As law enforcement seems unable to assist me, and the person behind this campaign to defame me and interfere with my business and profession, named variously Oma Hamou, Oma Mcconnell or Alexandra McConnell is what they call "judgment proof" meaning she has no money, I must place this blog here.
I would NOT even have written here, had this person not continually written her own false and defamatory statements herself and aided and abetted other personae writing "on her behalf" for the last three years. If she doesn't want me to say anything about her, she ought not have been continually blogging and writing about me much less aiding and encouraging others to do so as well.
The woman behind all of this goes by many names: Oma Hamou, Oma McConnell, Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Hamou, Oma Demian, Alexandra Murphy, are the usual ones, but there are others.
This woman, Oma Hamou, Oma McConnell, Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Hamou, Oma Demian, Alexandra Murphy and her other aliases have a twenty year track record of FELONY CONVICTIONS, multiple arrests, failure to abide by the requirements of her probation for her felony convictions which lead to more arrests, many many civil judgments against her for hundreds of thousands of dollars, a history of writing bad checks, and currently she was arrested late in 2008 in San Bernardino California on a Felony Charge of Forgery of a Financial Instrument (she seems to have forged a large check) After 14 months of dragging the process out, she paid the Victim full restitution and the District Attorney dropped the Felony charge.
Someone else has recently posted a precis of the criminal and debt history of this woman. You can go here to read the specific details for yourself:
http://www.omahamoureality.blogspot.com
She is nearly psychotic in her daily compulsion because I stumbled onto the actual facts of her past, and present, which do not coincide with the personae she wants to project to others.
This woman, Oma Hamou, Oma McConnell, Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Hamou, Oma Demian, Alexandra Murphy et al, has for YEARS now, threatened me with civil and criminal actions. For years now, NOTHING has happened except more ongoing threats online.
I am called a "criminal stalker". First, being called a criminal is Libel per se in Texas, since I have never been convicted of ANYTHING worse than one speeding ticket. As for a stalker, well, I have no clue where this woman is, where she lives, and frankly I don't WANT to know, nor can I care less. In the words of one of her attorney's, Dave. S. "the faster that woman is in my rearview mirror the happier I'll be" (yeah I have the email he said that to me in.). I WISH NO CONTACT WITH OR FROM THIS PERSON.
I do NOT wish this person ill, or harm. Frankly, I do not care about her. The less I hear about her, the better. That said, no one should ever be subjected to harm or danger. I DO NOT WISH THIS PERSON HARM, nor have I advocated, wished, nor advised anyone to harm her. Such allegations are baseless, wrong and defamatory. I just want he to leave me and my partner ALONE and stop the thousands of pages of defamatory lies she puts up and allows "friends" to post on her website in order to cause me harm.
This woman, Oma Hamou, Oma McConnell, Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Hamou, Oma Demian, Alexandra Murphy has demonstrated she has no credibility. You can read below in previous posts where she has outright lied, most notably when she filed a report about her business with Dunn and Bradstreet that was investigated by them and shown to be completely fraudulent.
Ask yourself if the following make any, rational or reasonable common sense:
This woman claims to be an actress and model, but for a decade steadfastly REFUSES to provide one single shred of evidence to support the allegation, not even a credit, reference or magazine issue. She says only "I was and I don't have to prove it. YOU have to prove I wasn't". Does that make sense?
This woman claims that her three felony convictions were not Her fault, but rather someone else's fault. Does THAT make sense?
This woman claims that her recent Felony Forgery Charges in San Bernardino are "just a big mistake" and "law enforcement and the DA" are on "her side" and "believe her", yet they STILL pressed charges and scheduling dozens of hearings over FOURTEEN MONTHS. Does THAT make sense??
This woman has claimed for six years non stop that I am being investigated by law enforcement and the FBI. Yet, NOTHING ever happened, I have never been contacted by law enforcement for any reason in those six years other than one speeding ticket. Does it make any sense to you that law enforcement is doing ANYTHING for six years now?
Buddha said Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense.
Look at all the blathering posts she has put up on the internet, and ask yourself, do these things agree with YOUR reason and your own common sense? The answer is obvious.
As you can see, this woman and/or her cronies now LIE, falsify documents and use years old private letters to attempt to defame and disparage me, and Bob Atchison
Many people whom have come into contact with her call her a con artist and scam artist. She hangs out with convicted felons, even inviting these career criminals to live in her house with her.
You can verify all the arrests, judgments etc for yourself with simple online searches.
You are free to email me with your questions, and if you yourself have been a VICTIM of this woman Oma Hamou, Oma McConnell, Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Hamou, Oma Demian, Alexandra Murphy, I encourage you to contact me.
386 comments:
1 – 200 of 386 Newer› Newest»Please start new comments here.
As usual, Ms. Hamou is trying to spin a web of confusion around her affairs.
The court minutes note that the case was dismissed because "THE VICTIM HAS RECEIVED FULL RESTITUTION."
Note the word "victim".
But here's the more interesting note. The minutes say the case was "DISMISSED PURSUANT TO 1385 PC."
And here's the relevant part of California Penal Code Section 1385:
"(a) ... No dismissal shall be made for any cause which would be ground of demurrer to the accusatory pleading."
What this sentence means is that a case is not eligible for dismissal under this clause if the case against the accused had no merit. In other words, the judge found that the DA had a strong case but dismissed it because the defendant agreed to make restitution to the victim. It was the need to determine the DA's case was solid that required a preliminary hearing before the dismissal could be accepted under this clause.
Given the fact that California jails are spilling over and the D.A. wanted to be sure Mrs. Batchelor got her money, he simply agreed to settle this case to accommodate those needs. It had nothing to do with the merits of his case.
Vindicated? Hardly.
Brian Watson has decided that the California penal code doesn't exist, and Hedley isn't a lawyer?
Oh boy! Business as usual on her forum! To quote "Snoopy", who fo course is Oma,
"Yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay!!!!"
You big girl, you.
RJ
Hola! Very busy. Sticky renewals.
But! Carry on!
You'd think Hamou would learn, but I guess not.
Every time she tries to attack Moshein and Atchison on the internet with threats to make them pay for their "crimes", she's the one who ends up having to cough up money or sitting in jail.
Some "Legends" forum was used as a bully pulpit to attack them and, despite Hamou's claim that the police in Irvine were on her side, she had to make good on bad checks she "accidentally" wrote on closed accounts in order to avoid prosecution. What Hamou is not telling anybody is that the Irvine police already had her under investigation before anyone from Legends contacted them as a result of things that were revealed about Hamou on the Legends forum.
She later starts up an "Austin Wine Guy" blog to attack Moshein, which institages the creation of this blog. She rants and rages that Moshein and Atchison are criminals and perjurers, that they are under police investigation, that the police are going to be contacting them any minute, that they will pay for their misdeeds (all of which are libelous claims, by the way).
What happens? Hamou passes another bad check to a Mrs. Batchelor who, like the victims in Irvine, goes to the police. Hamou is arrested for felony forgery, sits in jail for weeks under a $1 million bond and, after 14 months of numerous court appearances and attorney fees, once again has to write a check to the person she stiffed in order to avoid conviction.
And what has happened to Moshein and Atchison while Hamou's been forced to cough up all this money? Well, no calls or visits from the police, no criminal investigations underway, not one cent spent.
Boy, Hamou certainly knows how to exact her revenge. Much more of her masterful internet revenge against Moshein and Atchison and she'll be flat broke.
Oh, wait. What am I saying?
Ms. Hamou/McConnell, my dear.
That check you wrote to Mrs. Batchelor is at least the second time you got into a scrape with the police over writing checks on a closed account.
Don't you think it would be prudent, sweetheart, to destroy the checkbooks once you close the accounts so such unfortunate incidents don't recur?
Perhaps poor Mrs. Batchelor had such an overwrought reaction to being given a check on a closed account when she found out you had done the same thing before.
I honestly cannot imagine any reason to carry around checkbooks on a closed account. Unless .....
Oh, dear. Now I get it.
Tsk, tsk, my pet.
Aw, get a grip, Hamou. Penelope was just trying to be helpful in suggesting that a person who had at least twice gotten into legal scrapes by making the mistake of writing checks on a closed account just might want to destroy the checks once the account was closed.
But for those of us who were not on the turnip truck with Penelope, let's get real here.
One of the standard cons is to open a checking account and then close it but keep the checks for future use. All the better to open a new account using the same type of checks so that you can use the excuse that you got "confused" if you get caught at it.
The real reason you're ranting month in and month out about this being on the internet is that you plan to do it again, and now you're worried that the next victim, too, will find out about your M.O. by searching the internet. And you know the chances of convincing anyone the third time around that it was an innocent mistake is nil.
So one of your means of support is now at higher risk. Must be driving you ccccccrazy.
You brought this on yourself by continuing your internet attacks on Moshein and Atchison. Keep it up. It's really working for you.
I dunno Blake, what you just said was laden with malice.
Dear BFF,
At least Blake doesn't punctuate everything he says by annopuncing that Oma Hamou is "full of shit". Give him some credit. "Laden with malice"? Nothing that has been published on this forum (or her own, for that matter) is of the slightest interest to law enforcement, which has its' hands full with real issues. Blake's explanation for Oma Hamou's chagrin makes perfect sense if you put it into the pattern of her personal history, which contains more encounters with the law than statistics have laid down for our guidance. Just a blond, I suppose.
She blithely disregards the meaning of the decision as it was handed down according to the California penal code, i.e. specifically that the District Attorney had the goods when he brought the suit, and that it was being dismissed only because she made restitution for her crime. I challenge her to produce one iota of evidence that Mrs. Batchelor was surfing the net and decided that Oma was a con artist based upon what she found. Let's face it: Mrs. Batchelor had personal dealings with Oma Hamou, dealings that involved financial matters. Those are usually quite sufficient to establish Hamou's credentials as a con artist.
The internet is just the frosting on the cake.
Rebecca
Oh, that's right, so when Mr. Moshein was accusing me of being out to get him physically or whatever it was he was doing, they didn't care. I have your word that the police could care less, correct? I mean, it was on both forums, right?
Why does "snoopy" insist I am making up a COURT RECORD???
Here is the text of the existing record:
Case FVI802540 Defendant 3045972 MCCONNELL, ALEXANDRA OMA
Defendant 1 of 1
Action:
Case FVI802540 Defendant 3045972 MCCONNELL, ALEXANDRA OMA
Action: PRELIMINARY HEARING Date: 01/13/2010 Time: 9:00 AM
Division: V4 Hearing Status: DISPOSED
JAMES M DORR
CLERK: MJC-MARY CONRAD
CERTIFIED COURT REPORTER: FM-FRANCES MACIAS CSR# FM-10918
DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY BRYAN STODGHILL PRESENT.
ATTORNEY BRIAN WATSON-RETAINED PRESENT.
DEFENDANT PRESENT.
-
PROCEEDINGS
ACTION CAME ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
A CIVIL COMPROMISE HAS BEEN MET - THE VICTIM HAS RECEIVED FULL RESTITUTION
DISMISSALS
ON MOTION OF DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, CASE IS DISMISSED PURSUANT TO 1385 PC .
-
CUSTODY STATUS
CURRENT BAIL BOND EXONERATED.
DEFENDANT RELEASED.
============= MINUTE ORDER END ================
CASE CLOSED.
go see for yourself by pasting this link into your browser
http://170.164.31.10/openaccess/CRIMINAL/minute.asp?courtcode=X&casenumber=FVI802540&defnbr=3045972&defseq=1&otnmseq=0&dsn=&actioncode=TPRLM&actiondate=20100113&actiontime=9
or go search the case number and click on minutes, for the Preliminary Hearing.
full text of PC 1385
1385. (a) The judge or magistrate may, either of his or her own motion or upon the application of the prosecuting attorney, and in furtherance of justice, order an action to be dismissed. The reasons for the dismissal must be set forth in an order entered upon the minutes. No dismissal shall be made for any cause which would be ground of demurrer to the accusatory pleading.
BFF,
I don't know. Rob, did you contact the police about Mrs. Biernat's violent proclivities? If he didn't, then no, they didn't care because they didn't know about it. If he did, then no, I would assume they didn't care if you were not contacted as an imminent threat. Were you contacted as an imminent threat, BFF? Does Rob view you as a threat? That's a different kettle of fish. I am willing to concede that Oma views Rob as a threat. So what? I view Sarah Palin as an imminent threat, but unless the police do, she's safe. The point is that your other BFF keeps claiming --- for years --- that she has dragged in the police, the F.B.I., mysterious and yet cowardly law firms, and God knows who else, the State Department? --- to apprise them of the vicious threat to her safety that she claims Moshein and Atchison represent. According to Rob, they have not been contacted one single time. Forgive my scepticism about how they are taking Hamou seriously.
People have spoken to the Batchelor family. People were present in the courtroom each time this case was heard during the past month. The eyewitnesses and the Batchelors contradict her version of the events that transpired. What do you get as an answer? Girlish shrieks of wrath from "Snoopy", and once again from the law enforcement and legal authorities . . . dead silence. They had enough evidence to proceed to trial. They dropped it because at the last possible minute she pulled the check out and paid up. Grifter.
Anyway, Michelle, I don't run the board and I am not Rob Moshein or Bob Atchison. I am Rebecca Jordan, and I don't have the authority to speak for Rob. Are you asking me if I think you're a threat? You posted using intemperate language, and I just assume you were shooting off your mouth. But the language was intemperate and if it had been aimed at me, I might feel differently.
Hope that answers your question.
I'm on a business trip for the next few days, will post as I can. Thank God, it will be warm.
Rebecca
C'mon, Russophile.
Haven't you figured out by now that we go after you for chuckles as, I'm sure, you do with us, at least in part?
I seriously doubt if Rob or anyone else is going to call the cops on you. Unlike Hamou, he's not stark raving mad and trying to keep a check-kiting game rolling.
You should consider coming over to the Dark Side. It's a lot more fun over here. Lot less time spent dressing for court, too.
Well, less time for everyone except Penelope.
I know. Every time I call her she's pressing damn lace.
Is this where you say you're my mother's cousins' uncle's father twice removed in a heavy, prank caller voice?
Now see, if this was Oma's forum, that would be a euphemism, Blake.
Your wit is impenetrable, BFF.
Your uncle knew who his father was? Damn. Another missed opportunity.
BFF, I'll spell it out for you: Star Wars, Thumb Wars.
And no, sorry Blake, no uncles. Mom was an only, dad had a sister.
So not to change the subject or anything, but I have been listening to the Susan Boyle CD (Leighton my niece gave it to me for Christmas). Has anyone else? I mean, have you heard the woman's version of "Wild Horses"? There is hope for us old girls!
RJ
Thumb Wars? I think this is going to be like the cartoon reference a few months agoo, BFF. I just don't know what thoise are. You mean like when we were kids and we would fight with our thumbs?
