As law enforcement seems unable to assist me, and the person behind this campaign to defame me and interfere with my business and profession, named variously Oma Hamou, Oma Mcconnell or Alexandra McConnell is what they call "judgment proof" meaning she has no money, I must place this blog here. She recently filed Bankruptcy, swearing under oath that her only income is $2500 a month from her friend Jim Sproul's company "Reseda Screen & Glass", that she lives in rental houses in the Antelope Valley and in July she was evicted for non payment of rent from a house in Palmdale, and she has over $500,000 in outstanding debts.
I would NOT even have written here, had this person not continually written her own false and defamatory statements herself and aided and abetted other personae writing "on her behalf" for the last three years. If she doesn't want me to say anything about her, she ought not have been continually blogging and writing about me much less aiding and encouraging others to do so as well.
The woman behind all of this goes by many names: Oma Hamou, Oma McConnell, Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Hamou, Oma Demian, Alexandra Murphy, are the usual ones, but there are others. The reason this woman and her "alleged" friends crusade to destroy me is simple. I learned about her genuine background, and she wants me silenced from speaking about it.
This woman admits that her actions are all motivated by her bitterness and hatred towards me, and this is the reason for her actions.
This woman, Oma Hamou, Oma McConnell, Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Hamou, Oma Demian, Alexandra Murphy and her other aliases have a twenty year track record of FELONY CONVICTIONS, multiple arrests, failure to abide by the requirements of her probation for her felony convictions which lead to more arrests, many many civil judgments against her for hundreds of thousands of dollars, a history of writing bad checks, and currently she was arrested late in 2008 in San Bernardino California on a Felony Charge of Forgery of a Financial Instrument (she seems to have forged a large check) After 14 months of dragging the process out, she paid the Victim full restitution and the District Attorney dropped the Felony charge. She has a history of evictions and bad checks.
This woman also has a recent default Judgment against her in Los Angeles County, in the amount of $55,000:
Case Number: MC020860 HAMID REFAI VS ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL, JIM SPROUL, ET AL
Filing Date: 09/23/2009
According to the case, Mr. Refai, a married man, was "involved" with Alexandra McConnell, she kept telling him about serious "medical problems" and asking for "loans" for medical bills in the total amount of $51,000. This was confirmed by the fact that a woman who used to live in her house wrote on the internet THREE MONTHS before the suit was filed: "I lived with this lady, she is no good. SHE LIES. SHE HAS LIKE 50 CATS LIVING WITH HER AND HER HOUSE SMELLS LIKE SHIT AND CAT SPRAY AND PISS. She is dirty, filthy and uses old men for money I SEEN IT MYSELF. By the way Hamid's wife knows it was LIPOSUCTION you drained their bank account for, not cancer in your asshole. He had her sign a promissory note, co signed by long time co-conspirator Jim Sproul. She of course never PAID back the money. She, of course, never showed up in Court.
Here is the Final Judgment against Alexandra McConnell aka Oma Hamou and her "longtime friend" Jim Sproul:
This woman has been EVICTED TWICE IN THE LAST TWO YEARS FOR FAILURE TO PAY RENT AND GIVING THE LANDLORD BACK CHECKS.
Someone else has recently posted a precis of the criminal and debt history of this woman. You can go here to read the specific details for yourself:
http://www.omahamoureality.blogspot.com
I have put up a precis of the specific information for her victims and law enforcement here: http://OmaHamouVictims.blogspot.com
You are encouraged to share information you may have about her and her activities with me.
While Oma Hamou aka Alexandra McConnell claims to be a "Motion Picture Executive" her online anonymous "friends" admit she works as a Paralegal in the Palmdale area. She has no background experience as a "Producer".
She is nearly psychotic in her daily compulsion because I stumbled onto these actual facts of her past, and present, which do not coincide with the personae she wants to project to others.
This woman, Oma Hamou, Oma McConnell, Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Hamou, Oma Demian, Alexandra Murphy et al, has for YEARS now, threatened me with civil and criminal actions. For years now, NOTHING has happened except more ongoing threats online. NOW HER OWN WEBSITE ON FEBRUARY 28, 2010 CONFIRMS AND ADMITS SHE AND HER "FRIENDS" DELIBERATELY LIED EVERY SINGLE TIME THEY SAID OMA HAMOU HAD FILED A CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST ME AND THEY WERE LYING EVERY SINGLE TIME THEY SAID I WAS UNDER POLICE INVESTIGATION, SINCE THE POLICE WILL INVESTIGATE NOTHING UNLESS A FORMAL COMPLAINT IS FILED. HER ONLINE ALLEGED 'FRIENDS' NOW CLAIM THEY HAVE LIED FOR YEARS ABOUT THEIR IDENTITIES.
I am called a "criminal stalker". First, being called a criminal is Libel per se in Texas, since I have never been convicted of ANYTHING worse than one speeding ticket. As for a stalker, well, I have no clue where this woman is, where she lives, and frankly I don't WANT to know, nor can I care less. In the words of one of her attorney's, Dave. S. "the faster that woman is in my rearview mirror the happier I'll be" (yeah I have the email he said that to me in.). I WISH NO CONTACT WITH OR FROM THIS PERSON.
I do NOT wish this person ill, or harm. Frankly, I do not care about her. The less I hear about her, the better. That said, no one should ever be subjected to harm or danger. I DO NOT WISH THIS PERSON HARM, nor have I advocated, wished, nor advised anyone to harm her. Such allegations are baseless, wrong and defamatory. I just want he to leave me and my partner ALONE and stop the thousands of pages of defamatory lies she puts up and allows "friends" to post on her website in order to cause me harm.
This woman, Oma Hamou, Oma McConnell, Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Hamou, Oma Demian, Alexandra Murphy has demonstrated she has no credibility. You can read in previous posts where she has outright lied, most notably when she filed a report about her business with Dunn and Bradstreet that was investigated by them and shown to be completely fraudulent.
Ask yourself if the following make any, rational or reasonable common sense:
This woman claims to be an actress and model, but for a decade steadfastly REFUSES to provide one single shred of evidence to support the allegation, not even a credit, reference or magazine issue. She says only "I was and I don't have to prove it. YOU have to prove I wasn't". Does that make sense?
This woman claims that her three felony convictions were not Her fault, but rather someone else's fault. Does THAT make sense?
This woman claims that her recent Felony Forgery Charges in San Bernardino are "just a big mistake" and "law enforcement and the DA" are on "her side" and "believe her", yet they STILL pressed charges and scheduling dozens of hearings over FOURTEEN MONTHS. Does THAT make sense??
This woman has claimed for six years non stop that I am being investigated by law enforcement and the FBI. Yet, NOTHING ever happened, I have never been contacted by law enforcement for any reason in those six years other than one speeding ticket. Does it make any sense to you that law enforcement is doing ANYTHING for six years now?
Buddha said Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense.
Look at all the blathering posts she has put up on the internet, and ask yourself, do these things agree with YOUR reason and your own common sense? The answer is obvious.
As you can see, this woman and/or her cronies now LIE, falsify documents and use years old private letters to attempt to defame and disparage me, and Bob Atchison
Many people whom have come into contact with her call her a con artist and scam artist. She hangs out with convicted felons, even inviting these career criminals to live in her house with her.
You can verify all the arrests, judgments, evictions, etc for yourself with simple online searches.
You are free to email me with your questions, Rob@AustinWineGuy.com, and if you yourself have been a VICTIM of this woman Oma Hamou, Oma McConnell, Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Hamou, Oma Demian, Alexandra Murphy, I encourage you to contact me.
217 comments:
1 – 200 of 217 Newer› Newest»Fresh clean new blog. Carry on!
We now enter the 465th consecutive week without any law enforcement contact, with me or Bob since Oma Hamou/Alexandra McConnell started threatening it.
This is the 234th consecutive week since Oma Hamou wrote to a Texas District Court Judge that she had in fact "sworn out complaints with the FBI and Attorney General's office" against me and Bob, with NOTHING HAPPENING.
NOTHING ever manages to happen... she says she HAS filed these complaints, but...Nothing. Go figure. At least they ADMIT THEY LIE ABOUT ANY CRIMINAL CHARGES BEING FILED AGAINST ME PERSONALLY FOR THESE FIVE YEARS!
As well as consecutive Week 270 for nothing happening in the most recent round of threat of lawsuits against us, since Bob won his suit against Oma Hamou.
TWO HUNDRED SEVENTY WEEKS, over 1,890 days, 67 months, over five and a half full years! 460 separate claims of "impending" "immediate" "we promise its happening" legal litigation, but nothing ever happens. Ask yourself what shred of credibility can anyone have who makes the same statement almost daily for OVER FIVE FULL YEARS, but never actually does anything.
And, NOTHING happening now for OVER ONE WHOLE YEAR on the fictional "Bill of Review"...Which is now about to be dismissed for lack of prosecution (DWOP) according to Court guidelines under Local Rules.
We are also now past week 34 of the "TRO" being requested"tomorrow" or "by the end of the week..." "the lawyers are working on it"...Wasn't FAT debbie the one who "PROMISED" to post it the moment it was issued?? And a full EIGHTEEN WEEKS now since "snoopy" said CLEARLY "is why a California Judge granted a restraining order against the Nut." It has a very short time in which it must be served, and only 15 days to be HEARD...(California Code of Civil Procedure Section 527.6(c)
So far, it hasn't appeared...Nothing has, except of course learning the Oma Hamou was EVICTED for not paying rent in Palmdale this summer, and that she wrote a BAD CHECK to the Court for filing fees...
More threats, more veiled hints...MORE "complaints filed with the FBI" who still haven't come pounding on my door, much less have not even read my blog yet...,AFTER TWELVE WHOLE WEEKS NOW. THREE WHOLE MONTHS. NADA
same stuff for OVER FIVE YEARS and NOTHING EVER HAPPENS..
Have a great week guys. I know I will.
STILL waiting for ONE SHRED OF PROOF that Oma Hamou filed anything on the Bill of Review....
Anyone else notice the word "letter" after "Forensic Document Examiner" doesn't line up properly nor quite match the font??
Talk about FRAUDULENT MADE UP DOCUMENTS...Oma Oma Oma, didn't Tina's boyfriend teach you ANYTHING about faking documents??
Dear Rob,
She is doing a bait and switch again, to avoid discussing the fact that she has been caught impersonating "Justin Edwards" of the AFI; she used his picture on that other site, and I will bet you dollars to donuts the poor guy has no idea that she has been impersonating him all these years.
Oma Hamou is stealing yet another identity. This is in addition to the names she absconded with to open American Express cards, to the variety of aliases she has used during her career as a professional criminal, and to the routine way in which she changes her name to suit the circumstances in which she finds herself (cf. renting the Cowan house).
Dear me, Oma, what will you do when Professor Edwards confirms that his son could not possibly be involved in your ridiculous con artistry?
RJ
Sigh. I suppose this also means that the poor imaginary Russian adopted child joins Breadsticks and the bisexual retarded anime fan in Never-Never Land.
Oma plays bait and switch on a lot of things...
She won't prove she filed a Motion to continue.
She won't actually DENY that she isn't stealing the real Justin Edwards' identity.
She won't acknowledge that DWOP means it IS dismissed until the Court decides otherwise.
She won't explain the screw up where she said she was IN Austin then an hour later said she wasn't...
I could go on, but I won't bore you with repeating the same thing over and over, unlike Oma of course.
Rob, there's a good bit more wrong with that piece of "evidence" from the "expert" than just the font.
For one thing, the letter labels the documents he supposedly examined for Hamou as exhibits "K1" and "Q1". However, these designations do not correspond to any evidentiary list referenced in the pleading.
Also, this "expert" goes beyond giving his opinion that the document he examined is different from the original document. He goes on to say "the owner of PallasArt Web Ventures committed fraud on the court ...."
That is a question of law which no "professional expert" would venture to make in a submission to a court. He might opine on a question of whether one document appears consistent with another, but he would not intrude on the judge's province of determining the question of law regarding whether the court was thereby defrauded.
For instance, the "expert" is not claiming to compare two different versions of the same invoice. He is claiming to compare a PallasArt invoice from another billing to an invoice relating to the Hamou case.
Even if his observations were accurate about differences, there is no proof that PallasArt might not have invoices on hand from different printers or not have printed different invoices for different billings from different computers.
This is the reason no real expert would venture beyond the elements of the physical comparison into making a comprehensive conclusion on a matter of law.
By overreaching in fabricating this "evidence" to attempt to convince people of what she needs them to believe, Hamou reveals the whole exercise as the ploy it is.
Hamou has a history of presenting altered or faked evidence to a court.
She did so in the Cowan case by presenting that judge with an altered copy of a cancelled check.
She did so in filing a sworn bankruptcy petition that contained demonstrable inaccuracies in failing to disclose known income and other items.
Since she will never show her face in a court in Texas again, of course, she probably sees no real risk in filing yet another faked document with a court there.
The real utility to her of this ruse is to post it on the internet, with all the usual promises that it is going to sink Atchison in court, or with the FBI, or in "future litigation", or in the eyes of his mother, or whatever.
There will, of course, be none of these things.
All we have is a cornered skunk spraying its stink in an effort to fend off a threat.
465consecutive weeks without any law enforcement contact, with me or Bob since Oma Hamou/Alexandra McConnell started threatening it.
FOUR HUNDRED SIXTY FIVE WEEKS. Almost NINE YEARS!
TWO HUNDRED SEVENTY WEEKS, over 1,890 days, 67 months, over five and a half full years! 460 separate claims of "impending" "immediate" "we promise its happening" legal litigation, but nothing ever happens
234 weeks now since Oma Hamou wrote to a Texas District Court Judge that she had in fact "sworn out complaints with the FBI and Attorney General's office" against me and Bob
34 WEEKS AGO A "TRO" was being requested"tomorrow" or "by the end of the week..." "the lawyers are working on it" we were told."
TWELVE WEEKS AGO OMA HAMOU SAID SHE FILED A COMPLAINT WITH THE FBI
What has come from all of these promises, threats, assertions, statements claiming to be factual?
N O T H I N G
There is NO credibility whatsoever from anyone who has participated in the making of any of these statements over the years. None at all. Why? simple.
NOTHING EVER HAPPENS. EVER.
Except of course, Oma Hamou aka Alexandra McConnell got arrested, faced felony charges, evicted twice, and ran up more debt.
THAT ALL HAPPENED.
Only the sociopathic or psychotic delusional could make such statements as Oma Hamou, much less believe them.
She's doing it again, gentlemen. Oma Hamou has demonstrably stolen Justin Edwards' identity, and she is now backpedaling all over the map to try and dodge owning up to the fact. She now claims that Justin Edwards is not "Snoopy's" name, which sort of begs the question as to why she lifted his name and face on that other forum. I submit that this is part of her pattern, i.e. identity theft.
She is also making wild-eyed accusations about attempts to "murder" "Debbie" or "Justin Edwards" if their real names were revealed. Chica, calm your ass down. In the first place --- really the only place --- there is no "Justin" or "Debbie". There is only you and my BFF. In the second place, you have failed to produce any credible evidence of attempted "harm". And by that I mean physical harm. Would several people like to see you in jail? You betcha! Would it be a bad idea to run into, say. Mr. Refai? Probably, girlfriend. You grifted 50K from the man. I should think he would at least give you a stern talking-to. Since Bob has made no move to harm you during the several years since he won his court case, there are a couple of conclusions one might derive: (1) you actually don't matter to him in the slightest, other than a somewhat pesky background noise. I mean, he hardly ever posts here. (2) you are so consumed with self-importance that it gives you a secret thrill to live a life of dramatic excess or (3) you're nuts. I lean toward a combination of (2) and (3).
