When one uses a search engine online using my name, and my trade name, The Austin Wine Guy, one finds a deluge of defamatory and simply out right lies spread across the Internet results now going back several years all from her hand.
I would NOT even have written here, had this person not continually written her own false and defamatory statements herself and aided and abetted other personae writing "on her behalf" for the last six years. If she doesn't want me to say anything about her, she ought not have been continually blogging and writing about me much less aiding and encouraging others to do so as well.
The woman behind all of this uses alias names: Oma Hamou, Oma McConnell, Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Hamou, Alexandra Moran, Oma Demian, Alexandra Murphy, are the usual ones, but there are others. She used the name "Oma Kennedy" to obtain money from a woman who was approached to adopt her child (she only took her child back, on literally the last possible day, after the adoptive mother refused to continue to pay her any more money.) She uses a business name of "Enigma Royal Films, LLC" she also calls just "Enigma Films" and "Reseda Glass" and "Worldwide Construction Enterprises, Inc." I learned about her genuine background, and she wants me silenced from speaking about it.
This woman admits that her actions are all motivated by her bitterness and hatred towards me, and this is the reason for her actions.
This woman, Oma Hamou, Oma McConnell, Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Hamou, Oma Demian, Alexandra Murphy and her other aliases have a twenty plus year track record of FELONY CONVICTIONS, multiple arrests, failure to abide by the requirements of her probation for her felony convictions which lead to more arrests, many many civil judgments against her for hundreds of thousands of dollars, a history of writing bad checks, and she was arrested late in 2008 in San Bernardino California on a Felony Charge of Forgery of a Financial Instrument (she seems to have forged a large check) After 14 months of dragging the process out, she paid the Victim full restitution and the District Attorney dropped the Felony charge. She has a history of evictions and bad checks.
A complete dossier has been posted, with the details on her activities, notably passing bad checks, stiffing landlords for rent owed and trashing the houses she rents by reason of keeping literally dozens of cats and dogs and not cleaning up after them. Not to mention numerous unpaid judgments against her.
That blog is here.
Oma Hamou using the ALIAS NAME OF Alexandra Louise McConnell was ARRESTED BY THE BURBANK POLICE DEPARTMENT ON FRIDAY MARCH 8, 2013 ON A FELONY CRIMINAL WARRANT FOR FAILURE TO APPEAR IN COURT ON ANIMAL ABUSE CHARGES THAT WERE FILED AGAINST HER ON JANUARY 29, 2013 IN PALMDALE.
SHE WAS HELD FROM 1130 AM UNTIL 4:15pm and released on bail.
Case number ATP3AV007224-01
One can EASILY find this booking sheet by going to http://app4.lasd.org/iic/ and type in "Alexandra McConnell" and see this exact same document from the Sheriff's department itself. "Alexandra" of course claims this is a forgery. She must believe the LASD are "forging" documents. SHE WAS CONVICTED ON THIS ANIMAL ABUSE CHARGE (PENAL CODE 597(B) JULY 30, 2013
Less than six months later "Alexandra McConnell" was arrested AGAIN on December 16, 2013 and 96 sick, filthy and neglected animals found living in the most deplorable of conditions were confiscated from her Lancaster California residence by the Lancaster Animal Control Shelter. Oma Hamou aka Alexandra McConnell, Booking No.: 3805070 was held in custody for 36 hours before being released on a $50,000 bond. Charges are pending and a hearing on this Case, number 3AV0072401 is scheduled on the matter for January 7, 2014 in the Antelope Valley Courthouse..
This woman also has a default Judgment against her in Los Angeles County, in the amount of $55,000 which is admitted under oath was owing in her Bankruptcy Petition:
Case Number: MC020860 HAMID REFAI VS ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL, JIM SPROUL, ET AL
Filing Date: 09/23/2009
According to the case, Mr. Refai, a married man, was "involved" with Alexandra McConnell, she kept telling him about serious "medical problems" and asking for "loans" for medical bills in the total amount of $51,000. This was confirmed by the fact that a woman who used to live in her house wrote on the internet THREE MONTHS before the suit was filed: "I lived with this lady, she is no good. SHE LIES. SHE HAS LIKE 50 CATS LIVING WITH HER AND HER HOUSE SMELLS LIKE SHIT AND CAT SPRAY AND PISS. She is dirty, filthy and uses old men for money I SEEN IT MYSELF. By the way Hamid's wife knows it was LIPOSUCTION you drained their bank account for, not cancer in your asshole. He had her sign a promissory note, co signed by long time co-conspirator Jim Sproul. She of course never PAID back the money. She, of course, never showed up in Court.
Here is the Final Judgment against Alexandra McConnell aka Oma Hamou and her "longtime friend" Jim Sproul:
Mr. Refai is pressing the collection of this Judgment and ordered a Debtor's Exam of Hamou aka Alexandra McConnell. On February 5, 2013, Hamou aka McConnell failed to appear at a Court Ordered Debtor Exam and The Hon. Judge Yep of the Los Angeles County Superior Court issued a Bench Warrant for her ARREST and ordered a $10,000 bond must be posted by Hamou aka McConnell to compel her appearance.
OMA HAMOU AKA ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL SCAMS:
The following have agreed to speak with law enforcement or potential landlords about their experiences and the Felony Forgery charge against this woman, in the hopes that others will not fall prey to her in the future.
2008. SHARLANE CHIPI. Represented by Attorney LAURENCE H. LISHNER filed Unlawful Detainer (EVICTION) against her tenant Oma McConnell Case Number: 08U03169
CHIPI, CHARLANE (sic)VS. MCCONNELL, OMA
Sharlane Cecilia Chipi. She lives in Torrance, and her phone number is available upon request.
In 2008 Ms. Chipi was seeking a short sale of her home. A realtor named Kevin Davies (phone available upon request) introduced Oma McConnell to Ms. Chipi, claiming she had loan approval to purchase the house but that McConnell wanted to move in as a renter prior to closing the sale. (This was exactly the scenario she used to gain occupancy at Mr. O'Connor's house in Littlerock.) Ms. Chipi agreed.
The first rental check was written on a closed account. No further rental payments were made. McConnell moved in with her son and another man. The house was thoroughly trashed. Numerous animals were kept in one room which was badly damaged. Carpeting was ripped out. Appliances were removed. The kitchen caught fire.
Ms. Chipi sought help from the Sheriff's department which told her that they could do nothing without an eviction order. Ms. Chipi filed a U.D. (Case No. 08U03169 - Michael Antonovich Antelope Valley Courthouse), which she later dropped due to lack of resources. She said that Kevin Davies also filed an action against McConnell and that she failed to show for the hearing.
Ms. Chipi says she has some files on the incident, as does Mr. Davies, and that she also has undeveloped film of the damage done to the house.
Robert Atchison
Won a Civil Judgment against Oma Hamou for her failure to pay him consulting fees as she promised him she would do.
Mr. Atchison is proceeding with Post Judgment Document Production demands from Oma Hamou. A District Court Judge has signed an order requiring her to schedule and appear at a deposition in Austin Texas no later than September 3 to disclose her assets, finances, and employment information, and she is further ORDERED to comply by providing the requested financial, employment and asset documentation to Mr. Atchison no later than August 20. She did nothing. Her failure to do these things resulted in an order of Contempt of Court.
August 2011: Hamou/McConnell tried to derail Mr. Atchison's debt collection with a last moment filing of a "Bill of Review". Hamou's Bill of Review was dismissed on July 26, 2011 by the Hon Judge Cooper of the District Court. Hamou now has no choice but to comply with the Court order.
OCTOBER 18:
The Court slapped Oma Hamou with an Order of Contempt of Court and imposed $1,000 sanctions against her for failing to comply with the Ordered Document Production and Deposition.
January 2012: District Court Lora Livingston Slapped an ORDER TO APPEAR AND SHOW CAUSE on Oma Hamou requiring her to appear in Person to explain her continuing violation of Court Orders. Her failure to appear will most likely result in a Bench Warrant for her Arrest:
Hamou failed to appear as ordered by the Court. As a result, a BENCH WARRANT for her arrest was issued on March 26, 2012 by the same Judge Livingston in the Travis County District Court
Hamou attempted in June 2012 to ask the Court to vacate the Bench Warrant, but it seems her "Paralegal" one Robert Richman (a Tai Chi master and Torah Scholar, as well as "Paralegal") seems to have chickened out on continuing.
In 2012 "Oma McConnell" filed for Bankruptcy in order to forestall debtor's exams and collection efforts. She failed to file any required schedules or information, despite Court orders to do so. Her Bankruptcy was dismissed for that failure. However, On August 20, 2012 Judge Robles of the US Federal Bankruptcy Court ordered her Bankruptcy proceedings to be re-instated and ordered her to comply with Document Production requests and Deposition by attorneys for Bob Atchison, which are now scheduled for late September. Hamou/McConnell FAILED TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT ORDERED DOCUMENT PRODUCTION REQUIRED NO LATER THAN SEPTEMBER 14, 2012. She further FAILED TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT ORDER THAT SHE APPEAR FOR A DEPOSITION ON SEPTEMBER 20, 2012. She can now be held in Contempt of Court.
October 31, 2012, the Bankruptcy Court dismissed Oma McConnell's bankruptcy due to her utter failure to file even one single required schedule or document. Judge Ernesto Robles said her creditors "are free to pursue their State claims against her".
March 2013: Mr. Atchison has had his Judgment made final in California and localized to California and is proceeding to collect against her. A Debtors Exam (ORAP) has now been issued and ordered by the Los Angeles Superior Court for Hamou/McConnell to appear in Court.
Eric Cowan
Landlord in 2010. Bad checks and trashed house. Rented from him as "Alexandra McConnell" but presented an expired California Driver's License in the name of Oma Hamou.
661-947-2079
Thomas Ward
Attorney for Hamid Refai (victim of a scam who loaned Alexandra McConnell $50,000, for "cancer treatments" actually used by Alexandra McConnellto pay the Victim Restitution in the Felony Forgery case in Victorville, never repaid). Los Angeles Superior Court Case Number: MC020860 HAMID REFAI VS ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL, ET AL
Mr. Ward's telephone number for details: 661-948-5021
Bryan Stodghill
Prosecutor in Victorville,San Bernardino County Felony Forgery Case where Alexandra McConnell wrote a check in 2009 on a closed account to the landlord, and in his words "She basically destroyed the house." He states that he would have taken her to trial on the charge had she not paid full Victim Restitution to the Landlord for the bad check and damages to the house.
760-243-8600
Patrick J. O'Connor
Homeowner in Littlerock California who was selling his house using the services of Shari Porter agent with Big Valley Realty in Palmdale California. Shari Porter brought "Alexandra Moran" using an expired drivers license in the name of Oma Hamou to Mr. O'Connor as a "Qualified Buyer" of his home. Shari Porter insisted Oma Hamou be allowed to rent part of the home as a room mate of Mr. O'Connor until the sale closed. Porter kept informing Mr. O'Connor that Hamou was pre-qualified by lenders, yet never actually provided the required documentation proving this to O'Connor. Shari Porter told O'Connor that Hamou had deposited funds into escrow at Titan Escrow in Palmdale, but again refused to give O'Connor any actual escrow documents. Hamou delayed closing for a full five months, then refused to close when O'Connor demanded. She further refused to leave the property and squatted in the residence with four men, another woman and four or five children and literally ten or twelve dogs and forty to fifty cats. She has moved an old trailer and cargo boxes onto the property as well. She has squatted on Mr. O'Connor's property for over 18 months without paying rent. This sadly forced Mr. O'Connor to lose his property to Foreclosure and Declare Bankruptcy, as direct results of this woman's scams and lies.
pjoinak@yahoo.com (I also have Mr. O'Connor's cell phone number should anyone wish to speak with him directly)
She uses 145 South Glenoaks Burbank, CA as her "legal address". However this address is actually FEDEX Burbank and is nothing more than a mail drop.
OMA HAMOU/AKA OMA MCCONNELL, ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL, ALEXANDRA MORAN EVICTION HISTORY:
Filing Date: 09/22/2008. CHIPI CHARLANE. Represented by Attorney LAURENCE H. LISHNER filed Unlawful Detainer (EVICTION) against her tenant Oma McConnell Case Number: 08U03169
CHIPI, CHARLANE VS. MCCONNELL, OMA
2009 Alexandra McConnell wrote a check in 2009 on a closed account to the landlord Huiku Batchelor. Felony Fraud charges pressed and Hamou aka McConnell evicted after being incarcerated in jail. In the proscuter's words: in his words "She basically destroyed the house."
2010: "Alexandra McConnell" rented from Eric Cowan, but presented an expired California Driver's License in the name of Oma Hamou. Hamou/McConnell gave Cowan bad checks for rent and Cowan filed unlawful detainer/eviction and got her out of his house. Cowan, Eric vs. Hamou, Oma (Michael Antonovich Antelope Valley Courthouse, Case No. 10U01290). Erik Cowan will confirm 661-947-2079
2011 "Alexandra Moran" rented a room from Patrick J. O'Connor, but presented an expired California Drivers License in the name of Oma Hamou. She then claimed to want to purchase the property. She delayed the purchase for FIVE MONTHS with numerous stories, and is now squatting on the property without permission nor paying rent . She lives there with her son, Nicholas Royal Moran, who has severe psychiatric disorders (his is currently under Conservatorship pursuant to the California Lanterman Petris Short Act) and has a history of violence, both domestic and with police. Mr. O'Connor himself witnessed Nicholas Moran beat his mother in front of him in the residence. She also lives with one Steve Fred Lee, who has over 15 criminal convictions for eluding police, indecent exposure and habitual driving with a revoked drivers license. Another squatter on the property is one Michael McBride who lives with four or five of his children also on the property. Hamou also has literally many dozens of cats and more than 10 dogs on the property. Hamou attempted to keep Mr. O'Connor from evicting her by filing a Restraining Order against Mr. O'Connor alleging he made threats of violence against her and her son. However, she did NOT file this order until a full TWO WEEKS after Mr. O'Connor left the residence and moved to Alaska! Hearing on the requested Restraining order was held Friday July 15. Hamou first requested a continuance! The Judge refused to delay the hearing. After the Judge examined her criminal record, arrest record and history of evictions and Judgments, the Judge in so many words called Hamou "a Criminal and Con Artist" recognized her string of VICTIMS and refused to grant the restraining order, and further told Hamou that while he could not order her out at the moment, she did have to leave O'Connor's property and pay him the rent owed. Hamou told O'Connor by email she will be out by September 1. Mr. O'Connor's attorney has begun Eviction Proceedings against Hamou McConnell and her other squatters. While Hamou wrote Mr. O'Connor that she would be "out of the house by September 1" she has hired a lawyer to delay the eviction proceedings. Reports indicate that the house is trashed, with old furniture in the yard, many old rusted trucks, tires, boxes and piles of trash are strewn across the property.
A Health Department Complaint about the property was filed on February 16, 2012 by the neighbors to this property complaining of "Accumulation of refuse and cast off materials" and "Accumulation of Animal Excrement" which Hamou has allowed on the property.
A Health Department Complaint about the property she currently squats in without paying rent was filed on February 16, 2012 by the neighbors to this property complaining of "Accumulation of refuse and cast off materials" and "Accumulation of Animal Excrement" which Hamou has allowed on the property.
This file also documents her use of various alias names. She was "Oma Moran" in the report filed July 12, 2011
A cable company employee called in a complaint of more than 20 dogs and 20 cats, many of them clearly ill, housed in filthy conditions on December 19. 2011
On February 29, 2012, when Animal Control went to inspect the property, she was suddenly "Alexandra Oma Louise Hamou McConnell" in a report that found filthy foul living conditions and found FORTY ONE DOGS and well over THIRTY CATS on the premises:
The City went BACK, but she still had not cleaned up the place. On March 7, 2012, the County of Los Angeles Department of Health Services issued her a CITATION FOR HEALTH CODE VIOLATIONS No. 300055 for accumulation of trash, debris and animal droppings on the property.
Some FIVE FULL MONTHS were allowed to her to comply with these orders. Animal Control went BACK on August 1, 2012 and found she still had TEN dogs and 20 cats, 3 of which were still sick:
Numerous Animal Cruelty charges were filed against her January 29, 2012 in Palmdale.
Oma Hamou using the ALIAS NAME OF Alexandra Louise McConnell was ARRESTED BY THE BURBANK POLICE DEPARTMENT ON FRIDAY MARCH 8, 2013 ON A FELONY WARRANT BASED ON THE CRIMINAL CHARGES THAT WERE FILED AGAINST HER ON JANUARY 29, 2013 IN PALMDALE. SHE WAS CONVICTED OF ANIMAL ABUSE (CAL. PENAL CODE SECTION 507(B) ON JULY 30, 2013
These photos of the property confirm these reports:
On March 7, 2012, the County of Los Angeles Department of Health Services issued her a CITATION FOR HEALTH CODE VIOLATIONS No. 300055 for accumulation of trash, debris and animal droppings on the property.
