Monday, September 12, 2011

Why I must defend myself against Oma Hamou's lies and defamation.

When one uses a search engine online using my name, and my trade name, The Austin Wine Guy, one finds scurrilous, defamatory and simply out right lies spread across the Internet results now going back several years.

As law enforcement seems unable to assist me, and the person behind this campaign to defame me and interfere with my business and profession, named variously Oma Hamou, Oma Mcconnell or Alexandra McConnell is what they call "judgment proof" meaning she has no money, I must place this blog here. She filed Bankruptcy June 2010, swearing under oath that her only income is $2500 a month from her friend Jim Sproul's company "Reseda Screen & Glass", that she lives in rental houses in the Antelope Valley and in July she was evicted for non payment of rent from a house in Palmdale, and she has over $500,000 in outstanding debts.

I would NOT even have written here, had this person not continually written her own false and defamatory statements herself and aided and abetted other personae writing "on her behalf" for the last three years. If she doesn't want me to say anything about her, she ought not have been continually blogging and writing about me much less aiding and encouraging others to do so as well.

The woman behind all of this goes by many names: Oma Hamou, Oma McConnell, Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Hamou, Oma Demian, Alexandra Murphy, are the usual ones, but there are others. She uses a business name of "Enigma Royal Films, LLC" she also calls just "Enigma Films". The reason this woman and her "alleged" friends crusade to destroy me is simple. I learned about her genuine background, and she wants me silenced from speaking about it.

This woman admits that her actions are all motivated by her bitterness and hatred towards me, and this is the reason for her actions.

This woman, Oma Hamou, Oma McConnell, Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Hamou, Oma Demian, Alexandra Murphy and her other aliases have a twenty year track record of FELONY CONVICTIONS, multiple arrests, failure to abide by the requirements of her probation for her felony convictions which lead to more arrests, many many civil judgments against her for hundreds of thousands of dollars, a history of writing bad checks, and currently she was arrested late in 2008 in San Bernardino California on a Felony Charge of Forgery of a Financial Instrument (she seems to have forged a large check) After 14 months of dragging the process out, she paid the Victim full restitution and the District Attorney dropped the Felony charge. She has a history of evictions and bad checks.

This woman also has a recent default Judgment against her in Los Angeles County, in the amount of $55,000 which is admitted under oath was owing in her Bankruptcy Petition:
Case Number: MC020860
 HAMID REFAI VS ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL, JIM SPROUL, ET AL
Filing Date: 09/23/2009
According to the case, Mr. Refai, a married man, was "involved" with Alexandra McConnell, she kept telling him about serious "medical problems" and asking for "loans" for medical bills in the total amount of $51,000. This was confirmed by the fact that a woman who used to live in her house wrote on the internet THREE MONTHS before the suit was filed: "I lived with this lady, she is no good. SHE LIES. SHE HAS LIKE 50 CATS LIVING WITH HER AND HER HOUSE SMELLS LIKE SHIT AND CAT SPRAY AND PISS. She is dirty, filthy and uses old men for money I SEEN IT MYSELF. By the way Hamid's wife knows it was LIPOSUCTION you drained their bank account for, not cancer in your asshole. He had her sign a promissory note, co signed by long time co-conspirator Jim Sproul. She of course never PAID back the money. She, of course, never showed up in Court.

Here is the Final Judgment against Alexandra McConnell aka Oma Hamou and her "longtime friend" Jim Sproul:




This woman has been EVICTED FOUR TIMES IN THE LAST FOUR YEARS FOR FAILURE TO PAY RENT AND/OR GIVING THE LANDLORD BACK CHECKS.


She also has a history of failing to pay her attorneys. The following law firms have judgments against her and/or are owed money by this woman:
Freeman Freeman & Smiley in Los Angeles $10,000
Westar Legal Services in Los Angeles, $10,000
Foster Malish LLC in Austin Texas $20,000
Suzanne Curtis in Los Angeles $1,000

2011 "Alexandra Moran" rented a room from Patrick J. O'Connor, but presented an expired California Drivers License in the name of Oma Hamou. She then claimed to want to purchase the property. She delayed the purchase for FIVE MONTHS with numerous stories, and is now squatting on the property without permission nor paying rent Mr. O'Connor has retained an attorney and legal action is pending for yet ANOTHER EVICTION.  Patrick J. O'Connor will confirm. pjoinak@yahoo.com
NEW INFORMATION IN THIS MATTER JUNE 25, 2011:
Published on the web by Oma Hamou herself:
From: sarskaia@aol.com
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:18:25 -0400 (EDT)
To:
Subject: Re: The Motorcycle

Mr. O'Connor,

I will not be arrested for the motorcycle as you left it here because I was going to buy it. If you no longer want to sell it to me, I have no problems giving it to Ralph. He must contact me and arrange a time and the day with me so that we can coordinate our schedules. He or no other friend of yours can just show up and expect to gain access.


She admits here that she doesn't OWN the motorcycle and admits Mr. O'Connor wants his bike BACK.
So what does "Alexandra McConnell" aka Oma Hamou aka Alexandra Moran do??
She SELLS THE MOTORCYCLE to one "Craig" for $4,500!!

"Craig" gets suspicious because "Alexandra" can't produce the title (which of course Mr. O'Connor still had) and would only give him a handwritten bill of sale (a copy of which I have in my possession now). The Los Angeles County Sheriffs were involved YET AGAIN with her and her various names to safely return the motorcycle to Mr. O'Connor!
Selling property that she admits isn't HERS to sell legally! Isn't that "grand theft"??
Also, taking money for property you do not own nor have title to by claiming it is yours to sell is "THEFT BY DECEPTION" a felony crime for which she has been convicted three times in the past.

Someone else has recently posted a precis of the criminal and debt history of this woman. You can go here to read the specific details for yourself:
http://www.omahamoureality.blogspot.com


I have put up a precis of the specific information for her victims and law enforcement here: http://OmaHamouVictims.blogspot.com
You are encouraged to share information you may have about her and her activities with me.



While Oma Hamou aka Alexandra McConnell claims to be a "Motion Picture Executive" her online anonymous "friends" admit she works as a Paralegal in the Palmdale area. She has no background experience as a "Producer".

She is nearly psychotic in her daily compulsion because I stumbled onto these actual facts of her past, and present, which do not coincide with the personae she wants to project to others.

This woman, Oma Hamou, Oma McConnell, Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Hamou, Oma Demian, Alexandra Murphy et al, has for YEARS now, threatened me with civil and criminal actions. For years now, NOTHING has happened except more ongoing threats online. NOW HER OWN WEBSITE ON FEBRUARY 28, 2010 CONFIRMS AND ADMITS SHE AND HER "FRIENDS" DELIBERATELY LIED EVERY SINGLE TIME THEY SAID OMA HAMOU HAD FILED A CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST ME AND THEY WERE LYING EVERY SINGLE TIME THEY SAID I WAS UNDER POLICE INVESTIGATION, SINCE THE POLICE WILL INVESTIGATE NOTHING UNLESS A FORMAL COMPLAINT IS FILED. HER ONLINE ALLEGED 'FRIENDS' NOW CLAIM THEY HAVE LIED FOR YEARS ABOUT THEIR IDENTITIES.

UPDATE May 19:
On March 24, 2011 when Oma Hamou agreed to settle her judgment with Bob Atchison and PROMISED to pay him, she asked ME to settle as well and asked me how much it would take. When I told her a mutual settlement on both sides was agreeable, she ran straight to the Austin Police and filed a Criminal Complaint against me for "extortion". After speaking with Det. S. at length recently, and after he expressed interest in her background and criminal record, he told me that no crime had taken place, I had done nothing wrong, he would not proceed with the case and that he "believes is is possible she filed this to be retaliatory and vindictive against me" trying to set me up. I am NOT being investigated for ANY crimes at this time, according to the Austin Police Department.
She attempted to stonewall Mr. Atchison's debt collection by filing a "Bill of Review" for his Judgment. She lost, when Mr. Atchison's Motion for Summary Judgment was granted on July 26, 2011

She has FAILED to comply with Court Ordered Document Production and a Deposition by Mr. Atchison, who has now filed a Motion for Contempt Of Court against her on September 12, 2011


I am called a "criminal stalker". First, being called a criminal is Libel per se in Texas, since I have never been convicted of ANYTHING worse than one speeding ticket. As for a stalker, well, I have no clue where this woman is, where she lives, and frankly I don't WANT to know, nor can I care less. In the words of one of her attorney's, Dave. S. "the faster that woman is in my rearview mirror the happier I'll be" (yeah I have the email he said that to me in.). I WISH NO CONTACT WITH OR FROM THIS PERSON.

I do NOT wish this person ill, or harm. Frankly, I do not care about her. The less I hear about her, the better. That said, no one should ever be subjected to harm or danger. I DO NOT WISH THIS PERSON HARM, nor have I advocated, wished, nor advised anyone to harm her. Such allegations are baseless, wrong and defamatory. I just want he to leave me and my partner ALONE and stop the thousands of pages of defamatory lies she puts up and allows "friends" to post on her website in order to cause me harm.

This woman, Oma Hamou, Oma McConnell, Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Hamou, Oma Demian, Alexandra Murphy has demonstrated she has no credibility. You can read in previous posts where she has outright lied, most notably when she filed a report about her business with Dunn and Bradstreet that was investigated by them and shown to be completely fraudulent. She has been promising to pay Bob Atchison $15,000 for over two months, even claiming she had the money CASH but could not use a bank to pay him, and had to fly to Texas with the cash to give him! This was of course all a lie.

Ask yourself if the following make any, rational or reasonable common sense:
This woman claims to be an actress and model, but for a decade steadfastly REFUSES to provide one single shred of evidence to support the allegation, not even a credit, reference or magazine issue. She says only "I was and I don't have to prove it. YOU have to prove I wasn't". Does that make sense?

This woman claims that her three felony convictions were not Her fault, but rather someone else's fault. Does THAT make sense?

This woman claims that her recent Felony Forgery Charges in San Bernardino are "just a big mistake" and "law enforcement and the DA" are on "her side" and "believe her", yet they STILL pressed charges and scheduling dozens of hearings over FOURTEEN MONTHS. Does THAT make sense??

This woman has claimed for six years non stop that I am being investigated by law enforcement and the FBI. Yet, NOTHING ever happened, I have never been contacted by law enforcement for any reason in those six years other than one speeding ticket. Does it make any sense to you that law enforcement is doing ANYTHING for six years now?

Buddha said Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense.

Look at all the blathering posts she has put up on the internet, and ask yourself, do these things agree with YOUR reason and your own common sense? The answer is obvious.

As you can see, this woman and/or her cronies now LIE, falsify documents and use years old private letters to attempt to defame and disparage me, and Bob Atchison

Many people whom have come into contact with her call her a con artist and scam artist. She hangs out with convicted felons, even inviting these career criminals to live in her house with her.

You can verify all the arrests, judgments, evictions, etc for yourself with simple online searches.

You are free to email me with your questions, Rob@AustinWineGuy.com, and if you yourself have been a VICTIM of this woman Oma Hamou, Oma McConnell, Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Hamou, Oma Demian, Alexandra Murphy and her NEWEST Alexandra Moran, I encourage you to contact me.

263 comments:

1 – 200 of 263   Newer›   Newest»
RobMoshein said...

Hey Guys,

New Fresh blog, with the copy of the Motion of Contempt of Court. filed this morning against Hamou

Too many comments on the old blog. Carry on here!

Bob Atchison said...

yes, it was filed...

Bob Atchison said...

moving to the next stage...

RobMoshein said...

I will post the hearing date as soon as I have it!

Plus Oma has already read the blog several times so she is well aware of the Motion!

Bob Atchison said...

I am looking forward to seeing Hamou in Texas court before a judge again as soon as possible.

Blake Springpasture said...

Well, according to Hamou's tweets, she's just been too busy, busy, busy to think about annoying little things such as court orders.

RobMoshein said...

The Hearing for Motion for Contempt of Court against Oma Hamou is on calendar for Monday October 3, 2pm. Roger will be appearing.

Pretty sure Oma Hamou won't show this time!

Blake Springpasture said...

Oh, but we'll have posts about pressing business, medical emergencies, and all sorts of unfortunate -- but absolutely unavoidable -- impediments to her appearance.

That is, of course, if she can recover full access to the internet again.

It's got to be awfully hard for a scambird to fly with one wing clipped.

RobMoshein said...

Thanks Oma for CONFIRMING that you are now ACTUALLY AWARE of the Motion and Court Date on October 3! Not to mention that you have also NOW ADMITTED to having read the Motion, and I have the IP hits to prove it!

You've been served pursuant to Texas Law. Get over it.

You still won't show up on Oct. 3. If you do, the Judge will throw your wide ass in jail for Contempt!

Bob Atchison said...

Hamou will NEVER show up again in Texas. It's over for her here. I agree she will not show up for the hearing on October 3rd.

Blake Springpasture said...

Oopsie.

Russophile-who-is-now-Oma just posted with the same kind of punctuation mistake that Snoopy-who-was-Oma used to make.

And, Bob, I think you're right. Looking at her post today, Hamou is definitely not going to show her face in a Texas court at this point. She knows that, once there, the judge will give her a Hobson's choice: go straight to a deposition or straight to a jail cell.

Bob Atchison said...

This 'book' is really funny. First, I am sure Oma is writing something, but she doesn't have an agent or a publisher. The book is just another scam of one kind or another. I wonder if Hamou thinks one of us is worried about this book. I could care less! It is just so silly and even comical.

Hamou is getting older, she is entering the twilight years of her scams and cons. They are going to be harder and harder to pull off. From now on it is a quickening decent into obscurity.

The image of an aging cat woman, living in filth on the dole comes to mind. Is this Hamou's fate?

RobMoshein said...

Bob, that isn't Hamou's "fate", it is, rather, her "existence" and her "reality". She is a middle aged convicted felon, squatting in someone else's property facing a FOURTH eviction in as many years, with no JOB, a son she screwed up in the head who is now a drugged up paranoid schizophrenic gay man she plops in front of a computer all day to watch gay porn to keep him non violent and NO FRIENDS.

