As law enforcement seems unable to assist me, and in fact unable to assist any of those she victimizes, and as the person behind this campaign to defame me and interfere with my business and profession, she uses many alias names: Oma Hamou, Oma Mcconnell or Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Moran, is what they call "judgment proof" meaning she has no money, I must place this blog here.
I would NOT even have written here, had this person not continually written her own false and defamatory statements herself and aided and abetted other personae writing "on her behalf" for the last three years. If she doesn't want me to say anything about her, she ought not have been continually blogging and writing about me much less aiding and encouraging others to do so as well.
The woman behind all of this goes by many names: Oma Hamou, Oma McConnell, Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Hamou, Alexandra Moran, Oma Demian, Alexandra Murphy, are the usual ones, but there are others. She uses a business name of "Enigma Royal Films, LLC" she also calls just "Enigma Films" and "Reseda Glass" and "Worldwide Construction Enterprises, Inc.". The reason this woman and her "alleged", actually made up, friends crusade to destroy me is simple. I learned about her genuine background, and she wants me silenced from speaking about it.
This woman admits that her actions are all motivated by her bitterness and hatred towards me, and this is the reason for her actions.
This woman, Oma Hamou, Oma McConnell, Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Hamou, Oma Demian, Alexandra Murphy and her other aliases have a twenty year track record of FELONY CONVICTIONS, multiple arrests, failure to abide by the requirements of her probation for her felony convictions which lead to more arrests, many many civil judgments against her for hundreds of thousands of dollars, a history of writing bad checks, and she was arrested late in 2008 in San Bernardino California on a Felony Charge of Forgery of a Financial Instrument (she seems to have forged a large check) After 14 months of dragging the process out, she paid the Victim full restitution and the District Attorney dropped the Felony charge. She has a history of evictions and bad checks.
A complete dossier has been posted, with the details on her activities, notably passing bad checks, stiffing landlords for rent owed and trashing the houses she rents by reason of keeping literally dozens of cats and dogs and not cleaning up after them. Not to mention numerous unpaid judgments against her.
That blog is here.
This woman also has a recent default Judgment against her in Los Angeles County, in the amount of $55,000 which is admitted under oath was owing in her Bankruptcy Petition:
Case Number: MC020860 HAMID REFAI VS ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL, JIM SPROUL, ET AL
Filing Date: 09/23/2009
According to the case, Mr. Refai, a married man, was "involved" with Alexandra McConnell, she kept telling him about serious "medical problems" and asking for "loans" for medical bills in the total amount of $51,000. This was confirmed by the fact that a woman who used to live in her house wrote on the internet THREE MONTHS before the suit was filed: "I lived with this lady, she is no good. SHE LIES. SHE HAS LIKE 50 CATS LIVING WITH HER AND HER HOUSE SMELLS LIKE SHIT AND CAT SPRAY AND PISS. She is dirty, filthy and uses old men for money I SEEN IT MYSELF. By the way Hamid's wife knows it was LIPOSUCTION you drained their bank account for, not cancer in your asshole. He had her sign a promissory note, co signed by long time co-conspirator Jim Sproul. She of course never PAID back the money. She, of course, never showed up in Court.
Here is the Final Judgment against Alexandra McConnell aka Oma Hamou and her "longtime friend" Jim Sproul:
Mr. Refai is pressing the collection of this Judgment and recently ordered a Debtor's Exam of Hamou aka Alexandra McConnell. The Court ordered a $10,000 bond must be posted by Hamou to compel her appearance.
OMA HAMOU AKA ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL SCAMS:
The following have agreed to speak with law enforcement or potential landlords about their experiences and the Felony Forgery charge against this woman, in the hopes that others will not fall prey to her in the future.
2008. SHARLANE CHIPI. Represented by Attorney LAURENCE H. LISHNER filed Unlawful Detainer (EVICTION) against her tenant Oma McConnell Case Number: 08U03169
CHIPI, CHARLANE (sic)VS. MCCONNELL, OMA
Sharlane Cecilia Chipi. She lives in Torrance, and her phone number is available upon request.
In 2008 Ms. Chipi was seeking a short sale of her home. A realtor named Kevin Davies (phone available upon request) introduced Oma McConnell to Ms. Chipi, claiming she had loan approval to purchase the house but that McConnell wanted to move in as a renter prior to closing the sale. (This was exactly the scenario she used to gain occupancy at Mr. O'Connor's house in Littlerock.) Ms. Chipi agreed.
The first rental check was written on a closed account. No further rental payments were made. McConnell moved in with her son and another man. The house was thoroughly trashed. Numerous animals were kept in one room which was badly damaged. Carpeting was ripped out. Appliances were removed. The kitchen caught fire.
Ms. Chipi sought help from the Sheriff's department which told her that they could do nothing without an eviction order. Ms. Chipi filed a U.D. (Case No. 08U03169 - Michael Antonovich Antelope Valley Courthouse), which she later dropped due to lack of resources. She said that Kevin Davies also filed an action against McConnell and that she failed to show for the hearing.
Ms. Chipi says she has some files on the incident, as does Mr. Davies, and that she also has undeveloped film of the damage done to the house.
Robert Atchison
Won a Civil Judgment against Oma Hamou for her failure to pay him consulting fees as she promised him she would do.
Mr. Atchison is proceeding with Post Judgment Document Production demands from Oma Hamou. A District Court Judge has signed an order requiring her to schedule and appear at a deposition in Austin Texas no later than September 3 to disclose her assets, finances, and employment information, and she is further ORDERED to comply by providing the requested financial, employment and asset documentation to Mr. Atchison no later than August 20. She did nothing. Her failure to do these things resulted in an order of Contempt of Court.
August 2011: Hamou/McConnell tried to derail Mr. Atchison's debt collection with a last moment filing of a "Bill of Review". Hamou's Bill of Review was dismissed on July 26, 2011 by the Hon Judge Cooper of the District Court. Hamou now has no choice but to comply with the Court order.
OCTOBER 18:
The Court slapped Oma Hamou with an Order of Contempt of Court and imposed $1,000 sanctions against her for failing to comply with the Ordered Document Production and Deposition.
January 2012: District Court Lora Livingston Slapped an ORDER TO APPEAR AND SHOW CAUSE on Oma Hamou requiring her to appear in Person to explain her continuing violation of Court Orders. Her failure to appear will most likely result in a Bench Warrant for her Arrest:
Hamou failed to appear as ordered by the Court. As a result, a BENCH WARRANT for her arrest was issued on March 26, 2012 by the same Judge Livingston in the Travis County District Court
Hamou attempted in June 2012 to ask the Court to vacate the Bench Warrant, but it seems her "Paralegal" one Robert Richman (a Tai Chi master and Torah Scholar, as well as "Paralegal") seems to have chickened out on continuing.
In 2012 "Oma McConnell" filed for Bankruptcy in order to forestall debtor's exams and collection efforts. She failed to file any required schedules or information, despite Court orders to do so. Her Bankruptcy was dismissed for that failure. However, On August 20, 2012 Judge Robles of the US Federal Bankruptcy Court ordered her Bankruptcy proceedings to be re-instated and ordered her to comply with Document Production requests and Deposition by attorneys for Bob Atchison, which are now scheduled for late September. Hamou/McConnell FAILED TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT ORDERED DOCUMENT PRODUCTION REQUIRED NO LATER THAN SEPTEMBER 14, 2012. She further FAILED TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT ORDER THAT SHE APPEAR FOR A DEPOSITION ON SEPTEMBER 20, 2012. She can now be held in Contempt of Court.
October 31, 2012, the Bankruptcy Court dismissed Oma McConnell's bankruptcy due to her utter failure to file even one single required schedule or document. Judge Ernesto Robles said her creditors "are free to pursue their State claims against her".
Eric Cowan
Landlord in 2010. Bad checks and trashed house. Rented from him as "Alexandra McConnell" but presented an expired California Driver's License in the name of Oma Hamou.
661-947-2079
Thomas Ward
Attorney for Hamid Refai (victim of a scam who loaned Alexandra McConnell $50,000, for "cancer treatments" actually used by Alexandra McConnellto pay the Victim Restitution in the Felony Forgery case in Victorville, never repaid). Los Angeles Superior Court Case Number: MC020860 HAMID REFAI VS ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL, ET AL
Mr. Ward's telephone number for details: 661-948-5021
Nancy's Reseda Screen & Glass
Has information about people looking for Jim Sproul and Oma Hamou about numerous bad checks and missing cars
818-708-2981
Bryan Stodghill
Prosecutor in Victorville,San Bernardino County Felony Forgery Case where Alexandra McConnell wrote a check in 2009 on a closed account to the landlord, and in his words "She basically destroyed the house." He states that he would have taken her to trial on the charge had she not paid full Victim Restitution to the Landlord for the bad check and damages to the house.
760-243-8600
Patrick J. O'Connor
Homeowner in Littlerock California who was selling his house using the services of Shari Porter agent with Big Valley Realty in Palmdale California. Shari Porter brought "Alexandra Moran" using an expired drivers license in the name of Oma Hamou to Mr. O'Connor as a "Qualified Buyer" of his home. Shari Porter insisted Oma Hamou be allowed to rent part of the home as a room mate of Mr. O'Connor until the sale closed. Porter kept informing Mr. O'Connor that Hamou was pre-qualified by lenders, yet never actually provided the required documentation proving this to O'Connor. Shari Porter told O'Connor that Hamou had deposited funds into escrow at Titan Escrow in Palmdale, but again refused to give O'Connor any actual escrow documents. Hamou delayed closing for a full five months, then refused to close when O'Connor demanded. She further refused to leave the property and now squats in the residence with four men, another woman and four or five children and literally ten or twelve dogs and forty to fifty cats. She has moved an old trailer and cargo boxes onto the property as well.
pjoinak@yahoo.com (I also have Mr. O'Connor's cell phone number should anyone wish to speak with him directly)
She uses 145 South Glenoaks Burbank, CA as her "legal address". However this address is actually FEDEX Burbank and is nothing more than a mail drop.
OMA HAMOU/AKA OMA MCCONNELL, ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL, ALEXANDRA MORAN EVICTION HISTORY:
Filing Date: 09/22/2008. CHIPI CHARLANE. Represented by Attorney LAURENCE H. LISHNER filed Unlawful Detainer (EVICTION) against her tenant Oma McConnell Case Number: 08U03169
CHIPI, CHARLANE VS. MCCONNELL, OMA
2009 Alexandra McConnell wrote a check in 2009 on a closed account to the landlord Huiku Batchelor. Felony Fraud charges pressed and Hamou aka McConnell evicted after being incarcerated in jail. In the proscuter's words: in his words "She basically destroyed the house."
2010: "Alexandra McConnell" rented from Eric Cowan, but presented an expired California Driver's License in the name of Oma Hamou. Hamou/McConnell gave Cowan bad checks for rent and Cowan filed unlawful detainer/eviction and got her out of his house. Cowan, Eric vs. Hamou, Oma (Michael Antonovich Antelope Valley Courthouse, Case No. 10U01290). Erik Cowan will confirm 661-947-2079
2011 "Alexandra Moran" rented a room from Patrick J. O'Connor, but presented an expired California Drivers License in the name of Oma Hamou. She then claimed to want to purchase the property. She delayed the purchase for FIVE MONTHS with numerous stories, and is now squatting on the property without permission nor paying rent . She lives there with her son, Nicholas Royal Moran, who has severe psychiatric disorders (his is currently under Conservatorship pursuant to the California Lanterman Petris Short Act) and has a history of violence, both domestic and with police. Mr. O'Connor himself witnessed Nicholas Moran beat his mother in front of him in the residence. She also lives with one Steve Fred Lee, who has over 15 criminal convictions for eluding police, indecent exposure and habitual driving with a revoked drivers license. Another squatter on the property is one Michael McBride who lives with four or five of his children also on the property. Hamou also has literally many dozens of cats and more than 10 dogs on the property. Hamou attempted to keep Mr. O'Connor from evicting her by filing a Restraining Order against Mr. O'Connor alleging he made threats of violence against her and her son. However, she did NOT file this order until a full TWO WEEKS after Mr. O'Connor left the residence and moved to Alaska! Hearing on the requested Restraining order was held Friday July 15. Hamou first requested a continuance! The Judge refused to delay the hearing. After the Judge examined her criminal record, arrest record and history of evictions and Judgments, the Judge in so many words called Hamou "a Criminal and Con Artist" recognized her string of VICTIMS and refused to grant the restraining order, and further told Hamou that while he could not order her out at the moment, she did have to leave O'Connor's property and pay him the rent owed. Hamou told O'Connor by email she will be out by September 1. Mr. O'Connor's attorney has begun Eviction Proceedings against Hamou McConnell and her other squatters. While Hamou wrote Mr. O'Connor that she would be "out of the house by September 1" she has hired a lawyer to delay the eviction proceedings. Reports indicate that the house is trashed, with old furniture in the yard, many old rusted trucks, tires, boxes and piles of trash are strewn across the property.
A Health Department Complaint about the property was filed on February 16, 2012 by the neighbors to this property complaining of "Accumulation of refuse and cast off materials" and "Accumulation of Animal Excrement" which Hamou has allowed on the property.
A Health Department Complaint about the property she currently squats in without paying rent was filed on February 16, 2012 by the neighbors to this property complaining of "Accumulation of refuse and cast off materials" and "Accumulation of Animal Excrement" which Hamou has allowed on the property.
On March 7, 2012, the County of Los Angeles Department of Health Services issued her a CITATION FOR HEALTH CODE VIOLATIONS No. 300055 for accumulation of trash, debris and animal droppings on the property.
Mr. O'Connor filed an Unlawful Detainer Action in Los Angeles Superior Court, Case 11U2065 to evict Hamou.
Patrick J. O'Connor will confirm and is anxious to discuss his Experiences with Oma Hamou aka Alexandra McConnell aka Oma Mc Connell aka Alexandra Moran. pjoinak@yahoo.com
She also has a history of failing to pay her attorneys. The following law firms have judgments against her and/or are owed money by this woman:
Freeman Freeman & Smiley in Los Angeles $10,000
Westar Legal Services in Los Angeles, $10,000
Foster Malish LLC in Austin Texas $20,000
Suzanne Curtis in Los Angeles $1,000
2011 "Alexandra Moran" rented a room from Patrick J. O'Connor, but presented an expired California Drivers License in the name of Oma Hamou. She then claimed to want to purchase the property. She delayed the purchase for FIVE MONTHS with numerous stories, and is now squatting on the property without permission nor paying rent Mr. O'Connor has retained an attorney and legal action is pending for yet ANOTHER EVICTION. Patrick J. O'Connor will confirm. pjoinak@yahoo.com
NEW INFORMATION IN THIS MATTER JUNE 25, 2011:
Published on the web by Oma Hamou herself:
From: sarskaia@aol.com
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:18:25 -0400 (EDT)
To:
Subject: Re: The Motorcycle
Mr. O'Connor,
I will not be arrested for the motorcycle as you left it here because I was going to buy it. If you no longer want to sell it to me, I have no problems giving it to Ralph. He must contact me and arrange a time and the day with me so that we can coordinate our schedules. He or no other friend of yours can just show up and expect to gain access.
She admits here that she doesn't OWN the motorcycle and admits Mr. O'Connor wants his bike BACK.
So what does "Alexandra McConnell" aka Oma Hamou aka Alexandra Moran do??
She SELLS THE MOTORCYCLE to one "Craig" for $4,500!!
"Craig" gets suspicious because "Alexandra" can't produce the title (which of course Mr. O'Connor still had) and would only give him a handwritten bill of sale (a copy of which I have in my possession now). The Los Angeles County Sheriffs were involved YET AGAIN with her and her various names to safely return the motorcycle to Mr. O'Connor!
Selling property that she admits isn't HERS to sell legally! Isn't that "grand theft"??
Also, taking money for property you do not own nor have title to by claiming it is yours to sell is "THEFT BY DECEPTION" a felony crime for which she has been convicted three times in the past.
Someone else has recently posted a precis of the criminal and debt history of this woman. You can go here to read the specific details for yourself:
http://www.omahamoureality.blogspot.com
I have put up a precis of the specific information for her victims and law enforcement here: http://OmaHamouVictims.blogspot.com
You are encouraged to share information you may have about her and her activities with me.
OMA HAMOU AKA ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL BAD CHECK HISTORY:
07/22/2010 `NSF` CHECK WRITTEN BY OMA HAMOU WAS RECEIVED BY THE LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT FOR FILING FEES AND MOTION FEE , (HAMOU, OMA) AKA(MCCONNELL, ALEXANDRA) AKA (DEMIAN, OME) AKA (ASHKENAZY, OMA) AKA (HAMOU, ALEXANDRA) AKA(CHEDID, OMA) AKA (JORDAN, REBECCA) AKA (TAYLOR, JORDAN) AKA (ABRAMOV, OMA) NOTIFIED BY MAIL PER SECTION C.C.P. 411.20. PAYMENT DUE BY 08/16/10 , IN THE SUM OF $ 310.00 . Proof is here in the case record: Cowan, Eric vs. Hamou, Oma (Michael Antonovich Antelope Valley Courthouse, Case No. 10U01290)
EARLY 2010 ERIK COWAN RECEIVED SEVERAL CHECKS FROM ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL/OMA HAMOU FOR RENT DUE ON PROPERTY HE OWNED. CHECKS WHERE BOTH NSF AND ON A CLOSED FLORIDA ACCOUNT BELONGING TO RESEDA SCREEN & GLASS. OMA HAMOU IS EVICTED FROM THE PROPERTY AS A RESULT. Cowan, Eric vs. Hamou, Oma (Michael Antonovich Antelope Valley Courthouse, Case No. 10U01290). Erik Cowan will confirm 661-947-2079
OCTOBER 2008 MRS. HUIKU BATCHELOR IS WRITTEN A CHECK FOR RENT BY ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL ON A CLOSED ACCOUNT IN THE NAME OF OMA HAMOU. THIS CHECK IS PROSECUTED AS FELONY FORGERY BY THE SAN BERNARDINO DISTRICT ATTORNEY. Case No. FVI802540 . District Attorney Bryan Stodghill will confirm. 760-243-8600
2004 OMA HAMOU ISSUES CHECKS ON A CLOSED ACCOUNT TO THE FOLLOWING PERSONS IN IRVINE CALIFORNIA:
ONE TO MONIQUE HAHN,
ONE TO WILD WEST MEDIA (17522 Von Karman Ave. Irvine, CA. 92614) ,
ONE TO RICH SCHAEFER.
-Police investigation into these bad checks was opened by the Irvine Police Department.
June 25, 1991 – Oma Demian (NOW OMA HAMOU) is arrested in the State of Utah for NSF Check November 7,1991 "Oma McConnell" (aka Oma Demian) was convicted in the State of Utah, Park City District Court, Utah Administrative Office of the Courts case number 2218-911613381, of the 2nd degree Felony crime of "Theft By Deception" in violation of Utah Criminal Statue 76-6-405, and a disposition of "Guilty" has been entered in that Court for this crime.
NSF CHECKS IN THIS CASE WERE WRITTEN TO
JUPITER PROPERTY MANAGEMENT/DIANE APT $5,000
FIRST SECURITY BANK $4,500
NSF Checks written by Oma Demian (now Hamou) in Wyoming to:
KMart, 12/14/90 $437.95
United Airlines 12/17/90 $3,456.00
JANUARY 24, 1992 OMA DEMIAN (NOW OMA HAMOU) CONVICTED IN YELLOWSTONE COUNTY MONTANA FOR FELONY OF ISSUING A BAD CHECK COMMON SCHEME, SENTENCED TO TEN YEARS PROBATION.
April 1, 1992: Oma Demian NOW OMA HAMOU AKA ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL convicted of the Felony offense of Issuing a bad check over $150 was sentenced to 120 months in Prison, sentence suspended. Case 91-103, in Billings,Yellowstone County Montana, for the fraudulent checks issued in 1991.
She is nearly psychotic in her daily compulsion because I stumbled onto these actual facts of her past, and present, which do not coincide with the personae she wants to project to others.
This woman, Oma Hamou, Oma McConnell, Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Hamou, Oma Demian, Alexandra Murphy et al, has for YEARS now, threatened me with civil and criminal actions. For years now, NOTHING has happened except more ongoing threats online.
I am called a "criminal stalker". First, being called a criminal is Libel per se in Texas, since I have never been convicted of ANYTHING worse than one speeding ticket. As for a stalker, well, I have no clue where this woman is, where she lives, and frankly I don't WANT to know, nor can I care less. In the words of one of her attorney's, Dave. S. "the faster that woman is in my rearview mirror the happier I'll be" (yeah I have the email he said that to me in.). I WISH NO CONTACT WITH OR FROM THIS PERSON.