Mr. O'Connor filed an Unlawful Detainer Action in Los Angeles Superior Court, Case 11U2065 to evict Hamou.
She uses badly photoshopped images of herself to attempt to make people believe her lies. Here are three images she has used at various times over the last fifteen years, the small image is her current twitter photo, despite her now being fifty years old! You can see for yourself the face is the same exact image, used first in the late 1990s, then again in 2003, and today!
She also has a history of
failing to pay her attorneys. The following law firms have judgments
against her and/or are owed money by this woman:Freeman Freeman & Smiley in Los Angeles $10,000
Westar Legal Services in Los Angeles, $10,000
Foster Malish LLC in Austin Texas $20,000
Suzanne Curtis in Los Angeles $1,000
2011 "Alexandra Moran" rented a room from Patrick J. O'Connor, but presented an expired California Drivers License in the name of Oma Hamou. She then claimed to want to purchase the property. She delayed the purchase for FIVE MONTHS with numerous stories, and is now squatting on the property without permission nor paying rent Mr. O'Connor has retained an attorney and legal action is pending for yet ANOTHER EVICTION. Patrick J. O'Connor will confirm. pjoinak@yahoo.com
NEW INFORMATION IN THIS MATTER JUNE 25, 2011:
Published on the web by Oma Hamou herself:
From: sarskaia@aol.com
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:18:25 -0400 (EDT)
To:
Subject: Re: The Motorcycle
Mr. O'Connor,
I will not be arrested for the motorcycle as you left it here because I was going to buy it. If you no longer want to sell it to me, I have no problems giving it to Ralph. He must contact me and arrange a time and the day with me so that we can coordinate our schedules. He or no other friend of yours can just show up and expect to gain access.
She admits here that she doesn't OWN the motorcycle and admits Mr. O'Connor wants his bike BACK.
So what does "Alexandra McConnell" aka Oma Hamou aka Alexandra Moran do??
She SELLS THE MOTORCYCLE to one "Craig" for $4,500!!
"Craig" gets suspicious because "Alexandra" can't produce the title (which of course Mr. O'Connor still had) and would only give him a handwritten bill of sale (a copy of which I have in my possession now). The Los Angeles County Sheriffs were involved YET AGAIN with her and her various names to safely return the motorcycle to Mr. O'Connor!
Selling property that she admits isn't HERS to sell legally! Isn't that "grand theft"??
Also, taking money for property you do not own nor have title to by claiming it is yours to sell is "THEFT BY DECEPTION" a felony crime for which she has been convicted three times in the past.
Someone else has recently posted a precis of the criminal and debt history of this woman. You can go here to read the specific details for yourself:
http://www.omahamoureality.blogspot.com
I have put up a precis of the specific information for her victims and law enforcement here: http://OmaHamouVictims.blogspot.com
You are encouraged to share information you may have about her and her activities with me.
OMA HAMOU AKA ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL BAD CHECK HISTORY:
07/22/2010 `NSF` CHECK WRITTEN BY OMA HAMOU WAS RECEIVED BY THE LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT FOR FILING FEES AND MOTION FEE , (HAMOU, OMA) AKA(MCCONNELL, ALEXANDRA) AKA (DEMIAN, OME) AKA (ASHKENAZY, OMA) AKA (HAMOU, ALEXANDRA) AKA(CHEDID, OMA) AKA (JORDAN, REBECCA) AKA (TAYLOR, JORDAN) AKA (ABRAMOV, OMA) NOTIFIED BY MAIL PER SECTION C.C.P. 411.20. PAYMENT DUE BY 08/16/10 , IN THE SUM OF $ 310.00 . Proof is here in the case record: Cowan, Eric vs. Hamou, Oma (Michael Antonovich Antelope Valley Courthouse, Case No. 10U01290)
EARLY 2010 ERIK COWAN RECEIVED SEVERAL CHECKS FROM ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL/OMA HAMOU FOR RENT DUE ON PROPERTY HE OWNED. CHECKS WHERE BOTH NSF AND ON A CLOSED FLORIDA ACCOUNT BELONGING TO RESEDA SCREEN & GLASS. OMA HAMOU IS EVICTED FROM THE PROPERTY AS A RESULT. Cowan, Eric vs. Hamou, Oma (Michael Antonovich Antelope Valley Courthouse, Case No. 10U01290). Erik Cowan will confirm 661-947-2079
OCTOBER 2008 MRS. HUIKU BATCHELOR IS WRITTEN A CHECK FOR RENT BY ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL ON A CLOSED ACCOUNT IN THE NAME OF OMA HAMOU. THIS CHECK IS PROSECUTED AS FELONY FORGERY BY THE SAN BERNARDINO DISTRICT ATTORNEY. Case No. FVI802540 . District Attorney Bryan Stodghill will confirm. 760-243-8600
2004 OMA HAMOU ISSUES CHECKS ON A CLOSED ACCOUNT TO THE FOLLOWING PERSONS IN IRVINE CALIFORNIA:
ONE TO MONIQUE HAHN,
ONE TO WILD WEST MEDIA (17522 Von Karman Ave. Irvine, CA. 92614) ,
ONE TO RICH SCHAEFER.
-Police investigation into these bad checks was opened by the Irvine Police Department.
June 25, 1991 – Oma Demian (NOW OMA HAMOU) is arrested in the State of Utah for NSF Check November 7,1991 "Oma McConnell" (aka Oma Demian) was convicted in the State of Utah, Park City District Court, Utah Administrative Office of the Courts case number 2218-911613381, of the 2nd degree Felony crime of "Theft By Deception" in violation of Utah Criminal Statue 76-6-405, and a disposition of "Guilty" has been entered in that Court for this crime.
NSF CHECKS IN THIS CASE WERE WRITTEN TO
JUPITER PROPERTY MANAGEMENT/DIANE APT $5,000
FIRST SECURITY BANK $4,500
NSF Checks written by Oma Demian (now Hamou) in Wyoming to:
KMart, 12/14/90 $437.95
United Airlines 12/17/90 $3,456.00
JANUARY 24, 1992 OMA DEMIAN (NOW OMA HAMOU) CONVICTED IN YELLOWSTONE COUNTY MONTANA FOR FELONY OF ISSUING A BAD CHECK COMMON SCHEME, SENTENCED TO TEN YEARS PROBATION.
April 1, 1992: Oma Demian NOW OMA HAMOU AKA ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL convicted of the Felony offense of Issuing a bad check over $150 was sentenced to 120 months in Prison, sentence suspended. Case 91-103, in Billings,Yellowstone County Montana, for the fraudulent checks issued in 1991.
She is truly psychotic in her daily compulsion because I stumbled onto these actual facts of her past, and present, which do not coincide with the personae she wants to project to others.
This woman, Oma Hamou, Oma McConnell, Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Hamou, Oma Demian, Alexandra Murphy et al, has for YEARS now, threatened me with civil and criminal actions. For years now, NOTHING has happened except more ongoing threats online.
I am called a "criminal stalker". First, being called a criminal is Libel per se in Texas, since I have never been convicted of ANYTHING worse than one speeding ticket. As for a stalker, well, I have no clue where this woman is, where she lives, and frankly I don't WANT to know, nor can I care less. In the words of one of her attorney's, Dave. S. "the faster that woman is in my rearview mirror the happier I'll be" (yeah I have the email he said that to me in.). I WISH NO CONTACT WITH OR FROM THIS PERSON.
I do NOT wish this person ill, or harm. Frankly, I do not care about her. The less I hear about her, the better. That said, no one should ever be subjected to harm or danger. I DO NOT WISH THIS PERSON HARM, nor have I advocated, wished, nor advised anyone to harm her. Such allegations are baseless, wrong and defamatory. I just want he to leave me and my partner ALONE and stop the thousands of pages of defamatory lies she puts up and allows "friends" to post on her website in order to cause me harm.
OMA HAMOU BUSINESS ENTITY: "ENIGMA ROYAL FILMS, LLC."
Hamou has reactivated a dormant LLC, Enigma Royal Films. BEWARE however, that the "agent" for service of process is LONG out of date. Shari Leinwand with Gibson, Dunn NO LONGER SERVES AS AGENT. Oma Hamou aka Alexandra McConnell aka Oma McConnell is the TRUE agent for service of process. As an active LLC, there are large debts this LLC owes:
10/24/2002 Writ of Execution Issued (LOS ANGELES COUNTY, ENIGMA ROYAL FILMS,LLC, $82,012.56 ) by American Express. Case Number: PC027665 AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SER. CO. VS. ENIGMA ROYAL
02/07/2006 JUDGMENT ENTERED AS A FINAL DISPOSITION ON 02/07/06 . FOR (CURTIS, SUZANNE M) ATTORNEY AT LAW . AGAINST (HAMOU, OMA) , (ENIGMA ROYAL FILMS, LLC) Case Number: 05V09066 CURTIS, SUZANNE M VS. HAMOU, OMA
WORLD WIDE CONSTRUCTION ENTERPRISES, INC. was formed on 2009-10-30 in California by OMA HAMOU located at 22815 VENTURA BLVD STE 891, WOODLAND HILLS CA 91364 .
Universal ID CA-C3114859
Name WORLD WIDE CONSTRUCTION ENTERPRISES, INC.
Registration Number C3114859
Type CORP
Status CANCELED
Address 22815 VENTURA BLVD STE 891, WOODLAND HILLS CA 91364
Formation Date 2009-10-30
REGISTERED AGENT Name OMA HAMOU
Address 22815 VENTURA BLVD #891, WOODLAND HILLS CA 91364
OMA HAMOU AKA ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL BANKRUPTCY DISCREPENCIES AND TAX RECORD DISCREPENCIES:
Oma Hamou Alexandra McConnell filed for Bankruptcy twice with the Federal Court simply to derail legitimate enforcement of the many judgments against her . Here is her Bankruptcy Petition, this is the entire PDF file of 2mb, which is public record from the Court. She also filed tax returns with her lender trying to get a loan to purchase the O'Connor house. Comparing the two shows glaring discrepancies and untruths.
—Omission of Assets on Bankruptcy Petition and Schedules is considered A False Statement Under Penalty of Perjury, 18 U.S.C. § 152(3):
Oma Hamou owns two business entities, Enigma Films, Inc., and The Sarskaia Foundation plus Enigma Royal Films, LLC. Further, Oma Hamou owns and operates a website at www.OmaHamou.com, where she and alleged friends post information about her. Interestingly, Ms Hamou lists her own company, Enigma Films as her employer. The clear inference is that Enigma Films earns money with which to pay her as an employee. Yet, there is no declaration or disclosure of her ownership of these companies, nor disclosure of the value of these assets she owns.
HOWEVER: Her 2010 Tax Return states that she PURCHASED "Reseda Glass" in April 2010, three full months before the Bankruptcy filing.
Notice here in her Loan Application she lists $145,000 CASH as an asset, yet, she FAILS to identify exactly WHERE that cash is.
The Refai Judgment was just the previous year, yet she FAILED to disclose that to the lender. She lists small old debts, some as long ago as ten years, BUT FAILS TO DISCLOSE A SINGLE DEBT SHE LISTS ON THE BANKRUPTCY PETITION, JUST SIX MONTHS EARLIER. Interestingly, she doesn't list a SINGLE one of the debts on her Loan Application on her Bankruptcy Petition either!see below
Hamou received in excess of $50,000 in cash from Mr. Refai in May 2009, (see above) for which she signed a promissory note. Hamou made no disclosure of the whereabouts of this large sum of cash, nor did she disclose just where this substantial asset went. She FAILED to mention it to her lender as well...
Her 2010 IRS returns show "income" of $38,000 or $2,459 per month. She claims a "sole proprietorship" called "Reseda Glass" that "installs glass in high rise buildings" but has NO Federal Employer ID number, nor does she list any WAGES paid to any "employees". Is this almost 50 year old woman hanging off the side of a building installing glass ALL BY herself?
Her 2009 IRS Return, filed the same day (April 2011) swears that she was self employed earning $2,130 per month.
HOWEVER, her Bankruptcy Petition shows she claimed to have been employed for TEN YEARS by "Enigma Films and Glass Tech" earning $3,000 per month.
HOWEVER in, her LOAN APPLICATION Section IV "Employment Information" she wrote that "Reseda Glass" at the same address as her "residence", which is just actually a mail drop at a Fedex Office store, was her employer for TWO YEARS, and she earned $2459 per month.
—Omission of Assets on Bankruptcy Petition and Schedules is considered A False Statement Under Penalty of Perjury, 18 U.S.C. § 152(3).
Hamou McConnell Moran claims of violence, rape and cancer...
In 2002, she wrote to a Russian Orthodox Priest
Your Eminence: I am writing to you to ask you to remember me in your prayers- 2 weeks ago I underwent surgery to remove cancer from my colon and I have 100 stitches inside of me. The physicians told me yesterday that my white blood count is high and that I have 2 choices chemotherapy or another surgery as they fear that it is spread in my uterus. I am scared. I am a single mother and I work hard and now my life...my health is not good. I have been in the hospital and now I may have another surgery this week. Some things are worth more than money-
June 2007: Her ex husband confirms Oma Hamou was still claiming cancer:
I herd this from my daughter ...Anyway...according to (my daughter) that is the case...she has cancer and has fulfilled her name of Oma which means cancer in Latin.
May 11, 2009 "Alexandra McConnell" signs a promissory note borrowing $50,000 from Hamid Refai, Mr. Refai confirms, through his attorney Thomas Ward that "Alexandra McConnell" borrowed this money to pay for "cancer treatments"
This is further confirmed by an email from a former roommate who wrote on July 8, 2009: By the way Hamid's wife knows it was LIPOSUCTION you drained their bank account for, not cancer in your asshole.
August 23, 2010 on her website: yes she is still undergoing treatment for her cancer. I can definitely attest to the fact that she has indeed suffered from cancer. Those treatments are so hard on her that I have had to help her back to the car, then into her house and even into bed because they leave her so sick and weak that she cannot do anything.
Ask yourself if the following make any, rational or reasonable common sense:
This woman claims to be an actress and model, but for a decade steadfastly REFUSES to provide one single shred of evidence to support the allegation, not even a credit, reference or magazine issue. She says only "I was and I don't have to prove it. YOU have to prove I wasn't". Does that make sense?
This woman claims that her three felony convictions were not Her fault, but rather someone else's fault. Does THAT make sense?
This woman claims that her recent Felony Forgery Charges in San Bernardino are "just a big mistake" and "law enforcement and the DA" are on "her side" and "believe her", yet they STILL pressed charges and scheduling dozens of hearings over FOURTEEN MONTHS. Does THAT make sense??
This woman has claimed for six years non stop that I am being investigated by law enforcement and the FBI. Yet, NOTHING ever happened, I have never been contacted by law enforcement for any reason in those six years other than one speeding ticket. Does it make any sense to you that law enforcement is doing ANYTHING for six years now?
Buddha said Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense.
Look at all the blathering posts she has put up on the internet, and ask yourself, do these things agree with YOUR reason and your own common sense? The answer is obvious.
As you can see, this woman and/or her cronies now LIE, falsify documents and use years old private letters to attempt to defame and disparage me, and Bob Atchison
Many people whom have come into contact with her call her a con artist and scam artist. She hangs out with convicted felons, even inviting these career criminals to live in her house with her.
You can verify all the arrests, judgments, evictions, etc for yourself with simple online searches.
You are free to email me with your questions, Rob@AustinWineGuy.com, and if you yourself have been a VICTIM of this woman Oma Hamou, Oma McConnell, Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Hamou, Oma Demian, Alexandra Murphy and her NEWEST Alexandra Moran, I encourage you to contact me.
202 comments:
1 – 200 of 202 Newer› Newest»New blog, carry on with comments here.
That email that Hamou sent to Boardrush on the evening of 9/11 is remarkable for two reasons:
First, it showed she was too uninformed to know that all of the departing flights from Boston that day were grounded after the attacks and that the ones already in the air were ordered to the ground before they reached their destinations. In short, no flight on 9/11 made it from Boston to Los Angeles.
Second, this was not an email sent to a friend or family member. It was sent to a publicity and internet marketing firm. So she was obviously hoping to spin her 9/11 tale into some buzz for herself.
Given the overwrought and fawning tone of that fake feature article on her by the non-existent Nitzana Kedem, it’s not hard to imagine how the press release about which she fantasized would have sounded:
On a day of national tragedy that left the American people in shock, everyone has their own story to tell of how the horrific attacks affected them. One of the most compelling stories is that of Oma Hamou, the model and actress turned film producer and charity founder, who narrowly escaped death that day.
