-
DEF REQ CONT FOR ADDITIONAL INVESTIGATION
============= MINUTE ORDER END ================
12/18/2008 9:00 AM DEPT. V6 PRELIMINARY HEARING VACATED
12/16/2008 8:30 AM DEPT. V6 PRE-PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE DISPOSED TRC
Minutes
ANNEMARIE G PACE
CLERK: JL-JACKIE LAWRENCE
CERTIFIED COURT REPORTER: LH1-LEISHA HENDRIX CSR# LH1-11680
DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY ROBIN HASS PRESENT.
ATTORNEY BRIAN WATSON RETAINED.
DEFENDANT PRESENT IN CUSTODY.
-
PROCEEDINGS
ACTION CAME ON FOR PRE-PRELIMINARY HEARING
-
MOTIONS
PARTIES MOTION TO CONTINUE MATTER IS GRANTED.
-
HEARINGS
PRELIMINARY HEARING SET ON 12/18/2008 VACATED.
-
PRE-PRELIMINARY HEARING SET FOR 01/21/2009 AT 8:30 IN DEPARTMENT V6.
PRELIMINARY HEARING SET ON 01/26/2009 AT 9:00 IN DEPARTMENT V6.
DEFENDANT ORDERED TO APPEAR ON HEARING DATE.
-
TIME WAIVERS
DEFENDANT WAIVES HIS/HER RIGHT TO A PRELIMINARY HEARING WITHIN 10 COURT DAYS AND 60 CALENDAR DAYS UNDER PC859B AND 60 DAYS BEYOND 01/26/2009.
-
CUSTODY STATUS
CASE CUSTODY - IN CUSTODY
============= MINUTE ORDER END ================
12/15/2008 BOND PC3000779334 POSTED FOR 25000.00
12/11/2008 9:00 AM DEPT. V6 PRELIMINARY HEARING VACATED
12/09/2008 8:30 AM DEPT. V6 PRE-PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE DISPOSED TRC
Minutes
ANNEMARIE G PACE
CLERK: JL-JACKIE LAWRENCE
MINUTES UPDATED BY SDA-SHERYL ANDRADE
CERTIFIED COURT REPORTER: LH1-LEISHA HENDRIX CSR# LH1-11680
DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAVID FOY PRESENT.
ATTORNEY BRIAN WATSON PRESENT.
DEFENDANT PRESENT IN CUSTODY.
-
PROCEEDINGS
ACTION CAME ON FOR PRE-PRELIMINARY HEARING
OFF THE RECORD, COURT AND COUNSEL CONFER IN CHAMBERS
DEFENSES ORAL MOTION REQUESTING REDUCTION IN BAIL IS GRANTED.
-
DEFENSES ORAL MOTION REQUESTING A CONTINUANCE IS GRANTED.
PRELIMINARY HEARING SET ON 12/11/2008 VACATED.
-
HEARINGS
PRE-PRELIMINARY HEARING SET FOR 12/16/2008 AT 8:30 IN DEPARTMENT V6.
PRELIMINARY HEARING SET ON 12/18/2008 AT 9:00 IN DEPARTMENT V6.
DEFENDANT ORDERED TO APPEAR ON HEARING DATE.
-
CUSTODY STATUS
BAIL REDUCED TO $25000.00.
CASE CUSTODY - IN CUSTODY
COMMITMENT ISSUED (PENDING)
============= MINUTE ORDER END ================
12/03/2008 1:30 PM DEPT. V6A IN CUSTODY ARRAIGNMENT DISPOSED ARRAIGNMENT
Minutes
ANNEMARIE G PACE
CLERK: SDA-SHERYL ANDRADE
CERTIFIED COURT REPORTER: LH1-LEISHA HENDRIX CSR# LH1-11680
ATTORNEY BRIAN WATSON PRESENT.
DEFENDANT PRESENT IN CUSTODY.
-
PROCEEDINGS
ACTION CAME ON FOR ARRAIGNMENT
DEFENDANT ARRAIGNED.
DEFENDANT IS ADVISED OF CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY RIGHTS. (AS ATTACHED AND INCORPORATED)
-
PLEA INFORMATION
DEFENDANT PLEADS NOT GUILTY TO ALL COUNTS.
-
DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR RELEASE ON OWN RECOGNIZANCE IS DENIED.
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
-
ATTORNEY INFORMATION
ATTORNEY BRIAN WATSON RETAINED.
COPY OF COMPLAINT AND DISCOVERY GIVEN TO DEFENSE COUNSEL.
-
HEARINGS
PRE-PRELIMINARY HEARING SET FOR 12/09/2008 AT 8:30 IN DEPARTMENT V6.
AND BAIL/OR HEARING
PRELIMINARY HEARING SET ON 12/11/2008 AT 9:00 IN DEPARTMENT V6.
DEFENDANT ORDERED TO APPEAR ON HEARING DATE.
-
CUSTODY STATUS
CASE CUSTODY - IN CUSTODY
BAIL SET AT $1000000.00.
COMMITMENT ISSUED (PENDING)
ATTORNEY NOTIFIED.
DISTRICT ATTORNEY NOTIFIED.
============= MINUTE ORDER END ================
12/02/2008 1:30 PM DEPT. V14 IN CUSTODY ARRAIGNMENT DISPOSED ARRAIGNMENT
Minutes
PATRICK L SINGER
CLERK: MC1-MARYANN CHAVEZ
-
PROCEEDINGS
ACTION CAME ON FOR ARRAIGNMENT
MOTIONS
ON COURT'S OWN MOTION-CASE OFF CALENDAR.
DEFENDANT REFUSED VIDEO ARRAIGNMENT
-
CUSTODY STATUS
CASE CUSTODY - IN CUSTODY
============= MINUTE ORDER END ================
12/02/2008 JURISDICTION SET TO VS BY OTS310.
12/02/2008 COMPLAINT FILED BY RSMIT
Yes, judge for yourself if this woman who wants to destroy my reputation in the public seems credible to you.