Well, family relationships always throw me.
I still haven't figured out which branch of the family Dadi Pedovich came from and whether there was consanguinity between him and Seno Evilevna.
Seamus, where are you when we need you?
It's a movie. Steve Oedekerk did spoofs on it. The kids thought they were a howl.
As your other BFF constantly points out, I have no man, hence no kids . . . I am cut off from the current scene. Poor me.
Boy, Becky. You really aren't a modern girl, are you?
Blake,
I used to be groovy, as we said back in the day. I went to grad school in swingin'London in the early 1970s. But in the end Miss Porter grads always revert to type. there are good girls, and bad girls, and it is in the cards at birth. I wanted to be a bad girl, but in the end, I'm just what they used to call a preppy.
RJ
"my mother's cousins' uncle's father twice removed "
is actually nonsense. One can't have a father "twice removed". Nor an "uncle twice removed". Now a cousin twice removed, their uncle is a cousin three times removed and his father is a second cousin three times removed.
Do I consider Biernat to be a "threat"? Well, I believe 100% that she has MADE threats towards me. Has she taken any action to act upon those threats? not to my knowledge. Did I call the police and report threats? I did not. No point. I discussed the matter with a local very prominent criminal defense attorney who is a personal friend, who advised that there was nothing the police can do when someone 1700 miles away posts something on the internet without taking any action to follow thru.
Now, if I found out Biernat was in Austin, that would be different.
Hope this clears things up.
Oh, God. I just went over and took a look. "Snoopy" iws back from lunch with "Oma" ( a moment while we all stop laughing ), and he is going to the cops who will force Rob to reveal everyone's identities.
Girlfriend, get a grip. I am Rebecca Jordan. The police aren't going to pay any attention to you, Oma, unless you stiff another person. In which case they will pay lots of attention to you again.
If you could stop gabbling your pseudo-legalese and ask some real questions of a qualified attorney, he or she can explain to you the simplest concepts like "stalking", "harrassment" and above all, "Jurisdiction."
RJ
There you go, BFF. So I think the solution is not to go to Austin, and Rob will stay away from Portland. Sleep tight, America.
But Mr. Russo WANTS to go to Austin. For the music fest thingee. I'm all about a cruise with the kiddies to Alaska.
Hmm, I think you have a problem, then. But still, maybe you can slip in and out of the city without setting off the alarms. On the other hand, Alaska! Will you do this after your boys complete their military service?
Oma, sweetheart, settle down. This should be good times for you. You're not going to jail, and while I'm sure it hurt to part with the dinero, look at the bright side. You're not going to jail! This week, anyway.
And another blog? Yeah, because that's what this needs.
Ass.
RJ
Oh, and no one ever said that the Batchelor family was present in the courtroom, Oma, or that this was where and when they spoke about you.
And slacks! Nice choice!
We're trying to work it with all the boys, the youngest will be back from Iraq. The adopted one is having issues with the VA. Honestly! The kid puts his life on the line and they don't pay his tuition! They say he never served and I have pics of him and my natural son in Afghanistan! And Congress thinks Government health care will work????
Posted today by "Sandman":
"Hamou issued a check on a closed account this is communicated by the bank to the ex landlord. The landlord communicates with Hamou her rental check came back both agree Hamou would provide a replacement check after Thanksgiving weekend of 2008. The landlord does an internet search on Hamou's name & discovers Pallasart's libelous site and learns of its story about Oma Hamou in turn this causes the landlord a great deal of concern/grief as she believes the words published on the web is the truth."
Uh, why would Batchelor do a search on the name of "Hamou" if the check was given to her by "Alexandra McConnell"?
Now, if Hamou -- the woman who gave the check on a closed account -- told her she was using an alias, any rational person would be alarmed and creeped out. No mystery why Batchelor would have contacted the police.
Let's see here. The police in Irvine tell Hamou to press charges against Moshein, et al., for their "crimes". What happens?
Nothing.
The police tell Batchelor to press charges against McConnell for a "mistake". What happens?
Arrest. Bail. 14 months of court appearances. Victim restitution.
Ever hear of symmetry in an argument, Hamou?
Oma, I gotta hand it to you. Wearing those black stockings with holes in them and bringing that fat woman in sneakers was really smart. Set up the pity play just right. You both looked like something the cats dragged in to court. Brilliant.
Did they give you a discount?
"Fat woman"? Oh my. Seems that Team Moshein is prejudiced about those who weigh more than their svelte selves. Pity.
Darlings! So exciting, she avoided doing time! It's a miracle!
Here at Team Moshein, Brandy, we don't say "fat", we say zaftig, although between you and me the pictures I saw of them? Zaftig is kind of a nice way to put it, and what's with the sneakers on a formal occasion like a court appearance? Also, Omele, a little clear polish will help with the ladders.
Beckele, darling, you're going to be in my neck of the woods? I don't suppose I can persuade you to head up to me after your meetings? Of course as the saying goes you can't get here from there, but if you reroute through DaVinci, darling, Team Kedem would be happy to put you up for a few days. Let me know, bubbele.
Teams, darlings! I love it!
Mitzi
OK, so now Oma took PICTURES of herself and "handmaiden" before they went to Court....
"I was told my friend wasn't wearing black stocking as for Debbie aka Handmaiden she wasn't in sneakers in fact neither of these women looked like something the cats dragged into court, got the photos to prove it.
Snoopy"
Omele, darling, seriously? I'm Robbele? Darling, why? Rob isn't like you, darling, he posts on his forum all the time under his own name. You're the one who makes the big deal about how you aren't pretending to be poor Justin or that strange Mr. Newson with the weird pictures.
Why would Rob post under my name?
Oy, what a potzer you are, darling.
Mitzi KEDEM.
As I have always said, I post here ONLY under my own name. Bob NEVER posts here at all, though I think he did once or twice a long time ago but under his own name.
I know it might be difficult for people who all don't speak educated English to suspect that people who DO have educations and a command of the English language might all sound "similar"...at least to the semi-literate.
to the semi literate moron who wrote:
"in fact neither of these women looked like something the cats dragged into court, got the photos to prove it. "
In English, this sentence means: "In fact neither of these women looking like something the cats dragged into court, I HAVE GOT the pictures to prove it."
It's okay, boychik, she thinks Beckele is Bob. The weird thing is that she has met my sister Nitzana, and she is still denying we exist. Who can figure?
And here I thought I was being helpful with the nail polish suggestion.
I said it because I care, darling!
Mitzi
Mitzi,
As always, you crack me up. I would stop off but this is a flying visit just to handle some things face to face. Give me a rain check, honey, or better yet, let me know if you are still coming to New York in March?
Rebecca
By the way,
Please join me and Bob, we sent money to relief organizations in Haiti. Anything no matter how small will be hugely important to those in such immediate need of assistance. Huffington Post has a good list of "vetted" and trustworthy aid organizations. We chose Doctors Without Borders/Medecins Sans Frontiers as they are already on the ground there.
Lord how pathetic. "snoopy" posts some document from somewhere unidentified maybe law enforcement, where it says CLEARLY that Oma Hamou has made complaints against Bob but the FBI HAS NO INTEREST IN INVESTIGATING them.
my word has team hamou lost any grip on reality??
Oh, and the first web page bob did create was the very first page on the APTM, OmaHamouReport was me from day one. Bob never had anything to do with it, so stop trying to confuse the issue.
But then, team hamou screams about stuff that happened six years ago, but Om never did anything about it. Yet they think "law enforcement" will drop everything NOW years later and give her pathetic whining top priority? yeah. right.
idiots. total idiots. Bob NEVER had any such conversations with "mike newson" and I am the ONLY person who ever had anything to do with OmaHamouReport. Look at what the moron posted. I had written the bio of a Grand Duke and Bob gave me the password to the APTM to post it. I used that to post a link visible ONLY to google so they would find MY website. and this was HOW LONG AGO? so anyone cares WHY?
I have no contact from Law enforcement despite the seven years of Oma Hamou or her "mouthpieces" screaming that I'm under investigation or "complaints" are "filed". I sleep well at night. Funny that Oma or her "mouthpieces" read my blog well into the wee hours of the morning according to the access logs.
"me thinks they doth protest too much."
I'm about done with the lunacy. No point wasting my time with a middle age nothing who has to wear black hose with wear holes in them, accompanied by her "assistant" a hugely obese middle aged woman with stringy flat straggly hair and tennis shoes.
You all keep on. I have more important things to do with my life this year than deal with lowlife scum in the low rent sections of the desert and her criminal cohorts.
The movie consulting gig. Bordeaux, way too much positive to get caught up in the total negative energy and felony charges that is Oma Hamou's reality.
Illuminati, you incompetent fool.
Shades of the wrong runway caper, you screwed up again, chasing that white Bronco. That was the Mayor of Victorville out for his morning Egg McMuffin run. She was in a black Ford SUV, you feckless moron. Driven by the large assistant human ... er, female. With the heavy-duty axle. (The truck, I mean.)
Your Lord, Master and Disciplinarian,
The Grand Shovel
O Mighty Grand Shovel,
My bad.
Now I'm really worried that there are pictures and video of me in my boxers out there on the internet. What idiot would want photographs of himself/herself half naked out there on the internet?
Oh.
Never mind.
And I'm getting text messages from Joe Earle. Some days it doesn't pay to get out of the down period cycle chamber.
Your faithful Minion,
Illuminati
Never let it be said thqat when Mitzi Kedem makes a mistake she doesnt admit it. Bitsy emailed me this morning to say that I had misunderstood her. The woman with Omele wasn't, repeat, was not wearing sneakers, but white casual flats kind of like espadrilles, or as we used to say in Brooklyn, cheap shoes. Bitsy also said that she was in a turquoisey skirt and top that looked a lttle tight on such a zafig figure, ankle length --- Omele is still pulling off knee-length, you go, girl! --- and a bit dated, as in it probably looked good during the first Clinton term, but still, color! Bitsy was kind of surprised that she was wearing color, because she thought that the woman looked kind of like a cult member in one of those groups that gets all excited if women cut their hair because it offends G-d or something. Darlings, I know! As though G-d has time to worry! But Bitsy said it was split-end city and just hanging down her back. But I told Bitsy it makes sense. Shes a Buddhist, she says, and those people dont pay attention to makeup and hair because they are in another place and it takes time away from important things like chanting. And Bitsy said Mitzi, I get it, but Golda Meir looked like Elle McPherson compared to this one, and G-d likes to look at nice things too, so make an effort. Get a haircut.
But now were worried about all of the cats. Maybe they eat them.
Mitzi
Sighhhh ... It's always something with you, isn't it, ignoble minion?
I will block the messages from Earle and divert them to a random address in, say, Palmdale.
Happy?
Speaking of the DPC chamber, did you find the new set of manacl ... er, mittens I left out for you last night? It can get, er, cold when you've been bad, can't it?
Your Lord and etc., etc.
The Grand Shovel
All Hamou's claptrap about the DA dropping the charges because he believed it was an "accident" that she wrote yet another check on a closed account is complete bullshit.
She's forgetting that we actually talked to Mrs. Batchelor's son, who tells a very different story of what was going on behind the scenes of her felony forgery case.
According to him, the DA was perfectly comfortable prosecuting the case, but Mrs. Batchelor's son wanted to spare his mother the trauma of having to be a witness in a felony trial and the likely numerous court appearances. His main agenda was to see that his mother got the money she was owed while entangling her as little as possible in further legal proceedings.
To that end, the DA agreed to try to get restitution and avoid putting Mrs. Batchelor through a trial.
If all that was going on was that Mrs. Batchelor wanted her money, Hamou had it and was willing to pay it, and the DA thought this was all a misfortunate misunderstanding, he would simply have told Mrs. Batchelor to accept the money from Hamou early on. He would not have tied up his staff with months and months of court appearances, and he would not have gone all the way to preliminary hearing in order to be sure the record showed the case was dismissed under PC 1385, which meant the prosecution case had merit to proceed.
DA's do not waste their strapped resources on months of proceedings with cases that the DA thinks were mere misunderstandings that were devoid of criminal intent.
Of course, Hamou will come back with howls of protest and with assurances that the DA saw everything her way. To believe it, all you will need to do is suspend your common sense -- and to believe a woman with Hamou's criminal and civil history over a young man who was trying to protect his mother from further entanglement with her.
Congratulations, Illuminati. You finally did something right.
Your idea of hanging onto the Ford bumper as it left the courthouse worked. While she was riding backwards and videotaping the traffic behind her, she didn't think to open the back hatch and look down.
I'm sorry for all the scrapes and bruises, so you don't have to wear the manac ... er, the mittens tonight. But I can't replace the torn bonbon undershorts until we get back to Thet ... er, Poughkeepsie. They don't sell anything like them here, even in West Hollywood.
Your Lord and etc., etc.,
The Grand Shovel
Well, its the end of another week and so far NO CONTACTS from "law enforcement" of any kind. This will mark the 416th consecutive week without any law enforcement contact since Oma Hamou/Alexandra McConnell started threatening it.
Maybe I should count down every week like this.
Well, dear, I know from coordinating church socials just how hard it can be to get a big operation together.
To get the LAPD, Irvine PD, Austin PD, a sheriff in Utah, the Batchelor family, and the FBI all onto the same page for a unified master assault on Fort Rob-Bob will take some doing.
If you would let me know when they arrive, my dear, I'd like to drop by with some watercress sandwiches. This case, with its tons of documents, hours of computer forensics, and dozens of cleverly-constructed interviews will no doubt leave them exhausted, and my sandwiches are simply wickedly refreshing.
Why, I've seen the meanest, burliest law enforcement officer you can imagine turn into a complete pussycat with enough goat cheese in him.
I'll just bring coffee for you two boys. I know how you feel about watercress.
"Fort Rob-Bob"??
Hey, kinda catchy. They can make clothes like Sean John. The Rob-Bob line of men's upper end clothing.
Already on the Haitian thing here. NW Medical teams has my money and support. They team up with Medical Teams International.
God watch over those poor people.
Good for you, Russophile Lady. It's wonderful to watch the world swing into action like this, and it makes me proud that I was born in America to see how quickly she has responded! We chose Doctors Without Borders as well, Robbele. The images from Haiti are simply sickening. So much suffering.
Mitzi
O mty shvl
snd key 2 mncles typng ths wth my nose.
sht
illmnti
Blake
Thanks for sending me that weird and clearly creepy pseudo post made by "Mike"...
How really weird, like suddenly whoever was typing forgot how to pretend to BE "Mike"... Making rookie/stupid mistakes, like mis-spelling Bob's name SIX TIMES EXACTLY THE SAME WAY, yet managing to get it right only twice.