Ms. Hamou was in Boston that morning, wrapping up a successful round of business meetings that had moved her major film project well along. Confident and poised as always, she headed for Logan airport, looking to all passerby like a chic business woman full of energy and determination. No one suspected that she was secretly longing to settle down that evening in her cozy but elegant nest in the Hollywood Hills where she had planned a small celebratory soiree for her dearest friends.
As her plane soared into the air and she reclined her first-class seat back to sip her complimentary champagne at leisure, how was she to know that moments before an earlier flight had slammed into the World Trade Towers? Not until she was picked up by her chauffer in Los Angeles was she told about the attacks that morning. Poor Ms. Hamou, despite her iron demeanor and deep religious faith, was overcome with the mixed emotions of grief at so many tragic deaths and shock that she had so narrowly escaped a grisly end herself. As she remembered that she had planned to be on one of the flights that crashed into the Trade Towers but had moved to a later flight when she realized she could squeeze a trip to the Boston Childrens Hospital into her busy schedule before leaving town, she collapsed under the wave of emotions pouring over her.
Survivor’s guilt is a burden to anyone, and especially to someone as empathetic as Oma Hamou. As can be imagined, it was made all the worse when she began to hear the news of her many friends and business associates who lost their lives that day. However, her deep Orthodox faith is her constant companion and solace and, after a series of meetings with senior Church prelates to help her come to terms with her survivor guilt, she has recovered the poise and ebullience for which she has always been known to all friends and associates.
With the dust from the collapse of the World Trade Towers still settling, Ms. Hamou has declared herself ready to serve in any was possible. As attested by the international charitable foundation she has established, Sarskaia, Ms. Hamou has always had an ecumenical outlook to life, counting among her friends, spouses, relatives and associates Jews, Arabs, Russians, American Indians and the Irish. Given the fact that she has been a frequent traveler throughout the middle east, has strong Jewish connections, speaks Farsi fluently, and has managed many creative – some would even say daring -- deals with Arab businessmen, she fully expects in coming days to be able to offer her services to the U. S. State Department, with which she is a frequent correspondent on international matters.
Hamou tweeted:
"What a gorgeous fall afternoon here in California...I love the different colors in the leaves"
Boy. That must have been some long drive. And in a pickup, too.
Kudos.
Darling Blakele, again with the kvatch about how Nitzana Kedem, darling sister of my heart, isn't a real writer? Darling, Nitzi has had a long road back from her encounter with darling Omele, and can I just say after looking at darling Bob's list of those scammed by the darling girl, it is one crowded road --- anyway, darling, she is only recently able to put pen to paper and try to resume her shattered literary career and here you come with the idea that she isn't real, darling? Hasn't the poor girl carried her, you should excuse the expression, cross long enough?
And speaking of crosses, Yitzhak and Mary Margaret pushed off today back to Jerusalem. I'm not saying it was a pleasure to see them depart, but that might have been a hora the neighbors saw breaking out in my living room as they drove off.
And trust me, being so dumb you don't know that the planes were grounded n 9/11 isn't so much. My second cousin, the eternally single Muriel Fishbein, once went to Venice and sent my father a cable: "Streets filled with water. Please advise."
Also, darling Omele, it's not that I don't think of darling Rivka like a sister (I do!) but I have eaten with the woman, and if I can just mention, she ordered shrimp. Think about it, darling. It sort of makes me doubt that she's an undercover Moshein, either.
Also, what gives with the asking for initials, Omele? The way I heard it, AB told CD told EF told GH told IJ told KL told MN told OP (darling Andy Taylor's boychik!) told QR told ST told UV told WX told YZ.
SnoopOmaSand still can't manage to tell a proper lie! Check the weather for the last month in "Burbank". Mostly it has been very WARM, the upper 70s and low 80s. Yeah, sure the leaves are turning...right.
Palmdale on the other hand, has been in the upper 40s to low 60s, where leaves are far more likely to show fall colors.
Remember it complaining about the "heat" at "UCLA" when it was very cool in Westwood but very HOT in Palmdale? Yeah, it is a compulsive liar, just a really really bad one.
OH and it also wrote
Now how would you know I was I even a pick up today
Your ex husband and several others have said you have been a regular "pick up" on street corners for much of your life. So, why should today be any different?
Oh, Mitzi, my dear. I'm so glad you popped in today, because Blake's post about Nitzana Kedem not being real has thrown me into a dither.
Blake seems to know what he's talking about, but if Nitzana Kedem isn't real, then I'd like to know just who is singing karaoke (and rather well, at that) at the Crazy Coconut in Palm Springs and calling herself Schvitzin' Nitzi, the Mayhem Kedem.
Now, I don't want you to think I frequent bars, my pets, because I don't. But my nephew Horst has taken too much to drink, and I have to mount the occasional rescue mission.
Poor Horst. He was always such a sweet boy and felt things so very deeply. But ever since that little experiment in Brazil didn't pan out, Horst just seemed to lose his way. That's what they say about the sensitive ones. They carry the weight of the world on their shoulders, and when they stumble it's just too, too hard for them to get up again.
Anyhoo, Mitzi, could you perhaps give me a description of Nitzi so that I can figure out what's going on at the Coconut? Ever since I found out that Betty Ford (or whoever she was) was a fraud, I just find myself so suspicious about every little thing.
I would ask Ms. Hamou / McConnell / Murphy / Moran / Hanoi, but she's been so busy today with other things that I hate to intrude.
Plus I get the feeling that she'd rather not hear Nitzana Kedem's name again.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"you and your creepy friend will be arrested!"
Well, first the police will need a warrant.
You know. It's one of those things that get served on you from time to time.
What an extraordinary post SnoopOmaSand put up. She listed the legal woes of various Congressmen, including:
Spousal abuse
Fraud
Writing bad checks
Shoplifting
Bankrupting businesses
Assault
Being defendants in lawsuits
Drug charges
And then she said it meant SHE was in good company, meaning that she had these things in common with Congress members.
Extraordinary.
In response to my post about having to drive a long way to see leaves, Oma Hamou posted last night:
"You have no legal right to have anyone follow me"
Uh, why would you go off on a rant over a gibe about not living near trees?
You say you live in Burbank, where there are plenty of trees. If that's true, then obviously no one is following you or reporting your whereabouts to anyone here.
Besides, since you have gone to the police about Bob Atchison having you beaten up -- and say you are going to present the court with medical records proving that beating just any day now -- things are well in hand. The Burbank police will protect you, and the court will put Atchison under a restraining order.
By the way, why haven't you gotten around to presenting your proof of the beating to the court? You've been posting about it for a couple of weeks now.
Honestly, I really can't see any reason at all for such a delay when your life is in danger.
Oh, wait. I can see one reason.
You're a liar.
Oh, my dears. What a wonderful idea I've just had!
With Ms. Hamou / McConnell / Murphy / Moran / Hanoi sharing so many credentials with Congressmen, it's obvious, don't you think? She should run for election herself.
And just think of all the advantages. She could make the FBI and the police take her seriously. She could get judges to believe her tales of beatings and hospitalizations and illnesses. She could get a staffer to drive her around in a real car with four doors and everything.
And just think of the campaign slogans and catchy political nicknames:
"Oma Coma"
"Hamou Can Do"
"Meth for the Masses"
"Aliases for All"
"Deficit Spending Schmending"
"Old Guns and Tits"
"The Desert Torpedo"
"Catch Me If You Can"
"Grift is Thrift"
"Write checks now, don't bother making them good later, will balance the budget"
"Oma Hamou knows all the Tricks"
Look, people. We torpedoes just want to be left out of this.
We've seen the un-photoshopped pictures, and that "sex torpedo" couldn't make it across a mudhole.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"I can prove it in a court of law"
But first you have to show up in court when the other party is present.
You said you were going to "prove" that Atchison committed perjury. But your Bill of Review was kicked out.
You said you were going to "prove" that you were bankrupt and should be absolved of your debts. But your petition was kicked out.
You said you were going to "prove" that a restraining order against Atchison was warranted. But your case was kicked out.
You said you were going to get the California sister state judgment dismissed. But you didn't.
You said you were going to get your felony records in Utah, Wyoming, and Montana expunged. But you didn't.
You said you were going to get Patrick O'Connor arrested. But you didn't.
You said you were going to show the court "proof" that you were prevented by medical reasons for attending court on October 23. But you didn't.
The only place you can "prove" anything is on the internet and in your own mind. You are an utter and consistent failure in front of a judge.
Which is why you've had more bench warrants issued against you than most people have parking tickets.
SnoopOmaSand also "insists" that some prosecutor somewhere is going to go after Bob for "perjury" in the judgment he got against her.
Why is this delusional? simple: The Statute of Limitations for perjury in Texas is 3 years. NO PROSECUTOR will waste their time on a case they CAN NOT BRING because the Statute of Limitations has lapsed.
SnoopOmaSand always believes that Statutes of Limitations don't apply to it, Courts on the other hand enforce them utterly.
What a dimwitted liar SnoopOmaSand is. "Perjury" is a crime. One can only be guilty of perjury after being charged and a hearing held. That's how the legal system works.
District attorneys can not use an 'allegation' of perjury for anyting (remember in the US one is innocent until proven guilty.
It would be pathetic, really, but SnoopOmaSand is so mentally delusional that it believes these fictional tales it spins it's fast going grey head.
Remember the piece of paper it filed a full year ago to "quash" the Bench Warrant, but it NEVER DID ANYTHING ABOUT?
Yeah, that one.
Delusional liar.
If Hamou could prove to a court that Atchison obtained his judgment in Texas improperly, she would have appealed the judgment.
She didn't.
If Hamou could prove to a court that Atchison obtained his judgment improperly, she would have attacked the sister state judgment in California.
She didn't.
It's that simple.
All this crap on the internet about his committing perjury only started when she realized that Atchison, unlike so many of her other judgment creditors, was actually coming after her for the money.
And she knows now that nobody and nothing will stop him.
Not legal fees. Not the police. Not judges. Not bankruptcy courts. Not petitions for restraining orders. Not claims of beatings and hospitalizations.
And she knows she's heading for another bench warrant -- now a local one -- when she doesn't appear for the debtor examination that has been ordered in California.
She has almost two dozen outstanding judgments against her, and the bag of tricks she has developed over the years to evade them has worked for her in the past.
With Atchison it doesn't. That's why she's over on her forum screeching hysterically about using guns to defend herself.
She never thought to find herself up against such a determined creditor, and it's driving her bat shit crazy.
Too bad.
Thank you for writing that, Blake.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"I was and am entitled to file a Texas Bill of Review which was/is equivalent to an Appeal"
So says the Woman Who Sued Herself.
Actually, a Bill of Review is unique to Texas and is a very different legal proceeding from an appeal, with different threshold requirements. An appeal is a review of things that happened during the trial. A Bill of Review is a review of things that happened outside the trial, and it is not available to a party who could have appealed but didn't.
In fact, that is the very reason that Hamou's Bill of Review was thrown out by the court. She persists in calling it a "mere technicality". Actually, it was a fundamental failure to meet the core jurisdictional criterion.
The difference rests on the difference between claims based on intrinsic evidence and on extrinsic evidence.
Of course, given Hamou's atrocious failure to master basic English grammar and her constant botching the use of legal concepts, the difference between intrinsic and extrinsic completely eludes her.
That is, after all, why she is the Woman Who Sued Herself -- by getting the difference between a plaintiff and a defendant confused.
That's just how stupid she is in these matters.
SnoopOmaSand could have appealed Bob's victory. Failed to do so.
SnoopOmaSand tried to challenge the victory judgment by Bill of Review. Failed to do so
SnoopOmaSand could have challenged the Sister State Judgment in California. Failed to do so.
SnoopOmaSand could have brought a Motion to Quash the Texas Bench Warrant. Failed to do so.
SnoopOmaSand could have shown up in Texas and explained to the Court in person why she refuses to comply with their orders. Failed to do so
SnoopOmaSand had a lawyer in Texas, who she could have sent to the Court to explain her refusal to comply with Court orders. Failed to do so
SnoopOmaSand could have appealed Refai's victory judgment. Failed to do so
SnoopOmaSand tried to have Patrick arrested for violating the TRO. Failed to do so
SnoopOmaSand tried to pursue a RICO claim. Failed to do so
SnoopOmaSand tried to pursue a Civil restraining order against Bob. Failed to do so
Wanted to make a major "movie". Failed.
Wanted to be a movie star. Failed
Been a "famous model" Failed
Wanted to be a major force in the Restoration of the Alexander Palace. Failed
Like Judge Judy says "Shoulds, Coulda, Woulda", what really matters is what you manage to actually accomplish.
SnoopOmaSand has accomplished Nothing, well nothing of value anyway. She has accomplished to amass dozens of civil judgments against her, two bench warrants for her arrest, numerous Court orders of Contempt of Court, Felony convictions, Animal abuse convictions, numerous evictions, repossessed vehicles, and a large number of people who contact regularly who all to a one consider her evil (their words and not necessarily mine).
Judge deeds, not words.
I do apologize that I misspoke in my last post.
SnoopOmaSand did not accomplish 2 Bench Warrants for its arrest.
It has accomplished a whopping SEVEN Bench Warrants for its arrest:
THREE Felony FUGITIVE FROM JUSTICE No Bail Criminal Arrest Warrants issued for its arrest for violating all THREE Felony Conviction Probation sentences.
One Felony Arrest Warrant for its arrest for Failing to Appear at the Criminal Animal Abuse Hearing.
One Bench Warrant issued for its failure to appear after numerous traffic violations for Driving without License, Driving Without Insurance and driving without registration.
and then the Two OUTSTANDING Bench Warrants for its failure to comply with Court Ordered Appearances.
My apologies for the inaccuracy in counting SnoopOmaSand's Bench Warrant tally.
and SnoopOmaSand has managed to accomplish spending approximately one full year out of its fifty years of age sitting in a jail cell.
2% of one's life sitting in jail. That's quite an accomplishment indeed.
For comparison, Bob, I, Blake, Rebecca, Mitz,Penelope, have a cumulative amount of time in jail for our lives of Zero days and a cumulative number of Bench Warrants in our combined lives of Zero, None, Nada, Niente, Rien
Night everyone. Sleep Well. I know Bob and I will.
But Rob, don't you understand?
ALL those bench warrants are Bob Atchison's fault.
Even the ones relating to cases about which he knew nothing.
Even the ones from before the time he first knew of her.
Bob Atchison is the ONLY reason she's never answered a court summons.
Remember the lies she told Dun & Bradstreet; from their damaging investigation of the Enigma fraud:
DUN & BRADSTREET EXPOSES OMA HAMOU AND ENIGMA FILMS
In previous interviews with Oma Hamou, principal, it was indicated that Enigma Royal Films LLC started in 1999 and operates as a film production company with 100 employees. It was further indicated that the company operates from the residence of Oma Hamou with a 5,362 square foot three story building in the rear of the property. In addition, it was indicated that the company is in the process of leasing space at 100 Universal City Plaza Drive, Universal City, CA (Universal Studios Inc). A phone number of (818) 349-3736 was also provided. She further indicated that she is a member of the California Attorney's For Criminal Justice.
A check with the Delaware Secretary of State on Oct 10, 2000 shows that the company is registered as a limited liability company as of Sep 14, 2000. A check with the California Secretary of State on Oct 9, 2000 revealed no record of the company registered as a foreign limited liability company to conduct business in the state of California. A check with the Los Angeles County Business Licensing Department records as of Apr 15, 2000 revealed no record of the required license for the company. In addition, a check with the Los Angeles County Registrar/Recorder Office on Oct 10, 2000 revealed no record of Enigma Royal Films LLC registered as a fictitious name in the county. Also, a check with the California Attorney's For Criminal Justice on Oct 11, 2000 found no record of Oma Hamou as a member.
A check with the property manager of 100 Universal City Plaza Drive, Universal City, CA on Oct 13, 2000 revealed no record of Enigma Royal Films LLC currently in the process of leasing space at that address. A check with directory assistance on Oct 9, 2000 showed no business listing for the company in the Northridge, CA area.
The original Business Information Report was created on Oct 3, 2000. Due to the above discrepancies, a reference start date of 2000 will be utilized, and credit and financial information will be withheld.
THE LIE THAT FOLLOWED
How did Oma explain this? She claimed that I somehow flew to Southern California, stole her cell phone and impersonated her on the phone to Dun & Bradstreet without her knowing!