The homeless people who lived with her are gone. "snoopy" doesn't even appear any more as her alter ego, Mike Newsom abandoned her and her scams years ago, even hugefat debbie and her pretend daughter are gone. The neighbors want her OUT and she is under investigation on several fronts.

So, let her pretend she is writing a "book". She can't even write a good check much less a declarative sentence with proper grammar, spelling and punctuation. On the million to one shot some new victim publishes the thing after severe editing, we will both have somebody with actual assets to SUE for libel!!

But you are correct, it will be just like that pathetic binder of trash she called a "script", a new vehicle to scam the naive and trusting, she will probably use the next phase of her cancer scam to get money to "finish the book" before her cancer treatments or whatever lies she tells the next victims.

Mitzi said...

Darlings, she's writing a book! I'm so impressed! For one thing, who knew she was literate? And for another, darlings, she has to be doing it by candle light!

Also, Rivka, darling, your darling BFF is back. Or is she, darling?

Blake Springpasture said...

Well, the Woman Who Sued Herself is back at it again with her stellar legal moves.

Hamou posted yesterday:

"I do hope Rob you can prove this because I am coming after you for libel, defamation to name but a few and I am going to do it from California."

Of course she is "going to do it from California", as she now knows that her sorry ass will be thrown in a jail cell for contempt of court if she shows up again in Texas. Her days of zipping off to Austin to file spurious lawsuits and police complaints are over.

But this leaves her with a little problem. California courts do not have jurisdiction over Rob.

Of course, if the moron had a lick of sense, she would have known that ludicrous Bill of Review was going to backfire on her. And she would know that she has to go to Texas to sue Rob for anything.

RobMoshein said...

Oma knows it Blake. She tried to sue Bob for the same things in California years ago, and the Court dismissed it for lack of personal jurisdiction. Then of course she has the problem that she sued me for the same things SIX years ago and rather than take it to trial as ORDERED by Judge Triana-Doyal, she non-suited the claim...

She will have A HUGE PROBLEM with any other Judge because of that. Just like she did by not appealing Bob's Judgment...

She likes to make threats. She is stupid enough to think anybody actually pays attention. They don't.

She is nobody. Nothing. A middle aged never was, squatting in eviction proceedings, living with the homeless and a horde of cats and her violent mentally ill adult son, who she screwed up in the head.
She earns her "living" by pretending to have cancer and scamming old men out of their money...

She is a LOSER.

Blake Springpasture said...

Hamou tweeted:

"Have you ever been writing and hit a point where you just stop and you’ll like, no more tonight."

Well, I suppose the point at which grammar and punctuation completely collapse is as good a point to stop as any.

RobMoshein said...

Blake, she chooses "writing" because it is something nobody can confirm or deny! She wants to appear "busy", you know, "somebody"...

The truth is she is still stalling to leave Patrick's house. She hasn't paid RENT, and now is demanding Patrick pay HER to leave HIS HOUSE!

She has no respect for law or courts. Clearly...

She is a fraud and con artist.

Bob Atchison said...

When I want a good laugh I now go to the Oma Hamou forum. It's so silly and stupid you just can't avoid chuckling at each new posting. Keep going, OMA - you are making the world a more mirthful place through comedy!

What WILL she write next and as WHOM?

What will be her next EXTRAORDINARY ADVENTURE?

Keep going, Silly-Dilly!

RobMoshein said...

Actually, Bob, her Twitter tweets are even more stupid and inane! All she can do is re tweet Oprah and the Russian news and pretend she is "busy" when all she does is sit on her wide ass squatting in Patrick's house, feeding the dogs wearing a Goodwill found old skirt and hiking boots!

Blake Springpasture said...

So Hamou is in and out of VIP meetings today, where she is being told how good her book is?

And a couple of months ago she was in and out of VIP meetings about her new movie project, where she was being told how good her movie was.

And before that she was in and out of VIP meetings with the FBI, where she was being told how strong their case was against her "stalkers".

I wonder if the movie and the book and the indictments will all be released simultaneoulsy. I.e., when hell freezes over.

Whenever the woman opens her mouth, the wet shit runs down her chin.

However, she probably really is in an internet cafe. She hasn't been able to access the internet from her lodgings in quite some time. It seems it was a very localized power outage.

Bob Atchison said...

You are invited to attend a VIP reading of "And They Googled My Name".

On Wednesday morning Enigma Royal Films, LLC. will be hosting a reading of "And They Googled My Name" a new book by OMA Hamou.

"And The Googled My Name" is a true story documenting the decade-long ordeal of the author to reestablish her name, health, career and fortune after her name was hijacked by a group of stalkers.

Innocent - a successful businesswomen and a young, beautiful actress and model, OMA will recount her terrifying struggle for justice. Fraud, rape, cancer and two-headed babies scar this woman's battle against evil.

Come here the world-famous author read from her book.

Jim Sproul, says:

This is one of the best books I’ve ever read. The stories jump off the pages. If you can hear words in your head, these will echo with honesty and with heart and humor. Your going to walk away thinking that you know and understand OMA, the actress, model, philanthropist in the same way you know your favorite cosin or best friend.

Michele Biernat, says:

I would recommend this book to anyone who enjoys a true story told with passion. Though the topic is sensitive, OMA does not whine or rant. She tells her story, the story of a WOMAN with dignity and with a sense of the real person we know and respect living and breathing under the victim label from years of stalking. If you’ve ever been raped or have a loved one who has been raped, or had a two-headed baby, then this is a good book to read . . . Hamou waited to tell her story, and sometimes it does take time to deal with what life dishes out but she has risen like a pheonicks from the flames.

Wednesday, September 21 9:00AM

IHOP
39176 10th St W, Palmdale


Breakfast is provided! Make your selection from any World-Famous Pancake Combo. Transportation provided from the Palmdale Homeless Center.

Oma Hamou is the author of "Successful Scamming for Dummies" and "How to Live in Luxury Without Paying Rent"

Penelope Autumnvale said...

Oh, my dears. I was simply determined to make it to Ms. Hamou / McConnell / Murphy / Moran's book reading yesterday. I have the most wonderful lilac floral frock with a snappy straw hat that is just perfect for a weekday Combo brunch. But, alas. And alack. The place was simply swarming with press and fans.

I just knew it would be crowded, but I had no idea the turnout would be that strong.

It took me almost an hour to get a table, and even then I had to share it with a large box that was labeled "The Files". And the poor, frazzled busboy had not even had time to clean the table properly, as it and the box were covered with some kind of oily orange dust.

And I could get just the barest glimpse Ms. H/Mc/M/M as she was reading. They had the smartest little podium set up between the cash register and the warming shelf, just in front of where they keep all those delightfully flavorful syrups. And Ms. H/Mc/M/M was wearing the chicest little horizontal striped skirt which, no matter what other people were saying, I thought set her figure off just perfectly.

But, oh, my dears. Nothing -- I mean nothing -- prepared me for the outpouring of suffering and exquisitely-phrased emotion as I heard her read. And that voice! Oh, that voice! Despite all the din of clanking plates, yelled out short orders, and screaming kids, that sweet, chirpy little voice just rose above it all and wafted gently over the place like the song of an angel, carrying the saga of her suffering on the ceiling fan breeze with the humility and adoration of Job himself.

If only you could have been there, my sweets. If only .......

Blake Springpasture said...

Hamou just tweeted:

"Yes, I'm going through a rebirth...stay tuned for the butterfly to emerge."

Sounds like a new alias in the works. Wonder how long it'll be before we hear from her next victim.

Blake Springpasture said...

Okay, this is too funny.

Hamou, the "author", tweeted this:

"I am writing a book about having 2 men who have spent 11 years stalking & harassing me."

I wonder if the dimbulb realizes that the proper way to express the thought would be:

"I am writing a book about 2 men who have spent 11 years stalking and harassing me".

The way Hamou wrote the sentence, she is actually suggesting that she had sex with the 2 men.

I can't wait to get my hands on her book. With writing skills such as hers, it's bound to be one laugh riot after another.

Mitzi said...

Darling Robbele and Bobbele, just what have you two naughty darlings been up to, darlings!?

RobMoshein said...

Mitz!

L'Shana Tovah! How sweet to hear from you just before Rosh Hashona. You must be up to your ears cooking brisket and tsimmis.

All has been quiet for us. Just waiting for the Contempt Hearing next monday afternoon.

Am contemplating writing a book. Working tentative title is "Then I googled her many names"...

What do you think??

Bob Atchison said...

Enigma ROYAL Films, LLC announces a new book by OMA HAMOU.

9/11 !0 Years After - OMA Remembers

In her new book OMA relates her harrowing experiences on 9/11 when she narrowly averted death. She also tells the story of each and every friend she lost in the Twin Towers on that fateful day.

OMA talks about her new book:

I was on a plane from Boston to LA and when I arrived back to LA on 9-11, I learned that terrorists had hijacked a plane from Boston and had routed it to New York City, suicide terrorist and the plane went into the World Trade Center and then another plane headed for LA from Newark was also directed by terrorist to the second twin tower and then an another plane went into the pentagon and then another plane crashed in Pennsylvania.

I was numb, shaken as I could have been on the plane from Boston to LA that was killed.

I was at the World Trade Center and could have been on one of those hijacked planes or inside of the Trade Center when the tragedy struck our nation. It makes you realize what is important in life.

Like the rest of the world, I was shocked and dismayed by the sinister attack leveled against our nation. I have written this book to show our thoughts and prayers still go out to the many victims and their families.

Like many on that day I found myself scrambling at airports, frantic and my only thought was our loved ones. Many of Enigma's colleagues and associates were either killed or injured in that attack against our nation.

I remember on that day, as we sat comfortably reading our email, countless paramedics, police officers, and firemen were fighting an uphill battle to save as many human lives as possible.

Also, when that horrible day came to a close, as I turned off my lights go to sleep, I remembered the men and women of our armed forces who were taking steps protect us all as we slumbered.

With this new book, 9/11 !0 Years After - OMA Remembers I am offering a simple thank you to those brave men and women and ask each of you to keep them and our nation always in your prayers.

OMA


***************************

For more on the new book, and to arrange for a personal appearance of the author, please contact Stan Lee in Enigma ROYAL Films LLC Publicity Department at Universal Studios.

Mitzi said...

Darling Robbele,

Oy, darling, you don't want to know! We're having my cousin Meyer and that shiksa he married over for dinner, and do you think herself is going to cook anything to help, darling?

And darlings, they're all back over at darling Omele's! Somebody must have scraped together enough shekels to get the internet turned back on!

Omele, darling, people google your name, darling. All of the time. Landlords. Police departments. All sorts of people. What's the kvetch, darling?

Mitzele

Also, darling, while you're talking to your publishers, darling, and I can't believe I typed that with a straight face, darling, see if you can get them to pony up for an editor, darling. Or at least Spellcheck.

Bob Atchison said...

Mitzi, looks like Linda Blair has moved back in over at Oma's Forum.

HOW FUNNY!

I laughed and laughed - that demonic voice and those NASTY words...

CALLING FATHER KARRAS!

Bob Atchison said...

I suppose I should be grateful that OMA takes the time to write all these silly postings in her forum under the names of all of our favorite characters.

She must be in panic mode right now, as everything is falling apart all around her - moving from one crisis to another. It's got to be nothing but real, excruciating, life-threatening pain in Hamou's life these days.

Maybe the Hamou Forum, and all her birdbrained postings, is an emotional release, an escape, from the horror that's closing in.

Maybe she's laughing as much as we are...

Keep posting, OMA! I hope we'll be seeing you in Texas next week at the hearing.

Bob Atchison said...

More thoughts...

All of her postings are so lacking in common sense, so obviously by her alone, well, perhaps the forum has always been a clever satire by a ditzy natural comedian.

Bob Atchison said...

I mean, the two-headed rape baby? $66M trust funds - all the cancer - Universal Studios and Steven Speilberg - hundreds of Enigma employees?

Thousands of bizarre, absurd - yes, silly claims, all of it so unbelievable from the outset - maybe it was all just a huge joke.

I remember at the trial somebody who saw Oma for the first time said to me:

"That woman looks HOMELESS, did she dress from a dumpster? How could anyone believe she was a Hollywood actress? Just look at those SHOES!"

Yes, it was preposterous....

Bob Atchison said...

Everytime Oma posts about her 'book' I can't control my laughter. It is so, so, funny! I hope she's back to posting 10-20 times a day. I can't wait to read what's next on her forum.

Nothing she writes bothers me, I enjoy reading it. I enjoy writing my own satire here. I hope it makes Oma laugh, too!

Post as whomever you want, Oma. I like reading what you write as Snoopy, Russophile, Justin - all the characters you have created.

Create some new ones!

Bob Atchison said...

Hey, Oma. Are you going to show up in court next week? You should post in your forum if you are coming or not. This is a big deal that could have a huge impact on you. I hope you decide to show up.

Blake Springpasture said...

Oh, boys. I just want a judge or jury somewhere to get to see those emails she sent on 9/11 about her near scrapes with death at the hands of terrorists.

That ought to sit real well with them.

As will all the breast, uterine, colon, and rectal cancers she has claimed to have.

As will her shenanigans with Don Morton.

And Hamid Refai.

And Eric Cowan.

And Patrick O'Connor.

RobMoshein said...

Yes Oma. I'm sure you enjoy "living"...you are "living" RENT FREE in Patrick's house while he is evicting you. Have you paid him a dime in rent for June? July? August? September? October is due this week... Didn't think so...

You are "living" on someone else's dime, you have no JOB, you are up to your eyeballs in judgments against you...

you are "living" with your mentally ill violent son who you screwed up in the head.

you are "living" with homeless people and hordes of animals...

Yeah, nice "living" Oma...

Bob Atchison said...

Those pictures of OMA in church are very pretty. The wedding dress, the flowers in the hair were so charming. It must have hurt to find out that all those people in the pictures were laughing at her behind her back, that they said she looked and acted ridiculous in that ceremony. The Russians can be very cruel.

I wonder when it happened, when the people in the church turned against Oma.