314 comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 201 – 314 of 314Original, I am orignal ;)
Rebecca you are pretending to know things...
Prove what? That Amex is owed 400K by "O"? Prove that she rustled credit cards? I don't have to prove it, "dude", Amex believes it. I contributed nothing of interest to their records other than the fact that "O" is currently facing trial for forgery, and I might have passed on her current address. As a professional courtesy, of course. But the files they have are pretty damning already. Nothing needed to be "proved" to them.
Oma, for God's sake, if you are going to invent another nom de plume, at least learn how to correctly spell it.
Gosh, I wonder if this is being posted from a Northridge IP.
and I just LOVE how "Justin" slipped up by forgetting how he was logged into Google, and posted as "ORIGINAL", then came back and DELETED them. BUT I have them.
This is EXACTLY what happened when "Larissa Feinstein" forgot which AOL account she was logged into and accidentally wrote from Sarskaia....hehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehe
What is the definition of stupidity/ To repeat the same mistake despite being corrected for it?
Rebecca you are a nut and neither you or Bob or Rob have substaniated on this blog or to anyone that I am Oma. Like I said Northridge is a great place to live. Wonderful people. Wonderful city. ;) Like I said Rebecca when I met with O's attorney Watson I am always happy to prove you motherfuckers and that is what you are are liars and have for years harassed and stalked and libel and slandered Oma.
That's it. :)
I did it on purpose Rob because I am catching you ;)
Gotcha!
Your not the only person whose a computer wiz dude, not by a long shot.
So "Justin" now you are saying Oma is going to claim that Bob and I are somehow responsible for Oma's current Felony Forgery charge???
Have you forgotten to take those anti-psychotic meds again? or are you smoking some crack?
Don't know what Larissa did don't care neither does anyone else in the real world.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
Ok the delusions are getting worse Oma. You're catching "me" how exactly.
Look down under this nice blue bordered white box ...
See the box that you can check that says follow up comments can be emailed to you?? Check that, and ALL comments go to your email, regardless if someone later deletes them...
So you have proven just what exactly? That I get email?? or that I can read English...
Dear, I really have never heard of a situation such as this. You have lost lawsuit after lawsuit after lawsuit. Yet it seems that in every one of them, you were in possession of documents that would surely have cinched the case in your favor if only you had made use of them.
Whatever was going on, dear child? Did your lawyers see these documents in a different light than you? Were you just too considerate of others to make use of the documents they provided you? Were you simply forgetful?
I have never in my life heard of a person losing so very many legal battles when all the weight of the evidence was on her side, dear.
Is our justice system really so broken that a defendant armed with so many rock solid defenses cannot prevail? If so, how you must fear that upcoming felony trial, dear.
My heart goes out to you.
So "Justin" now you are saying Oma is going to claim that Bob and I are somehow responsible for Oma's current Felony Forgery charge???
Have you forgotten to take those anti-psychotic meds again? or are you smoking some crack?
What the hell are you talking about Rob?
Rebecca Jordan said...
What is the definition of stupidity/ To repeat the same mistake despite being corrected for it?
No Rebecca,
The Definition of Stupidity is getting caught red handed in screwing up badly and pretending you "meant to do it all along"
"Gotcha" uh huh, right. You meant to slam your hand in the car door...
Oma, this AMEX stuff really has you freaked out.
You said so, in as many words "Justin"/Oma
Like I said Rebecca when I met with O's attorney Watson I am always happy to prove you motherfuckers and that is what you are are liars and have for years harassed and stalked and libel and slandered Oma.
Why ELSE would you be so "happy" to share this with her Criminal Defense Lawyer defending her on the FELONY FORGERY CHARGE??
Or is he branching out from Criminal Defense to new specialties just for you??
Penny,
I don't know what happened in that office with Oma perhaps dear you can contact Ryan Rogers her then attorney and ask him. But you won't because your not interested in the truth just online harassment.
O.k. Rob you asked why would I want to prove your a lying motherfucker. Because Rob you sent a letter to the DA and to Oma's attorney claiming I was Oma, I wanted him to know that what you wrote was a lie. I wrote the posts not Oma.
Next.
Dear, I doubt if it would do me any good to contact Mr. Rogers. Most attorneys will not discuss their clients' cases with non-parties.
Mr. Watson's willingness to discuss Oma/Justin's case with Justin/Oma is something of an exception. But, judging by the mispellings on his website, he is not quite a stickler for details.
Rob don't understand your logic, never have because I'm not a stalker.
You sent two letters to the DA and to Oma's attorney in those letters you wrote that Oma is posting on this blog as me.
I proved what you wrote about Oma being me was a LIE therefore your a liar.
Rob your wrong about the IP from 2004 or was it 2003 the IP provided was an IP assigned to Pallasart and either you or Bob using the name GILBERT MACDUFF posted Oma's social security number on the web.
This is a fact dude and one which was at the 2005 trial would've been used against Bob and will be used against him later before the year is up.
Penny,
Putting words in my mouth...
I met with the attorney because the asshole Rob stated in a letter to the DA and to Oma's attorney that she was posting on this blog. I offered my assistance just as Rob did in his letter, nothing more. ;)
While you came back and posted a shitty comment meant because you think online harassment is cool. But you didn't always think this way, did you;)
Not when it was happening to you...
Next
Hey, guys. Someone just hit the blog again from Mark D. Pastor's office.
Hi there, you!
And you dear Cad never proved I am not who I say I am.
Touche'
Oh dear, Justin/Oma. Did Mr. Watson call you on the carpet about your instigating and then participating in this blog?
I know the poor man cannot afford to read it himself, because he needs to keep himself uninformed on matters with which you do not acquaint him yourself. Otherwise, he would be under ethical obligations to disclose this information to the other side, which he surely understands would not work to your advantage regarding the felony forgery charge.
Of course, in this case, the District Attorney is getting the same information.