"Allegedly" confirming what I said was true that Oma told us she was beneficiary to a large trust, but could ONLY access the money for her movie?? Conveniently though, she can't use the money to pay her BILLS.
and claiming that she had a personal fortune of ONE MILLION DOLLARS, at a time when she was renting a CHEAP room in Don Morton's house as a place to live??? She had a million bucks but had to live in one rented room in the Valley in a 75 year old man's house?? RIIIGGHHT...
Was good for a huge laugh tho. Thanks.
OH, and I forgot to mention the repeated mention of the "two gay guys in Austin" over and over, which is always "snoopy" but has never been "Mike" ANOTHER clear clue to the fraud of that post.
Thats right sis enjoys the comapany of reaaly really old guys with money Moshein so your just jelous. Thats why she was living with that don Morton guy for the pleasure of his mind. hell its always been her problem she keeps being attracted to these old guys with money because of there minds. at least she didnt marry Morton what more do you want???Lil Bits has always been trying to improve herself and she has found a lot of folks who want to help if they can be as a daddy to her.
OOOPSIE, seems "team hamou" decided that having that "trust fund stuff" out there wasn't a good idea so they deleted it, good thing I have the copy blake sent from yesterday!
heheheheheheheheh "too bad your legal education is so bad but there is president" ROFLMAO!!!!!
Guess that means that Obama is the "Precedent of the United States"..hehehehehehehheheheheh
Dear whoever you are. I don't have a "trust". I am not a beneficiary of any trust currently and get no money of any kind from ANY trust. Just FYI.
She has TRUST FUND? For why you never tell me this in life, Madame Hamou? All this time you say you not have money for Pushkin and you have TRUST FUND? You could have bought me Mercedes!
So this woman who was with you, Madame Hamou when you finally pay Madame Batchelor the many, many rubles you owe her. Was this your mother? From front not so much look like her, but from rear could be twins.
Her Imperial Highness is out haunting the Nevsky Prospekt today, or as she calls it: working street.
Well ghost of Boris, it's a little unclear, like much about Oma Hamou...she told US she had that trustfund. then for YEARS denied that, then yesterday psuedo Mike slipped up by admitting she WAS beneficiary to a trust, which would "fund her film", but she "missed her milestones" and so was denied access to the funds...Which is why it was weird she could get "trust fund money" for producing a film, but NOT for paying all those bills.
As for renting "a suite of rooms" on Mayall St that is laughable since the LA County property tax records show it was a modest 3 bedroom 2 bath house...only 2600 sq ft.
So exciting, she is now posting a lot as the "Mike" character. This is the great mind of the group of figments who spends all of his time copying things from Wikipedia. Fritzi's oldest boy is like that, always with the "let me tell you what that means, Aunt Mitzi!" and I want to say, "darling, seriously, the adults are talking", but Fritzi says I will stifle his creativity or something. I wonder if the real Mike is aware that the Queen of Platform Shoes is using his name so much, and putting up links to the websites that I am sure he must be embarrassed about now, or maybe not, who knows? Is there a Mrs. Mike? because if there is, and she know that her husband was putting up pictures of young lovelies for pervs to drool over, she must be a saint. Or an idiot, who knows? Anyway, "Mike" used to be the most restful of the figments --- not like that little pisher "Snoopy", always talking such gutter talk, and now "Mike" has hopped on the bandwagon to make fun of the gays. Omele, seriously, darling, I am asking because I care, is this the way you want to go? Because darling, you keep talking about Hollywood like you know what you are doing, and so far you are insulting the Gays and my people, and darling, there are a lot of them in the industry that you are so frantically trying to crack into. In fact, there are gay Jews, even, so you are offending twice as hard as you might if you were to take a swing at, say, football players. Although all of the tuchis swatting that used to go on after one of those boys made a touchdown, you had to wonder. Am I right?
Of course I am. So Omele, lay off my people and the Gays. Why don't you pick on the Pope for awhile. That woman who came out of the crowd and tackled him on Christmas Eve? I thought of you, darling. I really did. Blake told me about how you once dressed up as a waitress and crashed a party for Queen Elizabeth II just to get close to the woman.
Sweetheart, bubbele, I know you don't like us to talk about the clothes, but we need to talk about the platform shoes. Darling, its 2010. One word? Re-think.
Mitzi Kedem
Oma, darling,
There are no issues. You lie. You lie reflexively, darling, about everything, because you are determined that not one single thing that has happened to you is your own fault, and darling . . . well . . . what can one say? You have bilked everyone you could conceivably bilk (there are records of this and they have been posted) and you accept no responsibility at all for anything you have done. Run up debts that you can't pay? All businesses do that. Taken advantage of an old man? You liked his mind. You don't own platform shoes? Sweetheart, you wore them to court the other day. Not homophobic? "Maybe they cannot think the way that straight men do?" Darling, I admit that you probably have had more experience with straight men than most girls your age, darling, but honestly? Statements like that aren't helping the whole "Oma is broad-minded" cause.
You have not posted one single thing that I have seen that proves any of your positions are valid. On the other hand, you have had your head handed to you in court how many time? Judgments, criminal convictions, restitution payments, come on, bubbele, who's kidding whom here?
I finally realize that you actually believe the things you right. Darling, it doesn't make you right. It makes you mentally ill.
I post because I care, Omele.
Mitzi
Mitzi,
All I can say is: BRAVA!
Spot on. ***applause***
Yes, sure,of "course" Oma was "harmed" by what Mrs. Batchelor "read". NOT. Mrs. Batchelor was harmed when Oma Hamou using the alias name Alexandra McConnell wrote a rent check to her on a CLOSED account. IF she hadn't given her landlord a BUM check, in her own words, nothing would have happened. So just where does the blame START??
I will only answer this one last time, forever.
I never disobeyed any court order of any kind during the litigation against me which Oma Hamou non-suited voluntarily and which she never again pressed, and for which any statutes of limitations have long passed.
If Hamou honestly believed I had disobeyed any court order, she was well represented by counsel and had the opportunity to have this addressed by the Court. She did nothing.
Had Hamou honestly believed I failed to provide documents requested during Discovery, she was well represented by counsel and could have had this addressed by the Court. She did nothing. Nor did she even bring the issue up before the judge prior to non-suit. She was asked specifically if there were any unaddressed pre-trial issues. She said nothing.
These nonsense fictional allegations are wholly moot and without merit.
There, you have my answer. Go away you gutless delusion of Oma Hamou's deluded psyche.
Oma, darling, as several of us have pointed out, the Batchelors do not confirm your version of the events that led to your jail time. And no, Handmaiden, darling you are not off the list of fictitious characters. All we know is that an obese woman with bad hair in a turquoise dress accompanied Oma the other day. You could be her mother, you could be Gomer's wife, we don't know, darling.
You have lost every court case in which you have ever been involved. The alte Kacker husband got custody of the kids way back when, you have judgments leveled against you by company after company, you just got called on an attempt to bilk Mrs. Batchelor, and I am sure there are other things as well, darling. Those are facts, Omele, not interpretations.
Really, darling, get some help? Do it for Mitzi. I ask because I care.
Mitzi Kedem
I wish she would stop using those ridiculous emoticons when she posts as me, it makes me look like an asshole, the same when she makes me sound like a little girl with the yaaaaaaaaaaaay shit. All I need is for someone where I work to google my name and come up with that shit!
Darling Omele writing as "Mike",
Eat a little something sweet, take a deep breath, and let it pass through you. Look, darling, you have posted nothing that contradicts the Batchelors' version of what happened other than your repeated attempts to cast it all on Robbele, and darling, that wasn't what happened, and you know it. I mean, I think you do know deep down, but since you have never, ever been able to admit that you yourself are to blame for anything you have ever done, there probably isn't much chance that you are going to start with this event.
Do you know what the Yiddish word chutzpah means, Omele? Given your past actions, I can't believe that it has never come up in regard to your behavior, but if it hasn't let me be the first to use it. You have it in spades, darling.
And while you were okay looking back in the day (the jawline, sweetheart, what can I say?) I don't think it was a level of beauty that could drive men wild. I'm not saying Bob is better looking, although the only pictures I've ever seen of him are the shots you post, and I don't think you go out of your way to find the most flattering, if you know what I mean and I think you do. But I also don't see a gay man dropping everything at the sight of you and then acting out of "unrequited" love. Besides, darling, don't you usually "requite", to put it nicely?
I'm worried about you, Omele, hunched over the computer pretending to be all of these people. And thinking that the whole world is thinking of you, darling.
Wouldn't it be more sensible to get a job and start trying to make something of yourself? You can do it, Oma!
I cheer for you because I care, darling.
Mitzi Kedem
Darling Omele writing as "Handmaiden",
This is exactly the kind of thing that I mean, darling. In point of fact Mrs. batchelor did not have to wait a year for restitution because of Rob or Bob or anyone but you, Oma Hamou. You wrote the bad check, and then you were unable to pay up, and then you dragged your heels about writing a check so that it took the courts hauling you in several times and threatening you with criminal trial before you actually paid the poor woman. There is no court documentation at all that says Mrs. Batchelor read anything at all about you, darling. The Batchelors deny this. Honestly, with three decades of grifter behavior under your belt, is this the best you can do???
Try again.
Mitzi
Darling, I'm not the one with my tuchis hanging out on the internet. Jealous? I never claimed to be a great beauty, and I did say that you were okay looking back in the day, Omele writing as "Handmaiden". I mean, what do you want me to do, lie?
Alright, if it means that much to you. You are the best looking girl from West Virginia I have ever seen.
Happy?
Mitzi
Mitz,
Thanks for sending me 'handmaiden de Sayton's" overnight nervous breakdown.
I love the part where it's supposed to be "my" fault Mrs. Batchelor didn't get paid.
Ummm, lets see, she accidentally writes a bad check, but then HAS to wait to pay Mrs. B.....why? What stopped her from getting the money, making up a nice gift basket and going over to Mrs. Batchelor's house oh say, just before Christmas with a big note of apology, a fruit basket, a hug, and the CASH??? well, nothing of course. You see, THAT is what normal people who well and truly had made a mistake would have done. OWN UP TO IT ASAP AND MAKE IT RIGHT ASAP. Not wait FOURTEEN MONTHS until forced to go to a criminal trial after wasting the DA's time to attend some TEN different court appearances....
Robbele, how thoughtful to think of the fruit basket! Your parents raised you so well, darling. I would have brought a honey cake, but the idea is the same.
Mitzele
Thank you Mitz.
Darling, deeper and deeper into the poo with the gay stuff you go. You're not seriously posting that "some of my best friends are gay", are you? Because darling, I dealt with that back in the States as a Jew and even here in Israel I occasionally hear people say things like "some of my best friends are Palestinians". You know what that means, darling? It means you are always conscious of the difference between you, and that is why you feel free to hang all sorts of nasty, vicious little digs at Rob and Bob on the fact that they don't share your sexuality, and let's face it, darling, the word is that you share that with a lot of people.
Honestly, darling go back to the ranting about how the whole world has ganged up on Oma Hamou from the beginning, but leave the phobias about the Jews and gays out of it. And for G-d's sake, have a little shame when you use metaphors, Omele. Your suffering cannot be compared to the Shoah. People died in the Shoah, they didn't merely wind up having to make restitution to victims of their con artistry.
Mitzi is disappointed in you, Oma.
I say it because I care, darling, and I want you to do better than this.
Mitzi Kedem
My word Blake, they really ARE starting to sound desperate and wigged out!
Of "course" they have a video tape where Mrs. Batchelor REFUSED to take the money she was owed...Right. Sure. That makes sense only if Oma tried to give her another personal check. I'd have insisted on Cashiers or Cash myself too!
And now the "gay people just think differently" thing? Oy vey. Well, they say the Criminal Mind thinks differently from non criminal people, so maybe that explains Oma Hamou's behavior.
Lord, screaming like rats on a sinking ship...oh Wait...right.
Hello, dears. I've had a quiet day at home honoring the memory of that wonderful Dr. King. From such poor beginnings to have gone on to bring the plight of colored people to the world's attention without writing a single bad check or having once gotten a current account mixed up with a closed account. It really makes on think, doesn't it, dears?
The History Channel ran the most heart-warming documentary this morning on the four young colored men in Greensboro who went to Woolworth's for lunch in 1960. It wasn't long before colored people everywhere were having lunch wherever they wanted. Oh, so many wonderful things have occurred around food, my pets. I can't tell you the poor scam victims I've been able to help with a good watercress sandwich, a glass of lemonade, and a stern warning about taking personal checks from dirty blondes anywhere west of the Mississippi.
Dear gentle Ms P,
You make a wonderful point. Just take what 'team hamou' wrote about "gays" and insert "African Americans" and you see what lunacy it is...
"I have friends who are African Americans"..."My brother married an "African American"..."I too have both family members and friends who are African American. They are very nice, caring people" "I have a Black best friend who for years worked closely along side of me. He was one of the nicest people you will ever meet. Oma had a very close friend whom she loved as one of her best friends, who has tragically passed away, who was African American,"
You can see the hyocritical agenda of discrimination/hate speech just dripping when you read this. Changing the pronoun makes not a shred difference in the meaning. As I clearly just demonstrated
So. . . .now would not be a good time to drop that my gay brother is going to go to jail and that he's always thought differently???
Russophile,
For the very first time, I have to admit, THAT was funny. Seriously, made me laugh.
Illuminati, I'm sorry I did not get your message earlier. Silly Lord and Master -- I accidentally took the key with me to the Intergalat ... er, the Western U.S. conference on surveillance techniques. It was a fascinating weekend, full of very useful seminars. My favorites were "When Only a Wide Angle Lens Will Do" and "What the Shoes Tell".
I'll come and unlock the manacl ... er, the mittens as soon as I refuel the spaceshi ... er, the Gremlin.
Sorry for the slips. I've still got a headache from the "How to Tell a Mercedes from a Ford" seminar.
Your Lord and Master,
The Grand Shovel
Thanks for finally getting the key to us, O Mighty Shovel. Illuminati can't post because his wrists are swollen, so I thought I would take this opportunity to say hello, and thanks for hiring me as a minion, and that I hope you're doing well up there, I mean, at headquarters.
A small problem. Illuminati said that I was now on official payroll, and I guess you can appreciate how much that meant to me after my last employment when I was subsisting on spare Cheetos and leftover cat food. I was pretty thrilled when Illuminati gave me an actual check for my first week's salary, and it kind of made up for the fact that I was basically skitching on the back of a car while some fat woman was taking my picture and screaming "we've got you NOW, you stalker!" And I've had to feed Illuminati for the past couple of days until we got the key, and he's kind of a picky eater, but I'M NOT COMPLAINING, O MIGHT SHOVEL! I've worked for worse.
But there is a small problem, and I am hoping you can take care of it for me. The check that Illuminati gave me kind of . . . well, bounced, to put it bluntly. The bank called and told me that it was written on a Thetan account that was already closed out, something about a "payment for Suri's conception", whatever that means. And I told Illuminati, but he was in a really bad mood because of the manacles and everything, and he said to take it up with you, O Great Lord of the Outer Rings.