She was complaining about it to Sautov just a few days after 9/11:

The Fedorovsky Cathedral is my church and sacred. But the women within have hurt our partnership and Father Markell, by telling strangers that I, OMA, did no restoration, just donated a computer and $3,000.00! This discredits Father Markell because he signed for completed works that Enigma did perform as well as the fact that we have the signed work orders and receipts as well as Enigma's bank transactions in conjunction with the Cathedral...

************

POOR OMA!

This must have hurt especially since Oma was still recovering from cancer of the colon and had reached out to the Metropolitan of St. Petersburg a few months before for his prayers for her recovery.

Oma writes:

Your Eminence:

I am writing to you to ask you to remember me in your prayers- 2 weeks ago I underwent surgery to remove cancer from my colon and I have 100 stitches inside of me. The physicians told me yesterday that my white blood count is high and that I have 2 choices chemotherapy or another surgery as they fear that it is spread in my uterus.
I am scared.

I am a single mother and I work hard and now my life... my health is not good. I have been in the hospital and now I may have another surgery this week. Some things are worth more than money-

Please forgive me and pray that my health be restored.

I kiss your hand and remain,

God's Servant and Servant of the Church

Alexandra


*******************

Imagine Oma's pain at having the people of the Feodorovski turn on her - to have them call her the Handmaiden of Satan - wow, what an awful thing to call a person, a woman.

Was it all just one big misunderstanding??? What could she have done? To go from those pictures to Bride of Satan in just a few months.... amazing and terrible. It still must hurt today.

RobMoshein said...

Bob, of COURSE it does. Why else would that ditzy scatterbrain bring it up over and over and over again? Why else does she pretend to have all these letters that nobody ever gets to see?

I still have the message from Father Markell about Oma "I have stepped on that rake three times now. I will not step on it a fourth time."

Hamou uses religion as just another one of her ploys and tools in her schemes. She doesn't have the slightest notion of what it means to be God fearing.

Bob Atchison said...

I had never thought about until now, but when those pictures were taken of OMA in the church her body was being ravaged by colon cancer - major surgery was just a few weeks away.

OMA is a survivor!

Rape after rape, two headed babies, stalkers, court case after court case, judgments, evictions, arrests, jail and she still goes on. Nothing can stop her, nothing can hold her back.

RobMoshein said...

Very true Bob. Even JAIL hasn't stopped her yet.

Mitzi said...

Darling Russophile Lady,

I keep telling darling Rebecca that it's you, darling, but she keeps saying no, darling, it can't be, her darling BFF isn't that stupid, darling.

But she thinks darling Omele is stupid enough to believe that anyone believes that there really is anyone posting over there at all except for darling her.

Anyhow, darling Omele, you need some new material, although darling, I appreciate the fact that your loss to darling Bobbele in a real-live court (as opposed to the fantasyland in your darling head) still rankles, darling.

And I would get off the Father Markell boat, darling. That note he left for darling Rebecca in St. Petersburg was pretty definitive, darling. He doesn't want that whole rake-in-the-face thing that you bring to the party, Herzilein!

Mitzi Kedem

Bob Atchison said...

AH, A SWARM OF SILLY POSTS - wunderbar!

More fun! I've hit the jackpot. Thank you, OMA.

Are you coming to Austin next week, I might have missed that.

HA, HA - more characters have returned! Hi, Sandman/Oma - welcome back, (snicker, snicker)!

Blake Springpasture said...

So, "Russophile", just put up a post on the "Ask Oma" forum confirming that you really are Michele Biernat of Benefit Design Group in Portland, Oregon who has been posting yesterday and today.

The real Russophile had no qualms about stating her name outright (although the real Russophile did have qualms about outright accusing Bob and Rob of criminal conspiracy, which whoever is posting as Russophile has recently done).

If you are the real Russophile, i.e., Michele Biernat, you will acknowledge as much now to allay the doubts that Hamou is posting under your internet name.

Bob Atchison said...

The book, the book, THE BOOK!

It doesn't bother me at all, no concern, just more laughs for me.

What about the hearing in Austin next week, you should be there, could prove a life changing event!

Blake Springpasture said...

Interesting. I'm watching an interchange on the "Ask Oma" forum where "Russophile" and "Snoopy" are exchanging messages just minutes apart.

But guess what. Only one of them is on line at a time. Hmmm ...... wonder what that's all about.

And, Oma-who-is-Snoopy-who-is-Sandman-who-is-now-Russophile, you really should try to watch the spelling, punctuation, and capitalization when you post as Michele Biernat. You're making the mistakes you always make, not the ones she sometimes made.

And I notice, of course, that "Russophile" is now failing to acknowledge that she is Michele Biernat.

Perhaps I should email Joel Biernat to let him know that his personal correspondence with Hamou is now being mentioned on the internet. He might find it interesting.

Blake Springpasture said...

Having to flee another property in the midst of legal proceedings. About to be held in contempt of court in Texas.

The stress is apparently taking its toll on Hamou / McConnell / Murphy / Moran.

Blake Springpasture said...

Oopsie. Must have hit a nerve.

Hamou just put up this post on her forum:

"Rob Moshein you are a fucking loser! Call Michelle's husband you fuck and ask if he has had a recent conversation with Oma you fucking motherfucker who hides behind a fake name to fuck with Oma you motherfucker go suck Bob's shrrieled dick."

And what's all this stuff about Hamou talking to some Hernandez guy? She's going to be a witness for him that Moshein is a criminal? Any lawyer cross-examining her credibility on the stand will have one grand prize of a field day.

Bob Atchison said...

Oh no, LINDA BLAIR AGAIN!

Blake Springpasture said...

Full meltdown going on over at the "Ask Oma" forum right now, with Hamou spewing out one profanity laced post after another.

However, she made a teensy little mistake. She posted as "Russophile" and then answered back to that post, forgetting she was still logged in as "Russophile".

Not smart. She really, really needs to calm herself down a little.

And to remember to put the apostrophe in "you're".

Bob Atchison said...

You know, Blake, I do have a lot to be happy about. I have won against Hamou year after year after year in court, 7-8 judges, a jury. A judgment for what I said she owed me.

SLAM DUNK!

Every time I win. I have great attorneys now, no need to worry about that anymore. OMA will have to play her games with professionals, while I can hang back and watch the victories.

I hope OMA will get the guts to show up in court next week so she can talk to another judge, PLEASE, OMA! She won't answer on that, but Rob says she has already posted that she won't be coming and I am sure Roger has that.

Bob Atchison said...

Ah, Blake so now you have caught her - just like Rob used to do.

Isn't it weird that she changes into that profanity-laced demonic personality and voice? I have actually heard it personally and it is so like the Exorcist you would not believe it.

I have emails you would not believe!

Bob Atchison said...

WOW look Blake - I just saw it - you caught OMA redhanded.

BIG CONGRATULATIONS.

How funny that she thinks she can get away with this stuff - either she's a out-of-control ditzy silly-billy or just dumb.

Bob Atchison said...

Ah, look she has vanished dragging her rat tail between her legs.

She's been caught - AGAIN.

How are you going to get out of this one, OMA, what's your explanation? Devil got your tongue?

Bob Atchison said...

From http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=58835 - sound like anyone we know?

"Periodically, in our presence, Julia would go into a trance state of a recurring nature," writes Gallagher. "Mentally troubled individuals often 'dissociate,' but Julia's trances were accompanied by an unusual phenomenon: Out of her mouth would come various threats, taunts and scatological language, phrases like 'Leave her alone, you idiot,' 'She's ours,' 'Leave, you imbecile priest,' or just 'Leave.' The tone of this voice differed markedly from Julia's own, and it varied, sometimes sounding guttural and vaguely masculine, at other points high pitched. Most of her comments during these 'trances,' or at the subsequent exorcisms, displayed a marked contempt for anything religious or sacred."
...

"Julia at first had gone into a quiet trance-like state. After the prayers and invocations of the Roman Ritual had been going on for a while, however, multiple voices and sounds came out of her. One set consisted of loud growls and animal-like noises, which seemed to the group impossible for any human to mimic. At one point, the voices spoke in foreign languages, including recognizable Latin and Spanish. (Julia herself only speaks English, as she later verified to us.)

"The voices were noticeably attacking in nature, and often insolent, blasphemous and highly scatological. They cursed and insulted the participants in the crudest way. They were frequently threatening – trying, it appeared, to fight back – 'Leave her alone,' 'Stop, you whores' (to the nuns), 'You'll be sorry,' and the like.

**************

I have personally seen this sort of hing before - scary, to say the least.

Blake Springpasture said...

Looks like Hamou finally got herself and her hysterically foul mouth under control, wrestled all her different personalities back into the box, and returned to her forum as the calm mistress of her little world she pretends to be.

She then posted this to Bob Atchison:

"You won your lawsuit with me because of the lies and fraud you perpetrated on the court to harm me. You won your cause of action to dismiss my Bill of Review because of a technicality not because of the merits of the case."

Isn't that always the case with her? She loses all those court cases (well more than a dozen at last count) because someone else lied or won on a technicality.

According to her, the process servers who served her and Jim Sproul in the Refai case lied to the court when they certified service was made.

Marcus Demian lied when he said he'd cover the bad checks that resulted in her felony convictions in Utah, Wyoming, and Montana.

Refai lied to the court about her having received money from him.

Patrick O'Connor lied about not having been paid all the rent that was owing.

Eric Cowan lied about her having altered the copy of the rent check she presented to the court.

Huiku Batchelor lied about the damage Hamou did to her house.

Tina van Veen lied about Hamou's new aliases, her cons, and her ongoing relationship with Jim Sproul.

The Mortons lied about Hamou's getting credit cards under various stolen identities and about how Hamou pulled off the scam to denude the elderly Morton of his assets.

And it goes on and on. Hamou is a sweet, innocent, pious model, actress, and CEO whose life has been cruelly haunted by an almost endless parade of people in all walks of life -- landlords, process servers, website designers, roommates, contractors, gentlemen friends, lawyers, cosmeticians -- who, upon dealing with her, launch into a stream of lies about her for no reason whatsoever.

What a burden for such a beleaguered innocent to carry. It's just a damn shame.

And for a woman who has had at least four cancers, been raped by website readers, and barely survived terrorist attacks in both Boston and the World Trade Center, it must seem too much to handle.

RobMoshein said...

Does anyone else think Hamou is taking the same anti-psychotic meds as her son? One minute she is on a violent, foul mouthed tirade, posting as her various made up "friends" by logging out and back in every seven to ten minutes...THEN suddenly she is back all calm and as normal as "she" can be (but still with ALL the same exact mis-spellings and hillbilly grammar)...

Oma, give it up. Nobody gives a crap about YOU and your sordid past, except of course YOU and law enforcement, and your long laundry list of victims.

Your "book" is as for real as your "movie scripts". Do you think you are somehow threatening us or "intimidating" us? Au contraire.

Oma, the only person stupid enough to pay you to write anything is Jim Sproul. Even Michele Biernat won't give you money.

You can't even write a good check, you couldn't write a novel to save your soul (which is a moot point, actually, since Satan has it already according to those in the Church who have met you.)

RobMoshein said...

Oh, and Oma. Before you start the screeching that you "aren't" they whole cast of psycho sock puppet theatre, the IP records show the ONLY hits all day while "snoopy" et al were posting, were from the SAME EXACT LANCASTER IP address that was reading was just YOU were posting as you.

and no, there is NO software no "spoof" that can not leave a hit trace. Hell, even PORTLAND didn't read yesterday so we know Michele Biernat of Benefit Design Group wasn't really posting either.

Bob Atchison said...

Yes, Rob, snarling, flame-eyed Oma/Satan has muted her foul mouthed taunts. Such filthy stuff! Looks like the comparisons to Linda Blair hit a nerve.

Nobody posts on the OMA forum but her - all these characters are phantoms of hers to create the illusion of friends and supporters. It truly is a sock-puppet soap opera. And it is so, so funny. She knows the characters are all her and she knows we know. Silly isn't it, that she keeps this up.

I am glad that she has finally started posting under her own name as well.

Bird-brained Hamou knows that she brought up these claims of fraud at her trial and the jury did not believe her in the slightest. Also, these claims were not material to her trial, since she admitted on the stand, under oath, that she owed me the money and had not paid me.

I won, as I always have against Hamou, justice prevailed. I will never have to worry about the courts as far as Hamou is concerned. Her record tells it all and I have always had truth on my side. I will always win; especially now I have these great attorneys. Now we are moving to final justice on Hamou and it's a great thing. Another victory is at hand!

I hope and expect to collect my judgment against Hamou. At the same time I hope that my victories over Hamou will encourage other victims to stand firm and fight. Also, perhaps new victims will be prevented by my case being publicized.

BTW - obviously still no answer on whether OMA will appear in Austin next week. TOTAL SILENCE from Hamou.

RobMoshein said...

Update: Ron Katzman, Patrick's lawyer CONFIRMS that Hamou's attorney told him Oma HAS AGREED TO SIGN THE ORDER TO VACATE HIS HOUSE and be OUT by 10/31/11.

SO I ask you again Oma, why have you NOT PAID RENT for October, Sept. August, July, June...much less the earlier part of the year?? YOU HAVE NOT PAID PATRICK A DIME TO LIVE IN HIS HOUSE NOW FOR AT LEAST FIVE MONTHS!

PROVE YOU HAVE!

Bob Atchison said...

I wonder how much that adds up to. Isn't it theft not to pay your rent like that?

Bob Atchison said...

Stop defying the Texas courts and all these Texas judges.

You are summonded to stand before the Texas Courts on Monday.

Oma, come to Texas, stop hiding in California.

RobMoshein said...

No Oma. YOU are wrong and lying, as usual.

24.24.142.82 read this blog at 10:40am CDT, or 8:40am Pacific, JUST before you posted at 9:08 am Pacific.

THIS is the same exact IP, in PALMDALE, that read the blog about ten times YESTERDAY, exactly when you were posting. You can rove anywhere you want Oma, but you can't PROVE you weren't there...and you won't either.

