When one uses a search engine online using my name, and my trade name, The Austin Wine Guy, one finds a deluge of defamatory and simply out right lies spread across the Internet results now going back several years all from her hand.
I would NOT even have written here, had this person not continually written her own false and defamatory statements herself and aided and abetted other personae writing "on her behalf" for the last six years. If she doesn't want me to say anything about her, she ought not have been continually blogging and writing about me much less aiding and encouraging others to do so as well.
The woman behind all of this uses alias names: Oma Hamou, Oma McConnell, Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Hamou, Alexandra Moran, Oma Demian, Alexandra Murphy, are the usual ones, but there are others. She used the name "Oma Kennedy" to obtain money from a woman who was approached to adopt her child (she only took her child back, on literally the last possible day, after the adoptive mother refused to continue to pay her any more money.) She uses a business name of "Enigma Royal Films, LLC" she also calls just "Enigma Films" and "Reseda Glass" and "Worldwide Construction Enterprises, Inc." I learned about her genuine background, and she wants me silenced from speaking about it.
This woman admits that her actions are all motivated by her bitterness and hatred towards me, and this is the reason for her actions.
This woman, Oma Hamou, Oma McConnell, Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Hamou, Oma Demian, Alexandra Murphy and her other aliases have a twenty plus year track record of FELONY CONVICTIONS, multiple arrests, failure to abide by the requirements of her probation for her felony convictions which lead to more arrests, many many civil judgments against her for hundreds of thousands of dollars, a history of writing bad checks, and she was arrested late in 2008 in San Bernardino California on a Felony Charge of Forgery of a Financial Instrument (she seems to have forged a large check) After 14 months of dragging the process out, she paid the Victim full restitution and the District Attorney dropped the Felony charge. She has a history of evictions and bad checks.
A complete dossier has been posted, with the details on her activities, notably passing bad checks, stiffing landlords for rent owed and trashing the houses she rents by reason of keeping literally dozens of cats and dogs and not cleaning up after them. Not to mention numerous unpaid judgments against her.
That blog is here.
Oma Hamou using the ALIAS NAME OF Alexandra Louise McConnell was ARRESTED BY THE BURBANK POLICE DEPARTMENT ON FRIDAY MARCH 8, 2013 ON A FELONY CRIMINAL WARRANT FOR FAILURE TO APPEAR IN COURT ON ANIMAL ABUSE CHARGES THAT WERE FILED AGAINST HER ON JANUARY 29, 2013 IN PALMDALE.
SHE WAS HELD FROM 1130 AM UNTIL 4:15pm and released on bail.
Case number ATP3AV007224-01
SHE WAS CONVICTED ON THIS ANIMAL ABUSE CHARGE (PENAL CODE 597(B) JULY 30, 2013
She was given 36 months conditional probation by Judge Harmon. She was required, among other things, to enroll in 24 Animal Neglect classes and provide the Court proof she had enrolled within thirty days. She was also prohibited from possessing ANY animals at all for three full years.
"Alexandra McConnell" failed to provide the proof of enrollment and failed to appear as ordered by Judge Harmon. The Court immediately revoked her Probation and summarily issued a $50,000 bail arrest warrant in October 2013.
In responding to complaints of animal neglect, abuse and overcrowded conditons in a Lancaster California residence, "Alexandra McConnell" was arrested AGAIN on December 16, 2013 by the responding officers when they discovered the outstanding arrest warrant, and 96 sick, filthy and neglected animals found living in the most deplorable of conditions were confiscated from her Lancaster California residence by the Lancaster Animal Control Shelter. Having these animals violated the Court Order. Oma Hamou aka Alexandra McConnell, Booking No.: 3805070 was held in custody for 36 hours before being released on a $50,000 bond. Charges are pending and a hearing on this Case, number 3AV0072401 is scheduled on the matter for January 7, 2014 in the Antelope Valley Courthouse.
http://omahamoureport.org/OmaArrestedPress1213.jpg
This woman also has a default Judgment against her in Los Angeles County, in the amount of $55,000 which is admitted under oath was owing in her Bankruptcy Petition:
Case Number: MC020860 HAMID REFAI VS ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL, JIM SPROUL, ET AL
Filing Date: 09/23/2009
According to the case, Mr. Refai, a married man, was "involved" with Alexandra McConnell, she kept telling him about serious "medical problems" and asking for "loans" for medical bills in the total amount of $51,000. This was confirmed by the fact that a woman who used to live in her house wrote on the internet THREE MONTHS before the suit was filed: "I lived with this lady, she is no good. SHE LIES. SHE HAS LIKE 50 CATS LIVING WITH HER AND HER HOUSE SMELLS LIKE SHIT AND CAT SPRAY AND PISS. She is dirty, filthy and uses old men for money I SEEN IT MYSELF. By the way Hamid's wife knows it was LIPOSUCTION you drained their bank account for, not cancer in your asshole. He had her sign a promissory note, co signed by long time co-conspirator Jim Sproul. She of course never PAID back the money. She, of course, never showed up in Court.
Here is the Final Judgment against Alexandra McConnell aka Oma Hamou and her "longtime friend" Jim Sproul:
Mr. Refai is pressing the collection of this Judgment and ordered a Debtor's Exam of Hamou aka Alexandra McConnell. On February 5, 2013, Hamou aka McConnell failed to appear at a Court Ordered Debtor Exam and The Hon. Judge Yep of the Los Angeles County Superior Court issued a Bench Warrant for her ARREST and ordered a $10,000 bond must be posted by Hamou aka McConnell to compel her appearance.
OMA HAMOU AKA ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL SCAMS:
The following have agreed to speak with law enforcement or potential landlords about their experiences and the Felony Forgery charge against this woman, in the hopes that others will not fall prey to her in the future.
2008. SHARLANE CHIPI. Represented by Attorney LAURENCE H. LISHNER filed Unlawful Detainer (EVICTION) against her tenant Oma McConnell Case Number: 08U03169
CHIPI, CHARLANE (sic)VS. MCCONNELL, OMA
Sharlane Cecilia Chipi. She lives in Torrance, and her phone number is available upon request.
In 2008 Ms. Chipi was seeking a short sale of her home. A realtor named Kevin Davies (phone available upon request) introduced Oma McConnell to Ms. Chipi, claiming she had loan approval to purchase the house but that McConnell wanted to move in as a renter prior to closing the sale. (This was exactly the scenario she used to gain occupancy at Mr. O'Connor's house in Littlerock.) Ms. Chipi agreed.
The first rental check was written on a closed account. No further rental payments were made. McConnell moved in with her son and another man. The house was thoroughly trashed. Numerous animals were kept in one room which was badly damaged. Carpeting was ripped out. Appliances were removed. The kitchen caught fire.
Ms. Chipi sought help from the Sheriff's department which told her that they could do nothing without an eviction order. Ms. Chipi filed a U.D. (Case No. 08U03169 - Michael Antonovich Antelope Valley Courthouse), which she later dropped due to lack of resources. She said that Kevin Davies also filed an action against McConnell and that she failed to show for the hearing.
Ms. Chipi says she has some files on the incident, as does Mr. Davies, and that she also has undeveloped film of the damage done to the house.
Robert Atchison
Won a Civil Judgment against Oma Hamou for her failure to pay him consulting fees as she promised him she would do.
A District Court Judge has signed an order requiring her to schedule and appear at a deposition in Austin Texas no later than September 3, 2011 to disclose her assets, finances, and employment information, and she is further ORDERED to comply by providing the requested financial, employment and asset documentation to Mr. Atchison no later than August 20. She did nothing. Her failure to do these things resulted in an order of Contempt of Court.
August 2011: Hamou/McConnell tried to derail Mr. Atchison's debt collection with a last moment filing of a "Bill of Review". Hamou's Bill of Review was dismissed on July 26, 2011 by the Hon Judge Cooper of the District Court. Hamou now has no choice but to comply with the Court order.
OCTOBER 18:
The Court slapped Oma Hamou with an Order of Contempt of Court and imposed $1,000 sanctions against her for failing to comply with the Ordered Document Production and Deposition.
January 2012: District Court Lora Livingston Slapped an ORDER TO APPEAR AND SHOW CAUSE on Oma Hamou requiring her to appear in Person to explain her continuing violation of Court Orders. Her failure to appear will most likely result in a Bench Warrant for her Arrest:
Hamou failed to appear as ordered by the Court. As a result, a BENCH WARRANT for her arrest was issued on March 26, 2012 by the same Judge Livingston in the Travis County District Court
Hamou attempted in June 2012 to ask the Court to vacate the Bench Warrant, but it seems her "Paralegal" one Robert Richman (a Tai Chi master and Torah Scholar, as well as "Paralegal") seems to have chickened out on continuing.
In 2012 "Oma McConnell" filed for Bankruptcy in order to forestall debtor's exams and collection efforts. She failed to file any required schedules or information, despite Court orders to do so. Her Bankruptcy was dismissed for that failure. However, On August 20, 2012 Judge Robles of the US Federal Bankruptcy Court ordered her Bankruptcy proceedings to be re-instated and ordered her to comply with Document Production requests and Deposition by attorneys for Bob Atchison, which are now scheduled for late September. Hamou/McConnell FAILED TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT ORDERED DOCUMENT PRODUCTION REQUIRED NO LATER THAN SEPTEMBER 14, 2012. She further FAILED TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT ORDER THAT SHE APPEAR FOR A DEPOSITION ON SEPTEMBER 20, 2012. She can now be held in Contempt of Court.
October 31, 2012, the Bankruptcy Court dismissed Oma McConnell's bankruptcy due to her utter failure to file even one single required schedule or document. Judge Ernesto Robles said her creditors "are free to pursue their State claims against her".
March 2013: Mr. Atchison has had his Judgment made final in California and localized to California and is proceeding to collect against her. A Debtors Exam (ORAP) has now been issued and ordered by the Los Angeles Superior Court for Hamou/McConnell to appear in Court.
January 29, 2014: A Los Angeles Superior Court Judge awarded Mr. Atchison $2,800 in costs against "Oma McConnell" for her filing a false Civil Restraining Order against him to attempt to stop his lawful Judgment Collection Efforts.
Eric Cowan
Landlord in 2010. Bad checks and trashed house. Rented from him as "Alexandra McConnell" but presented an expired California Driver's License in the name of Oma Hamou.
661-947-2079
Thomas Ward
Attorney for Hamid Refai (victim of a scam who loaned Alexandra McConnell $50,000, for "cancer treatments" actually used by Alexandra McConnellto pay the Victim Restitution in the Felony Forgery case in Victorville, never repaid). Los Angeles Superior Court Case Number: MC020860 HAMID REFAI VS ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL, ET AL
Mr. Ward's telephone number for details: 661-948-5021
Bryan Stodghill
Prosecutor in Victorville,San Bernardino County Felony Forgery Case where Alexandra McConnell wrote a check in 2009 on a closed account to the landlord, and in his words "She basically destroyed the house." He states that he would have taken her to trial on the charge had she not paid full Victim Restitution to the Landlord for the bad check and damages to the house.
760-243-8600
Patrick J. O'Connor
Homeowner in Littlerock California who was selling his house using the services of Shari Porter agent with Big Valley Realty in Palmdale California. Shari Porter brought "Alexandra Moran" using an expired drivers license in the name of Oma Hamou to Mr. O'Connor as a "Qualified Buyer" of his home. Shari Porter insisted Oma Hamou be allowed to rent part of the home as a room mate of Mr. O'Connor until the sale closed. Porter kept informing Mr. O'Connor that Hamou was pre-qualified by lenders, yet never actually provided the required documentation proving this to O'Connor. Shari Porter told O'Connor that Hamou had deposited funds into escrow at Titan Escrow in Palmdale, but again refused to give O'Connor any actual escrow documents. Hamou delayed closing for a full five months, then refused to close when O'Connor demanded. She further refused to leave the property and squatted in the residence with four men, another woman and four or five children and literally ten or twelve dogs and forty to fifty cats. She has moved an old trailer and cargo boxes onto the property as well. She has squatted on Mr. O'Connor's property for over 18 months without paying rent. This sadly forced Mr. O'Connor to lose his property to Foreclosure and Declare Bankruptcy, as direct results of this woman's scams and lies.
pjoinak@yahoo.com (I also have Mr. O'Connor's cell phone number should anyone wish to speak with him directly)
She uses 145 South Glenoaks Burbank, CA as her "legal address". However this address is actually FEDEX Burbank and is nothing more than a mail drop.
OMA HAMOU/AKA OMA MCCONNELL, ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL, ALEXANDRA MORAN EVICTION HISTORY:
Filing Date: 09/22/2008. CHIPI CHARLANE. Represented by Attorney LAURENCE H. LISHNER filed Unlawful Detainer (EVICTION) against her tenant Oma McConnell Case Number: 08U03169
CHIPI, CHARLANE VS. MCCONNELL, OMA
2009 Alexandra McConnell wrote a check in 2009 on a closed account to the landlord Huiku Batchelor. Felony Fraud charges pressed and Hamou aka McConnell evicted after being incarcerated in jail. In the proscuter's words: in his words "She basically destroyed the house."
2010: "Alexandra McConnell" rented from Eric Cowan, but presented an expired California Driver's License in the name of Oma Hamou. Hamou/McConnell gave Cowan bad checks for rent and Cowan filed unlawful detainer/eviction and got her out of his house. Cowan, Eric vs. Hamou, Oma (Michael Antonovich Antelope Valley Courthouse, Case No. 10U01290). Erik Cowan will confirm 661-947-2079
2011 "Alexandra Moran" rented a room from Patrick J. O'Connor, but presented an expired California Drivers License in the name of Oma Hamou. She then claimed to want to purchase the property. She delayed the purchase for FIVE MONTHS with numerous stories, and is now squatting on the property without permission nor paying rent . She lives there with her son, Nicholas Royal Moran, who has severe psychiatric disorders (his is currently under Conservatorship pursuant to the California Lanterman Petris Short Act) and has a history of violence, both domestic and with police. Mr. O'Connor himself witnessed Nicholas Moran beat his mother in front of him in the residence. She also lives with one Steve Fred Lee, who has over 15 criminal convictions for eluding police, indecent exposure and habitual driving with a revoked drivers license. Another squatter on the property is one Michael McBride who lives with four or five of his children also on the property. Hamou also has literally many dozens of cats and more than 10 dogs on the property. Hamou attempted to keep Mr. O'Connor from evicting her by filing a Restraining Order against Mr. O'Connor alleging he made threats of violence against her and her son. However, she did NOT file this order until a full TWO WEEKS after Mr. O'Connor left the residence and moved to Alaska! Hearing on the requested Restraining order was held Friday July 15. Hamou first requested a continuance! The Judge refused to delay the hearing. After the Judge examined her criminal record, arrest record and history of evictions and Judgments, the Judge in so many words called Hamou "a Criminal and Con Artist" recognized her string of VICTIMS and refused to grant the restraining order, and further told Hamou that while he could not order her out at the moment, she did have to leave O'Connor's property and pay him the rent owed. Hamou told O'Connor by email she will be out by September 1. Mr. O'Connor's attorney has begun Eviction Proceedings against Hamou McConnell and her other squatters. While Hamou wrote Mr. O'Connor that she would be "out of the house by September 1" she has hired a lawyer to delay the eviction proceedings. Reports indicate that the house is trashed, with old furniture in the yard, many old rusted trucks, tires, boxes and piles of trash are strewn across the property.
A Health Department Complaint about the property was filed on February 16, 2012 by the neighbors to this property complaining of "Accumulation of refuse and cast off materials" and "Accumulation of Animal Excrement" which Hamou has allowed on the property.
A Health Department Complaint about the property she currently squats in without paying rent was filed on February 16, 2012 by the neighbors to this property complaining of "Accumulation of refuse and cast off materials" and "Accumulation of Animal Excrement" which Hamou has allowed on the property.
This file also documents her use of various alias names. She was "Oma Moran" in the report filed July 12, 2011
A cable company employee called in a complaint of more than 20 dogs and 20 cats, many of them clearly ill, housed in filthy conditions on December 19. 2011
On February 29, 2012, when Animal Control went to inspect the property, she was suddenly "Alexandra Oma Louise Hamou McConnell" in a report that found filthy foul living conditions and found FORTY ONE DOGS and well over THIRTY CATS on the premises:
The City went BACK, but she still had not cleaned up the place. On March 7, 2012, the County of Los Angeles Department of Health Services issued her a CITATION FOR HEALTH CODE VIOLATIONS No. 300055 for accumulation of trash, debris and animal droppings on the property.
Some FIVE FULL MONTHS were allowed to her to comply with these orders. Animal Control went BACK on August 1, 2012 and found she still had TEN dogs and 20 cats, 3 of which were still sick:
Numerous Animal Cruelty charges were filed against her January 29, 2012 in Palmdale.
Oma Hamou using the ALIAS NAME OF Alexandra Louise McConnell was ARRESTED BY THE BURBANK POLICE DEPARTMENT ON FRIDAY MARCH 8, 2013 ON A FELONY WARRANT BASED ON THE CRIMINAL CHARGES THAT WERE FILED AGAINST HER ON JANUARY 29, 2013 IN PALMDALE. SHE WAS CONVICTED OF ANIMAL ABUSE (CAL. PENAL CODE SECTION 507(B) ON JULY 30, 2013
These photos of the property confirm these reports:
On March 7, 2012, the County of Los Angeles Department of Health Services issued her a CITATION FOR HEALTH CODE VIOLATIONS No. 300055 for accumulation of trash, debris and animal droppings on the property.
Mr. O'Connor filed an Unlawful Detainer Action in Los Angeles Superior Court, Case 11U2065 to evict Hamou.
She uses badly photoshopped images of herself to attempt to make people believe her lies. Here are three images she has used at various times over the last fifteen years, the small image is her current twitter photo, despite her now being fifty years old! You can see for yourself the face is the same exact image, used first in the late 1990s, then again in 2003, and today!