I just think the world gets along so much better when everybody has all the information, don't you?
Penny,
It is Bob and Rob who created blogs about Oma and published as you have republished lies about her. I and Mike and others are defending her against those lies.
That's all.;)
NORTHRIDGE IS A GREAT PLACE TO LIVE. Penny you live in Riverside?
Dipping deeper into the Amex file thewy sent me. Here's an interesting tidbit. Her lawyer in that case sued her for debt disclosure so that he could try and collect a fee. The gist of this is that she was broke, and living upon th3e kindness of others. Which means another old man is missing a checkbook, I suppose.
Eliahu is supporting her now, a check once a month like clockwork. We have no idea where the money is going, just that the kid sees none of it. Cat food, probably. You see why we're worried about Dromer?
My bad, I was skimming the material from Amex at Warp 8. It was actually the Amex lawyer who forced the debt disclosure, held in front of a judge. Sorry, I was reading and in a conference call at the same time.
Rebecca
Justin/Oma, this pretense that your good buddy Mike Newson is still hanging in there with you is kind of laughable, dude/chick.
Here's what Mike Newson wrote on June 24, 2004 in an e-mail to several people, including Justin/Oma:
"I am physically sick from all this, but Oma you are putting words in my mouth . . . .
"It seems that whatever I say gets sent out as a weapon. I told you that I received some messages from Bob that for all intents and purposes asked, was I really out of the picture as your webmaster, not all this. I did not say that the communications were in any way threatening.
"Defending you is one thing, become a weapon is another. I resigned verbally some days ago, and formalized it today in an eMail. It has got to the point that just seeing messages from any of you, puts me in the bathroom. This is no way to live . . . !
"I offer my apologies if and where they may be needed, and beg that I be left out of this, as my health can not handle any more of this."
Sorry, Oma/Justin. But this just doesn't sound like a man that is posting on your behalf or even having any association with you.
Not to worry, Beckele, a busy woman like you can make a mistake. It happens. I mean, look at the amount of kvatch that Oma hamou overlooked when she was running her production company. I don't mean to complain or anything, but the article Nitzi wrote? No check.
I know, can you believe it?
He runs into the bathr4oom? That's just like poor Justin's wife! I guess it's like a special power she has over people!
Blake,
Dude Mike Newson created 3 forums that includes the Tiki one. Guess that makes you a liar now doesn't it since he's been updating it with new material.
Lie to us some more baby!
So Mike Newson isn't real either? Are any of them real? Any of them?
We've been trying to tell you people, no. Why don't you listen?
Justin, unlimited breqadsticks soup and salad at the Garden, dude. Plus they've updated the rest of the menu! Dude, there's scampi! Why not take a break?
Don't do it, Justin! The last thing Omele needs are unlimited breadsticks!
The salad would be a good choice, though. Just a squeeze of lemon on it, though.
Look for the "your" when "you're" is called for, Rebecca dear. It's like her own very special Da Vinci code.
At first, I thought pointing this out to Justin/Oma would clue her in that she was leaving a trail of breadcrumbs right back to the gingerbread trailer.
But, alas, she just seems unable to grasp what a contraction is. So I guess the trail will stay fresh.
Penny you sure complained when you were a victim of online harassment ;)
I am not author like you or Simon and it doesn't matter how I spell or mispell things, who cares?
Not any one in the real world. Just the message is important. You published and republish lies and I am defending a friend, like at one time I defended you.
Justin,
I am a little confused. You say it doesn't matter how you spell? What kind of "great job" is it exactly that you have? Because the inability to spell is the least of your concerns. You go on paralogistical sprees, you have no idea how to conduct yourself in a professional situation, and you are pretty much reduced to the level of a sniggering frat boy when you post naked pictures of Your Friend which she herself has said she does not want put up on the internet.
So you can actually make a good living as a professional idiot? I'm not completely surprised. It does explain Ryan Seacrest. Are you really Ryan?
Rebecca
No one really cares how you spell, Oma dear. What's relevant here is what unfailingly repeated mistakes reveal about common identity.
I have seen no correspondence from you, Justin, Larissa, and your many other sock puppets that fail to get the contraction for "you are" wrong.
It simply boggles my mind that you cannot discipline yourself to correct this error.
Rebecca! Ryan Seacrest is a darling boy! It's that snotty Simon Cowell that gets on my last nerve.
I think that knocks out Larissa Feinstein as being real, Penelope. Our People can spell. It's a gift.
Oma:
Any more for us on the AMEX affair?
Im not Ryan Seacrest! And Im sure as hell not Simon Cowell! Im not Oma. Im me. Me!
Even if that is vrai, Justin Edouard, you're not Justin, either. I have told the real Justin to stay off this blog so as not to increase his stress level.
Lord no the "real" Justin Edwards is NO Ryan Seacrest or Simon Cowell for that matter.
A painfully thin kid, with greasy hair, and Goodwill clothes, who looked more likely that he'd panhandle a quarter off you was the REAL Justin that I saw in Court in Austin.
Lord even Stevie Wonder would never mistake that guy for Ryan Seacrest.
Mr. Moshein! As I mentioned to you yesterday, the real Justin is very concerned that you have not forgiven him for what happened, and I am afraid that your last post is going to hurt the self-esteem has has been painfully struggling to rebuild. I know that he was involved in actions that hurt you and your partner, but he has apologized. And he doesn't have lank, greasy hair anymore. He was so embarrassed when it started to fall out, possibly from stress, that he shaved his head. And at the time of the trial, his clothes probably were a bit shabby, but what can you expect? He had not been pqaid for some time.
Here are a bunch of emails sent to me by Oma pretending to be Larissa Feinstein.
Sound like anyone who has been posting here?
These are just a few of them.
On Monday, October 27, 2003, at 08:26 PM, Larissafeinstein@xxx.com
wrote:
Listen dude, do what you think you want to do, go for it! You should do this with every email that is sent to you defending Oma Hamou. Your a scum and I hope she wins her case!