So is there any way that you can get me a good check? Because I have some bills coming due, nothing major, but I would like to take care of them in a timely manner because I don't like to fall behind, UNLIKE SOME PEOPLE I COULD NAME BUT WON'T.
Can I expect a check tomorrow, O Keeper of the Flame of Haagen-Daz?
Your faithful Minion,
Daryn
Omele, darling ---
Can I make a suggestion without getting one of your snippy little responses? If you don't want people to think you are anti-gay and anti-Jewish, take down the verstunkene posts that are all over your forum. Otherwise all people have to do to see the truth of the charge is to read your forum. Which of course nobody does aside from you and us, but still, darling, who knows? You may steal another screenplay from someone and try to market it, and what happens if the studios google your name, darling?
Just trying to help.
Mitzi Kedem
"Mitzi Shitzy"? "Sadistic parasite"?
Darling, you didn't eat something sweet and breathe like I advised you before. Try it, you'll feel better.
Hugs, darling,
Mitzi (Kedem, darling, not "Shitzy". Kedem.)
Minion wannabe Harrington, I was prepared to give you a good check, or cash even, until I read a website on which you once posted. As it was full of insane huma ... er, peopl ... er figments, I am not prepared to have you accept a good check of mine.
Besides, Illuminati does not have the authority to write checks on my Thet ... er, Chase bank account no matter what he told you. I hope he didn't try that story on you about the sci-fi idea he is having made into a graphic novel for which he has already hired the artists, printers, publicists, and landed a big distribution deal in Latvia. Or the story of the trust fund that can only be accessed for comic books. That one is a hoot. I can't tell you how many nights we've all laughed around the anti-matter fuel cell over it.
His Lord and Master (not yours),
The Grand Shovel
I have finally had a chance to catch up on the soap opera. I'm flying home tonight after productive meetings. It will be nice to be home.
I think you may be exaggerating the level of her homophobia and anti-Semitism, people. Or at least the root causes. Her dislike of certain kinds of people seems to be strictly ad hominem. In other words, if Rob and Bob were Ethiopian, she would thereby make pronouncements about what Ethiopians are "like". Same thing with Jews, Mitzi. Hence the statements about the "nice" gays and Jews she has as "friends".
You also want to remember that Oma Hamou is not very well educated and that, combined with what is probably narcissistic personality disorder, prevents her from seeing reality in a more objective fashion. In layman's terms? Oma isn't very bright, and that shows up in the disorder of her life, to say nothing of the posted attempts at profundity by the alter-egos on her forum.
Someone emailed me and asked "Isn't Mike Newson a Mormon? Are ALL Mormon's perverts who take soft core porn pics of under age girls and aid and abet criminal activity including the threat of harm to others?"
I have friends who are Mormons..My sister married a Mormon..."I too have both family members and friends who are Mormons. They are very nice, caring people "I have Mormon best friend who for years worked closely along side of me. He was one of the nicest people you will ever meet. Bob had a very close friend who he loved as one of his best friends, who has tragically passed away, who was Mormon.
However, it has been shown that a Mormon does think differently than one who has a different Religious orientation. It's that Book of theirs, with the different beliefs of what is right and wrong, the polygamy thing. It does not mean anything as such, just that you can not compare what Mike Newson would do with say a Jewish person. Their minds just do not work the same. This is neither good nor bad it just is...
You just have to be aware of the differences.
One person does not make an entire group, and stating that Mike Newson is a pervert and conspired to a crime with Oma does not in any way pertain to any other people who happen to be Mormon.
Now,I think that the behavior of Mike Newson, his "friend", and his cronies is disgusting. Fortunately, I know that they are the exceptions rather than the rule for people of any catagory that they fit into.
I come to the Mormon communities defense because of a specific question to make sure that what they do, is not applied as a label on the whole community of Mormons.
O Mighty Shovel!
I went to Minion Daryn today with another check (and a fruit basket!) and he refused to take it! In fact he called the cops! Luckily I had someone there with a video camera to film me trying to pay Minion Daryn and him refusing to accept it, and the cops were totally on my side, O Lord of the Hissy Fit, but somehow I wound up in jail for a few hours! Why do the po-po have to beat the minion down? They only released me after the Grand Examiner of Thet--- I mean, attorney --- arrived from the Mother Shi --- I mean office.
Also, it is not a "story" about the screenplay! Why would you tell Minion Daryn that???? I have had myself photographed as a space alien (not as hard as you might think, by the way) and photoshopped little Latvian flags behind me! It's going to be an ad in all of the trade papers! I have even gotten NASA to sign on as a coproducer by restoring a bathroom at the Johnson Space Center.
It has always been my dream to become a film producer after my career as a minion ended. I was an incredibly successful minion, and I know that with my minion experience I could be an incredbily successful film producer!
So help a minion out with a couple of thousand bucks, OMS.
Your faithful minion,
Illuminati
Illuminati, I don't have time for your minion matters right now. The screens in the spaceshi ... er, the gatehouse control room are lighting up like Schnordrunffmas trees.
There are legions of police convering on Austin, Texas in the United States from all directions as I write. I see Homeland Security vans, black Crown Victorias with men in suits, Austin Police cars with their lights flashing, and some suntanned guy in a motorhome with Utah plates and a badge stuck to the windshield.
My calculations show their trajectories will bring them all together in a quiet neighborhood at a house with a statue in the yard and a gilded crown mounted on the chimney.
The radio traffic I'm picking up indicates the law enforcement agencies are responding to a complaint from a woman in California known by the code name "Blackhose". She claims that Austin is the center of a vast homosexual conspiracy to stop "Blackhose" from accidentally getting her checkbooks mixed up whenever she owes someone money or whenever she needs to stage an accident, injury, illness, anxiety attack, abortion, or traffic jam to avoid a civil or criminal court appearance.
If anyone knows the homosexuals in question, you'd better tell them ro run for the hills now, before they get surrounded. I can tell from the urgency of the radio traffic that these cops mean BUSINESS.
Its been fun watching "snoopy" log into post.Then log out and "sandman" logs in to post. then right after "Mike" logs in to post.
Beckele, you are probably somewhere over the ocean right now, but have a safe flight.
Rob, have a "Bravo" right back at you for the post about the "Mormons". And of course she missed the point. It wasn't aimed at "Mike", Omele, it was aimed at you because you post as Mike. And "Snoopy" and all of the other figments, darling.
So have the police arrested you boys yet? I guess not, because you're still posting, Robbele. But keep us posted.
And what is "sadistic", the word of the day or something? You're sadistic, I'm sadistic, everyone is sadistic. Oy gewalt. We're not hurting you darling, we're laughing at you. Unless you seriously believe that everything that has happened to you is the direct result of Rob Moshein and Bob Atchison. Whcih of course you probably do.
A cupcake, darling. Have one. You can carry it.
Still posting, still caring and yes, still laughing, darling.
Mitzi Kedem
And one more thing, darling. The post Rob put up just before my last one may indeed show that he is watching your forum (you callit "stalking"). But it also shows that one person is posting as "Snoopy", "Mike" and "Sandman". I have seen it blip between "Handmaiden" and "Snoopy" myself. Who could that one person be, darling?
Oops. Try harder.
Mitzele. Like a spy, I am!
So far peaceful, quiet, sunny and warm day here in Austin. Low 70s, clear sky light breeze. Beautiful. Will be taking the dogs to the park. No "police" converging on us. Not even a phone call. In fact, earlier this afternoon there was a crazy homeless guy wandering in traffic by the freeway on ramp, and I called 911 to report it before he got hit. Gave them my full name and everything. They were so very nice and helpful.
Rob, first the fruit basket and now helping the homeless! What a mensch you are, darling! A mensch
Mitzi
You are so right Mitzele.
Let's face it, "team hamou" is more entertaining and hilarious than Jay Leno and Conan. The silly characters, with common grammar problems, the claims that defy reason, the constant excuses, the constant unsupported allegations (we have VIDEO of Mrs Batchelor refusing to take her money is my favorite knee slapper of late). The constant threats of "imminent law enforcement swooping down on me and Bob that never manages to happen, the lawsuits that will be filed "this week" for EVERY WEEK OF FIVE YEARS...
The claims of being an "actress" and "model" that will only be proven to "those with a need to know" as if its some state secret...
The constant excuses WHY her constant criminal and civil court appearances are NEVER her fault.
Yes, Oma Hamou and her "friends" are hilarious, laughable, insanely funny in their utter stupidity, attempts at appearing educated and profound, DEMANDING to be taken seriously... yet team hamou remains always and ever utterly stupid and clueless...
They provide many people with a constant source of entertainment, far more than they know...but I hear from those people who LOVE to see what new farce team hamou manages to come up with.
Don't forget the spelling errors that Russo exemplifies due to her ADD/dyslexia.
Well, dearest Russophile, we don't make fun of handicaps here. Actually, I guess we do if they manifest in southern California. That delightfully catty Mr. Truman Capote claimed that one loses 2 points of IQ for every year lived in California. By my reckoning that puts Ms. Hamou/McConnell down 60 points from her starting score. That would bring a genius down to average, and an average person down to, well, shall we say "prone to disturbing behavior and inadvertent revelations"?
With a model/actress with a long-standing propensity for mixing up checkbooks and a recent accidental suing of herself, the dear Lord Himself must despair of her reason.
Okay, now I'm as confused as Penelope. (Sorry, Penny dear.)
Hamou posts what she claims is the original invoice from Bob Atchison instead of one he forged. But here's the problem: the invoice she posted as authentic is for exactly the amount Atchison sued her for. In other words, his claim in court was for exactly what Hamou herself says he was invoicing her for.
Then she goes on to post an e-mail from Michael Edwards, who was Atchison's business partner at Pallasart. In that e-mail, Edwards is notifying Hamou that she is in arrears on fees for the web hosting services Pallasart was providing her. Edwards goes on to say that, given her delinquency in paying Atchison for his personal consulting services as well as her repeated failure to pay Pallasart for web hosting, the web hosting services will be terminated if she doesn't pay within a certain amount of time.
This gives the lie to Hamou's claim that Atichson was intent on destroying her business in any and every way possible. If he was intent on destroying her business, why didn't he take the first opportunity to shut down her website when she missed the first payment? Why let the arrears build up? Why send her correspondence repeatedly requesting payment? Why give her a further notice period and opportunity to pay up before finally shutting her down?
Let's face it. The woman is insane. It's as if she claimed that she opened her closet and found three elephants and a giraffe standing inside and then screams that anyone who doesn't believe her is a liar, fraud, defamer, stalker, and overall villain.
Who in her right mind would post the very documents that belie her own arguments, and then claim that they mean exactly the opposite of what they clearly mean?
Stark. Raving. Mad.
To no one's surprise, the above post unleashed a new round of explosions on Hamou's "Ask Oma" forum.
Let's get down to brass tacks about why Oma Hamou has been chasing Bob Atchison and Rob Moshein around the internet for years, trying to paint them as the villains in her scheme gone wrong.
Hamou's big film project was nothing more than a Ponzi scheme. She might well have actually intended to make a movie, but in the absence of any financial support she decided to start anyway. She began enlisting people for pre-production work and services, claiming to each that she had vast resources behind her: a huge trust fund, a big charity for monument restoration, a fully-staffed production company, studio facilities, a Dun & Bradstreet stamp of approval, a mature ad and promotional campaign.
In fact, these things either did not exist or had been obtained under false pretenses. She apparently hoped that she could build a convincing enough facade of a serious film project that she could then obtain the funding which, in turn, she would use to pay for the services already rendered. It is this fundamental sequencing of things that, in essence, turned the whole project into a Ponzi scheme.
Would it have worked? It was never more than a long shot, as most proposed films -- even those attempted by people of real talent -- never get off the ground, even when launched by people who know something about what they are doing. But those projects involve people who know the risk they are taking, not people who have been lied to about financial backing and the true state of the project.
So why all this mania about the role Atchison and Moshein played in her scheme's breaking down? Simple. By enlisting Atchison to help her establish relationships in Russia, she put him in the predicament of becoming party to her Ponzi scheme. Once he realized it, he had no responsible choice but to blow the whistle on her. And for that, he will always be -- in her estimation -- the man who destroyed her dream.
It did not matter to her that the dream was from its very beginning built on lies and deceit; that it pulled people in without disclosing to them the risk they were taking; that it compromised their own financial affairs, their credit histories, and their professional reputations in pursuit of her dream. Nothing matters to this woman but herself.
That is why today, rather than seeking gainful employment, she continues to "accidentally" grab the wrong checkbook, to claim she "thought" she had the authority of other people to use their credit, to pretend that all the police and D.A.'s whose paths she continues to cross actually become her avid sympathizers once they understand her ill-handling at the hands of Atchison and Moshein.
Meanwhile, she continues her unrelenting campaign to destroy them with her constant claims that they are under police investigation, that they are about to be arrested, that they are violating restraining orders, that they are forgers and perjurers, that she is going to sue them and win this time.
And meanwhile, she continues to be the one with numerous outstanding civil judgments, with a felony conviction history, with a recent felony forgery arrest, with a warrant in L.A. county outstanding against her.
We'll tell this tale as long as she persists in her endeavor to destroy Atchison and Moshein. We'll put the real record out there for all to see and compare her claims of what is about to happen to Moshein and Atchison to what has actually happened to her.
Dear Blake and all,
Just waking up, and am frankly a little loggy from jet lag. But I have a cup of coffee, and I just read the enormous posts she has been putting up. I read the long diatribe from last night where she takes on Bob Atchison. I read it with careful attention, and I have to say, Blake, you have succeeded in pithily blowing her out of the water. I have long thought that she counts upon us not reading these mammoth strings of "official" documents, but instead being deluged under the electronic "mound of paper". If we don't read them, we don't see that she is contradicting herself. In fact, what she posts rarely --- if ever --- support her positions in regard to Atchison. She was caught when she tried to pass as current emails from Markell that had the dates whited out; enough remained that they were obviously nearly a decade old.
It is a classic Ponzi scheme, and contrary to her assertions about how films are made, this is not how it is done. But it is consonant with the way in which she lives her life, always teetering on the verge of (and occasionally collapsing into) utter chaos.
I go back to my statement from yesterday, which now seems like a million years ago. I think she does believe in her fantasy about how her "film project" collapsed. I also think that she is clearly in mental distress, which a polite way of saying cuckoo.
Rob, thanks for the email with the precis of the past few days. In answer to your question, it is indeed one hell of a tall building. You can't go anywhere without seeing the damned thing.
Later, gators.
Rebecca
Questions to ask Oma Hamou aka Alexandra McConnell:
Did you disclose IN ADVANCE to NTT Verio that they would have to wait for payment for website design until your film was funded?
Did you disclose IN ADVANCE to American Express that they would not get paid for hundreds of thousands of dollars of charges UNTIL your "film" was FUNDED?