Oh, and Katzman confirms he still represents Patrick. You hear WRONG as usual.

You lie about lots of things Oma, like your long time relationship with Shari Porter...

Bob Atchison said...

Come to Texas, tell another judge all these things you have posted about fraud. You bring it up every time why not do it again? It hasn't worked but why not come to Texas and explain to a judge why you are defying their orders over and over again.

RobMoshein said...

So Oma, you confirm Shari Porter really IS a long time friend of yours and you knew her long before you wanted Patrick's house. THANKS for confirming that!

RobMoshein said...

No Oma, I just ASKED it. and you JUST CONFIRMED IT!! Thanks.

Bob Atchison said...

Just say "I refuse to appear on Monday".

No slithering around, just publish it in your forum and let's go from there. It's a simple thing.

RobMoshein said...

No Oma, you said in June that you knew Shari Porter for a long time before, but you didn't know a "Debbie Porter" but nobody every said her daughter was "Debbie Porter" but you were slippery and never answered if you KNEW SHARI PORTER'S DAUGHTER, named "Debbie".

RobMoshein said...

and since you SAID you had known Shari Porter for a LONG time, but denied knowing "Shari Porter" then you said you never lied, then you indeed CONFIRM knowing her for a LONG time before Patrick's house.

THANKS OMA!

RobMoshein said...

Lord, its SO hysterical to watch Hamou (logged in as "invisible") log OUT, then Russophile log right in then log out, then Hamou (as invisible again) log back IN and post as Hamou!

You fell right into it Oma, with the Shari Porter distraction! Cool...

RobMoshein said...

Sorry Oma.

But in OUR forum the notification contains the text of the post so you dont HAVE to click into the forum to read it!

Bob Atchison said...

So who are you going to believe about 'fraud'?

Bob Atchison with 6-7 judges and a jury standing behind him?

or

Oma Hamou, jailbird, con-artist, with multiple convictions, arrests, many, many judgments and evictions?

DUH.

RobMoshein said...

Bob

Don't sweat it. Nobody believes her. Judge Cooper didn't believe her.

Besides on Monday, you will have an ORDER OF CONTEMPT ISSUED BY THE COURT AGAINST OMA HAMOU.

There will also be money sanctions she will have to PAY YOU! PLUS, the order to pay sanctions is something separate that she can not contest when you localize it to California for collection!

PLUS if she doesn't pay up, which she won't, the Court will put her in JAIL until does. Just like they will do if she doesn't comply with the Document Production and Deposition!!

Bob Atchison said...

Thanks, Rob!

JustinEdward said...

Oma, for the last time, stop using my name as someone who posts on your miserable forum. You know very well that I have had no contact with you for years, and that I am trying to rebuild my life in Hawaii. All it does when you post your disgusting curse words under my name is cause me shame and embarrassment. Ms. Jordan has told me again and again not to worry about it and to stay out of this garbage, but I can't help it. And I swear to God, if I show up in any dumbass "book" you think you are writing I wil sue your hillbilly ass. Just so you know.

THE REAL JUSTIN

JustinEdward said...

OMA YOU AREN'T CAPABLE OF FEELING SHAME OR HUMILIATION OR MORTIFICATION! STOP LYING!!!!!

Blake Springpasture said...

I doubt the dimwit realizes it, but Hamou has finally admitted she is living illegally in Patrick O'Connor's house.

She bragged (using her real name this time) on the "Ask Oma" forum today that:

"I can stay until the house goes up for sale in a Trustee Sale at which point the bank will give me cash for keys."

Banks developed their cash for keys programs as a means to avoid the legal costs and delays of getting people out of houses WHO HAVE NO LEGAL RIGHT to occupy the premises.

If the person has a legal right to occupy the premises, the bank has no reason to make a "cash for keys" payment.

What Hamou has just admitted is that she has no legal right to be in that house and that she intends to extort money from a bank by refusing to leave unless they give her cash.

Or, put another way, she has just admitted to planning a con by staying in a house she has no right to occupy in order to get her hands on a cash payment she thinks will be made later.

What a dope. Of course, she is The Woman Who Sued Herself.

Blake Springpasture said...

Oh, and one other thing, Hamou.

When you say "the bank will give me cash for keys", just who is the "me" in that sentence?

Is it Oma Hamou, the woman who put up the post saying "I can stay in the house"?

Or is it "Alexandra McConnell", the woman who signed rental documents?

I seriously doubt a bank is going to be writing any checks to an alias, on the one hand, or to someone whose name was never on a rental agreement, on the other hand.

Sort of leaves you out in the cold, doesn't it?

Numbskull.

Blake Springpasture said...

But wait.

Hamou just posted an email she sent to Patrick O'Connor, signed "Ms. Oma McConnell".

So we have "Oma Hamou" posting that she plans to stay in the house until she extorts a payment from a bank.

And we had "Alexandra McConnell" signing a fraudulent bill of sale trying to sell O'Connor's motorcycle without his permission.

And we have an "Alexandra Moran" on the electric bill.

And we have an "Oma McConnell" sending emails to O'Connor.

Wow. FOUR different names just relating to her misdeeds with Patrick O'Connor ...... not to mention all the other aliases she's used over the years, going back at least to the time she moved in with Don Morton using a false name.

Rebecca Jordan, was it that time?

Blake Springpasture said...

Hamou, are you really that stupid?

You posted that it is "not necessarily true" that cash for keys programs are used by banks to get people expeditiously out of houses who have no legal right to be there.

Then, thinking to prove that point, you posted:

"Not necessarily true, I know of many friends like Carol & Roger who lost their home in foreclosure and the bank gave them money for the keys to their home."

Nitwit. If people been foreclosed upon, then they have lost their legal right to be in the property.

By the way, your grammar gets so incredibly confused sometimes that one never knows what you're really trying to say.

You do realize, I take it, that in that same post you also explicitly admitted that you have no legal right to be in O'Connor's house?

Rather odd for a woman who has been maintaining all along that she had paid all her rent.

Unless, of course, that woman is a pathological liar. Which, of course, you are.

RobMoshein said...

Hi Oma.

You are wrong about Contempt of Court. Just as wrong as you were about Bill of Review. Do not forget that I was CORRECT about what would happen to your bill of review all along. Judge Cooper dismissed it exactly for the reasons I told you years ago.

Contempt of Court
Texas Govt. Code:
§ 21.002. CONTEMPT OF COURT. (a) Except as provided by
Subsection (g), a court may punish for contempt.
(b) The punishment for contempt of a court other than a
justice court or municipal court is a fine of not more than $500 or
confinement in the county jail for not more than six months, or both
such a fine and confinement in jail.


and guess what will be asked for on Monday?

Bob Atchison said...

I have won every time against you OMA - it doesn't matter what lies you tell about the Bill of Review (and Rob is right, you lost for multiple reasons not just on a technicality, you know this).

I have won every time. You have lost every time. You keep screaming fraud and every jury and judge rules in my favor. The legal system takes a long time, but it works.

If you feel so strongly come to Austin on Monday and tell the next judge all about the 'fraud' again. You have been ordered by the court to appear so why not obey the law and use this opportunity to argue your fraud 'case' again.

If I win - which I will - you will have to face the consequences. That's the way the legal system works. Rob has posted what the law states.

Rebecca Jordan said...

Sorry I just disappeared for awhile, but my last week at work was hectic, and I have been spending this one shifting some furniture out to the Long Island house. So I really hadn't been paying much attention until Blake and Mitzi emailed me with the news that she's back and in High Crazy.

Anyway, let me catch up on my reading and I will be back with comments. In the meantime, I am glad to hear that you are going ahead with the contempt proceeding, Bob. As you say, the legal system has not been kind to Our Girl, so I think it is best to use it when you can. Of course, she isn't going to come to Texas. And really, Oma, you can scamper around double-daring Bob to take one more dance with you, but why should he? He won his suit and obtained a judgment! If you don't like it, you can always appeal . . . oh, yes, you did. I know. Why don't you write the Supreme Court of the United States. Ask them to hear the case.

And yes, she did use the name "Rebecca Jordan". That's how I found out about the wonderful world of Oma.

Rebecca

Rebecca Jordan said...

Good God, she's posting the Bill of Review again.

Oma: you lost. It was not accepted. It was not accepted even though you fake-cried in court in front of the nice judge. And speaking as a woman, can I just say what an asshole thing I think it is to do, i.e. cry when you are being thwarted? It's embarrassing to the rest of us girls, girlfriend, so cut it out. And second, you do know what the common definition of insanity is? To repeat the same action over and over with the expectation of different results? Think about it.

Rebecca Jordan said...

So this is what she has been reduced to, bleating about how everyone is lying, everyone is someone else (Blake told me that he caught you pretending to be my BFF again, you silly) and that when she tells a made-up story about someone who is dead, i.e. Sautov, we should all believe her, but when I recount the fact that Father Markell contacted me in St. Petersburg to disavow any interest whatsoever in further contact with Oma Hamou, we should not believe it?

Well, at least we're on an equal footing, Snoopy-Who-Is-Oma. You think I'm a man? I know you're a middle-aged girl. Grow up, Oma.

And you're writing a book?

Bob Atchison said...

Yes, Rebecca, our dear bird-brain, OMA, has posted that silly Bill of Review again.

It only makes her look stupid and it doesn't matter. No one reads her forum except us so she is posting it for herself. It must make her feel important somehow.

It was dismissed - she lost. I won.

All the sock-puppet theater characters have returned. I can just imagine OMA pounding away on her keyboard, switching from Snoopy to Sandman and back to Oma; all-the-while chatting with herself, carefully making sure she doesn't screw up and post under the wrong name.

As I said, we are the only ones who read her forum and we have proven these sock-puppets are all her, so why does she keep up the farce?

Perhaps it makes her feel less lonely - or more important - to surround herself with 'friends' and 'supporters', even if they are imaginary and all in her head.

Surrounded by cat filth, abandoned, living from day-to-day squatting in a property awaiting eviction, pursued by her victims for justice, Hamou at 50 years old faces a bleak, darkening future. She will never escape her criminal record, the legal judgments and the legacy of the harm she has done. It is all downhill from here and a slippery slope at that.

Those Devilish, demonic ravings are the true feelings of Hamou, the rage, the threats, the filthy language. Read them again and you can see the real OMA.

Bob Atchison said...

Oma, Oma, you can post whatever you want, it doesn't bother me. First I was there so I know what really happened. This was 15 years ago and long ago. In any case, I don't care. It only makes me laugh. I sorta treat it like a little yipping chihuahua trying to get my attention.

I don't care about your 'book'; after 10,000 postings on the web attacking me why would I be concerned about a 'book', written by a barely literate con-artist who ripped me off. Everybody knows who and what you are.

Bob Atchison said...

Rebecca, you are right, Oma heard the story from me.

Sautov was not there when I took my group of donors to the palace for their tour. There was no meeting between them and him. His assistant handled everything. They were nice and gracious, several of my donors made big contributions to the palace directly to the Catherine Palace. I had a number of members of the Romanov family with me.

Father took me into the private chapel of the Empress Alexandra and then we had confession in front of the original ikon of the Feodorov Mother of God and Father blessed me with it and the cross. It was intense, private few hours for me.

Father Markel would NEVER have spoken to OMA about it. It was covered by the confessional. Only Father and I knew about it. Sautov knew nothing about it. I told OMA myself. That was a big mistake.

So, there you go, Rebecca.

Bob Atchison said...

It doesn't matter to me what Hamou writes. I was there, I know what happened. It's enough.

Blake Springpasture said...

"Chinigans"?

Well, if anyone really is paying Hamou to write a book, I hope she's being paid by the typo, misspelling, punctuation error, and grammar mishap.

If so, she can buy the Alexander Palace.

Blake Springpasture said...

Here’s a thought for a sunny Saturday morning.

Oma Hamou / McConnell / Moran / Abramov / Ashkenazy / et al. has been claiming she has a right to use a different name if she chooses.

However, California law is quite specific that a person can use a different name only if the purpose is not to deceive.

So here’s a hypothetical.

Let’s say a person has numerous judgments against her under the name of Oma Hamou. That person then applies for a mortgage loan using the name of Oma McConnell.

The loan application contains a question that asks, “are there any outstanding judgments against you?” If the applicant in this hypothetical were to check the “No” box on that question, I do believe that would be proof that the person was using an alias for a fraudulent purpose.

Now let’s say in this same hypothetical situation that the loan application contains a question that asks, “have you directly or indirectly been obligated on any loan which resulted in foreclosure, transfer of title in lieu of foreclosure, or judgment?” And let’s say that person has a judgment against her for over $50,000 for a loan made by a Mr. Hamid Refai. Again, if the applicant in this hypothetical were to check the “No” box on that question, that would seem to be proof that the person was using an alias for a fraudulent purpose.

Now here’s another hypothetical. What if a person filling out a federal tax return gave a box number at a mail drop as a residential address? Or gave that same box number as a business address? Or claimed on a form that the box number was an apartment number such as, say, “Apartment 305”? That, too, would seem to be fraudulent.

I could go on all day with the hypotheticals.

Suffice it to say that this is the behavior of a con artist. Oma Hamou is a con artist.

RobMoshein said...

Blake, if you tried to call me, I dropped my phone in the sink which was filled with water...

Blake Springpasture said...

Yep, that one had me chuckling.

It's nowhere near as dramatic as being hit with a baseball, passing out in a bank line, funding the abortion of a two-headed baby, or being raped by internet readers.

And it's nowhere near as heart-rending as multiple cancers or constant visits to sick children in hospitals.

But it'll get the job done when the crunch is on and you're being asked to provide information to back up your claims on a loan application.

If I recall, Hamou dropped her phone into the water about the time the loan officer asked her to send him a copy of her driver's license (which, inconveniently, is in a name that would have tipped him off to her lie on the loan application about having no outstanding judgments against her).

The con artist's standard ploy: when cornered, buy time any way you can.

Bob Atchison said...

Well, let's see how she spins all of this!

RobMoshein said...

hmmm. did you know that the Fictitious Name Statement for Reseda Glass was not filed until March 23, 2010? Interesting....