The pathological lying started from the very beginning - huge lies of a $66M trust fund - Spielberg and top Hollywood stars - Universal Studios location, 100 employees. That's amazing stuff - an astounding level of lying. The fraud grew and grew and roped in many victims (including me), almost $1M in judgments against Hamou that resulted from her lies.
It is always hard for me to figure out what names to use when mentioning her. Kennedy? Moran? McConnell - I could go on and on with more names she has used.
Cancer and baby adoption scams, phoney rapes, animal abuse, wow - this is epic stuff that just goes on and on.
SnoopOmaSand wants to know "how many versions" of the false Dunn & Bradstreet Bob has created? Well, just one version exists, the original report which is here for the world to see:
http://omahamoureport.org/OmaDB.gif
I see Hamou's decision to "heed the advice" of law enforcement and ignore our posts lasted all of 14 hours.
Today SnoopOmaSand posted:
"no one believes you won your judgment against me because you were honest"
No one, except of course for:
- the judge in the case
- the jury in the case
- the judge who ordered her to a debtor's exam in Texas
- the judge who issued the bench warrant for her arrest
- the lawyers who have taken Atchison's cases
- the people on this blog
- the people (including former housemates of Hamou) who have contacted Bob and Rob with information about other scams Hamou has run
Hamou's credibility has gotten so bad and her reputation so widespread that the Glendale Police, far from "investigating" Bob, actually called his attorney with a courtesy heads up that she had filed a complaint. They didn't even want any information from the attorney.
But Hamou's right. "No one" believes Bob is honest.
No one except all the above people.
Blake, the Glendale officer also was quite clear that if they were going to bother to do anything on her complant, Bob's attorney would be notified immediately.
So far, six weeks and nothing but quiet and silence.
Actually, the lack of hearing a peep from law enforcement about all of SnoopOmaSand's alleged complaints has been going on for over ten years now. And counting.
Res Ipsa Loquitor.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"Maybe that is because they can prove the case"
Yeah, right. Police call up people they are going to charge with a crime to say, "hi, we just wanted to let you know that we got a complaint on you. Bye."
Detective Munoz in Burbank asked Hamou several times to provide him with proof of her allegations.
I guess she just decided to drop it off over at the Glendale Police instead.
Other than to her victims, she's become a laughing stock.
The Dun & Bradstreet report is now in the public domain as an exhibit in documents supporting the lawsuit and judgment I won against Oma Hamou.
That was a great day when I won in court. It was a wonderful, personal endorsement to have full support of the judge and the jury.
Blake isn't Bob. Nor am I. Blake is somebody totally different, but I've been in contact with him, which is how he knows what the Police said to Bob's attorney. Dimwit.
I don't really understand why Hamou persists with all these claims of what the police are going to do.
She started making these claims in the hope that it would scare us off from bringing her history of running con games to light.
But, as Rob said, after years of such claims about imminent police action that never comes, the prattling on about it just renders her ridiculous.
And there is obviously now enough on her in law enforcement databases that no police officer is going to take anything she says seriously.
In these days of massively overloaded police departments, especially in Los Angeles, they are not going to spend a lot of time prosecuting her petty con games, which is how she gets by with them. These days they don't even prosecute car theft in Los Angeles County unless a car jacking is involved. Instead, they try to fob non-violent cases off onto the civil justice system.
Two cases illustrate the point that Hamou is not prosecuted for her con games, not because they are not crimes, but because of Los Angeles County police overload:
As soon as Hamou left L.A. County with one of her recent con games, she got herself slammed into jail under a $1 million bond on a felony fraud charge. She learned her lesson and slithered back to the underbelly of Los Angeles County where her con games are less likely to get her ass tossed in jail.
The other case was the matter of animal abuse. Since there is a special agency in Los Angeles County charged with pursuing animal abuse cases and the regular police aren't burdened with them, she was prosecuted for that -- and convicted.
But when someone does take his case against her to the civil justice system, what happens?
They win.
Blake you wrote:
"Detective Munoz in Burbank asked Hamou several times to provide him with proof of her allegations."
Actually it was worse - he asked to provide ANY EVIDENCE of ANY KIND to back up her claims - and she couldn't because it was a complete lie she made up.
Her "story", as he related to me. was so nonsensical, illogical, absurd and silly, that it was obvious she had just made it up.
For a woman who has a slew of detectives waiting in the wings to testify on her behalf, it's interesting that none of them have ever shown up with her in court, nor have any of their names ever so much as been mentioned in any of her rambling court pleadings.
Part of the problem is that she herself often blows off court appearances.
And the rest of the problem is that we know what these detectives said, and not a one of them will back up her crock of bull.
These detectives are just like her promises that she's going to "prove" this and that: empty threats for internet consumption -- but never for a judge's ears.
What is really cool? That we know a great many things for a fact that SnoopOmaSand doesn't "know" yet that we do, and we know a great many more things that SnoopOmaSand doesn't yet know of at all.
To quote Master Yoda: a great many things this one must learn.
More lies from SnoopOmaSand:
Mon Nov 18, 2013 11:32 am
I responded to counsel on behalf of Bob Atchison that no where on this forum have I stated Bob Atchison is the reason why I was assaulted on Tuesday as the incident is being investigated by law enforcement and I would have appeared on the 23rd at the hearing had I not been medically incapacitated. It appears, Mr. Atchison has once again lied to counsel representing him. :wink:
BUT!It has posted subsequently proving this statement was a LIE! Total complete and deliberate LIE
by Oma Hamou on Sat Nov 23, 2013 11:49 am
I was harmed on October 22, 2013 because someone connected to Bob Atchison sent someone to harm me, I sustained real injuries
by Oma Hamou on Mon Nov 25, 2013 9:37 am
the sitting Judge will confirm the only reason it was dismissed was because either you or someone connected to you sent men to harm me on the 22nd so I wouldn't appear in court and because I didn't appear to fight you, you bastard, is the only reason it was dismissed
by Oma Hamou on Mon Nov 25, 2013 10:33 am
My civil restraining order was dismissed because I wasn't there, Bob Atchison did not say the things he pretends he did in open court on the 23rd of October, 2013. It was dismissed because I wasn't there to defend it because either Bob or someone else connected to him sent men to harm me.
by Oma Hamou on Tue Nov 26, 2013 12:23 pmOn October 22, 2013, I was assaulted because either he or someone connected to him sent men to harm me so I wouldn't appear at the second restraining order hearing and it would be dismissed.
by Oma Hamou on Tue Nov 26, 2013 9:20 pm
and I on October 22, 2013, I was assaulted by men who were sent to harm me all because of Bob Atchison and his Alexander Palace Time
Machine.
Talk about lack of credibility!
Well, no matter.
Hamou has been posting for weeks that she is going to prove to the judge that she did not appear in court because she was beaten by men sent by Atchison.
However, for some odd reason, while she can post about it endlessly, she cannot seem to find a way actually to do it.
No worries. She's about to find the opportunity presented to her on a silver platter to put her proof before the judge.
No doubt she'll welcome it.
Hamou is tweeting again about dog rescue.
Given the conditions that Huiku Batchelor, San Bernardino Animal Control, Eric Cowan, Cheryl Poindexter, the cable repairmen, and Los Angeles Animal Control observed in her homes -- resulting in many of the animals being put down and her conviction for animal abuse -- that's really creepy.
It's almost like watching Hannibal Lecter roam the streets looking for a snack.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"FYI, during my conversation yesterday with Detective Munoz if he needed any additional information from me, just let me know!"
Could you try that again, in standard English this time?
You seem to be trying to say that Detective Munoz has all the information he needs.
So then we may expect to see criminal charges filed just any day now, right?
Right.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"I called the Burbank Court House nothing new has been filed in my name."
Patience, dear. Patience.
We know how anxious you are to present your proof to the judge.
You'll get your chance.
Yes, she will Blake. I will have her before a judge in a court of law so she can testify under oath about these despicable lies she has been spreading about me. I will be there, just like last time. That's the way it's going to have to be until she gets shut down by the courts.
Why is nobody surprised that SnoopOmaSand considers someone who is a Felony Animal Abuser is a "wonderful human being"? It admires success after all.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"I am more than ready!"
Well, it's about time. You've been posting for years about all the proof you're going to be putting before judges; all the case rulings you're going to get reversed; all the police, lawyers, prosecutors, and judges who are going to testify on your behalf.
But what have we actually seen?
You had "proof" that Atchison lied in the trial against you. But you failed to appeal.
You were going to "prove" in the Bill of Review that Atchison produced false documents at trial. But the Bill got dismissed.
You were going to get your three felony convictions in Utah, Wyoming, and Montana expunged. But they're still on the public record.
You dared Bob to file for a sister state judgment in California, promising that you'd get California to reverse the judgment against you. He did, but you failed to challenge the judgment, and it's now been finalized and is unappealable.
You filed two bankruptcy petitions, saying you were going to use them to get Bob's judgment against you reversed. But you withdrew the first petition when you found out Bob had obtained the fraudulent mortgage loan documents from your scam against O'Connor. And the second petition was dismissed when you failed to show up for three Debtor Meetings or to file schedules.
You were going to get the bench warrant in Texas rescinded. But you've filed nothing, and it still stands.
You were going to refile your RICO suit against Bob to prove all the threats and conspiracies you allege. But you didn't. (Which is a shame, as it would be a hoot to see you explain that forged signature on a proof of service to Judge Klausner.)
You were going to get the judge to reverse the dismissal of your application for a restraining order against Bob. But you've filed nothing.
As Rob pointed out the other day, your entire life has been a fantasy of great accomplishments with nothing -- nothing -- actually having been accomplished (other than a considerable arrest record, criminal history, and long string of lost civil actions).
Given your track record, you can see why we're less than impressed with your prattle about "future litigation" and how ready you are for the next round in court.
I'll be shocked -- but highly entertained -- if you even show up.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"I am going to heed the advice of the FBI in Houston and the Burbank Police department, and that is, you know, I am going to not even look at Bob Atchison's spouse's libelous site, for awhile"
Hmmm. The last time you posted something like this, you managed to stay gone less than 14 hours.
But I'm sure the FBI and the police have advised you to quit looking at this blog. They're sick and tired of hearing from you about it.
The farce that is Richman's federal lawsuit against Rob Moshein continues.
Richman was apparently clueless about what the first order of dismissal meant and filed a motion for reconsideration.
The judge then denied that motion, saying that Richman already had leave to amend his complaint and did not need to ask the court again.
In the court's words:
"Richman misconstrues the Court's dismissal Order."
Then the judge went on to point out yet another flub, noting that Richman's motion was missing a noticed date and time of hearing.
Then, for the third time in this one case, the court "encourages Richman to seek assistance from the Federal Pro Se Clinic." (Richman was given this advice by the court when he first filed for pro se representation. He was given the advice for the second time when his lawsuit was dismissed. And now he's given it for the third time.)
Now remember -- Richman is a man who holds himself out to the public in advertising as an accomplished paralegal with vast experience in all areas of the law and with specific experience in federal court pleadings.
Yet he can't even get his own lawsuit against Moshein off the ground due to one pleading error after another.
More accolades for Bob from the Alexander Palace Museum!
http://eng.tzar.ru/info/info-events/title/?id=3250
You were right Blake. SnoopOmaSand couldn't go without posting on her forum for even a whole day!
The kudos from the Palace to Bob were just too much for its ego to stand, obviously.
Even a few minutes -
A con artist with OCD. No wonder all her scams unwind on her.
17 hours ago Oma Hamou tweeted:
"I have a high temperature, sore throat and feeling yucky, crawled under my blankets, watching t.v. took some Nyqil n hope 2 feel better"
Then 4 hours ago she tweeted:
"What a beautiful morning it is here in California, I have much 2 to do, hope every 1 has a terrific day!"
Boy, that was some dose of Nyquil. Maybe that's what they should have given her in the Emergency Room after her brutal beating on October 22.
Seriously, Blake? That is simply incredible.
HA HAH HAH!!!
SnoopOmaSand bought a book to increast its "word power"?? roflamo.
That's like a paraplegic buying skis.
I suggest it looks for a good used copy of "The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language" or "Chicago Manual of Style". LOL
MORALES UPDATE
The lesbian waitress accused of falsely claiming a couple left her an offensive note instead of a tip has started paying back well-wishers who donated thousands of dollars to her, it emerged today.
Dayna Morales, 22, seems to finally be doing the decent thing in returning the cash she took from unsuspecting supporters after her claims made national headlines.
Morales, a waitress at Gallop Asian Bistro, in Bridgewater, New Jersey, claimed a couple dining at the restaurant had left her a note saying 'I cannot tip because I don't believe in your lifestyle' instead of a tip.
But the former marine's story fell apart just days later when the couple came forward with their copy of the receipt showing an $18 tip.
Then former friends of hers joined the chorus claiming that she was a compulsive liar who had pretended she had terminal cancer and even that her father had raped her and killed her baby by throwing it down the stairs.
Note: sound familiar? Have we heard a similar story more than once?
She even said she was the sole survivor of a bomb blast in Afghanistan. But it then transpired she had never seen action overseas and in fact had been dishonorably discharged.
That was not before many who had been moved by her tale of prejudice stepped forward to donate money to her, which Morales had previously said she would give to LGBT charities and Wounded Warriors, a charity founded to help injured servicemen.
Yesterday, Wounded Warriors said they had received nothing from Morales.
It seems Morales has instead decided to return the donations instead of pass it on to the charity.
Today, people have come forward to reveal she has in fact apparently seen the error of her ways and started to return the cash. Some estimates of her total haul were around $3,000.
It is not known if she has refunded the entirety of the cash.
Ann Farnum-Messano posted on Have A Gay Day's Facebook page - the same organization that advocates for tolerance that Morales used to first broadcast her tale of woe.
She said: 'I just got a refund from Dayna Morales. I hope she gets some help.'
Another woman, Vivian S. Bedoya, posted that she too 'received a PayPal refund' and felt she had been taken for a terrible ride by the duping server.
'When I saw the name I knew it didn't bode well and found out how gullible I am.'
Meanwhile, MailOnline has independently confirmed through an interview with a Gallop Bistro co-owner that there were massive cracks in Morales' story.
The co-owner, who only gave his name as Jack, said that after the family came forward to claim Morales was lying, the waitress changed her story again.
He said: ‘The next day news is so big, and I tell Dayna “You need to talk to me. Talk to the manager. It gets so big. And she said, “I put in the $18 dollar tip.”
‘“What the reason,” he asks Morales. “Talk to me.”’
But Morales seemed incapable of explanation. ‘She says to me, ‘Everything is blown, blown so big.’
But asked point blank if Morales would be fired if she was found of wrongdoing - Jack said nothing was certain.
You cannot say that,’ he said. ‘You have no proof that she did wrong and can’t assume that she’s wrong. You have no proof.’
Morales has since been suspended and retained a lawyer, MailOnline has learned, while the restaurant have hired their own lawyers. Their investigation is due to be completed next week.
Michael Knote, founder of Ohio-based Have A Gay Day told MailOnline that he was disheartened but Dayna Morales' lowball tactics.
'I feel let down,' he said. 'That someone would have the ability to just lie like this.
Note: we know how you feel.
MORE MORALES
...
Shortly after the New Jersey couple emerged with their receipts, former friends and colleagues of Morales also came forward and claimed she is a pathological liar.
"She lied to me about having cancer and did a whole other mess of things she stayed at my house and lied to all my family and friends," Kiersten Lynn Bremer, 23, a former friend of Morales wrote on Facebook.
Bremer says she met Morales two years ago when Morales was then engaged to her close friend, Teresa Rivera, and that Morales was dishonorably discharged from the Marines and lied about having oiliodendraglioma, an incurable form of brain cancer, among other things.
Maybe Morales had one of those "go anywhere" forms of cancer that pop up as needed, spread by unique vectors, and then get conveniently forgotten about.
You know, like Hamou's rectal cancer that spread to her uterus. Or was it her uterine cancer that spread to her rectum?
In any case, she weathered it to go on to heart palpitations, deadly infections, rapes, miscarriages, beatings, and really yucky colds.
Hamou responded to a tweet post of beautiful beach pictures by saying it looked a lot like where she lives in California.
Well, it's true that California has beautiful beaches. But they're quite a drive from where she lives in California.
Especially in a truck.
So Hamou is going to call Detective Munoz to tell him that she is being stalked.
Her proof?
That I erroneously claim she is being driven around in a pickup truck instead of driving a white Mercedes, and that I erroneously claim she does not live in Burbank.
With proof like that it's much easier to understand why all the "proof" she is always on the verge of presenting to police, judges, and juries never seems to turn the trick for her.
Uh, Hamou. Nobody said that your Mercedes got repossessed anywhere. Nothing is "yours" unless you are born with it, given it, or pay for it.