She also has a history of
failing to pay her attorneys. The following law firms have judgments
against her and/or are owed money by this woman:Freeman Freeman & Smiley in Los Angeles $10,000
Westar Legal Services in Los Angeles, $10,000
Foster Malish LLC in Austin Texas $20,000
Suzanne Curtis in Los Angeles $1,000
2011 "Alexandra Moran" rented a room from Patrick J. O'Connor, but presented an expired California Drivers License in the name of Oma Hamou. She then claimed to want to purchase the property. She delayed the purchase for FIVE MONTHS with numerous stories, and is now squatting on the property without permission nor paying rent Mr. O'Connor has retained an attorney and legal action is pending for yet ANOTHER EVICTION. Patrick J. O'Connor will confirm. pjoinak@yahoo.com
NEW INFORMATION IN THIS MATTER JUNE 25, 2011:
Published on the web by Oma Hamou herself:
From: sarskaia@aol.com
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:18:25 -0400 (EDT)
To:
Subject: Re: The Motorcycle
Mr. O'Connor,
I will not be arrested for the motorcycle as you left it here because I was going to buy it. If you no longer want to sell it to me, I have no problems giving it to Ralph. He must contact me and arrange a time and the day with me so that we can coordinate our schedules. He or no other friend of yours can just show up and expect to gain access.
She admits here that she doesn't OWN the motorcycle and admits Mr. O'Connor wants his bike BACK.
So what does "Alexandra McConnell" aka Oma Hamou aka Alexandra Moran do??
She SELLS THE MOTORCYCLE to one "Craig" for $4,500!!
"Craig" gets suspicious because "Alexandra" can't produce the title (which of course Mr. O'Connor still had) and would only give him a handwritten bill of sale (a copy of which I have in my possession now). The Los Angeles County Sheriffs were involved YET AGAIN with her and her various names to safely return the motorcycle to Mr. O'Connor!
Selling property that she admits isn't HERS to sell legally! Isn't that "grand theft"??
Also, taking money for property you do not own nor have title to by claiming it is yours to sell is "THEFT BY DECEPTION" a felony crime for which she has been convicted three times in the past.
Someone else has recently posted a precis of the criminal and debt history of this woman. You can go here to read the specific details for yourself:
http://www.omahamoureality.blogspot.com
I have put up a precis of the specific information for her victims and law enforcement here: http://OmaHamouVictims.blogspot.com
You are encouraged to share information you may have about her and her activities with me.
OMA HAMOU AKA ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL BAD CHECK HISTORY:
07/22/2010 `NSF` CHECK WRITTEN BY OMA HAMOU WAS RECEIVED BY THE LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT FOR FILING FEES AND MOTION FEE , (HAMOU, OMA) AKA(MCCONNELL, ALEXANDRA) AKA (DEMIAN, OME) AKA (ASHKENAZY, OMA) AKA (HAMOU, ALEXANDRA) AKA(CHEDID, OMA) AKA (JORDAN, REBECCA) AKA (TAYLOR, JORDAN) AKA (ABRAMOV, OMA) NOTIFIED BY MAIL PER SECTION C.C.P. 411.20. PAYMENT DUE BY 08/16/10 , IN THE SUM OF $ 310.00 . Proof is here in the case record: Cowan, Eric vs. Hamou, Oma (Michael Antonovich Antelope Valley Courthouse, Case No. 10U01290)
EARLY 2010 ERIK COWAN RECEIVED SEVERAL CHECKS FROM ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL/OMA HAMOU FOR RENT DUE ON PROPERTY HE OWNED. CHECKS WHERE BOTH NSF AND ON A CLOSED FLORIDA ACCOUNT BELONGING TO RESEDA SCREEN & GLASS. OMA HAMOU IS EVICTED FROM THE PROPERTY AS A RESULT. Cowan, Eric vs. Hamou, Oma (Michael Antonovich Antelope Valley Courthouse, Case No. 10U01290). Erik Cowan will confirm 661-947-2079
OCTOBER 2008 MRS. HUIKU BATCHELOR IS WRITTEN A CHECK FOR RENT BY ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL ON A CLOSED ACCOUNT IN THE NAME OF OMA HAMOU. THIS CHECK IS PROSECUTED AS FELONY FORGERY BY THE SAN BERNARDINO DISTRICT ATTORNEY. Case No. FVI802540 . District Attorney Bryan Stodghill will confirm. 760-243-8600
2004 OMA HAMOU ISSUES CHECKS ON A CLOSED ACCOUNT TO THE FOLLOWING PERSONS IN IRVINE CALIFORNIA:
ONE TO MONIQUE HAHN,
ONE TO WILD WEST MEDIA (17522 Von Karman Ave. Irvine, CA. 92614) ,
ONE TO RICH SCHAEFER.
-Police investigation into these bad checks was opened by the Irvine Police Department.
June 25, 1991 – Oma Demian (NOW OMA HAMOU) is arrested in the State of Utah for NSF Check November 7,1991 "Oma McConnell" (aka Oma Demian) was convicted in the State of Utah, Park City District Court, Utah Administrative Office of the Courts case number 2218-911613381, of the 2nd degree Felony crime of "Theft By Deception" in violation of Utah Criminal Statue 76-6-405, and a disposition of "Guilty" has been entered in that Court for this crime.
NSF CHECKS IN THIS CASE WERE WRITTEN TO
JUPITER PROPERTY MANAGEMENT/DIANE APT $5,000
FIRST SECURITY BANK $4,500
NSF Checks written by Oma Demian (now Hamou) in Wyoming to:
KMart, 12/14/90 $437.95
United Airlines 12/17/90 $3,456.00
JANUARY 24, 1992 OMA DEMIAN (NOW OMA HAMOU) CONVICTED IN YELLOWSTONE COUNTY MONTANA FOR FELONY OF ISSUING A BAD CHECK COMMON SCHEME, SENTENCED TO TEN YEARS PROBATION.
April 1, 1992: Oma Demian NOW OMA HAMOU AKA ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL convicted of the Felony offense of Issuing a bad check over $150 was sentenced to 120 months in Prison, sentence suspended. Case 91-103, in Billings,Yellowstone County Montana, for the fraudulent checks issued in 1991.
She is truly psychotic in her daily compulsion because I stumbled onto these actual facts of her past, and present, which do not coincide with the personae she wants to project to others.
This woman, Oma Hamou, Oma McConnell, Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Hamou, Oma Demian, Alexandra Murphy et al, has for YEARS now, threatened me with civil and criminal actions. For years now, NOTHING has happened except more ongoing threats online.
I am called a "criminal stalker". First, being called a criminal is Libel per se in Texas, since I have never been convicted of ANYTHING worse than one speeding ticket. As for a stalker, well, I have no clue where this woman is, where she lives, and frankly I don't WANT to know, nor can I care less. In the words of one of her attorney's, Dave. S. "the faster that woman is in my rearview mirror the happier I'll be" (yeah I have the email he said that to me in.). I WISH NO CONTACT WITH OR FROM THIS PERSON.
I do NOT wish this person ill, or harm. Frankly, I do not care about her. The less I hear about her, the better. That said, no one should ever be subjected to harm or danger. I DO NOT WISH THIS PERSON HARM, nor have I advocated, wished, nor advised anyone to harm her. Such allegations are baseless, wrong and defamatory. I just want he to leave me and my partner ALONE and stop the thousands of pages of defamatory lies she puts up and allows "friends" to post on her website in order to cause me harm.
OMA HAMOU BUSINESS ENTITY: "ENIGMA ROYAL FILMS, LLC."
Hamou has reactivated a dormant LLC, Enigma Royal Films. BEWARE however, that the "agent" for service of process is LONG out of date. Shari Leinwand with Gibson, Dunn NO LONGER SERVES AS AGENT. Oma Hamou aka Alexandra McConnell aka Oma McConnell is the TRUE agent for service of process. As an active LLC, there are large debts this LLC owes:
10/24/2002 Writ of Execution Issued (LOS ANGELES COUNTY, ENIGMA ROYAL FILMS,LLC, $82,012.56 ) by American Express. Case Number: PC027665 AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SER. CO. VS. ENIGMA ROYAL
02/07/2006 JUDGMENT ENTERED AS A FINAL DISPOSITION ON 02/07/06 . FOR (CURTIS, SUZANNE M) ATTORNEY AT LAW . AGAINST (HAMOU, OMA) , (ENIGMA ROYAL FILMS, LLC) Case Number: 05V09066 CURTIS, SUZANNE M VS. HAMOU, OMA
WORLD WIDE CONSTRUCTION ENTERPRISES, INC. was formed on 2009-10-30 in California by OMA HAMOU located at 22815 VENTURA BLVD STE 891, WOODLAND HILLS CA 91364 .
Universal ID CA-C3114859
Name WORLD WIDE CONSTRUCTION ENTERPRISES, INC.
Registration Number C3114859
Type CORP
Status CANCELED
Address 22815 VENTURA BLVD STE 891, WOODLAND HILLS CA 91364
Formation Date 2009-10-30
REGISTERED AGENT Name OMA HAMOU
Address 22815 VENTURA BLVD #891, WOODLAND HILLS CA 91364
OMA HAMOU AKA ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL BANKRUPTCY DISCREPENCIES AND TAX RECORD DISCREPENCIES:
Oma Hamou Alexandra McConnell filed for Bankruptcy twice with the Federal Court simply to derail legitimate enforcement of the many judgments against her . Here is her Bankruptcy Petition, this is the entire PDF file of 2mb, which is public record from the Court. She also filed tax returns with her lender trying to get a loan to purchase the O'Connor house. Comparing the two shows glaring discrepancies and untruths.
—Omission of Assets on Bankruptcy Petition and Schedules is considered A False Statement Under Penalty of Perjury, 18 U.S.C. § 152(3):
Oma Hamou owns two business entities, Enigma Films, Inc., and The Sarskaia Foundation plus Enigma Royal Films, LLC. Further, Oma Hamou owns and operates a website at www.OmaHamou.com, where she and alleged friends post information about her. Interestingly, Ms Hamou lists her own company, Enigma Films as her employer. The clear inference is that Enigma Films earns money with which to pay her as an employee. Yet, there is no declaration or disclosure of her ownership of these companies, nor disclosure of the value of these assets she owns.
HOWEVER: Her 2010 Tax Return states that she PURCHASED "Reseda Glass" in April 2010, three full months before the Bankruptcy filing.
Notice here in her Loan Application she lists $145,000 CASH as an asset, yet, she FAILS to identify exactly WHERE that cash is.
The Refai Judgment was just the previous year, yet she FAILED to disclose that to the lender. She lists small old debts, some as long ago as ten years, BUT FAILS TO DISCLOSE A SINGLE DEBT SHE LISTS ON THE BANKRUPTCY PETITION, JUST SIX MONTHS EARLIER. Interestingly, she doesn't list a SINGLE one of the debts on her Loan Application on her Bankruptcy Petition either!see below
Hamou received in excess of $50,000 in cash from Mr. Refai in May 2009, (see above) for which she signed a promissory note. Hamou made no disclosure of the whereabouts of this large sum of cash, nor did she disclose just where this substantial asset went. She FAILED to mention it to her lender as well...
Her 2010 IRS returns show "income" of $38,000 or $2,459 per month. She claims a "sole proprietorship" called "Reseda Glass" that "installs glass in high rise buildings" but has NO Federal Employer ID number, nor does she list any WAGES paid to any "employees". Is this almost 50 year old woman hanging off the side of a building installing glass ALL BY herself?
Her 2009 IRS Return, filed the same day (April 2011) swears that she was self employed earning $2,130 per month.
HOWEVER, her Bankruptcy Petition shows she claimed to have been employed for TEN YEARS by "Enigma Films and Glass Tech" earning $3,000 per month.
HOWEVER in, her LOAN APPLICATION Section IV "Employment Information" she wrote that "Reseda Glass" at the same address as her "residence", which is just actually a mail drop at a Fedex Office store, was her employer for TWO YEARS, and she earned $2459 per month.
—Omission of Assets on Bankruptcy Petition and Schedules is considered A False Statement Under Penalty of Perjury, 18 U.S.C. § 152(3).
Hamou McConnell Moran claims of violence, rape and cancer...
In 2002, she wrote to a Russian Orthodox Priest
Your Eminence: I am writing to you to ask you to remember me in your prayers- 2 weeks ago I underwent surgery to remove cancer from my colon and I have 100 stitches inside of me. The physicians told me yesterday that my white blood count is high and that I have 2 choices chemotherapy or another surgery as they fear that it is spread in my uterus. I am scared. I am a single mother and I work hard and now my life...my health is not good. I have been in the hospital and now I may have another surgery this week. Some things are worth more than money-
June 2007: Her ex husband confirms Oma Hamou was still claiming cancer:
I herd this from my daughter ...Anyway...according to (my daughter) that is the case...she has cancer and has fulfilled her name of Oma which means cancer in Latin.
May 11, 2009 "Alexandra McConnell" signs a promissory note borrowing $50,000 from Hamid Refai, Mr. Refai confirms, through his attorney Thomas Ward that "Alexandra McConnell" borrowed this money to pay for "cancer treatments"
This is further confirmed by an email from a former roommate who wrote on July 8, 2009: By the way Hamid's wife knows it was LIPOSUCTION you drained their bank account for, not cancer in your asshole.
August 23, 2010 on her website: yes she is still undergoing treatment for her cancer. I can definitely attest to the fact that she has indeed suffered from cancer. Those treatments are so hard on her that I have had to help her back to the car, then into her house and even into bed because they leave her so sick and weak that she cannot do anything.
Ask yourself if the following make any, rational or reasonable common sense:
This woman claims to be an actress and model, but for a decade steadfastly REFUSES to provide one single shred of evidence to support the allegation, not even a credit, reference or magazine issue. She says only "I was and I don't have to prove it. YOU have to prove I wasn't". Does that make sense?
This woman claims that her three felony convictions were not Her fault, but rather someone else's fault. Does THAT make sense?
This woman claims that her recent Felony Forgery Charges in San Bernardino are "just a big mistake" and "law enforcement and the DA" are on "her side" and "believe her", yet they STILL pressed charges and scheduling dozens of hearings over FOURTEEN MONTHS. Does THAT make sense??
This woman has claimed for six years non stop that I am being investigated by law enforcement and the FBI. Yet, NOTHING ever happened, I have never been contacted by law enforcement for any reason in those six years other than one speeding ticket. Does it make any sense to you that law enforcement is doing ANYTHING for six years now?
Buddha said Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense.
Look at all the blathering posts she has put up on the internet, and ask yourself, do these things agree with YOUR reason and your own common sense? The answer is obvious.
As you can see, this woman and/or her cronies now LIE, falsify documents and use years old private letters to attempt to defame and disparage me, and Bob Atchison
Many people whom have come into contact with her call her a con artist and scam artist. She hangs out with convicted felons, even inviting these career criminals to live in her house with her.
You can verify all the arrests, judgments, evictions, etc for yourself with simple online searches.
You are free to email me with your questions, Rob@AustinWineGuy.com, and if you yourself have been a VICTIM of this woman Oma Hamou, Oma McConnell, Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Hamou, Oma Demian, Alexandra Murphy and her NEWEST Alexandra Moran, I encourage you to contact me.
206 comments:
1 – 200 of 206 Newer› Newest»Clean new UPDATED blog, so the world can see that yet again A Judge has ruled in Bob's favor.
The Court clearly saw SnoopOmaSand looked indigent and the entire courtroom was appalled and also amused at the genuine insanity of SnoopOmaSand SHOUTING at the Judge and Bob's lawyer, pretending she has "hearing loss", (something a child drama queen would do, but not something anyone with genuine hearing loss EVER does.
At least the Judge heard it blather on about beatings and morphine, and saw the forged useless "hospital records" SnoopOmaSand literally threw at her, and still ruled AGAINST her and FOR Bob.
The word insane was apparently used a lot by those who witnessed the proceeding when describing SnoopOmaSand.
She's fairly blatant about having no intention of complying with a court judgment. Bitsy was hilarious describing her in-court performance and appearance, although I suppose that's only to be expected from someone who lives in the squalor those animal abuse photographs so graphically depicted.
All this misery from one human being. Astounding. She wrecks, deforms or flat-out kills everything she touches. And how does she wind up? A crazy old lady screaming at a courtroom that is laughing behind her back.
Also, Blake asked about what the position of the Orthodox Church is regarding witchcraft.
RJ
Well another McConnell was also in a Courtroom today.
Her brother Jackie beat his girlfriend to death. The autopsy has been completed. The murdered girlfriend was the sister of Debra McConnell.
That makes SnoopOmaSand's insane charade earlier today of alleging being beaten all the more callous, sociopathic and downright evil given what has happened in Albion.
Also downright insane.
I assume this question is being asked because because Oma has used Handmaiden of Satan as an online identity in the recent past and this what the women at the Feodorovsky Sobor called her. I have no idea why she is so proud of being called this. It makes no sense to me.
Being a witch or a sorcerer - casting spells and things like that - could be a part of someone's fantasy world. They could conduct ceremonies with stones, water, even family members. I have heard of such things.
The Orthodox church believes that anyone can be saved through repentance (but one would have to repent and this counts Oma out). Orthodoxy teaches that Satan has been defeated through the Resurrection of Christ and is therefore without power. Any witchcraft has absolutely no effect on anyone or anything - it would just be play acting and fantasy role-play.
Maybe Oma being Handmaiden of Satan is just fantasy role playing for her.
I sued Oma Hamou and won another judgment against her. It was a great, awesome day. Another victory where the court and yet one more judge stood behind me. Thank you judge, thank you Jeff Lewis and another thank you to the American justice system.