I do NOT wish this person ill, or harm. Frankly, I do not care about her. The less I hear about her, the better. That said, no one should ever be subjected to harm or danger. I DO NOT WISH THIS PERSON HARM, nor have I advocated, wished, nor advised anyone to harm her. Such allegations are baseless, wrong and defamatory. I just want he to leave me and my partner ALONE and stop the thousands of pages of defamatory lies she puts up and allows "friends" to post on her website in order to cause me harm.
OMA HAMOU BUSINESS ENTITY: "ENIGMA ROYAL FILMS, LLC."
Hamou has reactivated a dormant LLC, Enigma Royal Films. BEWARE however, that the "agent" for service of process is LONG out of date. Shari Leinwand with Gibson, Dunn NO LONGER SERVES AS AGENT. Oma Hamou aka Alexandra McConnell aka Oma McConnell is the TRUE agent for service of process. As an active LLC, there are large debts this LLC owes:
10/24/2002 Writ of Execution Issued (LOS ANGELES COUNTY, ENIGMA ROYAL FILMS,LLC, $82,012.56 ) by American Express. Case Number: PC027665 AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SER. CO. VS. ENIGMA ROYAL
02/07/2006 JUDGMENT ENTERED AS A FINAL DISPOSITION ON 02/07/06 . FOR (CURTIS, SUZANNE M) ATTORNEY AT LAW . AGAINST (HAMOU, OMA) , (ENIGMA ROYAL FILMS, LLC) Case Number: 05V09066 CURTIS, SUZANNE M VS. HAMOU, OMA
WORLD WIDE CONSTRUCTION ENTERPRISES, INC. was formed on 2009-10-30 in California by OMA HAMOU located at 22815 VENTURA BLVD STE 891, WOODLAND HILLS CA 91364 .
Universal ID CA-C3114859
Name WORLD WIDE CONSTRUCTION ENTERPRISES, INC.
Registration Number C3114859
Type CORP
Status CANCELED
Address 22815 VENTURA BLVD STE 891, WOODLAND HILLS CA 91364
Formation Date 2009-10-30
REGISTERED AGENT Name OMA HAMOU
Address 22815 VENTURA BLVD #891, WOODLAND HILLS CA 91364
OMA HAMOU AKA ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL BANKRUPTCY DISCREPENCIES AND TAX RECORD DISCREPENCIES:
Oma Hamou Alexandra McConnell filed for Bankruptcy with the Federal Court earlier in 2010. Here is her Bankruptcy Petition, this is the entire PDF file of 2mb, which is public record from the Court. She also filed tax returns with her lender trying to get a loan to purchase the O'Connor house. Comparing the two shows glaring discrepancies and untruths.
—Omission of Assets on Bankruptcy Petition and Schedules is considered A False Statement Under Penalty of Perjury, 18 U.S.C. § 152(3):
Oma Hamou owns two business entities, Enigma Films, Inc., and The Sarskaia Foundation plus Enigma Royal Films, LLC. Further, Oma Hamou owns and operates a website at www.OmaHamou.com, where she and alleged friends post information about her. Interestingly, Ms Hamou lists her own company, Enigma Films as her employer. The clear inference is that Enigma Films earns money with which to pay her as an employee. Yet, there is no declaration or disclosure of her ownership of these companies, nor disclosure of the value of these assets she owns.
HOWEVER: Her 2010 Tax Return states that she PURCHASED "Reseda Glass" in April 2010, three full months before the Bankruptcy filing.
Notice here in her Loan Application she lists $145,000 CASH as an asset, yet, she FAILS to identify exactly WHERE that cash is.
The Refai Judgment was just the previous year, yet she FAILED to disclose that to the lender. She lists small old debts, some as long ago as ten years, BUT FAILS TO DISCLOSE A SINGLE DEBT SHE LISTS ON THE BANKRUPTCY PETITION, JUST SIX MONTHS EARLIER. Interestingly, she doesn't list a SINGLE one of the debts on her Loan Application on her Bankruptcy Petition either!see below
Hamou received in excess of $50,000 in cash from Mr. Refai in May 2009, (see above) for which she signed a promissory note. Hamou made no disclosure of the whereabouts of this large sum of cash, nor did she disclose just where this substantial asset went. She FAILED to mention it to her lender as well...
Her 2010 IRS returns show "income" of $38,000 or $2,459 per month. She claims a "sole proprietorship" called "Reseda Glass" that "installs glass in high rise buildings" but has NO Federal Employer ID number, nor does she list any WAGES paid to any "employees". Is this almost 50 year old woman hanging off the side of a building installing glass ALL BY herself?
Her 2009 IRS Return, filed the same day (April 2011) swears that she was self employed earning $2,130 per month.
HOWEVER, her Bankruptcy Petition shows she claimed to have been employed for TEN YEARS by "Enigma Films and Glass Tech" earning $3,000 per month.
HOWEVER in, her LOAN APPLICATION Section IV "Employment Information" she wrote that "Reseda Glass" at the same address as her "residence", which is just actually a mail drop at a Fedex Office store, was her employer for TWO YEARS, and she earned $2459 per month.
—Omission of Assets on Bankruptcy Petition and Schedules is considered A False Statement Under Penalty of Perjury, 18 U.S.C. § 152(3).
Hamou McConnell Moran claims of violence, rape and cancer...
In 2002, she wrote to a Russian Orthodox Priest
Your Eminence: I am writing to you to ask you to remember me in your prayers- 2 weeks ago I underwent surgery to remove cancer from my colon and I have 100 stitches inside of me. The physicians told me yesterday that my white blood count is high and that I have 2 choices chemotherapy or another surgery as they fear that it is spread in my uterus. I am scared. I am a single mother and I work hard and now my life...my health is not good. I have been in the hospital and now I may have another surgery this week. Some things are worth more than money-
June 2007: Her ex husband confirms Oma Hamou was still claiming cancer:
I herd this from my daughter ...Anyway...according to (my daughter) that is the case...she has cancer and has fulfilled her name of Oma which means cancer in Latin.
May 11, 2009 "Alexandra McConnell" signs a promissory note borrowing $50,000 from Hamid Refai, Mr. Refai confirms, through his attorney Thomas Ward that "Alexandra McConnell" borrowed this money to pay for "cancer treatments"
This is further confirmed by an email from a former roommate who wrote on July 8, 2009: By the way Hamid's wife knows it was LIPOSUCTION you drained their bank account for, not cancer in your asshole.
August 23, 2010 on her website: yes she is still undergoing treatment for her cancer. I can definitely attest to the fact that she has indeed suffered from cancer. Those treatments are so hard on her that I have had to help her back to the car, then into her house and even into bed because they leave her so sick and weak that she cannot do anything.
Ask yourself if the following make any, rational or reasonable common sense:
This woman claims to be an actress and model, but for a decade steadfastly REFUSES to provide one single shred of evidence to support the allegation, not even a credit, reference or magazine issue. She says only "I was and I don't have to prove it. YOU have to prove I wasn't". Does that make sense?
This woman claims that her three felony convictions were not Her fault, but rather someone else's fault. Does THAT make sense?
This woman claims that her recent Felony Forgery Charges in San Bernardino are "just a big mistake" and "law enforcement and the DA" are on "her side" and "believe her", yet they STILL pressed charges and scheduling dozens of hearings over FOURTEEN MONTHS. Does THAT make sense??
This woman has claimed for six years non stop that I am being investigated by law enforcement and the FBI. Yet, NOTHING ever happened, I have never been contacted by law enforcement for any reason in those six years other than one speeding ticket. Does it make any sense to you that law enforcement is doing ANYTHING for six years now?
Buddha said Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense.
Look at all the blathering posts she has put up on the internet, and ask yourself, do these things agree with YOUR reason and your own common sense? The answer is obvious.
As you can see, this woman and/or her cronies now LIE, falsify documents and use years old private letters to attempt to defame and disparage me, and Bob Atchison
Many people whom have come into contact with her call her a con artist and scam artist. She hangs out with convicted felons, even inviting these career criminals to live in her house with her.
You can verify all the arrests, judgments, evictions, etc for yourself with simple online searches.
You are free to email me with your questions, Rob@AustinWineGuy.com, and if you yourself have been a VICTIM of this woman Oma Hamou, Oma McConnell, Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Hamou, Oma Demian, Alexandra Murphy and her NEWEST Alexandra Moran, I encourage you to contact me.
205 comments:
1 – 200 of 205 Newer› Newest»Fresh clean, new updated blog. Carry on with comments here!
Silly Oma, of COURSE the Court will tell you nobody was there on May 26. The Bench warrant order was SIGNED BY LITTLE SHANE ALREADY ON FEBRUARY 23, pursuant to Judge Livingston's ORDERS!The moment you failed to show up on in March all the Judge had to do was sign it herself. She had already ordered it to issue and Shane didn't oppose. You were given an extra 30 days to appear as a courtesy by the Judge. You didn't....
There was NO HEARING on May 26...of any kind.
Also, the case number you posted won't show up anything in the Court system anymore. So I know you didn't actually call. That is the OLD case number, which was changed several years ago to a different one when they went to a new computer system
Hamou posted:
"ask them if on May 26th, 2012 WHO was present at that hearing when Bob Atchison and His Attorney presented a Motion to the Court asking it to issue a civil bench warrant for Oma's arrest, the court will tell you the only ATTORNEY present was Bob Atchison's attorney."
The bench warrant was issued in March 2012, and there were no proceedings in the case after that.
I seriously doubt if the court clerk confirmed to Hamou the presence of Bob Atchison's attorney on this matter on May 26.
And, of course, as Rob Moshein made clear, the bench warrant was already in the works before Hamou filed her bankruptcy petition.
A warrant issued by a court for contempt is a proceeding between the court and the person in contempt. While third parties may appear (as did Atchison through his attorney), they are not litigants in the issue of the bench warrant, as it is the powers of the court that are in issue, not the rights or claims of a private litigant.
And, as bankruptcy stays cannot be imposed on courts but only on creditors, the court was free to issue the bench warrant after the filing of the bankruptcy petition. In fact, there was no obligation at all on Atchison or his attorney to inform the judge about the bankruptcy petition as it related to the bench warrant. That was the job of Hamou and her attorney.
Of course this is both too complicated for Hamou to digest and too inconvenient for her to acknowledge.
So the Woman Who Sued Herself rides over the cliff again.
Well, I see that the Woman Who Sued Herself has opened up another can of worms for herself.
She is throwing one of her hare-brained legal briefs over the transom at Judge Livingston, apparently unaware that she has now opened the door to Judge Livingston's hearing all about her commission of bankruptcy fraud -- something which Atchison and his lawyer will have to get into with the good judge.
One of the four types of bankruptcy fraud is concealment of assets. Per one legal source, "this type of fraud occurs when a person purposely fails to list every one of his assets on his bankruptcy claim". Per another legal source, "concealment of assets is the most common type of bankruptcy fraud. This type of fraud occurs when the debtor hides his assets during the declaration phase of the bankruptcy process."
I guess Judge Livingston is going to have to hear all about Hamou's filing of a petition without any of the required accompanying schedules -- including her list of assets -- as well as her blowing off the court's repeated orders to submit them and her failure to appear at multiple creditor meetings.
I don't think Judge Livingston or any other judge will have any trouble finding that Hamou filed a fraudulent petition.
Not to mention that she is NOT UNDER BANKRUPTCY PROTECTION because the Judge dismissed her petition and in so many words SAID: "Atchison is free to pursue his State claims against Debtor".
Her entire blather is meaningless as her Bankruptcy was DISMISSED.
Snoopy-who-is-Oma posted, "Yeh, I would love to be a fly on the wall inside of the courtroom of Judge Livingston..."
A fly? Judge Livingston has ordered you to appear more than once, which is why she has you under a contempt of court order. Why not show up as ordered by the judge?
Do you seriously think judges in Austin whose orders to appear you have blown off several times are going to have any patience with your whining?
Get real.
Hamou posted:
"Should the [Texas] court impose either monetary sanctions or jail on any individual it will do so at it's own discretion."
Oh. You mean such as the monetary sanctions the court imposed on you TWICE during the proceedings and which you ignored?
I do hope you realize that as soon as you show your face in court (which, of course, you won't), the judge is going to expect you to pay those outstanding sanctions.
Courts will not grant relief to litigants who are in violation of that court's prior orders to pay sanctions, to appear for examinations, and to show cause -- all orders which you have blithely ignored.
Periodically one has to step back from Hamou's rants and feigned outrage to recover one's perspective on what she's really about.
In the current round, she is huffing and wheezing about a Texas judge unjustly issuing a bench warrant for her arrest. She is virtually dripping with faked moral outrage at what she claims was abuse of the court.
But what is her own record with the courts?
She has had roughly a dozen default judgments entered against her in multiple states, resulting from her blowing off court summons to appear. And not one of these court-ordered judgments has been paid by her.
She has been arrested more than once for violating court-imposed terms of probation or release.
In the past few years alone three bench warrants have been issued for her arrest for failure to appear before a court when ordered.
She had sanctions issued against her in the original Atchison lawsuit (which he won) for abuse of discovery. She has had two monetary sanctions imposed on her by Austin courts in the past year, neither of which have been paid.
She has ignored orders of California and Texas courts to appear for debtor examinations.
She ignored multiple orders of the bankruptcy court to produce missing schedules and documents, resulting ultimately in the dismissal of her bankruptcy petition. She twice failed to appear for court-ordered creditor meetings.
In short, Hamou has an incredibly long record of defying courts and their orders.
She is the last person to be able credibly to mount any pretense of moral outrage about someone else supposedly abusing the legal system.
OCTOBER 18 2011:
The Texas District Court slapped Oma Hamou with an Order of Contempt of Court and imposed $1,000 sanctions against her for failing to comply with the Ordered Document Production and Deposition.
December 6, 2011: District Court Judge Meachem slapped ANOTHER COURT ORDER demanding Hamou comply with the previous Court Orders.
January 2012: District Court Lora Livingston Slapped an ORDER TO APPEAR AND SHOW CAUSE on Oma Hamou requiring her to appear in Person to explain her continuing violation of Court Orders.
Hamou/McConnell FAILED TO COMPLY WITH THE BANKRUPTCY COURT ORDERED DOCUMENT PRODUCTION REQUIRED NO LATER THAN SEPTEMBER 14, 2012. She further FAILED TO COMPLY WITH THE BANRUPTCY COURT ORDER THAT SHE APPEAR FOR A DEPOSITION ON SEPTEMBER 20, 2012.
by the way. Who is Judge ROBBLES? ROFL....
Hamou posted:
"The matter before Judge Livingston is this: Bob Atchison obtained a civil bench warrant for my arrest knowing I had filed for bankruptcy ......"
This shows just how psychotic and narcissistic Hamou is.
Hamou is not in control of what Judge Livingston can and cannot address once she delves back into this case. The unpaid sanctions will be addressed. The failure to appear when ordered by the court will be addressed. The contempt of court finding will be addressed. That is, of course, if Hamou ever actually appears before the judge. Which, of course, she won't.
Is Hamou really so crazy as to think she can tell a judge "you can look only at that part of the case I want you to look at. It is inconvenient for me to have you look at other aspects."???
Oh, why do I even ask?
Yes, she is that crazy.
Of course, Blake. She thinks the legal system is only for her use! She doesn't get it that she IS STILL IN CONTEMPT OF COURT! She doesn't get it that SHE BLEW OFF A COURT ORDER TO APPEAR AND SHOW CAUSE. She doesn't get it that THE COURT SLAPPED SANCTIONS ON HER FOR CONTEMPT OF COURT AND BLOWING OFF FOUR DIFFERENT ORDERS!
She thinks all of this won't matter to the Judge...Good luck with that.
LOL
Well, this should prove "interesting".
Hamou/McConnell now claims "Bob" sent a "Letter" requesting the Bench Warrant be vacated?
Newsflash: Bob NEVER sent any such letter. His attorney never sent it. Why would he? Plus the ludicrous "he told the court to not use his name and if they had any question they could contact him at his email address."?? WTF?? Nobody at all sent it. So, if such a request to vacate is in the file, guess what? It would be a FORGERY!
Yes, this could be very interesting indeed.
I think the Texas District Court will find this salient quote from Oma Hamou in her own words on her own website to be very reflective of this matter, and rest assured, they will have it in front of them and it will be instructional to them in all decisions!
Postby Oma Hamou on Mon Dec 03, 2012 11:56 am
" I REFUSED and will continue to REFUSE to cooperate with him on a judgment he won against me "
http://omahamou.com/oma/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=57&st=0&sk=t&sd=a&start=7110
What a great day so far! Lovely cool and sunny weather. Trotted down to the courthouse and have some fascinating documents in my hands.
Remember when "Ms. Hamou said...Up until this afternoon, I was completely unaware Bob Atchison wrote a letter to the court on June 30, 2012 asking the court to VACATE the warrant he sought and got for my arrest on or about March 26, 2012.." and then Oma Hamou said:
" pay for a copy of the June 30, 2012 letter make certain the DC provides you with a copy of the envelope of which the court record shows it came from the Teflon Con, your domestic partner, Bob Atchison. On a phone conversation, the court read the contents of that letter to me and yes, it does say what is published on this forum. I thank you for posting you know 100% this letter was not sent by Bob Atchison which leads me to the next question: who sent it and from what city did it came from."
I did JUST THAT!
There are TWO letters, actually. Not one. None of them dated "June 30, 2012". One dated "June 25, 2012" but not put into the file for a month because it was addressed only to "Travis County Courthouse" and nothing more specific!
It was NOT sent by Bob Atchison. Nosiree. It WAS SENT BY ROBERT D. RICHMAN, remember him? Krav Maga/Tai Chi Rabbi?? roflmao. and yes I have the handwritten envelope with the return address of "Robert D. Richman, 5446 1/2 Hermitage Avenue, Valley Village CA 91607"
Fascinating. He says HAMOU wants the "bench warrant be quash" (his exact spelling). NOT that Bob Atchison wants it vacated. It also says "she now resides in California", implying of course she used to reside in TEXAS but moved...which is a lie.
Funny, it lists a lot of reasons to vacate the warrant: litigation against Atchison, and lots of allegations, but funny, it DOES NOT INFORM THE COURT HAMOU IS UNDER BANKRUPTCY PROTECTION! NOPE. It says she "presently filed to have a bankruptcy reinstated in California".
Can't WAIT for the Court to hear all of this, Hamou had a chance to INFORM THE COURT HERSELF, thru her "paralegal Krav Maga Rabbi" but FAILED TO DO SO!
The second letter? Sent July 25, 2012. Again from Robert Richman. Even the same type of handwritten envelope with same address as above. The contents are classic:
"Dear Sir or Madam, Today I mailed you a letter regarding a vacating a bench warrant on Oma Hamou in this case. (sic) Please shred the letter and do not use my name in this matter whatsoever. If you have any queitions (sic), please contact me at the above email or phone number.
Thank you for your kind consideration, Sincerely, Rob"
Will scan and post these on the main blog later for the whole world to see. Hilarious!
Posted the actual letters and envelope on the main blog.
Sorry there Oma, but YOU said make certain the DC provides you with a copy of the envelope of which the court record shows it came from the Teflon Con, your domestic partner, Bob Atchison.
So I did. and proved YOU LIED.
Secondly, I heard about Rabbi Krav Maga from the letter he sent to Judge Klausner, who provided Bob's lawyer with a copy. Remember that letter? The one that really made Judge Klausner MAD?
Lastly, the letters are on PUBLIC FILE with a Court. They are now PUBLIC RECORDS.
Just showing the folks how Oma Hamou aka Alexandra McConnell rolls....
See how she is? SHE told us to go get copies of the letter and envelope. She just doesn't like the TRUTH it disclosed...typical.
Its called PACER, Oma. Rabbi Krav Maga's letter is PUBLIC RECORD on file with the Federal Court...duh...
The file says about Richman's letter:
"NO Communications with the Court under Local Rule 83-2.11. Correspondence sent from NON PARTY, plaintiff is pro se. This document is NOT to be filed but instead REJECTED and is ORDERED returned." Emph in original. Signed by Judge Klausner.
Those two letters from Hamou's apparently very poorly educated paralegal Robert D. Richman are the two funniest things I've seen emanate from Team Hamou in a while.
For starters, who addresses a letter to any court with no more than just "Third Floor" as the identifier of the court? Courthouses usually have a myriad of courts in them: civil courts, criminal courts, traffic courts, family and divorce courts. No wonder the letter wandered around the hallways for a month.