And you really are the world's worst at fishing to see what we know. (Or course, you are the Woman Who Sued Herself.)
No one here contacted anyone about the repossession in Bakersfield, little old lady or otherwise.
Your saying that we not only contacted her, but then harassed her, just lets us know that you're spinning another whopper.
Hamou posted:
"I can't wait to hear your explanation to Detective Munoz why you published lies about him on the web"
I'm just a phone call away, and I'll be happy to talk to him when he calls.
Munoz has my number and can call me anytime. I would like to give him an update.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"does those lies empower you"
Does those lies? Just how many grammar classes did you cut in grade school?
As for calling Detective Munoz, I've got no real need to talk to him. If he has some need to talk to me, I'll be happy to oblige.
I have a listed number, so it should be easy enough for him to reach me, since you say the FBI, the police, and your crack "IT team" know who I am.
Hamou posted:
"I will publish on the web just exactly what they [the police] thought of you and your lies and so called evidence from their actual reports"
Well, it's about time. You've been promising to do this for ages.
When may we expect to see these? Later today?
Blake, I suspect SnoopOmaSand will post that right after it posts the Hospital record which "proves" it was doped up on morphine so couldn't attend the hearing when her Restraining order was dismissed...
It keeps posting the 2005 ER discharge paper from Brackenridge Hospital when it had a little cold and was given mild cold medicine, but one wonders why it hasn't posted the recent one at all.
See?? I TOLD you there is no hospital record proving it was on morphine. Just like there is no police report to document any beating!
If it were real, it would be plastered all over the net, like that decades old photo of bruises it keeps trotting out...
You are right, Rob. It doesn't exist.
First, Hamou posts a couple of hours ago that she will "publish on the web" the police reports that prove the police didn't believe what was said about her.
So I call her on the bluff, and what do I get back?
This:
"I will not post any content of any report other than what has already been published"
Since she has not yet published a single police report from any agency -- despite years of claiming she is about to -- this sentence means absolutely nothing other than she has nothing to publish.
Of course, we know full well that the police do not make their investigative reports available to parties to an investigation. All her claims that she has or has seen such reports are just another one of the long cords of lies from which she weaves the webs of her con games.
These imaginary police reports are just like all the "proof" she is going to show judges, all the "witnesses" she is going to bring forward to prove we are liars, all the "future litigation" she is going to launch to vanquish us: smoke and mirrors.
She's a con artist. It's how they work.
I am simply not going to put up with the Oma Hamou McConnell lie that I ordered people to attack her. It did not happen this time or any of the other times she has made this claim. I have never threatened violence against anyone in my entire life.
She will soon find out what I and my attorney are doing to stop this.
http://www.uptodate.com/contents/image?imageKey=ONC%2F17969&topicKey=ONC%2F2814&rank=4~150&source=see_link&search=Pain+management
Interesting. The effects of morphine only last for about 3 hours. The purported document,heavily whited out so nobody can know what it really says, shows "Morphine" allegedly given at 8:54pm. So it would have not had any effects after say 1 or 2 am.
Also, Lorazepam was given. An anti anxiety pill. Zorfran for anti-nausea, saline solution for dehydration.
and Naproxen, which belongs to a class of drugs called nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Other members of this class include ibuprofen (Motrin), indomethacin (Indocin), nabumetone (Relafen) and several others. These drugs are used for the management of mild to moderate pain, fever, and inflammation. As the Judge rightly said, it is "Alleve" and sold over the counter.
No wonder SnoopOmaSand never went back to see that Judge. He had it busted from the start.
That document has more holes in it than Swiss Cheese. In fact, there is no evidence it has anything to do with SnoopOmaSand, other than "OMA" typed on the bottom. Most interesting is that it also purports to be page 38 of 102!
One Hundred Two pages? For a medical record? It takes weeks and many many procedures to make up over a hundred pages of medical records. My late Dad was in Intensive Care and it took a week to accumulate that many pages!
Given her history of faking documents (remember the whited out NSF stamp on Eric Cowan's check?) the likelihood is high this is something SnoopOmaSand has forged.
Certainly not the first time.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"these men are still trying to locate my whereabouts"
No, we're not.
She then posted to Bob Atchison:
"I will countersue with more than just that one cause of action as I did when you filed your civil suit against me in 2003"
Uh, huh. And did you win?
Well, I was there in the courtroom with my attorney and the document that was turned over to the judge as evidence of her injuries and treatment at the hospital - the hospital records - had absolutely no reference to morphine - just the "Alleve" the judge noted.
She didn't show in the courtroom because Jim Sproul told her on the phone I was there with my attorney. That's the reason.
The judge head the crazy lie of the attack and threw her case out - just like that that.
Next she posted:
"Here is more snippets"
Here is more snippets?
Good Lord, the woman must have failed fourth grade.
Bob, did that document look 102 pages thick?
It's interesting that Hamou, although publicly prattling on and on about being beaten on October 22, chose not to post any of the doctor's observations that would support such a claim.
Morphine can be given for a lot of things. There is absolutely nothing in that document she posted that supports the claim of a beating.
Maybe she learned her lesson a couple of years ago when she posted her medical record after supposedly being kicked in the abdomen by a man in boots. The record failed to note either that she claimed such an injury or that the doctor observed signs of such an injury.
Having been called out on it, she's now just decided to white-out almost everything.
Unfortunately, to use her own word, it makes the document "meaningless".
So now Hamou has posted a "snippet" of her medical record.
It claims she suffered blunt force trauma to the side of her head (left eye), had "multiple" head injuries, and had a mass somewhere.
Yet the ER released her the same evening of a beating that left her with multiple head injuries and some kind of mass.
There's something fishy here. And it ain't the seafood.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"What I have published does not contain the words: left eye another lie told by this criminal predator stalker."
The record you posted says "Blunt Force Trauma, OS".
"OS" is the abbreviation of occulus sinister, the medical term for "left eye".
It's interesting that you didn't know that the medical record you posted indicated your injury was at your left eye.
As I said, there's something fishy here. This is looking like another one of your cut-and-paste forgeries.
Nitwit.
Hamou also posted:
"Emergency Rooms throughout this wonderful country of ours, every day, releases people with these kind of injuries"
Emergency Rooms releases?
Does they really?
Boy, your grammar just gets more and more infantile the more rattled you get.
Hamou posted:
"Being that I am not a physician I would have never had known this."
You would have never had known?
So you're not a grammarian, either, huh?
Blake - the document I and the judge saw was two pages....
Blake - the judge went through the hospital record Jim Sproul turned over to him very carefully and interrogated Sproul about it, Hamou's condition and why she wasn't in the courtroom. There was nothing stronger than the "Alleve" type pills in that document.
This is extremely fishy. The judge didn't fall for it in the courtroom and neither do we.
I and my attorney were able to outline to the judge - at great length and in detail - Hamou's long rap sheet and history of not showing up in court. We had case numbers and dates.
It was so, so obvious what antics she was up to again. The result was the judge immediately and totally dismissed her case. Over, slam dunk.
Hamou lost again - as she has every time. Judge after judge (and a jury) have heard her BS about me any my attorney lying - she said this in court to the jury. The jury completely discounted it. They believed me - not her - wonder why....
I always win. Now that everything will be in California it will be much easier to enforce my judgment, the sanctions and future victories I will certainly have and very soon.
Yes, Bob. That document from "one of the specialists" she had to see is extremely fishy.
For starters, I've seen a lot of doctors' reports, and I've never seen one that began with "I had the pleasure of seeing".
And nothing in the document indicates the doctor made an independent examination of her but instead just reviewed records she provided.
There are doctors who make themselves available to litigants who need "medical reports" that say what the litigants need them to say. In fact, there is a whole cadre of them in places such as New Jersey who specialize in providing "medical reports" to a type of con artists known as "bus jumpers". These are people who jump on city buses that have had minor accidents and then claim they were severely injured. Typically an accomplice has caused the accident by some ploy such as switching lanes in front of the bus and then hitting the brakes.
And the names of these cooperative doctors circulate freely among con artists.
I have a suspicion Hamou availed herself of such a service after the original medical record she sent into court with Jim Sproul did not turn the trick for her.
Fortunately, judges are onto these ruses and know how to pick them apart line by line if need be.
Any judge who sees her long history of avoiding inconvenient court appearances will do so.
At any rate, you and your attorney will get the opportunity to examine the medical records relating to this alleged beating in full before too long, including cross-examining the doctors.
Peace, brother.
You know, folks, the acid test of whether those "medical records" will actually support the claim Hamou says they do is putting them in front of a judge for him to review.
And guess what: SHE HASN'T . . .
. . . despite three weeks of claims on the internet that she is going to use them to get her case reinstated.
But no matter. Bob and his attorney will see that they get before a judge.
More holes in the SnoopOmaSand crazy town tales.
1. Where is the POLICE REPORT? The 911 call??
2. How does SnoopOmaSand "know" that what Bob said about the Judge were "lies"? IT was NOT THERE! Bob was, his attorney was and both of them say the exact same thing. SnoopOmaSand loves to crow that I "don't know because I wasn't in a Court room" for some things, so the same goes for it. You can't say it was a lie if you weren't THERE.
3. Most important. Found this on a well respected medical site:
The leading cause of blunt trauma is automobile accidents, but it can also result from sports injuries, assaults, or explosion. The vast majority are caused by car-to-car crashes where the driver impacts the steering wheel or dashboard Hmmm, the dashboard, like maybe in a beat up old Chevy truck on the way home from dinner at McDonalds or Denny's or maybe a trip to Walmart??
Blunt force trauma alone is no evidence whatsoever of a BEATING.
Yes, Blake - she is going to have the opportunity to show a judge all of these documents and prove they are real. She is going to have to prove her claims I had her attacked - which she can't because it didn't happen.
Yes, Rob, where is the 911 call recording, the police report? She will have to provide them or we will get them.
PBS putting our garden on TV must really get to SnoopOmaSand, it keeps linking to the episode over and over and over, why else would it keep doing that if not out of the sheer jealousy and huge blow to its ego that we were on Television while it lives in squalor and filth.
As usual, Hamou is trying to change a topic that's gotten too hot for her.
Those "medical records" she posted will remain absolutely meaningless UNTIL SHE PUTS THEM IN FRONT OF A JUDGE who can examine them in their entireity and assess their veracity.
And that we know she will not do willingly.
And that's why we'll hear no 911 call. That's why there'll be no contemporaneous police report. That's why she hasn't gone back to court to request the restraining order hearings proceed.
But no worries. Atchison will take care of that for her.
Blake, I have had enough of this. I will get her before a judge ASAP and deal with these lies she has been spreading about me.
It is breathtaking to see the sheer contempt this woman has for the legal system. She knows every dodge --- as a seasoned con artist would --- to keep herself from standing in front of a judge.
Oma, if whatever happened to you on that night was in any way criminal --- which would include, say, your live-in popping you one --- then the hospital is obligated to report this evidence to the police. I realize you have them on speed-dial, girlfriend, but them's the facts. Also, the "document" you posted is the single most pathetic forgery I have seen since the last time you posted one. I have to say, though, I haven't seen anyone but you using whiteout since, what? 1998?
And I know for a fact that Bishop Markell wants nothing to do with you. Ever hear the old adage, "Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me"? There must be a Russian equivalent.
Rearranging flights because the snow has us socked in.
Rebecca
RJ,
There is indeed a Russian equivalent, and in fact, it is exactly what Father said about SnoopOmaSand:
The English translation is: I have stepped on that rake twice already, I won't step on it again
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"I will first have to be notified of any hearing"
I think Atchison is aware of that and has no worry on that account.
You were properly served notices of the hearings in Austin that led to the bench warrant for your arrest.
And you were properly served with the notices to appear at Creditor Meetings in bankruptcy court -- notices which you blew off and consequently got your petition dismissed.
And you were properly served with notice of the sister state judgment in California, which has now been finalized against you.
And you were properly served with the Writ of Execution that is allowing Atchison to seize the $2,000 escrow account relating to your mortgage scam on O'Connor.
And you were properly served with notice of the Debtor Examination for April 2014, for which you will probably not appear and cause yet another bench warrant to be issued for your arrest.
And you are being properly served with the motion for attorney's fees and costs relating to your petition for a restraining order, which was dismissed for your failure to appear.
So I have no doubt Atchison will manage to get you properly served in his (not so) "future litigation".
This website performs a public service, Oma. It allows anyone who might be thinking of renting to you, purchasing something from you, having any business dealings with you whatsoever, to uncover your past. Granted, your past is an archeological dig that makes Schliemann's Troy look like a transparent dig, but still. Look at all of your grifts that have been uncovered and publicized on this forum. It's a tribute to your grim determination to never do an honest day's work in your life that there is so much of it out there to discover, but I should think a publicity hound like you would be pleased by the attention. So many people are talking about you, Oma. I admit they may not be saying things that you would like to hear, but still, bad publicity is still publicity.
And who knows what episode from your past will bubble to the surface like a dead body tomorrow?
RJ
Make sure that when you contest all of the services that you have had, you add your emoticons to the document, or even better, plan on making those idiotic faces in front of the judge. Nothing else has worked for you, but who knows?
Smiley face.
RJ
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"Now, I am going to get that money immediately out of escrow!"
Think again.
For starters, you have been served with the Writ. I know it's a long drive, especially in a pickup, but you need to check your mailbox in Glendale more often. You may even find some more interesting stuff there.
Secondly, the escrow account is in the name of Patrick O'Connor, and Titan cannot release the funds without his signature or a court order. As soon as a sheriff's deputy serves Titan with the Writ, O'Connor will authorize the release of the funds to Atchison.
Of course, the Woman Who Sued Herself would be confused about how all this works.
SnoopOmaSand wrote: I can file a Motion requesting this Writ be vacated on the grounds I need that money and giving that money to Mr. Atchison aka the Teflon Con, will cause me to suffer enormous hardships amongst other things,
Please oh Please oh PLEASE file that Motion! Pleeeeeezzzzzzeee?
When you DO, Bob's attorney is chomping at the bit and thrilled to be able to show the Judge that SnoopOmaSand drives a Mercedes Benz, goes skiing at Big Bear, goes to Vegas, San Jose, and wears $3,000 House of Irfe slacks to Court, not to mention ALL the attorneys it claims to have paid, and ALL in the last few months by its own WORDS! Yes, the Judge will want to see what "hardships" *snicker, chortle, guffaw* SnoopOmaSand will suffer, since it has made all of these claims, showing it has plenty of money. I'm sure the Court will be plenty upset that SnoopOmaSand would have to wear last season's House of Irfe and would agree that would be a terrible injustice and hardship.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAH
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"No, the escrow account is in both of our names and as of today's date, I have received nothing in the mail concerning any Writ of Execution"
Wrong again, bonehead.
First, your signature will not be required as there is a court-issued Writ of Execution allowing your assets to be seized without your permission.
Secondly, whether you received your mail is not important. You use a mail drop depot as your legal address in your filings with the court, and getting mail accepted by that facility is sufficient service on you of anything that may be served by mail -- as a Writ of Execution may be.
And thirdly, if you do file any motion relating to that Writ of Execution, you thereby admit notice of that writ, which moots the issue of whether or not "legal service" was made on you.
As for filing to get the sister state judgment lifted, that boat sailed 30 days after notice was first served on you. You blathered all over the internet that the instant Atchison filed for a sister state judgment, you were going to roar into court with all sorts of "proof" the California court would accept in overturning the judgment he has against you.
But what happened instead? Atchison filed. You huffed and puffed on the internet about getting the judgment reversed. But you filed nothing. And the deadline to file an objection passed.
As usual.
Wonderful. SnoopOmaSand is going to force Bob's lawyer to make her PROVE she "needs" the money: to pay for that Mercedes, to go surfing in Malibu, Horsie riding at the Equestrian Center, lunches in Beverly Hills, Weekends in Vegas, Sundays at Newport Beach dressed in Paris Couture and planning trips to Russia. Yes, quite a financially deprived lifestyle, I'm certain the Court will agree. Bob's lawyer will of course insist that every penny of her current financial status and her exact expenses will be disclosed to the Court to consider the question of "hardship".
Yep, THANKS SnoopOmaSand, Bob's lawyer is waiting. You have his address. Send it.
OH, I forgot to mention. When SnoopOmaSand does file all of those motions, Bob's lawyer will take its verbatim statements (all of which have been archived and saved) where it states it would "rather rot in hell than pay Bob Atchison his judgment" and then he will ask the court for all costs and attorney fees for having to deal with such frivolous and vexatious motions designed to do nothing but harass a legitimate creditor and attempt to forestall legal and legitimate collection on the judgment.
So file them all. PLEASE. The lawyer is waiting, you have his address.