Regarding Oma's TRO that was based on her claim - absolute total lies she created out of thin air - that I had threatened to kill her; once the judge heard me the Court dissolved the initial TRO she had been granted because she had lied; denied her request for an injunction and - after hearing the ridiculous claims I had ordered two men to attack her the night before the hearing - dismissed her case entirely.
I have decided that I will never allow her to lie about me like this again without paying for it - this is why I sued her. The court and the judge said I was right to sue her, that she had abused the system and gave me a new judgment against her.
I will collect my judgment. Hamou insists that she will go jail and stay there for the rest of her life rather than obey the courts and pay me. Let's see what the future holds for her.
Let us look at a text book case of being genuinely disassociated from reality.:
Dressing like a homeless person and showing up late to court.
Shouting at a Judge pretending to be "hearing impaired", in an overtly over theatrical, drama queen fashion. Then not realizing that this makes the shouter look insane.
Presenting a hospital release document that clearly states one was treated for a "headache" and given Alleve for the headache as "proof of being beaten" and continuing to shout about it.
Ranting and raving while shouting at the Judge about things which had no bearing on the matter at hand. Then not actually grasping that the Judge reduced the amount of the Judgment awarded out of pity and nothing more because the person was behaving so insanely in the Courtroom the Judge just wanted to shut her up and get rid of her.
Not grasping that many people watching the spectacle believed the person behind it all was "obviously crazy" in their words.
Continuing to pursue the unfounded beating allegations even after her own brother who had a known history of violence and of beating his girlfriend regularly who then finally confessed to beating her to death and dumping her body.
Who is the one actually genuinely disassociated from reality?
BATTLE CREEK, MI – A magistrate ordered a man accused of killing his girlfriend held in the Calhoun County jail without bond.
Jackie Dale McConnell, 47, was arraigned Thursday, Jan. 30, in Calhoun County District Court on a charge of second-degree murder for allegedly using his fist to kill Donna Jean Frost, 42, and the magistrate denied any request for bond.
A preliminary examination was scheduled for Feb. 5.
McConnell told authorities he and Frost got into an argument, he hit her and she died, said Chief Assistant Prosecuting Attorney Matthew Smith. Police believe this happened in the home the couple shared on S. Eaton Street in Albion.
If convicted, McConnell will spend at least 25 years in prison because the prosecutor’s office charged him as a fourth habitual offender with at least on prior conviction of a violent offense. McConnell has been to prison for felonious assault, breaking and entering and criminal sexual conduct, according to Michigan Department of Corrections records.
I will not argue Hamou's fantasy spin on her repeated losses in court - or her compulsive and continuous lying. She will never stop this as long as she is free and has access to the internet.
Everyone knows I have won every time against her in court. Everyone knows she is a convicted felon, jailbird, scam-artist and animal hoarder-abuser. What a list! She has no credibility with anyone.
People who see her in court think she is mentally ill. The problem is her actions are dangerous to the public and to animals. She cannot restrain herself and she feels no remorse for her victims and the crimes she has committed.
In any case - she has much bigger problems to deal with rather than me.
Bob,
You should have phrased that as
"In any case - she has much bigger problems to deal with in addition to having to deal with me."
Your attorney will take every possible action on the day after the 30 day period she has to pay elapses should she not pay in full.
Unlike the Sister State Judgment, this is a COURT ORDER and Contempt of Court and Bench Warrants will be issued for her failure to comply.
You've got that right, Bob. Nitzi and I hadn't even unwrapped our Clark bars and settled in for the show when she blew, and I mean blew. First there was the preposterous "I'm deaf SO I WILL YELL LIKE A CRAZY PERSON!" routine. She must not have seen the eyerolling the judge was doing at that. Then she gives the judge a heap of papers that supposedly says she had medical treatment for her imaginary beating, and the Judge just said "this says you got aspirin for a headache" and again rolls her eyes. Honest to G-d, we're talking Crazy Lady here, you should have heard the comments from the people sitting around us. Then she and her old guy friend are in the hall and the Judge has to send for her and she comes in screaming like a bat because she's DEAF FROM A BEATING! My guess is that the nice lady Judge figured what the hell, the crazy woman hasn't got a dime to her name (or shampoo if you want to know the truth --- Oma, not for anything, but run a comb through it, will you?) so whether she awards Bob 2900 or 29 million, Oma doesn't have the bus fare to get home or the brains to walk.
Poor Nitzi was upset because of course she expected to see her in a black skirt with an oatmeal sweater and some lovely boots with the glasses perched on her nose because she is trying to look like the hot librarian type, and I told her, look, a lot of water has gone under the bridge since the days when she was passing out scented candles from the Dollar Store, sister dear. But Nitzi has such a forgiving heart you wouldn't believe. The brains, not so much just among us, but honestly, my sister could find something good to say about Jack the Ripper.
Anyway, she seemed pretty stunned when the nice lady Judge slammed her with the court costs, because she just kept pretending to be deaf and making the fish face thing she does. Oy.
Bitsy
In this morning's post, Hamou tries to create the impression that the judge believed her claims against Atchison using statements such as the following:
"because I didn't appear in court the case was dismissed"
"This and other reasons is why that SAME JUDGE granted my restraining order against you in the first place"
This is one of those posts we get from Hamou where it is unclear whether she is really that stupid or whether she is pretending to be that stupid.
Let's straighten her out on a couple of things.
First, a TRO is granted just on the claims of one party. It is not made permanent until the court hears the other side of the story.
When Hamou saw that Atchison was in court to tell the other side of the story, she sent Sproul in with that cockamamie story. (It was the same trick she used on Wednesday, when Sproul appeared in the courtroom well before Hamou. When he waited long enough to assure himself that Atchison was not there, he summoned Hamou to show up, thinking that she had a better chance without Atchison there to be heard.)
Now, Hamou keeps claiming that the judge believed her but HAD to dismiss the case because Hamou was unable to attend due to a beating.
This is crap, and Hamou knows it. The judge was perfectly free to grant the continuance that Hamou requested. Instead, the judge CHOSE to take the more drastic step of dismissing the case, because the reason for missing court was found by the judge to be insufficient based on evidence Hamou herself presented through Jim Sproul.
Clearly, if the judge at that point was believing anything about the original complaint, the judge would have continued the case instead of dismissed it.
The same thing goes for the award to Atchison of costs and fees. The California statute makes it clear that the judge has complete discretion to grant the prevailing party in the original matter all of his costs, some of his costs, or none of his costs.
If the judge believed the original claim by Hamou might have any merit, she could very easily have exercised the discretion the statute gives her and denied Bob any costs or fees.
Instead, her order granted Atchison full costs and fees. Only when the judge realized after Hamou's little ham-fisted melodrama that she was not dealing from a full deck did the judge reduce the payment.
There is a lesson here Hamou should try to absorb.
She cannot prevail against Atchison in court, even when she appears. He can prevail against her, even when he doesn't appear.
SnoopOmaSand is without doubt now wholly delusional. It's perception of reality is total fiction.
The "restraining order" it keeps bleating in all caps is a temporary one ONLY, PENDING THE ACTUAL HEARING. Nothing more and Courts always grant a petitioner's first request out of caution. Nothing more. Until they can get the FACTS in front of them.
Like the truth behind its LIE that Bob owns firearms. Nothing could be further from the truth. Neither of us ever has owned a weapon and there have never even been firearms inside this house since we moved in.
Blake is quite right that if any Judge believed a word SnoopOmaSand said, they would clearly have granted a continuance or given some chance for a hearing on the matter.
The reality is the Court found SnoopOmaSand's claims to be baseless. Remember that Bob's lawyer told the Judge in front of SnoopOmaSand that he had spoken to Det. Munoz, and that Munoz had never gotten back to him because SnoopOmaSand never provided the Detective with a single SHRED OF EVIDENCE to back up the allegations.
The Judge listened to it shout and scream about beatings and despite the fact it was totally improper, the Judge even looked at the same release report which said SnoopOmaSand was treated for headache, nothing more, and given Alleve.
The Judge then ordered SnoopOmaSand to pay up.
SnoopOmaSand should really try to grasp the genuine FACT that the words "crazy" and "insane" were used by onlookers present in Court that day.
Blake that was a great posting. The clock is ticking on those 30 days. I expect a few days before it runs out she'll throw a pile of paper at the court full of her drama and craziness that she will also plaster on her forum. She won't pay so we'll be able to proceed on contempt changes and bench warrants
Meanwhile she has her next hearing after her arrest for violating her probation on her Animal Abuse conviction on February 20th. She'll be able to relive the HazMat raid on her residence and the scene of law enforcement dragging her away to jail in handcuffs. I wish I had been there to see it.
The lie was really crazy - that I had spoken with her on the phone several times and that it started with discussions about an icon. For some reason I then threatened to kill her with a car, "piss on her grave" and that I had a gun. The story was so crazy nobody who heard it believed it. Hamou provided absolutely no evidence of any kind to back her claims. It was easy to refute. Rob you are right in what you posted.
None of the law enforcement people who Hamou told this story to followed up on it with me. I called Munoz myself and he then called me back.
No one has followed up on her lie that I had two men beat her up the night before the hearing. That tells you what law enforcement thought of her claim.
Let's not forget she claimed that I had two men break into Patrick's ranch, rape her over and over again while shouting at her the rape was in revenge from me. Remember the claim that she got pregnant from the rape and lost the baby. What a crazy lie.
Was there any police report on that invention? No. Did anyone ever contact me about it? No.
SnoopOmaSand is so delusional it doesn't even grasp that the Court Order signed by the Judge was drafted by Bob's lawyer NOT the Judge. It was page 11 of his motion.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"are you trying to say that had I appeared on October 23rd, 2013 that I would have not been able to prove my case?"
That's exactly what I'm saying. You have blathered all over the internet for years about all the things you are going to "prove" in court. But when it comes time to pony up, you are NEVER there.
You were going to get Atchison's judgment overturned against you in Texas.
But what happened? You failed to file a timely appeal.
You were going to file a Bill of Review to reverse the judgment.
But what happened? You could not meet the filing criteria, and your petition was dismissed.
You were going to get the debt to Atchison dismissed through bankruptcy.
But what happened? You failed to provide the schedules to the court that would prove your bankrupt status.
You were going to get the Texas bench warrant quashed.
But what happened? The court has not heard a word from you.
You were going to refile your RICO case once the bankruptcy impediment was removed.
But what happened? The federal court has seen neither hide nor hair of you since.
You were going to get the California Sister State Judgment thrown out if Atchison ever dared file for it because you were going to "prove" that the Texas judgment was invalid.
But what happened? You missed the deadline to object, and the Sister State Judgment is in place.
You were going to get a restraining order against Atchison.
But what happened? When he showed up in court and your case was called, you sent Sproul in with a piece of paper about some headache as an excuse to miss the appearance.
You were going to refile two weeks ago for another TRO.
But what happened? Nothing.
So, yes . . . i am saying that the 23rd was like any number of other instances of your internet huffing and puffing. You had no proof of the supposed death threats and all the other nonsense, so you did what you always do when you know your evidence amounts to zilch. You fail to show.
You were told many times that filing a Bill of Review was futile. But, just as we predicted (and hoped), your highly-dependable destructive compulsion took over and, by giving Atchison a way to serve you with enforcement proceedings, you triggered the shit storm that has been raining down on you ever since.
Here is what Atchison has achieved:
- There is a bench warrant for your arrest.
- You have contempt orders and sanctions imposed by the Texas court.
- He has a California Sister State judgment against you.
- You now owe him $2800 for costs and fees in addition to the ever-growing original judgment.
- He has you under orders to appear for a debtor's exam in California.
Here is what you have achieved:
-
*Applause for Blake*
You forgot to include in the list of what SnoopOmaSand has achieved :
Arrested and charged with animal cruelty for squalid filthy conditions
Convicted on said charges
Violation of probation for said conviction
Revocation of probation for violating probation
Arrested on a Felony Bench Warrant for revocation of probation
Pending charges for having 96 animals in horrific conditions in violation of court orders
Perpetrating Fraud on a Court by lying about being in Michigan when it's own family does not want it present and it was not in Michigan as represented to a Court. Yes we have proof of this.
More Court ordered Sanctions for costs in favor of Bob. Now a total of almost $5000 still unpaid despite Court orders.
Bill of Review Dismissed
Bankruptcy Dismissed
RICO dismissed
civil restraining order application DISMISSED
So Hamou is back on Twitter today. I guess she's not too worried about people she has stiffed tracking her down that way, such as the cleaning person for whose services Hamou has now bounced TWO checks.
That lady sounds mighty pissed, though.
Mighty pissed.
Yes Blake. Mighty pissed indeed. The house cleaner lady is not a happy camper and is no fan of Hamou McConnell at all.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"I have not issued 2 checks to any person much less an alleged housekeeper!"
Read more carefully. No one said you issued the checks directly to the cleaning person.
You know what the arrangement was.
So do we.
You know the lady who cleaned the houses for you. You had "Jim" call her. You spoke to her...now you don't take her calls anymore.
That's what we know...along with the rest. No need to tell you what you already know.
They really should have a special room dedicated to just you, Oma, where you can sit and file restraining orders all day long against all of the people with legitimate grievances against you. Cleaning people you stiffed, people who need the money for the services you conned out of them. Creditors like Bob Atchison and Hamid Refai who have obtained legitimate judgments against you. People whose homes you have trashed and who had to pay to have you evicted and their properties put to rights. Animal control agencies that have had to assume responsibility for the poor creatures you have starved, abused and tortured to the point that they have died. People that you scammed regarding your pretend movie and fim company. All of Pushkin.
You are a very sick woman, in the sense that mental illness is a sickness. But you are also an evil one. Why? Because so much of your behaviors are willful choices to inflict deliberate harm upon innocent human beings and animals, including your poor son. They're aren't enough restraining orders in the state of California to cover the number of people who have been hurt by the way you have chosen to live your life, girlfriend
RJ
RJ - that last paragraph was wonderful and summed it all up very well.
Watch how she is spinning and lying about the housekeeper. She simply cannot stop herself from lying. It's actually sickening to witness it, it gives me a feeling of repulsion and disgust. After all these years of her lies I can never stop being astounded by the manic ruthlessness and cruelty in her frenzied attacks on her victims.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"I will also be obtaining a second restraining order against him [Atchison]."
One can only hope.
SnoopOmaSand posted that she has:
"received messages forwarded to me from Rob Moshein to Mary Sailer"
Yeah, right.
If you had them you would post them.
You know it, and we know it.
This malarkey just joins the long, long list of all that "evidence" you are going to produce in "future litigation" -- litigation for which you NEVER show when it comes time to put the proof before the judge.
Mary S. has said she will gladly fly out to any place Hamou McConnell will be on criminal trial and will happily and voluntarily testify as to her experiences if called upon.
Neither she nor I have sent our correspondence to anyone else, aside from Bob.
Period
It lies, as usual. Truth would burn and scald Hamou McConnell like boiling Holy Water mixed with hydrochloric acid.
The University of Texas at Austin
Department for Slavic and Eurasian Studies, and the Center for Russian, East European and Eurasian Studies present:
Symposium
Food for Thought Culture and Cuisine in Russia & Eastern Europe, 1800-present
February 7, 2014
The Julius Glickman Conference Center College of Liberal Arts Building UT Austin, 11:15AM
Special Session
Rob Moshein Longtime collector and connoisseur of Imperial Russian art and antiques. Short presentation on Tsarist Russian culinary artifacts Exhibit to follow
Oma Hamou (aka Alexandra McConnell), longtime collector and connoisseur of yard furnishings, will be making a short presentation on animal care, exhibits to follow. Date: February 20, 2014. Place: Michael D. Antonovich Antelope Valley Courthouse.
Remember to bring your pets, and don't worry about taking them home! Oma will either kidnap them or kill them. Or both, for a modest fee!
And crowds are starting to gather in Times Square for the imminent release of Oma's tweets about her personal life. You can feel the electricity building!
This is unbelievable! There is footage of her in a dress store! It's almost documentary quality!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLenBI6EKBM
Yes, dear old Bubbles just can't manage to keep her clothes on in front of a camera.
Remind you of anyone?
Saddened crowds are leaving Times Square, after their vigil to be present when "personal tweets" were issued fell flat.
Apparently, there was an issue with the spa.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8r8A6QbeXyE
RJ - those videos were so, so funny.
GREAT NEWS!!! The Writ of Execution has been approved!!! I have a copy - filed, signed and in force. It was issued January 30, 2014 so now I can attach Hamou's escrow money. The Sheriff has directed them to turn it over to me. I hope we can do this in the next few days. Yet another victory.
More sour grapes from Hamou/McConnell...
I didn't ask the University of Texas for permission to speak at their Symposium. The Professor in charge was a guest in our home for a meeting with Bob on unrelated matters, and she asked ME to come speak and exhibit pertinent items from my collection after seeing it and talking at length with me about it.
Great news Bob's Writ of Execution is now in effect and in the hands of the LASD!
Poor, deluded SnoopOmaSand. She posted:
"It is a Motion filed asking the court to set aside that Writ of Execution"
Won't happen. That Writ flows from the Sister State Judgment. She had 30 days to object to the entry of the Sister State Judgment, and she failed to do so.
That judgment and the ensuing Writ will no more be set aside than the original Texas verdict was set aside when she tried that hare-brained Bill of Review ploy.
For some reason, Hamou doesn't think procedural rules about filing appeals apply to her.
Oh, well. Let her try. It'll just be another victory Atchison can add to his growing list of legal victories against her.
The Woman Who Sued Herself struts her sad, saggy stuff yet again.
Dear Oma Posting as "Snoopy",
Thanks, dear, I look at myself in the mirror every day with no problems at all. Can you say the same? I have never killed an animal, I have never defrauded other human beings, I have several Russian friends who think highly of me, I had a long satisfying career that enabled me to retire in some comfort, travel and support numerous charities; I have a wide circle of friends that thanks to you now includes Bob Atchison, Rob Moshein, Blake Springpasture, a space alien, talking cats, a woman who subsists on watercress sandwiches and best of all, the lovely Kedem clan from Israel and Brooklyn (and Los Angeles, if you count Bitsy and Nitzi, which I certainly do! They're great gals!).