In any event, she has used Justin Edwards' name to defame Bob Atchison and Rob Moshein. I assume that you have chapter and verse from the other website, Robert? I look forward to hearing the reaction of Mr. Edwards when he discovers that someone has left him open to a libel suit. Good times, Oma!
Rebecca
Sorry Oma,
We won't buy the new bait and switch that I "had no right" to have Oma Hamou's bankruptcy petition.
The system for Federal Court is called "PACER" for PUBLIC ACCESS TO ELECTRONIC COURT RECORDS".
EVERY person in the country has the right and reason to access and possess Federal Court PUBLIC records. That is the MEANING OF PUBLIC RECORDS.
Besides BOB was a named creditor and HE has EVERY REASON to have the document.
Now, why don't you answer the pressing issue of stealing Justin Edwards' identity and using it to commit the FEDERAL TORT CRIME of Libel, Defamation and SLANDER on the Internet.
Handmaiden-who-is-Oma posted:
"A person has the right, by law, to amend petitions and pleadings."
So, will the amended bankruptcy petition show as income the $50,000 obtained from Hamid Refai?
Before you rush to denial, remember that Refai's attorney has copies of the canceled checks.
(Hmmm. This puts me in mind of Al Capone. After years of ducking the police, it was finally tax evasion that brought him down, you know.)
And, yes, Rebecca. You are right that the real Justin Edwards probably does not post on the "Ask Oma" forum, even though posts there said he did.
But I am going to contact the Edwards family, anyway. The fact that Justin Edwards works in film out of L.A. and has an association with Austin indicates that it was not just a coincidence that Hamou expropriated his identity for her purposes. There has likely been some form of contact between them in the past.
(Who knows? Perhaps he'll be the very first person we talk to who knows her and has something good to say about her.)
And, of course, Michele Biernat of Benefit Design Group in Portland said she has talked to him and has assured us he is the real poster. Either that will turn out to be true, or it will become clear she is working with Oma Hamou in expropriating Mr. Edwards' identity.
It will be useful to fill in another piece of the puzzle as to how Hamou steals the identity of others.
Dear Oma who is "Handmaiden",
Dear, you're hilarious. You stole Justin Edwards' identity. You used his picture as your avatar on another website in a deliberate attempt to make people think that the "Snoopy" character was that man, with his personal history. That's a fact, sister friend.
It will not be physically harmful to go to jail. It will simply curtail your ability to function as a professional criminal. You'll probably be in a minimum security women's facility. It's not like you're going to be remanded to Devil's Island. Perhaps you can teach courses in Russian history in the joint. Or film-making class. Martha Stewart showed them all how to do Christmas crafts. I know her, by the way (my family home was relatively near Turkey Hill). She didn't mind it so much.
RJ
Only one problem RJ.
Martha Stewart has EXTENSIVE experience and knowledge of Christmas crafts.
Oma Hamou has no Russian History expertise and even LESS Movie Making skills, unless of course one considers "The Producers" scam to make money from failure "motion picture production experience".
At least Mel Brooks was funny. Oma is hilarious, but not intentionally.
Credibility of Oma Hamou???:
Saturday, July 08, 2006
"The police feel Oma is a victim and has and continues to be victimized by Bob Atchison and his company (Pallasart) and its associates. They have encouraged her daily that what she is doing in filing her criminal complaints and civil lawsuit is the right thing to do""Oma has changed her mind under the repeated assaults that she has endured and now wants Bob to go to jail and from what I’ve heard there is a strong chance that this may happen. Oma wants the courts to overturn the judgment against her in Bob’s favor."
and here we are, FOUR YEARS AND FOUR MONTHS LATER, and what did Oma Hamou do??
N O T H I N G
WHAT DID LAW ENFORCEMENT DO?
N O T H I N G
The CREDIBILITY of "team Hamou"???
Tuesday, August 29, 2006
"Mike Newson" posted:
Remember everything, absolutely everything, that either Justin or myself have published on this forum we have seen the documentation supporting our words or that it is our personal experience, as we know that this is going to go to court --- as that is what Oma Hamou is devoted to right now.
Here we are FOUR YEARS AND THREE MONTHS LATER:
What Did Oma Hamou/Alexandra McConnell do?
N O T H I N G
The CREDIBILITY OF OMA HAMOU:
Tuesday, August 29, 2006
"Mike Newson" posted:
I can tell you this, that Oma Hamou works night and day towards getting Bob Atchison put in jail. She wants him to go to jail.
and what has Law Enforcement done after FOUR YEARS?
N O T H I N G
Friday, September 29, 2006
Mike Newson posted:
Despite what you write, a licensed skilled attorney whose field of expertise is preparing a "Bill of Review" plans to submit such document on Oma Hamou's behalf. The attorney there in Texas isn’t concerned with the issues you’ve raised simply because you lack the knowledge of the legal defenses that are available to Oma. More importantly, you haven’t read the pleadings so here’s a suggestion if you’re going to assist Bob Atchison in the preparation of some sort of rebuttal or whatever they call it in the legal circles then the cases you cite and arguments should be included."
Now remember what the same "Mike Newson" wrote:
"Remember everything, absolutely everything, that either Justin or myself have published on this forum we have seen the documentation supporting our words or that it is our personal experience, as we know that this is going to go to court --- as that is what Oma Hamou is devoted to right now. "
and on September 26, 2006
Mike Newson posted:
Oma Hamou is not going to back down. Two Harvard graduates and members of Mensa and a few other groups that are even more rarified and difficult to belong to are working with her towards this next civil suit
SO WHAT HAPPENED IN REALITY?:
OMA HAMOU FILED A ONE PAGE, BADLY WRITTEN, ERROR RIDDEN (SUING HERSELF) DOCUMENT ON THE VERY LAST POSSIBLE DAY SOME THREE FULL YEARS AFTER THIS STATEMENT.
There NEVER was a "new civil suit"
Credibility of "team hamou"?
March 2007:
Quote Mike Newson: "...How does that old saw go? … the wheel of justice grinds ever so painfully slow, yet it does grind exceedingly fine…The last word that I have heard is that they (the legal system) are putting every thing under the legal microscope. Lets face it this is a situation where a mistake in justice can be as serious as the crime that is suspected of being committed. The legal system demands that they know for sure what happened and that they have an iron clad case. My understanding is …so far, so good… That is time will tell, but I tend to feel that what we are experiencing is the calm before the storm, or in Oma’s situation she is in the eye of the storm, all is calm now, but the winds will reverse and the storm will rage again, but this time in the other direction. The plan is that when it happens we will let you know on Oma’s site, (http://www.omahamou.com) which way it happened --- for or against. Although at this stage the rumor that floats back to us is that it is all good for Oma, just hang in there and let ‘them” do their work
THREE PLUS YEARS LATER, AND WHAT HAVE WE HEARD FROM "THE LEGAL SYSTEM"?
N O T H I N G
The Credibility of Oma Hamou?
Thursday, October 11, 2007:
Over and over it has been said Oma Hamou is pursuing a criminal conviction against Bob Atchison, Rob Moshein, Pallasart Web Ventures, Inc.,it's subordinates and a Marcus Demian.
Rumor has it that an Indictment against these various individuals and entites is seriously being considered such as but not limited to Aggravated Harassment in the Second Degree, Conspiracy, Stalking in the Fourth Degree and so on.
THREE FULL YEARS LATER AND WHAT HAS HAPPENED?
N O T H I N G
The Credibility of Oma Hamou aka Alexandra McConnell?
On Wednesday, December 19, 2007 published:
A Preview of Oma Hamou's 2008 Civil Lawsuit Against one Robert D. Atchison a/k/a Bob Atchison a/k/a Czar of Russian History, Robert M. Moshein a/k/a/ Rob Moshein "Austin's Wine Guy" and others...
In addition to the criminal complaint Oma Hamou filed against Bob Atchison, Pallasart Web Ventures (Atchison's small web company) and its associates we've learned Hamou will also file a Twenty Million Dollar civil lawsuit.
THREE YEARS LATER AND WHAT HAS HAPPENED?
LAW SUIT FILED? NO
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT ACTED UPON?? NO
IN SHORT:
N O T H I N G
The Credibility of Oma Hamou aka Alexandra McConnell??:
Monday, December 10, 2007
This Just In...
Classmates.com notified law enforcement who are investigating Oma Hamou's criminal complaint against Bob Atchison et al. they have removed the incorrect memberships (3)in the name of Oma McConnell. They are also investigating the membership under the name Jennifer Albion and will take the appropriate action...
THREE FULL YEARS LATER AND WHAT HAPPENED WITH THIS ALLEGED CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION?
N O T H I N G
Darling Robbele,
It's hard when you're doing it all by yourself, darling.
And now that we know that you are doing it all by yourself, darling Omele, can I make a small suggestion without having my head bitten off? Less typing on the internet, darling. It takes up the valuable time you need to consult with lawyers, the FBI, Mensa (hoo hah, really? The brainiac organization? Darling, how did they get interested in you? Did you do data entry temp work for them or something?) and all of the other court people, district attorneys and such that you have been trying to get to do something for the last five years --- darling, see what happens when you spend the time on the internet? You wind up suing yourself.
And darling Russophile Lady, I'm sorry you don't think I'm smart, but darling, which one of us is buying the first-class ticket on the Titanic at this point? Maybe you haven't lied, darling, but Omele sure as hell has, and you know it. Still, darling, loyalty to friends is a wonderful thing, even if many of them seem to be imaginary friends.
So exciting, darling! I can't wait to hear how Justin Edwards feels about being a co-star in your ongoing soap opera, darling!
Perhaps he will care, darling, and not sue you! Why wouldn't he? I do, darling!
Mitzele
Oma Hamou seems to be freaking out.
She engaged John F. Thompson, Jr. & Associates to send a certified letter to Eric Cowan, threatening to sue him for tens of thousands of dollars for passing along information about her rental escapade with him.
A google search of this attorney leads to a weblist called "cheaponline", where cut-rate services are offered. The Thompson group, which is billed on this site as a "Cheap Attorney", offers to send out threatening letters for $150. (Wonder if they take checks?)
Interesting that Hamou is freaking out about information received from Cowan after claiming we were lying about having talked to Cowan.
At any rate, have a whole new raft of information coming in as a result.
It seems Hamou's filing to get the Cowan record sealed (which ran to many dozens of pages of incoherent rants) included a sworn statement that she has custody of small children whose lives are threatened by Rob Moshein and Bob Atchison and that she has been targeted by gunfire.
Cowan has talked to an attorney about a perjury charge, and the attorney recommended that Cowan go to the police about it.
Of course, the Cowans know that Hamou is not about to show her face in a court room voluntarily and that Hamou has a history of throwing out spurious legal and pseudo-legal maneuvers in an attempt to deflect revelations about her activities.
Sort of like a cornered skunk releasing its spray.
Thanks for emailing me the new information, Blake. Perhaps Rob shouold consider paying Oma's new law firm $175 to get them to try and recover Bob Atchison's money from her.
RJ
Someone sent me a video from 2009 of the real Justin Edwards this evening. It's the same person whose picture someone sent me that was used as the avatar by the "Justin" poster on that Legend of Anastasia forum.
It will be interesting to get the reaction of the Edwards family when they see the avatar picture and find out the claims the person using the name and image of Justin Edwards has made on the internet about Bob Atchison committing forgery and perjury.
Interesting video Blake.
The Justin Edwards in the video is without doubt the same person in the Legends of Anastasia forum avatar, but is NOT, without doubt, the scrawny, homeless dressed weasel person I saw in court with Oma Hamou. No question these are not the same people. None. NOT even close.
It truly looks as if Oma Hamou Alexandra McConnell stole Justin Edwards's identity for her purposes
Dear guys,
Oma Hamou is once again posting under the name "Handmaiden". She is now accusing Mr. Cowan's girlfriend of committing perjury during the hearing on her eviction and default of rent payments --- that would be the judgment that went against her, of course. Yet again the American legal system has been hoodwinked.
My favorite comment is ascribed to an unknown friend of "Handmaiden's", if imaginary people can be said to have friends. "He" tut-tutted that if what is said on this forum is true, then Oma Hamou would be in jail.
Sweetheart. Oma. Girlfriend. You were in jail. With any luck, you will be again.
Rebecca
RJ
Oma Hamou/Alexandra McConnell has a typical pattern:
Accuse the victim of being a "criminal"
THEN she floods the voicemail box of law enforcement officers investigating her with many dozen calls per day. Literally. I know for a fact that some police agents have gotten 28 calls a DAY from her.
Oma Oma Oma,
Do you REALLY think calling these people "liars" or "criminals" is going to end well for you????
Really?
Really????
Handmaiden-who-is-Oma posted:
"but she [Oma] is definitely seriously offended that either Eric Cowan or his girlfriend would talk to any member of the Rob/Bob cabal at all, since they had been informed from the beginning about the harm those cretins had already caused Oma"
Well, you see, Oma, it's like this. Cowan did let you sign a lease under what he knew was an alias because of this story you told him.
But what happened?
Well, you proceeded to trash his house, write bad checks to him, show up in court with an altered document, and then disappear from subsequent hearings when you got caught at that stunt.
In other words, your own conduct substantiated the things said about you on the internet.
You wonder why people who have encountered you are consistently willing talk to us? Well, it's simply because they have first-hand experience of the behavior we report. Consequently, they believe us instead of you.
As for the claims about small children -- you claimed in that motion that you have custody of children. First, there is one child. No "children". And second, "custody" is a term applied to minors (or prisoners), not to an adult son who lives with his mother from time to time.
Darling Omele,
Little Imperial lives with you? Darling, that's lovely! Of course, it would be even lovelier if you could teach the little fellow some respect for police officers (and you could do it, darling! Look at how you are always calling them "nice" when you post as "Snoopy", darling! I'm sure they appreciate it!). Or maybe Imperial could do what Darling Russophile Lady's sons did and join the army, darling! Over here they make all the boys do it, darling, and let me tell you, it can really straighten them out! Not for anything, but Mrs. Rabinowitz's boy Bernard? A new person since his service. And trust me, you don't want to know what the little pisher was like! Hoo hah, the stories I could tell!
Meanwhile, darling, is it wise to continue filching poor "Justin Edwards'" identity like that? Oy, Oma of my Heart, I don't think he's going to be best pleased! Now, I know what you're going to say, darling. And you're probably going to say it as "Handmaiden", darling, because that's your character you think sounds smart. "But his identity was just sitting there going to waste! Of course I filched it! It's like Don Morton's money! Or Hamid Refai's money! Why should it go to their families when I needed it!"
Oh. Well, maybe you're not the best person to instruct little Imperial about the finer points of social responsibility.
Darling Omele! I know what you can do! Join the army, darling! They can teach you and then you can pass it along to darling Imperial!
Do they take people with police records, darling? We don't over here, but maybe things are a bit more slack in the States.
Uncle Sam wants you, Oma Hamou!
Mitzi Kedem
Mitzi Kedem wrote:
"Uncle Sam wants you, Oma Hamou!"
On so many levels, Mitzi.
I think Oma Hamou has started to channel Richard Nixon. I can't see anything else that makes sense.
She has resorted to the mind numbing repetition of WAY too large documents over and over, trying to avoid the genuine issue.
Nixon tried the same tactics. Scream bloody murder about Watergate getting LEAKED to cover up the genuine CRIMINAL activity that it revealed.
IF Oma Hamou had NOT written bad checks to Eric Cowan, we never would have heard from them.
IF Oma Hamou had just PAID her rent on time, Eric Cowan would NEVER have evicted her.