Did you disclose to Global Insight IN ADVANCE to ordering the "economic impact report" that they would not get paid until your "film" was FUNDED?
Did you disclose IN ADVANCE to Variety and Daily Variety, BEFORE YOU contracted for over $100,000 of ADVERTISING that you could NOT PAY FOR THAT $100,000 OF ADVERTISING UNLESS AND UNTIL YOUR FILM WAS FUNDED? Did they understand and accept that risk in advance??
These are simple, yes or no answers. They don't require a twenty thousand word screeching response...
yes you did, and you post the documents to prove it, or no you "forgot" to tell them that....which is it?
YOU CLAIM that you "would have paid these debts when the film was funded" so YES OR NO, did you tell these people UP FRONT of this fact BEFORE they agreed to provide goods and services?
Oh, and RJ,
Yeah, that damn building looked HUGE on the News reports....Thanks and welcome home. Hopefully you flew business class, that's a long flight back.
Rob, "Handmaiden" answered your prior post on the other forum with this:
"First of all Rob Moshein, you know very well that Oma is not posting on this site, so it is nothing short of insanity for you to directly address her on anything."
The stupid byotch is forgetting that the very title of her forum is ... wait for it .......
"ASK OMA"!
Of course, you'll shortly get a reply that Oma is too busy with her grand projects to pay attention to her forum any more, or Oma is afraid to post because you are stalking her with mayhem on your mind, or she's too tied up with her attorneys who are preparing a barrage of lawsuits against you.
And you'll be curtly informed that you "know very well" whichever absurd ruse she tries to float is the TRUTH.
Talk about insanity.
Spot on again Blake.
I KNEW Oma Hamou would refuse to answer these questions, and refuse to answer ANY questions.
As a result, I WILL REFUSE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTION FROM "TEAM HAMOU" henceforth until these specific questions are answered yes or no and proven.
So don't ask, I won't answer. YOU can't write the rules.
Business class all the way. My internal clock is screwed up, as it always is after a trip over and back, but thats the price you pay. As a side note, do you know what's depressing? That building was put up in something like six years, and we still can't get something going down at the WTC site in nine.
Meanwhile, over in Omaland. She has just posted as "Handmaiden" and is playing dodgeball. At no point in your post did you characterize the people and companies she grifted for her "film project" as "investors". The question is simple: did she knowingly engage companies' services with the knowledge that she would not be able to pay the bills? I think the sorry record of judgments is the answer. As a businesswoman, Oma, you are either a knave or an idiot. Or perhaps a nicely balanced mixture of the two.
Also, sweetheart, you are starting to lose your grip these past few days. The figments are all beginning to sound alike. Mike is screeching like Snoopy, and Handmaiden's spelling and grammar is shot to hell, not that it was all that great at any point.
But thanks for bringing my boyfriend Daryn back into play!
I also wanted to mention how much I enjoyed the email excoriating Atchison that you sent back in the day that ended with the word touche. Gee, that sounded familiar.
RJ
Thanks for sending the last post RJ. You are so right that it IS a shame that so little has happened at WTC in almost 9 years.
Let me be CLEAR. I am NOT trying to "coerce" anything from "team hamou'. They make a simple assertion regularly: ie: Oma Hamou WOULD have PAID her debts HAD her "film" been funded. The questions I asked are simple and relate directly to this assertion. WERE those companies, for whatever goods and services were provided, TOLD IN ADVANCE that Oma Hamou and/or her "companies" COULD NOT PAY THE BILLS UNLESS THE FILM WAS FUNDED???
This is not 'coercion' rather it is a simple basic and rational, logical point related directly to the assertion they made. Yes or no. Its easy. Four questions, yes or no?
IF Oma Hamou refuses to answer, one must of course ask WHY?
Snoopy/Oma posted:
"No idiot the title of this thread is "Rob Moshein & His Lis [sic]".
Good grief, Snoopy/Oma, when your arguments get this frail you take all the fun out of riling you.
The entire forum -- on which the thread in question is but one of many -- is entitled at the top of the page, "Oma Hamou / Ask Oma".
Basically, you're saying that the "Ask Oma" forum is not a place to ask Oma anything and is not even a site to which she pays any attention. I would call that false advertising. A concept with which you have a storied history.
Questions to ask Oma Hamou aka Alexandra McConnell:
Did you disclose IN ADVANCE to NTT Verio that they would have to wait for payment for website design until your film was funded?
Did you disclose IN ADVANCE to American Express that they would not get paid for hundreds of thousands of dollars of charges UNTIL your "film" was FUNDED?
Did you disclose to Global Insight IN ADVANCE to ordering the "economic impact report" that they would not get paid until your "film" was FUNDED?
Did you disclose IN ADVANCE to Variety and Daily Variety, BEFORE YOU contracted for over $100,000 of ADVERTISING that you could NOT PAY FOR THAT $100,000 OF ADVERTISING UNLESS AND UNTIL YOUR FILM WAS FUNDED? Did they understand and accept that risk in advance??
These are simple, yes or no answers. They don't require a twenty thousand word screeching response...
yes you did, and you post the documents to prove it, or no you "forgot" to tell them that....which is it?
YOU CLAIM that you "would have paid these debts when the film was funded" so YES OR NO, did you tell these people UP FRONT of this fact BEFORE they agreed to provide goods and services?
I am NOT trying to "coerce" anything from "team hamou'. They make a simple assertion regularly: ie: Oma Hamou WOULD have PAID her debts HAD her "film" been funded. The questions I asked are simple and relate directly to this assertion. WERE those companies, for whatever goods and services were provided, TOLD IN ADVANCE that Oma Hamou and/or her "companies" COULD NOT PAY THE BILLS UNLESS THE FILM WAS FUNDED???
This is not 'coercion' rather it is a simple basic and rational, logical point related directly to the assertion they made. Yes or no. Its easy. Four questions, yes or no?
IF Oma Hamou refuses to answer, one must of course ask WHY?
She thinks she is entitled to do anything she wants to do. She always has.
Questions to ask Oma Hamou aka Alexandra McConnell:
Did you disclose IN ADVANCE to NTT Verio that they would have to wait for payment for website design until your film was funded?
Did you disclose IN ADVANCE to American Express that they would not get paid for hundreds of thousands of dollars of charges UNTIL your "film" was FUNDED?
Did you disclose to Global Insight IN ADVANCE to ordering the "economic impact report" that they would not get paid until your "film" was FUNDED?
Did you disclose IN ADVANCE to Variety and Daily Variety, BEFORE YOU contracted for over $100,000 of ADVERTISING that you could NOT PAY FOR THAT $100,000 OF ADVERTISING UNLESS AND UNTIL YOUR FILM WAS FUNDED? Did they understand and accept that risk in advance??
These are simple, yes or no answers. They don't require a twenty thousand word screeching response...
yes you did, and you post the documents to prove it, or no you "forgot" to tell them that....which is it?
YOU CLAIM that you "would have paid these debts when the film was funded" so YES OR NO, did you tell these people UP FRONT of this fact BEFORE they agreed to provide goods and services?
I am NOT trying to "coerce" anything from "team hamou'. They make a simple assertion regularly: ie: Oma Hamou WOULD have PAID her debts HAD her "film" been funded. The questions I asked are simple and relate directly to this assertion. WERE those companies, for whatever goods and services were provided, TOLD IN ADVANCE that Oma Hamou and/or her "companies" COULD NOT PAY THE BILLS UNLESS THE FILM WAS FUNDED???
This is not 'coercion' rather it is a simple basic and rational, logical point related directly to the assertion they made. Yes or no. Its easy. Four questions, yes or no?
IF Oma Hamou refuses to answer, one must of course ask WHY?
Questions to ask Oma Hamou aka Alexandra McConnell:
Did you disclose IN ADVANCE to NTT Verio that they would have to wait for payment for website design until your film was funded?
Did you disclose IN ADVANCE to American Express that they would not get paid for hundreds of thousands of dollars of charges UNTIL your "film" was FUNDED?
Did you disclose to Global Insight IN ADVANCE to ordering the "economic impact report" that they would not get paid until your "film" was FUNDED?
Did you disclose IN ADVANCE to Variety and Daily Variety, BEFORE YOU contracted for over $100,000 of ADVERTISING that you could NOT PAY FOR THAT $100,000 OF ADVERTISING UNLESS AND UNTIL YOUR FILM WAS FUNDED? Did they understand and accept that risk in advance??
These are simple, yes or no answers. They don't require a twenty thousand word screeching response...
yes you did, and you post the documents to prove it, or no you "forgot" to tell them that....which is it?
YOU CLAIM that you "would have paid these debts when the film was funded" so YES OR NO, did you tell these people UP FRONT of this fact BEFORE they agreed to provide goods and services?
I am NOT trying to "coerce" anything from "team hamou'. They make a simple assertion regularly: ie: Oma Hamou WOULD have PAID her debts HAD her "film" been funded. The questions I asked are simple and relate directly to this assertion. WERE those companies, for whatever goods and services were provided, TOLD IN ADVANCE that Oma Hamou and/or her "companies" COULD NOT PAY THE BILLS UNLESS THE FILM WAS FUNDED???
This is not 'coercion' rather it is a simple basic and rational, logical point related directly to the assertion they made. Yes or no. Its easy. Four questions, yes or no?
IF Oma Hamou refuses to answer, one must of course ask WHY?
Questions to ask Oma Hamou aka Alexandra McConnell:
Did you disclose IN ADVANCE to NTT Verio that they would have to wait for payment for website design until your film was funded?
Did you disclose IN ADVANCE to American Express that they would not get paid for hundreds of thousands of dollars of charges UNTIL your "film" was FUNDED?
Did you disclose to Global Insight IN ADVANCE to ordering the "economic impact report" that they would not get paid until your "film" was FUNDED?
Did you disclose IN ADVANCE to Variety and Daily Variety, BEFORE YOU contracted for over $100,000 of ADVERTISING that you could NOT PAY FOR THAT $100,000 OF ADVERTISING UNLESS AND UNTIL YOUR FILM WAS FUNDED? Did they understand and accept that risk in advance??
These are simple, yes or no answers. They don't require a twenty thousand word screeching response...
yes you did, and you post the documents to prove it, or no you "forgot" to tell them that....which is it?
YOU CLAIM that you "would have paid these debts when the film was funded" so YES OR NO, did you tell these people UP FRONT of this fact BEFORE they agreed to provide goods and services?
I am NOT trying to "coerce" anything from "team hamou'. They make a simple assertion regularly: ie: Oma Hamou WOULD have PAID her debts HAD her "film" been funded. The questions I asked are simple and relate directly to this assertion. WERE those companies, for whatever goods and services were provided, TOLD IN ADVANCE that Oma Hamou and/or her "companies" COULD NOT PAY THE BILLS UNLESS THE FILM WAS FUNDED???
This is not 'coercion' rather it is a simple basic and rational, logical point related directly to the assertion they made. Yes or no. Its easy. Four questions, yes or no?
IF Oma Hamou refuses to answer, one must of course ask WHY?
I'm sorry guys, but I will keep posting and re posting these questions until they are answered. This is the essence of Oma Hamou's response to these debts and these answers are fundamental. They will be repeated until addressed.
Handmaiden/Oma, you are really flailing here.
In an attempt to dodge the issue that you are posting on a forum titled "Ask Oma", you keep twisting and writhing.
Last night you posted:
"Oh yes, and the post was not made on the Ask Oma forum, but on the libelous, defamatory Rob Moshein blog."
In fact, the post I quoted where you called it insanity to expect Oma to answer anything on a forum titled "Ask Oma" was posted by you on that forum at 5:51 p.m. on January 20.
And Rob -- as for your plan to keep posting the same set of embarrassing questions until Hamou answers them, Buzz Lightyear's famous tagline springs to mind:
"TO INFINITY AND BEYOND!"
"Buzz Lightyear"? I looked it up. How on earth do I keep missing all of the hip cultural references?
And of course she is not going to answer the questions, Rob. What can she say? "Well, if I had told them I wasn't planning to pay them they might not have provided the services?"
Exactly.
Seriously, I would have liked to meet the crack staff of Enigma Films back in the day (and trust me, it is an effort not to start riffing on the word "Enigma" in the company's title). Didn't she claim at some point that her company had multiple employees and was housed in a large office building? Or would that have happened if the movie had been made?
She's all over the map trying to avoid these questions, which sounds pretty much how she behaved during the trial with Atchison and the hearings with Batchelor; anything to avoid confronting hard reality.
And she is still slipping as the puppet master. In her latest post as Snoopy she inadvertently sounds like "Mike" until she remembers that she is posting about "Mike", and then reverts to the third person.
I have to say, she has reignited the interest of our legal department with the whole "this is how business operates" motif. As one of our associates said, "no, this is how people like Bernie Madoff operate."
RJ
I know full well Oma Hamou will never fess up and answer these questions. She can't, the answer (which is obviously "no") would belie her con game and expose what she does.
She never told Bob "I can't pay you until the film is funded" She said, in front of me at my dining room table eating my home made Beef Stroganoff "the picture is fully funded. My ex husband left me a trust fund when we divorced which is funding the movie". Then came the dozens of excuses why the check never arrived. The empty Fedex envelope, the receipt for "overnight mail" that turned out to be for buying a book of stamps...a stay in Cedars Sinai Hospital that my Dad who was on staff there proved didn't happen..etc
She never told Boardrush she couldn't pay until the film was funded. In fact, she signed a contract which required a sizeable up front non-refundable retainer payment for their services. She strung them along with empty promises to pay that retainer, while they did work, and it was only when they stopped until she paid, that it all hit the fan. I have a copy of the contract, it was part of the Boardrush lawsuit which they won because she never showed up or responded.
She never told Global Insight she couldn't pay until the film was funded. I had a LONG conversation with Jacqueline Anker their attorney. She made tons of empty promises to pay, for the "economic impact report" she contracted for, payment that never materialised of course.
She never told the marketing guy at Variety/Daily Variety she couldn't pay until the film was funded. Turns out he was a good friend of a friend of Bob's. We had several LONG conversations with him too. She managed to come up with one first check for $10,000 to establish "credibility" when Oma said the film was fully funded, so they extended her the terms for the $100,000 in further advertising she rang up. She NEVER told Variety they would have to wait and hope the film would be funded at some point...
She never told Foster Malish & Blair she couldn't pay until the film was funded. I have the emails Chris Malish sent to the Court where Oma was stringing him along on the $20,000 she owed them, until he had to cut her loose as a client because his little boutique law firm couldn't support such losses...
I'm sure she never told Mrs. Batchelor she couldn't pay either. She just "grabbed the wrong checkbook" to try to buy time. Except that time the District Attorney was on to her scam and held her feet to the fire to get her to pay the poor woman, unlike AmEx, Boardrush, Bob, Global Insight, NTT Verio, Reed Elsevier, Chris Malish and the three other law firms she stiffed....who all never saw a dime of the money Oma Hamou PROMISED to pay them.