In California, section 391 of the Code of Civil Procedure defines the qualifications of a vexatious litigant.
Under section 391, a vexatious litigant typically is a pro se plaintiff who has (1) lost at least five pro se lawsuits in the preceding seven years, (2) sued the same defendant for the same alleged wrong after losing, (3) repeatedly filed meritless papers, or (4) used frivolous tactical devices or already been declared a vexatious litigant for similar reasons. (Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 391(b); Wolfe, 486 F.3d at 1124.)
To be declared a vexatious litigant the person must be appearing in propria persona, or be referenced in the court filings as appearing in pro per or pro se.
The second scenario under section 391 involves attempts to relitigate issues after a prior case went against the plaintiff (§ 391(b)(2)). Unlike the first scenario, only a single prior adverse result is required. The subsequent case must be an attempt to relitigate the prior dispute against the same defendants: It must be another bite of the same apple—relitigation of the same, and already determined, cause of action, claim, controversy, or issue of fact or law.
Oma Hamou's pro-se Bill of Review was an attempt to re-litigate all issues which occured at trial, including the issue of "fraud" and "manufactured documents. Oma Hamou LOST.
The third scenario occurs when a pro per litigant repeatedly files non-meritorious motions, pleadings, or other court papers; conducts unnecessary discovery; or engages in tactics that are frivolous or solely intended to cause unnecessary delay (§ 391(b)(3)). In contrast to the first two scenarios, this one requires no prior adverse litigation at all; it is appropriate for claiming vexatious litigant status based entirely on conduct within the present lawsuit.
So File away SnoopOmaSand, file away. File ALL of those Motions. Today or tomorrow if you can.
Darlings, so excited! She's going legal again!
Omele, darling girl, is that wise? So far you have not come through a single court action the winner, and given the number of them that you have either instigated or been on the receiving end of, that has to be some kind of record even for California! And Texas, darling! If I were you (oy, I can't even imagine!), the fact that darling Rob and Bob are salivating to have you file something would make me a little nervous, darling! What does your darling boyfriend say about this, sweetness? Is he on board?
And you're up early, darling. But then a busy day pretending to be talking to lawyers and typing up your own darling motions must tire a girl out! But you can do it, darling! Take a little bump and get to it!
Posting because I care, darling. So much. So much!!!
Lovingly,
Mitzele
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"a Motion to Quash the civil bench warrant which was obtained during the course of my bankruptcy by Mr. Atchison is on its way to Texas"
She's been saying this for months. It must be taped to the back of a turtle.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"Having consulted with counsel this statement is false"
Must have been the same counsel who signed off on those fine pleadings Richman filed in federal court.
You know, the ones that got thrown out twice for inadequacy.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"The writ with respect to Titan Escrow was denied/rejected"
The writ was first rejected pending receipt of further information. That has been provided, the writ has been issued, and it has been mailed to your mail drop depot, which is the only notice to you the law requires for this writ. (That's one of the pitfalls -- for you, at least -- of using a mailbox address as your residence address when you file legal actions with the court.)
Apparently you are not aware how far the Los Angeles court system has fallen behind in updating its website since the court consolidations. Once it gets updated, you'll find the issuance of the writ as well as some other interesting things on it.
As for your incessant whining about Atchison "harassing" you with legal actions attempting to collect his judgment, you have apparently forgotten the closing lines of the original judgment against you. The judge who signed the order authorized Atchison to use "any process necessary" to collect the judgment.
That's what he's doing.
Don't like it? Tough cookies.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"I am not going to drive downtown Los Angeles to Hill Street."
Does the truck burn too much gas on long hauls?
The Writ of Execution was issued by the main courthouse pursuant to the Sister State Judgment which, per the new rules for filing venues under the court consolidation plan, was filed at the main courthouse downtown.
Looking in Burbank will do you no good, as there is no paperwork in Burbank. They won't be able to find anything more than you will until the Writ is entered into the court's electronic database.
And all this blather about whether you got your mail or not is pointless. If your "counsel" has, in fact, filed for an exemption, then you have waived service of the Writ.
I join Rob in hoping you did file for an exemption. It's a long wait until April for the debtor's exam to look into your finances.
It'll be interesting to see how you have filed two recent bankruptcies, have applied to the courts to waive fees due to indigence, and now claim losing $2,000 will be an undue hardship, while at the same time -- according to you, anyway -- you frequent the Burbank Equestrian Center, wear haute couture to court, dine in posh restaurants, visit Las Vegas, surf, shop at Bergdorf's, and drive a Mercedes.
Of course, we know that you're lying about all this posh living and that indigence is closer to the true state of your financial affairs.
But it's fun to watch you squirm over the heat of your own lies.
At 3:48 p.m. Hamou responded to my post about where the writ was filed:
"I know this and that is the court house [the Mosk Courthouse] which I contacted this afternoon"
She seems to have forgotten that at 1:40 p.m. she posted:
"I just checked with the Burbank Courthouse and there is nothing on file"
And that at 2:55 p.m. she posted:
"I went over to the courthouse and was told the same thing as I was told over the phone"
This was not the Mosk Courthouse, as she also posted that she did not go downtown to that courthouse.
Only after we tell her that the writ emanated from downtown, not Burbank, does she suddenly claim that it was the Mosk Courthouse downtown she had been checking all along.
It's clear Hamou is making up her story on the fly.
Regarding her bankruptcy, Hamou posted:
"a US Federal Judge ruled differently"
What the judge said was that there was no evidence that she had not disclosed assets, not because she had honestly represented them, but because she had failed to file any of the required schedules listing her assets in the first place.
What Hamou pretends was a victory before the judge was, in fact, his prelude to dismissing her petition for failure to comply with court ordered production of evidence.
YAY! The California Claim of Exemption of specific assets from Enforcement of Judgment REQUIRES a fully completed Financial Disclosure Statement, not to mention the specific statutory exemption and expressly why.
So, if SnoopOmaSand files the Claim of Exemption, then it will be required to disclose all finances, assets and expenses!
Hamou is over on Twitter boasting about her upcoming Enigma production on Nicholas II, yet she is on her "Ask Oma" forum claiming she has filed for a financial hardship exemption to duck a Writ of Execution.
Exactly how does a woman who can't get by without recovering $2,000 film a motion picture?
Of course, I guess it'll all be explained in the financial documents she will file in support of her request for the exemption.
But I suspect it'll still be interesting to see how she handles the cross-examination by Atchison's attorney in front of the judge.
Are you serious, Blake? She is NOW claiming on Twitter that she's making a movie on Nicholas II as Enigma Royal Films? How utterly bizarre.
How odd. Hamou actually posted Judge Robles' order in which he clearly stated:
"Atchison is free to pursue his state law rights against Debtor."
So that's two judges now -- five years apart -- who have told Bob Atchison that he is justified in going after Hamou for the judgment she owes him.
As for her bitching about this Mike Pyles' "harassing" Hamid Refai and his lawyer, it seems odd that a lawyer who was feeling "harassed" or felt his client was being "harassed" would not have done anything about it.
Oh, wait.
As I understand it, the lawyer did do something about it. He took Hamou to court and got a bench warrant issued for her arrest.
Boy, that's some odd response to harassment by Pyles.
The subsequent case must be an attempt to relitigate the prior dispute against the same defendants: It must be another bite of the same apple—relitigation of the same, and already determined, cause of action, claim, controversy, or issue of fact or law.
Oma Hamou's pro-se Bill of Review was an attempt to re-litigate all issues which occured at trial, including the issue of "fraud" and "manufactured documents. Oma Hamou LOST. Lost is LOST regardless of whatever the Judge's FINAL decision was based on.
Any attempt to bring up any issues of FACT OR LAW (like the claims of fraud and manufactured documents) from the original case is prima facia under this California law to be "vexatious litigation."
when a pro per litigant repeatedly files non-meritorious motions, pleadings, or other court papers; or engages in tactics that are frivolous or solely intended to cause unnecessary delay (§ 391(b)(3)) it is appropriate for claiming vexatious litigant status based entirely on conduct within the present lawsuit.
This will be directed to the Court's attention
by Oma Hamou on Wed Dec 11, 2013 9:20 am
I have ever right to say I am not going to pay a judgment against me that was obtained by fraud and perjury to name but a few, I have every right to file any motion in order to prevent a criminal from seizing my property based on the fact he committed a crime in obtaining that judgment,
Judge Roble and Judge Triana BOTH gave Bob Atchison the legal right and power to execute on his judgment.
Two Bankruptcies were filed and never followed up on simply to stop Bob from executing his Judgment.
A "Civil Restraining Order" was filed against Bob, and never followed up after dismissal, simply to stop Bob from executing his legal judgment.
Any further attempts to forestall Bob from legally executing on his judgment as granted to him by TWO COURTS, one State and One Federal, will be further evidence used to have SnoopOmaSand declared a VEXATIOUS LITIGANT, who will forever more need the Court's PERMISSION in advance from filing anything ever against Bob or to try to stop Bob's collection efforts, and if the Court allows it, a SUBSTANTIAL CASH BOND to cover Bob's costs to address it will be required by the Court before it can even be filed.
So, PLEASE PLEASE keep filing all of those promised Motions.
The more the better.
From: Mike Newson
To: The Sarskaia Foundation
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 2:02 PM
Subject: RE: WorldTravler
I have been talking to my friend and his wife, and she said:
Ok first off this guy is a classic scam artist. We have been involved with this type of leech before and he can be very easily destroyed. He is a nobody. I did a little sniffing around he has no pull anywhere. He is nothing more than a playground bully. A great snack for John. We could make a lot of things go very sour for this guy with all our connections at the UN and other places, but there would have to be the funds to support it. We have people in Texas..well you know...There is an old Italian saying " I could rain a shit storm down on you like you have never seen before" we tend to live by that. This would be a "fun" little project for us and oh by the way screw the lawyers this can be done with out them.
From: "Pastor"
Date: July 8, 2004 3:22:52 PM CDT
To: ,
Subject: Santa Monica Detective
Bob and Rob
This is John. I am ready to sign the affidavit concerning Oma. She needs to be stopped. She has now threatened me that she will only take down the shiton her website that she continues to post if I retract my statement to the Santa Monica Detective. What I please need from you is his name and number
again.
Bob and Rob, I really can't see any reason why you shouldn't proceed now with having Hamou declared a vexatious litigant.
Her abuse of court process easily meets the criteria set out in the California statute.
Rob, thanks for posting those two emails - that proves what was going on. I have always told the truth about the Hamou-Sproul murder plot.
Is Hamou stupid or what?
(Of course, we already know the answer to that.)
Those phone records she keeps trotting out show only Atchison's outgoing calls. They don't show any incoming calls.
They are therefore useless in demonstrating the pattern of contact between Atchison and Lupoli, as they would not show the calls from Lupoli to Atchison.
Is she too stupid to realize that (a real possibility), or does she know it and just hope readers are too stupid to realize it?
The Lupolis called me out of the blue - I had never heard of them nor knew them. How would I have known them - Hamou is just lying once more...
Look how deeply Newson was involved, look at what they wanted to do to me.
Lupoli told me Hamou and Sproul offered him $11 - 14,000 to travel to Austin and "make me go away" and hurt me which he knew was a murder request.
This came after the Newson email. wow, amazing stuff. I am glad Lupoli contaced me and exposed the plot.
SnoopOmaSand wrote:
I do not believe the court is going to legally declare me as being a vexatious litigant.
The attorneys (Yes mulitple ones)who have already started preparing the Vexatious Litigant Motions do believe it will happen.
So, once again, PLEASE file all those "briefs" (chortle, after all these years it still doesn't even grasp what legal "briefs" are and what they are used for. Well, what do you expect from something that can't even Judge ROBLES' name right. Robbles....hahahahhah, that was the nickname a co worker gave me fifteen years ago....LOL)
The more you file, the better.
Blake,
SnoopOmaSand is stupid. Very. Worse it tells all those lies because that is the only way it can feel important and feed its starving ego.
Blake - that's my last comment on the Lupoli affair. I am totally focused on collecting my judgment, the sanctions and penalties from Hamou.
The date of her debtor's exam is fast approaching. There is also the new filing and having Hamou declared a vexatious litigant.
Has that turtle arrived in Austin yet? No sign of him...
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"those records and others are now in the hands of the FBI"
Hands? Is that what they're calling the round file these days?
Oh, gag me with a spoon before I vomit over Hamou's continuing stupidity.
She posted:
"there is no record of any incoming calls from the alleged hit man 'Lupoli'"
Hamou posted the records from a single phone number. Lupoli worked for a church organization, which means he had a home number, an office number, and probably a cell phone number.
I call certain people exclusively from my cell phone number, because that is where their numbers are stored. And I call other people almost always from my office line because I'm usually at work when I call them. And I call some people from my land line at home because I either don't want to have conversations with them at work or because I want to be on my computer when I talk to them on a speakerphone.
Getting the records of just one of those phone numbers and trying to pass them off as "proof" of whom I had or had not contacted by phone would be absurd.
Of course, most of Hamou's "evidence" is absurd. That's why she can never get a judge or jury to buy any of it.
Wow, SnoopOmaSand is so incredibly dense, it admits including the laws and requirements that demonstrate to a T that it is a vexatious litigant!! Filing such a "brief" (which is an improper and meaningless document in this context) is itself evidence of vexatious!
Thanks for making the attorney's work easier!
Wow, whatever "lawyers" she has "consulting" with her are pretty incompetent. Well, since they are imaginary I guess that goes with the territory.
Well, it seems that Hamou finally checked her mailbox.
Typical SnoopOmaSand idiocy. Strike and Exculpatory are of no meaning in the context of Bob's Motion for his fees and costs for the failed restraining order, which was dismissed and NEVER followed up on. Frankly, it is clear SnoopOmaSand doesn't even understand the meaning of the words. What else is new?
Good news! SnoopOmaSand has acknowledged being served with Bob's Motion for Fees and Costs for her bogus Restraining order filing.
So SnoopOmaSandTweeted yesterday: "The film Lovely Bones parts of it remind me of my own childhood..."
What does this say about SnoopOmaSand? Lots. Here are excerpts from Roger Ebert's review of that film:
"The Lovely Bones" is a deplorable film with this message: If you're a 14-year-old girl who has been brutally raped and murdered by a serial killer, you have a lot to look forward to. You can get together in heaven with the other teenage victims of the same killer, and gaze down in benevolence upon your family members as they mourn you and realize what a wonderful person you were. Sure, you miss your friends, but your fellow fatalities come dancing to greet you in a meadow of wildflowers, and how cool is that?
This movie sells the philosophy that even evil things are God's will, and their victims are happier now.
Well, seems SnoopOmaSand has been playing the "rape" card for even longer than we thought.
I just enjoyed rereading the last lawsuit I filed for legal fees. It is comprehensive and absolutely convincing. I can't wait for the opportunity to be in front a judge to tell my story.
I will win this lawsuit just like I have won all the others. Very soon I will have another big judgment against Hamou-McConnell-Kennedy in California.
The calendar is counting down fast to her debtor's exam...
Quite right Bob. She will be forced to prove everything. She will be required to provide concrete proof of "Threats made on the telephone", concrete proof of her being in "hospital" on the first hearing, concrete proof why she threatened a contempt motion and only decided not to proceed the night prior, and concrete proof that she was in fact "beaten up" and especially concrete evidence the alleged beating was at Bob's request.
Thats a whole lot of concrete she will need to come up with. Enough to pave all the runways at LAX...
This is the not the only action I am taking to stop her lies - I've had enough. I will be pursing every legal avenue and option to end them once and for all.
Plus, I will be collecting my judgment, the penalties and the sanctions no matter how long it takes.
I see that Hamou has gone AWOL on her forum now that she has been served with the Motion that will put her to the proof of all the things she claimed in the petition for the Restraining Order and before the judge.
I guess she's in back-to-back meetings with her team of Mensa lawyers, her IT team, the FBI in Los Angeles and Houston, the Los Angeles Sheriff's Department, the Burbank and Glendale Police.
Oh, yes . . . and her crack legal advisor, Mr. Robert Richman.
I'm sure her Answer to the Motion will be well worth the wait.
Postby Oma Hamou on Wed Dec 11, 2013 1:40 pm
Regardless, I have filed a claim of exemption and notice will be sent to Bob Atchison's counsel of record here in California.
Documents on my behalf have now been filed and more will be filed before the close of business on Friday, 13th, 2013.
Postby Oma Hamou on Thu Dec 12, 2013 2:14 pm
What I have now done will bring Bob Atchison to court here in California in federal court
Wow the LA Superior and Federal Courts must really be swamped. A full week and nothing shows up as being filed anywhere.
Must have been filed by the same fictional attorneys as before.