IF Oma Hamou had NOT written a check on a closed account to Huiku Batchelor, Alexandra McConnell aka Hamou NEVER would have been slapped in handcuffs, tossed into a Sheriff's cruiser and landed in JAIL to face Felony Forgery charges.
Hell, Oma even has her own version of the "Enemies List", she calls them "stalkers" and lies under oath just like Nixon did...
Freud is having a field day:
"Oma was a scammer, a career criminal and all sorts of stuff so she just figured it was all true and called the cops. This is the truth."
PLUS Oma/Alexandra. You leave out the MOST IMPORTANT PART:
1. The POLICE believed it, THAT is WHY they slapped handcuffs on you and took you to jail.
2. Bryan Stodghill's DA OFFICE BELIEVED IT. Which is WHY they pressed charges on you for a full YEAR and kept your feet to the fire to pay VICTIM RESTITUTION or go to PRISON.
She is attempting to deflect one of the salient issues: Oma Hamou a/k/a Alexandra McConnell a/k/ Oma Louis McConnell a/k/a Rebecca Jordan (the pain, the pain) has stolen the identity of "Justin Edwards" of the American Film Institute, and is using it to publish libel and slander on the internet.
In the welter of documents, none of which support a damn thing she is charging, it is easy to lose sight of her basic modus operandi. She is a professional criminal.
I enjoyed the video as well. The real Justin Edwards seems like a well-spoken, caring young man. Certainly not the kind of low level white trash who spews so much profanity and coarseness on the internet.
RJ
Quite right RJ,
It can NOT be coincidence that THIS Justin Edwards is a dead match for the Justin Edwards avatar, sitting backwards on the chair, with cigarette, yet NEITHER look anything like the scrawny ill dressed kid Oma had carrying her boxes of stuff in Court.
It CAN'T be coincidence that snoopy isn't screaming up and down that we are wrong, as it would usually do, but rather is trying VERY hard to change the subject...
So Oma again spins a convoluted tale of how it was just a misfortunate misunderstanding that caused her to write Huiki Batchelor a check on a closed account.
The only problem is that she's written so many checks on closed accounts: to Wild West Productions, to Monique Hahn, to Mrs. Batchelor, to Eric Cowan, to people who have contacted Nancy's Reseda Screen & Glass looking for her.
Nobody has this many check-writing "accidents", and people with a lick of common sense know it.
Don't forget Blake, that the San Bernardino Sheriff's department ARRESTED Alexandra McConnell AND the San Bernardino District Attorney charged her with Felony forgery FOR OVER A FULL YEAR before she paid COURT ORDERED VICTIM RESTITUTION.
This just doesn't happen for an "unfortunate misunderstanding" for "grabbing the wrong check" and everyone with a lick of sense knows that.
Still the same old babbling. It will make for interesting reading, though.
Hi Anonymous.
How's things in Foothill Ranch, right by Irvine and Rancho Santa Margarita?
Good morning, my dears. And Happy Thanksgiving to you all!
I know that Ms. Hamou / McConnell's little check-writing accidents and her continuing tribulations in court are a source of some amusement to all of us here.
But in the spirit of the holiday, I just want to say that I think it's wonderful she has a new friend.
Oh, and before I forget. I just found the most desolate little black cat at the pound. He looked a bit trampled when I found him, probably a reflection of where he'd been hanging around. But I've got him all bathed and brushed now, and who knows? One day he might become almost presentable.
Well, enjoy your turkey, everyone! I'm off to help my sister Prunella put on her feast later this week.
This is too HYSTERICAL,
I would LOVE to know who google searched: "large-jawed woman" oma and found this blog! Too funny but true.
So, it appears that simply withdrawing her Bankruptcy petition from the Court will not stop a Perjury prosecution against Oma Hamou if she indeed did lie on the document:
The statute, 18 U.S.C. 1621, substantially identical in its relevant language to its predecessors for nearly a century, is "a federal statute enacted in an effort to keep the course of justice free from the pollution of perjury." United States v. Williams, 341 U.S. 58, 68 (1951). The Supreme Court have held that the general federal perjury provision is applicable to federal bankruptcy proceedings. Hammer v. United States, 271 U.S. 620 (1926). The need for truthful testimony in a 21 (a) bankruptcy proceeding is great, since the proceeding is "a searching inquiry into the condition of the estate of the bankrupt, to assist in discovering and collecting the assets, and to develop facts and circumstances which bear upon the question of discharge." Travis v. United States, 123 F.2d 268, 271 (CA10 1941).
Further another case held "[f]or the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1621, an answer containing half of the truth which also constitutes a lie by negative implication, when the answer is intentionally given in place of the responsive answer called for by a proper question, is perjury." 453 F.2d 555, 559. emph. added.
The consequences of perjury in bankruptcy cases are no laughing matter. Your attorney will have a hard time getting you out of any of the following punishments for bankruptcy perjury:
* Up to 5 years jail time in a federal prison.
* Fines of $250,000 or more.
* Loss of bankruptcy case discharge or debt forgiveness.
* Publication of your bankruptcy perjury case in public notices for all to see.
* You credit record will list bankruptcy and perjury.
False Statement Under Penalty of Perjury, 18 U.S.C. § 152(3)—Omission of Assets on Bankruptcy Petition and Schedules
IS PERJURY!
So, Oma Hamou aka Alexandra McConnell, I know you're reading (THIS is the correct usage, you really must stop that ignorant using "your" incorrectly) since Palmadale reads regularly, twice already just today, even though you remain silent. At least this time it seems you aren't in jail, unlike certain Thanksgivings previous...
Bear the Federal Perjury in Bankruptcy laws carefully in mind, for when the FBI calls upon me (snicker) I'll make certain they are up to date on your Petition...if, of course, they don't find out on their own before then.
Happy Thanksgiving to all, Blake at his in laws, RJ with her family, Mitz and the Kibbutzniks, Ms P and new cat...
Eh, oui, Mon cher chat noir.
I think THAT is what you should name the new dear little one Penelope!
Chat Noir! or Shanoir.... it fits.
On this day, I give thanks for the TRUTH about Oma Hamou Alexandra McConnell and her criminal activities being known and her victims collaborating with each other.
Some truths:
Oma Hamou Said: November 11, 2004 Via sockpuppet "Justin Edwards"
We won't know when until probably next week when to upload the timeline presentation, as the law enforcement are investigating stalking, harassment, fraud, forgery, tampering with evidence and some other things that are holding things up. So we need to wait until the law enforcement people say we can. ... We don't want to taint the criminal investigation." all this supposedly against Bob and me.
Oma Hamou TRUTH:: There was NO "law enforcement" or "criminal" investigation. In REALITY nothing happened, at all. SIX YEARS and still nothing.
Oma Hamou SAID: August 30, 2006: "at least one District Attorney / Attorney General was significantly shocked/concerned by the total effort documented in the 200 plus pages of documents submitted by (her) to various law enforcement agencies, and that were verified by their officers/agents and turned over to them that they are willing to prosecute. we know that this is going to go to court --- as that is what Oma Hamou is devoted to right now. we all (Oma’s friends and former employees of Enigma and such) have absolute confidence in the lead lawyer. We’ve been patiently waiting to file the next round of briefs until the attorneys get all the transcripts in, which I’m told will be sometime next week, with any luck. I know that we have been expecting this to happen for some time, but the court reporter has been awfully busy with other trials that put our request on the back burner. Tell you what, when the brief gets filed (3 briefs) we will publish on this forum their links so people can read and judge for themselves.
OMA HAMOU TRUTH: NOTHING HAPPENED. FOUR FULL YEARS NOW AND NOTHING HAPPENED.
Oma Hamou said:
Oma Hamou Said: September 17, 2006 Sockpuppet "Mike Newson" wrote: "As to Oma, I know for a fact, she is busy reviewing transcripts, police reports and such because as I understand it they’ve got less than 3 weeks to file that pleading and the clock is ticking. I also know that her criminal complaint is being taken seriously and since I personally have provided Affidavits and such I know that it is real.
OMA HAMOU TRUTH: NOTHING HAPPENED. FOUR YEARS NOW AND NOTHING.
OMA HAMOU SAID: April 26, 2009:
Oma Hamou said:
Just today that she "paid over $5,000 to THE ATTORNEY to file a brief in FEDERAL COURT against Bob and Pallasart and like I said you can talk until you blue in the face and cite cases that makes you sound like you know what your talking about, but your not the court and you ain't seen nothing yet, but you will.
OMA HAMOU TRUTH: NOTHING HAPPENED. NOTHING WAS FILED IN FEDERAL COURT OR ANYWHERE ELSE.
SORRY "JUSTIN" WHO IS OMA HAMOU, BUT "I AIN'T SEEN NOTHING YET.
and I never will.
Yes, I give thanks that the entire world knows, thanks to her victims and the public record that Oma Hamou/Alexandra McConnell is a lying bitch.
Hi Oma aka Alexandra. You just read both my blogs at exactly 4pm Central/2pm Pacific from LANCASTER as always. Guess it must have been a nice change to NOT BE IN JAIL on Thanksgiving for a change?
Dear everyone,
Hope you all had a fabulous Thanksgiving. I certainly did! Back in the city today to take care of a few last minute things. Frobe is going to spend the next ten days at my brother's.
Off to Prague tomorrow night! Will post as I can!
Blake, I emailed you the text of the email & attached files I will send to Professor Edwards. If you can proof it and get it back to me by tomorrow morning, I will send it before I go. If not, no big deal. I will leave it in your capable hands.
Talk to you soon!
RJ
RJ
Bon Voyage! Travel safe and have a wonderful time. I spoke with Blake yesterday, and I'll help him out if he needs anything.
We now enter the 466th consecutive week without any law enforcement contact, with me or Bob since Oma Hamou/Alexandra McConnell started threatening it.
This is the 235th consecutive week since Oma Hamou wrote to a Texas District Court Judge that she had in fact "sworn out complaints with the FBI and Attorney General's office" against me and Bob, with NOTHING HAPPENING.
November 11, 2004
We won't know when until probably next week when to upload the timeline presentation, as the law enforcement are investigating stalking, harassment, fraud, forgery, tampering with evidence and some other things that are holding things up. So we need to wait until the law enforcement people say we can. ... We don't want to taint the criminal investigation.
SIX YEARS BUT NOTHING ever manages to happen... she says she HAS filed these complaints, but...Nothing.
Consecutive Week 271 for nothing happening in the most recent round of threat of lawsuits against us, since Bob won his suit against Oma Hamou.
September 17, 2006: "As to Oma, I know for a fact, she is busy reviewing transcripts, police reports and such because as I understand it they’ve got less than 3 weeks to file that pleading and the clock is ticking. I also know that her criminal complaint is being taken seriously and since I personally have provided Affidavits and such I know that it is real.
April 26, 2009:
Just today she "paid over $5,000 to THE ATTORNEY to file a brief in FEDERAL COURT against Bob and Pallasart and like I said you can talk until you blue in the face and cite cases that makes you sound like you know what your talking about, but your not the court and you ain't seen nothing yet, but you will.
AND NOTHING HAPPENED.
TWO HUNDRED SEVENTY ONE WEEKS, over 1,897 days, 67 months, over five and a half full years! 460 separate claims of "impending" "immediate" "we promise its happening" legal litigation, but nothing ever happens. What shred of credibility can anyone have who makes the same statement almost daily for OVER FIVE FULL YEARS, but never actually does anything.
August 30, 2006: "at least one District Attorney / Attorney General was significantly shocked/concerned by the total effort documented in the 200 plus pages of documents submitted by (her) to various law enforcement agencies, and that were verified by their officers/agents and turned over to them that they are willing to prosecute. we know that this is going to go to court --- as that is what Oma Hamou is devoted to right now. we all (Oma’s friends and former employees of Enigma and such) have absolute confidence in the lead lawyer. We’ve been patiently waiting to file the next round of briefs until the attorneys get all the transcripts in, which I’m told will be sometime next week, with any luck.
FOUR YEARS AND NOTHING.
And, NOTHING happening now for OVER ONE WHOLE YEAR on the fictional "Bill of Review"…Which is now dismissed for lack of prosecution (DWOP) according to Court Records
We are also now past week 35 of the "TRO" being requested"tomorrow" or "by the end of the week..." "the lawyers are working on it"...Wasn't FAT debbie the one who "PROMISED" to post it the moment it was issued?? And a full EIGHTEEN WEEKS now since "snoopy" said CLEARLY "is why a California Judge granted a restraining order against the Nut."
So far, it hasn't appeared...Nothing has.
More threats, more veiled hints...MORE "complaints filed with the FBI" who still haven't come pounding on my door, much less have not even read my blog yet…,AFTER THIRTEEN WHOLE WEEKS NOW. THREE WHOLE MONTHS. NADA
same stuff for OVER FIVE YEARS and NOTHING EVER HAPPENS..
Darling Rivka,
Happy travels, darling! I hope you enjoy yourselves. We're all meeting in Aruba after the New Year because, darling, central Europe in winter? Not so much for these old bones.
Darling Robbele, how can you say that nothing ever happens? Oma Hamou goes to jail, she gets evicted from houses, she loses court cases against her, she sues herself, she gets caught making up stories, she gets caught stealing the poor boy's identity, her son gets in trouble with the law, she puts on weight, she gets evicted from more houses, she gets nailed by her housemates for various shady activities --- darling, a lot happens!
I swear to G-d, sometimes you need a scorecard to keep track.
Mitzele
Well, of COURSE Mitz.
Oma Hamou does a LOT of things.
She makes THREATS but nothing ever happens with them.
She "promises" her "lawyers" are BUSY on litigation but nothing ever happens, EXCEPT OMA HAMOU ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL GETS SUED BY OTHER PEOPLE AND SHE NEVER SHOWS IN COURT.
She files a one page, illiterate document called "Bill of Review" BUT SHE DOES NOTHING WITH IT SO THE COURT DISMISSES IT FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.
She "swears" that Law enforcement agencies are "investigating" Bob and me but nothing ever happens
EXCEPT Law Enforcement DOES investigate Oma Hamou/Alexandra McConnell.
She "swears" that Bob and I are going to end up in jail, but nothing ever happens EXCEPT OMA HAMOU ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL ENDS UP IN JAIL...
I could go on, but you get the point.
Oh and Mitz, consider my new blog, OmaHamouVictims.blogspot.com as the "scorecard" for what Oma Hamou actually does...
Happy Chanukah early!
The newspaper article I was part of just came out in the online version. The print version runs in the local paper Dec. 9.
Enjoy:
http://www.austin360.com/blogs/content/shared-gen/blogs/austin/outandabout/entries/2010/11/28/walking_through.html?cxntfid=blogs_out_about
Oh, my dearest Mr. Moshein. What a delightful article! I never knew Austin was such an architectural smorgasbord.
And reading about the "treasure trove" of czarist art in your home, I just loved the reporter's remark about Russian royalty staring down at your party guests.
I wonder if Ms. Hamou / McConnell's guests get that same feeling with the giant poster of her dressed as Empress Alexandra with the Korean flag waving over her head staring down at them.
Oh, I'm sure they do, dear. I'm sure they do.
If, of course, she's still at the same address that was on the party invitations.
Well, ta-ta my pets. I'm still trying to recover from Thanksgiving madness and the futility of Black Friday. Not a doily sale anywhere. Not one. And I looked, let me tell you. I looked.
Darling Pennele,
So glad your holiday was a success, darling. Darling Russophile Lady was near terrorists, or as we like to call it over here in Israel, in the backyard.