Meanwhile, you have degenerated into a crazy old woman screaming at a court that is laughing behind her back. A lifetime of con artistry has brought you to this stage of your "career": there are judgments against you galore, animal control agencies have you in their sights, and if what I hear is to be believed --- and I have no reason to doubt it, girlfriend --- you are heading for a stretch in the hoosegow.
So when you look in the mirror, what do you see? A princess shilling a movie that never existed? A mother who has failed her most basic obligations to her child? A client who has stiffed virtually everyone who has ever had dealings with her?
That's a lot of choices. Congratulations.
RJ
I really don't understand why Hamou goes out of her way to demonstrate her ignorance.
She posted:
"my Texas Bill of Review was denied not because of the merits of the cause of action rather because of a technicality of my not having filed something that I should have"
First, she does not appear to know what a "technicality" is in legal parlance. It is something such as entering a wrong number, using a term inappropriately, or using a wrong form. And courts allow technical errors to be corrected.
Hamou's Bill of Review was not dismissed on a technicality. It was dismissed because she did not meet the two fundamental jurisdictional threshholds: it may not be used in lieu of an appeal which could have been filed; and it may rely only on evidence extrinsic to the original trial, not intrinsic to it.
These was not a "technicality" that could be corrected with an amended filing. It was a core failure to meet the statutory requirements to qualify for a Bill of Review.
Besides, her claim that the Bill failed just because she did not file something she should have makes her look even more idiotic.
Jurisdictional strictures and the difference between intrinsic and extrinsic evidence are perhaps a bit hard for legal novices to understand.
However, simply failing to file something on a timely basis is the mistake of a nitwit or of someone too lazy to tend to affairs.
Hamou has bragged in the past about how finely honed her legal skills are, claiming to have written briefs that impressed lawyers and prosecutors alike. (This despite the fact that she has lost every one of two dozen cases in which an opponent appeared against her.)
Yet, besides accidentally suing herself on her first attempt at a Bill of Review, she failed to grasp the purpose of a Bill of Review or why it cannot be used an an alternative form of appeal.
Once again, if her Bill of Review had been dismissed on a "technicality", the court would have allowed an amended pleading to correct the error. No such amended pleading was allowed, because the failure went to the core purpose of the procedure.
Now, the Woman Who Sued Herself will pretend not to understand any of this.
But besides being a nitwit, she's a liar.
Blake, well put. Thank you.
The Imperial Russian presentation at the University of Texas went wonderfully. Some 60 scholars from across the country and Europe attended while I talked about Russian Imperial Antiques and art related to Dining and food, and displayed a portion of my collection.
It was fabulous and they were a very interested and engaging crowd. Several of the professors want to stay in contact with me as I had a lot to share with them.
and as usual. Hamou/McConnell is LYING plain and clear. There is NO COURT ORDER on file with the LA Superior Court stopping Bob's Writ of Execution. HERE is the case file updated as of now:
Case Summary
Case Number: 12CA4265
ATCHISON, ROBERT D. VS. HAMOU, OMA
Court: Stanley Mosk Courthouse
Original Case Number: 12C04265
Original Court: Michael Antonovich Antelope Valley Courthouse
Filing Date: 10/11/2012
Case Type: SIS STATE JUDGMNT (Limited Jurisdiction)
Status: DISPOSED BY JUDGMENT
Future Hearings
04/03/2014 at 01:30 PM in department 77 at 110 North Grand Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90012
ORDER FOR APPEARANCE OF JUDGMENT DEBTOR
History Information
Parties
Plaintiff: ATCHISON ROBERT D.
Attorney: LAW OFFICES OF CHRISTIAN SCHANK - LEWIS, JEFFREY A
Defendant: HAMOU OMA
Attorney: None
Party Information
Histories ( Dates listed in descending order)
01/30/2014 WRIT OF EXECUTION ISSUED TO LOS ANGELES COUNTY ON BEHALF
OF JUDGMENT CREDITOR , RECEIPT NO. #457478129 .
01/30/2014 DECLARATION RE: ACCRUED INTEREST FILED, $ 2075.27 .
Hamou LIES like the insane narcissist it has become.
There IS NO COURT ORDER. If there WERE it would have been posted a thousand times by it already.
It posts no such thing.
If there were, Bob's lawyer would UNDER LAW have had to be given notice and COPIES of the "order"
Bob's lawyer got NOTHING.
THIS IS A DELUSIONAL LIE. Just like the one about being in Albion at her "Mother's bedside" to avoid attending the Jan. 7 Probation Revocation Hearing.
Lies Lies Lies Lies.
Rob, Blake, RJ:
It's amazing that she posts things over and over again that can so easily be disproved. Nothing was filed - just like so many, many times in the past.
It's just blustering, like a old, toothless chimp hopping up and down - hooting and screeching - all the while flinging its own feces at visitors to the zoo. (Hamou does not have to reach far for her own fecal ammunition!)
I do not know where Hamou McConnell "was" on Jan 7. However I do know where it was NOT.
Hamou McConnell bleated:
I am sick 2 day lost my voice n have a high temperature.
Which means in reality that somebody is looking for it, it owes people money and is hiding out.
Who is "Greg"?? Why should we care?? Why should the Police care???
Typical insane bleating.
That whole sentence about Greg's phone number made no sense, as she uses "they" in different places that seem to mean different people but without identifying who "they" are with each reference.
Half of what she writes is indecipherable because of her atrociously bad grammar.
She probably just threw the name "Greg" out as one of her fishing expeditions trying to figure out how we get keep getting new information on her and her scams.
She tries desperately to avoid the simple fact that we just sit back these days and wait for the phone to ring or a new email to come in from another of her victims, as more and more of her victims are realizing the scope of her scams by reading about her on the internet.
Hamou tweeted:
"The social fabric of Russia is woven into a beautiful multi-colored tapestry that is rich in its heritage."
Uh, how can a fabric be woven into a tapestry?
Threads can be woven into a fabric or a tapestry, but a fabric cannot be woven into anything.
Once again, in trying to appear knowledgeable and sophisticated Hamou simply appears the fool with her inept use of English.
Blake it's grasp of geography is no better. It bleated it hoped tourists to Sochi will visit Pushkin. That is some 1500 miles away.
That's like hoping tourists in Seattle visit Dallas.
It will be great to have that escrow money. It will be the first step towards collecting the full amount.
It's only six weeks until her debtor's exam. She'll be under oath and there will be a court reporter and a complete audio and video record taken.
Hamou can go to jail if she fails to appear for her debtor's exam. If she does not show up, the court will find her in civil contempt for disobeying its order. If she ignores the court's summons, it most certainly will issue a warrant for her arrest. When she is found in contempt, the court will issue sanctions against her, which can include fines and jail time.
If she gives false or misleading answers, she could be punished for perjury. She cannot refuse to answer our questions.
At the debtor's examination, she will not be allowed to dispute the debt or raise arguments about the my judgment, including whether she feels she owes the debt. The exam is limited solely to how I can collect the debt from her.
This is really something to look forward to - and the days are counting down fast.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"I guess neither you or your attorney have received a copy of the court order that says you will not be collecting any money from any account in connection to me."
Apparently the court is not aware of its own order, either.
The most recent entry on the Los Angeles Superior Court website reads:
"01/30/2014 WRIT OF EXECUTION ISSUED TO LOS ANGELES COUNTY ON BEHALF OF JUDGEMENT CREDITOR [Atchison], RECEIPT NO. #457478129."
Of course, Hamou can clear up the confusion simply by posting the order she claims she has quashing the Writ of Execution and rescinding the summons to appear for the debtor's exam.
My bet is we'll see no such posting.
It can't post what doesn't exist. There is no such Court order according to the LA Superior CourtS Clerk Office.
Hamou Mcconell lies as per usual It would have posted any papers by now.
Just as I thought. When challenged to post that supposed court order quashing the Writ of Execution and canceling the debtor's exam, what do we get from Hamou?
About the 57th post of that restraining order she got against Patrick O'Connor and which she has falsely claimed innumerable times was about to result in his arrest.
This new court order is about as real as the quashing of the Texas bench warrant; the check she was sending to Austin for the sanctions; the expungement of her felony convictions in Wyoming, Utah, and Montana; the overturning of the Sister State judgment; the refiling of her RICO case; the new TRO she was going to get against Atchison.
If Hamou could pull off in a court even 5% of what she claims on the internet to have done or be about to do, she would be formidable, indeed.
As it is, she continues to rack up loss after loss after loss against Atchison.
She lost the original case in a jury verdict.
Her Bill of Review was denied.
Her attempts to use bankruptcy to obliterate the debt to Atchison were thwarted.
Her RICO case against Atchison was dismissed.
Sanctions have been imposed against her for contempt of court.
A California judgment has been issued against her in favor of Atchison.
A Writ of Execution allowing Atchison to levy against her assets has been issued in California.
Her petition for a permament restraining order against Atchison was dismissed.
And, in his most recent victory, she has been ordered to pay Atchison's costs and attorney fees relating to that petition.
Meanwhile, while all this has been going on, the original judgment for around $10,000 has now grown to over $30,000 owing to Atchison, with the statutory interest, the sanctions, and the recent award of costs and fees.
And for all her huffing and puffing on the internet about all the legal mayhem she is going to unleash against Atchison, the fact is that there is nothing -- absolutely nothing -- she can do about any of these losses except to stay in hiding, duck court dates, and hope she doesn't get picked up on a bench warrant.
Meanwhile, over in criminal court, another scenario is playing out that has already seen her arrested twice in the past year and that threatens to put her in jail for a considerable stretch.
The woman is a career con artist, a sociopath, and an animal abuser . . . and the net is finally closing in on her tug by tug.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"Maybe because they [Animal Control] know my life has been threatened by a bunch of people who in the past have contacted animal rescue groups and lied to them"
I see.
So Animal Control and the District Attorney are dropping the prosecution against you, are they?
And please do hurry up with that RICO filing. We can't wait to see Judge Klausner's reaction when he compares the two "Sproul" signatures from the promissory note in the Refai case and the proof of service you submitted to his court.
And when can Atchison expect service of the new TRO? Will it come before or after the 30-day deadline for your paying his costs and attorney fees from your last attempt to get a restraining order against him?
And please tell us why the Travis County Court keeps dragging its feet in notifying Atchison of any challenge to the bench warrant it issued for your arrest?
Oh, yeah, and be sure to raise hell with the Los Angeles Superior Court for being so slow to notify Atchison of your appeal of his Sister State judgment against you.
And of its quashing of the Writ of Execution.
And of its canceling the debtor's exam.
Boy, these courts sure are slow.
Oh, sweetie. Please, please tell me that the naked picture of you really is on top of the pile of crazy that you call an affidavit, and that you really did submit this thing to the court? Please!
Regarding the Sister State judgment, SnoopOmaSand posted:
"I didn't file but intend to either tomorrow or Thursday."
I see. So the court is going to waive the requirement just for you that an objection has to filed within 30 days of entry of the judgment?
Regarding the Writ of Execution, SnoopOmaSand posted:
"An Ex Parte Motion is being prepared and should be filed in the morning or on Thursday"
I see. So you were lying when you posted that a court order was already on the way to Atchison quashing the writ and canceling the debtor's exam?
Regarding her recent arrest, SnoopOmaSand posted:
"I was ONLY arrested because both my then counsel of record and I failed to appear in court"
I see. So what else is new?
That's why Travis County issued a bench warrant for your arrest. That's why Hamid Refai got a bench warrant for your arrest. That's why the LAX Sheriff station was holding a bench warrant for your arrest. That's why your bankruptcy petition was dismissed. That's why your petition for a restraining order against Atchison was dismissed. That's why you have more than a dozen default judgments against you.
(I'm tempted to ask who raped and beat you the night before the probation violation hearing, but you get raped and beaten so regularly that it's really pointless.)
Oma Hamou on Mon Feb 10, 2014 3:31 pm
Because of the court order issued it specifically states I do not have to attend the upcoming debtors hearing with respect to the judgement you won because you cheated. Soon, very soon you will receive a copy of said notice from the court
by Oma Hamou on Tue Feb 11, 2014 7:14 pm
An Ex Parte Motion is being prepared and should be filed in the morning or on Thursday regarding my Motion for a Stay of Execution and other such Motions.
OOOPSIE. It can't keep its stories straight. Again...
BREAKING NEWS
Word just received that Sgt. Rachel Montez-Kemp of the L. A. Animal Control Major Case Unit is in possession of two affidavits proving that Hamou/McConnell had her lawyer lie to the judge on January 7 about her being in Michigan to care for her mother.
Wow!
So Hamou used her mother's suffering with terminal brain cancer as an excuse to duck yet another court appearance.
We knew how low Hamou/McConnell could go after we saw her email to Broadrush claiming almost to have been a 9/11 victim. But to use her own mother's suffering to create a lie in order to duck a court appearance. That really is about as low as one can go and is further proof that Hamou/McConnell will tell any lie to anyone about anything to get herself out of a jam.
Now the question is whether her attorney knew he was lying to the judge on January 7 or whether he was another unwitting dupe of Oma Hamou/McConnell.
It will be very interesting to see what happens if Hamou/McConnell gins up another excuse not to appear in court on February 20 and the District Attorney presents the judge with these two affidavits.
It will also be interesting to see the expression on her lawyer's face when this pops . . . if he is even still her lawyer by then.
I had a long talk just now with the Burbank police department about Hamou's claims about me. I filled them in on what's up next week and her recent arrest. Also we went through her claims again. I'll be doing the same with Munoz next week. He's off for a couple of days. I am not under investigation by them for anything. Hamou is just making that up. I will make sure this time that the Burbank police department stops her from lying. The lies have to stop.
Yep. Lying to your lawyer to have them perpetrate a fraud on a Court is a form of PERJURY in California:
CA Penal Code Pen. Code, § 118:
(a)Every person who, having taken an oath that he or she will testify, declare, depose, or certify truly before any competent tribunal, officer, or person, in any of the cases in which the oath may by law of the State of California be administered, willfully and contrary to the oath, states as true any material matter which he or she knows to be false, and every person who testifies, declares, deposes, or certifies under penalty of perjury in any of the cases in which the testimony, declarations, depositions, or certification is permitted by law of the State of California under penalty of perjury and willfully states as true any material matter which he or she knows to be false, is guilty of perjury.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"anonymous calls had been made to the City of Lancaster Building authorities"
Uh, oh. It looks as if another set of neighbors have had their fill of a junkyard in their neighborhood.
What's so entertaining about this is that we knew nothing of this new complaint, just as we knew nothing about the recent complaints to Animal Control until after her second arrest. We just sit back and let Hamou dig her own hole by spilling the beans herself.
And I notice she's staying mum about those affidavits.
I wonder how Michael Kraut is going to react once he finds out that she caused him, an officer of the court, to tell the judge a lie in open court.
A thought just occurred to me.
Given how angry the woman from Kat Kleaning was about getting stiffed by Hamou, she could be a good candidate for the person who reported conditions at the house in Lake Los Angeles. She was, after all, in a position to observe things there.
That's what bilking someone out of $1700 can do.
Or maybe it was the person Hamou stiffed on another bill in Littlerock and whose wife made the report to Animal Control that resulted in her most recent arrest.
Hamou must have a chronic sore neck from having constantly to look over her shoulder, given how long the line of people is whom she has conned.
She's playing with fire as more people are getting angry when they find out were scammed by a professional con artist, and sooner or later she's going to get engulfed.
Actually, she might be luckier than she realizes to get a jail term for a while.
One week from tomorrow, we will find out how the Judge feels when proof is handed to him that Hamou/McConnell was not in Albion Michigan on January 7, and that statement made to him that was the reason for no showing at a Criminal Hearing was a LIE.
Yes, those affidavits will be iron clad evidence that the court was LIED TO on January 7.
I'm certain that when he revokes the probation and imposes a SENTENCE about JAIL TIME, he will take that into consideration.
The horror story of what happened to Kat Kleaning was disgusting. Hamou preys upon the poor and the weak, the easily exploited. She knew what she was doing and Sproul was involved again.
Then the lies in court about Albion and her mother - simply revolting, inhuman, inexcusable conduct. Are we surprised?
Of course there's no comment about this from Hamou. Her lies have been exposed again.
Munoz will want to know about this lie in court.
Regarding the two affidavits, SnoopOmaSand posted:
"anything this schmuck publishes on the web about me must be regarded with skepticism and suspicion"
Well, why don't you just send someone into court on the 20th with another lie about why you cannot appear and see whether the D.A. then shows the affidavits to the judge. (Probably not a good idea to have Kraut do it again, though.)
SnoopOmaSand also posted:
"This is a man who dragged the good name of Bishop Markell and the Russian Orthodox Church through the mud"
Speaking of the offending the Russian Orthodox Church, could you tell us its view of witchcraft?
As I said, the phone just keeps ringing.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"if indeed those 2 affidavits are real you are pretending to know for certain that the court is going to believe the people who executed them are telling the truth"
Oh, I think the court will believe them easily enough when the judge sees who swore them out.
As for motive, my guess is that Animal Control and the D. A. are too busy to keep coming to court while you play your bob-and-weave games, and they just decided to short-circuit them.
Frankly, I hope you don't show up on the 20th. It's a crap shoot whether the judge would give you any jail time for blowing off the probation terms. But I'm pretty sure he'll issue a bench warrant if you don't show again and he then sees those affidavits.
And your lawyer will have some explaining to do, too. My guess is he'll throw you under the bus and put the pedal to the metal if you leave him standing in court again to parrot your lies.
Any doubt Hamou McConnell has about the reality of the affidavits and who swore them will be easily removed on the 20th of February. I have no doubt the DA will happily show them to it.