RobMoshein said...

Hypothetical:

What happens when you tell the IRS that you bought a business in Early 2010, say around April 1, and you claim vehicle deductions and depreciation on the vehicles you own, including the other one you swore on your tax return you had for non business uses.

THEN just a few months later, in say June of 2010, you SWEAR UNDER OATH to a Federal Court in a Bankruptcy Petition, that you have NO ASSETS, you own NOTHING and have NO VEHICLES?

Well, both are considered UNDER OATH to the Federal Government, but one must be a LIE! You know, like Fraud...

Hmmmmm.

Bob Atchison said...

I thought Jim Sproul sold Reseda Glass to somebody in Southern California. Is this another business?

Bob Atchison said...

Another fraud, wow. Why am I not surprised...

RobMoshein said...

I don't ever recall being asked to send my drivers license so why don't you publish that communication Rob which you claim says this and prove me wrong? :wink:

OK, since I have your permission:

From: Peter LoPresti
Sent: Tuesday May 10, 2011 6:27 PM
To: 'sarskaia@aol.com'
Subject: Borrower_Signature_Authorization_Letter_-OMA.pdf
Importance: High

Good Evening Oma,

I need a few things from you before we can have the loan documents prepared. They are as follows:

* Signature on the attached form.
* Copy of your social security card (if you have it)
* Copy of your driver's license.
* Copy of the account(s) where your down payment funds are coming from.
* Brief letter of explanation regarding the collections and charge offs on your credit report (it appears most are medical so that should be easy) and also please explain why there was a bankruptcy filed on 7-10 and then dismissed on 8-10.
* Please request Sherry to update the purchase contract with updated dates and a new closing date.

Let me know if I can help you with any of these items. I still have not received the appraisal report, please re-send that along with the items listed above. We are getting close!

Best Regards,

Peter LoPresti
President
Rescom Financial Services, Inc.

NMLS #226304

Bob Atchison said...

SHORTCUT:

Whenever Oma says

"I can't recall"

or

"prove it"

it means it's true.

Blake Springpasture said...

It's interesting to note the date of that email from LoPresti. The loan approval was expiring, and LoPresti and Shari Porter, the realtor, were trying to keep the loan active.

However, they were now down to the short strokes and the lender needed proof of identity in the form of a social security card and a driver's license.

Two days after that email, LoPresti still had not heard back from Hamou. So he contacted Shari Porter on May 12 to ask for her assistance in getting Hamou to respond.

Porter responded that she was unable to reach Hamou, either, writing "I have tried every number that might have some info, but no luck so I guess that is that."

Finally, on May 16, six days after LoPresti had asked Hamou for proof of identity, he got an email from her saying that her social security card "may be" inside a storage unit to which she mysteriously seemed to have no access. Of course, she ignores the request for the driver's license altogether, since it would be hard to claim that was kept in a storage unit.

It's fascinating to sit here and watch a con being initiated, playing out, and then collapsing. It's a cycle one sees with Hamou over and over, going back to the days she moved in with Don Morton under an alias and launched her fraudulent movie project.

Hamou is a lifelong con artist. It's all she does. It's all she knows.

Blake Springpasture said...

Well, Oma, I guess when the truth boxes you in, delusion is the last resort.

You just posted:

"Still, you have nothing. I have everything I need to prove you, Patrick and Bob are lying."

What we have is a loan application filed by Reseda Glass as the borrower and Oma McConnell as the co-borrower. Oma Hamou has admitted that she is Oma McConnell.

That loan application asked the co-borrower whether she had any outstanding judgments against her. The co-borrower answered "No".

That was a knowing lie. Oma Hamou has more than a dozen outstanding judgments against her, totaling more than half a million dollars. That makes the application fraudulent. Attempting to obtain money fraudulently is a crime.

We also have a bankruptcy petition that was filed with a federal court under oath. It contains claims that are at indisputable odds with claims made on a 2010 federal income tax form filed by the same person who filed the bankruptcy petition.

Making false representations in either a tax filing or a bankruptcy petition is a federal crime.

Yes, Oma. We have the proof. Of all of it.

Blake Springpasture said...

Oma, the one who made the "huge" mistake is the person who was stupid enough to file a false loan application in an attempt to obtain a house from someone who was prepared to fight back.

The one who made a "huge" mistake is the person who filed a bankruptcy petition under oath that was at odds with a federal income tax filing.

The one who made a "huge" mistake is the one who filed a spurious Bill of Review that is going to get her put under a contempt of court order in Texas. On Monday.

The one who made a "huge" mistake is the one who thought she could keep conning people year in and year out without exposure or consequences.

Rebecca Jordan said...

Amazing, Blake, and you are exactly right: it is rare to see a con from the inside out, so to speak. This is all a little low rent compared to my career work, but fraud is fraud, and failure to disclose is fraud. Period. Dumb fraud at that, considering they were able to track your various aliases.

And golly, Oma, what a butterfingers you are. Dropping your phone in the sink and all. What did you tell him about the driver's license, that one of the dogs ate it?

Rebecca

Blake Springpasture said...

Hamou, if someone has "no legal justification" to obtain information by subpoena the court will not issue the subpoena. Dimwit.

Are you saying your lawyer failed to protect your interests by failing to block the subpoena?

Or are you just throwing up one of your usual smoke screens to try to deflect attention from your deeds?

The fact is that you attempted to take ownership of O'Connor's house through fraudulently obtaining a loan. The fact is that gives O'Connor the right to seek information about the transaction.

The fact is that you are a con artist and have once again been caught at it.

And the fact is that on Monday you will be declared in contempt of yet another court for yet a second time in the Bob Atchison matter.

Let's see. How many of your own lawyers have sued you so far? It's three, if memory serves.

You are the kind of client that must make a lawyer proud of his practice.

Bob Atchison said...

Another Hamou con exposed. Great work guys.

She can't weasel her way out of this. TOTAL ABSOLUTE PROOF.

You have been busted OMA, busted big time. You will get what you deserve. You will face justice for all of this.

Bob Atchison said...

Oma, Rob is not Blake, I am not Rebecca. Unlike your sock-puppets they are real people. Thank God they have stood up against you, Blake is really a hero, a true hero.

Blake Springpasture said...

Here's yet another example of how Hamou lies so fast and furiously when she gets caught that she can't keep track of her own lies.

At 11:42 a.m. today she posted on her forum:

"We were in settlement negotiations and reached a resolution regarding the unlawful detainer matter making the subpheona itself moot."

But she forgot that on September 29 at 1:31 p.m. on her forum she had posted:

"Nothing has been signed by either Patrick or myself with respect to the settlement of this matter so you see all you've proven to anyone is you don't know what's going on."

She lies to cover lies.

And once again we get that tired old story that her attorney didn't receive notice of any hearing. Just like she and Jim Sproul didn't get notice of the lawsuit by Hamid Refai. Just like she didn't know about the missed court appearance that caused a bench warrant to be issued for her arrest for driving without license, registration, or insurance.

Bob Atchison said...

Oma, we forced you to withdraw your fraudulent bankruptcy and I have won against you in court time and time again - every time for the last 7 years.

You are a convicted felon and a con artist. Law enforcement is NOT your friend and they are not your supporters. They know what you are and can easily look at your record.

I hope you go to jail for a very long time so that you can have time to reflect on the evil you have done to so many people. You will never apologize to me or any of your victims. You will snarl, plot and threaten them until the day you die. You are unredeemable and need to be separated from society.

I was your victim and the courts, a jury and many judges have affirmed this; I was the victim of your con, I fought against you and won.

You are in big trouble that you have created for yourself. I don't have to do anything but watch what happens to you.

Penelope Autumnvale said...

Oh, dear me. Poor Ms. Hamou / McConnell / Moran dropped her phone into the sink. How absolutely dreadful!

But I do know how the poor thing must feel. It used to happen to me all the time before I was sent away on that little vacation. I'd have a watercress sandwich and drop the phone into the sink. I'd have another watercress and drop the phone into the garbage. Then another and drop the phone into the washer. I was just the most awful butterfingers.

And, oh, how my friends did get frustrated with me. They'd be trying to tell me about how nice the spa would be if I would just go, and "plop!". There went another phone.

Of course, no one was asking me for an ID. But I do understand how some topics can make a phone so terribly slippery.

Remember my pets, when people tell you apples float, they're talking fruit.

RobMoshein said...

Follow this Hypothetical:

March 23, 2010 Hamou files a "Fictitious Business Name Statement" in LA in the name of "Reseda Glass". She then claims to have "bought" "Reseda Glass" from Sproul on April 1 for $10,000

THEN in June 2010, she files for BANKRUPTICY, claiming she has NO assets of any kind, no vehicles and she owns NOTHING! She is just an "employee" of "Reseda SCREEN & Glass" owned by Sproul. Now, "Reseda SCREEN and Glass has been a suspended corporation in California since 2005 and can not legally do business.

THEN she files her 2010 IRS returns, which show "income" of $38,000. She claims a "sole proprietorship" that "installs glass in high rise buildings" but has NO Federal Employer ID number, nor does she list any WAGES paid to any "employees". Is this almost 50 year old woman hanging off the side of a building installing glass ALL BY herself??

Despite "buying" the business in April 2010, in July 2010 she SWEARS under OATH to the Federal Government she has NO VEHICLES on her bankruptcy petition. HOWEVER on her TAX RETURNS for 2010, she has a Ford Truck and Toyota car, which she claims for depreciation and business expenses and she SWEARS on the tax return WERE "PUT INTO SERVICE ON APRIL 1, 2010 (Sched 4562 line 26)! and that she has a "personal use" vehicle, a 2005 Ford Explorer, all in 2010...

On her bankruptcy Petition, she claims NO REAL ESTATE! However, on her IRS Sched. 4562 Line 19h sge lists "Residential Rental Property" valued at $15,000 ACQUIRED April 1, 2010. HOWEVER, the Depreciation Schedule attached suddenly calls the "Residential Property" a CONSTRUCTION OFFICE.

OH, and did anyone else notice that her 2009 AND 2010 Tax returns were PREPARED on the SAME DAY and by the SAME PERSON, 4/11/2011, ALMOST THREE MONTHS AFTER ESCROW WAS OPENED!

Clearly, this "business" would seem be a sham to launder money.

LOTS more reading to do...

Blake Springpasture said...

Hmmm. Perhaps someone should report Hamou's tax preparer for filling out tax forms fraudulently.

I wonder if this Carol Uccinelli at Arrow Tax & Bookkeeping in Quartz Hill, California is the same Carol who has made fake telephone calls on Hamou's behalf.

In any case, the IRS might want to look into her bookkeeping practices. They seem a bit, uh, sloppy.

RobMoshein said...

I love how Hamou doesn't DENY the lies on her Bankruptcy statement and tax returns, she just says I don't have the "right" to have the proof of the lies!

Bob Atchison said...

So, Rob, you and Blake have discovered that OMA possibly lied and tried to defraud a loan company? She denied she owed me my judgment on the application? She denied that she owed any judgments?

What a snake.

Blake Springpasture said...

So what if Reseda Glass is not a California corporation? A bankruptcy filing is a federal proceeding, and any assets held anywhere have to be reported.

And note that Hamou is claiming she withdrew her petition only because she found out that it exceeded the limits of Chapter 13, not that she put incorrect information in it.

And it doesn't matter that the bankruptcy petition was withdrawn. IRS investigators who examine her returns will still look at the petition she filed under oath to compare the information.

I know the three pounds of documents they were sent to support the IRS 3949-A report will be daunting to dig through, but my guess is an enterprising examiner will take the time to do so.

I hope Ms. Uccinelli is ready for a little audit action.

Bob Atchison said...

Yeah, Rob, see how devious she is she won't deny the lies, just compalins that she has been caught again.

Did she think she would get away with it? Thank God, Patrick has stood up to her.

I just read on her forum that all of her victims are the criminals - not her. WHAT A JOKE!

Bob Atchison said...

Hamou says law enforcement are her friends and they always stand behind her. They know that she is the innocent victim. If this is true she has nothing to worry about.

Blake Springpasture said...

Oh, this is rich. Hamou just posted:

"the evidence like all the other time will vindicate me".

Like what other times?

When a jury found against her in the lawsuit filed by Bob Atchison?

When her Bill of Review against Atchison was dismissed?

When her own lawyers obtained three different judgments against her?

When three different judges ordered her to submit to a debtor's exam?

When the judge in California denied her a restraining order against O'Connor?

When she lost more than a dozen other lawsuits?

When she was ordered to pay "victim restitution" in San Bernardino?

When she was convicted three times for felonies in Utah, Montana and Wyoming?

Only someone who is utterly delusional could even pretend this is a record of being vindicated.

Blake Springpasture said...

Wow. Hamou met with a lawyer on Sunday. Must be urgent.

Too bad that thick package has already gone out to the IRS.

I wonder if the lawyer had any advice about her contempt hearing in Austin tomorrow.

Blake Springpasture said...

Just saw the newest foul-mouthed, ungrammatical post by Snoopy-Who-Is-Oma.

Yeah, this is the behavior of a woman who has been given advice by a lawyer and has the support of the sheriff's department.

Right.

Blake Springpasture said...

Sandman-Who-Is-Oma has, as usual, misread the law.

The only statutes preventing the disclosure of an individual's federal tax returns are aimed at limiting what the IRS may disclose and to whom.

Information obtained through discovery may be disclosed to anyone the recipient chooses, as long as the information was provided without an accompanying protective order.

There was no protective order accompanying the information O'Connor received, and he was therefore entitled to pass it along as he saw fit.

Of course the disclosure will cause Hamou problems. It provided written proof that she gave fraudulent answers on a mortgage loan application and that she gave information in federal tax filings that was at odds with information provided in a sworn federal bankruptcy petition.

As a matter of public policy, I seriously doubt that any court will take a position that it is improper to disclose illegal behavior.

The proper way for Hamou to avoid harm is not to keep her behavior secret. It is not to engage in fraudulent behavior in the first place.

Blake Springpasture said...