Darling Oma watched television and got a chance to see one of the darling police officers she claims gave her a clean bill of health, although of course how much faith can you put in anything that darling Omele says? She kind of undercut herself by posting as the poor boy whose identity she stole. Oy, she's a piece of work.
I spent today polishing Aunt Masada's menorah in preparation for Chanukah. I will be making latkes out the wazoo, Robbele, not that I need them, but for the grandchildren. I can't believe how early it is this year!
Mitzi
Odd how Lancaster read the blog today. Then the co conspirator in Portland and only THREE minutes later Foothill Ranch, near Irvine again.
THAT reminds me. Ms P, how is Shanoir adjusting? I hope the new dear little cat is liking your lovely home, thankfully devoid of self promotional cheap posters.
Mitz,
I miss my Grandma Rose's Latkes very much. They were the second best part of Chanukah, after the presents!
I shared her recipe with the food editor of the local paper last spring, and she will be printing it this week for the holiday!
I'm making some myself here. For the first time in years, I have my Grandfather's menorah to light.
awww Oma, the drunk rant you posted pretending to be snoopy who pretends to be Justin Edwards was MUCH funnier before the edit. No thanks, not interested in oral sex with any of your sock puppets! and the sentence fragments were hysterical.
I know you claim we've "harmed" Oma Hamou by telling the world the TRUTH about her, but frankly, Oma, you cause yourself far more harm by writing bad checks, skipping out on rent, getting evicted, getting ARRESTED, getting THROWN IN JAIL and scamming old men out of money by pretending to have cancer.
All we have to do is sit back and enjoy the show, and cooperate with the police and the other victims of your criminal activities. You bring it all down on yourself.
Prague is BEAUTIFUL. And no one told me about the FOOD.
Hope all are well, we are having a fabulous time so far. No jet lag at ALL, which is amazing.
Best to all!
Rebecca
Cherry Hill New Jersey??
You are missing the point, Oma. When you pretended to be "Justin Edwards" you used the boy's face and made up a backstory. You have absolutely claimed to be "Justin Edwards" time and again, both on your own forum and on the shill Legend of Anastasia Forum. You used his picture. It's a little late in the day to be claiming "I had to hide who I am" for this particular sock puppet.
You aren't the guy who was in the courtroom with Rob that day, either. You were there alright, Oma, but you weren't me.
Suck it, Oma, you're caught lying again.
Justin
Since three or four of you wrote asking what the original "snoopy" drunken rant was yesterday, here it is. I still had the original page up in a different browser. Enjoy. It STILL cracks me up:
To Rob and Bob suck my dick assholes because I fucking don''t fucking care you find the guy in Texas parents because I have on numerous times on this forum refused to provide you criminal stalkers my true name or any other private information about me which would lead you to my home so you can fucking stalk my wife and my children as you have attempted to do to Debbie and her daughter. Again, suck my cock and choke on that motherfuckers!
THAT is how Oma Hamou REALLY writes. Notice the similarities to this email Oma Hamou send me five years ago, 10/6/05:
Rob,
You really are an asshole!
I was sincere about my offer to settle.
Who cares about my corporate or personal debt?
You yourself owe money, you jerk!
I have all the dirt on you, you scum bag -
Talk about jealous - you are not employed. You have receive money from others--
Thanks for showing me and others what a pig you really and truly are!
At least I've done something worthwile with my life and you?
Nothing!
I put you on notice you scum of the earth IF you dare to write any letter to any business associate of mine claiming to them that I am in essence this con artist and have no project you will regret it.
Also your emails between Patricia, John, Bob and yourself and Enigma's office shows that you all concocted this big fucking lie against me.
We will file the appeal and re-file my lawsuit and go back in court and reinstate my restraining order agaisnt a psychopath who obviously is hell bent on making my life miserable - Which you never did do Oma
Oy, Omele, sweetheart, bubbele, is that the kind of talk that makes your mother proud? I'm so embarrassed for you, darling. Darling, you have a child. Is this the kind of example you want to set? I don't think so!
And what's with all the "suck" talk all of a sudden, boys and girls? I know that our "Justin" is trying to clean up his life, but boychik, I have to tell you, if Omele doesn't get to tell people to suck her you-know-whatsis, neither do you, young man! I know you have no children, but what about the darling cat that used to seize control of your keyboard and post for you? Is this the kind of thing you want the poor pussycat to hear?
Omele, darling, some advice? You don't mind? Of course you don't, darling! Because you know Tante Mitzeleh cares, darling!
Get hold of a lawyer, darling, because you are going to need one. I know it was fun to pretend you were "Justin Edwards" and that you had a schlong and all, darling, but I am afraid that the storm, as they say, is coming. You're going to need some protection. Or at least a new place to hide.
I hear Portland is nice, darling.
"Again, suck my cock and choke on that motherfuckers!"
Always articulate.
Always classy.
Always Oma.
Blake,
That is the TRUE Oma Hamou coming out. She always goes into these rages when things don't work out for her (translate: she gets caught in her lies).
I think this rant is because the Court dismissed the Bill of Review and clearly didn't buy her bogus tales.
I also suspect the FBI finally told her to stop calling them twenty times a day, like she did to Art Fortune here, and the LAPD officer investigating the Morton case...
With not Bill of Review or FBI "investigation" (snicker) she has nothing left but her let loose her no class gutter born true roots.
Okay, folks, here's the skinny on the "Justin Edwards" situation. I just talked to the real Justin Edwards' father.
His son has been in the Los Angeles area for the past year, where he is working at the American Film Institute, but before that he was in Kenya.
Professor Edwards says that his son did attend graduate school in Austin, but that his son was living at home in 2005 and made no trips to Austin at the time that Oma Hamou had a young man help her carry boxes into the courtroom in Austin and who she later claimed on the internet was Justin Edwards.
It's interesting that the prospect of our contacting Justin Edwards caused "snoopy" to unleash such a foul, drunken rant the other day.
In any case, Professor Edwards gave me the means of contacting his son in Los Angeles, which I have now done. I will apprise you all of his response.
Darling Blakele,
So exciting, darling, like an episode of The Streets of San Francisco, and can I just say, oy, that Karl Malden?
She seems to have gone quiet, maybe out of shame for the potty mouth? Who knows and who cares, darling, at least everyone gets a break from "suck this" and "suck that".
"Justin", thanks for the email about your language. I know I'm a fuddy-duddy, but all I can think is that your mothers raised you better than that. At least I hope yours did. Poor Omele's mother! The potty mouth is the least of her worries!
Mitzele
Add to it Mitz that the REAL Justin Edwards (not THAT real Justin, the other one, the one who's identity she stole) has been contacted AND his father Prof. Edwards read my blog this morning from the University where he teaches.
Things should become very interesting soon.
Well, the mystery deepens.
It turns out that the email Professor Edwards gave for Justin Edwards was not a good email address. So I spoke to someone in the production unit at the American Film Institute, who gave me a different email address.
It seems that Justin Edwards must have received that email and contacted his father.
Also, this blog has now had hits from AFI, the University of Colorado, and Bowling Green University.
The fame of Oma Hamou -- noted movie producer, model, actress, and charity president -- continues to spread.
We'll wait to see whether it's going to take a lawsuit against Mr. Edwards to get to the bottom of those posts that Oma Hamou says came from Justin Edwards, whose picture was used as an avatar for "Justin" on her earlier "Legends of Anastasia" forum, where she began the attacks on Rob Moshein and Bob Atchison and the Alexander Palace Time Machine website.
Oh, dear.
With all these new readers, I do hope Ms. Hamou / McConnell will resist the urge to plaster eons-old soft-core pornography shots of herself all over her forum yet again.
Although, I must admit, it's been a while since we've been treated to the shot of her with her short shorts unzipped and her honey patch almost greeting the sunrise, while she teasingly puts her finger in her mouth and smiles provocatively. Or the one where, with her back to the camera and her pert little buttocks sticking out, she brandishes a handgun and looks back invitingly over her shoulder.
One can never have too much of the classics, my pets. Never.
No wonder a young man such as Justin Edwards would be so taken with her that he would rush to her defense when the law and process servers come calling. Which, alas, my sweets, is just so distressingly often.
Of course, he has perhaps not seen her since her more recent incarcerations, lost lawsuits, check-writing accidents, constant cat feedings, and evictions took their toll.
Oh, dear me. I do hope the young man understands all for which he has signed up.
So, I remembered something. Went back to July 2009 where "Justin Edwards" was screaming because "Justin Edward" was "pretending to be him" and how he had gone to Google to file a complaint, and then he said
I provided my DL to find out which one of you assholes are pretending to be me"
Now, if "Justin Edwards" is NOT the name on his driver's license, then "Justin Edward" couldn't be pretending to be "Justin Edwards"
SO, how come now 18 months later, "snoopy" says "Justin Edwards" isn't really his name because he doesn't want to be "stalked"??
Funny how "Justin Edwards" has been "Justin Edwards" for what? eight years now? Remember "Aloha"?? Shall I go back to the 2005 Forum records where "Justin Edwards" INSISTS his name IS "Justin Edwards" and that "affidavits" were sworn out under the NAME "Justin Edwards"??
I think the real "Justin Edwards" at the American Film Institute might not appreciate the many years of libel, slander and outright LIES which have been posted using his name by Oma Hamou/Alexandra McConnell...
and this one:
Justin Edwards has left a new comment on the post "Alexandra Oma McConnell is on Trial for Forgery":
To the fake me,
I provided my Drivers license when I filed my complaint against you, it is against the law to impersonate someone so you can commit the crime of harassment.
I intend to prosecute you and do whatever it takes to see you stop impersonating me. Can't wait to see who you really are hiding behind my name.
To Bob/ Rob I'm outta of here.
Thanks for providing fresh new evidence which will be used against you.
Until tommorrow ---
Ciao monkeys!
Well, Rob ... now that we know Justin Edwards at the American Film Institute has received the correspondence asking him to clarify his involvement with Oma Hamou, we'll either hear from him with a denial that he has been posting on Oma Hamou's forums, or you'll have a legal cause of action against him.
Ball in his court.
It's really just that simple.
Hmmm. I wonder why we've not heard from Michele Biernat at Benefit Design Group in Portland about all this.
She did, after all, post that she had talked to "snoopy" and could vouch that he was who he said he was and not Oma Hamou.
And, you know, it's occurred to me that there could be an upside in all this for Oma herself. She's always wanted to be in the movies, you see. Maybe some enterprising fellow at AFI who hears this story will see the potential for a good documentary in it.
And they might even let her appear as herself, although I suspect the Korean flag won't be in the shots. The tatty ball gown might make it, though. It would lend real color to the portrayal of the psychoses any credible documentary could not skirt.
Ah, Biernat, see you're back.
Have you talked to Justin Edwards recently? Or just that time you confirmed "Snoopy" was him, as Hamou claimed?
Darling Russophile Lady,
Soexciting, darling! Now the "Project" has cost estimates! Darling, it's likke you're building an atomic bomb!
But darling Blakele does have a point, darling! When you spoke to "Snoopy", did "he" explain why he was using a filched identity? Or did you notice that his voice was suspiciously high?
Oy, darling, how do you type with your eyes so tightly closed???
I ask because I care, darling! You know that!
Mitzi Kedem, darling
Nope, pretty easy to see who's reading. Yep the Conspirator Biernat read, and Lincroft NJ, next to Cherry Hill, four times. Just because I can't see someone's exact location doesn't mean I'm wrong. Google analytics tracks every single hit, can't avoid it. Lincroft/Cherry Hill its all the same.
Just like Tigar/Tualatin are all still Portland, the low rent part of Portland, but Portland.
Oma Hamou needs to stop drinking, or smoking crack.
FIRST, The only IP that reads when "snoopy" responds is Palmdale.
More importantly, "snoopy" who is Oma Hamou pretending to be "Justin Edwards" who pretends "he" has "a real name that isn't "Justin Edwards"" wants anyone to "believe" that "he" had the following conversation with "Law Enforcement"
"snoopy": Hi, someone is pretending to be me on google blogs, but see, they are pretending to be "Justin Edwards". Here is my drivers license, which isn't "Justin Edwards", "Justin Edwards" is just the fake name I use on the internet. "Justin Edwards" isn't my REAL name, but they are still pretending to use my FAKE name... DO SOMETHING because this person is pretending to be the name I'M pretending to be...."
Seriously Oma. Lay off the Forty Ouncers and hits of rock...it isn't pretty. But then, neither are you...
Darling Omele,
Seriously, darling, listen to Robbele. It's true he doesn't care about you the way that Tante Mitzeleh does --- in fact, darling, I don't think he cares for you at all --- but darling, he's right. You need to stop doing things that affect you this way, darling, and by "this way" I mean things that make you sound stupid. Darling, you have been claiming to be "Justin Edwards" for years, and I think you owe the real Justin Edwards of the American Film Institute some explanation as to why you have stolen his identity, darling. It isn't nice.
Caring so much, darling. Caring so much.
Mitzeleh
Don't you just love Hamou's logic?
She claims that "Snoopy" had to give a fake identity because otherwise he and his family will suffer all kinds of horrors at our hands.
So she then gives out the identity of a real person as "Snoopy" ...... and she chooses a person who works in film and who has connections with Austin, just to make the identity theft as convincing as possible.
In other words, she is perfectly willing to have all the horrible things that she claims are certain to happen to happen to someone who once had the misfortune to cross her path as a contractor.
But I guess when you've supported yourself for years with identity theft, it's a hard habit to break.
Right, Oma Hamou? Or is it Alexandra McConnell? Or Oma Chedid? Or Jordan Taylor? Or Rebecca Jordan? Or Oma Ashkenazy? Or ............
Ahoj, everyone!
First of all, the trip is wonderful. The people are terrific, nearly everyone speaks English, thank God, and Prague was one of the prettiest cities I have ever visited. Leighton is taking lots of photos. We leave in the morning for Vienna. Kafee mit Schlag und Linzertorte, here we come!
Second of all, is Oma kidding with the whole "I showed them my driver's license"? Which one was that, Oma, the expired one that you showed Mr. Cowan? Or had you created one of those fake IDs we all had in high school to get us into bars?
Third, BFF, what on earth are you and "AnonymousOne" doing, conducting all of your secret plotting right out there on the internet? If it is supposed to intimidate Rob or Blake or Mitzi or Penelope or any of the rest of the posters here, it doesn't seem to be working.
Third, who dragged "Justin Edwards" into this? Rob? But, Oma, you were the one who stole his face and identity and used it to post slander and libel out on the internet, thereby making him liable. You might want to think about posting an official disclaimer explaining that you lost your head when you used his picture and name, and that now you will post as "Snoopy" under your real name.
Your real name. What can you use? You do not exactly have a felicitous touch when it comes to inventing names (except for "Rebecca Jordan", but she was a real person too, right? I mean, the "Rebecca Jordan" whose identity you stole). Let's see. How about "Thorkjild Olafsson"? "Alejandro Rojas"? "Smith-Jones Hertfordshire"? "Alexander Nevsky Prospekt"? "Rufus T. Firefly"?
Auf wiedersehen,
Rebecca
Don't forget "Allison Whitmore" and "Alicia Whitehorse", "Charlotte Rose" (which always amused me because that is both of my grandmothers' names!)
"Larissa Feinstein", "Stan Sutherkind", "Merina", "JazzyD", "Laura Sheffield"
Good morning, all. I just had an interesting conversation with an attorney in Bowling Green, Ohio whom Professor Edwards has retained to represent his son regarding claims that Justin Edwards is posting defamatory claims on the internet.