We strongly encourage the lawyer see the proof Hamou McConnell LIED to him about being at her Mothers bedside on Jam 7
Yep, she's freaking out over on her forum.
Of course, why not? Since she knows she was not in Michigan anywhere near January 7 she knows she has reason to worry about the source of those affidavits and what they say.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"you know for a fact that my attorney said to the court I was at my Mother's bedside on January 7"
His exact words on January 7 were, "she is in Michigan on a family matter, your Honor. Her mother has cancer."
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"I just spoke with my attorney about this matter because we are entitled to know the identity of the alleged woman you claim to know for certain I had stiffed on a bill"
You think so, huh?
SnoopOmaSand also posted:
"a woman who you say has contacted you told you she is responsible for contacting Animal Control"
I never said this woman contacted me. Pay attention.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"Enough, I will find out tomorrow."
No, you won't.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"I am not worried and neither is my attorney"
Your attorney has no reason to worry. All he will tell the court when he sees those affidavits is that you lied to him.
You, on the other hand, will be in a bit more complicated of a predicament.
I will say only it is clear it doesn't know who executed the affidavits. Yet...
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"I now know who signed it [the affidavits] and why"
Okay, then. Tell us who signed them. And why.
Blake it doesn't know who swore the affidavits clearly. It can find out in its own good time and not from us.
Well, I see she has failed to post the names of the people who signed those affidavits. So she obviously doesn't know.
It also fails to grasp that the ONLY things going to be addressed in Court 7 short days from now are the questions of JAIL TIME for having probation revoked and explaining why its lawyer told the JUDGE the LIE that it was "at her mother's bedside caring for her" for not appearing in person on January 7.
I rather doubt shouting at the Judge will help with any leniency in sentencing.
You know, Hamou-McConnell, you will never accept responsibility for anything you have done, nor will you obey any judge or court order.
You have published on the web that I had two men break into your house and rape you - and that you lost the baby.
You told the police that I had threatened to kill you this past summer. The story you made up was amazing and stupid.
You claimed I had you beaten the night before our TRO hearing and constantly post this on the web.
Those are all fantastic lies that you just made up. You have no evidence, nothing. I have had more than ten years of your endless lies while I have watched you create new victims, ignore arrest warrants and order after court order - while you post endless BS and more lies about me on the web.
You are the convicted felon, you are the one who has defied every single court order and judge in my case against you. You are the one who has killed hundreds of animals.
I have done none of these things. I have never lied in court, I have never been arrested, I don't have a criminal record, I am not an animal hoarder and abuser. You are all these things.
You have no shame, no remorse, no empathy. Everyone knows who you are and what you are. I will never stop my battle in court until you pay me the money you owe me and stop lying about me.
You have said you will go to jail before you obey the judges and court orders. You disobeyed the judge who ordered you to have no animals. Please go to jail and stay there for a long, long time. No more victims of your scams and no more dead animals.
I just read what you posted. This is why you are so dangerous to both people and animals. You will never, ever admit to anything you have done.
You will never obey a judge, or a court order.
You will steal, lie and kill animals and you cannot stop yourself.
This is why society needs to protect itself from you.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"the affidavits signed and notarized by my Mother and Brother only says one thing: Oma McConnell was not in Michigan on January 7th, 2014"
According to the copies I was read, they say a good bit more. They say you have not been near your mother since the summer of 2012. They say that they are unaware of your being with any family members on or around January 7. They say that you are in no way involved in the care of your mother. They say that it is not in the best interest of your mother to have you around her -- which is a truly extraordinary thing for a dying mother to feel about a daughter.
Tell us, Oma. What is it like to have one of the last things your mother feels she has to do on this earth to remain honorable is sign an affidavit proving her daughter lied to a court?
My guess is it makes you angry and frustrated that you have been thwarted but otherwise rolls off your back like water off a duck.
As I posted earlier without even knowing about those affidavits, it was obvious those overwrought, melodramatic tweets about your poor, dear dying mother were nothing more than one of your cheesy stage props meant to put the limelight on you and your noble "suffering".
You are a true sociopath, and the void of empathy in which you live telegraphs loud and clear through all the pseudo-emotions you try to portray but simply cannot pull off.
And, by the way, you still have not answered another question:
How does a devout Russian Orthodox such as you claim to be reconcile that with practicing witchcraft? Have you discussed it with those prelates to whom you supposedly turn for spiritual succor?
Blake, as I have posted earlier Bishop Markel never thinks of Hamou, he never prays for her, never lights a candle for her and has had no contact with her for many years. he wants no contact with her. The lies she has posted about him praying for her, lighting candle and such are just more lies.
I have offered to arrange a meeting with the Russian Orthodox Church and Hamou. They can discuss her claims about the hierarchy supporting her and the reports of witchcraft. She can argue her own case to them and explain these reports. They can also review her long list of victims and criminal history. I know many of her victims would appear in person to testify against her before church officials.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"The important thing here is that again you confirm how you interfere with my life"
Actually, the important thing is that you had your lawyer lie to a judge, and you have been caught dead to rights at it.
SnoopOmaSand also posted:
"Mom's affidavit did not say what they say it does."
The statement about your mother's best interest was in your brother's affidavit.
SnoopOmaSand also posted:
"why don't you publish this document"
It's not in my hands. It was only read to me. Whether or not I am lying will become clear to you once the affidavits are put before a judge by the Los Angeles County authorities who obtained the affidavits.
SnoopOmaSand also posted:
"I don't practice witchcraft"
So what do you call it when you take stones from your father's grave, put them in a bathtub of water, and then put your son in the tub with them? (You know, the stones you took from the fresh grave when you missed his funeral after calling from Detroit two hours before the funeral asking that it be postponed and that someone come to pick you up -- a request which your family ignored.)
No wonder little Nicholas is so screwed up.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"What about my LEGAL RIGHTS as a defendant?"
Your legal rights as a defendant do not include immunity from having your claims to the court checked out.
No adverse party is required to take you at your word, especially when you have such a storied history of skipping court dates with all manner of excuses.
Claw and screech all you want and try to deflect any way you can -- you have been caught dead to rights, and you know it.
Since Bob Atchison has been the victim so many times of your avoiding court dates he spent time and money to secure -- and no doubt will be again -- he has every right to whatever information anyone is willing to give him of their own free will to show a pattern to your lies.
That is quite likely the reason the contents of those affidavits have been shared with him.
You might as well get over it, because there is not a damned thing the police, a D.A., or anyone else will do for you.
Seriously, do you think any law enforcement officer or court agent will rush into the breach on your behalf because you claim that Atchison got his hands on proof that you lied to a court?
Nitwit.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"those affidavits will be provided to my attorney"
Then cool your jets and quit freaking out. You'll be able to examine them for yourself soon enough.
Well Hamou - here you go:
http://omahamou.com/oma/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=57&p=9695
Tue May 12, 2009 9:40 am
The open secret of was Oma raped, raped directly because someone believed the words of Bob’s story about her and the stuff on the web about her is true and documented. That they who attacked, beat and raped her taunting her with Bob’s words while raping her saying that they had read the words on the Blogs and she deserved this because she uses men and cheats people like their blog says she does is also documented. Rob’s Blog is also documenting the attitude around Rob and their attitudes of all women deserve it when they get raped and how they laugh at Oma for being raped. The police report about these events also documents that the words on the web in the various Blogs were believed and this is why her pets and animals that she had rescued were literally murdered and why what happened to her in the aftermath happened...As an aftermath Oma did get pregnant from that rape and for moral reasons and respect for life kept the baby rather than aborting it. She had complications and ended up losing the baby in a premature birth.
May 13, 2009 9:22 am
Someone read Bob’s story on the web and she was attacked, beaten and raped while having Bob’s words thrown in her face. Now we find Rob and those commenting on HIS Blog laughing at this. Oma did not sleep last night because of reliving this and in anger and fear over what was on Rob’s Blog, she had begged us to not say anything about the rape as it was so personally devastating and she did not want to have to relive and relive it, time and time again.
Tue May 12, 2009 9:40 am
As an aftermath Oma did get pregnant from that rape and for moral reasons and respect for life kept the baby rather than aborting it. She had complications and ended up losing the baby in a premature birth.
You posted as Mike Newson and also said:
The police report about these events also documents that the words on the web in the various Blogs were believed and this is why her pets and animals that she had rescued were literally murdered and why what happened to her in the aftermath happened.
Well, where's the police report? There never was one - another huge lie. Hamou you can't get away with this stuff anymore.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"why would the State of California do this to my mother who is dying of cancer, why did they lie to my brother and to my family, why didn't they contact my attorney instead it relied on information provided to them by a man who won a judgment against me"
No one "did" anything to your mother other than ask her if you were caring for her in Michigan on or around January 7, 2014.
To her great credit, she chose to give an honest answer to that question, as did your brother, who also seems to be very responsible and straightforward.
You can try to make this about everyone else in the world but you, but the plain fact is that none of this would have happened or could have happened had you not had your attorney LIE TO THE COURT.
The only person who has done anything disrespectful to your mother is YOU, who have contributed nothing toward her care but have milked her very sad health situation to gin up sympathy for yourself on Twitter and to cover a non-appearance in court with a lie.
This is not what a loving daughter would do. It is, however, exactly what a sociopath would do.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"It wasn't fair, a call should have been made to my attorney and explanations would have been provided as well as documentation"
I see. So exactly what "documentation" would your attorney have provided to prove you were in Michigan caring for your mother?
Your mother and your brother swore out those affidavits under oath. What you are doing here is calling them both liars and perjurers.
Of course, given the way you operate, that won't be of the least concern to you, since getting yourself out of another self-created pickle is ALL that ever matters to you.
And it's a real hoot to see someone who lies to courts and police about rapes, beatings, and caring for family members complain with a straight face that she has been ill used.
"IF"
by Junkyard Living:
IF Hamou McConnell had not told her attorney it couldn't attend the Jan. 7 hearing for probation revocation because it was in Michigan, caring for its dying mother, nobody would have raised the question.
IF its Mother felt harassed, she could have refused to talk or swear under oath her daughter was NOT with her on or about Jan. 7.
IF its brother didn't want to swear it lied to a Court it was in Albion on or about Jan. 7, nobody forced him to do that.
IF it had not had 96 animals after being ORDERED by a COURT to have NO ANIMALS, it would not have been ARRESTED.
IF it had written a GOOD check to Huiku Batchelor it would not have been ARRESTED on felony forgery charges.
IF it had actually had money, it would have BOUGHT Patrick's house instead of Squatting in the property for over a year.
IF it had paid Chris Malish's office it would have had an attorney at the TRIAL it lost.
IF it had a genuine argument, It would have not LOST the Bill of Review.
IF it had complied with Court ORDERS a Bench Warrant would not have been granted.
and as my grandfather used to say "IF my grandmother had testicles she would have been my Grandfather"
or "But ya ARE in that wheelchair Blance, YA ARE in the wheelchair"
Well, I see Hamou is now spinning completely out of control, taking one stab in the dark after another in trying to piece together how the sand got washed out from under her feet with that lie to the court.
She can huff and puff all she wants, but this all revolves around one central fact. Hamou had her lawyer lie to the judge on January 7 about her being in Michigan relating to care for her mother . . . and she got caught at it.
Hamou had posted a bond promising to be in court as summoned. When she failed to appear and had her lawyer lie to the court she violated the terms of her bail. If a judge sees those affidavits, he could simply decide to revoke her bail on the spot. There is no requirement of notice to her, a hearing, or anything else. Those are the conditions to which one agrees when accepting release on bail.
I know she's too stupid and too deep into her psychosis to stop herself, but this should teach her something:
The days are gone when her lies to courts and the police will pass unchallenged. Every claim she makes is going to be FULLY investigated.
She is going to be made to answer for her claims that Atchison threatened to kill her and that he had her beaten on October 22.
She has become so desperate to untangle herself from the legal net that is closing around her that she has thrown all sense and caution to the wind, even filing criminal complaints against people who can very easily prove that they were not where she said they were when she said they were doing what she said they did.
We already have proof that she perjured herself through her lawyer in court on January 7. Proof of lies she told the police is now on the way.
Those affidavits are just the beginning.
So Hamou, how is the end coming for me?? You owe me close to $30,000 by court order. I have a bench warrant for your arrest in Texas. I have localized my judgment in California and your ORAP is April 3rd. I have won every court case and hearing against you. Every judge, jury and law enforcement person who has been involved in our court battles and has heard my story is behind me, not you.
I will stand up to every lie, every manipulation you try against me. I will always win against you. Everyone figures out what you are up to in the end.
There is no end for me - just more victories against you and your lies. I will never stop my legal efforts to collect my judgment and stop you from continuously creating lies about me.
I have great lawyers, endless confidence that I will succeed in court as I have for almost ten years. If it takes ten years more, so be it.
You will soon get your chance to stand before a judge and be held to account for the lies you tell about me. get ready to be drilled in cross-examination about your lie that I had you beaten up before the TRO hearing. You will then be shut down just like you always have been in court. You have no evidence and just make this stuff up.
So, Hamou what is the end I am coming to? Tell me more.
Hamou, let Mike Newson know that I will be filing against him as a co-conspirator. He is the admin for your site and you claim he posted these rape stories and he is responsible for everything posted there. When I win my judgment I will collect from him. My attorney will be contacting him in the next few days. We will find him and serve him.
I will add Steve Lee to the lawsuit and find out if his computers, telephones, data lines or facilities have been involved. When I win my judgment I will take trucks, TVs, property, anything I can get from him. We will find him and serve him, too. Let him know.
I will add anyone else I find has been involved. You might want to warn them them all.
You know I have the assets to spend on my litigation and I will.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"impersonated a government office here in California told them he had been hired by the County of Los Angeles DA's office that he was with the Major Crimes unit"
As usual, your own spin has left you confused.
My understanding is that the affidavits were obtained at the request of and for the use of a sergeant in the Major Crimes Unit of the Los Angeles Animal Control Department, and that is where they were sent by the investigator.
Animal Control is a very busy department. It seems that they are not going to have their time wasted by showing up for court appearances in which you play your hide-and-seek games.
You hid. They sought.
And you got caught like a three-year-old with her shoes sticking out from behind the sofa.
Regarding proof that Atchison threatened her life and had her beaten, SnoopOmaSand posted:
"Not a problem since this fact is contained in legal briefs filed on my behalf"
Yeah, right. Since when has anything you claimed in one of your absurd "legal briefs" -- most of which are just posted on the internet but never seen by a judge -- won you a single round in a court against Atchison?
Your "legal brief" did not win you the original trial.
Your "legal brief" did not work for the Bill of Review.
Your "legal brief" did not save the RICO case you filed.
Your "legal brief" did not get the Texas bench warrant quashed.
Your "legal brief" did not get the Sister State Judgment set aside.
Your "legal brief" did not get a permanent restraining order issued.
Your "legal brief" did not stave off Atchison's successful motion for fees and attorney costs in the restraining order petition.
Your fantasy that just because you put something in one of your ridiculous "legal briefs" it is as good as proven is not going to serve you well in the coming actions.
You'd really better focus on finding some actual evidence for a change.
As predicted, Hamou has been screaming like a wounded banshee ever since news broke of those two affidavits.
Now it's time to step back a bit and examine the simple facts of the matter:
- Hamou (aka Alexandra McConnell) violated the terms of her bail by failing to show in court of January 7.
- She tried tried to cover her tracks by using her mother's terminal illness with cancer.
- She got caught at it when her mother and brother provided affidavits to Animal Control that she had been nowhere near her mother for a year and a half and was doing nothing regarding her mother's care.
She can blame it on Animal Control, on the District Attorney, on Bob Atchison, on some investigator someone hired, on conspirators, on unfair play, on anyone and everyone besides herself. That is what sociopathic con artists do.
But the simple, inescapable fact is that none of this would have been necessary had Hamou appeared in court on January 7 as she was required to do.
The fact that she used her mother's fatal illness as a tool for the scam on the court is despicable. But it is also entirely in keeping with her character and mode of operating.
Darlings, hello from London! Here with the sisters of my heart getting Nitzi a new wardrobe for the spring because darlings, she deserves it!
Omele, sweetness, what is this kvatch about calling your mother a liar? Darling, in the list of things a daughter can do, this ranks up there with bringing home a boy named Sean to meet the family! Also, not for anything, but your own mammele doesn't want you by her side, darling? And she hasn't seen you in two years, darling? There is a special section in you-know-where for that kind of behavior, Missy.
Tally-ho, darlings!
Remember that this is a woman who sent an email to a publicity firm right after the 9/11 attacks claiming she was almost a victim of the attacks, having flown from Boston to Los Angeles that same day on a later flight.
Of course, there were no such flights on that day.
But it shows how callously sociopathic Hamou is. She will use any tragedy -- including her own mother's -- to try to gain some perceived advantage for herself.
No one should be surprised that a woman who made such grotesquely cynical use of 9/11 would do the same thing to her own mother.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"I have never stated to any person or to the court that I was caring for my mother in the capacity of being her legal caregiver."
Moron. Is this the best you can do?
There is no such status as a "legal caregiver", and no one claims you professed to be one.
What your lawyer told the court at your behest on January 7 was that you were in Michigan on family business relating to your mother's cancer.
And, as we know from the sworn and notarized affidavits of your mother and brother, that was a lie.
SnoopOmaSand also posted:
"This firm was not hired by the County of Los Angeles Major Crimes Unit"
That's probably true. My understanding is that the affidavits were sought by a sergeant in the Major CASE Unit of Los Angeles Animal Control. At least I'm told it was that address your brother was given for mailing the affidavits.
Maybe he got Major "Crimes" Unit mixed up with Major "Case" Unit. But, no matter -- the affidavits arrived at the proper address in any case.
And, yeah. We're all waiting for the FBI's big move here on your behalf. We've been waiting for several years now.