In the dinnertime post of Snoopy-Who-Is-Oma, here are the profanities (in order) that appeared in an 8-line post:

asshole
shit
assholes
asshole
shit
assholes
fucking
ass
asshole
assholes
ass

Kind of makes you wonder what she was having for dinner.

Bob Atchison said...

Blake - that's the REAL Oma underneath.

Blake Springpasture said...

I see Hamou has now taken down that foul-mouthed post and is now claiming we are lying about it.

Too bad we saved a webpage copy of it.

She's also saying we are lying about her fraudulent loan application and tax returns.

Well, let's recap what the written proof shows:

1. Hamou has admitted on her "Ask Oma" forum that she uses the name Oma McConnell and that she filed a loan application to purchase O'Connor's house.

2. In that loan application the co-borrower, Oma McConnell, answered "No" to the questions about whether she has any outstanding judgments and whether she has an unpaid loan that resulted in a judgment.

3. Both those answers are lies. Oma Hamou has more than a dozen outstanding judgments against her (including three from her own lawyers), and she has an outstanding loan judgment in favor of Hamid Refai.

4. Hamou filed a sworn federal bankruptcy petition claiming she had no assets. For that same year, she filed a federal tax return claiming she owns a business called Reseda Glass, against which she claimed business expenses and depreciation of assets. Either that bankruptcy petition or the federal tax return -- or both - contain fraudulent misrepresentations.

Hamou can call us liars all she wants on her website. But I think she's going to have a little trouble convincing the IRS and other parties that the above statements are lies.

RobMoshein said...

Hamou also lied on her Loan Application.

Section IV "Employment Information" she wrote that "Reseda Glass" at the same address as her "residence", which is just actually a mail drop at a Fedex Office store, was her employer for TWO YEARS, and she earned $2459 per month.

HOWEVER last July, Hamou SWORE UNDER OATH in her Bankruptcy Petition that her Employer was Enigma Films and "Glass Tech", and she had been so employed for TEN YEARS earning $3,000 per month.

THEN her 2009 Tax Return (not filed until 2011 by the way!) she SWEARS to be SELF EMPLOYED, earning 2,130 per month!

MORE LIES FROM OMA! All down on paper for the world to see no less.

RobMoshein said...

Its a beautiful day in Austin Oma. Too bad you aren't here for the hearing this afternoon.

The day will be even NICER once the JUDGE SLAPS AN ORDER OF CONTEMPT OF COURT ON YOU!

Toodles.

Bob Atchison said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Bob Atchison said...

Thanks for the last postings, Rob.

You busted her - AGAIN!

Serious problems for OMA.... I hope this will finally put an end to her career as a con-artist and grifter.

I just read the silly, stupid and weaselly explanations OMA has thrown up on her sock-puppet forum. I am looking forward to Blake and Rob tearing that BS up.

Yes, she looks like a no-show in Austin today, sad, I was hoping to join Oma and hear her tell her story to another Texas Judge.

RobMoshein said...

Oma Oma Oma...

The only person who puts you in the position of going to JAIL is YOU! Bob doesn't have to "cook up schemes"..

YOU manage to end up in jail without any help from Bob.

And a Travis County District Court Judge is going to issue a warrant to put YOU in jail again very very soon. Maybe today!

Regardless, you WILL be sanctioned, you WILL then need to pay Roger's bill for the Motion and I will post the ORDER OF CONTEMPT OF COURT AGAINST YOU after the Judge slaps it on your absent ass this afternoon!

Blake Springpasture said...

Don't you just love it?

According to Hamou, if she doesn't agree with a court's judgment against her, it is not a valid judgment.

Or if the judgment was never paid because she could not be found, it is not a valid judgment.

Or if the creditor was forced to write off the judgment for non-payment, it is not a valid judgment.

I think Hamou has found the solution to California's jail overcrowding crisis. Just ask the prisoners whether their convictions were valid. If one says no, the judgment against him is obviously invalid and he should be released.

Using the Hamou Prison Relief Plan, California could probably house all its remaining convicts in a single county jail somewhere. Maybe San Bernardino.

RobMoshein said...

Blake, that same logic applies to her money judgments as well. Notice her attitude that just because the company charged off her judgment as "uncollectable debt" then she doesn't have to tell anyone it exists!

Also, she SWORE under OATH that she OWED HAMID REFAI AND BOB on her Bankruptcy Petition. Now she claims she doesn't owe either of them!

Blake Springpasture said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Blake Springpasture said...

Okay. Hamou has now lied herself into a corner so absurd that she can only sputter and spew nonsense.

Here is her defense to not disclosing judgments against her on a loan application:

"You falsely accused me of committing fraud and perjury because of judgments obtained against me some of them going as far back to 8 years ago. Besides appearing in court documents they do not appear anywhere else."

I would absolutely love to see her in front of a judge trying to explain why a court's judgment is not valid if it only appears in court documents.

Maybe this is why she gets so apoplectic about our posting her conviction and civil judgment history on the internet. By her ludicrous logic, none of these judgments were real until they were reported beyond the court documents we have found.

So by that same ludicrous logic, we are the ones who gave her a criminal and civil judgment history because we published them, not the courts who, in her view, do not intend for their judgments ever to become an inconvenience for the people against whom they rule -- and certainly nothing they should have to disclose on loan applications when asked.

What an utter moron.

Blake Springpasture said...

Well, I see Hamou has already edited her post to remove the comment quoted above about not having to disclose a judgment that is contained only in court records.

And now she utters this nonsense:

"I wasn't advised by an attorney on how to complete my bankruptcy petition, there was no one at the Federal building who I could consult with regarding how to do it. I didn't understand everything I read as the paper work is not only daunting but overwhelming."

In other words, she erred in claiming on the bankruptcy petition she had no assets because no one explained to her that ownership of Reseda Glass is an asset.

For a woman who claims to be the owner and CEO of multiple enterprises (Enigma Films, the Sarskaia Foundation, Reseda Glass), who has had her film company listed on Dun & Bradstreet (albeit fraudulently), and who has retained more lawyers over the years than most people have ever met, her ignorance of basic business definitions such as "asset" is astonishing.

Or she's just a liar and con artist.

Bob Atchison said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Blake Springpasture said...

Well, the court docket is being called in Austin.

Good luck, Rob and Bob.

Bob Atchison said...

Oma you withdrew your Bankruptcy Petition because we caught you RED HANDED in your lies, you freaked out when we contested it. Well, you have been caught again in another FRAUD.

You denied I had a judgement against you - outright lied through your weaselly teeth. You thought no one would catch you, but we did.

I am your victim. I read that total BS your wrote about me making up the murder for hire plot. YOU DID IT HAMOU and you and I know it.

You defrauded me I sued and I won. You tried to have me killed and I foiled your plot. You are the FRAUDSTER, you are the convicted FELON, you are CON-ARTIST, you are the attempted MURDERESS.

Everybody knows it.

Mitzi said...

Darling Omele,

So let me see if I understand your logic here, darling. That thirty extra pounds you are carrying around isn't real because it only appears on your bathroom scale? Darling, no one expects you to walk around with a sign around your neck saying "I'm a convicted felon, a con artist and a grifter". Darling, that's what court records are for!

Concerned because you seem to be losing it, darling. Concerned so much!

Also, darling, if you are concerned about the amount of profanity in darling Snoopele's posts, why, darling, stop writing them! See? Problem solved, darling!

Mitzele

Mitzi said...

Omele, darling, so many attorneys (and yet none of them ever seem able to help you win a case, darling? What's the deal, darling?)and at least one of them must be a nice Jewish boy who is regretting like hell he ever got mixed up with the crazy shiksa! Something tells me darling Robbele feels his pain!

Sweetheart+, I'm still trying to process your logic about judgments. Does your attorney know that if the only place his fee appears is on a bill, you will feel free to ignore it?

Mitzi

Mitzi said...

Darling Russophile Lady who no longer sounds like Darling Russophile Lady, you seem to be flirting with darling Blakele, darling. Does the hubby know, darling? It's that Liza Minnelli influence, darling.

Blake Springpasture said...

For anyone who wants to know how compulsively Oma Hamou lies, this contempt hearing on Monday, October 3 in Austin, Texas provides a perfect example.

We all stayed silent Monday afternoon and all day yesterday as we were laughing our asses off watching her stick her head into one noose after another while she, in an obvious panic to try to tease out what had happened, tossed out one lie after another.

As Hamou now knows, the hearing was continued to a future date, and no ruling was handed down. However, with the session just wrapping up (and long before any records would be available through a clerk or online), Hamou began posting about an outcome that had not occurred. (All times are given as CDT, the time zone of the court.)

At 4:32 p.m., Sandman-Who-Is-Oma posted:

“According to the District Clerk, the Honorable Judge Amy Meachum found Ms. Hamou in contempt of court for not attending a deposition inside of the home of Bob Atchison and Rob Moshein as well as her failure to produce documents requested by Atchison. The Judge has ordered Ms. Hamou to pay court fines but did not issue a warrant for her arrest.”

At 8:29 p.m. that same day, Snoopy-Who-Is-Oma posted:

“Seems Chris you were given wrong information because Bob actually succeeded in getting the Judge to issue a bench warrant....”

At 9:00 p.m. Oma Hamou posted:

“I don't know who told you this but my attorney here in Los Angeles has assured me this is not true.”

The next day at 10:40 a.m. Oma Hamou posted:

“Here's what I have been able to learn this morning through my attorney in Austin: Judge Amy Meachum found me in contempt because of my failure to submit to a video deposition inside the home of Bob Atchison & Rob Moshein ……. I was found in contempt of court for my failure to provide Bob Atchison with documents he requested from me. I was also ordered to pay fines.”

At 1:31 p.m. Oma Hamou reported these non-existent additional details:

“In Texas, the Honorable Judge Meechum signed an Order that says I am guilty of contempt for not attending a video deposition and providing documents in the case Bob Atchison won a monetary judgement against me by committing the crime of fraud and perjury. I am ordered me to pay fines in the amount of $1,000. I will be paying this fine.”

Obviously, EVERY SINGLE ONE of these posts was a lie, including what the supposed attorney supposedly found out about the supposed judgment. It will be interesting to see how that supposed federal court in that supposed federal lawsuit will handle this evidence of how credible she is.

But at least if Hamou has hired an Austin attorney, Bob Atchison can attach the judgment to any fees he received from Hamou. I wonder how long it will be before he becomes the fourth attorney to sue Oma Hamou, his own client.

Blake Springpasture said...

Of course, the motion for contempt will still be heard soon and -- unless Hamou complies with the order to submit to a deposition on the terms laid out by the juge who dismissed her Bill of Review -- she will be found in contempt, something even she acknowledged by her panicked nonsense over the past two days.

And this is going to cause her a little problem with that supposed federal case she is bringing against Bob Atchison.

Besides the fact that a federal court has no jurisdiction to overturn a state court judgment on a civil contract matter, a plaintiff cannot just choose any venue that suits her.

Unless special circumstances are present (and being under a contempt order in Texas is not one of them), a federal case must be brought in the federal district in which the defendant lives and/or the claimed events occurred.

And that would be Austin. And Austin is in Texas. And Texas will subject Hamou to a choice of jail or compliance with the deposition order by one of its courts if she shows up in Texas.

Of course, if Hamou really had a Los Angeles attorney preparing this ludicrous federal suit, she would know all this.

Blake Springpasture said...

Sorry for so many posts, but there's just so much confusion to clear up from Hamou's panicked rants over the past two days.

Hamou, a monetary sanction issued in a contempt proceeding is not a "fine". You cannot just pay it and make the case go away like a traffic ticket.

You STILL have to comply with the court's order to submit to a deposition and debtor's exam in order not to be deemed in continuing contempt.

A jury heard your claims of fraud by Bob Atchison during your trial. They found for him and against you.

The judge issued a judgment against you.

You failed to appeal or move for a new trial and thereby lost your right to contest the verdict.

Your Bill of Review has been dismissed.

Three judges have ruled that you owe Bob the judgment.

Two judges have ordered you to submit to a debtor's exam and deposition.

No state or federal court ANYWHERE is going to give you another bite at this apple.

IT'S OVER. YOU LOST.

Your insane inability to come to terms with that simple, irreversible fact and the equally insane vendetta you launched and took to the internet after you lost that judgment has now mushroomed into an ongoing exposure of your life as a grifter.

With every new grift, with every new victim who comes forward, the information we have on you and how you run your con games just expands and expands.

YOU chose to put your life on the internet (or at least the life you wanted people to believe you led) and to entwine that tale with this vendetta. In doing so you opened your life to a scrutiny of the claims you have made about yourself and against Bob Atchison and Rob Moshein.

It has not gone well for you. And it's bound to get worse as your life continues to spiral downward.

Nice job.

RobMoshein said...

Blake, Bob and I spent yesterday in near constant hysterical laughing at Hamou's incredible lies, over and over all day long. It was fun to watch her spew her lies and watch them grow ever more ludicrous by the hour!

I am glad that if Hamou DID really get a local attorney, Bob can levy every penny of her retainer paid in advance as part of his legal judgment AND Roger can serve him locally with the re-scheduled hearing date for the Motion for Contempt. Roger decided to postpone because he wanted to include more documents...

Can't wait to watch Hamou lie her way out of this new mess she so stupicly yet typically created for herself!

RobMoshein said...

Oh, and Oma, Blake is quite correct.

SANCTIONS are not a "fine" to make the Contempt Order go away. They are PUNISHMENT for your refusal to comply with Judge Harger's ORDERS to provide documents and attend a deposition. Don't forget he didn't demand you do it at the house, SO LONG AS YOU PAY FOR THE LOCATION IN AUSTIN AND THE RECORDING

Guess what happens when the Court issues ONE Contempt order against you and you STILL refuse to comply with the document production and deposition? THE JUDGE PUTS YOU IN JAIL UNTIL SUCH TIME AS YOU COMPLY!

Ask your Austin "attorney" if you have one about this...and make sure he gives Roger his address for that levy of your retainer!

Blake Springpasture said...

Hamou, the hearing was not "cancelled." The case was called and Atchison and his attorney appeared.