He pointed out that Justin Edwards is a film maker who focuses on international charitable work who works in Los Angeles and would not likely be associated with Oma Hamou. I pointed out that Oma Hamou claims to be a film producer in Los Angeles and the head of an international charity, the Sarskaia Foundation. I also pointed out that Oma Hamou claims Justin Edwards attended legal proceedings in Austin, Texas and that Justin Edwards did, in fact, attend school in Austin.
We agreed that it is not likely these would be points of mere coincidence. While the attorney maintains that Justin Edwards would not be involved with Oma Hamou, he now understands that we are going to have to have more than just his assurance in order to forestall legal action to get to the bottom of "Snoopy's" real identity.
So the attorney will be discussing this matter with Justin Edwards to try to determine how, if Justin Edwards is not the real poster, Oma Hamou might have so much personal information about him that she would choose his identity.
In fact, the attorney now seems as interested as we are in how Oma Hamou might have stolen his client's identity and used it to post defamatory claims about perjury, fraud, and active FBI investigations.
Who knows, maybe he'll even be interested in how Michele Biernat of Benefit Design Group in Portland was able to confirm on the internet that she had spoken with "Snoopy" and could assure us he was who Oma Hamou said he was.
More as more news comes in.
Oh, my dears. The prospect of a connection between Mr. Justin Edwards and Ms. Hamou / McConnell is just so exciting.
With his "in" at the American Film Institute, perhaps he could help get Ms. Hamou / McConnell a fellowship there to assist her with funding her major epic on the Romanovs? I'm sure if the admissions committee were just given a script for A Matter of Honour, they'd have to pick themselves up off the floor after reading it.
And who knows, my pets? Maybe the Edwards connection at AFI could even provide something for Debbie -- if, of course, those smart, smart people at Advanced Paralegal would let her have a leave of absence for a bit of dabbling in the art of film. Frankly, as much as I simply adore his genius for the sleazy and absurd, I just feel that John Waters has been wandering in the creative wilderness a bit since Divine died. He does so seem to need a new and suitably ample muse.
Then, if Debbie's acting talents aren't quite up the task of wearing la Divine's pumps, there is always the spot left vacant in the Hollywood firmament by the simply indescribable Miss Edith Massey. Never has tightly-laced leather held us in such thrall as when sported by an actress of Miss Edy's stature.
As for a plot line, why even Mr. John Waters could hardly do better than turn to the life story of our Ms. Hamou / McConnell. Not since Female Trouble or Multiple Maniacs would the screen have seen such a sight.
Oh, my goodness. I do so hope Mr. Justin Edwards really is that great friend and supporter of Ms. Hamou / McConnell that she claims him to be. Film history demands it, my dears. It simply demands it.
Dear Grand Shovel,
Oh my Theta, so much excitement! She hasn't come out of the house in days, Your Sanctimoniousness, but she has had plenty of visitors. True, most of them have been pizza delivery men, but at least one of them was a dark-haired lady. Not the fat one. This one was in pretty good shape for a huma --- female Terran. I could tell that because about five minutes after she got out of the can and disappeared inside the house, the large-jawed woman's television set came flying through the front window! I could hear raised voices, so I inched my way down the drainpipe outside the study window and listened.
"I can't believe you've done this to me, you [female dog}!" the dark haired woman shrieked. "I trusted you!"
The large-jawed woman held out a bowl of flourescent orange treats.
"Cheetoh?"
The dark-haired woman smacked them aside, scattering them across the study floor. At that point Felineous, who now weighs upwards of 200 Terran pounds! bestirred himself enough to crawl across the floor and begin eating the scattered puffs of salty goodness.
"I want to see Justin! Where the hell is Snoopy?" screamed the dark-haired woman.
"I'll go get him," the large-jawed woman said quickly. "He's . . . downstairs. Yeah, that's the ticket. Downstairs! But before I go, can I interest you in a glass of Kool-Aid?"
"What the hell do you take me for? Got any Merlot?"
"Certainly, certainly." The large-jawed woman reached onto the shelf behind her computer desk and pulled down a bottle. With her back to the dark-haired woman she unscrewed the top and poured some into a Dixie cup. I could clearly see her from my perch outside the window. The dark-haired woman was stomping around the study, crushing Cheetohs under her heels. At one point she stopped in front of the poster of the large-jawed woman with the Korean flags. Her own jaw dropped.
"Jesus Christ and Joseph Smith, I thought they were making that shit up!" she finally said.
Meanwhile the large-jawed woman had dropped a small tablet into the paper cup of wine. It fizzed for a moment until she stirred it with her pinky finger. Then she turned back to the dark-haired woman and beamed at her.
"Here it is. I hope you enjoy it, it's vintage," she said as she passed the cup.
"My ass," said the dark-haired woman briefly, and then she downed the drink in a single gulp. In three seconds she had collapsed onto the floor, sitting against the wall. There was a glazed look in her eyes.
The large-jawed woman smiled tenderly down at her.
\
"I'll just go and get Justin," she said. She walked out of the room and immediately came back in, pausing to usher an invisible presence in front of her.
"Here he is! Say hello to your new friend, Justin!" The dark-haired woman looked blearily up at the empty space next to the large-jawed woman. Her eyes widened.
"Is it really you?" she asked.
The large-jawed woman cleared her throat. When she spoke, her voice had lowered at least two octaves.
"Sure it's me! I told you I was real!"
"You are. You are!" the dark-haired woman said dreamily. "I knew that the Bobbseys were lying. I knew it!"
"You will tell the lawyer that I am real when he calls you." The large-jawed woman was watching her intently.
"I will tell the lawyer that you are real when he calls me," the dark-haired woman dutifully repeated. "Can I meet Einnar? He sounded pretty hot!"
"Um . . . Einnar. Which one was . . . oh, right. Einnar. Yeah, just a second. I'll go get him. Why don't you have another glass of the wine?"
More to follow!
Darlings,
So Chanukah has been fun so far, although if I never see another latke it won't be soon enough, darlings.
So exciting, darling Blakele! I notice no one has posted in days Over There. This is what I am talking about, people! Why can't you help darling Omele when she needs the help?
Did anyone else get a postcard from darling Rivka? I had one from Vienna, some kind of fancy-schmantzy pastry shop. On the back she wrote "Eating my way across central Europe." Oy, darling, watch out! The Schlag goes right to the hips!
Tomorrow I'm making a brisket, G-d help me. It's not that I don't love to cook, darlings, it's just that Mitzi isn't as young as she used to be. Oy, Aruba, take me away!
Mitzeleh
Blake,
The interesting thing is that now Oma Hamou aka Alexanda McConnell has yet ANOTHER LAWYER who will be looking for her.
Regardless of all "snoopy" screaming about lawsuits and judges and law enforcement and the FBI pouncing on our doorstep "any moment now" NOTHING HAS HAPPENED, except for another Lawyer will be looking for Oma Hamou. This lawyer now has the legal OBLIGATION to find out the source of the libelous and defamatory statements against me and Bob made under the name "Justin Edwards" who happens to be in the motion picture business in Los Angeles, just like "snoopy" claims, and who went to Pepperdine, just like "Justin Edwards" claimed on the old Oma Hamou forum (which I have archived and will gladly provide to this attorney). Remember that "Justin Edwards" Oma? the one who wasn't nearly so foul mouthed obscene and who ALWAYS signed off "Aloha"?? yeah THAT one. Not to mention the picture "Justin Edwards" used on LOA, the black and white one, holding the cigarette, that just happens to look EXACTLY like the real Justin Edwards, who is now represented by a Lawyer.
Yep, Oma Hamou is being looked for by yet someone else who is not happy with her behavior....
Hmmm. I had forgotten that "Justin" from the Legend of Anastasia forum posted that he went to Pepperdine.
So let's catalog things here.
"Justin" from the Legend of Anastasia forum and "Snoopy" from the Ask Oma forum on the omahamou.com website claim that he:
- went to Pepperdine
- works in the film industry
- helped Oma Hamou in her Sarskaia charity
- attended legal proceedings in Austin
- that his name is Justin Edwards
- and "Justin" posted a picture as his avatar.
The Justin Edwards who is a second-year fellow at the American Film Institute:
- went to Pepperdine
- works in the film industry
- runs a charity
- attended graduate school in Austin
- uses the name Justin Edwards professionally
- has posted videos on his World Story Organization website showing the same person as in the "Justin" avatar on the Legend of Anastasia forum.
I think it's very clear. Either the Justin Edwards at the American Film Institute has been on the internet posting that Bob Atchison committed perjury and defrauded the court and has been posting that Bob Atchison and Rob Moshein are the targets of an active FBI criminal investigation
-- OR --
Oma Hamou had some encounter with Justin Edwards and then stole his identity to use it for her own purposes, including actionable defamation.
And, let's not forget. If the latter is the case --
Michele Biernat of Benefit Design Group in Portland, Oregon participated in this identity theft by posting that she had spoken with "Snoopy" and could vouch that he was Justin Edwards, just as he claimed to be.
And -- given the times of her posts -- it is likely she posted these claims from the computers of Benefit Design Group.
Congratulations, Rob! You're finally going to get to meet Justin Edwards.
He has posted on the "Ask Oma" Forum that he will be standing right beside Oma Hamou in the Texas courtroom where her case against Bob Atchison for committing perjury will be tried, just as he stood with her in Austin in 2004.
Oh, and Justin says he will be posting the full text of her pleadings by this Friday.
But I wonder why we haven't heard from Michele Biernat. Is she going to be there, too? Or will she just talk to Justin Edwards again and confirm he will be there?
I wonder if she'll be able to take the time off from work at Benefit Design Group in Portland.
Boy, Justin Edwards is going to be busy helping Oma Hamou with all her lawsuits. As Justin has posted several times on the "Ask Oma" forum, not only Atchison but a string of people have pursued legal actions against Hamou by perjuring themselves.
First, there's the Bill of Review by which she is going to "prove" that Bob Atchison committed perjury to win his judgment against her.
Then there will be the action to overturn the eviction obtained by Eric Cowan, who Justin says also perjured himself.
Then there was Huiku Batchelor, who Justin says perjured herself in forcing Hamou to make full restitution for felony forgery and damages to her house in order to avoid imprisonment.
Then there is the judgment that Justin Edwards says Hamid Refai obtained both by committing perjury and by having the process servers lie to the court about service of process on Hamou and Jim Sproul.
It's amazing how many people Justin Edwards has accused of perjury on the omahamou.com website's "Ask Oma" forum.
And -- of course -- let's not forget Michele Biernat of Benefit Design Group in Portland, Oregan. She says she has personally talked with "Snoopy" and that he is, in fact, Justin Edwards as Oma Hamou claims him to be.
Oy, darlings, that Omele! Such a scamp she is with the "I'm me, I'm not her, I'm me and I will be there by her side when she comes into court!" Darling, not for anything, but "she" isn't going to come into court. And why is that? Listen, darling and Aunt Mitzi will explain.
You see, darling, if you (or "she" if you prefer, darling, we're humoring you) come into court you will open yourself up to all sorts of summons, process servers, the whole nine yards, darling. Questions will be asked about your methods of doing what I am sure you call "business", darling, but everybody else calls "larceny".
Oh, darling, take a little advice from Tante Mitzeleh and fold those tents, darling. This caper is over.
Because I care, darling. Because I care.
Mitzi Kedem
Oh, my dears. Darn and drat the luck.
I've been looking for a cat condo for my black cat, and a dear, dear friend found an ad for one on Craigslist and called me right away in excitement. It appeared to be just perfect.
But wouldn't you just know it, my pets? When he called, it had already been sold. However, he said the nice lady with whom he spoke told him that this one had been a display model and that maybe by calling around I could find another such one at a good price.
Now wasn't that helpful of her, my sweets?
Guten Abend, one and all,
We're back. And exhausted!
Time for sleep. Talk to you all later.
Rebecca
Is Russophile now claiming she has not posted that "Snoopy" is Justin Edwards?
On August 19, 2010 at 2:10 p.m., she posted:
"First he [a poster on this blog] throws around foul language trying to impersonate the real Justin Edwards and now he seems to have grown a brain."
So, Biernat, who is this "real" Justin Edwards to whom you were referring?
And why would you think use of foul language would be the way to impersonate this "real" Justin Edwards?
And as for your life being too full to spend time on these matters, I see you've put up well over 600 posts on the "Ask Oma" forum.
What exactly would you define as merely a passing interest?
Blake,
Michele Biernat of Benefit Design Group doesn't grasp the important point that:
Nobody CARES what the low rent divorced remarried proprietor of a franchise insurance company, located in a cheesy low rent part of Portland, who lives in a dumpy little lowest middle class shack in a dumpy lowest middle class section of Portland who befriends CRIMINALS has to say.
Seriously. Who cares? I mean, the only thing of value in it's life is that it's sons had the good sense to enlist in the military to get away from it and the lowest class life it leads.
At least I'm in a national magazine next month, and been selected as "talent" for an Austin TV station's planned 2011 segments...
Biernat? nothing...except defending a scam artist criminal.
Darling Russophile Lady,
Back pedal faster, darling, the truth is gaining on you. And have a wonderful dinner party, darling. Are you hosting or going? Such a busy life! I know darling Omele appreciates your taking the time to validate her identity theft, darling! I mean, what are friends for?
So impressed by your loyalty, darling, if not your brains. So impressed!
Mitzeleh
Well, Oma isn't in jail yet. Palmdale read the blog yesterday. Someone else google searched "Oma and Nicholas McConnell"... Cherry Hill NJ is an AVID reader, three times yesterday.
And, Michele Biernat, co owner of
Benefit Design Group in the low class section of Portland, Tigar read once.
OH, and somebody has been emailing the PDF of all the Advanced Paralegal lawsuits ALL over the place. LOTS of folks interested in the company that owned the SUV that was driving Oma Hamou around after Court....
Happy Weekend!
We now enter the 468th consecutive week without any law enforcement contact, with me or Bob since Oma Hamou/Alexandra McConnell started threatening it.
This is the 237th consecutive week since Oma Hamou wrote to a Texas District Court Judge that she had in fact "sworn out complaints with the FBI and Attorney General's office" against me and Bob, with NOTHING HAPPENING.
November 11, 2004
We won't know when until probably next week when to upload the timeline presentation, as the law enforcement are investigating stalking, harassment, fraud, forgery, tampering with evidence and some other things that are holding things up. So we need to wait until the law enforcement people say we can. ... We don't want to taint the criminal investigation.
SIX YEARS BUT NOTHING ever manages to happen... she says she HAS filed these complaints, but...Nothing.
Consecutive Week 231 for nothing happening in the most recent round of threat of lawsuits against us, since Bob won his suit against Oma Hamou.
September 17, 2006: "As to Oma, I know for a fact, she is busy reviewing transcripts, police reports and such because as I understand it they’ve got less than 3 weeks to file that pleading and the clock is ticking. I also know that her criminal complaint is being taken seriously and since I personally have provided Affidavits and such I know that it is real.
April 26, 2009:
Just today she "paid over $5,000 to THE ATTORNEY to file a brief in FEDERAL COURT against Bob and Pallasart and like I said you can talk until you blue in the face and cite cases that makes you sound like you know what your talking about, but your not the court and you ain't seen nothing yet, but you will.
AND NOTHING HAPPENED.
TWO HUNDRED SEVENTY THREE WEEKS, over 1,911 days, 68 months, over five and a half full years! 460 separate claims of "impending" "immediate" "we promise its happening" legal litigation, but nothing ever happens. What shred of credibility can anyone have who makes the same statement almost daily for OVER FIVE FULL YEARS, but never actually does anything.