And "Air Mail". Good grief. That term -- along with air mail postal service itself -- has been out of use for years.
And who signs a letter to a court with just the nickname "Rob"?
My personal favorite from this cornucopia of insanity -- "Please shred the letter and do not use my name in this matter whatsoever". Who in his right mind would think a court would oblige such an ludicrous request?
Was this guy on crystal meth or something? I can just imagine the guffaws these letters drew.
But what is truly extraordinary is the fact that Hamou, who clearly either sent or had these letters sent, even attempted to pretend they came from Bob Atchison.
This just shows the flabbergasting extent to which she will lie if she thinks it serves her purpose. Just as she lied about the debt to Refai, the arrangements with O'Connor, the "theft" of a trailer that witnesses actually saw her and two men remove and for which she filed an insurance claim, the whited-out "NSF" stamp of the check she produced to the court in the Cowan case.
But it's the lies to courts that we are cataloging that are so interesting. For instance, she probably doesn't realize that we have the promissory note supposedly signed by Jim Sproul to Hamid Refai and we have the witness to service of notice also supposedly signed by Jim Sproul that Hamou filed with the federal court. The problem here, of course, is that the two putative "Sproul" signatures are not even close to being a match, indicating one or both of them are forgeries.
Yes, I cannot wait for all this to come out in court. You see, I am The Court Reporter, and Hamou certainly keeps my days interesting.
Hamou's lies today are raining down. She just posted that:
"Bob Atchison just called Mr. Richman and told him I had forged his (Mr. Richman's) signature on letters sent to the District Clerk in Texas."
Nope. What Atchison said was that he was calling to confirm whether the letters were really from Richman or whether they were forgeries.
Richman quickly said, "I'll have to get back to you" and hung up the phone.
Hamou then posted:
"Besides, attempting to intimidate, why are you calling Mr. Richman? Didn't you know it is illegal and contemptous to harass a third party?"
Atchison was calling for a very simple reason. Hamou first claimed Atchison had written these letters to the court. So Atchison, once he saw the actual letters and the envelope, had every right to inquire as to who really wrote letters that had been falsely and maliciously imputed to him by Hamou.
It is obvious that Richman knew Hamou was behind these letters, either by getting him to write them or writing them herself, as the timing of her post within minutes of Atchison's call to Richman shows he called her immediately upon hanging up the phone on Atchison.
So, by the very speed of the communication between her and Richman and her post within minutes of Atchison's call to Richman, she shows she knew all along who was really the author of letters she was falsely claiming that Atchison wrote.
It remains a mystery to me why the woman would tell such a bald-faced lie when it could be checked out by a quick trip to the clerk's office -- and was.
Actually, it's not such a mystery. The woman is psychotic and a pathological liar.
Hamou posted:
"I did not send the letters filed in District Court which bear the signature of Mr. Richman and he will be testify [sic] in a court room setting this is a true statement."
How very accommodating of Richman and Hamou. That means Bob's attorney will be spared the trouble and expense of subpoenaing Richman.
Richman can testify only one of two ways: either he did write those two letters or he did not.
If he did, then it means Hamou knew who the author of those letters was and that she lied when she said they were written by Atchison. And she further lied when she said the court clerk told her Atchison signed them.
If he did not, then it means Hamou caused the court to be presented with forged documents.
So we're looking forward to Richman's testimony with the greatest of anticipation. Even glee.
Personally, though, I'll especially enjoy that famous RICO case when the defense subpoenas Jim Sproul and puts both the promissory note to Hamid and the service filing with the federal court in front of him and asks him which, if either, of the two documents he signed.
But what will be the most fun of all? It will be when the judge and jury erupt into snickers when Hamou explains that she retained the services of someone to represent her before the Austin court whose address and last name she did not know but only knew by the name of "Rob".
Honest to God. You cannot make this stuff up.
Blake, I compared these two letters to the one sent to Federal Court Judge Clausner, which also includes the envelope as well, and all three seem identical.
SO, either Richman wrote and sent all three, or he didn't. If he did not, well, it seems a fraud may have also been perpetrated on the FEDERAL COURT AS WELL.
Yep, interesting indeed.
Hamou posted:
"Not a problem since his [Richman's] Affidavit will include the numerous calls placed to him by Bob Atchison as well as the fact he, not I wrote and sent the 2 letters on file with District Court in the State of Texas."
First, Hamou is apparently not aware that an affidavit cannot be used as evidence when a witness is able to testify in person. So if Hamou doesn't produce Richman as a witness in person, Atchison's attorney will subpoena him, as we definitely want to hear from him in open court.
In any case, we will be delighted to have Richman testify he wrote those letters, as it will prove Hamou was lying when she accused Atchison of having written them.
Atchison wins either way. He catches her in a lie about a court record, or he catches her submitting forged documents to the court.
Well, the whoppers just keep on a'coming.
Hamou posted:
"I was unaware Mr. Richman sent any letter to the Federal Court."
That's very interesting, as the letter Richman wrote to the federal District Court in which she filed her RICO case (Hamou apparently is confused about the nomenclature in the federal court system) opens with the line: "I am a paralegal assisting the plaintiff in this matter".
Perhaps Hamou should sue her paralegal for malfeasance if he is sending inappropriate correspondence to the federal courts on her behalf without her knowledge?
Darlings! How have you been? And Happy Chanukah, darling Robbele!
Oy gewalt, again with the 'things happened and I didn't know about them'? Darling, what are you paying these people? Because, darling, whatever it is, and I think we all know whatever it is, darling, you're not getting your money's worth, darling.
So concerned, darling. So concerned.
Mitzele
Oh, my dear Mitzi. It is so good to hear from you again and to be back on the blog.
But oh, my goodness, to return to such a hubbub. Letters that dear Bob did/didn't write; Ms. Hamou/McConnell/Moran's paralegal who did/didn't write them, too; a court clerk who cannot tell Atchison from Richman; Ms. H/M/M only knowing her legal representative as "Rob" and not knowing that Herr, er, Judge Klausner is a federal district court judge.
It makes all the recent woes that have kept me away from this blog just seem less, oh how do you say, änstigend.
I think I've told you all about my dear old great Aunt Gubelinde. Well, her grandson, my first cousin once removed (oh, and how we wish he'd been removed more than once) got into a bit of a scrape.
He had found his grandfather's diaries, and the poor boy completely misunderstood the points Opa had been trying to make. Well, wouldn't you just know it, but he got himself mixed up in some skinhead group in Saarbrücken and . . . well, my dears . . . I needn't go on. Suffice it to say that there'll be one less Schweinchen at the Futtertrog on Christmas Day.
Anyhoo, my dears, it's so good to be back. And I just can't wait to see how all this confusion about those letters gets sorted out.
Letters, diaries, scalp tattoos. Why do people write so much, my pets?
Wow. So now Hamou/McConnell is throwing her FRIEND Robert Richman under the bus!!
She just wrote: I was unaware Mr. Richman sent any letter to the Federal Court.
The letter sent, on similar letterhead as the letters already posted says specifically "I am a paralegal assisting the plaintiff in this matter" This matter is identified by case number as the RICO case she filed, being heard by Judge Klausner. "recently she filed for an extension of time, within which for file and served an opposition to dismissal in her RICO action" sic. Signed: "Robert D. Richman PARALEGAL" and shows at bottom "Cc; Alexandra McConnell, file"
Wow, so now she says Richman was acting WITHOUT HER KNOWLDEGE OR PERMISSION? Wow, that's a CRIME isn't it? for some stranger to involve themselves in HER legal case without permission or knowledge? Richman will probably lose his Paralegal licensing for this, if he has one.
Of course, if he DOESN'T have a paralegal license, then he committed a CRIME by representing himself as such to a FEDERAL COURT.
Gee, Hamou/McConnell really sticks up for those who help her, doesn't she! "and another one under the bus..."
She also has a huge problem with the definition of "numerous phone calls" to Richman by Bob.
Bob called him once, asking "Did you send two letters to the Texas Court for Oma Hamou? The handwriting looks like hers, we are concerned it was forged". Richman responded "I'll get back to you on that" then hung up on Bob. Bob called right back, but it went to voice mail.
Sure hope Hamou will produce Richman's PHONE RECORDS to show the truth of her claim. Of course if the makes that claim in any court, Bob's lawyers will SUBPOENA those records from Robert Richman, along with his testimony in Court.
Yes, she really has a knack for dragging those who help her down in the mud, with her.
Richman must be SO happy to have her as a "friend" right now....
OH, an Oma/Alexandra, if you question this Federal Court letter one more time, I will post THAT ONE TOO up on the web for the entire world to see.
So I see Richman (if he, in fact, wrote that email that Hamou claims is from him) is as capable of lying as is Hamou.
The email from him that she posted says:
"the only thing I [Richman] had to do with Judge Klausner, was to draft a motion to continue that I sent to you for review, signature and filling... I did not bring anytning [sic] to court"
Hamou really should get a subscription to PACER, where all filings in federal court are posted.
There is NO motion for a continuance on file. What IS in the file is a letter from Richman that reads:
"I am a paralegal assisting the plaintiff in this matter; she recently filed for an extension of time, within which for file [sic] and served an opposition to dismissal in her RICO action.
"What is the status of the request for an extension?
"If you have any questions, please contact me at the above address, phone number, or e-mail [5446 1/2 Hermitage Avenue, Valley Village, CA 91607, torahtaichi@yahoo.com, (818) 299-40801]
"Thank you for your kind consideration."
Signed:
"Sincerely,
Robert D. Richman
PARALEGAL [his caps]"
Either Richman is lying in saying that he had nothing to do with Judge Klausner other than drafting a motion, or that letter was forged.
But who knows. That supposed email from Richman is so riddled with the kinds of grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that are typical of Snoopy-who-is-Hamou that its authorship by Richman is questionable.
Certainly the extravagant claims that Richman makes about all the legal vengeance he will wreak upon Atchison do not reflect anyone with even a modicum of legal training, even at the spotty level required for a paralegal.
By the way, there's an interesting little article by the American Bar Association that contains this:
"Under the California statute, it is unlawful for a person to identify himself or herself as a paralegal unless he or she has met the qualifications of the statute and performs all services under the direction of a qualified lawyer."
It will be interesting to hear what the "qualified lawyer" who was giving Richman direction has to say about the work Richman did for Hamou that the lawyer supervised when he is subpoenaed to testify about Richman's correspondence with the federal and Texas courts.
It will be especially interesting to see what that lawyer has to say about the letter written under his "direction" that violated the federal court's Rule 83.2-11 in even being sent to the court.
Some lawyer, huh?
Well, it's been a long, busy day on the blogs.
I think it's time to step back and boil this episode down to its essence.
Last Friday afternoon Sandman-who-is-Oma posted a message from Oma-who-is-Sandman claiming that she had just found out that Bob Atchison wrote a letter to the Travis County Court asking that the bench warrant for Hamou's arrest be vacated and that Atchison then asked the court to destroy the letter and not use his name. She further claimed that the letter came in an envelope with Atchison's return address on it.
This morning (Monday) Atchison obtained copies of what is actually in the Travis County Court's case file. It contained letters essentially saying what Hamou claimed they said -- EXCEPT THAT THE LETTERS WERE WRITTEN NOT BY BOB ATCHISON BUT BY A ROBERT RICHMAN, A "PARALEGAL" WRITING ON BEHALF OF HAMOU HERSELF. The case file also contained the envelope in which a letter arrived -- BEARING THE RETURN ADDRESS OF ROBERT RICHMAN.
In short, Hamou (who apparently thought the court had fulfilled the requests to destroy the letters and not bring Richman's name into it) was caught in a huge whopper of a lie.
It's just that simple.
Oh, I forgot to add this juicy tidbit --
Hamou feigned outrage that Atchison had sent the letter to the court without giving her due notice.
Yet the letters originated with HER, and Atchison was the one who was unaware before today that the correspondence existed!!!!!
The magnitude of her lies and feigned outrage is truly psychopathic.
Let's take a look at California Business and Professions Code Section 6455 and analyze Robert D. Richman's conduct as represented on Hamou's "Ask Oma" forum, including the email she said came from Richman.
Code language:
" 'Paralegal' means a person who holds himself or herself out to be a paralegal . . . and who performs substantial legal work under the direction and supervision of an active member of the State Bar of California, as defined in Section 6060, or an attorney practicing law in the federal courts of this state, that has been specifically delegated by the attorney to him or her."
Richman's conduct:
If Richman cannot provide the name of the attorney under whose direction and supervision he was performing legal work for Hamou, then he is in violation.
Code language:
"A paralegal shall not do the following:
(1) Provide legal advice.
(2) Represent a client in court.
(3) Select, explain, draft, or recommend the use of any legal document to or for any person other than the attorney who directs and supervises the paralegal."
Richman's conduct:
Richman sent documents to two courts -- a federal district court and the Travis County, Texas court -- on behalf of Hamou, thereby representing her before those courts.
Furthermore, in the email that Hamou published from Richman, he wrote: "the only thing I had to do with Judge Klausner, was to draft a motion to continue that I sent to you for review, signature and filling [sic]."
By signing the letters to the courts with his name and by his own admission in his email to Hamou, Richman violated all these prohibitions.
Code language:
"It is unlawful for a person to identify himself or herself as a paralegal on any advertisement, letterhead, business card or sign, or elsewhere unless he or she has met the qualifications of subdivision (c) of Section 6450 and performs all services under the direction and supervision of an attorney who is an active member of the State Bar of California or an attorney practicing law in the federal courts of this state who is responsible for all of the services performed by the paralegal."
Richman's conduct:
Richman identified himself in writing as a paralegal in his correspondence with both the federal district court and the Texas court. Unless he was corresponding with these courts "under the direction and supervision" of a licensed attorney, he violated this provision of the law.
Code language:
"Any person who violates the provisions of Section 6451 or 6452 is guilty of an infraction for the first violation, which is punishable upon conviction by a fine of up to two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) as to each consumer with respect to whom a violation occurs, and is guilty of a misdemeanor for the second and each subsequent violation, which is punishable upon conviction by a fine of two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) as to each consumer with respect to whom a violation occurs, or imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one year, or by both that fine and imprisonment."
Richman's conduct:
The above code section makes Richman's conduct a criminal violation, not a civil violation. Upon a second violation, the crime is elevated from an infraction to a misdemeanor.
Richman sent three letters to the courts.
Bob, I think Hamou and Richman have provided ample evidence to support criminal complaints against Mr. Richman, both in Texas and in California.
I think you should consider it seriously.
Hamou posted:
"those communications [the letters from Richman] serve to prove a request on my behalf was made regarding the warrant which my abuser/stalker, Bob Atchison, got against me"
Nitwit. They also prove you lied when on December 7 you posted on your forum that those letters were sent by Bob Atchison and that the court had an envelope with his return address on it.
But at least it's nice (and very convenient for us) to see you now acknowledging YOU had them sent and knew all along Bob Atchison had nothing to do with them.
Darling Blakele,
The poor dear doesn't know which end is up, does she, darling? Hoohah, the best part is how all of this happened. My darling sister-in-law, the very attractive for her age Frieda, always says, "don't spit on the ceiling, darling, it has to come down somewhere."
Mitzi
Well, I see that Hamou's inability to write grammatically also means that she cannot read what is grammatically written.
Regarding the letters from Richman, I posted that, "she had them sent".
She responded with:
"This is a deliberate lie [her emphasis] as nothing contained in my above web posting indicates I and not Mr. Richman sent those 2 letters to the Texas District Court ......"
The problem is that I did not say in my post that she sent the letters. I said she had them sent, which quite clearly means that someone else sent them.
Typical Hamou. Caught in a whopper as big as the one when she claimed the Austin court clerk read those letters to her over the phone and told her they were written by Bob Atchison and that the return envelope bore his name and address, she tries to obfuscate by claiming everyone else is lying.
Apparently Hamou thought the court had, in fact, destroyed the letters and removed Richman's name from the record, as he requested. So she decided to post about them and claim they were written by Bob Atchison and that he tried to eradicate the trail back to him by requesting that his name not be used.
Now why would she do that? Two reasons:
She wanted to claim Atchison had written something to the court that would suggest he had done something wrong regarding the issuance of the bench warrant for her arrest.
And she wanted to be able to weep and wail with feigned moral outrage that Atchison had failed to put her on notice of correspondence with the court regarding the case.
And not only did she feign outrage, she continued to try to lend credibility to her ruse by posting this little gem:
"I thank you {Moshein] for posting you know 100% this letter was not sent by Bob Atchison which leads me to the next question: who sent it and from what city did it came from. Perhaps while you or the Teflon Con are at the court house you might ask them if they would dust that evelope for finger prints?"
Of course, this whole scam blew up in her face when it turned out the court had ignored Richman's later request to dispose of the correspondence and keep his name out of it and had instead retained the letters and the envelope (which contains a Santa Clarita postmark) in the case file, thereby giving the lie to her claim that Atchison had written the letters and that she knew nothing about them until last Friday, December 7.
However, I do like her suggestion of having the envelope examined for fingerprints. That will be useful if Richman tries to claim he did not send the letters.
As Rob Moshein posted, this is the way she rolls.
Today's news:
What used to be a nice home for sale in what used to be a nice neighborhood. Going cheap.
(Read more: http://www.city-data.com/forum/california/563010-lancaster-palmdale-horrible-they-say-santa-2.html#ixzz2EqLaso1p)
Now why would Hamou have freaked out about the above post?
She squats in a house in Littlerock. There is no mention at all of Littlerock in the above post or in the blog linked to the post.
And her paranoid claim about her getting the license plate of some car near her house last night and its being traced to a "stalker/abuser" from the Alexander Palace forum is very interesting.
I hope she can produce the proof of that claim when she is sued for defamation.
I just finished reading a wonderful book, "Saving the Tsar's Palaces", by Christopher Morgan and Irina Orlova.
But I found something curious. The book goes into great detail on the personalities involved over the years in conserving and restoring the suburban palaces of the Romanovs, including the directors, administrators, curators, artists and craftsmen involved from the 1920's to 2004. The index, in fact, lists hundreds of such people.
Yet nowhere in the book is Ivan Sautov mentioned, something which I find quite curious.
So I did a little looking around to see why Sautov might have escaped mention in such a book. I found an interesting article in Britain's "The Guardian", written by Adrian Levy and Cathy Scott-Clark who have both won Britain's Journalist of the Year awards.
They describe a meeting with Ivan Sautov and Larissa Bardovskaya in which Levy and Scott-Clark were asking whether palace archives contained any of Kuchumov's papers. (Kuchumov was prominent in the early post-war work to save the palaces.)
Sautov and Bardovskaya refused to cooperate with the inquiry unless money or something else of value to them was forthcoming. Sautov's words to them were, "We are not a charitable enterprise. Why should you make money from what we know?"
This seems an extraordinary position for a museum to take with journalists who are trying to create widespread public interest in the history of the palaces, their destruction, and the Russian achievement in their restoration.
This sounds very much like Bob Atchison's experience when Sautov offered him unfettered access to the palaces in return for an S-class Mercedes of a certain color sitting at a local dealer.
Hamou posted:
"I hope you can produce in court some tangible proof that Dr. Sautov said this"
Oh. So now you're suing Roofie on behalf of Dr. Sautov?
Or you've found a court that's going to let you introduce as evidence anything on any topic that makes you angry?
Have fun getting a court to agree to that.
Dimwit.
And, yes. You will be slapped with a countersuit for defamation when you make this terrifying legal move of yours. And, yes, one of the things you'll have to prove is that you were "stalked" last night and got the license plate of someone associated with the Alexander Palace forum.
And that you were on a plane from Boston to Los Angeles on 9/11.
And that Hamid Refai obtained a judgment against you fraudulently.
And that you have had several cancers.
And that you or the people you brought into the houses in which you were squatting did not set fire to the kitchens in at least two houses. (One can only wonder what was being "cooked" there?)
And that you have been paying O'Connor rent for each and every month while you've been in his house.
And that you had the assets you claimed you had when you presented O'Connor with loan approval documents.
And that Jim Sproul signed both the promissory note you presented to Refai and the proof of service you filed with the federal court, even though the signatures don't remotely match.
You've got quite a few lies to answer for. Do not fool yourself into thinking you're the only one who can throw lawsuits around.
Hamou posted:
"I am looking forward in reviewing the proof that every word you and your ilk have published on the web has been the truth."
Well, Hamou, you're going into court with a wheelbarrow load of documents you have selectively edited.
Atchison will be going into court with quite a list of witnesses who have first-hand knowledge and quite a few documents of your various scams.