However, the notice that you had been served by mail was missing from the court's file, and the judge continued the matter until the notice to appear could be located or another service made.

It's a delay but otherwise no problem. As you used a mailbox address in filing your recent pleadings in Texas, re-mailing notice to that mailbox address is a sufficient means of serving notice again. Hiding in the bushes to duck personal service won't turn the trick for you. When you file by mail, you can be served my mail. (There's a certain symmetry to the legal system that always seems to elude you.)

On the other hand, if you now have an attorney representing you, notice can simply be sent to him right there in Austin.

Either way, you are going to submit to a debtor's exam or be held in contempt of court.

There is no "fine" that will get you off the hook on which you hung yourself with that ludicrous Bill of Review.

You might want to try a different lawyer on that "federal lawsuit", however, if he's telling you that you can sue in any federal district you choose. You are going to have to go to Texas to sue Bob or Rob in federal court, whether you like it of not.

By then, there'll be an outstanding warrant for your arrest if you haven't complied with the order to be deposed.

Whether you like it or not, courts proceed by rules of jurisdiction and venue (which are separate things), and they are not thrown out the window simply to suit the likes of you.

The Bill of Review should have taught you that, but you're probably too dimwitted to absorb the lesson.

Blake Springpasture said...

There you go again, Hamou, accusing Rob Moshein of doing something illegal.

Perhaps you would like to cite what law is being broken when discovery documents that were not under a protective order are released to other parties of a litigant's choosing?

The U.S. does not run a Star Chamber system. Court proceedings and the documents that support them are not secret and are available to non-litigants. If a person can make the case that the documents warrant being kept secret for a legitimate reason, the proper procedure is to apply to the court for a protective order when the subpoena is issued. (This procedure exists for the very reason that discovery documents are otherwise viewed as available to non-litigants.)

The particular documents that are causing you to tear your hair out were under no such order. Moshein has violated no law.

A court will not issue a subpoena without notice to the opposing party or his counsel. It is not Rob Moshein's problem if you think your lawyer was not doing his job in trying to block the release of the documents in a public court case.

Nor has he published them anywhere, as far as I can tell. Your own earlier post where you claimed he had "published" your tax returns proved that whatever it is he has stored on that server site cannot be accessed by the public.

RobMoshein said...

Oma you were SERVED and you also had actual notice as demonstrated by your pages of posts...

The Notice of Service document was not in the Court records. Roger had filed it, but did not have the original copy with him, so he just had to reschedule the hearing because there was not enough time to get back to his office, find it and return to court. No biggie.

See you in a couple of weeks...nah, you won't show again because the Judge might JUST put you in jail until you comply.

Blake Springpasture said...

I see Hamou is silent on how her attorney, and Snoopy, and Sandman got so much false information about what happened in court with the contempt motion on October 3. Well, I guess there's no point in having to say, "I was lying", as it's crystal clear she was.

As for that attorney she supposedly "hired" in Austin -- he has talked with Bob Atchison's attorney, Roger Borgelt, and made a point of saying that he is not Hamou's attorney of record in the case. In other words, she called him and asked him to make some inquiries, but he made it clear that other than just trying to find out what's going on, he is not formally representing her in the case. That's a long shot from planning to make a Special Appearance on her behalf, as she claimed.

Now, here's what he was told:

The contempt hearing is already reset for October 17. It will go forward unless one of two things happens. Hamou has to submit the documents that were subpoenaed and appear in person for the deposition before that date ..... or she has to pay the judgment she owes Bob Atchison in full, including statutory interest, before that date. None of her notorious promises to pay will be accepted.

Otherwise the hearing will stay on the calendar, and Hamou will be found in contempt.

RobMoshein said...

Wow,

Oma picked a criminal defense attorney who specialized in DWIs...and
HE IS NOT HER ATTORNEY OF RECORD. Those were his first words to Roger.

So he does NOT represent her...

The Motion for Contempt Hearing has been re set for October 17 (that's a Monday Oma...)

Bob did agree that if you provide the Document production AND attend a deposition in Austin before the 17th he will dismiss the Contempt Motion.

You can also pay the Judgment in FULL, about $20,000 with the interest accrued at 6% since October 2005...before that date as well...

But, you won't do any of that.

Bob Atchison said...

Blake, amazing isn't it, the torrents of lies that appeared on her forum when she was in the dark. As Rob wrote, you should have been here for the gales of laughter as each one of those lies went up. UNBELIEVABLE.

Well, what will she do - just leave them up and try and ignore the elephant in the room?

All of these sock-puppets, again and again. So silly, but our bird-brained Hamou, just has to have friends, even if they aren't real. How lonely she would be in her forum without them.

She has few choices now, and the time frame is very short - just a few days.

Watch for the threats to grow in shrillness and nastiness. It's all she can do. We have all heard this BS for years and years - we know it for what it is. It just makes us laugh.

Bob Atchison said...

Hey, Oma - are you ever going to answer Blake about the lies you told?

Mitzi said...

Darling Omele,

I'll just bet you're too mad at darling Sandman and darling but foul-mouthed Snoopy for telling you all those lies, darling, and probably you're even mad at yourself for telling yourself all those lies, darling, to even think of answering darling Blake.

I know, darling. It doesn't make any sense. But then you never do, darling!

Blake Springpasture said...

Don't you just love it?

First Hamou posts this line:

"I have been advised by the Los Angeles law firm who now represents me in the upcoming civil litigation matter which will be filed in Federal Court to not view or respond to anything published on the web by Rob Moshein, Bob Atchison or any other person of their ilk."

Then she proceeds in the very same post to respond to many things supposedly posted on the web by Rob Moshein, et al.

Among them was this little typo-ridden gem:

"Niether Rob Moshein or Bob Atchison had no legal right to publish any of the communications which were under a court subpheona for the Unlawful Detainer."

In her typically disastrous grammar, Hamou managed to say that Moshein and Atchison do have the right to the subpoenaed documents. (She apparently never will grasp the concept of double negatives.)

However inadvertently, Hamou actually stated the truth. With no protective order accompanying the subpoena, those documents are a matter of public record as they are part of a public court case.

Either Hamou is lying about having a high-powered Los Angeles law firm engaged on her behalf or, with her stellar instincts for legal strategy, she has decided to ignore their counsel.

She is, after all, not only the Woman Who Sued Herself. She is also the woman who went all the way to Texas for highly-trumpeted vindication and came away with a contempt order looming.

Rebecca Jordan said...

It's even better than that, Blake. She is now on record as suggesting to Judge Meachum what her penalties should be when the contempt order is issued. Talk about a full service defendant!

Blake Springpasture said...

Full service, indeed. She is now also on record as intending just to pay a "fine" instead of complying with the deposition order.

I hear that Roger Borgelt is taking her posts to the hearing on October 17 to show that she taunted Bob Atchison to come to California if he wants to enforce his judgment and that she has no intention of complying with a Texas court order, even though she chose to put herself under the jurisdiction of a Texas court when she filed her Bill of Review.

I think that will increase the chance that the judge will go ahead and issue a bench warrant rather than give her another chance to comply voluntarily.

But we'll see. Even if she is first given another chance to comply, we all know she is determined never to submit to a deposition in Texas. So, whether sooner or later, there will be a bench warrant issued for her arrest in Texas.

RobMoshein said...

More lies from Oma...as she tries to spin herself out of all the previous lies of the week...

Lie 1: (Hillbilly grammar aside...)The firm I paid yesterday in Austin, Texas also practices law in other areas such as but limited too civil litigation

Their website is at: http://www.wm-attorneys.com/

From which I quote:
Practice areas:
DWI
Theft
Fraud
Juvenile
Homicide
Theft Crimes
Assault
Family Violence
Child Abuse
Sex Crimes
Federal Crimes
Drug Laywer

Additional Practice Areas
Personal Injury
Entertainment Law
Corporate Law
Family Law

Notice the term "Civil Litigation" does not appear anywhere on their website.

SECOND LIE:
An attorney in Austin, will be making a limited appearance on my behalf in any upcoming hearing on any Motion filed by Bob Atchison concerning the 2005 judgement he got against me


First, dimwit, the term in Texas is "Special appearance" and a "Special appearance" can ONLY be made to challenge jurisdiction over the entire lawsuit, when first filed. See TRCP 120 et seq.

Further: "Every appearance in an action before judgment (emph. added) is a general appearance. TRCP 120a(1)Guttierrez v. Deloitte & Touche 100 S.W.3d 261, 267.

Your "lawyer" if remotely competent would already KNOW that one can NOT complain about jurisdiction POST JUDGMENT.

typical idiot lies of a dimwit hillbilly.

Bob Atchison said...

A deafening silence has descended on the Hamou forum. No new threats and outrageous lies from any of the Oma sock-puppets or Hamou herself.

I wonder what's up... October 17 is just a few days away.

RobMoshein said...

Well, Bob. She probably had all internet access shut off, or maybe her electricity...all she has left is Twitter, which she can use from her phone...

Blake Springpasture said...

Well, guys, perhaps she's taking the advice of that high-powered law firm that's now representing her.

Let me know as soon as you hear from them so that I can let Thomas Ward know who they are. He said he'd get a writ of attachment for the Refai judgment on any retainer fees he finds out she paid anyone.

Mitzi said...

Darlings, I think it is the LA firm that darling Harry Hamlin and even more darling Corbin Bernsen used to work for back in the day! So excited for Omele, but darling, watch out for the elevator shafts in that building!

Mitzi

RobMoshein said...

Mitz!

G'mar chatima tova. I hope your fast wasn't too difficult.

I think she may have re-united that "crack team of Mensa lawyers" that she hired for the PREVIOUS lawsuit in Federal Court. The ones that have those huge boxes of files that snoopy PERSONALLY delivered...

Yeah, it has to be them.

RobMoshein said...

Well, Hamou is at least reading the blog again. NEXT MONDAY is the Contempt Order hearing.

Bob Atchison said...

Please come to Austin next week for the hearing and tell the Judge your story, along with the fact you don't believe you are bound by any decision of the Texas Courts. Stand up for what you believe. You have flown here so many times over the last few months money and getting a ticket can't be a problem...

Bob Atchison said...

Everyone has vanished at once from Hamou's forum... no silly sockpuppets, no Oma. No more fun.

Penelope Autumnvale said...

Oh me, oh my. Sometimes I just weep in admiration of Ms. Hamou / McConnell / Moran's uplifting outlook amidst all her woes.

Her tweets are nothing less than inspirational, so full as they are of wisdom, peace, charity, and humble acceptance of human foibles. In fact, my pets, I'm sure they reflect the true woman lying underneath that moldering heap of legal problems under which she always seems to find herself buried.

I was discussing this with Betty Ford (or whatever her name is) just the other day. (Yes, my sweets. We are talking again. I know I got a bit verrückt when she and Mr. A cast their glances each other's way, if you know what I mean. But, knowing as I do what Mr. A's "glances" are really like ....... well, why hold it against a woman who just got a little confused about a watercress sandwich recipe?)

As do I, Betty (?) also finds Ms. H/M/M's tweets deeply moving. As she told me just yesterday, anyone who admires that nice Mr. Putin and his clever little managed democracy so uncritically must have a soul with real depth of understanding. And she's right. If mein Volk had shown the same understanding a little longer way back when, just think where we could all be today. More than just the trains would be running on time, let me tell you.

But I digress, my pets.

The thought I really meant to leave with you all today is that Ms. H/M/M should keep up her spiritually moving tweets. I'm sure people at the IRS will be moved to tears once they look beyond all those inconvenient tax forms and that confusing little bankrupty matter to see the outpouring of her true soul on twitter.

RobMoshein said...

Dear Ms P

I appreciate your sentiments, but closer examination of Hamou's tweets shows a growing mental instability.

For example, she tweets to people who ARE NOT USING TWITTER! she tweeted "thanks" to Father Markell, who doesn't USE or READ twitter...

also she LIES in her tweets, as she did when she said google was going to "identify" to her the users of this blog. Google will NOT do so without a COURT ORDER, and THEN must contact me and all other users PRIOR to releasing any such information (this is all in the terms of service agreement)...

she also lied when she tweeted she talked to "her texas attorney". By the man's OWN ADMISSION he does NOT represent Hamou...

Seriously, how screwed up in the head is it to tweet to people who aren't there and to LIE on twitter. That's like talking to people who aren't there and pathologically lying to everyone you talk to...

oh, right...Hamou already DOES all those things....

OH, and Oma, if you are going to pretend to have stayed in a hotel, at least SPELL THE NAME CORRECTLY, otherwise you look like the illiterate hillbilly you are...The hotel is the DRISKILL (not Driscoll). I'm having dinner there tomorrow night with Sara Moulton the chef...

RobMoshein said...

This is HYSTERICAL! I'm sitting on the Hamou forum and WATCHING as "sandman" keeps editing and adding stuff to what is alleged to be an "EXACT QUOTE" from a PM....

Oma, you're losing your grip on what little rational thought you might have left....but its a hoot to watch you melt down....

RobMoshein said...

HYSTERICAL!!! Every time I refresh that page new uproarious laughter erupts!

So, "sandman" posts a 'quote' that "he" keeps editing and adding to...THEN "anonymous one" posts without actually appearing on the page as a user...THEN sandman logs out and "russophile" logs right in and posts....HYSTERICAL...

OH and Oma, THANKS for publicly confirming you have actual NOTICE of Monday's hearing. I've already saved the page and sent the pdf to Roger...Funny that Roger has not heard a peep from "your texas attorney"....who has to announce ready tomorrow at the latest and give Roger notice that he represents you....

RobMoshein said...

THEN russophile logs out and sandman back in to add an ANCIENT picture of Oma from 12 years ago to the alleged quote....

HYSTERICAL to watch her lose it like this...

RobMoshein said...

just proved that "anonymous one" is OMA!!!

Check this. EVERY time Hamou posts as "Oma Hamou" she is logged in as the "invisible" user...who is logged in now...while "anonymous one" posted.

Oma your sick in the head games are really a riot to watch.

RobMoshein said...

THEN I watch the "invisible user" log out and "russophile" back in to post....

Bob Atchison said...