You sent a letter to Jim and called him Oma also so go for it dude!
You think your so smart-
Larissa
***************************
From: Larissafeinstein@xxx.com
Date: October 27, 2003 8:36:35 PM CST
To: boba@pallasweb.com
Subject: Re: (no subject)
Again, my name is not Oma. Jim Sproul also wrote to you and told you that he was not Oma. It seems that you are a very paranoid person thinking that every email that you receive on Oma is from her, because no one could possibly write anything good about Oma Hamou.
Your a sick man!
Get some professional help!
Larissa
On Monday, October 27, 2003, at 08:26 PM, Larissafeinstein@xxx.com
wrote:
Listen dude, do what you think you want to do, go for it! You should do this with every email that is sent to you defending Oma Hamou. Your a scum and I hope she wins her case!
You sent a letter to Jim and called him Oma also so go for it dude!
You think your so smart-
Larissa
***************************
From: Larissafeinstein@xxx.com
Date: October 27, 2003 8:36:35 PM CST
To: boba@pallasweb.com
Subject: Re: (no subject)
Again, my name is not Oma. Jim Sproul also wrote to you and told you that he was not Oma. It seems that you are a very paranoid person thinking that every email that you receive on Oma is from her, because no one could possibly write anything good about Oma Hamou.
Your a sick man!
Get some professional help!
Larissa
On Monday, October 27, 2003, at From: Larissafeinstein@xxx.com
Date: October 27, 2003 8:43:58 PM CST
To: boba@pallasweb.com
Subject: Re: (no subject)
Listen dude, your really a sick man!
I am certain you know this!
Your obsessed with Oma Hamou and I hope she wins!
I guess that they were right about you, weren't they!
I have forwarded your emails on to Oma as has Mike, and Jim and every other person that you don't list. Your not so smart after all-
Larissa
************
From: Larissafeinstein@xxx.com
Date: October 27, 2003 8:56:45 PM CST
To: boba@pallasweb.com
Subject: (no subject)
Bob,
You really are confident that you are going to win your case against Oma don't you? You post silly things on your company's website and say basically that Oma Hamou and her company's have committed fraud and criminal conduct. You called the various governmental agencies and others and did this under false pretenses to destroy her and what she has accomplished.
Listen, she accomplished something that you haven't been able too. All you do is bully people and your letters to me I have forwarded them to Oma.
Larissa
From: Larissafeinstein@xxx.com
Date: October 27, 2003 8:59:48 PM CST
To: boba@pallasweb.com
Subject: Re: (no subject)
Are you gay?
***********
From: Larissafeinstein@xxx.com
Date: October 27, 2003 9:01:12 PM CST
To: boba@pallasweb.com
Subject: (no subject)
You write like a jealous she woman!
***********
From: Larissafeinstein@xxx.com
Date: October 27, 2003 9:05:11 PM CST
To: boba@pallasweb.com
Subject: Re: (no subject)
Why don't you ask Oma.
Send her an email at enigmafilms@aol.com as I don't know the answer to your question. Are you saying that her marriage has something to do with your lawsuit? I think that this is a sick obsession of yours and that you are so obsessed with Oma Hamou cause she did something that you weren't able to do didn't she!
************
On Monday, October 27, 2003, at 09:45 PM, Larissafeinstein@xxx.com
wrote:
Dear Mr. Atchison:
I just got off the phone to Oma who I have also forwarded your e-mails and mine to you. She has informed me that others have also done the same and ask me to tell you that if you have any questions concerning her to ask her attorney rather than third persons.
It is obvious to me and others who engage in any conversation with you that you are quite obsessed and crazy!
Larissa
I guess that they were right about you, weren't they!
I have forwarded your emails on to Oma as has Mike, and Jim and every
other person that you don't list. Your not so smart after all-
Larissa
From: Larissafeinstein@xxx.com
Date: October 28, 2003 3:12:11 PM CST
To: boba@pallasweb.com
Subject: (no subject)
Are you having fun?
*****************
From: Larissafeinstein@xxx.com
Date: October 28, 2003 3:34:16 PM CST
To: boba@pallasweb.com
Subject: (no subject)
Dear Mr. Atchison:
I wonder why you are so obsessed with Oma Hamou? You post on your company's website that she has basically committed crimes I guess you know this other wise you wouldn't have posted this.
******************
From: Larissafeinstein@xxx.com
Date: October 28, 2003 3:46:27 PM CST
To: boba@pallasweb.com
Subject: Re: (no subject)
Listen, I am not Oma!
Jim is not Oma!
Mike is not Oma!
Get a life!
And everyone else that writes to you defending Oma is NOT OMA!
You should listen to Mona, get a life!
*****************
From: Larissafeinstein@xxx.com
Date: October 28, 2003 3:54:50 PM CST
To: boba@pallasweb.com
Cc: ENIGMAFILMS@aol.com
Subject: Re: (no subject)
That's enough!
Send your emails directly to Oma Hamou and her attorney do not send any more emails to me. Your a fucking moron!
I am not Oma!
Jim is not Oma!
Mike is not Oma!
Asshole!
Larissa Feinstein
From: Larissafeinstein@xxx.com
Date: October 28, 2003 4:01:35 PM CST
To: dslater@xxx.com
Cc: boba@pallasweb.com, ENIGMAFILMS@aol.com
Subject: (no subject)
Dear Mr. Slater:
I called Oma and told her that I have been receiving many e-mails from Bob Atchison. This person is a sick man! He writes accusing me being Oma Hamou. Oma has told me that he has done with the others who have forwarded their emails to her.
This person is really creepy!
Larissa Feinstein
******************
On Wednesday, November 5, 2003, at 02:22 PM, Sarskaia@aol.com wrote:
Dear Bob:
I just spoke with Oma and I was told that you have stated in your new complaint that I am not real, Mona and others are simply not real
PEOPLE.