Some of them you can guess. Some will surprise you.
But you can rest assured that when all the dust settles the judge and/or jury will have a very clear picture of what you have been about these many years.
Oopsie Oma. Patrick's wasn't sold to
an "interested party". The VA took back the house at the Trustee's sale on Friday, as they guaranteed the loan. So, you LIED about Patrick doing a deed to Bank of America.
So, now you have a NEW LANDLORD, who will be demanding RENT for each and every single day you occupy their house and property (which is not YOUR property, never was) until they evict you, and given the state of the place, they surely will.
They will be most adamant about collecting every penny from you. They have a large legal department that has lots of lawyers on salary who do this every day all day.
Oma a "Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure" means the Bank gets ownership without having to Foreclose and hold a Trustee's sale.
Patrick's House (still NOT your house) sold AT A TRUSTEE'S FORECLOSURE SALE, so there can't be a deed in lieu...
but then, you have always been a very special kind of stupid...
Hamou posted:
"I have never been sued by BMW ...... I have never owned a BMW in my entire life."
No one here said you had been sued by BMW. What was said was that someone from BMW credit came by Nancy's Reseda Screen & Glass looking for you and Jim Sproul regarding a BMW that had been purchased on a second-party sale but on which payments were not being made.
So, if you have never owned a BMW, does the owner of the white BMW know you're driving it with a towel over the license plates? (And, no, no one is stalking you. This is simply a report made by interested people in Littlerock who volunteered the information.)
Hamou posted:
"We know who the owner of the Crown Victoria belongs too. We know who the owner of the white truck belongs too."
Who the owner belongs to???
Did she mean who the car belongs to?
And it's "to", not "too".
One has to wonder, though -- just where do all these "stalkers" find room to park this fleet of cars?
Hamou posted:
"Actually, they come by one at a time or drive by several times and some of them get out of their car and take pictures."
That's very interesting. None of us on this board are having anyone watch you.
Either you're lying, you're paranoid, or there are other people who have reason to want to know what you or someone else in O'Connor's house is up to.
Or some combination of the above.
Very interesting, indeed.
Regarding O'Connor's Deed in Lieu, Hamou apparently is unaware that the deed was never signed or recorded.
He wanted to do so, but the VA refused to allow it because it was a VA loan with them acting as guarantor, and they refused to have their interest cut off.
So O'Connor remained the owner of the property until December 14, 2012.
I'm sure Hamou paid him rent until then. And she'll assure everyone she will produce proof of it.
And the sunset was bright green today.
Ms. Hamou, I can assure you that Mitzi Kedem is every bit as real as Nitzana Kedem, the journalist who wrote that glowing paean to your film-making accomplishments some years ago that was published on the internet.
Here is Ms. Hamou's response to my post about Nitzana Kedem: "In 2003 a journalist by the name of Nitzana Kedem wrote an article about Enigma Films projects."
Journalists write more than one article, and they write for or sell their work to media publications.
Could you please tell us what other articles Nitzana Kedem wrote? Which publication was she working for when she interviewed you? What were her journalistic credentials? Where, other than on your own website, was Kedem's article published?
Journalists are not ghosts. If they exist, they and their work can be found. Nothing by Nitzana Kedem can be found other than that one glowing article about your film company published on your website and nowhere else.
If you think you're going to drag Mitzi Kedem's name into court, Nitzana's name will be right behind her. They are sisters, you know.
Kind regards,
Mr. Dick
Hamou posted that she was "on the lamb". Did she mean on the lam or has she taken up bestiality?
I found her most recent rant very revealing. In it, she excuses her failure to pay Boardrush the $50,000 retainer she promised them because they had not done any work for her.
Doesn't the dimbulb understand that standard business practice is to perform NO work until the retainer is paid? Failure to perform work before the agreed-upon retainer is received is no excuse for not honoring a contract.
Of course, Hamou got the benefit of the bargain for her part. She was able to swan around boasting about having retained a big marketing firm to represent her project. No need to tell the people she was trying to impress that she had not and would never pay for the services she was braying about.
It is this kind or shady business practice that left a trail of a dozen default judgments against her in the wake of her imploded ponzi movie project.
And it is just another version of the stunts she pulls today in her less-grandiose attempts to con her way into the houses of unsuspecting landlords in the Antelope Valley where she then squats until they haul her into court or until she has rendered the property uninhabitable.
My she is on quite a psychotic rant today...
I don't understand why Hamou keeps ranting about her stolen barn.
Why doesn't she just file an insurance claim for it?
Oh, wait ......
She did, but State Farm determined the claim was fraudulent after finding out that O'Connor owned the "barn" (a portable shed, actually) and after talking to a witness who saw Hamou and two men remove two outbuildings from O'Connor's property.
If the "barn" is really missing, then she must have plopped it down on someone's property where she had no right to be, and they had it removed.
Maybe this mysterious Rick did it.
Tough luck, huh?
I don't know anyone named "Rick" in Calfornia. I know even less about barns. We didn't have any in Beverly Hills. Oma was probably born in one, likes to live in them clearly, so that must explain this obsession with one.
Sorry... Can't help there. Call State Farm maybe they will...oh, wait, they won't...
Wow, I'd switch insurance companies if I filed a claim with State Farm for theft of my property in JUNE and it still hadn't been paid SIX MONTHS LATER!
Hamou is overlooking some things in her attempts to exculpate herself for her behavior.
First, she goes on and on about Huiku Batchelor and Patrick O'Connor going after her only after they read about her in these blogs.
But such an argument overlooks a fundamental problem with that defense. WHY did Batchelor and O'Connor investigate her on the internet? They obviously first rented to her without searching the internet; otherwise they would never have allowed her into their property in the first place.
And neither has ever shown any sign of interest in Russian history, so all this talk about colluding with the "Gay Mafia" from the Russian history community is idle nonsense.
If Hamou was a good tenant, paying her rent on time and taking reasonable care of the property, WHY would any landlord have gone to the police about her, as both Batchelor and O'Connor did? Why would she have been arrested on a million-dollar bond? Why would she have been forced to pay restitution to Batchelor in order to stay out of jail?
It is quite clear that Batchelor and O'Connor came across these blogs only after they started having problems with non-payment, bounced checks, and property destruction.
The second problem with Hamou's attempts at exculpating herself is her claim that because she has not been arrested recently or prosecuted since the Batchelor case, that is proof that the police view her as having committed no crime.
Anyone remotely aware of what is going on in California -- and especially in Los Angeles County -- is perfectly aware of why Hamou has managed to stay out of jail the past couple of years.
California is under a federal order to release 3,000 prisoners early in order to address overcrowding in their prisons. District Attorneys -- especially in Los Angeles Country where the deficits are extreme -- are turning away cases that five years ago they would have prosecuted in a minute. Now they are focusing their limited resources on violent crime and major felonies.
And the police resources are highly strained, especially in Los Angeles County. Detective squads have had their overtime reduced or eliminated. Some squads in Los Angeles County have been put on four-day workweeks. In some precints in Los Angeles County, even car theft is no longer being investigated unless a carjacking was involved.
(It is demonstrative of this situation that the only time Hamou was arrested recently was in San Bernardino County, which is not as financlally constrained as Los Angeles County.)
The situation is especially critical in the Palmdale precint where violent and drug-related crime is rife and where the detective unit has been put intermittently on short hours. (This is perhaps the reason that Hamou keeps squatting from one property to another in that part of north county; she knows her type of crime at the moment is flying under the radar.)
What Hamou doesn't seem to understand is that in a civil case a judge will hear evidence on the above situation. Her argument that because she has not been arrested recently is proof that the police believe she has committed no crime will not stand on its own. The judge will allow evidence (including the testimony of witnesses) that crimes were, in fact, committed, despite the police or prosecutors having taken no action.
We are looking forward to a complete judicial record being formed from the testimony of many witnesses, at least four of whom have gone to the police about Hamou before they ever found these blogs and completely independently of any contact with the bloggers here.
A years-long pattern of scams both petty and large will emerge, and the list of victims and their experiences will be memorialized.
A wonderful Christmas Eve to you all! This holiday is especially blessed, give all of the excellent and positive news from you all. Bob's business is growing and booked well out into next year. Bordeaux is planning another trip back to France for me next year, after also renewing my contract, of course!
All of your recent news is similarly blessed and we are so happy for you all. The lawyers, and sadly their numbers seem to grow, are also sending in the excellent news I sent to you privately.
Everyone is getting the things they so well deserve, it seems, on this holiday.
We are so happy to hear it all.
Have a great Christmas! We are staying quiet here, with me being Jewish and Bob who prefers Orthodox Christmas, which will be celebrated with our huge annual party!
So, we've been having fun today on ancestry.com with Bob's family...My family of course has no records left in Eastern Europe...but Bob's family is pretty amazing, and the DNA testing has confirmed them...
Bob's 24th direct Great Grandmother was Eleanor Duchess of Aquitaine Countess of Poitiers , whose first husband, of course was King Louis VII (Capet) of France, and her second husband, Bob's 24th direct Great GrandFATHER was Henry II, King of England Plantagenet! Bob thus shares common direct ancestors with HM the Queen Elizabeth II and Diana Princess of Wales...
if you trace Eleanor back directly, you find Bob's 54th direct Great Grandfather, Flavius Valerius Constantinius, we know him today as Constantine the Great,who founded Constantinople, and his mother is St. Helena Colchester who is Bob's 55th great grandmother. She found the Tomb of the Holy Sepulchre and what was called "The One True Cross" in Jerusalem. She an her son Constantine are both Saints in the Orthodox Church, Constantine is called Equal to the Apostles in the Church!
Amazing that Bob was drawn to the Orthodox Church long before discovering he is directly descended from Constantine!
There is some cool Native American direct ancestry as well. Bob's 9th direct Great grandmother is Princess Pocahontas, daughter of Chief Powhatan, of Jamestown fame.
Another direct 8th Great Grandfather of Bob's was a Cherokee Chief! Amatoya Moytoy, Chief of Chota around 1700. His most famous descendent, Bob's 4th great grandfather was Crowing Rooster Tuskingo Shoe Boots, who fought with Andrew Jackson in the War of 1812 and was awarded honors from the US Congress for his service! Notably, he was presented a jeweled gilt silver sword from a grateful US Congress that cost $1,000 in 1812!
Hey Oma, when you get that RICO thing up and running, we will make CERTAIN that you can produce that AMEX card you swore you had in your own name, and then EXPLAIN to the COURT why it doesn't appear on your CREDIT REPORT AND why you FAILED to mention it in TWO Bankruptcy filins, UNDER OATH.
Postby Sandman on Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:19 am
AmEx does an excellent job normally of verifying the information and records of people with whom they extend credit. The company obviously did believe in her project, and still believes in Oma because she does still have a credit card with them in her own name.
Hamou posted:
"Mr. W.D. Morton did not have dementia when I was a tenant in his home and law enforcement will testify this is a historical fact not one of several of your published lies about him."
That's convenient.
I don't know what Harmon Mike Pyles will do, but Hamou is going to save us the trouble of procuring a subpoena duces tecum for Detective Sherry Stanley's appearance in court, along with the case file assembled when Mr. Morton's son and daughter-in-law went to the police about Hamou.
The case file will show, among other interesting things, that Hamou had been living with Morton under an alias, something revealed by the investigation.
And don't you love it? Hamou will have the police testify not to just any fact, but to a "historical" fact.
Yep. Hamou is definitely the stuff of the ages.
Hamou posted:
"Detective Stanley says what was published on the web about her is/was a lie ...... In her report which will be attached to my RICO brief this detective in law enforcement states as a matter of fact, she found no eividence of my having committed any crime against Mr. Morton and goes on to say she personally told this to Donald's family."
I guess Hamou doesn't realize that such evidence is hearsay and cannot be admitted if Detective Stanley is able to appear in court.
At trial, Detective Stanley will be put on the stand to testify under oath to what she said to whom -- as will Randy Morton.
There is a difference between saying Hamou committed no crime and saying Hamou could not be prosecuted for other reasons.
We'll leave it to Detective Stanley to testify to what she actually determined in her investigation and to Randy Morton to testify to what he was told by Detective Stanley.
And we're entirely comfortable as to what that will be.
Hamou has been posting since the early days in 2009 of that thread on her "Ask Oma" forum that she has documents from law enforcement that she is going to use at trial.
Yet her 2012 RICO case (that got dismissed) failed to include a single one of those exhibits "provided" to her by "law enforcement".
Did she just forget them? Did a printer break down?
It is one thing to post that you have this and that. It is another thing to produce it in court.
For years Hamou has posted her "legal briefs" and her "motions" from this and that legal action, pretending that by writing or posting something, her case was, for all intents and purposes, won.
But her real track record in court is beyond abysmal. She has a dozen and a half judgments against her, most by default. Her bankruptcy petition, which she filed to dodge two bench warrants, was dismissed by the bankruptcy judge. Three of her own lawyers have sued her and won. Two courts have ordered her into debtor's examinations (with which she has failed to comply).
It will be fascinating finally to see all this "evidence" from "law enforcement" that Hamou has had in hand for so long and is going to include in her RICO filing.
How do we know NONE of the "law enforcment" Hamou aka McConnell claims will "Testify" on her behalf will NEVER DO SO?
Aside of course that she's made this self same claim in as many words for over TEN YEARS now...
Easy. She would have to hear Det. Stanley testify as to WHY the LAPD investigated her for writing checks on Don Morton's account without his knowledge or permission, and that it was Morton's FAMILY who called the police and the cops felt it was WORTH INVESTIGATING...
She would have to hear the Orange County California police testify about four checks written by Hamou on a CLOSED ACCOUNT and why the people who got those bad checks went TO THE POLICE and filed complaints...
She would have to hear the San Bernadino police testify WHY THEY ARRESTED HER FOR WRITING A BAD CHECK TO MRS BATCHELOR AND WHY THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY INSISTED ON PRESSING A FELONY CHARGE while she SAT IN JAIL FOR WEEKS...
The Santa Monica police would come by as well.
Not to mention the nice LA County Sheriff who investigated her for ATTEMPTING TO SELL A MOTORCYCLE TO WHICH SHE HELD NO TITLE OR HAD OWNERSHIP!
Yes, the last thing Hamou would ever want is the litany of police who have investigated her in the same room at the same time...under oath. I, on the other hand, would welcome it and I pray daily it will happen someday!
Hamou posted:
"It is my opinion based on the record which I will be attaching as an Exhibit in my RICO brief, a high bail was placed on me because of the lies published on the web about me"
It is my opinion based on the record that a high bail was placed on you when the magistrate looked up your record and saw you had multiple convictions for passing bad checks, probation violations, numerous default judgments after failing to respond to court summons, and an outstanding bench warrant at the LAX office of the Los Angeles County Sheriff.
You probably looked like a high risk for not showing up in court if you could make bail.
Go figure.
More lies from Hamou aka McConnell. she insists "nobody" knows why bail was set at $1 million. Well, that is a LIE. Why? Here is the process as set out for San Bernardino County:
Once the inmate gets transported from the precinct they are taken to see a district court commissioner. This is called the “initial bail hearing.” The purpose of this hearing is to review the current charges that the defendant is facing as well as verify basic information about the defendant and review their criminal history. Based off of all the information the commissioner has they decide the bail amount. Once a commissioner has set a bail the case becomes active.
A specific PERSON set the bail at a million dollars. The District Court Commissioner. HE made the decision AFTER reviewing Hamou's criminal history.
Period.
Also, can't wait for the Mortons to explain exactly WHY they named all of these alias names for Oma in August 2002, when they tried to petition the Los Angeles Court on a Domestic Violence petition to PROTECT Don Morton from her, and WHY they filed the Petition in the first place... we will also make certain George Sellers, their attorney testifies in court too:
ABRAMOU REBBECCA - Respondent
AKA OMA HAMOU - Respondent
CHEDID OMA - Respondent
JORDAN REBBECCA E. - Respondent
MATIN OMA - Respondent
MCCONNELL OMA L. - Respondent
TAYLOR JORDAN - Respondent
Wonderful news. The return of the Autochromes plates to the Alexander Palace was featured on Russian Television news and they specifically mentioned that "Bob Atchison" made it happen! Here is the video, in Russian, but you can hear Bob mentioned in the last minute of the video. You can see alot of the plates also.
http://tvkultura.ru/article/show/article_id/71102/brand_id/19725/type_id/3
Hamou posted:
"It does not impress me that he [Atchison] was mentioned in the Russian media, after all. he had to have a friend, Mike Pyles, of his donating a large sum of money in order for him to get mentioned while on the other hand, I was mentioned on my merits, not because of a 'donation'".
Your merits?
Do you mean the press releases that publicity firm in Russia released at your behest -- a firm which you never paid, by the way?
Or do you mean the Dun & Bradstreet report based on fake claims of having a film studio with 100 employees (in Don Morton's backyard, no less)?
Or maybe the Global Insight report that they wrote based on fraudulent representations made to them? The report that they later demanded you cease to publish or circulate when they weren't paid -- a request you ignored.
Or perhaps the string of debts and blown off promises you left behind in Russia?
Or that barnstormer of a movie that was never made, despite a string of bad checks being written to various film services to create a facade of having a movie in production?
Your merits, indeed.
Hamou posted:
"In any event, I never made this kind of statement to Dunn & Bradstreet but I have a strong suspicion who did."
Right. Someone else called Dun & Bradstreet to list your business.
Just like the bench warrant at LAX was issued for your arrest because someone stole your identity so that you didn't know you were supposed to go to court.
Just like the process server lied to the court about serving you and Jim Sproul in the Refai lawsuit.
Just like Baruch Cohen (your own attorney) misrepresented you in federal court.
Just like Shane Boasberg (another of your attorneys) appeared in the contempt hearing in Austin without your knowledge.
Just like you had no idea Robert Richman sent correspondence to the Texas court on your behalf.
I have never heard of a person plagued by so many problems because of things done by others in her name without her knowledge or authorization.
Then again, I've never met such a liar.
Hamou posted:
"I have never deliberately lied"
I see. So you just thought you were on that plane from Boston to Los Angeles on 9/11 when you narrowly escaped death.
(We have the email to Boardrush, you know. I can't wait for the judge and jury to see it.)
Hmmm.
Three more posts from Hamou last night, but not one word of response to the above post.
We're still waiting to hear how she accidentally told her publicity firm on the evening of 9/11 that she had been on a plane to Los Angeles that left Boston that morning after two earlier flights had hit the Wold Trade Towers.
Perhaps she missed this news story before writing her whopper of a disgustingly cynical lie:
"The morning of Sept. 11, no one understood what was going on. Not even officials at Logan International Airport, as made clear by their first statement that morning. 'We’ve closed the airport to all arriving and all departing flights,' said Joe Lawless, Massport’s director of public safety, to the press."
When Hamou is cross-examined about her credibility on the stand in her famous RICO case, there will be many, many examples of her lies to landlords, to people she corralled into doing free work to prop up her movie scam, and to others.
This 9/11 email, though, will be the centerpiece.
Of course, she'll just explain to the court that someone hacked into her email account that evening to write her publicity firm claiming she had narrowly escaped a harrowing death that morning.
And the judge and jury will buy it.
Right.
It seems Hamou keeps forgetting just how many of her lies are memorialized in writing that we will produce:
- her 9/11 email
- the documents she provided the loan company as part of the house purchase scam against O'Connor, where she claimed to have $145,000 in cash and to have a $2 million business (that she ran out of a mail drop box, no less)
- the forged signature of Jim Sproul on the proof of service she submitted to federal court
- the post she recently made where she claimed the Travis County clerk told her there was a letter in the case file written by Bob Atchison asking that the bench warrant for Hamou's arrest be withdrawn
- the large set of documents Randy Morton thoughtfully saved
- the bill of sale for a motorcycle she did not own
The list goes on. But you get the idea.
I'm sure, though, she'll have an explanation for all of this that the judge and jury will believe.
Right.
Contempt of Court is something Hamou is VERY familiar with! She's had four different Judges find her in Contempt of Court herself, and of course has a BENCH WARRANT out for her arrest for that contempt.
Talk about the OLD pot calling the kettle black.
Hamou posted again and still ducked the issue about that email to Boardrush about that fake plane ride she took on 9/11.
She somehow thinks she's going to get through a trial without her credibility and her history being revealed for what it is.
But, hey, it's New Year's Eve, and we should get into the holiday spirit.
So let's raise a cup to Auld Lang Syne:
Should all my old crimes be forgot
And new ones never found;
Should all my old crimes be forgot
Until I find a home.