Or SnoopOmaSand was lying.
Either way, Same Scheiße Different Day.
Christmas IS a busy time for con artists and scammers, preying upon the good nature of the Season and the gullibility of the lower class.
Hey has that turtle arrived in Austin yet...
My new lawsuit is not the only thing I am doing to stop the lies Hamou-Kennedy-McConnell has been spreading about me.
Now, I will have her in court (and we will order a complete transcript) and she will be compelled to admit to everything she has done to me - all the lies will be exposed - and it will be on the record for the world to see.
Also, I will soon have another judgment from her. As the judge ordered me to do I will use every means to collect my judgment from her and I will succeed.
Several interesting things are underway that will be revealed in the next few weeks.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"I have made my case and I am going to litigate it inside of a court room"
Right.
In Hamou's long series of dealings with courts, there is one thing that is consistent: she never prevails when the opposing party or opposing counsel is present and the matter proceeds to full evidentiary hearing.
She was able to get temporary restraining orders against two people based on her unilateral claims, but both lapsed when she disappeared once both opponents presented themselves as ready to proceed to a full hearing.
She got a restraining order against Patrick O'Connor only because he had left the state and did not appear to contest the order.
Other than the above, she has lost every one of the two dozen matters that have put her in front of courts.
She withdrew one bankruptcy petition and let a second one get dismissed for failure to comply with court orders as soon as she encountered opposition.
She failed to appear on October 23 once she found out Atchison had flown to California for the hearing (as he will for any future hearings).
She got a bench warrant issued against her in Texas for failures to appear in a legal matter she initiated.
She appeared in court in the Cowan unlawful detainer action and presented the court with forged evidence. As soon as Cowan and the court challenged the evidence, she beat a retreat and never returned to the courtroom.
She has lost more than a dozen cases relating to her scams for failure to appear.
She may file hare-brained pleadings, flaky motions, and forged service documents with a court. But one thing Hamou WILL NOT do is "litigate it inside of a court room" . . . at least as long as the opposition is present.
In fact, all Atchison has to do in order to prevail in any action involving her is to show up.
And he's soon going to demonstrate it further.
January 22, 2014 is the day of the hearing on the Motion for Costs for the bogus "civil restraining order". Just a month out now.
What lame and bogus excuse will SnoopOmaSand use this time? The Judge has gotten pretty tired of Jim Sproul showing up in shorts and tennies instead of SnoopOmaSand...
Yes there will be a hearing, in front of a judge, hopefully even the same judge who heard about "hospital" and Alleve....
I'm tempted to fly out just to watch the fun myself.
Great Xmas Present...
Looks like I'll be back in LA in a couple of weeks.
Just booked my flights.
More interesting news. It seems that in the last 24 hours or so, there has been a huge sudden burst of interest in people concerning "Alexandra McConnell" from all over Southern California and in fact much of the US.
google search terms include:
"Alexandra McConnell Animal Hoarder"
"Alexandra McConnell Animal Cruelty"
"McConnell Alexandra Palmdale Animal Cruelty charges"
Seems SnoopOmaSand might finally be betting the publicity it has craved for decades?
Poor SnoopOmaSand the dimwit.
It is called Google Analytics.
It records all organic key word searches that lead to a website.
Like the Google searches for "Alexandra McConnell Animal Cruelty" that came from Los Angeles.
It isn't "stalking" at all. Its a free service provided by Google to anyone!
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"This is WHAT will be proven in court in future litigation proceedings and I am eagerly looking forward to it!"
Well then, it's your lucky day now that the hearing on Bob's Motion has been moved up from June of next year to January 22.
In less than five weeks you can show a judge all your "evidence" that Bob threatened your life and then enlisted people to beat you in order to prevent your court appearance on October 23.
This should be fun.
And Rob, do remember that just a couple of months ago Hamou was in the hospital with a life-threatening infection.
Obviously she was going viral.
It will be a wonderful thing to have Hamou-Kennedy-McConnell in front of a judge in a few days. There will be lots of surprises in the courtroom. Many of her dearest wishes and hopes will be fulfilled.
Blake, SnoopOmaSand has no clue (well about anything actually, but specifically) how viral it now is.
One of the blogs, I won't say which, has had over 100 unique visitors using different networks, browsers, etc in just 36 hours. All related to search terms of "Alexandra McConnell Animal Hoarder Abuse" in various combinations.
Yes perhaps the "fame" is for real this time instead of in its head.
Here is one of the latest google search phrases, from someone in Los Angeles using Roadrunner:
"alexandra mcconnell facing animal cruelty charges in palmdale, ca"
A read of the filing will show I am represented by Jeff Lewis, again. He was at the last two hearings so he will also be an expert witness on the details.
I will always be represented by professional attorneys in the case. I am bringing in a specialist for the next legal action I am bringing.
The lies have not stopped - it's amazing - well, in a few weeks that will all be brought to an end in the various legal actions I am taking.
I'm guessing SnoopOmaSand's "pre empt" whatever that's supposed to be is filed in the same manner as the "Texas" and "Federal" things it said "had been filed" in the last weeks. Ie: filed in its head, not in an actual real Court.
If there is anyone reading this blog who wants to talk to my attorney here is his contact information:
Jeff Lewis
Attorney at Law
Law Offices of Christian Schank and Associates
4333 Orange Street, Suite 102
Riverside, CA 92501
tel: (951) 999-4200
fax:(951) 367-3223
Oh. SnoopOmaSand please please file as many things with courts as possible. The more you file and the sooner will cement the Vexatious litigant claims for Bob. Thanks!! 'Winky face'.
That's right Rob...
Hmmm. SnoopOmaSand must be even more delusional and irrational than usual.
Why in the world does it blather on about Bob filing things "in pro se"? He hasn't. Bob has attorneys handling everything.
Ward's office was too slow and made too many mistakes so Bob found a different law firm to handle the Judgment enforcement matters.
Of all the things SnoopOmaSand can rant on about (and usually does) this current rant about whether or not Bob filed anything "in pro se", he didn't, but really who gives a crap?
Nobody.
It matters not a whit. No does the day Jeff Lewis was retained, which SnoopOmaSand also got wrong.
But then again, who gives a crap?
Nobody.
SnoopOmaSand should really check up on the much more recent developments in Vexatious Litigant declaration in California.
under section 391 attempts to relitigate issues after a prior case went against the plaintiff (§ 391(b)(2)) are vexatuiys, Only a single prior adverse result is required. Which is SnoopOmaSand losing the lawsuit to Bob.
The Bill of Review qualifies ALONE as Vexatious, and IS on its own enough.
The subsequent case must be an attempt to relitigate the prior dispute.
ANY single filing which attempts to bring up "fraud" or "faked documents" or ANY SINGlE THING from that trial is vexatious per the statute.
Further, when a pro per litigant repeatedly files non-meritorious motions, pleadings, or other court papers; or engages in tactics that are frivolous or solely intended to cause unnecessary delay (§ 391(b)(3)) is further considered VEXATIOUS.
Thus, any single thing SnoopOmaSand files or does in any manner to impede or even DELAY Bob from enforcing his judgment in California, is vexatious under the law.
So, where is that "pre empt" whatever that is??
Where IS that Federal Court filing that "was filed"?
Were IS that California challenge that "was filed"?
We're waiting for it all, so it can be attached to the Motion to Declare a Vexatious Litigant!
SEND IT ALREADY!!
Read the list... she knows these phony filings were all lies. Why does she tell them?
Because she is a pathological liar.
Because she is also a grandiose narcissist.
She lies to make herself feel important. Hence the lies about legal teams of Mensa scholars, massive FBI investigations, cops and detectives just begging to testify on her behalf - imminent arrests of her victims, stalking by teams of men who rape her...
This is all a part of the imaginary narcissistic drama she has created from lie after lie after lie.
I believe nothing will stop her from lying. She is incapable of telling the truth, even about the smallest things. She will never admit to a single thing she has done, she feels no regret and incapable of empathy for the people she has harmed.
This next hearing is very important. Either she will no-show and I win; or she appears and I will get her before a judge where I can go through every one of these cases on my list and have the judge see exactly what she's been up to. It will all be on record, I will have it and I will use it.
She will not be able to try any of her tricks this time. I'll be there and Jeff will be there - we know what happened before. Wouldn't it be amazing if we got the same judge?
In any case I will win - with another judgment in California - I will have two to pursue collection on - however long it takes and regardless of the cost. I now have a second attorney working for me and other actions I am taking.
I will collect my judgment and the lies WILL stop from Hamou - Kennedy - Moran - McConnell aka whatever.
Case Number: ES017047
MS.OMA MCCONNELL VS REBERT D.ATCHISON, ET AL
Filing Date: 09/09/2013
Case Type: Civil Harassment (General Jurisdiction)
Status: Dismissed for Lack of Prosecution 10/23/2013
Future Hearings
01/29/2014 at 08:33 am in department B at 300 East Olive, Burbank, CA 91502
Motion For Attorney Fees(AND COSTS)
Well well well. I found the reason for the HUGE increase in blog traffic related to "Alexandra McConnell" and animal abuse/hoarding.
Heard, but have not yet confirmed, that Lancaster Animal Control raided SnoopOmaSand's house (still nowhere near Burbank) sometime around December 16 and that her animals have been confiscated and are being held there in Lancaster pending a Court Hearing.
Hope to get more details soon...
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"I have an attorney involved and the matter is going to be resolved in a good manner"
Normal people own animals without having bench warrants issued, without needing lawyers, without criminal convictions, without having animals put down repeatedly.
Yet with Oma Hama (aka Alexandra McConnell) owning animals always seems to come packaged with Animal Control visits, with rescue sites sending out alerts to their members about her, and with court dates.
This is not just a misunderstanding that will "be resolved in good manner". This is part of a pattern of animal abuse that is consistent with the psychosis known as animal hoarding in which a deranged "rescuer" collects animals compulsively without the means to house and care for them.
And no, Hamou, this is not a "private" matter. Causing the deaths of innumerable animals is and should be a matter of general public concern.
Thank God the word about you is spreading like wildfire in the animal rescue community.
Booking No.: 3805070
Last Name: MCCONNELL
First Name: ALEXANDRA
Arrest Date: 12/16/2013 Arrest Time: 1000 Arrest Agency: 1989 Agency Description: LACO-DISTRICT ATTORNEY
Date Booked: 12/16/2013 Time Booked: 1605
Actual Release Date: 12/17/2013 Release Time: 2117
Next Court Date: 01/07/2014 Next Court Time: 0830 Next Court Case: 3AV0072401
Court Name: M.D.ANTONOVICH ANTELOPE VLY CT
Court Address: 42011 4TH STREET WEST Court City: LANCASTERUPT
So, SnoopOmaSand was ARRESTED again on December 16, and spent another night IN JAIL, released on bond on the next day.
This is not just some "small misunderstanding" at all...
Well. SnoopOmaSand admitted to having a $50,000 bond! That means she faces felony charges. That's no misdemeanor level bond.
Wow, yet another arrest emerges. And now this afternoon brings a holiday cornucopia of bizarre quotes from Hamou:
"I spend close to $1,000 every month on animal food alone"
Well, won't it be interesting to see how the judge hearing your hardship plea about keeping the Titan escrow account out of Atchison's hands reacts to this?
"the psychiatrist report that states I do not fit the criteria of being a hoarder"
Hmmm. So there was a court-ordered psychiatric report, huh? Or did you just see a psychiatrist during one of your regular visits to the emergency room?
"I probably would have been release that same day but had to be rushed to the emergency room"
It's amazing how every legal pinch sends you racing to the emergency room.
But how were you "rushed to the emergency room" if you were in jail? You do say that is the reason you were not released, after all.
Nitwit.
How do I know its FELONY? Easy:
Here is the Misdemeanor Bond Amount Schedule for LA County:
http://www.lasuperiorcourt.org/criminal/pdf/misd.pdf
Here is the FELONY:
http://www.lasuperiorcourt.org/criminal/pdf/felony.pdf
ONLY the FELONY schedule lists $50,000. Which, by the way, per the schedule means the CHARGES carry up to NINE YEARS IN PRISON.
So, yeah, SnoopOmaSand faces serious FELONY charges. Again.
Oh, wait I minute. I just figured out what happened.
Animal Control had a lot to do that day besides delivering that public-service award to Hamou for the excellent care she gives her animals.
But in the pre-holiday rush of business, they got the paperwork mixed up and accidentally seized the animals from Hamou (aka Alexandra McConnell) instead of from the other person who had nearly a hundred animals in their filthy hole of a house.
I guess the judge who recently ordered her not to keep any animals is being just as ignored as the judges who ordered her to debtors exams, who ordered her to appear at show cause hearings, who ordered her to submit submit bankruptcy schedules, and who ordered her to pay sanctions.
The woman is severely mentally ill. If there were not so many victims -- both animal and human -- of her illness, she would be pitiable.
As it is, she's just despicable.
Wow, ANOTHER "medical emergency"? Did occur in in the police car? Were the handcuffs too tight? Was it an anxiety attack on the way to being booked?
I hope she'll be posting the medical report on this one.
I wonder if there were new mug shots and fingerprints taken.
SnoopOmaSand ought to read the public records before spewing insanity about yet more "emergency rooms"
The LASD ARREST RECORD is very detailed and clear.
"Alexandra McConnell" was arrested:
Arrest Date: 12/16/2013 Arrest Time: 1000
That means 10 in the MORNING on Monday December 16.
Alexandra McConnell was BOOKED:
Date Booked: 12/16/2013
Time Booked: 1605
That means booked at 4:05 PM. Monday afternoon.
THEN:
Permanent Housing Assigned Date: 12/17/2013
Assigned Time: 1555
Which means that at 3:55pm on TUESDAY Alexandra McConnell was assigned a permanent JAIL CELL.
Actual Release Date: 12/17/2013
Release Time: 2117
Which means released at 9:17 PM Tuesday.
Now, SnoopOmaSand bleated:
I probably would have been release that same day but had to be rushed to the emergency room once there the hospital wanted to keep me over night because of medical issues but I convinced the doctor to not do this
SO, since SnoopOmaSand SAID it didn't spend the night in the hospital, "Alexandra McConnell" was HELD IN JAIL THE NIGHT OF MONDAY 16TH THRU EVENING OF TUESDAY 17TH DECEMBER!
Busted the lies yet again with the public record.
So, anybody else notice that despite the daily assertions of criminal complaints, FBI investigations, the ONLY one arrested and incarcerated was,
drumroll.....
SnoopOmaSand.
Again. Twice just in the last year.
She's in big, big trouble. January 2014 is going to be a significant month for her.
I'll be winning my case. for sure.
True Bob. I wonder if the Women's Prison in Chino would send her down for the jan 29 Motion for fees and costs hearing? Do they do that??
Would she be cuffed and in an orange jumpsuit at my hearing?
Probably!
SnoopOmaSand bleated:
My cats are sick and this fact is a documented fact with Animal Control
Well DUH nitwit.
THAT was the reason YOU WERE ARRESTED on a FELONY Charge.
THAT was the reason your sagging 50 year old liposuctioned ass SAT IN A JAIL CELL for 36 hours.
THAT is the reason you will be standing in front of a JUDGE for the second time in less than a year for CRIMINAL ANIMAL ABUSE CHARGES.
Idiot.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"I have sent it to detective Munoz and to the FBI and others in law enforcement"
At this point, that makes about 72 file cabinets of papers she has sent to law enforcement.
I wonder how many members of law enforcement will show up to testify that what Animal Control will say about those animals and her living conditions is a lie.
To hear Hamou tell it, she is lied about by more people from more different walks of life than anyone else on earth.
We lie about her.
Her roommates lie about her.
Her business associates lie about her.
The people who sue her lie about her.
Lawyers lie about her.
Animal rescue people lie about her.
Landlords lie about her.
But, fortunately, law enforcement sees it all her way . . . which makes it a truly perplexing mystery why they keep slamming cell doors behind her.
Well, after her last conviction for animal abuse what were the terms of her probation? I'll bet the judge forbade her to own or have any animals in her care. Is she ignoring the judge and blowing off what she agreed to?
Almost 100 animals in squalid filth? It's sick, seriously so. She needs to be stopped before she kills more animals. She is a case-book animal hoarder.
As I have written before I believe she cannot stop herself - there will be more victims - human and animal. The only way to protect society and the poor animals is incarceration in an institution (where she can get the help she needs) or in prison.
Well, after her last conviction for animal abuse what were the terms of her probation? I'll bet the judge forbade her to own or have any animals in her care. Is she ignoring the judge and blowing off what she agreed to?
She has proven though her actions that she will disobey every judge and ignore any court order.
The only thing she will submit to is if she is caught and arrested or her assets are seized by court order.