It shows your state of mind and helps Oma in her counter claim against you. I am real, so is Mona and so is Jim and so is Mike and the
others.
You know nothing about making films so your in for a real surprise-
As to her foundation you say that its a fraud a shell company -- all of these humiliating things you write and say are true only helps her case.
I have a right just as you do to tell you what I think of you. Your a control freak, a liar and a thief.
Larissa
*******************
On Wednesday, November 5, 2003, at 05:09 PM, Sarskaia@aol.com wrote:
And you will have a difficult time proving that I am not a real person. Like you will have a difficult time proving that Mona, Jim, Mike and others are not real.
Your right this is serious. You've made many mistakes, Mr. Atchison and you've accused Oma of crimes and have seriously damaged her reputation and her projects and foundation. It is serious. And you need to be stop!
Larissa Feinstein
From: Sarskaia@aol.com
Date: November 5, 2003 7:09:39 PM CST
To: boba@pallasweb.com
Subject: Re: (no subject)
I have been instructed to send your letter to Mr. Slater as well as not to write any more to you.
Larissa
*********************
On Nov 11, 2003, at 6:37 PM, Larissafeinstein@xxx.com wrote:
Dear Bob:
I spoke with Oma who asked me not to write to you because you have made my letters a part of your slander allegations against her. I write because I don't like what you have done to her and against her.
You have made innuendoes through your emails to me and others that we are Oma all in one, yet you do not know how foolish this makes you look, because Mona, Jim, Mike and others we are real people.
I know that you have been calling around searching for Oma to see where she is and she is afraid of you. Oma told me that her attorney asked you not too do this you continue. You really scare her and she has been receiving many threatening calls.
I read your letters to her and I guess you have made good on your mission to destroy her. I don't know what obsesses you to ruin a person or to hate as much as you do with her? I can't say that I do not know if she owes you money or not, but you've done horrible things to her throughout the years and what you did by exposing her the way that you have has made her really made her frightened.
I care as a friend for her and so do others.
Larissa
Penelope is right, Justin/Larissa/Oma. It would be a simple matter to clear up the misuse of "your". Why haven't you done it? Also, assuming that all of these people were real --- which of course they weren't --- those must have been some professional staff meetings at Sarskaia/Enigma back in the day.
"Have we done the fucking work on the fucking Alexander Palace, asshole?"
"Fuck, NO, Justin, not yet, ASSHOLE."
"Well your gonna be in a lot of trouble if you don't get off your FUCKING ASS, Larissa!"
I mean to say . . . who wouldn't have wanted to associate with such fine, upstanding capitalists?
Rebecca FUCKING Jordan
Also, "Larissa Feinstein"? Seriously? Seriously? What, were all of the cool names like "Rebecca Jordan" already taken?
"Dude" must have been the official cool word at Enigma Royal Films LLC and the Sarskaia Foundation.
Oma-Larissa-Justin use it a lot. Wow, it's almost like they could be the same person.
Bob, Bob Bob,
In court in the last litigation with Oma you couldn't prove Larissa was Oma just like you couldn't prove Mike was Oma or Jim was Oma or I was and so on. So Bob how about answering my questions. I didn't think you would because your a coward.
Touche'
no oma/Justin,
All we COULD prove about Larissa was that you, Oma, GAVE A FALSE ADDRESS UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY for one "Larissa Feinstein"...
I had the Motions prepared, actually, for the huge discovery failures like this, but you saved me the trouble by non-suiting. JUST like I had the Motion in my hand for Sanctions for your deliberate REFUSAL to attend my scheduled deposition of you, in violation of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. Remember you told me you were simply "too busy" to show up, even though you had been properly served and acknowledged service to me in writing...Courts don't like that....
I am not Oma.
You did not prove nothing in court about Larissa and that is a fact as you so stated. Larissa would've testify as I was prepared too and Mike and so forth.
hard for "Larissa" to testify since 1. you had a fake address for her. 2. She was never disclosed on the witness list provided and so the Court would deny any testimony and
Far MORE IMPORTANTLY SHE WASN"T THERE FOR THE TRIAL....I wonder "why" since she was so willing. Actually "Justin" YOU weren't there for the trial either, "Mike" wasn't there...actually none of you showed up to support Oma at trial...
WHY IS THAT?
WHY is it that "IF" all of these people were ready anxious to "testify" at the trial that NOBODY SHOWED UP?
Well?? I was THERE Oma, all day long. NOBODY ELSE SHOWED UP FOR OMA, EXCEPT THE REALLY SHODDY PRIVATE DETECTIVE YOU CLAIMED WAS YOUR "BODYGUARD"
WHERE WHERE WHERE WILL ALL THOSE WITNESSES, YOU NOW ASSERT WERE SO EAGER TO HELP AND SUPPORT YOU OMA???
NOBODY ELSE CAME BY ALL DAY LONG. YOU WERE ALONE AT TRIAL?
WHERE WAS JUSTIN?
WHERE WAS MIKE?
WHERE WAS MRS DAVIDSON?
WHERE WAS JIM SPROUL?
WHERE WAS LARISSA FEINSTEIN??
None of them came to help you out when you really needed them, did they?
NOPE. Not one. Not even "Justin Edwards" showed up....
You asked me Justin a question so here it is Rob: I wasn't there and neither was anyone else because we were told by the law firm of George Brothers that Oma would get a continuance for the trial. That didn't happen.
Where is Bob, come out, come out whereever you are;)
"You did not prove nothing in court about Larissa . . . ." (thus wrote Justin Edwards)
Oh, dear, here we go again with the double negatives.
Dear, instead of saying "you did not prove nothing" it really would be simpler to say "you proved something". Both phrases mean the same thing, you know, but one is viewed as standard English while the other is viewed as hillbilly talk.
And I have to agree with dear Mr. Moshein here. It is simply nonsense to say you had all sorts of people ready and willing to testify on your behalf yet you lost your case rather than put them on the stand.