August 30, 2006: "at least one District Attorney / Attorney General was significantly shocked/concerned by the total effort documented in the 200 plus pages of documents submitted by (her) to various law enforcement agencies, and that were verified by their officers/agents and turned over to them that they are willing to prosecute. we know that this is going to go to court --- as that is what Oma Hamou is devoted to right now. we all (Oma’s friends and former employees of Enigma and such) have absolute confidence in the lead lawyer. We’ve been patiently waiting to file the next round of briefs until the attorneys get all the transcripts in, which I’m told will be sometime next week, with any luck.
FOUR YEARS AND NOTHING.
And, NOTHING happening now for OVER ONE WHOLE YEAR on the fictional "Bill of Review"…Which is now dismissed for lack of prosecution (DWOP) according to Court Records
We are also now past week 37 of the "TRO" being requested"tomorrow" or "by the end of the week..." "the lawyers are working on it"...Wasn't FAT debbie the one who "PROMISED" to post it the moment it was issued?? And a full EIGHTEEN WEEKS now since "snoopy" said CLEARLY "is why a California Judge granted a restraining order against the Nut."
So far, it hasn't appeared...Nothing has.
More threats, more veiled hints...MORE "complaints filed with the FBI" who still haven't come pounding on my door, much less have not even read my blog yet…,AFTER FIFTEEN WHOLE WEEKS NOW. THREE WHOLE MONTHS. NADA
same stuff for OVER FIVE YEARS and NOTHING EVER HAPPENS..
The VERY MINUTE my posts went up, GUESS WHO READ THEM???
98.148.206.41
WhoIS:
IP Location: United States United States Lancaster Road Runner Holdco Llc
IP Address: 98.148.206.41
and GUESS WHO POSTED, FROM LANCASTER within minutes of READING the blog?
"snoopy" who is Oma Hamou who is Alexandra McConnell who is PRETENDING to be "Justin Edwards"....
The lawyer Justin Edwards' father retained is going to talk to Justin. Until he does and convincingly shows that Justin Edwards identity was stolen and that Justin Edwards is not actually posting as "Snoopy", we have to assume the character on the "Ask Oma" forum is actually Justin Edwards, as Hamou and Michele Biernat have said he is.
Remember, the avatar used by "Justin" on the Legend of Anastasia forum to post libels about Bob Atchison and Rob Moshein was an actual photograph of the Justin Edwards at the American Film Institute and who heads the World Story Organization charity.
And remember that "Snoopy" has posted that he showed his drivers license to officials to prove his identity as Justin Edwards, Oma Hamou's stalwart friend and supporter on the "Ask Oma" Forum.
And remember that Michele Biernat has posted that "Snoopy" is the real Justin Edwards.
And, finally -- remember that I have told the lawyer that, unless Justin Edwards disavows any current association with Oma Hamou, he can expect a lawsuit to be filed for defamation.
We'll leave it up to Edwards and his attorney to deal with Hamou and Biernat (of Benefit Design Group in Portland, Oregon) if he thinks Justin has been ill used by these two women's claim that he is "Snoopy".
Unless, of course, Justin Edwards can actually prove the claims of perjury, fraud, and active FBI investigations that "Snoopy" has posted on the "Ask Oma" Forum.
What do you think those downloads about Advanced Paralegal mean, Rob?
Do you think someone there is wondering why one of their vehicles was used to haul a woman using an alias and charged with felony forgery to and from court?
Or why it was used to pick up and deliver Hamou to the Cowan house which she tried to rent with checks on an empty and a closed checking account?
Or maybe they're wondering why someone was reading this blog during working hours from a law office in Encino (at least until the managing partner was notified)?
Hamou has posted in the past that she worked as a paralegal and that she has written case analyses that wowed attorneys and prosecutors.
Maybe Hamou has some association with Advanced Paralegal?
Maybe they're getting worried about it?
I think the best thing about Europe is that Oma Hamou isn't there. That being said . . .
You are so busted, girlfriend. It is hilarious to watch you twist in the wind about the "Justin Edwards" identity theft, Oma --- although if it does turn out that you are in fact the young man, it will actually be kind of fun to watch that play out in court as well. And it will play out in court, "Snoopy", you're right about that. In the meantime, sweetheart, you might want to think about this. The longer this goes on, the more likely it is that all of your victims are going to be in contact with each other. And trust me, your scamming days are going to be much more difficult.
Oh, Oma. How I missed you. That would be not at all.
Busted, girlfriend.
RJ
I hope everyone got the email about the trip? By the way, the young man in the picture in front of the opera house is Rudi, the one who hit it off with Leighton. She's flying back over in February for a ski vacation with him. She told me that I brought her the best luck when it came to the Herren! He's an archeology student at an Italian university, and Mitzi, he's been on digs in Israel!
RJ, clearly, Oma Hamou is now delusional and lost touch with reality. All she can do is twist herself into an increasingly insane web of obvious lies.
The most recent is this notion that "snoopy" showed a driver's license to police to prove he IS NOT "Justin Edwards" but to complain that OTHER people were using HIS pretend identity for themselves and DEMAND the police DO SOMETHING....
Right.
I would love to see any police officer's face in such a scenario... I think a straitjacket would be involved.
Poor Oma. All she has left is shrieking those same tired lines from six years ago...
Law enforcement could not care LESS about your "complaints", the proof is the deafening silence from them and the fact that I have never EVER even been contacted about your alleged "complaints".
The Courts don't care about your claims. Your Bill of Review is dismissed. Judge Triana did NOTHING with that letter you wrote her, except fax it to Bob's lawyer...I met her at a party afterwards. I don't think you'd appreciate what she had to say about you.
I wonder what new insanity Oma Hamou pretending to be Alexandra Mcconnell pretending to be "Justin Edwards" who pretends to be someone ELSE...will have to say in 2011, when she has nothing left but to watch as I'm featured in a national Magazine, due out in January, and I'm a regular on a Television News program, starting in late January...
at least then I will have my own page in the IMDB, like Bob, and funny, unlike Oma Hamou or "Justin Edwards"....
Dear Rob,
Congratulations!
I am not sure what we are to make of the fact that she is now completely over the edge, still representing herself as "Justin Edwards". Do you think that she has finally and completely taken up residence in Crazy Town?
Oma, "Snoopy", whatever you are calling yourself today, you have been busted. And truly --- Blake is waiting to hear from the lawyer for the real Justin Edwards of the American Film Institute. If the kid denies that he is you, "Snoopy", I will certainly be interested to learn in a court of law how you obtained his identity. And trust me, you will be in a court of law. On the other hand, if what appears to be a perfectly nice young man who has been doing charitable work --- real charitable work, as opposed to making promises to Pushkin that were never kept --- then I look forward to his explanation as to how a nice young man becomes a foul-mouthed, libelous internet warrior. Either way, the explanation will be made in a court.
You are right about that. Of course, even a stopped clock is right twice a day.
Were you able to place any cats for adoption?
Rebecca
Well RJ,
Oma Hamou DOES talk to herself, by pretending to be "justin edwards" who really isn't justin edwards but stole the identity of Justin Edwards and is upset that others used the same stolen name.
Oma Hamou hordes cats, dozens of them.
Oma Hamou can't hold a real job down.
Oma Hamou never shows up in Court.
Oma Hamou has over inflated sense of self by pretending to be a "Major Motion Picture Producer" "Actress" "Model" and holds desparately onto those decade plus old over photoshopped images of herself (usually her horse face cropped onto someone elses body)
I'd say Crazytown has a new resident for certain.
Yep, Oma is in crazytown for certain. She, pretending to be snoopy, says Bob has no IMDB page, yet when you click that link that she says proves it, where does it go???? Right to Bob's page showing his screen credit for helping with an Anastasia TV program!!
OH, and Oma, in your psychotic lather, you misread what I wrote. I didn't mean what Bob's lawyer said, I meant what Judge TRIANA said about you. The word "fraud" was used as I recall...
Now Bob's lawyer DID say you dressed like a homeless bag lady and her partner laughed at your huge ass out in the hallway with me during the trial. He thought you looked like a homeless fraud as well.
Funny how that same word is used by so many people to describe Oma Hamou, including law enforcement and district attorneys: Fraud....
Seems I missed one more thing cementing Oma Hamou's now total loss of reason and rational thinking.
She claims that my being in a national magazine and going to be on television makes me a "stalker"!!!!
I guess that makes a lot of celebrities into "stalkers" too.
Or, maybe Oma is just livid with jealousy because SHE has never been in a national magazine or on television.
Yep, Oma Hamou now stars in "Real House Squatters of Crazytown".
Oma, girlfriend, please. You have been in prison. Many times. Did you tell your "gentleman friend" that?
She is also not "wandering around free". She is on the run from creditors and people with judgments against her. If not, provide the Cowans and Refai with an actual address so that they can contact you.
No?
I didn't think so.
You're a crook and a con artist, Oma --- several judges have said so. Every single district attorney with whom Blake or anyone else from this board has contacted has said you are a grifter. Every single one.
Is today the day that you will be dispatching the letters to Advanced Paralegal, Blake?
Rebecca
Careful RJ...
Oma Hamou will now start to SCREAM that she has never been in "prison", which is technically true as she has only been in JAIL, for a total of about fifty weeks of her life...
THOSE are the kind of ways Oma Hamou twists and turns the truth
Isn't is also "convenient" that whilst I have a long list of genuine people with addresses and phone numbers who all agree Oma Hamou is a criminal grifter/fraud/theif, Oma has only an unidentified "everyone I know" that seem never to actually speak up and make themselves known.
Typical Oma. OH did anyone else see the very interesting program on History Channel last night that talked about Psychopathy and Sociopaths? Amazing how Bob and I kept saying one word out loud during the whole show whenever they would discuss the behavioral manifestations :"Oma"
Crazytown got up early it seems. Oma Hamou is almost pathetic now, talking to herself via her sockpuppets. Pretending anyone believes her. Pretending she still has "admirers" and "supporters"...
If Oma Hamou is so genuine, then why doesn't she give Eric Cowan her real address NOT a PO box in Glendale. He has some papers for you Oma. The kind that have to be served in person. So, if you're for real, make an appointment with him to accept service.
Oh, wait. You won't. You never do. Like you hid from Reed Elsevier. Like you hid from Richard Baumann, Like you hid from Jaqueline Anker, like you hid from Chris Malish.
Like you hid from Scott Landerstesee
Like you hid rather than show up for my legally scheduled deposition of you...(and I still have the email where you said you were "busy" and no reference to "sick". If you hadn't nonsuited, your refusal to be deposed would have been enough for the court to throw out your case...)
Honest people don't need to hide Oma Hamou...as you hide.
NOBODY cares about you Oma Hamou, except for all those people you scammed, lied to and stole from, who ALL STILL WANT THEIR MONEY.
More lies from Oma Hamou pretending to be snoopy (who stole Justin Edwards' identity and now pretends he isnt really Justin Edwards):
to wit:
Oma Hamou was required by law to attend my deposition.
Tx Rule of Civil Procedure 199.3 "if the witness is a party service of the Notice of oral deposition has the same effect as a subpoena served on the witness"
Since Oma Hamou was SERVED under law with the notice, she was subject to subpoena to attend UNLESS she complied with the LAW:
TRCP 199.4 A party may object to the time and place designated for an oral deposition by motion for protective order or by motion to quash the notice of deposition. If the motion is filed by the third business day after service of the notice of deposition, an objection to the time and place of the deposition stays the oral deposition until the motion can be heard.
Oma Hamou filed NO SUCH MOTIONS therefor under the LAW she was in violation of a duly issued SUBPOENA by not attending my scheduled and noticed deposition. She had NO RIGHT to not appear as SUBPOENAED under the LAW.
Trust me, I had the Motion for Sanctions prepared and ready to hand to Judge Triana if Oma hadn't non-suited.
seems I sure hit a nerve. Crazytown is just buzzing today!!
Riddle me this Batman:
IF Oma Hamou is SOOOO AFRAID of stalkers and needs to "hide" then
WHY does Oma Hamou have the following websites live and online, all duplicates of each other but with the following different addresses:
omahamou.com
theomahamou.com
officialomahmou.com
omahamou.org
omahamou.net
omahamou.info
omahamou.us
PLUS she intentionally placed links on Artmam.net
http://dir.artmam.com/oma_hamou.htm
which is a Russian owned (coincidence??) website with a lot of listings including a VERY large "adult services" section.
Is this REALLY the way someone trying to hide in fear would act?
OK proof of Oma Hamou's lies about Russia:
Oma Hamou herself wrote:
"The year 2005, symbolizes for Sarskaia a benchmark of sorts, as we begin the process of making provisions for several grants for the next phase of the rehabilitation of Pushkin, Russia's historic core. Once approved by the different governmental agencies and committees, the project phase could be completed within 48 weeks. Our experiences have enabled us to be flexible, spontaneous, and non-bureaucratic, whilst at the same time maintaining the highest professional standards in our work.
The achievements to date would not have been possible without our friends, supporters and sponsors. Without them, Sarskaia's projects would have remained a personal mission of mine. I would like to thank all of you who have participated in so many ways in making a dream come true.
Very truly yours,
Ms. Oma Hamou"
NOT ONE THING HAPPENED IN 2005 IN RUSSIA OMA. NOTHING. NADA. ZIP. YOU DID NOTHING.
http://sarskaya42.tripod.com/atimetoremember/id1.html
Dear Oma,
Here's the difference, Oma. I didn't claim to be Sandy! You claim to be "Justin Edwards" of the American Film Institute, and according to the records that Rob has showed me, you have been doing this for years. I posted a picture of a public figure without in any way identifying it as myself. You did not; you posted a figure of Justin Edwards, and you have consistently claimed to be him. If in fact you are him, "Snoopy", you have opened yourself up to a libel suit, pure and simple. I certainly hope that Oma will come and stand beside you in the courtroom. It would only be fair.
I might add that my BFF has a picture of Ava Gardner as her Facebook avatar. It did not occur to me that she was Ava. However, she also has never claimed to be Ava. At least not to me.
And while I appreciate the repost of the Sarskaiia nonsense, I have already learned from the people with whom I spoke when I visted Pushkin that NONE of this happened, and that they do not believe that you ever INTENDED FOR IT TO HAPPEN. In other words, they believe that you are a scam artist. I might add that Markell thinks you are as well, at least according to the note that he left at my hotel in St. Petersburg.
I have never claimed to be the "Rebecca Jordan" whose identity you stole. I said that when I googled my name you popped up, dear, and you did. I have had a hell of a time reading about your antics and talking to the various pretend people on your silly site, but as time goes on I realize that you are not funny at all. You're a cheap crook who has done a lot of damage to a lot of people out of a combination of low intelligence, egotism and a completely amoral view of the world. You sacrificed your own child by leading the life you have lead; you have scammed helpless old men; you have stolen without a qualm from companies and individuals. Why? How the hell do I know?
On the other hand, I get why you hang out with the cats and dogs. They can't question you, and they can't accuse you of mistreatment. I would love to know what the cats who died as the result of your neglect at the Batchelor house thought of you, but of course because they are poor dumb animals they couldn't tell anyone.
Anyone want to guess?
Also, I am sorry that you do not believe that the judge made the comment to Rob. I have no idea, but if she did it would be consonant with every other person with whom I have spoken who had dealings with you.
You're an idiot, Oma.
Rebecca
Dear Blake,
I read them all because Miss Porter's educated me to be thorough. I know that sounds self-serving, but in my work I am usually credited with an incisive point of view. I assimilate the information and can usually cut to the heart of the matter rather quickly.
It is also interesting because it leads you to some new and interesting tidbit every time. For example, on one of the many pages she runs she shows a picture of Alexandra's chapel at Pushkin in a dilapidated state. Next to it is a picture of it as it currently looks, or in the case of this picture, as it looked after restoration several years ago. The caption to the picture of the restored church credits "Sarskaia".