Hey Rob, amazing - you nailed Hamou and her phony sock-puppets - they are all her - you proved it once more!

Blake Springpasture said...

So Hamou misspelled the name of one of her "favorite hotels" in Austin, huh?

Well, she is The Woman Who Sued Herself.

Penelope Autumnvale said...

My dears, you really shouldn't be so hard on Ms. Hamou / McConnell / Moran about misspelling the name of the Driskill.

We all pass nice lodgings from time to time and dream what it would be like to stay there. Who needs to be reminded that one's cheap husband insists that a bed is a bed, and the Motel 6 is just as serviceable to him as the Walderf?

Really, my sweets, can you not cut poor Ms. H/M/M just the teensiest break? As do we all, she has her dreams, too.

RobMoshein said...

Now now Ms P, you know yourself there is a difference between dreams, such as you have, and the DELUSIONS of Hamou....

RobMoshein said...

I heard from Patrick.He
Reported to me that
Some Agent contacted him about FRAUD by Hamou...

Bob Atchison said...

It looks like everything is closing in on Hamou; she must be totally freaking out. Perhaps this will really be the end of her frauds and scams.

Blake Springpasture said...

It's interesting that Patrick heard from the IRS so quickly about their starting an audit.

I wonder if the audit will at some point expand to the activities of Hamou's associate in financial scams, James Sproul.

Bob Atchison said...

I wonder if she has filed any returns for years - do we know if those returns she used in her fraud loan application were really filed?

It's odd that they have those dates on them and just having returns made doesn't mean they were ever filed...

Blake Springpasture said...

The discovery documents contained an electronic filing authorization, and she represented to the mortgage loan company that those returns were actual filed returns.

Even if they weren't filed, she's going to have to explain to the IRS what she did with the loan proceeds from Hamid Refai, which is reportable income if the loan is not repaid (and the judgment he got against her proves she did not). And, of course, she also has to explain the income she claimed in her sworn bankruptcy petition as well as the source of the money she used to purchase Reseda Glass which she claimed to the loan company to have purchased in 2010 and which she claimed was worth $2 million.

In short, to borrow a line from Ricky Ricardo, "Oma, you've got some 'splaining to do."

RobMoshein said...

Oma, you are melting down faster than a Popsicle on a hot sidewalk...

I don't HAVE to prove Refai gave you $50,000. YOU have to prove he didn't! WHY? simple...1. the man has a JUDGMENT AGAINST YOU AND A SIGNED PROMISSORY NOTE WITH YOUR SIGNATURE ON IT
2. YOU SWORE UNDER OATH TO A FEDERAL BANKRUPTCY COURT that the debt owed to Refai was A LEGITIMATE DEBT YOU OWED!!

Are you stupid enough to think a court won't notice that? wait..you probably are....

I'm CERTAIN the IRS is going to want to know about that money... How can you be so certain that Patrick didn't speak with the IRS??

Nobody will show up on Monday for you Oma...Roger still hasn't heard from anyone...and anyone making ANY appearance for you must notify him prior.

More of the same silly baseless threats. Shall I go and find the same quotes from you over the last SIX YEARS?

Why aren't you OUT of Patrick's house yet?? You STILL haven't paid him RENT...

RobMoshein said...

Oma THANKS for admitting you have $50,000 you are willing to spend to sue Bob. This is downloaded copied and will be presented to the JUDGE on Monday as proof that you have assets and are refusing to comply with the COURT ORDERED document production and deposition regarding your assets!!

Judges don't like people who deliberately REFUSE to comply with their orders in Texas....Can't WAIT to see what your "attorney" will have to say when asked about that!

Roger will have the hearing on the record so I can order a transcript!

Blake Springpasture said...

Hmmmm. It seems the call O'Connor got from the IRS Fraud Unit after they received his packet is freaking Hamou out.

I wonder if James Sproul is getting worried that this house purchase scam Hamou tried to pull off against O'Connor is going to end up putting his "business" dealings with Hamou under a microscope.

Sometimes Hamou gets herself so worked up that she starts stumbling all over herself.

She forgets that on and off for months now she has been claiming that Google has provided her with our identities and that the police now know our identities and are going to take immediate action.

She forgets that for years she has been claiming that a lawsuit is imminent.

She forgets that O'Connor has a lawsuit in progress against her and would therefore have any discovery documents that were produced pursuant to a subpoena.

She forgets that we know which lawyers in Austin and Fort Worth have read the Oma Hamou Victims blog in recent days, and we know they have not notified Atchison's attorney of a pending appearance on her behalf.

She forgets that the recent Russophile posts have mysteriously acquired the spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors that have long pervaded posts by "Oma Hamou" and "Snoopy" ...... and that we have seen "Russophile" log on and off in sequence with "Snoopy", "Oma Hamou", "Sandman", and "Anonymous One", all of whom are the now same person.

And she forgets that no jury anywhere will have one whit of patience with her once they hear her history of blowing off court appearances, ignoring judgments, victimizing widows and the elderly, and constantly launching new scams.

And she forgets that when her lies about being on a plane from Boston on 9/11 and her lies about her film company employees being in the World Trade Center surface in front of a jury, the jurors will not only have no patience with her -- they will be very, very angry at her cynical manipulation of true tragedy as a stage prop for her scams.

The notion that any jury anywhere would award her a red cent for her behavior is patently absurd.

Bob Atchison said...

FLASH TWITTER FROM OMA!

Summoning all sock-puppets! I am back online, another flash conclave! Post, post, post my dears!

*****************

WATCH as OMA reanimates your favorite sock-puppet characters!

WONDER as OMA - that master of sock-puppet deception - gleefully posts to and about herself while amazingly pretending to be other people!

LAUGH as OMA signs on as character after character in the blink of an eye! Read and chuckle at the praise and support she creates for herself

- in -

OMA HAMOU SILLY SOCKPUPPET THEATRE!

-

Rebecca Jordan said...

Dear Oma,

Since you and my BFF are so close and all, I am surprised you don't know that she spells her first name "Michele", not "Michelle". Perhaps you can fly her to Austin and stay at the Driscoll.

Rebecca

Blake Springpasture said...

Among her other insanities, Hamou is still posting about the "Driscoll Hotel" being one of her favorite hotels -- even though there is no Driscoll Hotel in Austin or anywhere else.

Does she really think anyone believes she has stayed in a hotel that she liked so much she tweets and posts about it ...... but cannot even spell its name correctly?

Oh, and Hamou ...... I see you've yet again made the recurrent "Snoopy" error of confusing "your" with "you're" in that post in which you also misspelled your good friend Michele Biernat's name.

Do you really not realize that your inability to give a correct rendition of the names of hotels in which you claim to have stayed and of the names of people you say are your friends shows you to be lying?

Perhaps not. You are, after all, The Woman Who Sued Herself.

Blake Springpasture said...

I just compared Hamou's tweet about the hotel in Austin to her post about the same hotel.

Two different attempts to spell it correctly, and she still can't get it right.

Here's a hint, dimbulb. Google it and you'll find the correct spelling in about 0.3 seconds.

You obviously never stayed there, as you would not even have been able to obtain its phone number or use the internet to make a reservation without knowing how to spell its name.

Blake Springpasture said...

Hamou posted:

"if you must know it was the FBI who told me several of the IP's trace back to Austin, Texas not New York or some other place but to one computer. This information along with the name of the Special Agent will be produced during the discovery phase of my civil lawsuit involving you and Bob."

How do we know Hamou is lying? Because Rob and Bob know what is coming from their computers and what is not.

And how else do we know Hamou is lying about what "law enforcement" tells her? Because no one here has ever made any calls regarding her to anyone using Skype, despite her claims that "law enforcement" has tracked the calls on Skype.

All these claims about what law enforcement supposedly tells her are bogus. Sometimes she's just fishing for information. Sometimes she is trying to lend gravitas to her claims of being supported by law enforcement. But always she is lying.

This notion that she can intimidate us with these claims -- knowing that we know what we did and did not do -- is akin to a three-year-old covering her eyes and thinking that, because she can see nothing, no one can find her in hide-and-seek.

Blake Springpasture said...

Well, I see Hamou finally googled the Driskill hotel and found out how to spell it.

Found its street address, too.

About time.

Blake Springpasture said...

Yeah, right.

We'll see a Driskill Hotel receipt in the name of Oma Hamou just as we saw an electricity bill in the name of Alexandra McConnell.

Not.

Rebecca Jordan said...

As hilarious as Oma's poor use of sock puppets is (honestly, girlfriend, will you try and learn how to spell "you're"? Or the proper use of homonyms?), it is even funnier to get her daily takes on the legal system. She seems to think that the courts exist to service the personal needs of Oma Hamou. Why on earth do you think that a properly constituted court in Texas, dealing with a Texan matter, is simply going to roll over and play dead because you think you need a do-over in California? You're not playing hop-scotch here, girl.

As for the rest of it, if your landlord has indeed taken your files to the IRS, you're (see how it works?) in a heap o'trouble. I would be more concerned about that, Oma.

Oh. And your book deal, of course. Has the Hallmark Channel optioned And Then They Googled My Name yet? Who's playing you? Or . . .dare we hope . . . will you be playing yourself!

Dust off the tiara and drag queen outfit, folks, she's ready for her closeup, Mr. DeMille!

Rebecca

RobMoshein said...

Hi Oma,

Once again, I can prove how much you lie and spew your lies to be the truth. The entire time last night Blake was posting, and you were screaming that it was "Rob"...I was busy elsewhere.

At the DRISKILL HOTEL in fact!
At this event:
http://www.driskillhotel.com/images/mcc/events/Sara-Moulton-Celebrity-Dinner.jpg

Trust me, I was far too busy to give a rat's ass about you and YOUR Rat's ass, and was at a table full of people and chatting with Sara Moulton. A couple of dozen folks will gladly attest that I was not busy on my iPhone all night reading and typing away. In fact I only had the thing out to check in on Twitter and Facebook when I first sat down, and take a couple of pictures. Shall I scan and post the menu Sara autographed for me? Glad to do it...

OH, and one more reason to know that you PRETEND to be a regular at the Driskill? The street address is on Brazos, but EVERYONE in town knows the main entrance is on 6th St and everyone always refers to the Driskill on 6th...I'm really good friends now with a couple of directors of the hotel, shall I have them confirm you've been a guest? Give me permission and I will be happy to do so.

Patrick wanted me to remind you that the IRS has not yet OPENED the investigation officially, they are still compiling the case against you, so they can't have possibly confirmed you are NOT under investigation yet...oopsie...

Have a great day.

Blake Springpasture said...

Hamou posted:

"This is not proof I am refusing to comply, that's what makes you look like an idiot."

No, Oma. The proof that you are refusing to comply is that you DID NOT COMPLY with the court's order by the deadline the court mandated.

That is all the proof the court will need on Monday. All this claptrap about some other lawsuits you are going to file in California are utterly irrelevant to the court in Texas.

And no lawyer is going to make a "special appearance" for you on Monday. Some hack lawyer may show up to try to make some lame excuse for why you missed the deadline and to try to buy you more time. But there is not a damned thing you or any lawyer can do to cause the court to relinquish jurisdiction or to rescind the discovery order. That die was cast when you lost your right to appeal and when you again put yourself under the jurisdiction of Texas courts by filing that inane Bill of Review.

What all your posts taunting Bob Atchison to come to California if he wants to enforce his judgment will show the court is not that you did not comply (as the court already knows that). They will show the court that you have no intention of complying with the order.

Mitzi said...

Darling Blakele,

So cogent, darling!

Mitzi

Bob Atchison said...

Blake,

Hamou agreed in court to the video deposition and document production. She promised the judge she would do it. In fact she promised three judges she would.

Each time she agreed only to get out of the courtroom, to avoid immediate danger. She knew she would never fulfill her promises, she knew she would never obey the judges and the Texas Courts.

It was all just a trick, a tactic, just lies.

I know because I was there.

Remember her tricky 'promise' - which was a lie - to pay her judgment to me on March 24th? This happened in court as well - with the judge right there. More deception, more lies.

Hamou cannot be trusted to tell the truth about anything, even the smallest things.

RobMoshein said...

FACT:
Oma Hamou was subpoenaed to attend a Deposition and REFUSED to attend.

FACT: Oma Hamou was ORDERED by a Court to COMPLY with the Subpoena and document production within 45 days and
FACT: Oma Hamou FAILED to comply with Said Court Order.

FACT: Judge SHULAK TOLD HAMOU SHE HAD TO COMPLY...Judge Harger ORDERED HAMOU TO COMPLY, Judge YELENOVSKY TOLD HAMOU SHE HAD TO COMPLY, JUDGE COOPER TOLD HAMOU SHE HAD TO COMPLY..

FACT: HAMOU FAILED TO COMPLY.

FACT: Hamou posts she will continue to refuse to comply and shows she would rather litigate further than comply with Court Orders.

THIS is what Roger will bring to the Judge's attention on Monday. ANYTHING her pretend lawyer might say will only PROVE her intention is to stall and refuse to comply.

I smell a bench warrant.

RobMoshein said...

How do we know that Hamou LIES?

She types...LOL

for example:
FBI says the accounts created on your libelous blog the Rob Moshein Speaks Out almost all of those IPs orignate from one computer in Austin, Texas. One computer. :P

One: I know for a stone cold fact that Blake, Rebecca, Mitzi and Ms P ALL post from OUTSIDE THE STATE OF TEXAS! THE FBI can NOT ACCESS THESE RECORDS FROM GOOGLE UNDER FEDERAL LAW WITHOUT FIRST GETTING A COURT ORDER AND GIVING ME PRIOR NOTICE!!!

SECONDLY, there are far more than ONE computer in this house.

Also Oma, you STILL can't get information correct about the entrances to the Driskill!

Jealous of YOU? hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehhehe.....gasp....

RobMoshein said...

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahaahahahahahahahahahaheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheh*gasp*hahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahhaahaa

RobMoshein said...

hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

*gasp*
hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahaha
hehehehehehehehehe

«Oldest ‹Older   1 – 200 of 263   Newer› Newest»