Anyone can see the con for what it is...and that IS what it is.
I haven't laughed this hard in years, darlings! Her latest post as "Snoopy" is the funniest thing I have ever read. She says that the judge questioned what had been done for the 200,000 by the firm suing her, as though this was some kind of statement in support of Oma Hamou. Of course, the same person rendered judgment against Omele, so I suppose he was convinced something had been done.
Honest to G-d, Omele you don't just live in a castle in the sky when it comes to reality, you have vast tracts of rental property there.
Rebecca, I'm glad you made it home. Do me a favor, darling, and email me particulars about the hotel? It's unlikely someone with my passport is ever going to stay there, but I'm curious.
Mitzi
Rob, once again Hamou is relying on people abandoning their common sense in order to accept her hare-brained explanations.
The simple fact is that companies do not waste time and money suing people who have complied with the terms of payment agreements. If these companies had provided services on the understanding that payment was to be contingent on her subsequently obtaining funding, they would not have sued her and obtained judgments against her. If fact, they never would have provided the services in the first place had she not misrepresented her ability to pay.
Hamou's constant refrain that we "don't understand how business works" -- while she, in contrast, does -- makes sense only if one buys her absurd argument that getting sued and losing over a dozen times is part of the normal course of running a project.
A check-writing grift might be a viable, if seedy, way to make a feeble living off gullible victims. It's a bit harder to run without consequences against seasoned business people. Hence the long string of lost lawsuits and scrapes with the police.
Will do, Mitzi. You thought the post was funny? I thought it was desperate.
Exactly, Blake. I can't believe that someone with Oma Hamou's legal track record is "explaining" how business works. It's like the captain of the Titanic giving navigation classes.
RJ
I told you, darlings. Chutzpah. Spelled H-A-M-O-U.
Darling Oma,
A judge also wrote in his own hand that you owed Bob Atchison a lot of money. Unlike the "restraining" order you keep referring to, that hasn't expired.
Just a thought, darling.
Still caring. Still laughing.
Mitzele
It's like she thinks the entire legal system is a collection of whims. First of all, she has no idea what a Bill of Review actually is, according to every lawyer I have asked about this. Second, whatever she thinks it is, she hadn't filed it until midnight of the last possible day, which means she basically ignored a court judgment for years because she didn't think it was fair, an option I wish I'd had with the speeding ticket on I got in Greenwich in 1998. I'm telling you. Narcissistic personality disorder, textbook case.
Also, Oma, every time you say "Quit lying!" God kills a kitten to punish you for hypocrisy. Think about that.
RJ
And Mitzi, when Hamou endlessly crows that Judge Livingston's restraining order said she had a liklihood of succeeding at trial, Hamou conveniently forgets that such a legal recitation is required for a judge to issue a temporary restraining order -- and that what always underpins the order is the condition that the complaint used to obtain the order eventually has to be PROVEN IN COURT to sustain the order.
The reason the restraining order expired is that Hamou never managed to prove her allegations in court, where real rules of evidence apply rather than just a frustrated woman's melodramatic moans and shrieks.
Blake,
So smart you are, a legal maven! Oma should get you to represent her.
It couldn't hurt.
Mitzi
Lest anyone accuse me of not posting docs to support what I say, or to accuse me of making stuff up, I posted the emails from Chris Malish to Oma Hamou where she had promised to pay them but never did. These were the support evidence submitted to the Court when they withdrew from representing here. Enjoy:
http://www.omahamoureport.org/Withdraw3.jpg
http://www.omahamoureport.org/Withdraw4.jpg
Oh, oh dear. I'm almost too upset to write this.
I came here to report to you all that dear, sweet Mewlie Fishbreath keeled over this morning from unexplained causes. She was just starting to bury her recent visit to the litter box when she suddenly let out a piercing meow and dropped like a wet rag.
Mr. Autumnvale, meaning only the best, tried to administer mouth-to-mouth to her, but I think he blew too hard. Her chest expanded grotesquely before he realized it and made this sickening cracking sound.
The poor, poor dear is gone. Every time I look at the litter box, I just burst into tears all over again.
And now I come here to find that sweet Rebecca, whom I have always so admired, might have (inadvertently, I'm sure) called this curse down on my darling, dear Mewlie.
Ohhhhh ... oooooohhhhhhhhhh. What am I to do without my Mewlie Fishbreath? What am I to do?
Ohhhhh ... oooooohhhhhhhhhh.
Oh Penelope, it wasn't me! She keeps saying "quit lying!" and it is annoying God, and you know how He is. Ask Pat Robertson! Somebody has to pay, even if it is a kitten!!!!
Maybe . . . maybe if she says she's sorry and we all clap our hands, maybe Mewlie will come back to life!
It worked for Tinkerbell!
I hasten to add that no kittens were harmed during the making of this joke, and with her usual sense of humor, Oma thinks I was serious.
Dumb and humorless. But a snappy dresser!
RJ
Oy, does she try to talk her way out of everything. I swear to G-d, Omele, you are too funny. First of all, the whole business about how the figments aren't you. Darling, be serious. For the past two days, even you couldn't keep their personalities straight. And before you post about what a genius Oma has to be to do this, think of it as a con. Of course you're good at it, darling, you've had a lot of practice. But it is now kind of like when the Ponzi scheme with the movie started to fly apart. You can't keep your stories straight, darling, and the cracks begin to appear. Just as they are doing now.
You're not refusing to answer Rob's questions because he didn't ask them on your forum, you're refusing to answer them because there is no credible response to a question like "Did you tell Amex that their payment for services was dependent upon whether your movie got made?" that isn't yes, darling. But of course you didn't, which makes you . . .well, darling, I hate to say this, but it makes you a crook.
Screaming about the restraining order that never went into effect because you never showed up for the case, and how you have the right to break a contract because you don't feel like paying --- darling, my family owns and operates a major company (which you know because Nitzana told me she told you). I'm not the sharpest mahtzoh ball in the chicken soup, but even I know that's not how a legitimate business operates.
Darling, I post because I don't want you to appear any more foolish than you already do. And bubbele, that is pretty foolish.
Try again, Oma. For Mitzi.
Mitzi
RJ,
I'm not so sure about the "snappy dresser" part. Those six inch high chunky square heeled shiny black shoes she wore to court were what the slut characters on Dallas or Dynasty might have worn. And the cheap stone necklace thing? Local college students wear nicer.
Now, I'm not going to let "Team Hamou" take the discussion off track. Allow me to quote her own Attorney at the time, Chris Malish esq, in his emails to his client:
Monday August 1, 2005
Dear Oma,
we now find that not only is there no balance in your retainer account to cover July's work, but the bill for June's work has not yet been paid either. At this point you owe $17, 652.81 for work done in June and July. Tigh and Ryan have told me that you have promised a number of times over the past 20 days to pay for the work done so far and even indicated that the money was being (or had been) wired to us but the wire has never come through.
Wednesday August 3, 2005
Dear Oma,
I would just like to confirm our agreement reached during our conversation of yesterday. You have committed to make the necessary arrangements to wire $20,000 into our account to be received by our bank no later than Friday afternoon. Given the difficulties we have had in actually getting funds that we have been assured would be wired to us in the past, if for whatever reason our bank cannot confirm the receipt of these funds by Friday afternoon we will have to discuss whether the firm can continue to work with you
Tuesday August 9, 2005
Dear Oma,
I'm not sure what has gone awry but notwithstanding our email and telephone communications last week assuring us that we would receive a wire by the end of day Friday August 5, it has not arrived at our bank; we have not been contacted by you with any explanation of the circumstances that have resulted in the delay and you do not return our calls.
Sound familiar? Of course it does. Bob, NTT Verio, Global Insight, Boardrush, Lawyers all over, PR companies all over ALL report the same scenario when dealing with Oma Hamou and trying to get paid for goods provided and services rendered. THAT is her con game.
and here is another good document. The Minute record from Oma Hamou's arrest and time in jail for being a Felony Fugitive From Justice in 1995. Notice the Judge set her bail at $500,000! They must have felt this was very serious indeed...Well maybe her being a "no show" or "miss out" for the first hearing pissed off the Judge. enjoy.
http://www.omahamoureport.org/HamouFugitiveArrest.jpg
Amusing that every time Oma Hamou claimed to refuse to pay for services "not rendered" she LOST the lawsuits. Just FYI.
Oh and what will she do when Bob serves her with a debtor's exam, or localizes the judgment in California to attach her bank accounts? Tell the Courts Bob "lied" and they shouldn't uphold the Texas Judgment against her?? What about Boardrush?? If they find her, what will she tell THAT court when they enforce the judgment??
Those judgments are legally binding and no one has the legal authority to refuse to comply just because they are unhappy with the result.
Not even Oma Hamou.
hahahahahahahahaheheheheheheheheheh
"real stones" "custom piece"...yeah, I can go into the front yard, find "real stones" under the hedge, and string them together into a "custom piece". That would be a far more accurate representation of the junk around Oma's neck.
I won't even bother to address the other drivel from handmaiden de Sayton
In defense of stones, my mother left me her about 8 carat Alexandrite. It looks like something from a crackerjack box but it's a real Alexandrite from Russia. (Which reminds me, I have to get it appraised and insured.)
My almost 6--or is it 5?? carat Tanzanite people mistake for nothing as well. Which actually, suits me fine, the average Jane who thinks that diamonds are the be all end all have no clue what I'm wearing. And dismiss it outright.
Computer issues! Sorry Mr. Moshein, I *am* around. . .though in and out due to this fun, fun, FUN! stuff.
These are ROCKS Russo. Not gemstones cut and polished. It looks like something you find at flea markets or Sunday Crafts shows or what a 12 year old would make for mommy with the Rock tumbler he got for christmas...
Shout out going to the California Department of Social Services, you know, the food stamp/welfare folks. They seem to have a serious interest in what I've had to say of late..especially the minute orders of Alexandra McConnell's Felony Forgery proceedings.
About whether I know what six inches "is"...
The woman in the tourqoise outfit, white plastic shoes and huge out of date bluetooth in her ear that left the courthouse with Oma/Alexandra had at LEAST a six inch double chin on her very square manish looking face. Her stringy unwashed light brown hair, down below her shoulders was way more than six inches long, closer to a foot. She weighs every ounce of 275-300 pounds and at LEAST a 40 inch waist. That chick has not seen her feet without aid of a mirror in years, much less anything else below that huge belly...
What the f**k! Has anybody seen my black Ford SUV? It disappeared last Wednesday and I ain't seen it since.
I got serious advanced paralegal work to do, and I need that damn truck.
Joe
Oh, yeah. And it better not be sagging on one side when I get it back.
Joe
"Advanced Paralegal Services" we know this exists. Not made up at all...hmmmmmm veeeerrry interesting.
Did I ascribe any importance to "Advanced Paralegal Services"? Would anyone care that "Advanced Paralegal Services" had anything to do with "Oma Hamou" "Alexandra McConnell" the convicted felon, who recently faced Felony forgery charges, and who haas hundreds of thousands of dollars of judgment debt against her. Of course if she has no relationship with "Advanced Paralegal Services" these felony convictions and huge debts and judgments against OMA HAMOU AND HER ALIAS NAME ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL don't matter...
Did I ascribe any importance to "Advanced Paralegal Services"? Would anyone care that "Advanced Paralegal Services" had anything to do with "Oma Hamou" "Alexandra McConnell" the convicted felon, who recently faced Felony forgery charges, and who haas hundreds of thousands of dollars of judgment debt against her. Of course if she has no relationship with "Advanced Paralegal Services" these felony convictions and huge debts and judgments against OMA HAMOU AND HER ALIAS NAME ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL don't matter...
And now there is something called "Advanced Paralegal Services" involved in this nonsense? How?
I know what my BFF is talking about with stones, Rob, although my own necklace of stones doesn't have any great value. It is made of highly polished river stones from the Amazon; I picked it up several years ago in Rio when I was there on business. It doesn't really have any sentimental value, either; I just think it is pretty. Maybe the necklace has personal associations for Oma.
That being said, back to the business at hand. Mitzi was right when she said Oma is losing control of her "figments". "Mike" is now ranting like "Snoopy", and "Snoopy" put up a quote from --- you may all want to sit down --- Aeschylus this morning. Aeschylus. It's the business about pain dripping on the heart until at last comes wisdom through the awful grace of God.
This means that she is now comparing her "suffering" to that of a Greek tragic hero. She may want to back off the analogy, since if I remember correctly --- my last classics class was 1968 --- the suffering of a Greek tragic hero is self-inflicted.
I just went to my study and dug out an old copy of Edith Hamilton's The Greek Way.
It arises from the fatal character flaw of hubris, which is the pride that allows the tragic hero to think that he is greater than the laws of nature. It's not just conceit ("don't I look pretty jumping over the fire?" "don't I look pretty arching my back and covering the breasts for the family trade?"), but rather a pride so deep that it leads the hero into the sense that he is not bound by the rules that affect everyone else.
So yes, Oma, you are in fact a Greek tragic hero. Now the only thing left to do is learn a little wisdom, which to them meant "humility" as much as street smarts. But remember before you go scrabbling through ancient texts for support that it can bite you in the ass, girlfriend. The pain that was dripping on Oedipus' heart was caused by Oedipus' own actions. Sound familiar?
Let's try the Inferno next time!
RJ
David Tabibi, Sima Falatoon, Majid Tabibi...all DBA Advanced Paralegal Services,
so many lawsuits against them in just the last few years for Fraud, breach of contract, legal malpractice, Advanced Paralegal Services is a suspended Corporation, just like Enigma Films... my my my, these things all sound so familiar to those following Oma Hamou/Alexandra McConnell's tawdry path...
Robbele,
I would rather walk on my lips than correct you, but I think you were too nasty about the physical appearance of the poor woman in the turquoise dress. Yes, she is very overweight, and oy, she's not doing herself any favors with either the color or the fit, and don't get me started on the shoes. But it could be something glandular that is causing the heaviness.
On the other hand, the hair on the ladies. And the lack of makeup. Listen, girls, we can all benefit from a good cut and a little foundation. Think about it, is all I'm saying.
And six, three, what's the difference, Omele? Those heels are pushing you forward and making you look a little front-heavy if you know what I mean, and I think you do. Also, while the black is pretty slimming, a little color around the face would make your skin look fresher.
And oy, first I need a law degree to follow Oma's arguments and now an English degree?
Shalom, darlings!
Mitzele
Yeah, I'm with Mitzi on this one about the weight, cuz we all know that Mr. Atchison surely isn't anorexic and Mr. Russo is a big boy himself. (I think the term, a la Gabriel Iglasius is "Husky")
Back in my day, Russophile Lady, we used to say the man or woman had a little "meat on his bones". Of course, you don't want to carry a whole cow, G-d forbid. And like I said, I hate to correct Rob for this, since I know it is frustrating to listen to Omele badmouth him and Bob day after day on that verkackte forum. Anyone would snap.