Care to cite the statute that makes it a federal crime for a private investigator to approach someone to ask questions and to obtain a voluntary affidavit?
Nitwit.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"I do know for a fact that you . . . have on numerous occasions contacted Sgt. Montez-Kemp of the Lancaster, California Animal Control."
Wrong again, bozo. I've never talked to or corresponded with this sergeant in any way.
Actually if one just googles the investigator's name, you find her full title is Sgt. Rachel Montez-Kemp, Major Case Unit Investigator
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"He knowingly and deliberately and with malice lied, annoy, harassed and torment amongst other things a dying woman"
I see. And your brother, who is a state corrections officer, stood by and did nothing while all this was happening? And then signed an affidavit as well.
Right. You really are a moron.
SnoopOmaSand also posted:
"something to show I was not in Michigan on the 7th of January in order to cause me harm"
So maybe it was not such a good idea to have your lawyer lie to the court on January 7, huh?
So now Hamou has come to oinking on her website? Her command of English has always been limited . . . but oinking to try to express herself?
Of course, I guess she's just too frustrated to think clearly about what she's writing. Coupled with the fact that her psychosis has always prevented her from thinking two steps ahead, she has descended into utter confusion at this point.
Here's a recap of her current dilemma:
- If she maintains that she was in Michigan dealing with her mother's illness on or around January 7 as her lawyer told the court, then she is saying that her mother and brother committed perjury in signing sworn affidavits.
- If she maintains that her mother was "harassed, annoyed, tormented and caused great anxiety and pain" by an investigator, then she is saying that her brother sanctioned that treatment of his mother, first by letting it happen while he was present, and second by signing an affidavit himself that went even further than her mother's affidavit.
She seems now to be trying to get mileage out of the point that her mother and brother were presented with pre-typed affidavits to sign. Her problem is that there is nothing irregular about that, as I am told they were drafted based on information the McConnells gave in an earlier interview, and they were free to sign or not sign them.
However, I have now obtained a copy of the affidavits and noted something interesting. Her brother struck through one sentence in the prepared affidavit and initialed the change. This means two things: he read the affidavit carefully, and he felt comfortable editing it to be sure it was accurate before he signed it.
On second thought, perhaps oinking is all there is left for her to do at this point.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"the Investigator/detective hired by my stalkers produced a document which was signed by Sgt. Rachel Montez-Kemp of the Lancaster, Animal Control"
Huh? On the one hand, you say your "stalkers" hired an investigator. On the other hand you say the investigator was given a document provided by Sergeant Montez-Kemp.
So who was this investigator working for?
SnoopOmaSand then posted:
"I was arrested on December 16, 2013 for failing to appear in court . . . neither my then counsel of record and or I had appeared in court to show the court I had registered for classes concerning animals"
Interesting. But it's odd that you are pointing out how regularly you miss court appointments.
Just in the past few months, you have failed to appear for at least three court dates of which we know.
Yet it's everyone else's fault when your ass gets thrown into jail for ignoring summonses.
As I said, you really are a moron.
I wonder who it will blame when the judge revokes the $50,000 bail when he finds out he was lied to on Jan 7. The problem is a tough one for Hamou McConnell. If it proves it was in Michigan then it calls her family liars. If it can't prove that then it had its lawyer LIE. There is no third option. So just where WAS Hamou McConnell on Jan 7??
That answer should be interesting.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"I have been informed the DA is not planning to use those affidavits"
Right. This from the woman who asked Atchison on one day whether he had yet received the order the court issued quashing the Writ of Execution and canceling the debtor's exam and then two days later posted that she was going to apply to get those orders in the coming two days -- something which she has not yet done.
But keep believing it and don't show up for court on February 20.
Please.
Sorry, have been dealing with the Winter Wonderland that is New York right now. Lost power out on the Island, so have come back into the city for the weekend.
The strangest thing about her posts these past couple of days? Her repeated bleats that the affidavits aren't fair, as though (1) she is playing some kind of cricket match with the people she has bilked and (2) she has even the vaguest idea of what the word 'fair' means.
Here's the deal, girlfriend. The people and organizations you have defrauded and or hurt are coming after you with every weapon in the arsenal of the law. Were you fair when you took advantage of Don Morton's age? Were you fair when you squatted in and did a fair amount of destruction to the houses owned by Huiko Batchelor and Eric Cowan? Were you fair when you swindled Hamid Refai out of his money? When you refused to pay Bob Atchison what you owed him and instead unleashed a storm of invective for years on the internet before being called on it? Were you fair to Variety, American Express and that poor woman you just took to the cleaners after she cleaned up after your mess? Were you fair to the cats and dogs who suffered under your "care"? How about when you tried to sell property that wasn't yours? Were you fair to the series of lawyers you stiffed, or to the latest one, the man who got up and told the court an untruth regarding your whereabouts?
With any luck, this will play out like a board game, though. You will not pass go, you will not collect two hundred dollars, and you will go directly to jail.
RJ
Hamou is in a tweeting frenzy over on Twitter about being caught in a lie to the court.
So much for her claim that the court will not see those affidavits. She's in a complete panic.
Not that it will matter to the judge, anyway, but what she doesn't know is that those affidavits were obtained at the behest of Animal Control, and an officer will be in court to say so.
And if the investigator did tell Hamou's mother about an arrest warrant, she was arrested on December 16 on a warrant, and there is an outstanding warrant for her arrest in Texas, and Hamid Refai did get a warrant for her arrest in California, and there was a warrant in the LAX sheriff station for her arrest -- all for failures to answer court orders to appear.
So where's the lie in telling her family she has had arrest warrants issued against her? Of course, all that can be explained to the judge, if he even wants to know. (Actually, it would be great if she opened this issue up so that the prosecutor could get all that information before the judge. It would just dig her hole deeper.)
Hamou's brother is a Michigan corrections officer and knows how criminals operate. It would seem from his willingness to sign the affidavit he has no interest in helping cover her lies to the court.
No matter what Hamou thinks the investigator told him, her brother was completely free to refuse even to talk to the investigator, much less to sign an affidavit.
Hamou knows it and a judge will know it, but she is just throwing any shit she can get her hands on at the wall trying to work out her own frustration at being caught red-handed in a lie to the court.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"The detective in Michigan will be turning over all communications sent to him by you freaks"
Right.
I don't know who communicated what to that detective, but he won't turn over anything without a court order.
Good luck with that.
In response to my post that Hamou was arrested on December 16 on a warrant, she posted:
"I was arrested for failing to appear in court as neither my attorney or I appeared."
Uh, yeah. What's your point?
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"I am not worried not one bit but you should be!"
Well, we'll just have to wait to see what Thursday brings.
Meantime, I'm having a good enough time. Hope you are. :)
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"He will turn over all communications, emails and or faxes included, phone records and payment history as well as a copy of any reports and any other information and yes, it will all be done by a court order."
Before you waste too much money (or too many check blanks from closed accounts), you should read up on Michigan law regarding private investigations.
And we've said it before, but you need to craft your lies a little more carefully.
You just posted a few minutes ago that the investigator might have already turned over his records, and now you admit that a court order is required.
Obviously, no court order had yet been obtained. So once again, you're spinning your lies on the fly and getting all tangled up in the line.
SnoopOmaHamou posted:
"it will all be done by a court order."
Well, you might want to ask the court not to use invisible ink this time.
No one has been able to read those court orders that
- quashed the Writ of Execution
- canceled the debtor's exam
- quashed the Texas bench warrant
- set aside the Sister State Judgment.
Yes in the last month it has bleated about court orders That HAD been issued and were on the way. Except nothing ever arrived and no Court has a record of a single one. The only exist on the now delusional mind of Hamou McConnell
It bleated "I have a very good reason why I did not make the flight to Michigan and that is all that matters "
Actually since it wasn't ON a flight to Michigan there is no excuse for failing to appear on Court pursuant to Court Order. The only thing that matters will be the Judge all over it like a hound dog on a rib roast for lying.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"the FBI can and will be able to get those documents I have listed on this forum"
Is this the same FBI that, according to you, has been investigating us for years and has been about to pounce for years . . . but from whom none of us has ever heard a peep?
And never will.
Nothing makes us more sure that you're dead in the water -- and know it -- than when you start rattling that limp saber about the police or the FBI handling the matter.
Why you think it works or even sounds remotely plausible can only be explained by a combination of your desperation and your insanity.
But keep it up. It still makes for good entertainment.
You are taking a restraining order out on behalf of your family in Michigan? How exactly does that work, sweetheart?
Also, nice going on the allegation that people are taking monetary bribes to pursue you. You just don't get it, do you, girlfriend? People are "pursuing" you because you owe them money, or you have defamed them, or you have caused animals to suffer and die. Of course, the crap about the woman taking a bribe means that she's after you on a two-fer.
There is a very real possibility that you are going to be in jail by the end of this month.
Rebecca
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"I have a legitimate excuse for not being on a plane bound for the state of Michigan on January 7, 2014"
The problem is that your lawyer told the court you were IN Michigan on January 7, not that you were planning on going to Michigan.
And you will also have to explain why you had to make that trip on January 7 instead of a date when you were not under an order to appear in court, especially with those affidavits that attest you were not needed for your mother's care.
Good luck.
SnoopOmaSand also posted:
"I will be asking the court based on recent developments to issue a restraining so neither Bob Atchison or anyone else connected to him can go to my Mother's residence"
Well, unless you are going to get the courts and the legislature to rewrite the rules on standing, you're going to have to have your mother's Power of Attorney.
And we all know that you're more likely to get a Learjet for Christmas.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"One last thing about Sgt. Rachel Montez-Kemp it has been alleged she took a money bribe with respect to me"
That's a nice way to get the attention of the officer who is trying to put you away for animal abuse.
You really, really are a moron.
Amazing. They must indeed have superpowers to have persuaded your brother and mother to have signed affidavits about you without so much as calling you beforehand. It's almost as though your family wasn't surprised to learn that you were making false claims.
But no, undoubtedly there was a hypnotic placed in their soup by Bob Atchison, whose powers know no bounds.
Your loving family indeed.
RJ
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"about Sgt. Rachel Montez Kemp . . . this about the bribe that was discussed during proceedings that took place last year"
Yep, and what was the outcome?
Was she charged? Was she arrested? Was she told to back off and leave you alone?
She deals with animal hoarders for a living. Any judge is going to know that such nutjobs will throw any shit at the fan they can when caught.
And, Rebecca . . . your point was very well taken about why her brother wouldn't have called her to let her know a detective had contacted the family, he had interviewed them, and they had agreed to sign affidavits that they knew were going to be used in court against her.
I can think of only one reason I would sign such an affidavit against one of my siblings without letting them know I had been asked.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"Let's get something straight, the hearing on the 29th is about showing the court proof of having enrolled in classes"
Let's get something else straight. There is no February 29 this year. And if there were, it would be a Saturday.
The hearing is on the 20th.
Of course, this is probably Hamou's new strategy for ducking a court date -- to claim that she got the court dates mixed up.
Just like she claims that she keeps accidentally picking up the wrong check book. Over and over and over.
And let's get something else straight. If the only problem were that Hamou had just forgotten to send the court proof that she had obeyed the probation terms by attending some class, her lawyer would have gotten that certificate to a clerk and the hearing would have been canceled.
The real problem is that the court last summer ordered Hamou not to keep any more animals, and she was found on December 16 with 96 animals in her possession and arrested because an outstanding warrant was found when they ran her ID through the system.
Even if the court date were only about attending some class, it still begs the question: why didn't Hamou comply with the court order to attend the class in the first place?
We know the answer, of course. She NEVER obeys court orders: not to appear for driving infractions, not to pay judgments, not to comply with probation terms, not to meet bail conditions, not to file bankruptcy schedules, not to attend debtors exams, not to meet filing deadlines.
She's a serial con artist. It's how they operate.
You're not being "fair", Blake.
Thursday's Child
Hickory, dickory, dock
We sit and watch the clock
The clock strikes one
Hamou is done
Hickory, dickory, dock
24 hours and counting now. So many questions...
Will it show up in Court?
If not, will the Judge issue another BENCH WARRANT?
or
Will it have the lawyer show up and lie to the Court again and if so will the Judge actually buy it again?
or not and ISSUE THE BENCH WARRANT.
If it does show, will it be insanely shouting and screaming at the Judge again pretending to have hearing loss from a beating? Will that go over well?
Will it accuse LA County Animal Control of taking bribes? Will that go over well?
Will the Judge send it to jail for violating the terms of probation which is now revoked?
Will the Judge revoke Bail for being lied to?
All shall be answered in good time. Yes, all shall be answered.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"I am just glad your web postings and actions against me and his are going to be used in future litigation proceedings"
Here we go again with those tired old promises of "future litigation" that she's been promising for years.
I wonder what couturier she will honor tomorrow with her choice of clothing to cover that $3 million ass.
And I do hope she can find a clean pair of shoes.
By the way, has anyone heard from that private investigator in Michigan?
Has he been served with the court order yet?
Has the FBI seized his correspondence?
Time's a-wasting, as Hamou's lawyer's going to need it by tomorrow morning.
It always amuses me when it posts as "Snoopy". That’s exactly what psychotic sociopaths do to intimidate their victims and we all know how barking mad it is. Without doubt it is giving the world a demonstration as to its mental illnesses and criminal intent.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"this monster [Atchison] didn't attach any evidence to his lawsuit"
It seems that unlike Hamou, Atchison has lawyers who know the difference between a pleading, a brief, and a trial.
Maybe Richman can help Hamou prepare for trial, since he's been so adept at getting his own lawsuit off the ground -- if you can call three strikes and still trying "adept".
This lawsuit should be fun. We'll finally get to see the proof that Atchison threatened Hamou's life, that he had Hamou beaten on October 22, that she was raped and lost a baby as a result of internet postings, and all the other nonsense she has claimed.
Looks like I'll be seeing Oma and Mike Newson in court soon. I will win again. Then I'll will have damages from both of them. It will be much easier to collect from Mike and Virginia Newson.
Blake, you'd think Oma would be thrilled to have a chance to prove all the lies about me she has been posting in her forum. "Mike Newson" has posted his eagerness to support Oma, here's his chance as well. They can bring in all the witnesses they want. What do they have to be afraid of? More smiley faces for Oma, more chances to thank God when I win again
So, what evidence did it ever attach to the civil restraining order which was dismissed? The RICO complaint that was dismissed? It's bankruptcy? The complaints filed with Munoz? The complaint filed about the fictional beating before the CRO hearing ? NOTHING!!! Yet it now bleats complaint? Typical con artist BS.
Is she a show or a blow in court today?
Today's Court report:
Hamou was obviously lying the other day when she said her attorney talked to the DA, and the DA was not going to make use of the affidavits signed by her mother and brother.
Hamou had no attorney and asked the court to appoint her one. (I wonder he she failed to pay the last one or if he bailed once he found out she had him lie to the court -- or both.)
The DA did introduce the affidavits which the judge saw but said he could not admit into evidence.
A hearing has been set for March 13. The judge now knows what she's about. The fact that he has appointed a public defender for her indicates that this case is about far more than failing to submit a class attendance certificate.
Also, Hamou was served with the new lawsuit shortly after the hearing. She went ballistic, claiming she had a ticket for the trip to Michigan, but the flight was canceled due to weather; that she was beaten up; and that she has melanoma.
In other words, same old, same old.
Now begins the countdown to the 13th.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"Bob forgot the statue of limitations for defamation with respect to Mike Newson"
And Hamou forgot that Newson is being sued in his role as site administrator and moderator of her forum, which makes him responsible for defamatory statements made quite recently. So the Woman Who Sued Herself is once again confused.
SnoopOmaSand also posted:
"I am just so happy, thrilled . . . to file my own $2.5 million dollar defamation/stalking etc. counter suit"
Okay, the Woman Who Sued Herself sinks deeper into confusion. She is professing to be poised to file her third bankruptcy petition. As she should remember from her dud of a RICO lawsuit, once she files for bankruptcy, she loses the right to pursue any personal causes of action in her own right. Only a bankruptcy trustee would be able to sue Atchison.
And once the trustee becomes acquainted with her and her affairs, that's about as likely as a sleet storm in Hell.
Lord, the woman is dense.
Court Reporter - thank you for the update. Looking forward to your next report.
SnoopOmaSand posted regarding the affidavits:
"Because I was supposed to have been given legal notice"
There is no requirement of legal notice to use affidavits in this situation. The judge declined to accept them in evidence because of hearsay rules. What is interesting is that there is an exception to hearsay rules for out-of-jurisdiction evidence submitted by a person who is too ill to travel, as Hamou's mother is.
What this most likely means is that the judge is looking ahead to the likely outcome of this case, which could mean jail time for Hamou, and is erring on the side of caution to be sure she has no remotely colorable grounds for appeal.
Well, Oma and Mike, I said I would not put up with your lies anymore. I told you to warn Mike. You just kept on with the lies - creating even more.
I will easily win my case and you and Newson know it. You are both going to be stopped by the courts. We know all the tricks you will try and pull. Go ahead and try.
Newson will have to hire an attorney and when I get my judgment I will collect from him. I hope you have explained to him what's at stake here and how I have won every time against you in court.
It's over for you and Mike Newson - the lies will stop and you both will have to pay for what you have done.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"perhaps she [Sgt. Montez-Kemp] can enlighten us as to her conversation today if any with my stalkers and all other communications as well as provide phone numbers and names and such because as a defendant in a criminal case, I am entitled under the law to have all pertinent discovery information"
Just how many legal points can one woman get wrong inside of an hour?
Hamou has no right to a law enforcement officer's phone logs in this situation.
But let's hope she asks for them. She needs to keep racking up bills for court sanctions such as those she got when she tried to get discovery on Atchison's computer traffic.
Blake:
I am sure she won't have an attorney in my lawsuit against her and when I win the huge judgment against them both she will never pay a dime of it.