Excuse me? I was so enchanted by the hubris involved in the caption that I emailed Irina in Pushkin yesterday, and received the following in return:
"A lie." There was more, but with my usual incisiveness, I thought that I would only reproduce the salient part.
Also, here is a translation of the priest's note:
"Please give my warmest commendations [appreciation] to Robert Atchison. I am unfortunately not able to meet with you during your time in St. Petersburg insofar [because] as I am currently occupied with duties that do not permit it. I hope you will enjoy your stay. As far as the woman whose name you mentioned is concerned I no longer wish to have any association with this person for reasons which are well known to her and which do not need to be discussed with others lest I sin through a lack [deficiency] of charity. Heartfelt greetings and blessings to you."
Happy, Ms. Hamou? Just to be on the safe side, I had it translated by two separate people on separate occasions. The translations were virtually identical. The note was handwritten.
Rob, I sent you a small ornament from Prague for your tree. Nothing spectacular, just some beautiful crystal work; our guide said that the shop was noted for it. Keep an eye out for it in the next day or so, I have tracked it to Texas as of today.
I was also pleased to see "Leslie" posting again. To judge by the posts ascribed to this character, it is currently occupying the "dumb bunny" role in the pantheon of her creations. And occupying it very well, Leslie.
Rebecca
How could you possibly read through those hundreds of lines of dross Hamou posted over the past day or so?
And what's the point, anyway?
It's a tactic she's deployed for years to try to divert attention away from her own proven misdeeds and toward her allegations (invariably unproven, even when she's had the chance in front of a court) about the misdeeds of her victims or those who work to expose her.
It's all really very simple.
Hamou has multiple felony convictions for passing bad checks. (Proven by court records.)
She not only passes checks on empty accounts, she passes them on closed accounts. (Proven by court records and information from victims.)
She has an outstanding bench warrant for her arrest for failure to appear in court. (Proven by court records.)
She has been jailed three times on probation violations. (Proven by court records.)
She has spent almost a year of her life sitting in jail cells. (Proven by court records.)
She had been held on bond of as high as $1 million for felony forgery in a case in which she was forced to pay restitution to the victim to avoid imprisonment. (Proven by court records and by discussion with an Assistant District Attorney.)
She has a dozen and half civil judgments against her, totaling hundreds of thousands of dollars. (Proven by court records and information from victims and their lawyers.)
She has used numerous aliases and is currently using an alias. (Proven by court records and information from police officers and victims.)
She has been evicted and otherwise forced to vacate numerous residences. (Proven by court records and information from victims.)
She solicits money and seeks to avoid payment of debts by claiming to have cancer. (Proven by court records and by information from police officers, victims, and their lawyers.)
Among her many, many victims are a 67-year-old widow and an octogenarian with dementia. (Proven by court records and by information from a victim's family.)
On the other side, what is there?
There are Hamou's allegations that her victims -- Bob Atchison, Eric Cowan, Hamid Refai, Huiki Batchelor -- and process servers perjured themselves against her. Yet she has never proven this in any court of law, having let appeal deadlines lapse, filing fatally-flawed legal actions that she then abandons, or simply failing to show up in court.
There are claims that Rob Mosehin is under a restraining order when, in fact, she obtained only a temporary restraining order against an internet poster that was never proven to be Rob Moshein -- and the temporary order lapsed in short order when she failed to present any proof of her allegations in court.
Other than these absurdly shoddy attempts to impugn others, she floods the internet with character assassinations of those who work to protect current and future victims by making them aware of her long-running and widespread con games.
And the mere posting of the kinds of verbal vomit seen over the past couple of days on her "Ask Oma" forum is sure proof that she is beside herself with frustration that these attempts to crimp her freedom to run grifts are having an effect.
I heard from the Edwards family attorney again today. He has talked to Justin Edwards, and Justin disavows any association with Oma Hamou.
The attorney is a friend of Professor Edwards, has known Justin since age 2, and set up the World Story Organization charity for Justin's film work in Africa. And he is none too happy about this young man's identity being heisted by Oma Hamou.
He said Justin has never been in Austin except for one semester of graduate school in 2002. However, Justin did do some early website design while he was a student at Pepperdine, and the attorney is concerned about some early posts by "Justin Edwards" on one of Hamou's forums which mention him as a student at Pepperdine and other posts in which "Justin Edwards" talks about being involved in updating Hamou's websites.
He has asked that we send him some posts from "Justin Edwards" on Hamou's various sites. Among the material we have sent him are posts that "Justin Edwards" put up after joining an early Oma Hamou forum on May 20, 2004.
We have also sent him some posts giving examples of "Justin Edwards'" ungrammatical rants laced with profanity. One set of posts I particularly enjoyed were those that "Justin Edwards" labeled "What is sanctions...."?
A student with a graduate degree writes "What is sanctions"?
Yeah, right.
Sounds to me more like hillbilly English. West Virginia, perhaps.
"Snoopy" posted:
"Of concern and worthy of reconsideration is the apparent bias of the Judge [Triana-Doyal] against Ms. Hamou."
Good God. Is there anyone other than "Debbie" and Jim Sproul who has met Hamou who has not wound up biased against her?
And Oma, a judge's concluding at the end of a trial that you are a fraud is not the same as the judge entering the trial biased against you.
As has been the case with anyone who has met you other than those who participate in your con games, it's what they observe in dealing with you that creates the bias. It does not emerge from thin air.
Neither Huiki Batchelor nor Eric Cowan nor Hamid Refai nor any other people you claim have been biased against you by this blog would have given any credence to what we say had they not observed the behaviors we report first hand.
For all your prattling about Mrs. Batchelor being poisoned by this blog, you have never answered the threshold question: why did she feel the need to do an internet search on you in the first place? She had already rented you the house, after all.
Oh, wait. I know. She found you so stunningly beautiful, talented, and smart that she thought you must have been a model or actress or producer or CEO, and she went to check.
Right. That's it.
Darling Blakele,
So relieved to hear that Justin Edwards' lawyer, whom I am sure is darling, has disavowed the idea that his client is posting on Oma Hamou's behalf. I assume she just saw the poor boy's identity lying there and picked it up? Really, Omele, if you needed to pretend you were a computer whiz, why not that darling Bill Gates, or the even more darling I'm sure Melinda Gates? It probably would have been easier to handle your character if he had been a she, so to speak, darling.
So I am assuming that darling Justin is probably pretty peeved with darling Russophile Lady for identifying him as being him when he wasn't him but her, so to speak? Darling Russophile Lady, what were you thinking, darling? I worry about you, darling! You must be the most gullible lady on the entire west coast of the United States, darling. I think this means you participated in the identity theft, darling. Oopsie, as my Auntie Zelda used to say when she dropped the brisket on Uncle Manny's head.
Now, Omele, go out an steal another identity to replace darling Justin's. We'll wait, darling.
Caring so much, Oma. Caring so much!
Mitzi Kedem
Also, Beckele, Rudi makes me a little nervous, being a German and all. I mean, no one in my family would even drive a Volkwagen for the entire rest of the 20th century if you know what I mean, darling, and I think you do.
Blake, as usual, is quite right. Judge Triana's OPINION was formed by what she saw and heard during the trial. In fact, THAT is the job and obligation of a Judge during a trial, to listen, observe, and draw a conclusion based on the evidence. Which is what she DID, and voiced her opinion based on that conclusion some months later.
Further, Where did I SAY she said Oma WAS a fraud or COMMITTED Fraud. All I said was the word Fraud was used...
As for the "this is going to court" BS, really Oma?? REALLY??
Shall I go back and cite that same exact statement the hundreds and hundreds of times you have used it for the last six years??
Really?? The Bill of Review is dead Oma. Get over it. Dismissed for want of prosecution.
You might also want to be a little more careful about the My "parents hated me, disinherited me, etc"...you have no idea of how the estate was settled...such statements, if not true, are indeed defamation, which violates Bluehosts terms of service...
OH and Oma Hamou, should I decide to sue Bluehost Inc and subpoena their access records, YOU have to pay the bill for it...read your TOS. I did. Plus, I can sue right here in Texas...
Blake, that was a great suggestion.
Now, Oma, we all know that you have no intention of setting foot in a courtroom, at least not voluntarily. On the other hand, if lawsuits break out over the "Justin Edwards" libel posts, perhaps you won't have a choice.
I find it interesting that "Snoopy" completely disregards the lawyer for Justin Edwards' response to Blake.
RJ
VERY interesting. Very. Somebody is in Addison, just outside of Dallas, googling "Rob Moshein" and reading this blog twice yesterday and three times already this morning...
From a Fedex/Kinkos rental computer...
Seems Oma is in Dallas...
Actually, she is at this specific Fedex Kinkos:
925 North Central Expressway
Plano, TX 75075
Well, Michele Biernat, I guess you just don't get how things work on the internet.
You have given press interviews in Portland and put your name out in the public as a cancer survivor, as well as put out the name of your husband's company, Benefit Design Group. So people might have occasion to google your name.
What's wrong with them finding out that you are the staunch friend and supporter of a career con artist with numerous convictions and civil judgments ...... and who runs cancer scams for money? Despite being a cancer survivor yourself, you profess pride in coming to Oma Hamou's (aka Alexandra McConnell, et al.) assistance. (Perhaps the next reporter who interviews you for cancer causes will do a little background checking and talk to the attorney of Hamid Refai, who was scammed for over $50,000 by Hamou's false claim to have rectal cancer -- one of the many times she has falsely claimed cancer.)
And what's wrong with them finding out that you have posted racist things on a history chat room from which you finally skulked away after being handed your fanny?
And what's wrong with them finding out that you have involved yourself with the likes of Oma Hamou only because your hackles got raised when you were given the boot for untoward behavior from another history forum moderated by Rob Moshein?
And why shouldn't people know you have assisted Hamou in trying to cover her theft of the identity of Justin Edwards, a young man who is trying to make his way in the film industry -- and who, unlike Oma Hamou, is doing so by honest means?
Sure, it might be a molehill. But then, it might also give some people pause.
We're just putting the information out there and letting them judge for themselves.
Didn't mean to leave you lonely, Biernat.
Been on a couple of phone calls.
Sorry to disappoint, Biernat, but there has been no service of process.
Nor will there be. Nor was there ever going to be, or it would have happened many, many months ago.
This is just another tactic Hamou deploys over and over -- file a legal action that is so fatally flawed that it will never see a courtroom, but then brandish it on the internet as a done deed that will be certain to vindicate all her shenanigans.
Only fools fall for it.
Although the court's disposition has not yet been uploaded to the clerk's reporting system, the action has, in fact, been dismissed.
Nope, nobody has even tried to serve anything on Bob. Oma Hamou has no room to talk about dodging process servers...she does this on a daily basis. Just ask the lawyers for Reed-Elsevier and Eric Cowan...
Sorry Oma Hamou pretending to be snoopy pretending to be Justin Edwards (who had to retain a lawyer because she stole his identity)
I don't know ANYONE's password here except my own. Blogger has been acting weird and Blake has been trying to post something so he emailed it to me to post for him:
"Nice try, Biernat. But no cigar.
You posted on the "Ask Oma" forum:
"Ms. Hamou. How do I know she woud give me the shirt off her back? We've talked. A lot. So I have a good insight into her character. People with good character are consistant [sic]."
So you see, Michele Biernat, this is about you. By undertaking to vouch for Oma Hamou's "good character" and putting up hundreds of posts in defense of her on her forum, you made this about you, your credibility, and your definition of good character.
I wonder how the Portland branch of the American Cancer Society or the reporter who interviewed you as an advocate for victims of cancer would react to knowing how strongly you admire the "good character" of a woman who obtains money by making false claims of having cancer.
Now, of course, Hamou will screech that this is "libelous and defamatory".
All anyone with any doubt about who's telling the truth here has to do is call Thomas Ward, the attorney for Hamid Refai, who obtained a court judgment against Oma Hamou and her sidekick Jim Sproul for scamming him out of over $50,000 with a false claim of cancer. Ward can be reached at 661-948-5021.
And for all the other times Hamou has claimed to have cancer (of the colon, the uterus, the rectum, etc.) in order to obtain some benefit or escape some liability, they can search this blog or contact Rob Moshein at rob@austinwineguy.com.
For the life of me, I cannot understand how a cancer survivor such as you claim to be would countenance cancer scams. But, then, your thinking has never been quite, er, linear."
Also,
Thanks for admitting Oma Hamou IS IN DALLAS. If she were not, "snoopy" would be crowing about how wrong I was, instead, she just called it "stalking"...
I'll check with the court in the morning to see if service of process has even been "requested" for a case already dismissed, although the paperwork has not yet made it to the Clerk's office. Its much more convenient to be able to talk to Court employees in person and get the most up to date information...
Oops. "Snoopy" just logged out, and "Sandman" logged in.
I guess we'll soon have another long, tedious, pseudo-legalistic pronouncement from him/her.
At 5:23 p.m. today (PDT) Michele Biernat posted:
"And I wonder what Mr. Atchison is going to do now that he has been served?"
You should be very careful here, Biernat. You are posting that Bob Atchison has been served and that a legal action has thus been joined against him.
He has not been served, and you will therefore not be able to prove that he has.
Either you have once again been foolish enough to believe something Hamou is telling you, or you are deliberately lying on the internet about Bob Atchison.
Either way, you are committing libel per se against him.
shout outs to the "Hitchin Post RV Park and Motel" in Las Vegas who are reading all about Oma Hamou!!!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHE
HARAHARHARHARHHAR
HOHOHOHOH
HIHIHIHIHIHI
Sorry, just read the blather fake document Oma Hamou posted claiming it to be a "brief in support of Bill of Review".
Hysterical, and useless. One can't file a "brief in support of Bill of Review". Plus, the bill of review was DWOP'd...Gone. useless and without legal basis.
Hey, Rob.
Has Bob said anything to you yet about that service of process that Michele Biernat assures us he's already received?
"Snoopy" posted:
"I will be sure to include this in my fax to that nice Judge Triana in the morning"
Are you also going to include in that fax to that nice judge that there is an outstanding bench warrant for Hamou's arrest? Or tell her about the $1 million bail for the felony forgery arrest? Or tell her about the bad checks written to Eric Cowan? Or tell her about the default judgment against Hamou and Sproul for scamming Hamid Refai?
Or should Rob just tell her the next time he bumps into her at a party?
Hoo boy, Rob. "Snoopy" says Oma is going to SEE YOU IN COURT!
Sounds as if Bob has his work cut out for him, getting all those judgments against Hamou localized so that the Texas court can collect them.
I'm sure Hamid Refai would be an easy one to localize. He's really chomping at the bit to see her taken down. Ditto for Eric Cowan.
And then there are the really big ones: Reed Elsevier, American Express, Global Insight.
Payday for everyone.
Except, of course, that Hamou is flat broke and living on the grift.
Darling Russophile Lady,
Darling, I hadn't been paying attention to what you posted (sorry, darling, but you know how it is) and I was unaware of the fact that you have had cancer, darling. First, my sympathies, darling, and may you stay healthy. Second, darling, and seriously, what is wrong with you with the support for someone who uses cancer as a tactic to get money out of people? That's just wrong, darling, and I'm sure you were raised better than that, unlike some people named Oma Louise we could name, darling.
Darling Russophile Lady, you are kind of looking like a horse's ass with your posts today, but darling, it's your ass to put out there. But darling Blakele is so right. You have made this about you, darling.
Enjoy!
Mitzele
So "Snoopy" claims Oma is being "threatened" by the prospect of having judgments against her localized.