Oh, dear. It is true that we should go a little easy on those with a "weight problem", as the ladies in my Bible circle call it.
Poor, dear Mr. A. is not without his love of a good sandwich, although why he sees the need to pile pastrami, ham, American cheese, and mayonnaise on one of my exquisitely-balanced watercress creations is beyond me.
And if he had just watched his weight a bit more, perhaps poor Mewlie would be with us today.
As Mitzi says, the weight may not be a choice although, alas, the clothes are.
Talk about the figments falling apart and forgetting who posts as whom...
Umm, Team Hamou, you can stop blathering about my "father being harmed" by what I wrote. He DIED last March, and sockpuppet Mike, who posted that blather yesterday was the same sockpuppet that posted a "death notice" for my father on the "team Hamou" forum last March....
Soooo, Roberto. Advanced Paralegal Services is a fly-by-night outfit with a raft of lawsuits against them? Well, that would explain Hamou's association with them, her utter confusion about the differences between an appeal and a bill of review, and her recent masterful feat of accidentally suing herself.
For instance, Hamou posted last night that:
"they [DA's] do not dismiss charges if they truly believe a person is guilty of them, and that they have evidence to support that - any even half-way competent lawyer would know that."
Spoken like a true paralegal associated with a fraudulent company who manages to sue herself.
If DA's do not believe a crime was committed or that they cannot prove it, they don't bring charges in the first place. They certainly do not tie their staffs up with more than a dozen court appearances over fourteen months. They certainly do not go all the way to a preliminary hearing on a case they were going to dismiss as improperly prosecuted. They do not trouble themselves to get a ruling that the case was dismissed under PC 1385, which requires that the court first find probable cause to proceed.
What the DA did in this case was to put the interests of an elderly victim first in attempting to get her restitution and spare her the stress of a trial.
And it did not come easy. As the judge himself noted, the repeated continuances requested by the defense as Hamou / McConnell struggled to raise the money she scammed Mrs. Batchelor for sorely tried the patience of the court and finally forced Hamou / McConnell to pay up only when the last avenues of dodging and delay were exhausted.
I wonder if the woman with the "weight problem" was the one Oma bragged was helping her file that comically-flawed Bill of Review against herself.
"Birds of a feather, " Blake- "Birds of a feather,"
Oma Hamou aka Alexandra McConnell aka numerous other names is quite the character, and she has quite a circle of acquaintances.
Hamou / McConnell herself has multiple felony convictions, probation violations, numerous outstanding civil judgments against her, was recently arrested for felony forgery and forced to make restitution to an elderly victim, and currently has an outstanding warrant on her in Los Angeles County.
And we find that she recently had a roommate who was also a convicted felon, who was since arrested on a probation violation, and whose boyfriend was arrested in a motel room filled with computers and forgery equipment.
Then we find that she was accompanied to court last week by a woman driving a vehicle owned by Advanced Paralegal Services, a company that has been suspended by the State of California and that has at least nine legal cases filed against it, including for fraud, breach of contract, and legal malpractice.
Then we find that a principal with Advanced Paralegal Services, one Majid Tabibi, also has an interesting history with the courts of this country.
It is astonishing that one woman's circle of acquaintance would comprehend so many felons and con artists.
How, exactly, does she happen to meet all these people? Is she going to the wrong church? The wrong bars? Living in the wrong neighborhood? Chronically misjudging character?
Or are these work colleagues?
Quite right Blake:
from "snoopy" "your father looked inside of Oma's medical records at the hospital and revealed private information to you his son which is against the law to do so no matter if you are his son"
NO YOU BLITHERING MORON. The point was that there WERE NO MEDICAL RECORDS TO LOOK AT. Oma Hamou was NOT IN THE HOSPITAL WHEN SHE SAID SHE WAS. THERE WERE NO RECORDS OF HER BEING THERE. SHE WAS NOT LISTED AS A PATIENT ANYWHERE IN THE HOSPITAL ON THE DATES SHE CLAIMED.It was thus proven she LIED. Therfore, IDIOT: Nothing illegal.
Oh, goodness gracious me.
You mean Ms. Hamou / McConnell lied about something as serious as being in the hospital?
That's simply shocking. What sort of person would do such a thing?
Does that mean she was not admitted to the hospital with anxiety and heart problems the day she found out her court proceedings had been observed? Or all those times she claimed she could not send money she had promised or owed due to hospitalization? Or those court dates she missed due to illness?
And here I was worried sick that the poor thing was in the most precarious of health.
Shame, Ms. Hamou / McConnell. Shame.
That's quite right Ms P...
Oma Hamou owed Bob money. She had made repeated promises that the check was "in the mail" "being mailed" "being FedExed" etc etc, then promised for certain she would wire the money. Well, the day the money was supposed to be wired, Mark Anderson called to say Oma couldn't send the money because she was suddenly hospitalized and in Cedars Sinai Medical Center. Well, she screwed up with that one because my father was Chief of Surgery there at the time (which was before the HIPPA was enacted by the way), so I called him up, told him about all her previous "excuses" and asked if she really was a patient in Cedars as I had been told. He looked at the master patient list and called me back to say there were no records of her, at all. Period.
No crime, no stalking. Just proven that Oma Hamou was lying. Again.
I love the twisted and psychotic pseudo logic of "snoopy"...I was TOLD by someone AT OMA HAMOU"S DIRECTION that she was in the hospital (yeah, I answered the phone, not Bob, so Mark Anderson's bogus fake "affidavit" is worthless here). THUS Oma Hamou did not want her "being in the hospital" as "confidential" DUH. Moron. All I wanted to know from Dad was "yes or no" This woman said she was in Cedars as a patient. Is this true? The answer was NO. SHE LIED.
The real crime to "snoopy" is exposing Oma Hamou as the serial LIAR that she is.
Darling Oma, you seem to think that by jumping up and down and screaming at the top of your lungs you can divert people from the really interesting thing about the stay in Cedars. That would be the fact that it never happened, and you claimed it did. Now that's interesting.
Really, darling, you've been off your game for days now. Why? You can't keep the figments' personalities straight, you keep posting documents that make no sense or make you look even guiltier, darling.
Maybe your friend the Buddhist can help you with some yoga, and you can relax. Although she seems to be taking after Buddha in other than merely spiritual ways, if you know what I mean, and I think you do.
Still caring, darling, and wanting only the best for you!
Mitzi
Oma,
You say that no one on your forum has been screaming because to scream or yell you have to typein all capital letters. Look at the post above "Handmaiden's" post in which that character says this. It is written by the false me, "Snoopy". Pay particular attention to the SENTENCE IN ALL CAPITAL LETTERS THAT CLOSES THE POST.
I'm the one who told you that this was how someone "yelled" on the internet, remember?
Justin
Mitz,
Yes it is interesting that I proved Oma Hamou was lying about being in Cedars as her excuse for not sending Bob his money, it is more interesting that this same pattern of avoiding paying people is proven by Chris Malish's emails which I posted.
Also VERY interesting:
Oma Hamou aka Alexandra McConnell was overheard in Court telling people that she was "a certified paralegal" and introducing the woman with the huge "glandular problem" and bad hair as her "assistant". THEN they go off driving around in a black SUV belonging to a defunct PARALEGAL SERVICES company which was sued ten times in four years for fraud and breach of contract...THAT is interesting.
Oma owed Bob money back in 2000. The "cedars" excuse was in 2000, and that was when I asked for the confirmation.
The Privacy Rule took effect on April 14, 2003, with a one-year extension for certain "small plans". The HIPAA Privacy Rule regulates the use and disclosure of certain information held by "covered entities" (generally, health care clearinghouses, employer sponsored health plans, health insurers, and medical service providers that engage in certain transactions.)"Patient Privacy - The New Threats" Physicians Practice journal, volume 19, number 3, year 2009.
THREE YEARS AFTER THE FACT YOU MORON.
More important, thanks to 'snoopy' for confirming that the woman with the bad hair, worse white shoes, and huge glandular problem is "debbie" and I quote:"as the SUV driven by Debbie".
Poor thing, no wonder she is so bitter and bitchy all the time.
Yes of course I told people in 2004 what had happened in 2000, so what? Oma was supposed to be in Cedars in 2000, THE DAY AFTER I WAS TOLD SHE WAS THERE was the day I had Dad check the patient records, IN 2000. Yes FOUR YEARS LATER I told people about the incident. so what?
Prove otherwise idiot.
Are you soooo certain I wasn't in court in Victorville? Really so sure??? Prove I wasn't.
OK, I'll fess up, here is the photo I have of Oma with the rock necklace.
http://www.omahamoureport.org/OmaNecklace.jpg
Very easy to prove I could NOT have had Dad check anything about Oma Hamou in 2004, dimwit. He RETIRED on his 80th birthday in 2002, he was no longer on staff at Cedars in 2004.
Also VERY interesting:
Oma Hamou aka Alexandra McConnell was overheard in Court telling people that she was "a certified paralegal" and introducing the woman with the huge "glandular problem" and bad hair as her "assistant". THEN they go off driving around in a black SUV belonging to a defunct PARALEGAL SERVICES company which was sued ten times in four years for fraud and breach of contract...THAT is interesting.
Rob, for God's sake, will you tell Oma that her necklace is pretty? She seems to have bogged down on the necklace and your father's abilities to find out of she wasn't actually a patient at the hospital when she claimed she was to avoid a courtroom appearance.
I do enjoy the squawking about how this information is a violation of ethics. Would those be business ethics, sweetheart? The kind of business ethics that allowed you to bilk companies of services with no ability to pay for them if your "movie" was not made? Those kinds of ethics?
In fact, Oma, your presence in Cedars is something that can be verified one way or the other in about, oh, say, five seconds. Since you patently weren't there --- you never do anything you say you do, and your history of failing to appear for lawsuits works against you here --- it will be child's play to put you on the stand and get you to either (1) admit you have lied (always hard, but much easier to demonstrate in a court of law than on an internet posting board) or (2) commit perjury.
So enough about the the hospital. As for the necklace, tell her it's pretty, it seems to be what she wants. Rob never claimed to have been in Victorville, he asked how you knew he hadn't been? What difference does it make if he was? Or if I was? Or if the entire production crew of America's Most Wanted had staked out the damned courthouse? You're just obfuscating, sweetheart, to draw attention away from the questions Rob asked. One more time: Did you notify prospective service providers that their payments were contingent upon your "movie" being green lighted for production? Because if you didn't, girlfriend, what we had there was a Ponzi scheme.
RJ
Ok.
First, yes HIPPA was originally enacted in 1996. The salient part Ms deSayton is that the PRIVACY portion was not enacted until 2004. The 96 act only dealt with people being able to keep their health insurance when they switch jobs, called COBRA. Go so some legal research, since you drive a car belonging to Paralegal Research Services.
Speaking of legal research and Paralegal Research Services, the suspended corporation, you are incorrect again Ms de Sayton. The ONLY people associated are the three I mentioned. The principal being David Tabibi, clearly related to the other guy Majid Tabibi (the one on the board of People's Law School in LA, the unaccredited law school, but he isn't a member of the California Bar and was embroiled in a suit involving a couple of gas stations where he "forgot" to put the investor's name onto the deeds and licenses...)and Sima Falatoon who really odd is a realtor in Redondo Beach.
Here is the sordid civil suit record so you can see it yourself:
http://omahamoureport.org/AdvancedParalegalSuits.pdf
I never said I WAS in Court in Victorville. Learn to read. "snoopy" said that he knew for sure I was not and all I said was for snoopy to PROVE that statement. Period.
Third,
OK Oma, that necklace, the one with the green/gray rocks interspersed with little round black beads and the bigger green/gray rock as a sort of pendent, is VERY PRETTY. Happy now?
OK, now we can get back to RJ's most important point:
Since Oma Hamou and "friends" all admit the serious debts indicated by the numerous judgments against Oma Hamou were for her "film" project,
YES OR NO
Were the following advised PRIOR to providing goods and services that Oma Hamou, Enigma Films, Sarskaia Foundation could NOT pay for the goods and services contracted unless and until the film was funded, and did they understand and accept the risk KNOWING THIS when they provided the goods and services?
NTT-Verio? Yes or NO?
American Express? Yes or NO??
Global Insight? Yes or NO??
Variety/Daily Variety? Yes or NO?
Freeman, Freeman & Smiley? Yes or NO?
Boardrush, Yes or NO?
Westar Legal Services. Yes or NO?
Bob Atchison.Yes or NO?
Not specifically a Ponzi scheme RJ, but the use of false pretenses to obtain goods and services is called FRAUD.
See California Civil Code:
"Actual fraud consists of any of the following acts, committed by or with the connivance of a party to a contract with intent to deceive another party to the contract, or to induce the other party to enter into the contract [Civ. Code §1572]:
1. the suggestion, as a fact, of that which is not true, by one who does not believe it to be true;
2. the positive assertion, in any manner not warranted by the information of the person making it, of that which is not true, though the person making the assertion believes it to be true;
3. the suppression of that which is true, by one having knowledge or belief of the fact;
4. a promise made without any intention of performing it; and
5. any other act fitted to deceive."
Oh,
RJ, one correction, I just noticed. Oma said she was in Cedars as an excuse why she did not wire Bob his money on the day she absolutely swore and promised she would.
Not to avoid any court appearance, at least at THAT time....
I apologize to Oma for misrepresenting the reason she claimed to be in Cedars. I do have a question, though, forgive my ignorance. I have read that she headed a company, not a one-woman show, and yet it seems that if she didn't take care of every single errand --- in this case mailing a check --- it didn't get done. Justin, what exactly did you do for her back in the day?
Where were the other employees? Was no one available to run down to the post office?
I mean, Irving Thalberg died and MGM managed to keep going.
Again, I am sorry. Oma did not claim to be in Cedars to avoid a court appearance (I get that confused with the trial in Texas, what happened that time? Pneumonia?). She claimed to be in Cedars to avoid settling a debt.
Thanks for the correction, Rob.
Also, the broad outline of what she was running with the "movie" was a Ponzi scheme, although perhaps it differed in some of the details. So can we agree to say "close, but no cigar"?
Rebecca
Well RJ,
Let's just put it this way, Fraud is Fraud, regardless of the name.
Black or ebony, beige or taupe, tomayto or tomahto, Ponzi or Confidence game...
A rose by any other name would still smell as sweet...
oh, well maybe "a dead fish in the hot sun by any other name would still stink to high heaven" is more appropriate.
Oh,
and RJ, quite right about the "employees". I'm rather certain that those employees were the same people exactly as her recent friends who were also seemingly unable to get Oma's key to the Batchelor rental property and go in to rescue the cats and prevent the subsequent damage from the dozens of unattended cats left inside without water, food or clean litter boxes for days ...