That's what's happening now.
SnoopOmaSand bleated:
"Law Enforcement believed me..."
Really, so is THAT why you were ARRESTED, put in handcuffs and held at the Los Angeles County Sheriff's JAIL from ten in the morning December 16 until late in the evening December 17 when released on a Felony level bond of $50,000, and will be hauled in front of a Judge 8:30 am on January 7?
Yeah, law enforcement "believed you".
Until law enforcement saw the squalid conditions that nearly ONE HUNDRED sick, diseased poor animals were being kept in, by SnoopOmaSand, less than six months after conviction on animaal cruelty charges.
Funny, but during six months, the only person arrested, and arrested TWICE was SnoopOmaSand.
Not me. Not Bob, Not Blake. Not RJ or Mitzi.
Just SnoopOmaSand. Twice.
That's reality.
Will there be a response?
"Well, after her last conviction for animal abuse what were the terms of her probation? I'll bet the judge forbade her to own or have any animals in her care. Is she ignoring the judge and blowing off what she agreed to?"
We can make sure that all the things she has posted in her forum regarding the animals in her care, how animal control loves her, etc - is seen by the judge at her hearing in a few days.
Ah, it's Christmas Eve and the sounds of the seasons dance in my head.
Twas the night before Christmas
When all through the house
Not a kitty was stirring, they’re sick as a louse.
The laundry was tossed on the carpet threadbare.
Who cares about ironing when the cupboard’s so bare?
The doggies were nestled with filth in their beds
While visions of escape routes danced in their heads.
And Steve Lee in his ‘kerchief, and I in my bra
Had just rattled the walls with another brouha.
When out on in the yard there arose such a clatter
I sprang for the lock to keep out the natter.
Away to the ER I flew like a flash,
Tore open my bra and just asked for cash.
The lights on my breasts in the cold and bright room
Gave a vision of aging where no flowers bloom
When what to my near-sighted eyes did appear
But Animal Control who were standing so near.
With a little old warrant all folded and fit
I knew in a moment I was in deep shit.
More rapid than “fuck me” the wagon it came,
And they grabbed and shouted and called me by name:
Now Oma! Now Alix! Now Cathy and Jordan!
On, Becky! On Chedid! On Moran and Morton!
To the back of the car and to the cell hall!
Don’t run away, run away, run away y’all!
Merry Christmas, everyone! And pray for all the animals who are yet to fall into Hamou's clutches.
Merry Christmas to you too Blake, and RJ.
Pray also for the nearly 100 desperately sick and abused animals confiscated and now in the care of the Lancaster Animal Control Shelter, who have already fallen victim to SnoopOmaSand.
Pray they survive and can find truly loving and caring forever homes.
Pray those animals finally get justice.
That was VERY VERY funny, Blake!
I think we need to make sure the judge at Hamou - Kennedy - McConnell's hearing knows about the arrest warrants and all of the judge's orders she has ignored - even recently.
She has seen it and refuses to respond:
Was Alexandra McConnell ordered by the judge not to own, possess or house any animals as a part of her parole on her last conviction for animal abuse?
Did she sign anything agreeing to this?
How will the judge feel about her ignoring his orders and endangering animals again?
Merry Christmas to all! I am especially pleased to hear that the Butcher of Burbank has been stopped from harming more innocent animals, and look forward to listening to her try to talk her way out of this mess. As I said to you at dinner a week ago, Rob, it is long past time for her to be brought to justice.
The visit to Texas was lovely, as is your home. It was a particularly nice way to begin the holiday season for me; you and Bob are the definition of hospitality, Rob.
I'm leaving in a few minutes for my brother's in Connecticut, but just wanted to wish all of you a happy day tomorrow.
RJ
What is the deal with SnoopOmaSand, the Holidays and JAIL?
Not too long ago it sat in Jail over Thanksgiving with Bail set at a Million Dollars on Felony Forgery charges and it spent Christmas and New Years out on bail awaiting criminal trial.
It's Christmas again and SnoopOmaSand has spent more time in Jail and is out again spending Christmas and New Years out on $50,000 bail awaiting Criminal Trial!
Yes. Merry Christmas to one and all!
What a despicable disgusting and disingenuous response from the animal abuser SonoopOmaSand upon learning 96!precious animals had died from her abuse. Nothing but s "frowning face" emoticon. Yes it is a venal awful horrible animal killing monster without genuine care or feeling. We will ensure the a court knows how little concern this criminal had for these poor abused creatures.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"I learned my dogs and cats have been killed"
Why is it that a mass animal killing always seems to befall the animals that Hamou "rescues"?
She whined that all her cats were killed when she was arrested while squatting in Huiku Batchelor's house.
She whined that her dogs and cats were killed when Animal Control found the horde in O'Connor's house.
Now she's whining that almost a hundred animals in her care have been killed yet again.
She is a death sentence for any dog or cat that falls prey to her hoarding.
She is to animal rescue what she is to acting and film production: a delusional failure with a deep psychopathy.
The deaths of 96 innocent helpless animals is laid at the blame of SnoopOmaSand and no one else. It brought alll this upon them. The innocent creatures. Their senseless innocent lives should haunt SnoopOmaSand forever. It is forever responsible for what happened. Pray the Judge is made aware of this at its trial.
Lets look at exactly what SnoopOmaSand is now bleating...
First it bleats:
Every person who works at Animal Control in Lancaster, California are good people and I am grateful to that organization
On my knees, I humbly and respectfully, thank each and every member of the Lancaster Animal Control
Then bleated:
I was arrested and released the next day on a $50,000 bond because the animals confiscated are mine
Then after learning the animals had been killed, it reacts with only a frowny face emoticon. That's some real grief there...
Then it bleats:
My animals were executed simply because they were mine
my animals were put to death simply because they were mine
and:
The court order to seize my animals in the first place is specific and according to that order none of my animals were to be given away to any animal rescue groups and or put for adoption and or killed.
Hmmm. Seems SnoopOmaSand won't take responsibilty yet again.
No the fault ACCORDING TO SNOOPOMASAND is with Lancaster Animal Control. Those very same people who it got down on its knees to Thank and Praise.
I'm certain the good folks at Lancaster Animal Control will be most best pleased to hear SnoopOmaSand BLAMES THEM.
As usual.
I know the judge ordered Hamou-McConnell never to possess or shelter animals again after her last conviction for animal abuse. She signed an agreement with the court saying she understood the order of the court and would obey it. It was a part of her probation.
Within a few weeks Hamou-McConnell flagrantly and willfully violated this and started hoarding animals again.
I know the animals were living in appalling, indescribable filth with Hamou-McConnell. They were sick and dying - the raid by Animal Control was a emergency rescue operation to save them from Hamou-McConnell.
She is no friend to animals - as she claims - she doesn't rescue them - she kills them. Hamou-McConnell is an angel of death for cats and dogs - not their savior as she claims.
What she has written in her forum is so unbelievable - so perverse - it is actually disgusting. It is sick, very sick.
She knows the terms of her probation, she knows what the judge ordered her to do. As always, she ignored the court order. This is a very serious situation for Hamou-McConnell. When charges are filed this will be a felony.
I cannot see how she can slither out of this. It is too serious, too monstrous this time.
Once they find out about the other cases of animal abuse the court will understand that Hamou-McConnell will never obey any court order and the only way to protect animals - and humanity - from her is to separate her from society in a mental institution or jail.
A normal person would be hugely embarrassed and ashamed of what they had done, not Hamou-McConnell. She blazes away on her forum proudly reveling in the notoriety while crying crocodile tears for the animals who have died and suffered at her hands again.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"the fact that my animals were put to death simply because they were mine will haunt me for the rest of my life"
Yeah, right.
The fact that a horde of animals was put down when she was arrested in Huiku Batchelor's house did not haunt her enough to keep from starting a new hoard.
The fact that another horde of animals was put down when the conditions at Patrick O'Connor's house came to light did not haunt her enough to keep from starting a new hoard.
And this current haunting of her life will last no longer than it takes her to start hoarding a new collection of unfortunate animals who will then be killed -- if she can manage to stay out of jail for this.
Cheryl Poindexter called it exactly right. She tried to help Hamou get the animals at O'Connor's house placed -- not because she desired to help Hamou but because she was trying to save the animals. She said it was not the first time someone had to intervene, and she said it would not be the last, because Hamou was driven by mental illness, not by compassion.
Now, of course, Hamou will start spewing bile about Poindexter. But the simple fact is that Poindexter accurately foresaw months ago what is playing out right now.
Any animal that falls into Hamou's clutches is as good as dead.
And an increasing number of true animal advocates in the Los Angeles area are finding out about her mental illness and its consequences for animals.
At least we can be grateful for that this Christmas Day.
What a HOOT SnoopOmaSand turned out to be on Christmas Morning!
Best belly laughs I've had in ages!
The FBI is so devoted to SnoopOmaSand that the "Special Agent" devoted to prosecuting us CALLED HER PERSONALLY first thing Christmas Day to reassure SnoopOmaSand that his "investigation" was grinding on and on and on and on for years now. Wow, What SERVICE from the FBI! An agent working Christmas Day, so so concerned he calls SnoopOmaSand on the phone.
BWHAHAHAHAHA
and she continues to post how "terrible" Animal Control in Los Angeles is.
As my then attorney and I sat in the corridor the DA and the representative from Animal Control were locked inside the court room with the Judge still on the bench. What neither my attorney nor I knew was Animal Control had someone travel to my home in Burbank (we have her on videotape) to take additional photos and such.
What I didn’t know until then was animal rescue groups often snitched on one another to animal control and receives money for telling on one another so it is a 2 face operation.
Yes, those nice people at Lancaster Animal Control will be also pleased to read this public statement about their offices.
That should really go a long way in helping her case on January 7, when the DA brings these statements up in Court.
Can't wait.
Especially hysterical is the "no take backs" on pleading guilty to a crime.
Can't you just imagine the scene in that Courtroom, at least as SnoopOma tells it?
SnoopOmaSand: Your honor I wish to plead guilty.
The Court. Are you in fact pleading guilty and understand you are admitting your guilt?
SnoopOmaSand: Wait. No, No I'm not guilty. I demand a trial. Yeah, I demand a trial.
The Court: Very well, that is your legal right. We will adjourn for lunch and then proceed with your trial.
They break for lunch.
The Court: Sorry, there are no take backs. You said you wanted to plead guilty this morning. You can't take that back even though I said you could. I'm insisting you have to go with your first choice of pleading guilty. You can't take that back and get a trial. Tough noogies. You said you were guilty and that's good enough for me.
Hysterical. Seriously funny stuff.
the funniest part is SnoopOmaSand believes it.
Best Christmas day entertainment in ages.
So, Oma Alexandra Hamou - McConnell has admitted that everything I posted was true...
1. She was ordered by the judge not to own, possess or house any animals and she violated that order she signed in her last conviction for animal abuse. (There were 96!!!)
2. She was raided by Animal Control for dangerous and filthy conditions and immediately arrested. It was a emergency rescue operation by Animal Control.
3. Even more animals have died because of her abuse.
Can you believe that she has now started to attack the judge?
Can you believe she now claims Animal Control took a bribe and launched the raid at the instigation of the donor?
The Christmas day call of the nameless Houston FBI agent to comfort Oma was yet another pathological lie.
This is epic stuff - even for her.
Wow. Simply wow.
Hamou (who gets court fees waived by claiming indigence) spends $3,000 a month caring for animals.
An FBI agent in Houston called her on Christmas morning to give her assurances that he's hot on our trail.
The judge met ex parte with Animal Control during a criminal proceeding while she and her lawyer were locked out of the proceedings.
The crazier she gets . . . well, the crazier she gets.
One must ask the question.
Since SnoopOmaSand insists it was "paying people" to care for her animals, (1,000 or $3,000 monthly depending on which post you read...)
did those people have the required Kennel/Animal Boarding Facility LICENSES as required by Los Angeles County?
if not, why would a "responsible" person board NINETY SIX animals in an unlicensed facility?
If yes, then why were THEY not arrested and only SnoopOmaSand?
Simple, because SnoopOmsSand lives there and doesn't pay anybody anything. Remember just two months ago when it bleated to me:
You have money and I need money, lots of it, I'm coming after you and your money.
Remember it pleading poverty recently as well:
by Oma Hamou on Tue Dec 10, 2013 8:59 pm
I can file a Motion requesting this Writ be vacated on the grounds I need that money and giving that money to Mr. Atchison aka the Teflon Con, will cause me to suffer enormous hardships amongst other things
Well, which is it?? It can pay $3,000 a MONTH just for animal care, but not getting $2,000 would cause "enormous hardship"?
Yeah, it can't keep its stories straight.
The amusement continues.
OH by the way, did SnoopOmaSand's "attorneys" who received "$20,000" from her also inform her that Los Angeles County Laws require that when animals are impounded by the Animal Control Shelters, the owner of the animals is financially responsible for all food, boarding and veterinary care of each and every animal impounded, for every single day they have them."
So, SnoopOmaSand had better start sending some of the $3,000 to the Lancaster Animal Control Shelter. From what I have read, they can really use the money.
Also found this very interesting article about how LA County is cracking down very hard on animal hoarders in the Lancaster/Palmdale/Lake Los Angeles ares in the Antelope Valley...
http://articles.latimes.com/2013/jun/25/local/la-me-ln-vicious-dogs-antelope-valley--20130625
So now well-wishing neighbors are going to join the list of policemen, deputies, FBI agents, and lawyers who are all going to testify on Hamou's behalf "in future litigation".
Uh huh.
And don't you just love it? Bribe-taking Animal Control officers have joined the long list of people who are bent on destroying Hamou's life and reputation for no good reason whatsoever.
The Woman Who Sued Herself is now also in the running for the World's Most Unjustly Victimized Woman.
Meanwhile, dozens more animals who had the misfortune to cross her path are now dead.
Oma Hamou (aka Alexandra McConnell) is to animal rescue what Josef Mengele was to health care.
Darling Blakele, I'm not normally one who goes with the Mengele comparisons, but this time I think darling Omele is asking for it. And to publish this kvatch on the day of "Oh, Him's" birth, no less. Seriously, Omelein, your nose is going to fall off, sweetness.
Which of course is nothing compared to what you did to this latest batch of poor animals, darling. Again, darling, not for anything, but you have already done a number on poor Imperial, and now you're taking out a massive amount of helpless beasts? What gives? Can't you hoard tin foil and string like a normal crazy person?
So darling boychiks, a long phone call with darling Rivka where she couldn't say enough about your home and hospitality. Bitsy and I are jealous, darlings, and plan on a trip to Austin in the spring.
Alright, sweethearts, I know you are probably having your Feast of Oh, Him meals right now, so I'll sign off. And darling Omele, I hope the buffet at Sweet Tomatoes was extra-good this Himtide! Or was it Yuletide Scramble at Denny's? Darling, whichever, have a happy holiday!
Posting with Yuletide love, darling. Yuletide love!
Mitzi
Darling Omele, who peed in your eggnog, darling? Because you seem like you're having a bad Noel, sweetheart. Of course it isn't as bad as the poor animals whose death you caused, but then, animals can't try to lie their way out of everything, unlike someone we know (that someone is you, darling, because I don't want to be a tease!). And darling, we all look forward to seeing you in court clutching receipts for thousands of dollars worth of animal medicines and foods. We also look forward to the coming of the Messiah, darling (some of us aren't convinced that today was the day, if you know what I mean, and I think you do, darling! I think you do!) But we aren't holding our breath.
And darling, I don't know darling Cheryl Poindexter, but I do know what a libel law is, darling. Really, sweetheart? You want another lawsuit coming your way in the New Year?
Oh, darling. Really?
Mitzi
Yeah, that's a good plan. Lets see,
you're out on $50,000 bond facing criminal charges, so what is the really smart thing to do?
Accusing Los Angeles County Animal Control, for crimes, conspiracy, theft, bribery...
Accuse the Los Angeles Superior Court Judge of violating the US Constitution and his oath of office by refusing a defendants request to stand trial and force a guilty plea.
Bragging about how much money you're been spending, just weeks after swearing to a Court of Law you had to be relieved of paying Court fees for reasons of poverty.
Yeah, I'd say this is really a smart plan.
So Hamou is now exchanging posts with herself about Nathan Winograd's "no kill" movement for animal rescue.
Frankly, it's moot. With animal "rescuers" such as Hamou where filth and disease run rampant, who needs kill centers, anyway?
we uns had a blue chrismas with out you lil bit. theres a lamp burning in the window of the
2xwide for ya whenever u get thru this cat mess again.
Look at what we found:
http://omahamoureport.org/OmaArrestedPress1213.jpg
Post a Comment