For old men are hard to find
As I am now old, too;
They’ll take a check, I’ll say it’s good
For I am now old, too.
And sure now you will pay your rent
And sure now I’ll pay mine;
Please take this check, it’s all I’ve got
Since I am now old, too.
For old men are hard to find
As I am now old, too;
They’ll take a check, I’ll say it’s good
For I am now old, too.
We two can hide inside all day
And keep the blinds tight drawn;
But we’ve dodged round many a nosy judge
Since we have gotten old.
For old men are hard to find
As I am now old, too;
They’ll take a check, I’ll say it’s good
For I am now old, too.
We two have stayed long on the lam
From morning sun till dine;
But warrants now have come and stuck
Since Texas to I went.
For old men are hard to find
As I am now old, too;
They’ll take a check, I’ll say it’s good
For I am now old, too.
Regarding "her" barn, Hamou posted:
"he's going to be arrested for theft and if he didn't, whoever did do it will be arrested."
Hamou has been going on about that barn for months now, claiming that the "thieves" are going to be arrested.
Same thing with O'Connor. She has been saying for months that he was about to be arrested for violating the protective order. Yet he's still walking about as near as I can tell, despite the police in Anchorage and Palmdale having his name and knowing his whereabouts.
She forgets that she has insisted time and time again that if there has been no arrest, there has been no crime.
There have been no arrests for this alleged theft. There has been no arrest of O'Connor. Ergo there have been no crimes.
Hamou asked me:
"Once again, who died and made you God?"
No one. I'm simply following your logic.
You say that because you have not been arrested for bad checks to many people going back for years that you committed no crime in writing them.
You say that because you were not arrested for trying to sell O'Connor's motorcycle without his permission you committed no crime.
You say that because you were not arrested for filing a false insurance claim with State Farm that you committed no crime in making the attempt.
You say that because you were not arrested for providing fraudulent documents to the mortgage loan company that you committed no crime.
As I've said before, there are many reasons that the police, district attorneys, and courts do not pursue every crime. It does not mean a crime was not committed.
You posted months ago that you had contacted the Ahcnorage Police and that they had told O'Connor they would arrest him immediately if he violated the protective order.
He has not been arrested. So by your own logic, he committed no crime.
Hamou posted:
"The checks in Irvine the report on file with law enforcement states there is no evidence I deliberately set about to deceive anyone by issuing checks on a closed accout. The San Bernadino District Attorney's office realized I did have the financial means to make the check I had provided to my ex-landlord whole and is something I had planned to do in the first place before she read the lies published on the web about me by Rob Moshein and Bob Atchison, the DA allowed me to pay it."
Irvine did not prosecute you for the several bad checks you wrote because, in order to keep from clogging the courts, Orange County had (and still has) a program to encourage bad checks to be made good by forgoing prosecution if the check writer made the check good. However, it was not until several recipients went to the police before you made the checks good.
No one "accidentally" writes bad check after bad check after bad check, as you have been doing for years.
And the San Bernardino case involved much more than your just realizing you made a mistake and quickly making the bad check good. You were arrested on a $1 million dollar bail, and there were innumerable court appearances over a 13-month period during which you had to hire an attorney and struggled through continuance after continuance to come up with what the court called "victim restitution". You finally ponied up the money to avoid prison when the judge refused you any further continuances.
Do you really think we don't know all about what was going on in these cases? And do you really think we cannot prove it?
You have been living off bad checks written on closed and/or empty accounts at least since your days with Marcus Demian.
All "inadvertent", though, I'm sure.
Don't worry Oma, we will have Monique Hahn happily come testify in Court, about how she had to SUE YOU (you LOST, she WON) for the bad check you wrote. You were in NO HURRY to pay back that money UNTIL the POLICE CONTACTED YOU. Just like Mrs. Batchelor who had to wait over a YEAR for you to pay VICTIM'S RESTITUTION!
Bring it Oma. LOTS of people want to talk about you in Court...Debbie, William, Charlane, Eric, the list is very long...We will subpoena them all...
FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCDDURE:
Rule 608. A Witness’s Character for Truthfulness or Untruthfulness
(a) Reputation or Opinion Evidence. A witness’s credibility may be attacked or supported by testimony about the witness’s reputation for having a character for truthfulness or untruthfulness, or by testimony in the form of an opinion about that character. But evidence of truthful character is admissible only after the witness’s character for truthfulness has been attacked.
(b) Specific Instances of Conduct. Except for a criminal conviction under Rule 609, extrinsic evidence is not admissible to prove specific instances of a witness’s conduct in order to attack or support the witness’s character for truthfulness. But the court may, on cross-examination, allow them to be inquired into if they are probative of the character for truthfulness or untruthfulness of:
(1) the witness;
Fule 609. Impeachment by Evidence of a Criminal Conviction
(a) In General. The following rules apply to attacking a witness’s character for truthfulness by evidence of a criminal conviction:
(1) for a crime that, in the convicting jurisdiction, was punishable by death or by imprisonment for more than one year, the evidence:
(A) must be admitted, subject to Rule 403, in a civil case or in a criminal case in which the witness is not a defendant; and
(B) must be admitted in a criminal case in which the witness is a defendant, if the probative value of the evidence outweighs its prejudicial effect to that defendant; and
(2) for any crime regardless of the punishment, the evidence must be admitted if the court can readily determine that establishing the elements of the crime required proving — or the witness’s admitting — a dishonest act or false statement.
Here's something interesting.
Yesterday afternoon I watched on my computer as "Sandman" first posted a message he supposedly received from "Ms. Hamou", then a few minutes later added more text to the message, then a few minutes later changed some wording in the message, then a few minutes later bold-faced some of the earlier text.
This could mean only one of two things: "Sandman" is posting messages from "Ms. Hamou" that are not accurate transmissions of real messages, or "Sandman" is "Ms. Hamou".
I think we know which it is.
Hamou posted to me:
"You have hoisted yourself on your own tetard."
My "tetard". What in the world is a tetard?
And here's a challenge to your drivel: why don't you post one of these supposed communications from "law enforcement" that calls anyone here a liar?
Hamou posted:
"For starters, Detective McCormick of the Los Angeles Sheriff' Department in Palmdale, never said what has been published on the web or in communications to third parties about her neither did Detective Stanley and Detective Carr from the Irvine Police Department says he never said what Mike Pyles published on the web about him and there are more..."
I see. So you don't actually have anything in writing. We're just supposed to take your word for it.
Like we were supposed to believe you flew from Boston to Los Angeles on 9/11.
Right.
Hamou also posted:
"Hamid and his People"
So this Mike Pyles character contacted Refai and the Arab world?
Well, now, ain't he enterprising.
What is Hamou trying to do today? Keep us all in stitches?
Good grief. Is Hamou hopped up on something this afternoon?
"Tetard"?
"physciall" distress?
"has your brains turned to mush"
Oh, brother.
Blake,
Only a "retard" would think the word is "tetard" not "petard"...
Only a "retard" would think the US Attorney's office investigates anything. They only prosecute. The FBI does the investigations!
Well, maybe somebody with a hillbilly education from the slums of West Virginia and trailer parks of rural Michigan would think it too...
or in this case, its the same thing.
Nobody is investigating me. Nobody has...the "tetard" has nothing else to say so the tired old drivel comes out again...just like it has done for years and years
Remember years ago when the FBI was going to come break down our doors "any moment now"? Ahh the Golden Oldies.
tetard....LOL what a retard.
Hamou
As always you miss the point. It isn't BECAUSE you grew up poor the world thinks you are uneducated.
Your GRAMMAR proves you are uneducated. "Your" instead of "You're"..."tetard" instead of "petard"..." with the attach documents"..."has your brains all turned to mush"..."the crime of fraud and perjury is also going to be"...
My favorite quote of late: "A proper education in the usage of the English Language is the difference between knowing your shit, and knowing you're shit".
I know which applies in this case!
PS: there is a HUGE difference between filing some worthless complaint with the FBI, and their ACTUALLY DOING SOMETHING ABOUT IT. I have no doubt Hamou aka McConnell FILED someting. I am equally certain the FBI HAS DONE NOTHING ABOUT IT! Nor will the "US Attorney" despite her psychotic "hopes"...
In a post in which Hamou is protesting the suggestion she is not well educated, she writes "incompacity" to mean "incapacity".
She also writes, "what kind of vidictive each of you are", which manages both to use an adjective without an accompanying noun and to misspell "vindictive".
Here's my favorite, though, from this mishmash of a post:
"you knew a permanent restraining order was in place on Patrick yet you violated it."
Exactly how can one person violate a restraining order against a different person and to which he is not a party?
Only in the world according to The Woman Who Sued Herself.
Boy, "Sandman", that's some diary entry. Hamou really is a sensitive soul capable of such elegiac expression. Who but a true artist would write such florid, wordy, melodramatic prose in a diary?
I hope Ms. Hamou includes this entry in her RICO brief. The judge will be very impressed on so many levels.
But "Sandman". You misspelled "response" as "responce". Honestly, your spelling is no better than Hamou's.
Now why would that be?
hmmm. I wonder if Bench Warrants show up in passport control checks at the airport?
I think they might.
Hamou doesn't seem to understand that when she posts her diary entries, her supposed life story, correspondence with her "legal team", and other such personal and private things on the internet she invites response from the public and loses the right to claim invasion of privacy when people then enter into an examination and public discussion of her private life. She is the one who first opened the door.
Unfortunately, the response is not the applause, accolades, and sympathy she craved, but a revelation of the real life going on behind the fictional life she pretends on the internet to lead: the life of a CEO and film producer, the doyenne of an international charity, the life of maids, of beautifully decorated homes, of hobnobbing with public figures, of jet setting to and from Russia, of being praised by lawyers and judges for her fine work as a paralegal, of almost being herself a victim of 9/11.
When one initiates a public discourse of such a life, that person has to be prepared to have it scrutinized in public.
She just cannot grasp the fact that by discarding the shield of privacy herself, she cannot resummon that shield when she desires its protection from embarrassing revelations.
Of course, she is The Woman Who Sued Herself.
Oh, my dear Ms. Hamou / McConnell / Moran / Murphy. TWO of your roommates on Shellbark were arrested while living with you? Why, I've never heard of such a thing.
Who can possibly keep things clean and tidy when the police are trouping in and out of one's home? Although I have to say that with numerous animals in your house and a cat sitting by your bathroom lavatory, I suppose cleanliness is not really Job One in your home.
In any case, dearest, one cannot help worrying about you. You really should try to find a better class of roommates. Thieves, forgers, and drug addicts don't always pay the rent, you know. Or, better yet, don't take in roomers at all, my pet. It's just so very downmarket these days.
If you know what I mean.
RJ: Thank the Palace again for being so gracious to give Bob digital scans of the color plates of the Alexander Palace. Kotchumov's granddaughter Victoria is preparing them now for him! Bob is thrilled, and those together with the copies of the palace photos Kotchumov gave Bob may finally get that book written!
Ms P: you have no idea how "down" the market can be! Palmdale itself is about as low as one can go in Southern California, unless you go to Rosamond (NOT Rosemond which doesn't even exist lol). THEN add in a tow truck driver dragging ancient rusting wrecks of cars into the yard, fifty cats and a dozen parvo stricken dogs (as documented by Animal Control), and a string of drug dealer, convicted felon "friends" and "roomates"and the place strewn with trash and shipping containers...
Well, "Downton Abbey" it's not. More like "Down to the Abysmal" I should think. It gives new depths to "down market"...
FABULOUS Russian Christmas part last night. Amazing wines brought by wonderful friends and not a scrap of food left over. My Lithuanian style roast goose (Great Granda Lena's recipe, stuffed with tart apples and onion), my first Capon (the most "chickeny" chicken I've ever had) the Prime Rib, Russian Crab salad, and of course Salat Olivier, all were DEVOURED. My two days of cooking were so worth it. Thought of you all! Now I have a mountain of dishes and Wine glasses to wash...
"Snoopy" posted:
"Hey, didn't Rob and his Asshole friends snooped ...."
Didn't they snooped?
Snoopy's grammar and spelling is as bad as Sandman's which is as bad as Hamou's.
I wonder why that would be the case.
Oh, yeah. I keep forgetting.
Oh, brother.
Hamou is going on again about Moshein's saying she looked like a West Hollywood drag queen in that wedding dress getup as "Empress" Alexandra. She posted in all caps that he "ADMITS" it to a court, as if that means anything.
Well, of course he admitted it, nitwit. You do look like a drag queen in that photo.
You cannot go plastering the internet with pictures of yourself and then throw a hissy fit if people start expressing opinions on the pictures. Have you never seen the brilliant website, "Go Fug Yourself", where the hosts post pictures of celebrities and then rip the outfits to shreds? You don't even want to guess what those two girls would say about that photo of you if they got their hands on it. (We'd send them the photo, but you're not exactly the kind of celebrity they're looking for.)
And another thing. If you don't want people saying you live like trailer trash, then you probably shouldn't run around posting on the internet that both your roommates on Shellbark were arrested after the house was staked out by the police for weeks.
It makes you look pitiful instead of piteous. There's a difference, you know.
Yes I STILL ADMIT that photo of Hamou looks more like a bad West Hollywood Drag Queen than a Russian Empress. So what? She does.
Would she rather I express an opinion that Hamou looks more like a homeless Meth Whore these days?? I could...easily.
Hamou wrote: I did not have to fix anything at the Littlerock residence because I did not own the property but was merely a tenant,
So a DIRECT QUESTION: Exactly how much money did you pay between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2012 to Patrick O'Connor IN RENT AS HIS TENANT?
Hamou posted regarding Richman's getting a letter from Bob Atchison's attorney:
"I have forwarded this information to law enforcement"
Thanks for the help, Oma! Holding oneself out as a paralegal in California without adhering to the state requirements is not a civil offense. It's a criminal offense.
And perhaps you forget. He did not just write letters on your behalf as a paralegal to the Texas court. He also wrote a letter to the Federal District Court in Los Angeles, holding himself out as a paralegal.
It will be interesting to see if Mr. Richman can dig himself out of this one.
And thanks, too, for the link to the law firm. They appear to be the kind of place that means business when they take on a case.
But, of course, with Mr. Richman's fine legal skills on hand, I'm sure he'll be fine.
Or, more likely, he really wishes it was Bob Atchison who wrote those letters, as you tried to claim until you got found out.
THANK YOU OMA! You just MADE BOB'S ENTIRE CASE FOR HIM!
You just ADMITTED: Mr. Richman asked the court on my behalf to recall the civil bench warrant Bob Atchison got against me
THAT IS REPRESENTING YOU TO A COURT! THAT IS PRACTICING LAW WITHOUT A LICENSE! PARALEGALS ARE NOT PERMITTED IN CALIFORNIA TO DO ANYTHING FOR ANYONE OTHER THAN A LICENSED ATTORNEY!
OMA HAMOU JUST ADMITTED THAT ROBERT RICHMAN VIOLATED CALIFORNIA STATE LAW GOVERNING PARALEGALS!
Bob's lawyers already have a copy of that page with this admission.
THANKS!
Hamou posted:
"Having spoken with law enforcement concerning this matter"
Wow. Richman's mail must come really early if, before noon when Hamou posted about the letter, Richman had gotten the letter, communicated it to Hamou (and to Snoopy, too, of course), and she had already consulted with "law enforcement" and gotten their position on it.
I guess that's the advantage of being so well acquainted with "law enforcement". They just drop everything when they hear from Hamou.
Never having heard a peep from them myself about all these claims she's been making for years that they were breathing down our necks, I wouldn't know.
Of course, there is another possibility. Perhaps she is just lying about running to "law enforcement" with a letter suggesting that her friend Richman committed a crime. He might not be too happy about that.
Of course, that will probably pale against his reaction when he finds that Hamou is posting admissions that he was practicing law without a license.
What a pair of nitwits.
California Business and Professions Code 6450:
b.a paralegal shall not do the
following:
(1) Provide legal advice.
(2) Represent a client in court.
(3) Select, explain, draft, or recommend the use of any legal
document to or for any person other than the attorney who directs and
supervises the paralegal.
(5) Engage in conduct that constitutes the unlawful practice of
law.
(6) Contract with, or be employed by, a natural person other than an attorney to perform paralegal services.
Richman represented Hamou to the Court AS A PARALEGAL, Richman in her own words: asked the court on my behalf to recall the civil bench warrant Bob Atchison got against me
READ THE LAW. Hamou just ADMITTED Robert Richman violated these laws.
I do hope the police are aware of it.
As we continue to catalog some of Hamou's particularly cynical whoppers, we must remember to add to the list not only her disgusting 9/11 claims but also her claim that a Travis County Court Clerk told her that Bob Atchison wrote the two letters asking that the bench warrant be recalled and that the first request be removed from the file (and that the writer's name never be mentioned). She even tried to lend her claim more credibility by saying the clerk told her that the correspondence came in envelopes with Bob Atchison's return address.
Hamou obviously thought the court had honored the request to destroy the correspondence, leaving her free to lie about it to make whatever point she needed.
It must have rattled her badly to find out the court had, in fact, kept the correspondence along with the envelopes -- all of which showed Robert Richman as the author of the letters on Hamou's behalf.
We have saved her original posts, and we have certified copies of what is in the court's case file in Travis County.
Happy New Year, everybody!
I am leaving tomorrow for St. Petersburg, then London, and on to Israel to visit with the Kedems. Can't wait!
Today's outbursts over on Oma's blog are too hilarious, but I do want to point out one thing. I am aware that Mr. Pyles is a very wealthy individual --- the Pushkin people are very grateful to him and Bob for their recent work --- but he is not the only wealthy person in the room. I don't mean to brag, Oma, but international banking is a lucrative career if you are diligent and work hard. I was both.
That being said, whether it is Bob, Rob, Rebecca Jordan or the Man in the Moon paying for the lawyer fees, dear, hiring a lawyer is not a criminal act. It is the refusal to pay your lawyer that errs on the side of law-breaking, something with which you should be very familiar.
Find out where the barn is yet? I have vivid images of a huge red building being dragged around southern California.
I will be tweeting from Russia, but probably not posting. Looking forward to touring St. Petersburg itself, although with a little trepidation. My niece Leighton won't be with me this time, and I will be on my own in the midst of the Russian winter. Brr!
Take care, all.
Rebecca
One more time: I have never claimed that you kidnapped me in Idaho or Montana or wherever it was. You have never stolen my identity. I have never claimed you have. My name is Rebecca Jordan (which is a lot more credible than, say, "Snoopy", girlfriend). Father Markell did not provide you with any information. Father Markell never, ever wants to hear from you again.
You live on the internet. You have maintained a running battle with Bob Atchison for years. You claim that you are supported by your friends, and produce people with names like "Snoopy" and "Handmaiden" and Breadsticks, or whatever the hell her name was.
By your own admission, your "friends" have been what used to be called "jailbirds" in less politically correct times.
You attack people relentlessly.
I came late to this party. And there is a lot about the world of Russian history I do not understand, although I have to admit, I am finding it interesting. I'll tell you what I do understand, though. I know a con artist when I see one, and you, my dear . . .
Hamou asked:
"Can anyone tell me which law firm on behalf of Bob Atchison and Pallasart and The Rest of You Nut Cases do I send a copy of my RICO brief too?"
First, do you want to send a brief to someone or send a brief, too (meaning you want to send it in addition to something else)? It really would help us understand your drivel if you could use standard English. We're not all versed in hillbilly usage, you know.
Second, I'm astonished that a woman who has been involved in as many lawsuits as you have would not know by now how they are commenced. You file your suit with a court and serve the opponent with notice. Only then does the opponent decide on representation. And briefs are first registered by the court and then exchanged through the court, not directly between counsel.
Did I say astonished? Oh, I'm sorry. I forget I am addressing The Woman Who Sued Herself.
Hamou/McConnell wrote:
My friend who is sitting with me is frustrated that I am trying to reason with a sub human specie. He thinks it is ridiculous. I agree.
Webster's Dictionary:
Specie: noun. coined money; coin.
Well, Hamou's friend is probably right. Trying to reason with moneyis ridiculous, most especially by those who have no money, never HAD money, and owe so much money to so many PEOPLE ie: Hamou aka McConnell.
Speaking of nitwits, will someone kindly LEARN what a legal BRIEF actually means?
Black's Law Dictionary: Brief: A brief is submitted to lay out the argument for various petitions and motions before the court (sometimes called "points and authorities"), to counter the arguments of opposing lawyers, used in Appellate proceedings.
Oh, my dear Ms. Hamou / McConnell / Murphy / Moran. I do so understand your frustration with the trouble that nice Mr. Richman has gotten himself into on your behalf.