On the other hand Newson has assets that I can attach and go after in Utah. Having nothing to loose Oma will run again but he can't. Newson will be left paying the damages.
AND ---
this lawsuit is not just about the financial damages. There's a lot more in there.
Atchison posted:
"Newson will be left paying the damages."
Nothing new there. It's the same thing that happened to Don Morton in the American Express lawsuit.
Oh, my dears. Melanoma!
What a horrible ghastly disease to pretend have. I am just pretend sick with pretend worry over Ms. Hamou / McConnell / Murphy / Moran / Hanoi.
And what a year the poor, poor dear has had. There was that infection that left her with just weeks to live. Then that beating that left her eyesight and hearing impaired and unable to attend court. Then her mother's bout with brain cancer that caused her to pretend plan a pretend trip to Michigan to pretend care for her just as another court date rolled around. And now melanoma!
How does she hold up? I ask you -- how?
Darlings! Such excitement! And no, darlings, not Kiev! Something really serious! Darling Omele may have to declare bankruptcy! Oh, the misery! The agony! The sense of deja vu! Kind of the way darling Mischele Newson must have felt when he was served, darlings! As darling Michael Corleone once said, "just when I thought I was out, they pull me back in, darlings!" (Well, the "darling" is mine, darlings, but you get the point!)
And darling Omele, your own public defender, darling! And a moment while we all try and imagine what that poor schlemiel's life is going to be like during the next few weeks. You just know our Darling Girl is never, ever going to show up to meet with him. Hoo hah, the tsuris he's in for, darlings!
And now pretend melanoma, darling? You should be an exhibit for the JAMA, darling! What's next up for you in the fake illness department? Leprosy? Just like darling Haya Harareet in Ben-Hur, darling! And whatever happened to her?
So I'm sure darling Mischele and his wife (especially his wife, whom I am sure is a lovely person, darlings, or at least a long-suffering individual!) were thrilled when you bubbled back up in their lives like a dead body floating to the surface. It's always a treat to see old friends, isn't it?
So excited for you, darling. So excited!
Mitzi
Here is a fuller report of yesterday's events at the courthouse:
Hamou asked for headphones in the courtroom due to her "hearing loss". On a couple of occasions, though, she had to take them off to better hear what was being said.
Then, when she was served in the parking lot with the lawsuit, she engaged in a lengthy conversation with the process server during which she had no problem at all hearing what he said in a normal tone of voice.
During that conversation with the process server, she started rattling on about bench warrants, explaining her view of the difference between criminal and civil bench warrants. She referred to the bench warrant for failing to appear for her debtor's exam as a "schmutz warrant" that was "no big deal". (We think a judge will find that quite interesting when the time comes for him to hear it.)
As for events in the courtroom, it was clear that she is in more trouble than just not attending a class. In fact, she told the judge she had proof of class enrollment with her. The judge did not even ask to see it and continued the hearing, noting that she was also charged with a probation violation for possessing animals.
Regarding the affidavits, the contents of which the DA did discuss with the judge, the judge said he would sometimes accept them in lieu of personal testimony. But he added that as this case involved possible bail forfeiture and remand into custody for probation violations, he would require that the witnesses be present.
The judge appointed a public defender for Hamou and set the next hearing for March 13.
In wrapping up, the judge reminded Hamou that she had been told by him in June that she could possess no animals. Yet in the parking lot, Hamou -- who for some odd reason seemed to want to try her various cases before the process server -- told the him that she had paid someone to take care of "her" animals.
In other words, she admitted that she was in possession of animals in defiance of the court's order.
Darling Court Reporter, she described it as a schmutz warrant!?! Darling Omele, forget trying to prove that kvatch about how Russian and Native American you are, sweetness!# You're obviously Ashkenazy, darling girl! Listen to you with the Yiddish, darling! You're like a character from Yentl! And darlings, can we talk about darling Barbra for a moment in that movie? Your two choices for love are Amy Irving and that darling Mandy Patinkin whose cheeks I could pinch for hours and instead you choose books? Oy, Babs, what are you thinking? As my cousin the tragically single Muriel Weiss always says. "all of that and she gets James Brolin too?! Babs has the life, Mitzele!" To which I can only say "Doesn't she, Muriel? Doesn't she? And darling, do you really need another piece of kugel?"
But so do you, Omele! So do you!
Oma Hamou McConnell's brother has confessed in court to murdering his girlfriend.
http://www.battlecreekenquirer.com/article/20140221/NEWS01/302210032/Officer-Albion-man-confessed-killing-girlfriend
Let's get some perspective here. Hamou is still ranting that someone hired:
"a private detective to go to my home and harass, torment, annoy and lie to a dying woman"
First, no one harassed or tormented anyone. My understanding is that Mrs. McConnell called her son when the detective approached her, he came over, and they both freely agreed to have a lengthy discussion with the investigator.
Second, Hamou had not been to see her mother for a year and a half. Yet, on exactly the day she had a court appearance, she suddenly had to get to Michigan to see her mother. Right.
Third, Michael Kraut did not tell the court on January 7 that Hamou was "on the way" to Michigan. He told the court that she was "in" Michigan.
Hamou has been playing games with courts for years. Leaving aside for the moment her failure to appear in the Refai lawsuit and her numerous no-shows in the actions involving Bob Atchison and her bankruptcy petition, she has over a dozen default judgments against her for failure to appear. She has had bench warrants for non-appearance issued in California. She has a bench warrant outstanding in Texas for non-appearance.
And when cornered, she has told courts lie after lie.
She wrote the playbook for this game.
When an opposing party decides to adapt to her strategy, she screeches and snorts like a stuck pig.
SnoopOmaSand also posted:
"I have filed a criminal complaint against Sgt. Rachel Montez-Kemp"
Now there's a clever strategy.
Except that:
- there is nothing criminal about engaging a private investigator to have an interview with someone
- only Mrs. McConnell would be able to file a criminal complaint about something supposedly done to her
- it will cement even further with the police their impression that Hamou is bat shit crazy.
Of course, we are dealing here with the Woman Who Sued Herself.
There is also this interesting fact. My mother has been dead for awhile, but I am pretty sure that if a person had showed up with information like this about me and asked for an affidavit, she wouldn't have signed without calling me first. Or been as willing to believe this about her daughter (to say nothing of her brother about his sister) without question. But those were the Jordans. Perhaps the McConnells roll differently?
RJ
The Mosheins would never have even SPOKEN to anyone about me like that, without first speaking with me about it, much less sign anything.
Let's examine how certifiably nuts Hamou is regarding filing a "criminal complaint" about this interview of her mother and brother by a private investigator:
First:
There is nothing illegal about an investigator asking to interview someone and then doing so when the interviewee agrees.
Second:
Based on what Hamou herself claims the interviewer said, he neither lied nor committed any crime in what he told her mother and brother.
Third:
Any supposed "crime" would have been committed in Michigan, and no California law enforcement agency would have jurisdiction over the act, the venue, or the individuals.
Fourth:
No prosecution for this supposed "crime" could occur without Mrs. McConnell's being subpoenaed to appear in court. By claiming she has filed criminal complaints in California, Hamou is basically saying that she is okay with subjecting her terminally-ill mother to a forced appearance in a California courtroom. (Of course, since psychopaths care nothing about anyone other than themselves and their problems, this would be no biggie to her.)
Fifth:
There is no need to worry about Mrs. McConnell's having to make the trip, because the police -- if Hamou even filed any "complaints" -- would not bother to investigate a matter over which they have no jurisdiction.
Sixth:
Rebecca and Rob are absolutely right. None of our parents would agree to an interview in the first place, then voluntarily sign affidavits against our interests, and then fail even to let us know about it.
Nothing Mrs. McConnell or Keith McConnell heard from the investigator came as a surprise.
They had no interest in letting her know it was going on, as they have long since had enough of what they termed her "drama".
Their only interest was in telling the truth as they knew it.
Seventh
Hamou is out of her mind.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"If this does not happen and neither my attorney or I are notified"
Let's review your history with attorneys, shall we?
You have been sued by at least three of your own attorneys and lost all three cases.
Beyond those three attorneys, Shane Boasberg asked the judge to allow him to withdraw from representing you, telling the judge you were "uncooperative" with him.
Baruch Cohen dropped you as a client when you refused to cooperate with him in filling out the bankruptcy schedules he had informed the court and opposing counsel he was going to produce.
Michael Kraut made a single appearance on your behalf and found himself lying to the court at your behest. He disappeared as quickly as Cohen.
Your newest attorney is a Public Defender, as you are unable to obtain counsel on your own.
SnoopOmaSand also posted:
"a private investigator in Michigan who has provided you with my family's phone numbers and you are contacting them"
No one here is contacting your family. Either you are deliberately lying or you are just guessing and have thereby inadvertently revealed that your family is not talking to you about this.
SnoopOmaSand also posted:
"I am a defendant in a criminal matter with respect to my animals"
It's astonishing that you keep admitting that they were your animals, since the judge reminded you last week that he had specifically ordered you in July to have no animals. You are so insane that you don't even realize the implications of what you are posting.
SnoopOmaSand also posted:
"my family will testify under oath"
So you are going to haul your mother from Michigan to testify in the California criminal proceedings the police are bringing on your behalf, huh?
SnoopOmaSand also posted:
"My mother and brother signed an affidavit because they were told it was needed by the Major Crimes Unit in Los Angeles"
Your brother is a law enforcement officer, and he was with your mother both during the interview (which occurred well before your other brother was arrested for murder) and for the signing of the affidavits. He knew very well that the private detective had no means to compel him either to agree to the interview or to sign the affidavits. Your brother did so entirely voluntarily, as did your mother with your brother's concurrence.
SnoopOmaSand:
"you took advantage of her [Hamou's mother]"
Yeah, so says the woman who used her own mother's terminal illness as a ploy to duck a probation violation hearing.
Hamou is still over on her site, ranting and spewing profanity.
I guess she hasn't adjusted to the new reality.
In the past, getting away with her cons has depended on finding victims who could not, either by reasons of age, health, or finances, sustain their causes of action against her constant bobbing and weaving.
But now she's getting matched move for move.
She files a Bill of Review, and Atchison begins collections proceedings against her for his judgment, resulting in contempt rulings, sanctions, and a bench warrant.
She pulls a house purchase scam on Patrick O'Connor, and a Writ of Execution is issued to allow Bob Atchison to attach the escrow deposit she made.
She files for bankruptcy and gets challenged, causing her petition to be dismissed.
She files false allegations in order to get a TRO, and Bob Atchison flies from Texas to Los Angeles to appear, causing her to stay out of the courtroom and get her petition dismissed.
She lies to a court in January about why she failed to appear, and a private investigator is put on the case and reveals her lie to the court.
She posts that she was raped and lost a baby due to these blogs, and she is being sued for defamation.
She claims that Bob Atchison had her beaten on October 22 and, besides being sued for defamation, she will be pursued for filing a false police report.
The old days of pulling off a con and then disappearing are gone.
And as the line of her victims gets longer and longer, a steady stream of information on her whereabouts and newest cons just keeps on flowing in to us.
Bob has specialized lawyers on retainer and ready to follow her into family court (Lewis), into bankruptcy court (Wegman), into federal district court (Menthe), and into state civil and criminal courts (Borgelt, et al.).
And what does Hamou have? A public defender.
And I'm sure he's a real mensch, darling Blakele!
My goodness, darlings! Poor darling Omele is up against it now, isn't she?
Darling, will your Public Defender put all of your frivolous lawsuits into motion, or will you have to do it yourself? Also, darling, not for anything, but darling Jackele Dadele looks just like you, but with better hair. It's sort of like me and darling Bitsy, although without the whole "we're also criminals" part of the relationship.
As I look back at Hamou's posts over the past few days, the depth of her delusion telegraphs clearly through.
After a hearing last week in which the prosecutor told the judge that he had affidavits proving she lied about her January 7 appearance and in which the judge clearly told her she could be in jeopardy of incarceration at the March 13 hearing, she came out of the courtroom declaring victory.
Since when is having a judge tell you that you might be remanded into custody at the next hearing any kind of victory?
And does she really think the FBI is going to do anything about a couple of people voluntarily talking to a private investigator and giving him affidavits which they knew were to be turned over to law enforcement and a prosecutor?
And does she really think the police in California are going to investigate an Animal Control Sergeant for turning those affidavits over to the prosecutor?
And does she really think that the judge, after hearing testimony that she was found in a house with 96 animals after his imposing a probation requirement that she have no animals, is going to buy her claim that she lives in Burbank and was just having the animals housed in Lake Los Angeles?
We saw the pictures of the excrement all over the floor and the Animal Control people in HazMat suits and respirators. Who does she think is going to believe that a someone else lets his house get into such condition -- not to mention himself violating criminal codes by keeping so many animals -- by keeping someone else's animals?
Either she is just lying to posture, or she is stark raving mad . . . or most likely both.
Hamou/McConnell bleated: "Go to hell you son of a bitch as the court told me to place my animals with someone else"
Not at all. The Judge's EXACT WORDS were "Do not possess any animals". That is precisely what the Court record states.
It doesn't say "Place them with someone else." It states Do NOT POSSESS any animals.
Possess
verb (used with object)
1.to have as belonging to one; have as property; own:
The Court ordered her that she can not OWN any animals, where ever they may be.
Can't you just imagine that conversation?
The phone rings:
Oma:
Hi, this is Oma. I have a little problem and need someone to keep my animals for a while. Can you do it?
Steve Lee:
But, Oma, you already live here.
Oma:
No, I don't. Remember, I live in Burbank. In B-U-R-B-A-N-K. How many times do we have to go over this?
Steve Lee:
Oh, right. Okay, then. No problem with the animals. How many are there?
Oma:
96.
Steve Lee:
Come again.
Oma:
96. But they're really well behaved. They won't give you any trouble at all. One might even be dead.
Steve Lee:
But I don't know where I'd put that many animals. You've seen our . . . , er, my house.
Oma:
Don't worry. There's plenty of room. They'll just make themselves at home any old place. They can sleep four or five deep.
Steve Lee:
What about feeding them?
Oma:
They're animals. They'll fend for themselves. And look at it this way -- you won't have to wash any more dishes.
Steve Lee:
But how do I let that many animals out to potty?
Oma:
Oh, you don't have to bother with that. Just let them go wherever they are. That's what I do.
Steve Lee:
But what about the filth and the stench?
Oma:
I haven't noticed any. I doubt you will, either.
Steve Lee:
I don't know, Oma. This sounds like a big mess to me.
Oma:
I have a $3 million ass.
Steve Lee:
(muttering) What you need is a $300 dentist.
Oma:
What was that?
Steve Lee:
Nothing. I just had to burp. So, right. Bring 'em on over.
So Hamou is claiming that the judge never told her she was in peril of incarceration, huh?
Well, here were his exact words about four and half minutes into the hearing:
"If she's in possession of animals, Ms. McConnell that is in violation of an order and that the bonds be forfeited and she is remanded for higher processes."
(There was some confusion of address as the judge was alternately speaking to Hamou, her lawyer, and the prosecutor during this statement.)
Bond is posted in order to secure release from jail. When bond is declared forfeit by a court, that means bond is revoked and the person is returned to jail.
Of course, Hamou is just pretending not to know this, as she's an old hand at being tossed into jail and signing bail arrangements.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"I was told to place my animals in the care and custody of others and that is what I did"
I doubt if the court will view your claim that Steve Lee became the custodian of your 96 animals as very credible, since he has been your housemate for years, and you were in the house when Animal Control arrived.
But give it a whirl. You don't have any other defense.
On the other hand, if you manage to convince a judge that Steve Lee was the custodian of the animals, then Animal Control can go after him for code violations for having 96 animals on his premises.
He wouldn't be the first friend you've thrown under the bus.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"This is a complete fabrication told by someone who wasn't even present in the court room."
Says who?
And since I heard what the judge said and she apparently didn't (perhaps because of those silly headphones that were props for her little drama), I would say that I was more present than she was.
And remember that she heard just fine outside the courtroom without any headphones.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"that person's license is being run by law enforcement"
Yeah, right. Law enforcement runs the plates of process servers for doing their jobs.
Do let us know the name that comes back on the plate, though.
SnoopOmaSand also posted:
"You weren't present"
Oh, wasn't I?
While waiting for your case to be called you were sitting in the aisle seat on the second row, right behind a large black man and in front of a heavyset blond woman. You were wearing flared-bottom jeans with worn edges and were working on an electronic pad or something like it. Your upper left front tooth is missing.
When your case was called, you went to a podium on the left side of the courtroom. Your court-appointed lawyer, a heavyset man with graying hair and glasses, approached the bench by passing behind you around your left side and then came to stand to your right. You patted him on the back and later grabbed his upper left arm when talking to him.
You had to sign papers on the spot to substitute your court-appointed attorney for Michael Kraut.
After a short recap of the case by the judge there was a discussion about whether the judge would hear from Animal Control on or off the record. The issue was whether to proceed to trial on the probation violation on the spot or to schedule a hearing for later. After reviewing the docket the judge realized the person who actually found you in the home with all your animals was not present to testify. The prosecutor decided to be on the record, so Sgt. Montez (who did not use her hyphenated name) had to spell her name for the record before addressing the court. There was an agreement that the witness for the state would be there on March 13 to testify.
In telling you to be back in court on March 13 for what the judge referred to as the "actual" hearing, the judge told you that there would be no further written notice to you or your attorney. He asked, "do you understand and agree", to which you replied "yes".
The judge wrapped up by reminding you that you were to have no animals, that he had told you that in July, and that you had agreed which was the reason for your receiving probation instead of an active sentence. He told you again that you were to have no animals.
You have posted that the hearing was only about whether you attended "animal care" classes. In fact, that is not true. Moreover, twice during the hearing the judge referred to "animal cruelty" classes, but never to "animal care" classes.
Still think I wasn't there?