This constant "I would have won if I had used all the documents I had and used all the witnesses at my disposal and told everything I know" is not serving you well. It does not make you look like a near-victor in court, dear. It makes you look like a blathering ninny.
Penny, penny, penny sigh!
That explains nothing "Justin". The continuance that bumbling fool tried to get was denied DAYS before the trial, remember? You guys had ALL WEEKEND to show up for Oma...
But you didn't.
Some friends. You all left her standing all high and dry when she stood trial.
Your "devotion" to Oma is obvious. You can sit behind a computer screen all day and type out vulgarities and slander, but when it came time to SHOW UP, well, you had better things to do...
Justin didn't come.
Mike didn't come.
"Larissa" didn't come.
"Mrs. Davidson" didn't come...
oh yeah, and the lawyers didn't come because OMA HAD NOT PAID THEM.
Penny,
How's that book coming along?
Rob what part did you not understand? I was told by an attorney that the trial would be continued and as such there would be no need to travel down there for nothing. I did come down to Ausitn when Oma was sick so did my wife and so did Mike Newson and others. We did this because we were concerned about our friend, Oma Hamou. You finally admit you remember what I looked like, thank you very much. I didn't think you notice given the fact you were sweating like a pig! ;)
I understand this much, "Justin"...
The continuance was denied on FRIDAY MORNING. You had all weekend AFTER being told the continuance was denied (because Judge Livingston was REALLY ticked off that Oma NEVER personally appeared at a single motion and her lawyer would not commit to represent her at trial) to get to Austin.
YOU KNEW DAYS IN ADVANCE THE TRIAL WAS GOING FORWARD.
"JUSTIN EDWARDS" DID NOT SHOW UP.
NOBODY SHOWED UP.
PERIOD.
THESE ARE FACTS, Jack...
Oma, there is nothing for me to answer, you are just trying to divert attention from AMEX and your forgery trial.
Well, Oma, dear. While grammar and punctuation remains a challenge, at least you seem to have learned something about showing up in court.
It seems you have made every single one of your appearances in the felony forgery proceedings. Granted, getting you to the first few hearings just involved a deputy walking you in from a holding pen, but I'm sure your indominatable spirit propelled you forward as well.
You are to be especially congratulated for your subsequent appearances all on your own, though. I'm sure the interruption to your constant posting was a burden, but I guess experience has taught you that bench warrants can be really nasty business.
And there you go bringing up books, dear. How interesting. Do you read as well as you write?
Rob your wrong...
I was told by the law firm that there would be no need to travel there for nothing since they believed Oma would get a continuance.
Mike Newson and others were told the same.
Bob, no dude you can't answer my questions because your a coward. A coward. You lied in court and to the cops and your judgement for whatever amount in a month is gonna be set aside, because you and your attorney lied, nananananana!
Oma, your are truly the Queen of BS
BTW you had your chance to appeal, Oma, more BS.
You owe me $23,000 - you lost in court.
No lies, no forged documents. You made these claims in court and the jury didn't believe you. 11-1 I won.
Sorry - I meant - you're
"nananananananana"?
Oh my God, you're a moron, Oma.
Just once more: you had all of this fantastic evidence, all of these sworn statements, and even someone named "Larissa Feinstein" who has fake addresses in the UK, and yet none of them helped you out? And now your friends are putting pictures of your tits on the internet, thereby embarrassing you with your Church?
No wonder you're bitter. You have no friends.
To put it in language that you might understand, "your a fucking liar dude".
Is that why you stiffed your lawyers, by the way? Because they gave you such bad advice?
Touche!
Rebecca
Justin/Oma wrote:
"I did come down to Ausitn when Oma was sick so did my wife and so did Mike Newson and others."
I'm all confused here. Which sickness was this?
Was it the illness that struck when James Vicsio at TransMedia started demanding payment?
Was it the breast cancer that struck in 2004?
Was it the 2002 colon cancer "Alexandra" reported to "His Eminence" at the Orthodox Church that left her with "100 stitches" in her colon?
Was it the uterine cancer that developed from the colon cancer she had before she miraculously had her recent baby?
Was it the fainting spell at the bank?
Was it the 2004 illness from which she was painfully recovering while she tried to justify her soft-core porn modeling to the Orthodox Church?
Was it one of the many illnesses that occasioned so many of her requests for continuances in so many legal proceedings?
Dear Penelope,
Perhaps she was hiding out at the Mayo Clinic as a demonstrator model?
Regards,
RJ
Justin/Oma wrote:
"your judgement for whatever amount in a month is gonna be set aside"
Isn't that about the time that you come up for your next hearing on the felony forgery charge?
Is Brian Watson giving you a two-for-one deal? Or is the Mensa team going to handle the judgment litigation?
Do you think the criminal court judge will give you a few more continuances while you wrap up matters with Bob Atchison?
Are you as stupid as you appear to be?
Much stupider.
This is for Bob Atchison cause all the other posts are bullshit and ain't worth answering ;)
Bob you are wrong dude. By October a brief will be filed with the State of texas Supremem court and will have preceddant cases where judgements likes yours that was obtained by fruadulent and perjury will be set aside, it will Bob how much do you want to make me Justin Edwards a bet. You lied in court and that's called perjury you gave forged/altered documents and because of these 2 points is why you won your case.
Second brief well that is up to the prosecutors but my guess and it is a guess that you will go to jail, JAIL, JAIL.
BOB YOUR JUDGEMENT IS GONNA GET SET ASIDE, HOW WILL YOU FEEL WHEN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS DOES THIS TO YOU. YOU MIGHT GO TO JAIL FOR CRIMES YOU'VE COMMITTED. NANANANANANANA!
Oma, you have sent me threat after threat for years via email and by your thousands of postings on the web under fake names attacking me. You even went so far as to try and hire a guy to kill me to stop by lawsuit against you. You filled frivilous lawsuits against me for 'defamation' and stalker when it was you who did these things to me because I stood up to you. Those were cowardly acts.