After all, who wouldn't want to avoid those ridiculous prices for real lawyers when one is in a scrape? A little legal help from an very independent-minded paralegal (if you know what I mean) for $35 an hour is just too good to resist now, isn't it, my pet?
But dearest, I could have told you that little stunt with writing the court a letter to ask that a warrant be recalled would not work. When I was at the reha -- er, on vacation -- I used to send postcards from my room -- er, suite -- to the hotel desk telling them I wanted to leave before my pre-paid stay ran out and I expected my money back.
Well, my loves, didn't that just blow up in my face. There were all kinds of procedures to go through and forms to file. And those desk clerks were mightily amused that I thought a postcard would turn the trick, so to speak.
I have to ask, though, dear. Why didn't you use your usual approach of hiring a real lawyer and then just not paying him? Look at all the times you have gotten legal help for free that way.
For a while, at least.
And, my sweet, I do wonder how you came across Mr. Richman in the first place. He seems to have learned his craft working in a North Hollywood legal center from a Mr. Fred Celani who was running his legal center from a Wisconsin prison.
And, dearest, that legal center's main client base was federal prison inmates! Can you even imagine it? I'm sure it would horrify you to be in such company, even unwittingly.
Always unwittingly, my sweet.
Thanks, Penelope, for that link to the L.A. Times article.
Did you notice the quote from Mr. Richman about what he told the FBI about his boss?
"They've been trailing him for years but letting him go about his business. He's been involved in mail fraud, wire fraud, scamming, God knows what else."
Yet, knowing what Celani's paralegal operation was involved in, Richman was working there.
Fraud and scamming? Well, at least Richman had the experience needed to handle some of his more recent clients.
This reminds me of Curt Baggett, Hamou's famous "handwriting expert" who has a very checkered history of his own, including convictions and having courts reject his claim to be an expert.
Is there some reason she keeps turning to such characters for assistance?
Perhaps she's just tired of having her legitimate lawyers sue her once they figure out they've been hit by a scam. She just needs someone who's a little more understanding with a shell game.
One has to wonder, actually, just "how" Oma/Alexandra MET this Richman character...
He has his profile PLASTERED all over the internet on various Jewish Dating sites! DatingJewishNow.com, JewishAmericanSingles.com, JewishPassions.com, JAmerica.com/dating, yjew.com... AND he's 65, so older than she is, her typical target...
hmmmmmm
I love watching Hamou log off then Snoopy log right in a few seconds later!
There's a hilarious Seventh Circuit case involving Fred Celani as plaintiff and Robert Richman and his then-wife Susan as defendants in which Celani described the Richmans as "transient tramps" and "hobos".
The parallels between that case and the nonsense Hamou blathers about these days kind of jump out at you.
Celani filed his case as a RICO action, which the court threw out. (Sound familiar?)
Celani claimed the Richmans "tricked" the a deputy sheriff into letting them haul away property that belonged to him. (Shades of the Great Rosamund Barn saga.)
The Richmans lodging with Celani's wife, apparently unable to afford a place of their own. (Ring any bells?)
It's remarkable how often Hamou's associates are themselves criminals (her two roommates on Shellbark), have a history of fraud (her "handwriting expert"), or have worked for and consorted with criminals (Richman).
She is either the unluckiest woman alive, or she finds her friends in really dodgy places.
I had to share the case. Too funny:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
Frederick George Celani, Plaintiff,
v.
Bekins Van Lines--Capital City Transfer, Inc., Ervin Bruner,
Richard A. Westley, Anthony Akright, RobertRichman, Susan Richman, and Thomas Dunphy, Defendants.
Case No. 90-C-944
The Opinion written by Thomas Curran, US District Court Judge:
"The complaint, which is twenty-five pages long without its attachments, is replete with accusations and legal conclusions. Wow, THAT is sounding familiar.It does appear, however, that in 1989, Celani's wife Mary was friends with Robert and Susan Richman, whom Celani characterizes as "transient-tramps" and hobos.
and it is a RICO case! This is becoming FAR too coincidental!
I like this line from the Judge's opinion, however...The court must find as a matter of law that the complaint is woefully deficient in stating a RICO claim. The plaintiff's assertion that the defendants' use of the mails and the telephone constitute predicate racketeering acts is frivolous.
Hamou posted:
"He [Bob Atchison] dragged this lawsuit and my conterlawsuit against him and Pallasart for another 3 years because of his dishonesty and his unwillingness to cooperate as the law requires."
Hoo, boy. This is some chutzpah.
How many times has a court issued a default judgment against Atchison because he ignored a summons to appear?
Zero.
How many times has a court issued a default judgment against Hamou because she ignored a summons to appear?
At least a dozen (with judgments accumulating to well above a half million dollars).
How many times has a court found Atchison in contempt?
Zero.
How many times has a court found Hamou in contempt?
Twice in her legal dealings with Atchison and once in her recent dealings with Refai.
How many bench warrants have been issued for Atchison's arrest for failure to appear?
Zero.
How many bench warrants have been issued for Hamou's arrest for failure to appear?
Three (at least that we know of in just the past few years).
How many times has Atchison been jailed for violating terms of probation?
Zero.
How many times has Hamou been jailed for violating terms of probation?
Two (at least).
Let's get real here. The one who shows an "unwillingness to cooperate as the law requires" is HAMOU.
This is yet another illustration of the extent to which she will go in distorting the truth in a futile attempt to carry a point.
Right up there with her claiming to have been on a flight from Boston to L.A. on 9/11.
Right up there with her claiming a court clerk told her Atchison sent those letters to the court -- letters which she knew Richman had sent at her behest.
The whoppers she is willing to tell about things that can so easily be proved otherwise are truly astonishing.
I guess that's what a deep pathological disorder combined with desperation gets you.
Blake,
One more important point. EVERY SINGLE CONTINUANCE TO EXTEND THE TRIAL DATE IN THE TEXAS LITIGATION WAS REQUESTED BY HAMOU!
SHE moved for a continuance to extend the trial date only a few days BEFORE the trial itself, which was DENIED by Judge Livingston, and then ON THE DAY OF TRIAL she tried to DELAY again, which was DENIED by Judge Triana.
Lets look at "unwillingness to cooperate as the law requires":
A District Court Judge signed an order requiring Hamou to schedule and appear at a deposition in Austin Texas no later than September 3, 2011 to disclose her assets, finances, and employment information, and she was further ORDERED to comply by providing the requested financial, employment and asset documentation to Mr. Atchison no later than August 20, 2011. She did nothing. She WAS HELD ORDERED AS IN CONTEMPT OF COURT for refusing to comply AS THE LAW REQUIRED
She was ORDERED BY FEDERAL BANKRUPTCY COURT JUDGE ROBLES TO APPEAR FOR EXAMINATION, TWICE. Yet SHE REFUSED TO COMPLY AS THE LAW REQUIRED.
Wow, what a lying hypocrite she is...
Yes, and how many times did she blow off Creditor Meetings that the bankruptcy court ordered?
Three, wasn't it?
And how many times did Bob Atchison's counsel show up at those meetings as required?
Three, wasn't it?
And this is not to mention the orders to file missing schedules which which she never complied.
That is why Judge Robles finally dismissed her bankruptcy petition, thereby stripping her of the shield against the California and Texas bench warrants that had caused her to seek bankruptcy protection in the first place.
I can't wait to find out tomorrow who the supervising attorney was for Richman's work for Hamou.
Or do you suppose he will try to dance around on the head of a pin and ramp up the delaying tactics?
Of course, what could be a reason for delay? It is the simplest of questions: who is your supervising attorney?
Snoopy-Who-Is-Oma posted:
"Oma when she was in bankruptcy"
Hamou was not in bankruptcy. She petitioned the court to grant her bankruptcy status, and that petition was dismissed when she failed to comply with the document production required and to attend the mandatory Creditor Meetings.
As usual, Hamou deliberately blurs the line between filing for something and actually prevailing in getting it.
It'll be interesting to see if she tells her next landlord (if she finds one) that she is a bankrupt.
Oh, well. He or she will find out soon enough that she doesn't have a pot to piss in. They always do.
Then they'll get in touch with us, and we'll all be off to the races again.
Meanwhile, another house will bite the dust.
It's the cycle of life, Oma style.
Hamou posted:
"When I look for a new place to live, I will be sure to inform any new landlord about their oppressive and vindictive presence in my life and of the police investigations I have instigated against each and every one of them."
Have at it. It will certainly make you look like a tenant any landlord would be delighted to let in.
Then later, when the checks bounce, the excuses start to flow, and finally even the pretense of intending to pay rent evaporates, they will look you up on the internet, talk to your prior landlords, and start wringing their hands at their gullibility in falling for your schtick in the first place.
Then they'll find their house trashed, scrutinized by Public Health and Animal Control, with animals run amok, the yard full of old furniture, and your doings the object first of neighborhood scorn and then of anger.
Five landlords down. Who's up next?
Every landlord looking at a prospective tenant will want REFERENCES from previous landlords. I don't NEED to contact anyone. All the landlord has to do is contact your PREVIOUS landlords for the references. So let's see...
Patrick O'Connor: NO RENT PAID for 18 months. Totally trashed house, animal control complaints, health code violations...hmmm. No that won't be good.
Eric Cown: NO RENT PAID, Unlawful detainer filed, check faked in court...Hamou goes "to the bank to get a real copy" and never comes BACK to Court...House trashed...
No, no help here.
Huiku Batchelor: Forged check on a closed account. Felony Charges filed and pressed by the DA. Dozens of animals abandoned in the house while Hamou/McConnell sits in JAIL.
No help here...
Charlane Chipi: NO RENT PAID, house trashed, set on fire. Unlawful Detainer filed....
Wow, we're back over five years now. No, the rental history for lack of decent references from Hamou's landlords speaks for itself. Loudly and in volumes.
Hmmm. I wonder what Barringer Legal Services was doing reading the blogs about Hamou.
One of their services is document retrieval from the Travis County Courthouse. Could she have been fishing around to see if someone could make those letters from Richman go missing from the case file?
You know -- the letters she falsely claimed Bob Atchison wrote and whose envelopes bore Atchison's return address.
No matter. The court keeps everything in a digital database now, and Atchison already has certified hard copies from the court.
Hamou posted:
"the unlawful detainer which was filed was dismissed because she [Sharlane Chipi] took the money."
You eventually paid Huiki Batchelor, too, under threat of prison.
But the questions are:
WHY did Sharlane Chipi have to file an unlawful detainer action to get rent from you?
WHY did Eric Cowan have to file an unlawful detainer action (though he still did not get paid)?
WHY did Huiku Batchelor have to get you arrested and threaten you with prison to get rent and damages from you?
WHY did Patrick O'Connor have to file an unlawful detainer action (though he still did not get paid)?
Are you really so stupid as to think your actions are defensible?
Or are you really so stupid as to think tenants should only pay rent under threat of legal proceedings?
Or are you really so stupid as to think tha,t just because a landlord got tired of laying out money for legal fees in order to get his rent that once you fled the premises he dropped the legal action, that means you were a model tenant?
Or are you really so stupid as to think any landlord would take you as a tenant if he knew your history of non-payment, theft of fixtures, and property destruction?
Or are you really just so stupid?
Blake,
She uses the con game of "I paid X dollars in RENT!" without ADMITTING that "X dollars" is NOT THE FULL AMOUNT OF RENT OWED.
That's the con she pulled on Patrick. She paid a little bit up front as part of opening escrow, moved in and then NEVER PAID HIM ANOTHER DIME IN RENT! Why do you think she never answers my question of HOW MUCH RENT she paid to live in Patrick's house for the entire year of 2012? The answer is ZERO.
Same with the others (except Batchelor where her up front checks were FORGED on CLOSED ACCOUNTS, and she was forced to pay VICTIM RESTITUTION or go to trial for the FELONY.)
Yes she is that stupid, worse she thinks other people are that stupid too. It seems finally her pool of scam victims is getting wise to her sordid history.
Hamou posted:
" I also paid in excess of $7,000 for rent [of O'Connro's house] and other things"
Nitwit. You just proved the point Rob Moshein made in the prior post that you do not pay all your rent.
You have lived in O'Connor's house for at least 18 months. You posted that you paid O'Connor around $7,000 for rent and other things.
Even assuming the full $7,000 was paid for rent, that comes out to $389 a month for a house on two acres.
I know the area you haunt is a hell hole. But rent of $389 a month?
What a dope.
Blake,
The escrow agreement shows that Hamou was supposed to pay Patrick $1000 a month, starting Feb. 1, 2011. She was Patrick's tenant, in her own admission, until the Trustee's sale in December 2012. That makes her liable for rent in the amount of $23,000 for her 23 MONTHS occupying the property.
So, let her show her fabricated "receipts" for $7,000. She was obligated to pay far far more. She can't weasel out of that.
Hamou-who-is-Snoopy posted:
"Wonder if the voices on the other end of the tape recordings made on that night turns out to be both Patrick O'Connor and this Rick Asshole on the other end? Hey wait didn't that Rick dude tell Oma he was on vacation with his family and didn't know anything about her barn being removed and pretended to be just as shocked as she was? Yeh, he did."
Oh, brother. There's extra fruit in the fruitcake today.
Hamou you can't "prove" anyone named Rick contacted me or Patrick, because NEITHER OF US have the slightest clue who or what you are talking about.
I CAN prove is that somebody who is NOT named Rick emailed me saying you were trying to pull the same scam on him to buy his house that you pulled on Patrick, down to even presenting him with the same tax returns and credit report...and that he said you had told him you were renting a house in Rosamond.
but, his name, again is NOT Rick.
I'm certain HE won't mind showing up in court though to tell his story.
So let me get this straight. Hamou is now posting that this despicable "Rick" who stole her barn is ...........
A friend of her long-time housemate Steve Lee?!
You'd think that after having the police stake out the Chipi house she squatted in and having two of her housemates arrested, she'd have learned something about how to pick her associates.
I guess not.
You'd also think she'd realize that publicizing the fact that she associates with forgers, drug dealers, and the like already makes her look ridiculous enough, and that now publicizing that she also associates with barn thieves does not enhance her battered public image.
I guess not.
Hamou has squatted in so many houses that it's difficult to keep them straight.
It was the house on Shellbark, not the Chipi house, that was staked out by the police who hauled off two of her housemates.
My bad.
Hello from London! Just got back to the hotel after a fabulous dinner with friends at a restaurant in Bayswater. I am exhausted after five days in Petersburg, but it was a terrific visit. Terrific! Tomorrow I am hitting the National Gallery and doing some shopping. I can't tell you how much I am looking forward to a few relaxing days with the Kedems.
Meanwhile, I am riveted by the ongoing saga of Nancy Drew and the Missing Red Barn, RIVETED!. Who is Rick? Rob, we need programs.
So is "Snoopy" (a moment while I try and stop laughing) on the trail of these dastardly thieves? Oh, the excitement! I can see him now, a deerstalker hat, Meerschaum pipe and magnifying glass, poring over the tracks left by the mysterious green truck!
Girlfriend, don't stop! I'm begging you!
Pip pip and cheerio,
RJ
Honey, I just looked down at my lady parts and they are all where they are supposed to be, so sorry to disappoint you, but I'm a girl. Would you like to swap stories about yeast infections or something?
Girlfriend, you really are a hillbilly, aren't you? First of all, there are the constant homophobic swipes. You don't have to be a gay man to dislike you --- although after all of your rants about gays, it's hard to imagine one who would like you --- just ask Ms. Chipi, Ms. Morton, Ms. Batchelor, Ms. Van Veen, Ms. Refai,Ms. Biernat, Ms. Lady Down the Street Whose Name I Don't Remember, Irinia, Sveta (just met her, and goodness, she's not a fan), and all of the Kedem sisters. That's a lot of estrogen that doesn't like you.
Now let's talk about straight men who can't stand you: all of your lawyers by the time you have finished with them, Mr. Refai, Mr. O'Connor, Mr. Cowan, Mr. Batchelor, Mr. Morton, Mr. Demian, and probably most men who have interacted with you and then realized they had been taken to the cleaners.
Then there are the assorted "friends" who drop in an out of this story, and in and out of jail. I know you think of yourself as the Ministering Angel to Those Who Deserve a Chance, but the fact is, most of your "friends" seem to be fellow con artists, grifters and shady characters. If they aren't, they seem to cut you loose as soon as they can.
You have what might be described as a "checkered" past in the personal relationships department as well, dear.
Thank God for "Snoopy" (I can't stop laughing!) At least he's stayed with you through thick and thin. Mostly thick, to judge from the pictures.
RJ
Oh, Rebecca, my dear. How lovely your trip sounds, even if it did leave you a little kaputt.
But I know you can kick off the heels a bit with the Kedems when you get there. Speaking of the Kedems, I saw just the prettiest bottle of Kedem grape juice at Trader Joe's the other day. Same family?
Of course, with Bitsy, Mitzi, Nitzi, Ditzy, and Fritzi here so much of the time, one does have to wonder whether there can be any of the clan left back in the Heimat.
Tschuß, my sweet.
Mrs. P.
Dear Penelope,
It is the same Kedem from what I understand. And dear, only Bitsy and Nitzi live in Southern California! You should try and meet up for a watercress luncheon one of these days!
Best,
Rebecca
I'm off to bed, there's a long day ahead tomorrow. But her last post is her best, isn't it? "Look, everyone, I paid Mr. Morton part of what I owed him!" "I paid Patrick something!" Can't you give a girl a break?
Sandman-who-is-Oma posted:
"Ms. Hamou ....... abused by a sadist who was also a child molestor"
So let's see.
Two of Hamou's housemates were arrested after the police staked out the house for days.
Her current housemate's friend stole her barn.
Her friend Traci Anne Schlosser is a repeat arrestee for substance abuse.
Her benefactor Hamid Refai is, at least according to her, a drug-using, whore-chasing, perjuring rapscallion.
She married a child-molesting sadist.
Boy, does this woman know how to pick 'em or what?
No one has this much bad luck in hooking up with losers unless there is something fundamentally wrong with where and how she goes about meeting them.
Maybe she should try ChristianMingle.com for a change of pace. She could use that cheesy shot of her kneeling in front of that font in a used prom dress with a studied expression of beatific peace on her face. Maybe she'll snag someone without an arrest record for a change. (And without much of a brain, either.)
Examine "what" Hamou/McConnell says about her life. Notice "patterns"? I do.
She insists:
Her FATHER, Jackie, was abusive and molested her...
Her first husband Marcus was abusive. He "raped" her at gunpoint..
She was RAPED, at least three times (we have her saying so recorded, remember the rapists who talked about the blogs while raping her?)
Patrick was "threatening"...
She insisted Father Markell raped her, we have her emails...now she recants that. She also INSISTED he stole from her....
What an "unbelievable" tale of abuse, molestation, threats and violence.
One really MUST wonder what choices someone makes to live such a "Perils of Pauline" life
Oma/Alexandra or whatever alias you use these days. YOU are the one who wrote PUBLICLY on the internet for the world to read that your Father Jackie MOLESTED and ABUSED you. Remember? You insisted HE was the reason you as a "child" of at least 18 headed to Hollywood with a dolly and clothes in a paper bag.
Poor Nola is dying of cancer. Is she happy you did that? Is Keith or Crystal?
did you even bother to TELL them you wrote these things for the world to see?
Oma, I NEVER "harassed" your Mother, or anyone else in your family.
YOU wrote THIS ON YOUR WEBSITE FOR THE WORLD TO READ:
Growing up she suffered from poverty and child abuse. Often there was not enough food to feed six hungry children and many times they went to bed without dinner. Some holidays were bleak as others gathered around the Christmas tree to open gifts, Oma and her siblings had nothing to offer except for gifts that they had made by hand. She worked odd jobs such as cleaning homes and at the local A & W restaurant as a waitress to help support her family during her father's long absence away from home. To escape her abusive father she boarded a Greyhound bus to Hollywood, California with only a paper sack as a suitcase. This small frail child, wearing only a sailor dress, saddle shoes clutched tightly to the brown paper bag - all of her worldly possessions were inside of this brown bag. A doll, two pairs of jeans and some under garments.
Don't feign indignation when someone questions or looks into what YOU WROTE ABOUT YOUR PARENTS, NOLA AND JACKIE, ON YOUR WEBSITE FOR THE WORLD TO READ.
YOU accuse them of abuse, tolerating your abuse and raising YOU in POVERTY. THESE ARE YOUR WORDS
Hamou brings up "contempt" of the legal system.
Oma Hamou has been found IN CONTEMPT OF COURT FOUR TIMES.