Oh, dear me...
Ms. P, I'm so sorry, I forgot. Mewlie and all.
Too soon??
Oh, Mr. Moshein. How kind of you to think of me.
I have to say that things are not going well right now between Mr. A. and myself. I know he did not mean to blow Mewlie up when he tried to give her mouth-to-mouth resuscitation, and I've tried my best not to blame him.
But I just can't let it go, my dear. That horrid cracking sound just before her chest expanded to the size of a canteloupe just stays with me morning, noon, and night. And in my heart of hearts, I knew something like this would happen if Mr. A. didn't lay off the ham and pastrami. I tried to tell him without hurting his feelings, but sometimes you just have to say it directly to be truly kind.
I've tried to drown my despair in a vertiable mountain of watercress and beautifully trimmed bread, but nothing seems to work. If there is a mayonnaise spice yet to be tried, then I'm certain I don't know what it is. I do fear that if I can't pull out of this abyss of grief that Mr. A. and I might not make it.
Losing him would be almost as bad as losing Mewlie. Just how much grief can a lady be expected to take? If something were to happen to Felineus, I know I would simply go over the edge. Felix L., clean though he seems determined to keep himself, really isn't much company.
Oh dear, oh dear.
Penelope,
have you tried minced anchovies, lemon juice, cayenne pepper and a touch of garlic and hint of dijon mustard with the mayo? It's my riff on Cesar Salad dressing, wonderful spread for sandwiches....
Hugs.
Since Oma Hamou and "friends" all admit the serious debts indicated by the numerous judgments against Oma Hamou were for her "film" project,
We ask Oma Hamou/"Team Hamou" that speaks for her with her blessing:
YES OR NO
Were the following advised PRIOR to providing goods and services that Oma Hamou, Enigma Films, Sarskaia Foundation could NOT pay for the goods and services contracted unless and until the film was funded, and did they understand and accept the risk KNOWING THIS when they provided the goods and services?
NTT-Verio? Yes or NO?
American Express? Yes or NO??
Global Insight? Yes or NO??
Variety/Daily Variety? Yes or NO?
Freeman, Freeman & Smiley? Yes or NO?
Boardrush, Yes or NO?
Westar Legal Services. Yes or NO?
Bob Atchison.Yes or NO?
poor stupid moronic "mike" the boring, bombastic idiot sockpuppet...
Oma non suited her lawsuit and never re filed. So anything from that dismissed suit is MEANINGLESS or are you too stupid to understand that . Oh Wait.. YOU are, you are a grifter con artist just like she is....Her claims are years old and years out of statute of limitations. Should your made up friend believe she has real claims, she is free to come to Texas and sue me....please.
Remember, "Mike", in regard to Oma . . . the court said that she owes Bob Atchison, Amex and many others money, and to PAY UP.
So,
Light bulbs started coming on. I remembered that last year, Tina kept telling me about this "older Arab guy" who gave "Alexandra McConnell" a lot of money. She told him it was for "cancer treatment". She, according to Tina, used it for her liposuction. There was something about a car too, but I don't recall the details. Anyhoo, Tina told me the "Arab guy's" wife found out about the money given to "Alexandra", she got really mad and it all hit the fan.
So, guess what I found about David Tabibi? His wife DIVORCED HIM last year. Was David Tabibi the "arab guy" who gave her a lot of money for her "cancer"? Could it be that Oma got a black SUV from him as well, and never bothered to change the registration? We know she has a history of driving without registration and insurance...Would explain everything easily.
This all seems to fall neatly into place.
Since Oma Hamou and "friends" all admit the serious debts indicated by the numerous judgments against Oma Hamou were for her "film" project,
We ask Oma Hamou/"Team Hamou" that speaks for her with her blessing:
YES OR NO
Were the following advised PRIOR to providing goods and services that Oma Hamou, Enigma Films, Sarskaia Foundation could NOT pay for the goods and services contracted unless and until the film was funded, and did they understand and accept the risk KNOWING THIS when they provided the goods and services?
NTT-Verio? Yes or NO?
American Express? Yes or NO??
Global Insight? Yes or NO??
Variety/Daily Variety? Yes or NO?
Freeman, Freeman & Smiley? Yes or NO?
Boardrush, Yes or NO?
Westar Legal Services. Yes or NO?
Bob Atchison.Yes or NO
Robbele,
There's an easy way to find out. Find the former Mrs. Tabibi and ask her, darling.
You're like Sherlock Holmes!
Shalom!
Mitzi
Darling "Mike",
Remember, the courts said that Oma Hamouy owed Bob Atchison payment when she lost the suit. When can he expect a check, darling?
I ask because I care, darling.
Mitzi
Oh give it UP already "team hamou". You show you prefer to twist words to suit your agendae (and I mean the plural) rather than comprehend the reality.
Under Texas Law "a TRO should only issue if the applicant is found to have the RIGHT to ask for the relief" nothing more. The verbiage you scream in extra huge type is right out of the Dorsaneo Form Book. It's nothing the Judge "found" it is the verbiage for every TRO and only means that the applicant has probable cause to ASK for the relief, not that the applicant will probably "win" at trial.
Now, as for being "above the law" Oma Hamou has a valid unchallenged legal judgment, issued by that SAME court which she insists regardless of any circumstance she REFUSES TO EVER PAY. Now, who exactly is above the law??
When can Bob expect that CASHIERS check Oma? He knows better than to ever take a personal check from you.
and yes "Mike" whatever you really are, it is my personal opinion that you are part of a big con game. Just my opinion of course.
Perhaps she has relied upon counsel of advanced paralegals. And Mitzi is right, the easiest thing to do would be to find the ex-Mrs. Tabibi and ask her what happened. Or the legal records of the divorce, whichever is easier.
If anyone really cared, that is.
RJ
Here is the law in the State of Texas. Period. One can not change the meaning of these words to suit themselves:
If a party negligently permits a judgment to become final by neglecting to file a motion for new trial or appeal, then he is precluded from proceeding on a petition for bill of review. French v. Brown, 424 S.W.2d
893, 895 (Tex. 1967).
What part of "precluded from proceeding on a petition for bill of review" is not clear?
OH, wait, you don't understand the words, do you.
Legal Dictionary
Main Entry: pre·clude
Pronunciation: pri-'klüd
Function: transitive verb
Inflected Forms: pre·clud·ed; pre·clud·ing
: to prevent or exclude by necessary consequence
: to prevent (a party) from litigating an action or claim
: to prevent (a claim or action) from being litigated
Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of Law, © 1996 Merriam-Webster, Inc.
So allow me to translate into simple English for those who's vocabulary seems to be impaired:
If Oma Hamou screwed up and thus negligently permits her judgment to become final by not bothering to file a motion for new trial or appeal, then she is PREVENTED UNDER LAW from proceeding on a petition for bill of review. French v. Brown, 424 S.W.2d
893, 895 (Tex. 1967).
Hope this clears that up for y'all...
Now, back to the points that seem never to be addressed:
Since Oma Hamou and "friends" all admit the serious debts indicated by the numerous judgments against Oma Hamou were for her "film" project,
We ask Oma Hamou/"Team Hamou" that speaks for her with her blessing:
YES OR NO
Were the following advised PRIOR to providing goods and services that Oma Hamou, Enigma Films, Sarskaia Foundation could NOT pay for the goods and services contracted unless and until the film was funded, and did they understand and accept the risk KNOWING THIS when they provided the goods and services?
NTT-Verio? Yes or NO?
American Express? Yes or NO??
Global Insight? Yes or NO??
Variety/Daily Variety? Yes or NO?
Freeman, Freeman & Smiley? Yes or NO?
Boardrush, Yes or NO?
Westar Legal Services. Yes or NO?
Bob Atchison.Yes or NO
This will mark the 418th consecutive week without any law enforcement contact with me or Bob since Oma Hamou/Alexandra McConnell started threatening it.
I know that this is a niggling criticism, but Oma is really having a poor spelling day. "Snoopy" "handmaiden" and "Mike" are posting chock-a-blockl with errors that are not typos, but poor spelling. And oddly enough they are getting the same words wrong.
How can this be?
One of your figments needs to show Oma Hamou (I know, I can't believe I am typing this with a straight face) the standard language used in a temporary restraining order. You splash this around as though it was still meaningful years after Oma non-suited; it isn't. You talk about it as though it was an uncommon event; it wasn't. You seem to have no legal knowledge whatsoever, which I suppose is what happens when you don't pay your legal bills. For example, you do realize that your girlish threats to put Rob Moshein and Bob Athison under criminal litigation has left you liable for a libel suit? And Oma, your name is on the blog, dear. You had better be able to prove that the figments aren't you, girlfriend.
And of course you can't.
Rebecca
Darling "Handmaiden",
Has there been a single case won by Oma Hamou during her entire legal history, darling? Because before you start tossing insults at real estate lawyers (I'm sensitive, Bitsy's boy Walter is a real estate lawyer and he does quite well for himself, thank G-d), darling, you may want to hire one. He'd be bound to do better than "her" past legal teams, no?
Love you, darling. Mean it.
Mitzi Kedem
Let's see.
If a case of "cancer" gets you lipo, what gets you an SUV?
Maybe try lumbago next? That ought to be worth at least a rent check ... and may get you out of whatever it took to get the truck.
If you know what I mean. And I think you do.
Okay Blake, I am taking issue here. Have you had cancer to where you can make fun of it this way? I have had cancer. My mother had cancer, my brother had cancer and my father died of it. It's not funny. In any way shape or form.
Russophile,
Blake is NOT making fun of cancer. MY sister is currently undergoing radiation, after finishing chemo for breast cancer a second time. My mother had cancer and my grandmother DIED of cancer.
Blake is pointing out how disgusting the story is about YOUR BFF Oma Hamou who told a guy she had cancer, when she didn't, and she used the money he gave her for "cancer treatments" for Liposuction on her hips and butt.
I think Blake's point was that she didn't have cancer, BFF, hence his use of the "" around the word. And if there is anything less funny than cancer, it surely is pretending you have it to get things from people. If that is what happened. Given everything else Tina said that turned out to be accurate, I'd at least consider it a possibility.
And in case you were wondering, I've never had it, no.
RJ
We're talking about Oma Hamou here. A woman who claimed she had been raped by someone muttering about Bob Atchison and internet blogs. A woman who claimed a friend was having an abortion as a reason for not paying money she promised. A woman who claimed heart trouble when she found out her cover story about her recent court appearances was unraveling. A woman who has used car accidents, head injuries, and admission to Cedars Sinai as fake excuses to avoid her debts.
Rape. Abortion. Heart disease. Head injuries. Cancer. This woman uses the horrific events that actually enmesh people in real suffering as cynical stage props for her shameless scams.
No, I'm not making fun of cancer, Russophile. I'm ridiculing one sorry excuse for a human being.
Blake, you forgot a few more "stage props" of genuine suffering Oma Hamou has mis appropriated to use as part of her attempts at deception:
Abusive father
Abusive husband
Raped by husband at gunpoint
Raped by strangers claiming they were "justified" by stuff they read on the internet
Stillbirth of her rape baby
Abortion of a two headed rape baby (a different woman than above)
Murdered pets
Assaulted by strangers muttering about things they read on the internet.
Blood on her porch
Near CONSTANT hospitalization (at least three times a year)
Constant illnesses, (average of six times per year)
Arrest and Felony charges "caused" by things someone read on the internet.
Seriously Russophile, do you REALLY accept these clearly fabricated stories as true?? Does ANYONE? Just look at the list of above things Oma Hamou and/or her "friends" have publicly discussed as "true"....This list is beyond the realm of reality or even believability. Seriously.....
Riddle me this Batman:
Since Ms deSayton with the glandular problem insists that nobody should believe the word of a convicted felon ie: Tina Vanveen, then WHY should we take the word of the convicted felon Oma Hamou???
She further insists no one has the "right to know" Oma Hamou's medical conditions or that I have any "Evidence" about it, then just WHY do her friends post on the ASK OMA FORUM about it all the time? viz:
Snoopy on Wed May 27, 2009 10:43 am "O.k. my friend had pneumonia and had been dproperly discharged from the hospital down in Austin, besides that she was on medication a fact that is properly noted on record. Oma got pneumonia at trial in 2005 was sick this is a well documented fact
This is a good one:
by handmaiden on Tue Dec 29, 2009 2:52 pm
He doesn't believe that these very real medical conditions are anything but a sham.
by Snoopy on Mon Dec 28, 2009 6:09 pm
Can you prove she did not go to the hospital for an anxiety attack, no. When this gets to court with Pallasart and Bob Atchison she can prove she did go.
by Snoopy on Mon Dec 28, 2009 3:57 pm
The hospital says it is an acute anxiety attack
by Snoopy
on Mon Dec 28, 2009 12:37 pm
My friend is at the emergency room at a hospital for an acute anxiety attack. I bet you when this gets to court you can't prove she wasn't at the hospital, nope, but she can.
by Take a Hike on Sun Dec 20, 2009 1:28 pm
Justin you wrote Oma was in the hospital the other night, for what? Is she o.k.? Let her know I said hello
Postby Snoopy on Sun Dec 20, 2009 1:37pm
Oma attempted to break up a dog fight in the process of doing this her hand got hurt and required a couple of stitches. Ouch!
by Snoopy on Fri Dec 18, 2009 8:37 pm
I spoke with Oma prior to her having to go to the hospital tonight
by Snoopy on Thu Apr 30, 2009 11:06 am
Oma is out of surgery and not doing so well in recovery, remember her in your prayers.
by Mike on Wed Apr 22, 2009 9:33 pm
This time she was really hurt bad, (she is under bed rest by Doctor's orders even now because of what happened to her this last time because of Bob's story about her,
As to her responding here, do not expect it for a while, as I mentioned she is under strict bed rest by Doctor's orders and may have to transfer to a hospital very soon, if things do not change.
and even the person herself:
by Oma Hamou on Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:46 pm
I am sick and spent Sunday at the hospital.
So, by their own statements this is what, FOUR different hospital visits in less than 18 months
Hamoo decided long ago to recreate (and highly edit) her life on the internet. She has posted about her marriage to a supposed child-abusing pistol-whipper, her fake charity work, her still-born film project, her claimed career as an actress and model, her supposed illnesses and injuries, her alleged rape, her and her friend's purported abortions, her blondeness causing her to make poor life choices. Hell, she's even posted years-old soft-core porn shots of herself in various states of undress and even in full nudity.
Yet any time anyone dares to challenge her outlandish claims by asking questions or making fun of them, we get a stern lecture that she is a private person whose health and other concerns are confidential matters into which no one has the right to inquire.
Bimbo, if you don't want to have your bizarre life and your absurd claims questioned, then keep them off the internet.
Post a Comment