Even so, I stood up to you and I won in court 11-1. You lost. The Texas Supreme Court is more of your BS, more threats. I am used to them.
You are a convicted criminal and a con-artist with a long record. You have been jailed numerous times and are now about to stand trail for forgery and your bail was set for a million dollars. When you are convicted you will be sent to prison for a long time.
Oma, I am not afraid of you.
Since I am not Oma and you are once again pretending that I am I will say this I have never been convicted of any crime. My friend didn't do what you wrote on this blog and I hope dude they put you away for a long time for the crimes you've committed against her. You lie. You are a prolific liar. You are a liar and the records will be used against you, dude, you and then I wonder how will you feel when your reputation is shattered?
Btw, Oma is afraid of you and your nutty friend afraid because you've done shitty things to her.
You are gonna get prosecuted and your judgement against her is gonna be set aside because you lied and committed perjury.
There!
Yes, Oma, more threats....
You are the one on trial for forgery, not me, you are the one with prison staring in their face, not me.
Hi Oma,
You might as well stop the genuine lies. That's all they are. You aren't even smart enough to look at the RULES for Appellate procedure in Texas. Here it is:
Rule 26. Time to Perfect Appeal
26.1. Civil Cases
The notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after the judgment is signed, except as follows:
(a) the notice of appeal must be filed within 90 days after the judgment is signed if any party timely files:
(1) a motion for new trial;
(2) a motion to modify the judgment;
(3) a motion to reinstate under Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 165a; or
(4) a request for findings of fact and conclusions of law if findings and conclusions either are required by the Rules of Civil Procedure or, if not required, could properly be considered by the appellate court;
(b) in an accelerated appeal, the notice of appeal must be filed within 20 days after the judgment or order is signed;
(c) in a restricted appeal, the notice of appeal must be filed within six months after the judgment or order is signed; and
(d) if any party timely files a notice of appeal, another party may file a notice of appeal within the applicable period stated above or 14 days after the first filed notice of appeal, whichever is later.
The Texas Supreme Court can NOT hear cases not properly perfected for appeal...
You might really want to read Tx Code App Pro. 52.11. Groundless Petition or Misleading Statement or Record
On motion of any party or on its own initiative, the court may — after notice and a reasonable opportunity to respond — impose just sanctions on a party or attorney who is not acting in good faith as indicated by any of the following:
(a) filing a petition that is clearly groundless;
(b) bringing the petition solely for delay of an underlying proceeding;
(c) grossly misstating or omitting an obviously important and material fact in the petition or response; or
(d) filing an appendix or record that is clearly misleading because of the omission of obviously important and material evidence or documents.
and this tidbit on timing for filing...
53.7. Time and Place of Filing
(a) Petition. Unless the Supreme Court orders an earlier filing deadline,the petition must be filed with the Supreme Court clerk within 45 days after the following:
(1) the date the court of appeals rendered judgment, if no motion for rehearing or en banc reconsideration is timely filed; or
(2) the date of the court of appeals’ last ruling on all timely filed motions for rehearing or en banc reconsideration.
It is YEARS after 45 days now Oma.
Your lies are growing more pathetic daily. Truly....
As I said, much stupider.
By October I trust Ms. Hamou will be in jail. So it really doesn't matter if she can't understand basic law.
That's what her lawyer is for, so try and treat this one better than the others, Rasputin.
I am not Oma.
But Rob get this there are precendant cases that allow Oma to go in even way now to set aside that judgement isn't that cool. I think so. And a brief is gonna be filed in October to set aside Bob's judgment. Two the other brirf well that's all up to the DA and Bob Oma's not threatening you dude, not at all, neither am I just stating facts.
the pretender rebecca who hides behind the name to harass Oma, anyways get this we all know, everyone knows what all of you NUTS want God you'd think we'd be stupid after what 9 years if we didn't know that you morons wanted Oma to go to prison. I mean my God how many times has Bob Atchison tried but failed to make this happen?
Too many times and this too shall be used against him. Bob is gonna go to jail.
Bob father markell that priest in Russia calls you a liar, a priest in russia calls you a liar. tsk, tskl a priest in Russia thinks you are a liar because you accused him of co-signing for nonexistent loan, you are gonna go to jail.
Yes Oma, we know that YOU are "special" and the "rules" don't apply to you.
Forgive the real world where rational people have functioning and inter-connected neural cells who after FIVE years now of these same, tired, worn out threats...and that IS what they are after all...since NOTHING EVER HAPPENS...that those of us in the real world with real lives dont actually BELIEVE A WORD YOU WRITE. I mean, seriously "dude", you've been making these SAME claims since 2005.
Has ANYTHING actually happened? Nope. Nada.
HAS Oma DONE ANYTHING OTHER THAN GET ARRESTED FOR A FELONY CHARGE OF FORGERY???
Nope, Nada.
So, why in G-d's good name should anyone give a dead rat's ASS what you say now?
I mean, get a clue "dude"...you done been singing this same tired off key song for FIVE years, so why should anyone actually think anything is different now??
I mean, "dude" you did not even care ENOUGH about OMA to show up for her trial..
so now?? Are you so genuinely STOOPID to think anyone believes you anymore?
Yes, you are....its clear.
sorry P.
"It's clear"
Justin/Oma, dear. You really shouldn't write when you are either drunk or strung out on drugs. Even by the abyssmal standards of your writing, the above string of posts are so incoherently written, spelled, and punctuated that they are barely decipherable.
This nightly descent into confused rantings you put on public display has gone beyond funny to just downright sad.
Sober up, dear, or shut up. I say that with love, you know.
I wonder if her current lawyer knows about her grandiose plans to unleash a series of briefs after he (presumably) gets her off the hook for the forgery charges. Talk about ramping up the pressure.
Justin, why does Mike Newson not join you in defending Oma Hmou's somewhat tarnished honor? Where is Larissa Feinstein in her hour of need? It seems so unfair to put the entire chivalric burden on you. Mrs. Biernat seems to have evaporated as well. Why is this?