She mentions Judge Lora Livingston. It was Judge Lora Livingston who FOUND OMA HAMOU IN CONTEMPT OF COURT AND JUDGE LIVINGSTON SIGNED THE BENCH WARRANT DEMANDING HAMOU'S ARREST FOR HER CONTEMPT OF COURT!
and the website is "omahamou.com" so YOU are RESPONSIBLE for the words that say your father Jackie N. McConnell was ABUSIVE to you, and your mother Nola Harvey McConnell did NOTHING about it such that YOU "ran away" from the ABUSE.
YOU are responsible for these words Hamou. Nobody else put them out there.
Here's further proof that Hamou is a hillbilly born and bred. She posted:
"I discovered that Oma’s great-great grandfather ..... was born in St. Petersburg and in 1916, and at the age of 5 years old arrived to America together with his parents."
A great-great grandfather born in 1911 and she born in 1963.
That means that four generations of her ancestors were squeezed into a mere 52 years, which in turns means that, on average, her ancestors were having babies at the age of 13.
And it gets even better.
Her father was born in 1946. So that means that the span between him and the 1911 ancestor three generations back was just 35 years -- or an average age of less than 12 when they produced babies.
West Virginia meets the Neva.
Or maybe she was just lying about the whole scenario. Sort of like when she flew from Boston to L.A. on 9/11.
Darling, that can't be right. Why don't you figure it out on the basis of each generation having a baby when they are eighteen. Of course, that would make Oma 72.
Goodness, darling. She's not going to like that!
Really, Bitsy. Under 12?
Sorta gives the term "baby mama" a whole different meaning.
Hamou posted:
"Since this [having children at age 13] was common back in the day your point is irrelevant."
It could not have been too common, since early in the last century the average age of female puberty was 17. Only in recent years has the age declined.
Or did your noble ancestors just start doing it earlier than everyone else?
And we are talking not just about the supposed 1911 birth but about five generations of births spanning the years 1911-1963. Exactly where was having children at the age of 13 common throughout most of the 20th century?
Other than Appalachia, of course.
Hamou also posted:
"humilate me by saying my ancestors are of low class that they would propriate at a ridicuously young age."
Propriate?
I rest my case.
Well, her family DID start early. Jackie McConnell and Nola M. Harvey were both MINORS when married in 1962. He was 18, she 16 and both had to have their parent's permission on the marriage license.
She claims the Russian bit through her mother's family, the Harveys. Well, by 1962, Harold Harvey, Nola's father was dead, but Sarrah was still alive.
So, Nola's being born in 1946, means that Sarah and Harold HAD to have been born 1925-1930.
THEIR parents had to have been born 1905-1910.
OOPSIE, not enough steps here for that "Russian" one born in 1911, even computing the hillbilly propensity to procreate at 16-18...
Sorry but another Hamou Tall Tale bites the dust. Wonder where that Cherokee found its way into Boone County West Virginia?? Must have gotten lost.
Before Hamou screams about stalking and lying, all of this information is PUBLIC online now, genealogy is a huge deal now. Ancestry.com is full of people researching claims. West Virginia has its archives online.
Here is the page of the marriage license, available to anyone online showing what I said is quite true:
http://www.wvculture.org/vrr/va_view.aspx?Id=12731366&Type=Marriage
Years ago when Hamou was posting these absurd lies about her ancestry being Russian and other such nonsense you could get away with it because the records weren't online. Even Cherokee ancestry can be easily traced these days.
If Hamou is really Cheerokee or Russian all she has to do is post the names and dates of birth - or emigration in the case of the Russians - everything is online and can easily be proven by Hamou.
Of course Hamou won't do it - it's all lies and a part the phoney grandiose narcissist life story she has fabricated.
Oma called me a "lying sack of shit" because I repeated that she claimed to have been raped!
Well, here ya go Oma from YOUR OWN FORUM:
Postby Mike on Tue May 12, 2009 9:40 am
The open secret of was Oma raped, raped directly because someone believed the words of Bob’s story about her and the stuff on the web about her is true and documented. That they who attacked, beat and raped her taunting her with Bob’s words while raping her saying that they had read the words on the Blogs and she deserved this because she uses men and cheats people like their blog says she does is also documented. Rob’s Blog is also documenting the attitude around Rob and their attitudes of all women deserve it when they get raped and how they laugh at Oma for being raped. The police report about these events also documents that the words on the web in the various Blogs were believed and this is why her pets and animals that she had rescued were literally murdered and why what happened to her in the aftermath happened...As an aftermath Oma did get pregnant from that rape and for moral reasons and respect for life kept the baby rather than aborting it. She had complications and ended up losing the baby in a premature birth.
Postby Mike on Wed May 13, 2009 9:22 am
Someone read Bob’s story on the web and she was attacked, beaten and raped while having Bob’s words thrown in her face. Now we find Rob and those commenting on HIS Blog laughing at this. Oma did not sleep last night because of reliving this and in anger and fear over what was on Rob’s Blog, she had begged us to not say anything about the rape as it was so personally devastating and she did not want to have to relive and relive it, time and time again.
by Sandman on Thu May 14, 2009 2:27 pm Snoopy says his friend, Oma was raped he goes on to say "someone" murdered Hamou's animals and does not say the rapist did this. These are two separate events which Snoopy says happened in the life of his friend.
by Snoopy on Wed May 27, 2009 7:35 am Now, getting back to the rape part of your post on Rob's blog, o.k. where on this forum did I Justin Edwards say it was because of Rob Oma was raped hmmmm, post it, I said the people who hurt my friend told her they read his blog you know the Oma Hamou Reality blog, they told her they believed the little man and Bob, that's all I said. I also said someone else who read Bob/Rob's blogs in a police report says this they read the blogs and believed they were dealing with a con artist and murdered Oma's animals,
So. Just WHO is the lying sack of shit Oma? Not me....
And all of those screen names are Hamou herself. She knows, we know it and everybody else knows it. Hamou doesn't care. It's all a part of the fake narcissistic story she has clothed herself in, mostly for her own self-edification, to make her feel important, loved, beautiful, smart, etc...
Hamou says she had Russian researchers who discovered her Russian roots - a huge whopping lie from someone who has made a career inventing stories to defraud people.
Am I wrong? Well, prove it's true by posting what they supposedly found. Give us names and dates. All US immigration records are online and we can check it in a few minutes.
Hamou won't because she just made it up. She recklessly lied figuring nobody could verify it but she has been caught again.
As a sociopathic narcissist Hamou has no remorse and feels no guilt in any lie she tells.
Sorry, Hamou, both carpets were delivered are in storage waiting to be installed when the rooms are ready - verified a few weeks ago direct from the palace.
Oh, and the palace publicly thanked him for them again a month ago! he is one their top donors in the USA.
Boy, calling Hamou out on the lies about her ancestry have really put her panties in a wad today.
Of course, I guess when all one's noble ancestors were getting pregnant pretty much the day they entered puberty, there were bound to be some copying errors in the DNA.
But I'm intrigued by her claim that it was "common" among the Russian nobility to bear children in their early teen years. I have looked back as far as the 18th century and been unable to find any such cases.
Perhaps she can cite some examples of Russian nobles born to 13-year-old mothers? Maybe it was the rural nobility. The very rural nobility.
Or perhaps she was just sloppy again in fabricating one of her tall tales -- such as what happened when she forgot to check the flights on 9/11. Or such as what happened when she didn't realize the Travis County Court had saved the letters and envelopes from Richman.
Hamou posted:
"I have not only the above receipt but I have a letter from Dr. Ivan Petrovich Sautov who says this is where Enigma’s money went towards."
Wow! $4300 to help restore a Russian palace. I mean WOW!
They must be eternally grateful.
(Just how many times over the years has Hamou trotted out that letter to prove she was a major benefactress to Russian restoration efforts? Perhaps she thinks that by posting the letter 20 times it makes the contribution 20 times larger. After all, that's the way she calculates her rent payments: pay once, post about it, and repeat posts monthly.)
Harold James Harvey died in West Virginia in 2003. He was a coal miner and carpenter. Nola's father was BORN in 1914! Must have been one heck of a family that managed to bear two generations in only 3 years...
Yes, Blake, and I wonder what further donations were made by Hamou - NONE.
$4300 and that was it.
Maybe Oma's mythical Russian ancestors were mysterious coal miners from the Dombass
Harold's father, Alonzo, was born in 1884 in West Virginia....still no Russians.
HIS father Jasper was born in 1853 in West Virginia, Jasper's wife Anetta Ferguson was born in West Virginia in 1852...STILL no Russians.
Regarding Hamou's $4300 payment to the Alexander Palace, she posted:
"Dr. Sautov's letter does say words to this effect [about their eternal gratitude] how nice you also recognize this."
Oh, yeah. Exactly where are those "words to this effect"? Point them out to us. I've read the letter twice and cannot find any reference to their gratitude, eternal or otherwise.
That letter was a receipt for a payment you made to get a space cleaned out for your own use. Sautov acknowledged the payment and said the palace would provide verification that the money had been spent for that purpose.
It is a simple document about an arms length business transaction relating to a film project that collapsed in a puff of ponzi smoke.
So, Hamou -- point out the "words to that effect" expressing anyone's eternal gratitude.
Never claimed she was a major benefactor? Looks like Hamou has forgotten this huge lie:
Legendary Russian Monuments To Be Restored.
An American Woman Teams with St. Petersburg Officials in a multi-million dollar restoration of the Historic Alexander Palace, the Fedorovsky Little Town & the Imperial Cathedral of Russia’s Last Czar.
Oma Hamou the CEO and President of ENIGMA ROYAL FILMS, an independent film company, has long been interested in the restoration of these historical monuments to use as the backdrop for her feature film, “As A Matter of Honour” portraying the lives of the last Czar of Russia and his family.
“As A Matter of Honour”, presents the indelible true story of enigmatic Imperial Russia. This stunning combination of vivid and extraordinary storytelling creates a breathtaking epic. It is a film that will illuminate the strength and triumph of the human spirit. Both thought provoking and powerful, it tells the story of a great nation, it’s eloquent traditions and of a family, whose fingerprints were almost erased, until now.
Enigma re-creates Imperial Russia with the assistance of cutting edge visual imagination. There are many kinds of things that are happening in the film between the miniature works, the Cinema Graphics and the matte-painting environments in addition to the personal effects that each character expresses.
Despite disastrous political errors and world events during the reign of Czar Nicholas II, the spiritual gifts of the Orthodox faith that sustained his family through a period of ultimate tragedy have inspired millions around the world. The film project together with the restoration demonstrates both the heritage and the vibrancy of the Russian Orthodox Church in modern Russia. What the film will help to clarify is where these spiritual gifts came from.
The relationship between Emperor Nicholas II and the Empress Alexandra Feodorvna has been repeatedly the subject of films and books. None have drawn the information from the individuals themselves. The explosive events that led up to their final days and the beginning of one of the darkest chapters in human history.
“For years it has been a story that has tugged at my heart and as a film producer the responsibility of making a film such as this is daunting as it is both creative and emotionally challenging. “As A Matter of Honour”, is about honoring those who lost their lives, their identities, and to the memory of Imperial Russia”.
While writing the screenplay for this inspiring project, it became evident to OMA that the film should be made in Russia at the actual site locations. This would become a tremendous challenge. Many of her colleagues and peers didn’t believe such an idea was feasible let alone possible. Here was an American woman who had never been to Russia, did not speak the language and was traveling to Russia alone.
Facing the fear of being in a foreign country, the uncertainty of the outcome, she spent seven months in Russia. With an indomitable spirit and her desire to tell this true story accurately, she successfully negotiated for the privilege to film at these magnificent historical monuments.
Having obtained the permission and support, Enigma was able to allocate funds to help restore much of these deteriorating monuments in order to recreate the time period for the film’s backdrop. OMA felt that by displaying these beautifully restored cultural treasures in her film would enable an international audience to see the incredible historical value it gives to the world.
“Pulling everything together is an extremely difficult and tedious endeavor. With my faith in God and my belief in this film project, I was able to substantiate Enigma’s Russian partnership with the State Museum and the Russian Orthodox Church. We will be the first Western production company allowed to film inside of the Alexander Palace, and at the other historical sites”.
Work has already begun on these extensive restoration projects. It will encompass the exterior and interior of the palace, its grounds, and historic buildings in the vicinity. Interior works will focus on the magnificent parade rooms of the palace and the private suites of Nicholas II and his wife Alexandra. The dismantling and removing of current existing equipment from the Formal Suite of Rooms in the Alexander Palace as well the extensive restoration of both the exterior and interior of the Fedorovsky Cathedral which have already begun.
Enigma anticipates that the majority of the restoration will be completed within 55 weeks. “It has been our goal to see these wonderful interiors restored back to their original beauty in 1917,” said OMA, "We are committed with our Russian colleagues to recreate the beauty, opulence and intimacy of these rooms. Because there is really nothing like them in the world, they document a unique époque and a way of life that continues to inspire and fascinate. Restoring the Fedorovsky Little Town and the Cathedral is especially sacred to me. It represents on a personal note, my commitment to God and to the Church. It is my way of saying thank you to God for such an awesome opportunity. I believe that when the gold is replaced upon the Cathedral’s dome, it will be as a light to the world. A new era reminding us all that the heart of the candle still burns brightly in Russia despite those who had tried in vain to snuff it out. God never left and the fingerprints of this incredible history still exists today”.
The film project combined with the restoration projects will be a great achievement of this joint effort.
“I feel very fortunate to be able to help make this happen. Seeing the restoration of the Alexander Palace, the Imperial Cathedral and the Fedorovsky Little Town has been a dream of many people around the world, including my Russian colleagues and myself. It is a very exciting time for all of us who are participating in this great effort. I’d like people to remember that the relationship between Russia and America dates back as early as the birth of the U.S. and the reign of Russia’s Empress Catherine II. Russia’s fabric is woven into a beautiful multi-colored tapestry that is rich in its heritage, its traditions, and in its people as a nation”.
“When I first met OMA I told her that her passion, tenacity, and steadfast desire to fight for the rights of the underdog defied the odds”, said Mr. Vakulenko a colleague of OMA’s. “ The fact that one woman’s passion could have such a positive effect on many people around her is amazing to me. As a native of Russia it brings great joy to know that our history and its traditions will be remembered. One of the things about her film project is that the story is invested with real emotions, real lives, about real people. To film on site at the actual location and to tell it in the way that she does is very powerful”.
“Producing this film has neither been easy or glamorous. I am constantly in the trenches, pouring my heart and soul into this project while taking substantial risks all for the “sake of art”. I realize the importance of the restoration projects and of a film of this caliber and the extreme damage it can do if it is not done with honor, truth and in clarity. I believe that the past must embrace the present in order for of us to understand and thereby move forward. I believe that “As A Matter of Honour”, will help to build that bridge. I believe in the truth of our past, as it deserves to be heard not in the words of a filmmaker, but in the words of the very people whose lives we portray in our film not as history has written but as a matter of honor”.
Rob, any cherokees yet?
Hamou made the following claim on the Press Release she published on her website called "The Marriage Between History & Hollywood" published August 12, 2003, is she outlining the $4300 she raised and gave the palace. Wow, such a HUGE effort for $4300.00:
Funds for the restoration efforts have been appropriated from the film's production budget through the "Sarskaia Foundation". Through The Sarskaia Foundation's efforts, additional funds have been raised through corporate sponsors and US government grants.
No matter how difficult the challenges have been the objective is the economic and social development of the St. Petersburg region. It is about creating jobs and improving the lives of the community. Amongst the support from the different Government organizations from both America and Russia, Ms. Oma Hamou has also sought the advice and assistance from Development Financial Institutions such as the World Bank, Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC) and other nonprofit Foundations.
Anetta's parents Daniel and Livona were born in 1824-25 in VIRGINIA..
Still no Russians, or American Indians for that matter
Well, so far NO Russians or Indians in the McConnells back to 1700s, OR Oma Ree Murphy's (back to 1700s) OR the Harveys. Not looking good for Sarah Elizabeth Harvey's family yet either...
That uses up all those grandparents...so far, coal miners, abound. No Russians or nobility...certainly not Sitting Bull either. I know where a Pile o Bull is though.
All Hamou has to do is post the names of just ONE of her Russian ancestors who moved to US. She can't because it was just another lie.
There are no Russian researchers and there are no Russians in her mother's line or anywhere else in her tree.
Oma Hamou, you are the criminal who dreamed up and conducted this Enigma/Saarskaia fraud, not me. I have won a judgment against you and an active Texas arrest warrant has been issued against you in my case.
All of the judgments have been issued against you, not me.
I have won against you every time, every judge and jury has supported me. I know who you are and what you are. I have nothing but contempt for you and your actions. You are a dangerous convicted felon who has no moral boundaries or guilt for your actions or their effect on others.
You should be ashamed of what you have done, but as a sociopath and narcissist you are incapable of normal human emotions.
I just tried to slog through all of Hamou's rantings over the past two days. It's tough going, and for those who are not used to her hillbilly English, here is a brief translations guide:
geanological means genealogical
attorny means attorney
too means to (as used)
idiocity means idiocy
companies means company’s (as used)
rediret means redirect
ilks means ilk’s (as used)
reccommend means recommend
ridicuously means ridiculously
ancestoral means ancestral
eronious means erroneous
humilate means humiliate
panites means panties
baptisim means baptism
consumate means consummate
judtice means justice
purient means prurient
propriate means procreate
linage means lineage
perservations mean preservation
scruillous means scurrilous
it’s means its (as used)
volumious means voluminous
theif means thief
You're on your own with her incorrect punctuation, run-on sentences, and missing words, as they're just too prevalent to list.
Now Hamou is dragging out yet again that years-old correspondence from Peter Kurth, commiserating with her. She calls him a "well known author".
Yes. Well-known for having been taken in by Anna Anderson's hoax. Also known for spending weeks in a British jail after being drunk on an airplane and becoming abusive to flight attendants.
As I've said, she really knows how to pick 'em.
But, according to Hamou (who's posting again as Snoopy), Kurth was "raped nearly non-stop until he was finally freed".
Ouch. Raped non-stop for five weeks. This guy gets raped more than Hamou, and that's a full schedule.
Not a good idea to get out of control on an airplane, huh?
Blake
Raped in jail for five weeks may have been just a vacation for him.
Lord knows "she" views rape as a routine sport.
"Perpetitude"?
What in the hell is she trying to say? The closest word would be perpetude, which means in perpetuity. But that makes no sense in the context in which she used it. Was she perhaps reaching for the word "rectitude" but just found it beyond the grasp of her hobbled vocabulary?
This is beyond the reach of my experience with her hillbilly dialect.
Hamou, why don't you try standard English for once? It would help us decipher your sputterings.
And if you don't want Kurth to be ridiculed for his stint in prison, perhaps you ought not to post such nonsense as his being raped "almost non-stop" during a five-week stay. I can't imagine he would be happy about it.
Same thing with claiming your great-great grandfather was born in 1911. Or that you are descended from Russian aristocrats. Or that your phantom flight from Boston to L.A. on 9/11 caused you barely to escape death. Or that Bob Atchison wrote letters to the court that you had someone else write.
You bring this ridicule on yourself and those associated with you with your barrage of lies and nonsense.
But I must say you've kept us all entertained the past couple of days at a pitch seldom attained even by you.
Blake
Add "moral perpetitude" to the list of Oma Hamou's Hillbilly meaningless vocabulary, meant to impress other illiterate hillbilly idiots ie: her peer group
One of her wildest lies is that I flew to LA, stole her cell-phone and impersonated her on that call she had with Dun & Bradstreet.
From their report:
10/16/2000
In previous interviews with Oma Hamou, principal, it was indicated that Enigma Royal Films LLC started in 1999 and operates as a film production company with 100 employees. It was further indicated that the company operates from the residence of Oma Hamou with a 5,362 square foot three story building in the rear of the property. In addition, it was indicated that the company is in the process of leasing space at 100 Universal City Plaza Drive, Universal City, CA (Universal Studios Inc). A phone number of (818) 349-3736 was also provided. She further indicated that she is a member of the California Attorney's For Criminal Justice.
A check with the Delaware Secretary of State on Oct 10, 2000 shows that the company is registered as a limited liability company as of Sep 14, 2000. A check with the California Secretary of State on Oct 9, 2000 revealed no record of the company registered as a foreign limited liability company to conduct business in the state of California. A check with the Los Angeles County Business Licensing Department records as of Apr 15, 2000 revealed no record of the required license for the company. In addition, a check with the Los Angeles County Registrar/Recorder Office on Oct 10, 2000 revealed no record of Enigma Royal Films LLC registered as a fictitious name in the county. Also, a check with the California Attorney's For Criminal Justice on Oct 11, 2000 found no record of Oma Hamou as a member.