See you on the 13th.
Oh, my dears. It's happened again. I take a little trip and come back to find that Ms. Hamou / McConnell / Murphy / Moran / Hanoi has been up to the most interesting things.
I was reading her recent posts to Betty Ford (or whatever her name is), and we were so very drawn in. And, yes, Betty is back in the picture. Ever since Mr. A. disappeared, the watercress funds have been a little thin, and Betty (owhni) has one of those very handy discount cards at the local liq -- er, grocery store. And when have I ever been one to hold a grudge, my pets, when it comes to friendship?)
Anyhoo -- we found it so touching that Ms. H / M / M / M / H was planning a surprise visit to her mother after such a long hiatus. I have to say that at first Betty (owhni) did not really believe Ms. H / M / M / M / H's story, as she felt no one would purchase a plane ticket without letting the people you were visiting know you were coming.
But I told Betty (owhni) that I used to do it all the time when I traveled with Mr. A. We just found that people were so surprised to find us on their doorsteps that they hardly knew what to say. And we had had such a run of bad luck in trying to schedule visits ahead of time, because it just seemed that our friends and family always had plans that made our visits inopportune. And then they would end up feeling just horrible about not being able to see us.
We found that our luck just go so much better when we showed up unannounced.
So I know exactly how Ms. H / M / M / M / H felt. She wanted to surprise her ill mother and not cause her all the trouble of getting ready for her visit and then doing something silly such as locking the front door and losing the key. (Lordy, if you knew how scatter-brained my family can be about such things.)
I am sure that if Mrs. McConnell and that dear Keith McConnell had known that Ms. H / M / M / M / H had been planning a trip to Michigan, they would have mentioned it to the investigator.
Well, tschuß, my dears. I've got to lay out the afternoon sandwiches.
Mrs. P.
You are on to something, Penelope (although you may not know it).
If Hamou really did have a plane ticket to go visit her mother in Michigan, Keith and Nola McConnell would have known about her plans and would certainly have told the investigator about them, since they knew the information was going to be given to a prosecutor.
Once again, Hamou proves what an inept liar she is.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"Mr. Kraut did speak with my brother Keith"
Yeah, and then he promptly dropped you as a client.
SnoopOmaSand also claimed some of what I saw and heard in the courtroom did not happen. Well, I guess that's what she gets for wearing headphones.
She then posted:
"your [sic] the guy who served me with legal documents from the law firm of Mr. Wegman and if that is the case I am going to make certain you will not be allowed inside the court room on the 13th of March!"
Good luck with that. One judge has already told you that public hearings are just that: public.
But here's my favorite from today's insanity:
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"the DA didn't even know about the affidavits until the day of the hearing"
Really? I guess you forgot that shortly after you first found out about the affidavits, you posted that your lawyer had talked to the DA about them and been assured he would not make any use of them, as they had supposedly been obtained "illegally".
So, once again, you get tangled up in your own web, telling a lie today that is inconsistent with the lie you told yesterday.
As I said, you are an incredibly inept liar.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"Did you or someone else connected to Bob Atchison or Bob himself call my brother and he confirmed what I had said? Of course, I already know the answer to this question"
Your desperate and transparent fishing to find out who is or is not talking to your brother only shows that your brother is not forthcoming with information you want.
I know subtlety is not your strong suit, but you could at least try.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"you will not be able to enter any courtroom which requires my presence"
And there have been so many.
Good luck.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"Now why wouldn't my brother not speak to me you moron!"
I see that the effect of double negatives still eludes you.
Perhaps you meant to ask either "why would my brother not speak to me", or "why wouldn't my brother speak to me".
However, the double negative leaves you asking, in effect, "why would my brother speak to me".
And we know the answer to that question: you're too big a heaping of drama.
Dimwit.
And I forgot to add . . . since you had no inkling of the affidavits until I posted about them here, we know your brother wasn't speaking to you enough to let you know he and your mother had been approached by an investigator, that they agreed to sign affidavits, and that they had, in fact, signed them -- a process which I understand occurred over several weeks.
Darling Omele, sweetness, I'm just curious. Why didn't your brother or mother try to reach you before they signed the affidavits? Sweetness, do they have your number? Clearly they had no idea that their missing girl was flying to her darling mammele's side that fateful day when the darling weather g-ds conspired against you to stop it! Darling, is it a good idea to suddenly pop up after two years and surprise a sick woman like that? Especially when she is already dealing with darling Jackele Dalele and all the mischegoss You-With-Better-Hair seems to have caused? Also, darling, what's with the missing tooth, Snagglepuss? I mean, I've been telling you for years to slap some warpaint on before you go out, but darling, all the rouge in the world isn't going to help it is you look like darling Gabby Hayes when you smile!
Posting because I care, darling. Because I care!
Mitzi
But darling, you were the one posting and tweeting that darling mammele was deathly ill for months! Sweetness, don't you remember? Or is it like your pesky closed accounts that you are always writing checks against?
Darling, I feel for your family because, oy, ONE of you was probably enough and they got a double-dip, My own children are so perfect that it hurts, darling, so I can't really imagine the pain you must have caused your mamma with all of the made-up nonsense about being Russian and Indian, excuse me, Native American, to say nothing of not coming home to see the woman who gave you life, darling. I only occasionally have to remind my own darling offspring that I went through 63 1/2 hours of labor pains for them collectively, but who's counting?
It bleated: "My brother has always had my phone number"
Well "having it" and USING IT are two totally different things.
Clearly, he never USED it to tell her about the affidavits.
That's the important bit...
Sometimes Hamou gets so confused in her posts that it's hard to figure out why she even tries.
Regarding her claims that her family keeps her informed of things, she has posted:
"Because the detective hired by you freaks lied to them and told them that he was working with the County of Los Angeles Major Crimes Unit"
For starters, you are wrong. My understanding is that your brother initially said that he wanted to mail the affidavits himself so that he would know where they were going, and he was given the name and address of Sgt. Rachel Montez-Kemp of the Major Case Unit of Animal Control. No one ever said anything about Major Crimes unit of Los Angeles, no matter how many times you repeat it.
In any case, no matter what the investigator said, your brother knew he was free to call you to alert you to what was going on. He CHOSE not to do so.
Hamou also posted regarding her mother's illness:
"I didn't know she was that sick"
Well, that hardly helps your argument that you stay in close touch with your family.
Hamou also posted:
"I invoke my legal right to remain silent"
Something you have done several times in the past few days, always in the middle of a post where you are doing anything but remaining silent.
Apparently the definition of the word "silent" eludes you as much as do double negatives and contractions.
Hamou also posted:
"Mr. Kraut did speak to my brother"
I assume this was before Mr. Kraut quit speaking to you?
And your darling brother, or as I like to think of him, the normal one, immediately believed that you were lying in court? You're right, darling! He does know you!
And not for anything, sweetness, but darling Blakele has your number (even if your family apparently doesn't). You didn't know your own darling mammele was that sick, and yet, oy you're so close? Darling, if Bitsy so much as sneezes in Los Angeles, fourteen Kedems in Israel say "Gesundheit!" at the same time!
How is darling Imperial taking all of this?
And darling, are you going to get a bridge put in, or something? I assume that you are on the verge of leaving to see darling mamma, yes? Sweetness, no mother wants to see her daughter looking like a broken piano keyboard when she smiles!
Posting in hopes of point out some things, darling! Pointing out some things!
Mitzi
"And darling, are you going to get a bridge put in, or something?
I have no idea what you are talking about, none."
Of course not. Hillbillies don't know about Modern Dentistry. They prefer the wide open spaces.
Hey, it's a look. Not a good one, but a look nonetheless.
Darling Robbele, how smart you are! Bitsy said you look like you could spit watermelon seeds through the gap in your front teeth, Omele. I was merely suggesting that for a fancy-schmantzy film person, it's not good to be walking around like an extra on The Beverly Hillbillies, no matter how comfortable you are with the look, darling! It's the same thing with the hoodie and flared jeans, darling. It just makes you look more, well, masculine, darling. I know there've been a lot of french fries and Rooti-Tootie-Fresh 'n' Fruites over the gums since you were posing with the arched back and the girls out in front of G-d and everybody, but come on, sweetness, missing teeth? Is this the kind of look His Holiness the Patriarch of Wherever wants to see on his faithful? Mitzi doesn't think so, darling!
Maybe you could even get a gold front tooth, darling! What do the kids call it? A grille? You and Madonna, darling!
Trying to help, darling. Just trying to help!
Mitzi
It seems Hamou is following a trend! She always does try to be fashion forward.
http://farm5.staticflickr.com/4149/5186823826_5a867dec7d_z.jpg
Okay, we've had a string of posts from Hamou claiming two things:
(1) that she is in frequent and amicable contact with her mother and brother, and
(2) that she had a plane ticket to travel to MIchigan on January 7 to visit her mother and was prevented only by bad weather.
What she fails to explain is why her mother and brother, who knew the information was going to a prosecutor, forgot to tell the investigator about this planned trip.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"the false claim my family spoke prior to 2/20/2014 to the Los Angeles County District Attorney's office"
Try again, dumbo. No one said your family spoke to the D.A.'s office prior to February 20 . . . or at any time for that matter.
But I see you're ducking the real question.
WHY did neither your brother nor mother mention that you were expected in Michigan on January 7 but only failed to be there because of a flight cancellation?
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"the real reason I was emancipated as a child"
Oddly, neither your mother nor your brother knew anything about your ever having been emancipated.
Another one of your lies to paint your life as one of fascinating drama?
Or just more confusion about the law and what constitutes emancipation? (Hint: Getting on a bus is not sufficient.)
Darling, the idea that someone "has your number" means that they know what you are really up to, not that they have your cell phone number. Oh, darling. Your poor phone tossed out on the Freeway 405 all for nothing! (As if that really happened, but still, darling, the drama!)
Meanwhile, darling, darling Blakele has a point, as he so often does. Why didn't your darling mammele and brother just tell that nosy parker you had had to cancel your trip before going ahead and signing affidavits?
Sweetness, I think Blakele has your number. Now don't go tossing your brand new phone out the window at unsuspecting cars on the freeway, darling.
It just means he knows you're lying. So smart, that one!
Posting because I still care, darling. Still care!
Mitzele
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"I do have a new phone and as I said you will never ever possess it, ever!"
Having heard your voice in court, I would never want to hear it on a phone.
Creepy.
Hamou tweeted that she "spent time sword fencing".
I wonder if that's how she lost her front tooth.
Oh, my dears. I think it would be hard to lose a tooth fencing. I mean, one does wear a face guard when properly attired for a fencing match, doesn't one? And we know that Ms. Hamou / McConnell / Murphy / Moran / Hanoi would not think of showing up without proper equipment, don't we?
No, my pets. I think it much more likely that she lost the tooth when she bit down on a pearl in the oysters at Gladstone's. Of Malibu.
Dining at Gladstone's. Horseback riding at the Equestrian Center. Fencing. I'm sure we'll soon hear about her prowess at polo.
Or maybe all these things are just her code words for bowling? Sort of like Burbank being her code word for Lake Los Angeles.
oopsie. IT busted itself again. "when I do get the chance I go to the Valley or in Hollywood"
forgetting of course that Burbank IS IN THE VALLEY and people living in the "Valley" wouldn't say "I go to the Valley" since they are already THERE. They'd say "I go to Encino" or "to Van Nuys" but NOT "to the "Valley"
Now, what about the tooth, the whole missing tooth, and nothing but the tooth??
The one subject it steadfastly refuses to acknowledge is Hamou McConnell's MISSING FRONT TOOTH!
Wonder why?
Bob, the 30-day deadline has arrived for Hamou to remit the costs and fees to your attorney that the judge awarded you on January 29.
Has your lawyer received the payment yet, or do you now have another unpaid legal judgment against Hamou?
Also, did Hamou meet the 30-day deadline to appeal the award, as she claimed she was going to do?
Or was this just another of her endless empty threats?
Empty threats, empty teeth, empty promises.
Lots of gaping empty spaces around Hamou McConnell these days.
I see that Hamou has been posting this morning but ducking the matter about the 30-day deadline running out last week.
I guess that check to Bob's lawyer was in the same kind of imaginary envelope as the cashier's check that she said was on the way to pay her contempt sanctions in Travis Country.
Hamou's unpaid court judgments -- and the interest -- just continue to rack up.
True Blake. She seems less inclined to discuss that then she is to talk about that Hillbilly missing front tooth of hers...
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"pretending to know for certain, I was never ever emancipated as a child and I was never ever abused as a child"
It is my understanding your family did not say you were never abused as a child. They said your father was an alcoholic who physically abused you and your siblings. But they also said they know of no sexual molestation of you.
Your mother, who would be in a position to know, said you were never legally emancipated. And, no matter how young you say your brother was at the time, is it realistic to think that by now he would never have heard of any emancipation if there had been one?
This is pretty dicey stuff to be discussing in public on the internet. But it was you, after all, who introduced this topic to public discussion years ago.
Just as it was you who introduced claims about being raped, losing babies, being beaten, owning a film studio, running an international charity, etc.
Internet forums are never one-way streets. When you voluntarily put your life -- or your version of it -- on the internet, you become fair game for having it explored and discussed, no matter where that discussion goes.
We have not investigated a single thing about your life that you yourself have not first introduced into the discussion.
You said you were abused by your father. We investigated.
You said you were a movie actress. We investigated.
You said you ran an international charity. We investigated.
You said you and your children lived with Don Morton. We investigated.
You said you were beaten by Marcus Demian. We investigated.
You posted an array of pictures on the internet with your face on obviously different bodies. We investigated.
You wrote that you flew from Boston to Los Angeles on 9/11. We investigated.
You said you were in Michigan on January 7. We investigated.
And the beat goes on.
Darling Omele, I hope you are tweeting your imaginary boyfriend Vlad to stay out of the darling Ukraine? He will want to know what you think, darling!
Posting because I care about your geopolitical position, my darling. Because I care!
Mitzi
After the court rejected her first attempt to secure a permanent restraining order against Atchison (and went on to award him costs and fees for her ungrounded attempt), Hamou applied for another temporary restraining order against Atchison on February 11. This time court denied her petition for even the temporary order.
A full hearing (where rules of evidence would apply instead of just the petitioner's allegations) was scheduled on the matter for February 26 to give her a chance to make her case. Just as she did when the first petition went to full hearing, she failed to show, resulting in a final dismissal for lack of prosecution.
What happened this time? Was she beaten again on the evening of the 25th? Or was it a car wreck, or a baseball whack on the head, or armed gunmen at her door, or a cordon of stalkers, or a rape, or a hail of bullets as she ran to her car, or a hospitalization for a life-threatening infection, or a new cancer outbreak?
Or could she just not find her toothbrush?
It seems that yet another court has become familiar with her tactics.
Regarding the new petition for a TRO, SnoopOmaSand posted:
"Actually the court told me a better route to go and that is the one I am taking"
If that were the case, you would have simply withdrawn the petition when you were given this advice about a "better route".
Instead you pressed ahead with the petition, causing the court to schedule a full hearing and causing you to add another "no show" in court to your lengthening record.
Once again, you fail to think through how obvious the illogic of your lie is.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"I simply forgot to do this."
Yeah.
Like you always forget to throw out the unused checks when you close bank accounts.
Like you forgot to refile your RICO case.
Like you forgot to appeal the judgment Atchison got against you.
Like you forgot to file an objection to the sister state judgment Atchison obtained in Calfornia.
Like you forgot to appeal the recent award of costs and fees to Atchison.
Like you forgot to send Atchison's lawyer the money the court ordered you to send.
Like you forgot to send the certified check to the Travis County Court for the sanctions.
Like you forgot to appear in traffic court until after the court issued a bench warrant.
Like you forgot to provide the probation office with the certificate that you attended animal cruelty classes.
You seem to have a chronic memory problem. You should have it checked out.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"the only entity that I must show proof to is the Los Angeles Superior Court"
Well, you offered to show the judge proof on February 20, but instead of looking at your proof he scheduled a hearing on the probation violation for March 23.
Wonder why that was?
SnoopOmaSand posted in huge boldface type:
"I do not have a probation officer"
No one said you did, nitwit. If you'll look at my post more carefully, you'll see it said you failed to turn your certificate in to the probation office.
Every court has a probation office, called by one name or another, that oversees the compliance with court-imposed orders issued to those placed on probation. It doesn't always involve the assignment of a specific probation officer.
No one would have expected you to visit the judge to deliver your certificate to him personally. You were expected, however, to submit it to those who were responsible for overseeing your compliance with probation terms.
Of course, since you have a history of probation violations, it might be too much to expect you to understand how probation oversight works.
The phones keep ringing. Yet another victim has reached out.
This one is VERY interesting, with a rather familiar name...
Wow, Rob. Those calls really do come in almost like clockwork.
But what real property did she have to sell during that time period? The details of this scam will be very interesting . . . as is the identity of the "seller".
It is my understanding Blake that a police Detective has all those details.
Time will tell. Speaking of time, just a few more days now until the Probation Revocation Hearing.
SnoopOmaSand posted:
"there are NO INVESTIGATIONS pending with any law enforcement agency in the US"
But, Hamou, haven't you told Rob numerous times that he would not know if he were under investigation?
And I think you are forgetting that the District Attorney told the judge last month in the animal abuse case that more charges were anticipated against you upon conclusion of their investigation.
Try to keep your story straight, dear.
Girlfriend, I have never seen anyone so happy to be back in court. Based upon your track record, which is basically losing every single time, why does the prospect fill you with such glee? Oh, right, because this time it will be apparent you are telling the truth.
Riiiiiiiiiiiiiight.
RJ
March 13 Probation Revocation Hearing with the real possibility of incarceration for "Alexandra McConnell". Just a few more hours.
The Judge "Ms McConnell, I compelled you back in, uh, last July not to possess any animals. Do not possess any animals."
Post a Comment