Was the e-mail that was posted purported to have been written by Newson genuine or not? Is there a reason why there is no record of a Larissa Feinstein anywhere to be found? And what about the Amex bill? And Mr. Pastor's office checking the blog? Why, if one calls the Pushkin restoration project, do they beome noticeably frosty at the mention of Ms. Hamou's name?
For the answers to these and other thrilling questions, tune in tomorrow for another episode of "As the Oma Squirms".
Good night from
Rebecca Jordan
I am not Oma either, Justin. It is a badge of honor, isn't it?
Honour.
Hi Oma,
Here is the Texas Government Code which sets for the ONLY Jurisdiction for the Supreme Court...You don't qualify, and NO there is no "case law" which says otherwise. I checked.
Sec. 22.001. JURISDICTION. (a) The supreme court has appellate jurisdiction, except in criminal law matters, coextensive with the limits of the state and extending to all questions of law arising in the following cases when they have been brought to the courts of appeals from appealable judgment of the trial courts:
(1) a case in which the justices of a court of appeals disagree on a question of law material to the decision;
(2) a case in which one of the courts of appeals holds differently from a prior decision of another court of appeals or of the supreme court on a question of law material to a decision of the case;
(3) a case involving the construction or validity of a statute necessary to a determination of the case;
(4) a case involving state revenue;
(5) a case in which the railroad commission is a party; and
(6) any other case in which it appears that an error of law has been committed by the court of appeals, and that error is of such importance to the jurisprudence of the state that, in the opinion of the supreme court, it requires correction, but excluding those cases in which the jurisdiction of the court of appeals is made final by statute.
In simple English: You never filed for an appeal. That appeal was never heard.
Therefore the Supreme Court is prevented as a matter of LAW from hearing your alleged claim.
Second, your Judgment is now LONG LONG LONG Final BY STATUTE, also precluding them from even reading it.
Boomchow Munki.
Oma, don't you see how ridiculous you look posting here as Justin Edwards with exactly the same words and phrases you used when you were pretending to be Larissa Feinstein?
They also match emails you sent me under your own name, Oma.
It is so obvious.
How incredibly stupid to be using phony identities when you are on trial for forgery.
The statue of limitations on fraud & perjury and stealing money has't ran out Bob. Your gonna go to jail.
"You're", you dunce. "You're"!
And if you have the power to change the legal system at whim, Larissa, perhaps you might want to exercise your voodoo powers on the charges currently filed against Your Friend?
Does Eliahu Ashkenazy know that this is how she spends his money? Mitzi?
Rebecca Jordan
Perjury is a misdemeanor, Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 37.02 (Vernon 2003), with a limitation period of two years. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 12.02 (Vernon 2005). A person commits aggravated perjury when he makes a material false statement during or in connection with an official proceeding. Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 37.03 (Vernon 2003). An indictment for the offense of aggravated perjury must also be presented within two years of the date of the offense. Ex parte Tamez, 4 S.W.3d 854, 856 (Tex. App.–Houston [1st Dist.] 1999), aff’d, 38 S.W.3d 159 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001); State v. Coleman, 962 S.W.2d 267, 268 (Tex. App.–Houston [1st Dist.] 1998, pet. ref’d); Ex parte Matthews, 933 S.W.2d 134, 136 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996), overruled on other grounds, Proctor v. State, 967 S.W.2d 840, 844 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); see also Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 12.03 (Vernon 2005) (unless excepted, any offense bearing the title “aggravated” carries same limitation period as primary crime).
5 years for Theft.
4 years for Fraud and Perjury 4 years.
And Bob thought he was in the clear! Bob is gonna go to jail. ;)
Perhaps the next time Your Friend is visiting her attorney she might ask him for some legal advice. I mean to say, she's paying for it. Or someone is, anyway. Mr. Moshein cannot be expected to provide all of this information for free, now, can he?
I'm sorry, Oma/Justin/Larissa, I keep forgetting. Is it you or Mr. Atchison who is actually charged with a crime? Oh, yes. You.
Someone is going to jail, girlfriend.
5 years for Theft.
4 years for Fraud and Perjury 4 years.
Umm Oma,
first, read above where Perjury is TWO YEARS. Long passed.
Second. Theft "is" 5 years, but that is FIVE YEARS SINCE THE DATE OF THE THEFT. Your Judgment itself is almost FIVE YEARS OLD
Third, Fraud, same problem as with Theft.
THE STATUTES OF LIMITATIONS ON YOUR CLAIMS ARE LONG SINCE WAY PASSED.
What happened to those pending and supposedly imminent FEDERAL BRIEFS you were filing??
Why the delay now for Texas Supremes?? You were filing Federal....
I think Penelope is wrong about you. You're not drinking. You're taking hallucinogenic substances. You do realize that Your Friend has been convicted on every one of these charges?
Has Ms. Hamou contacted another lawyer, or will Mr. Watson be expected to bear the burden of this insanity? Mr. Watson, I assume you have heard the Uncle Remus tale of the Tar Baby?
And seriously, Mr. Moshein, it's nice of you to provide her with all of this free legal information, but you should think about getting behind the whole concept of billable hours. Not, of course, that the concept means anything to Oma Hamou.
Nice try, Oma.
However, to get back to reality.
There was no fraud on my or my attorney's part. I did not lie. You brought up all this BS in court and the jury didn't believe you, you lost 11-1. You can't appeal. Posting and posting that I am going to jail makes you look even more stupid.
You are the one on trial for Forgery, not me.
YES Oma,
We all know your ego demands you think you are SOOOOOOO special and SOOOOOOO important that the FBI and Federal authorities have nothing else to do but investigate the YEARS OLD claims of a woman ON TRIAL FOR FELONY FORGERY.
You are truly so narcissitic that you can not see how ludicrious and insane this makes you appear.
The number of comments have gotten out of hand. Please use the new blog post to continue comments.
Thanks
Post a Comment