A check with the property manager of 100 Universal City Plaza Drive, Universal City, CA on Oct 13, 2000 revealed no record of Enigma Royal Films LLC currently in the process of leasing space at that address. A check with directory assistance on Oct 9, 2000 showed no business listing for the company in the Northridge, CA area.
The original Business Information Report was created on Oct 3, 2000. Due to the above discrepancies, a reference start date of 2000 will be utilized, and credit and financial information will be withheld.
The Hillbilly moron,incapable of using a dictionary is YOU Hamou. The word "Perpetitude" does NOT EXIST. Look it up. I already double checked.
YOU are the uneducated individual. YOU are the hillbilly moron trying to use language beyond your limited capability.
and yes, soon I will show the world that YOUR ancestors aren't "colorful"...but rather rural, lowest class white from West Virginia, Kentucky and Virginia. I'll go back to 1800. No Russian, No American Indian. Just poor White TRASH. Just like you.
Well, I see Hamou's guided tour to the world of hillbilly grammar continued into the evening.
She wrote:
"You haven't proven no Grandfather of mine was never born in Russia in 1911"
I guess she was daydreaming about her future as a Hollywood mogul during the lesson on double negatives.
And she has conveniently forgotten that she did not claim a grandfather was born in Russia in 1911. She claimed it was a great great grandfather -- making her own birth four generations later in 1963 a mathematical absurdity.
I thought I'd spend a few minutes this morning trying to clear up the confusion Hamou created with her use of the term "perpetitude" and her subsequent insistence that it's a real word. Why not? It's Friday.
Here is just a sampling of what I found:
From Merriam-Webster:
“The word you've entered isn't in the dictionary. Click on a spelling suggestion below or try again using the search bar above.”
From Dictionary.com:
"No dictionary results."
From OneLook.com, a site that scans all online dictionaries for the word:
“Sorry, no dictionaries in the selected category contain the word perpetitude."
I have, however, misplaced my Oxford Dictionary of the Hillbilly Language, which has not yet been loaded onto the internet. Perhaps perpitude is in there.
Hamou says her Russian grandfather isn't in the Harvey side...
by Oma Hamou on Thu Jan 17, 2013 1:10 pm " My Russian ancestry does not go through this Grandfather's linage" (sic) We can only assume Ms Hillbilly means "lineage".
BUT she also wrote " Being an American of Russian ancestry she has always been interested in her cultural heritage. Her Russian lineage comes from her Mother's Grandfather, John Forman. There is little known about him, as he came to America in 1917 from St. Petersburg, Russia, when he was 5 years old."
OK: Her mother is Nola M. Harvey, born 1945 in West Virginia.
Nola has the customary 2 Grandfathers:
Alonzo N. Harvey born 1888 in West Virginia, but Hamou says this isnt the one, SO we turn to the other, She STATED PUBLICLY WAS "JOHN FORMAN" A RUSSIAN WHO CAME FROM ST. PETERSBURG IN 1917.
IN FACT, Nola's ONLY OTHER GRANDFATHER IS: Harold Harrah, born in 1871 in WEST VIRGINIA.
SHE has NO RELATIVES ANYWHERE born in 1912 in Russia. THIS IS A TOTAL LIE AND FABRICATION.
Nola's Parents: Harold Harvey born 1914 WEST VIRGINIA and Sarrah Harrah born 1918 WEST VIRGINIA.
Jackie McConnells parents: Royal McConnell born 1897 in KENTUCKY and Oma Ree Murphy born 1908 in KENTUCKY.
NO RUSSIANS FROM 1912 OR 1917!! total LIE!
Shall I go back further and disabuse of the lie of ANY russians? Harrahs and Harveys are all over West Virginia for years before still.
Well, Hamou, how do you wiggle out of that!
Another proven Hamou lie - great detective work, Rob.
Wait, guys. This is getting very confusing.
On one site, Hamou claims it was her mother's grandfather -- therefore her great grandfather -- who came from Russia. But on another site she claims it was a great-great grandfather.
Oh, wait. I know the answer. It was her great grandfather who was a great man. Therefore, it was her great great-grandfather.
Of course, that still leaves us with another problem.
If Nola's parents were born in 1914 and 1918 and one of Nola's grandfathers was born in Russia in 1911 or 1912 (she keeps changing the dates), that would mean that John Forman had a child at either the age of 2, 3, 6 or 7 (depending on whether it was 1911 or 1912 and whether it was Nola's grandfather through her mother or her father).
So ....... John Forman had his first child somewhere between the ages of 2 and 7.
Now how is that possible?
Oh, right. Hamou has already answered that: Russian nobles had their children very young. Very, very young. In fact, unbelievably young.
Oh, God. This is just too much fun.
The complete section from Dun & Bradstreet shows Hamou to be a serial liar and she continues to lie about this until today:
D&B Business Information Report
Report Printed: OCT 15 2003 Business Summary
ENIGMA ROYAL FILMS LLC
19501 Mayall St
Northridge, CA 91324
Rating Change
This is a single location.
Telephone: 818 349-3736
Manager: OMA HAMOU, PRINCIPAL
Year started: 2000
Employs: Undetermined
History: INCOMPLETE
SIC: 9999
Line of business:Undetermined
D-U-N-S Number: 93-040-8252
D&B Rating:ERN
Formerly --
Number of employees:ERN is Not Available.
Special Events
10/16/2000
In previous interviews with Oma Hamou, principal, it was indicated that Enigma Royal Films LLC started in 1999 and operates as a film production company with 100 employees. It was further indicated that the company operates from the residence of Oma Hamou with a 5,362 square foot three story building in the rear of the property. In addition, it was indicated that the company is in the process of leasing space at 100 Universal City Plaza Drive, Universal City, CA (Universal Studios Inc). A phone number of (818) 349-3736 was also provided. She further indicated that she is a member of the California Attorney's For Criminal Justice.
A check with the Delaware Secretary of State on Oct 10, 2000 shows that the company is registered as a limited liability company as of Sep 14, 2000. A check with the California Secretary of State on Oct 9, 2000 revealed no record of the company registered as a foreign limited liability company to conduct business in the state of California. A check with the Los Angeles County Business Licensing Department records as of Apr 15, 2000 revealed no record of the required license for the company. In addition, a check with the Los Angeles County Registrar/Recorder Office on Oct 10, 2000 revealed no record of Enigma Royal Films LLC registered as a fictitious name in the county. Also, a check with the California Attorney's For Criminal Justice on Oct 11, 2000 found no record of Oma Hamou as a member.
A check with the property manager of 100 Universal City Plaza Drive, Universal City, CA on Oct 13, 2000 revealed no record of Enigma Royal Films LLC currently in the process of leasing space at that address. A check with directory assistance on Oct 9, 2000 showed no business listing for the company in the Northridge, CA area.
The original Business Information Report was created on Oct 3, 2000. Due to the above discrepancies, a reference start date of 2000 will be utilized, and credit and financial information will be withheld.
Note that between 2000 and 2003 - three years later - D&B had not changed their report on Hamou and Enigma Films. She how claims she resolved it with their legal department. She also claims she never spoke to them in the first place and someone called D&D and gave them this information impersonating her and using her home phone.
She still claims it was me.
Lies, and more lies from Hamou.
Oh, my dears. I am even more confused than you.
John Forman does not sound like a very Russian name to me. Perhaps he anglicized it?
I know many of my relatives who fle -- er, left -- the Vaterland decided to anglicize their names.
I must admit, I could never figure out how this anglicization was supposed to work. My dear uncle Rolf Obersat changed his name to John Smith, and his darling wife Ute, who used to hold some kind of job with the railroads going into Poland, became Priscilla Smith.
I thought anglicized names were supposed to bear some resemblance to the original names. But my mother and Aunt Prissy continue to assure me I am wrong. In fact, they can get quite testy when I bring up the subject.
I wonder what John Forman's true Russian name was. And I am surprised (shocked, really) that Mr. Hamou / McConnell / Murphy / Moran hasn't included it in her suite of noms de plume. She has become Alexandra, after all. So how does the little darling resist using the surname of her Russian forebears?
Now, since you dears are all such sticklers for correct usage, don't jump down my throat. I know a nom de plume is an alias used only in regard to written works.
But Ms. H/M/M/M is a well-known fiction author.
Of checks especially.
Bob Atchison posted:
"She now claims she resolved it with their legal department."
Good grief. Has anyone ever done any business with Hamou without winding up with lawyers involved?
There is no "incomplete information" about Hamou's grandparents and great grandparents.
HERE is Hamou's grandfather's 2003 obituary: http://www.funeralplan2.com/tyree/archive?id=16256
Notice the specific mention of "Nola May Harvey McConnell", Hamou's mother by her own admission.
The obituary clearly mentions her grandfather as being Harold James Harvey, 89. Born September 26, 1914 at Summers County, WV he was the son of the late Elonzo Newton and Louise Catherine Biggs Harvey.
Notice also, He is preceded in death by his wife, Sarah Elizabeth Harvey;one son, Melvin Harvey
Thus we know for CERTAIN that Hamou's mother's Grandparents are Harold James Harvey and Sarah Elizabeth Harvey.
Look here again at Hamou's parent's wedding license:
http://www.wvculture.org/vrr/va_view.aspx?Id=12731366&Type=Marriage
Clearly, the document NAMES Nola's parents as Harold and Sarrah Harvey.
Thus, we have double blind confirmation of the fact.
Now, look at the death certificate for Melvin Harvey, who died as a young child, sadly in a house fire.
http://www.wvculture.org/vrr/va_view.aspx?Id=5331944&Type=Death
This official document states clearly the Mother's Maiden Name is "Sarrah Harrah". Born in West Virginia
Now, look at who reported the death. One Harold Harrah, Laurel Creek, Fayette County W.Va
The 1930 US Census record shows she was born in 1918. Her father, as shown in the Census AND on the death report was one and the same Harold Harrah, born 1871 in West Virginia. Guess where they were all living in 1930? Yep, Laurel Creek, Fayette County W. Va.
Sorry Oma. No Russian grandfathers anywhere in sight.
Lordy. What is it about that family and house fires?
Hamou writes:
"I still stand by my word, the information Rob Moshein has published concerning my cultural heritage is incomplete."
What does "cultural history" have to do with ancestry and DNA?
Rob has proven Hamou lied and had no Russian ancestors.
All she has to do is post a name of one that is real. She can't because there aren't any. LIAR. It can all be traced, it's easy.
Hey!
Bob and I just got a call from Mike Pyles. The Judge in the Illinois Defamation lawsuit just now ruled in Mr. Pyles' favor, on Summary Judgment Motion, against Rev Hernandez.
Hamou posted:
"I feel sorry for Mr. Hernandez's loss but he can still have that judgment set aside."
Yes. He can file a Bill of Review and then have Robbie Richman write the judge a letter.
Works every time.
Back to the ancestry, though. Isn't it odd how whenever Hamou gets backed into a corner by the obvious lies she posts, she starts posturing about being too grand to have to provide corroborating information to the likes of us.
She used the ploy with the 9/11 email she wrote to Boardrush. She used it with the Richman letters she falsely claimed Atchison wrote. And now she's using it with Great Grandpa Forman, that tricky Russian who managed to be born in Appalachia of American parents. And born before his own father -- Hamou's great-great grandfather (1911 or 1912) -- to boot.
Did I say that tricky Russian? I meant to say that walking crucible of miracles.
Hamou posted:
"I have no obligation to satisfy your purient curiousity"
It's prurient, not purient.
It's curiosity, not curiousity.
And your claim went well beyond saying you had a "drop" of Russian blood. You made a specific claim about a specific grandfather being Russian -- something that publicly-available genealogy records prove was a lie.
But maybe your mother or grandmother lied to you about it, so you thought it was true.
Maybe lies run in your family like house fires.
Maybe the Russian Great Grandpa John Ivanovich Forman, was involved with one of Hamou's ancestors and a baby was born outside of marriage.
Perhaps it involved rape. Maybe it was a double rape and a cherokee was involved.
Maybe there was a two-headed baby or a fire.
Oma McConnell claims "her Mother's grandfather" ie: Great Grandfather was "John Forman" a RUSSIAN who came to the United States in 1917 at age 5. She has also claimed this to be her Great Great Grandfather.
The FACTUAL RECORD IS WITHOUT DOUBT. Oma McConnell's mother, Nola May Harvey McConnell, does NOT have grandfather OR Great Grandfather named "John Forman" NOR a RUSSIAN who came to the United States in 1917 or anywhere near. She has NO BLOOD RELATION on her Mother's side as far back as 1870 who is a RUSSIAN, nor does she have a Maternal Grandfather or first and second great grandfather named "John Forman".
THESE are her lies.
Nola May Harvey McConnell will go to her death knowing THIS about her first born child.
That child had a son out of wedlock. The son is a violent, mentally ill drug addict, unable to care for himself and is currently in a mental hospital.
That child has several FAILED marriages.
That child has THREE felony convictions. THREE arrests for probation violation of those convictions.
That child was arrested and jailed on Felony forgery charges.
That child has hundreds of thousands of dollars of legal judgments against her.
That child has had several Bench Warrants for her arrest for refusing to comply with Court orders
That child has been found in Contempt of Court at least four times
That child has had eviction proceedings filed against her by each and every landlord from whom she has rented in the last six years.
That child has filed Bankruptcy twice, but each time has failed to obey Court orders to complete the required schedules and appear at mandatory creditor meetings.
That child hordes animals and has been cited multiple times by animal control for squalid and inhumane conditions.
That child has been caught out in a string of lies and falsehoods for over a decade
I could go on and on..
But the point is, will Nola McConnell die being PROUD of the "contribution" her eldest child made to society?
Interesting question.
Here it is, folks. Yet another whopper from Hamou today.
She posted:
'the bankruptcy court did not ORDER me to complete any schedules'
Au contraire, Hamou. You should purchase a PACER account so that you can see what the Bankruptcy Court posted about your case.
On March 5, 2012 the Court issued three orders for you to comply with filing requirements:
1. A "Notice of Requirement to File a Statement of Completion of Course in Personal Financial Management".
2. An "Order to Comply with Bankruptcy Rule 1007". followed by a list of 10 missing schedules and 2 missing statements.
3. A "Case Commencement Deficiency Notice", followed by a list of 10 missing documents. The notice ends with an order stating, "You must file the Chapter 7 Individual Debtor’s Statement of Intention within 30 days from filing of your petition."
Three orders were issued. There was compliance with none.
Once again, it astonishes me that you will lie about things that can be found in the public records.
Things such as saying the Bankruptcy Court did not order you to complete any schedules.
Things such as saying that you were on a flight from Boston to L.A. on 9/11.
Things such as saying that Bob Atchison wrote letters to the Travis County Court and that the court had the envelope with his return address on it.
Things such as saying that your great grandfather was born in Russia.
The proof of your whoppers is in PUBLIC RECORDS, nitwit.
You are either the world's most incompetent liar, or you lie so habitually that you no longer even notice.
Probably both, actually.
Hamou also posted:
"hoping to sway the opinion of the public against me. All they do is laugh at you or up chuck at your unbelievable stupidity."
I see.
So why are we not the ones having trouble finding a place to live?
Hamou posted:
"had I attended any hearing in the federal bankruptcy court during this time period I could have been arrested on a warrant fronm the state of Texas"
What?
How many times did you post earlier that "law enforcement" in California had assured you that they would never arrest you on a Texas warrant?
By the way, all those court orders were mailed to the address YOU gave the court in your bankruptcy filing.
Of course, if I were you, I'd avoid checking my mail, too.
Hamou posted:
"I don't purposely publish a lie. I was unaware of this fact [that the bankruptcy court had issued orders for her to file missing schedules]"
Right.
So now you're saying that Baruch Cohen, the high-powered lawyer who's name you emblazoned across your forum as your legal representative, never told you about the orders to comply.
Right.
You're conveniently forgetting that Cohen had discussions with Barry Wegman, Atchison's attorney, asking him for more time, and telling Wegman that he was having difficulty getting you to provide him with the information needed for the delinquent schedules.
Of course, all this happened before Cohen dumped you for non-payment and refusal to cooperate, as he had become worried that your refusals to comply were going to compromise his own reputation with the court.
No lawyer will continue to represent a client who refuses to comply with court orders.
Remember Shane Boasberg, another in the long line of lawyers who dumped you?
Hamou wrote: "had I attended any hearing in the federal bankruptcy court during this time period I could have been arrested on a warrant fronm the state of Texas"
Another LIE, baldfaced as usual.
Hamou NEVER ONCE OBJECTED to the Bankruptcy Court about the Bench Warrant. She NEVER BROUGHT IT UP! Until AFTER her bankruptcy was DISMISSED by Judge Robles.
Hamou DID IN FACT APPEAR AT A HEARING! The one where Judge Robles was asked to ISSUE A BENCH WARRANT FOR OMA'S ARREST FOR FAILING TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT'S ORDERS.
Was she arrested? Nope. But the Judge did rake her over the COALS for failing repeatedly to comply with his orders. We have ordered the transcript.
From Oma Hamou's "best friend" "Jim Sproul", November 1, 2003 to Bob Atchison:
As to the priest in Russia, Father Markell, he is a thief, liar and a con artist and friend of Bob Atchison. The Russian authorities know of what Father Markell has done to not only Oma but to many Russians, his own people as well as to other foreigners over the years. It was Father Markell who baptized Oma inside of the Fedorovsky Cathedral the cathedral that she helped restored and it was Father Markell who said on video tape that the Metropolitan of St. Petersburg gave her the Christian name Alexandra.
He morally raped my friend Oma and did it all in the name of the Church. She revered him as her spiritual teacher and all the while he was sabotaging her life's purpose and most precious project, painfully obviously in order to not get caught as he took amounts of money that she donated to the church and kept it for his personal gain.
Hamou, you know very well that YOU were the one who posted all this stuff about Markell signing things, and there is more than this. You claimed Markell raped you and he signed documents for the phoney and fraudulent loans for millions you claimed you had. It was all lies and you know it.
From my own experience I know you are incapable of telling the truth and your very nature is intrinsically evil and destructive. You will never repent for what you have done and I think you are absolutely beyond redemption.
from:
From: ENIGMAFILMS@aol.com
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 14:23:11 EDT
To: sautov@tzar.ru
Cc: nagorsky@tzar.ru, vakulenko@peterlink.ru, vetr@mail.spbnit.ru
Subject: (no subject)
....
Enigma has the financial burden of the project and it has not been easy when I have had no cooperation. This is why we must all combined our efforts in order to achieve something truly extraordinary. I did not come to your country and say that I was an heiress. I came alone. Armed with only Faith in what I was doing and wanting to accomplish. Enigma's money comes from a loan to finance its film project. If we are going to film there, let's do it right the first time, and everyone wins in the end. I want the palace to be restored as I do the Gorodk. I would like to eventually see the hotel that the Church proposes, and the school for both the men and women that serve the church as well as the Patriarch's residence. I would like to see the partnership of this effort to flourish.
The Fedorovsky Cathedral is my church and sacred.
But the women within have hurt our partnership and Father Markell, by telling strangers that I, Oma, did no restoration, just donated a computer and $3,000.00!
This discredits Father Markell because he signed for completed works that Enigma did perform as well as the fact that we have the signed work orders and receipts as well as Enigma's bank transactions in conjunction with the Cathedral.
September 18, 2001
Dr. Ivan Petrovich Sautov
Within the Fedorovsky Cathedral are certain women, who do not like me, =
and I am certain, prays that I do not return to Russia. How does this
affect the rest of you? I will tell you. The financial institutions that are providing Enigma the loans for its film project that includes the Russian restoration projects, have been randomly calling the Cathedral to verify that certain works, which Father Markell signed for, have been performed. These documents reflect not only Father Markell's signature but also serve as verification of signed receipts as well bank statements of works performed and completed.
Also 'strangers", questioning my motives and ability have called the Cathedral who provided them with additional telephone numbers. These calls are from people who for one reason or another such as jealously do not like me. Lydia and others within the Cathedral and outside have told such horrible lies such as that I, Oma Hamou, did not do any restoration on the Fedorovsky Cathedral or at the Alexander Palace. And at the most I contributed was a computer and $3,000.00. I want to scream at these individuals who dishonor me, in this manner.
BTW, it is a great compliment that Hamou thinks I am you Blake.
I wish I could write as well as you and had your keen insight and legal knowledge.
You are a brave man and truly a hero.
Post a Comment