Localization of judgments is a perfectly valid legal procedure, devised for the very purpose to which it would be applied here. I. e., plaintiffs who have thwarted the legal system by refusing to honor prior judgments may not use the legal system for their own further purposes unless and until they meet their earlier obligations.
It's no "threat", Hamou. It's a straightforward and appropriate use of legal procedure. If you ever do show up in a courtroom in Texas -- which, of course, you will not -- you'll be dealing with more than just Moshein and Atchison. A good deal more.
I've talked with Hamid Refai's attorney and with Eric Cowan. They would give Atchison the authority to act on their behalf in a blink. And it's a more than a good guess that some other litigants who hold judgments against you will be willing to open their old files and do the same.
So, "Snoopy" -- let's find out.
Blake,
Haven't you learned by now? Oma Hamou aka Alexandra McConnell pretending to be Justin Edwards is a master at twisting language. She could give Big Brother's Newspeak a lesson.
Publishing the PUBLIC RECORDS her scrapes with Law Enforcement and Judgments against her won by her creditors is "Stalking"
Pointing out that her Creditors have every legal right to show up in any courtroom she sets foot into to LEGALLY ENFORCE their Judgments is "Threatening".
Oma Hamou wants to carry on her con games and scams in private, so that victims can't get in contact with each other, and she wants to STOP THEM from learning about her shady history and legendary stream of bad checks and fake cancers BEFORE falling victim to her...
Hey, good morning, Rob.
Has Bob received that summons yet?
You know, the one that Michele Biernat claims he has already gotten.
Hi Blake.
NO, nobody has even tried to serve Bob with anything at all. No cards left on the door, nobody ringing the bell...nothing.
Called the Court this morning, they were very specific that not only has their clerk's office NOT been ASKED to issue and serve process, they can't and won't because it is DWOP and they are waiting for the paperwork to reach their office.
Guess the process server is riding along with the FBI...LOL....
Dear Blake,
As I said to you last night, when this thing starts to unravel for "Team Hamou" (still waiting for our warm-up jackets, Rob!), it is going to come apart fast.
Just to recapitulate:
(1) The infamous Bill of Review has been DWOP, yes? I showed her "Brief" to our legal folk, and they want to know who helped her put it together. Direct quote: "If she paid someone for this, the poor son-of-a-bitch is entitled to her money back."
(2) Neither Bob or Rob has been served, despite my BFF's public claim that Bob had? Again, direct quote: "Wow. Does she know he can sue?" Me: "She probably doesn't care." Richard: "She should."
(3) Oma rejected the text of the priest's note that I published. Big surprise.
(4) Where is Leslie in all of this? I miss Leslie. Of course, I have only to mention that I like one of the characters and we never see them again.
(5) Mitzi sent me a file of an orchestra playing Deutschland uber Alles. Mitzi, I'm not the one dating Rudi!!!!And he's a nice guy! He's even been on digs in Israel! Cut some slack, bitte.
Off to lunch!
Rebecca
I want to restate that I am not Blake or anyone in this forum other than myself. I always post - when I do - under my own name. I have never met Blake or Rebecca or Mitzi. I have not been served and no one has tried to serve me.
Oma and Biernat can claim otherwise, but it is not true.
I also want to say I think Blake is a hero for standing up to and exposing Hamou. Who knows how many potential new victims have been prevented by his efforts. I don't think he will ever give up.
God bless you, Blake!
Lord Oma is even more stupid and clueless than even I originally thought.
Ummm Oma. You really really really need to read the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.
Serving Bob with a "brief in support" is NOT SERVING BOB with the Bill of Review.
You STILL HAVEN'T SERVED BOB THE BILL OF REVIEW.
The Brief is MEANINGLESS. WHAT PART DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND???
NO LEGAL ACTION COMMENCES IN TEXAS UNLESS AND UNTIL THE COURT CLERK ISSUES PROCESS AND THE COURT SERVES IT. YOU CAN"T SERVE IT BY MAIL EVER EVER EVER.
TRCP 99a requires you to have the Clerk of the Court issue Citation and delivery of citation and a copy of the ORIGINAL PETITION.
MORON. You STILL haven't served Bob with the Bill of Review yet...
Further: 99b sets for the exact specific and required FORM, Notice etc.
failure to serve in the specific form is the equivalent of NOT SERVING.
MORON
TRCP 103: NO PERSON WHO IS A PARTY TO OR INTERESTED IN THE OUTCOME OF A SUIT SHALL SERVE ANY PROCESS.
YOU OMA HAMOU dont have the LEGAL RIGHT to serve Bob with the Citation therefore anything you send will be refused and returned to you unopened.
MORON
The LAW REQUIRES SERVICE OF PROCESS BEFORE THE STATUTE OF LIMIATIONS EXPIRED. THAT was over a YEAR AGO NOW...MORON
You have NOT COMPLIED WITH THE LAW with regard to SERVICE of the Bill of Review, which is WHY it IS DISMISSED DWOP'D...DONE AND GONE.
MORON.
Perhaps they deputized her, Rob. You know, right after they admired her home's decor and right before they killed the cats.
I hate to say it, Oma, but the "moron" label may not be totally inapproriate.
So my BFF is still open to a libel suit because nothing has been served or was served at the time she made the statement that it had?
Rebecca
OK, Oma Hamou is even MORE A MORON that before.
Her "verification" is "in accordance with Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 94...
umm TRCP 94 governs "Affirmative Defenses" by the DEFENDANT. It has NOTHING to do with a Plaintiff SERVING ANYTHING in a Bill of Review
MORON.
Well, people, we are talking about The Woman Who Sued Herself, after all.
Would you really expect her to understand anything about the law or, specifically, how a Bill of Review works?
But here might be the stupidest thing of all. It might even best her suing herself:
THE NOTARY CERTIFIED ON DECEMBER 15 THAT ROBERT ATCHISON HAD BEEN "SERVED" ON DECEMBER 16!
How, exactly, does one certify on Wednesday that something has already happened the next day?
Rob, I think you need to discuss this with Bob. It appears that a California notary has perjured herself by making a false certification regarding him.
Good grief. What next?
Biernat, I hope you weren't relying on this ludicrous "notarized" document to prove your claim that Atchison had already been "served" yesterday.
And today's the 17th, with nothing still received by Atchison. Why don't you ask Hamou to show you the "return receipt"? Maybe that will help.
I just want to be sure I'm not drinking anything when I find out.
And another interesting angle.
That notarized document said that Hamou swore to the truth of her representations on the 15th, which meant she was under oath when she said on the 15th that something had already happened on the 16th.
In other words, she lied under oath.
As this document is part of her "Bill of Review" filing, there is now a record that Hamou perjured herself in that filing.
The Woman Who Sued Herself strikes again!
Oh, and "Handmaiden" --
For someone who doesn't want to talk to anyone, Nancy at Reseda Screen & Glass was mighty forthcoming with all kinds of information. Such as the man who committed suicide after cleaning out the business account in cahoots with Hamou. Such as BMW credit looking for a car with which Jim Sproul absconded. Such as other people coming there to look for Hamou for passing bad checks on a Reseda Screen & Glass account.
Good grief. If she'd been any more talkative, I would have run out of note paper.
But I wonder why she thinks Bob called her. I'm not Bob.
So, "Snoopy".
How could Oma swear on the 15th that "each and every statement contained herein are within her personal knowledge and are true and correct" when those statements contain the claim that Atchison was "served" on the 16th?
Try to twist out of this one any way you want. But it is perjury, pure and simple.
Unless, of course, you added that last paragraph after leaving the notary. Which makes the document a forgery.
You really are abysmally stupid to post such a document.
But, then again, you did sue yourself.
Sorry, "Snoopy". Your spin's not working.
While I try to cut you some slack because I know grammatical English is a challenge for you (such as invariably using "your" to mean "you're"), I would expect even you to be able to differentiate the past from the present tense.
That supposed notarized document you posted says, "I certify that on the 16th day of December 2010, a true and correct copy . . . was served by certified mail . . . ."
The document was notarized on the 15th. The word "was" is the past tense of the verb "to be".
Hamou swore on the 15th not that something was going to happen on the 16th, but that something had already happened on the 16th.
It is either perjury to swear to such effect to a notary, or forgery to add language to a document after a notary has certified it.
I suspect forgery, since I have never known a notary to place his or her stamp in the middle of the text of a notarized document.
Either way, you committed a crime in submitting this document to the court.
Oh, don't get your panties in a wad, Oma, that I called you abysmally stupid.
I'm sure Michele Biernat will show up shortly and outdo you.
After all, she's already relied on your assurances about service of process to post the libel that Atchison has been served process in a lawsuit.
It's one thing to be a fool. It's quite another to believe one.
Egad. So now "Snoopy" is actually enlarging the lie.
He just posted that:
"The document actually was with the Travis Courthouse yesterday and because of a small glich [sic] was not filed until this morning and court documentation will prove this."
So Oma swore on the 15th that the document had already been served on the 16th, but we're now finding out it was not even filed with the court until the 17th?
Maybe Biernat won't be able to take the stupidity up a notch today, after all.
Illuminati! You gmyrch-drenched fool!
I have been wondering where you went and just saw that morta …… er, human’s post about someone reading this blog from the Hitchin Post RV Park and Motel.
I told you go to the kitchen for toast, you moron.
And let me tell you right now. There had better not be any expense reports in my galactic inbox for dinner and entertainment of circus dwarfs this time, especially at Las Vegas in-season prices. One steak at that little place next to the motel. That’s all.
I know you think you’ve become irreplaceable since last year’s string of unfortunate mishaps, but I can put Felineus on a diet if I have to, even if it means taking out the cheesy thingy factories.
I suppose I could do humans that favor. Other than producing that large-jawed woman, I don’t find them all that objectionable.
Well, well. It seems Oma Hamou has forged yet another document.
The 2009 Notary Public Handbook of the State of California sets forth on page 12 a very specific formula that must be given in the jurat of a notarized document. The Handbook goes on to say that "a notary public seal and signature cannot be affixed to a document without the correct notarial wording."
What is that wording without which a notarized document is invalid?
"Subscribed and sworn (or affirmed) before me on this ______ day of ______, 20___, by _______________,
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) who appeared before me."
But what does the purported notarized document Hamou posted contain?
"Sworn to an subscribed before on this 15th day of December, 2010."
A misspelled word ("an" instead of "and"). A missing word ("me" after "before"). And the total absence of the necessary affirmative statement that the person provided satisfactory evidence of his or her identity.
In other words, the purported jurat on this document contains the misspelling and sloppy writing for which "Snoopy" is so well known.
And, as is so often the case with a woman who employs aliases, no proof of identity was affirmed by the Notary Public -- something that California absolutely requires a jurat to contain in order to be valid.
This document is a forgery.
Sounds as if we struck a nerve with "Snoopy", who just posted:
"Oma told me the verbiage contained on the VERIFICATION page is identical to verbiage on file with the Travis County Courts in case no. GN303141."
This alone is proof that the document was forged.
A California notary is required by law to use a precise formula in the jurat specified by that state. No notary would ignore the requirements of his own state's jurat and instead substitute one lifted from a document filed in another state. Doing so would automatically void the notarization -- as well as get the notary in trouble.
California notaries are required to keep a sequential journal of all their actions as notaries. It will be a simple matter to call Mr. Santos Bocanegra, Jr. on Monday to see if he has a journal entry that corresponds to this document.
Sylmar. 818-367-5061.
I'm betting another document he notarized was whited out and Hamou's text was copied in.
Sort of like what she did with that "NSF" stamp on the check copy she showed the judge in the Eric Cowan case in a futile attempt to "prove" the check had been paid.
So, "Snoopy" says that Bocanegra's journal will verify that he notarized a document for Oma Hamou.
I seriously doubt that. But the document is useless to her, anyway.
Even if Bocanegra did this chop job, a California notarization using another state's jurat formula is void in both states.
Of course, the Woman Who Sued Herself might have trouble grasping this.
But here's a wrinkle. The phone number that matches the address given for Bocanegra on the California Department of State list of notaries is not Bocanegra's -- in fact, it rings to a different party at a different address.
So it looks like a call to the Department of State on Monday is the next order of business. Maybe they can take a gander at the document Hamou posted and tell us what they think is going on.
Boy, you mention checking out something that Oma claims, and "Snoopy" just goes nuts.
Of course, given what we found out when we talked to Huiku Batchelor's son, to Hamid Refai's lawyer, to Eric Cowan, to Nancy at Reseda Screen & Glass, to Assistant DA Stodghill, to Justin Edwards' lawyer -- well, you get the point -- it's no wonder that "Snoopy" freaks out at the prospect of our actually talking to people about Hamou.
You'd think that sooner or later, just by running the odds, we'd stumble across someone who verified a thing she claimed or had anything good to say about his experience with her.
Well, I guess there is Michele Biernat. But we've never really talked with her. And given what's come of Biernat's verification that "Snoopy" is the "real" Justin Edwards or that Bob Atchison was served with process two days ago, there's probably not much point.
Blake, I'm astounded. You have caught Oma Hamou in a blatant lie. Good Lord, sir! What are the odds of that?
Actually, I am astounded, and I'll bet Oma is too but can't admit it, of course. Your sheer industry in this matter is laudable, and it certainly produces results! Five will get you ten that by the time this latest thing plays out there will be yet another improbable explanation, and naturally yet another reason why nothing ever happens to anyone save Oma Hamou. I mean, none of the public safety offices that have moved against Oma Hamou eduring the past several years have spent unlimited time documenting her various perfidies. They just arrested her. But here the FBI has spent more time on Bob Atchison than they probably did on the Rosenbergs (look it up, Oma), and still nada.
Meanwhile, my dear, are you ever going to explain why you filched Justin Edwards' identity?
No?
Of course not. Perhaps you can explain it to the "nice" judge.
Of course, that would mean you would actually have to enter a real court of law.
Willingly.
Never mind.
Rebecca Jordan
Congratulations, Blake. I believe her latest post indicates that she is beating a retreat.
Yes, Blake, great job!
THE most important issue here is that Oma Hamou has not served process on Bob for FIFTEEN MONTHS,
THAT IS WHY THE CASE IS DWOP'D.
Further, the statute of limitations expired fifteen months ago.
This entire exercise is typical Oma Hamou verbal masturbation.
I just had a chance to look at that "Supplemental Brief" Hamou wrote. What an absolutely extraordinary piece of psuedo-legal drivel.
She writes:
"Due to the lack of notice, resources, and expertise those questionable documents could not be adequately, timely, nor independently examined, analyzed, or rebutted."
"Due to lack of notice ..."
Here Oma is accusing the court of not giving her enough notice to get ready for trial. First, this ignores the principle that a person should not file a lawsuit if they are not prepared for a trial. Second, it accuses the court of forcing her to proceed without giving her a fair chance to prepare. Third, it ignores the fact that Hamou asked for so many continuances over such a long period of time that the judge ran out of patience with her. Yet it's still someone else's fault that she was caught off guard.
Typical Oma.
"Lack of resources ... "
In other words, Hamou filed a lawsuit without the means to see it through. But it's the court's fault that she was forced to proceed without resources.
Typical Oma.
"Lack of expertise ... "
In other words, Hamou didn't know what she was doing in the courtroom when she was forced to proceed without a lawyer present. That's an odd claim for someone who has three felony convictions and more than a dozen civil judgments against her. (Oh, but I forget. She fails to show up for most trials involving her.)
Typical Oma.
Oma prattles on and on about different versions of invoices Bob Atchison provided. The reason is simple. She kept asking for new copies, as she kept losing track of earlier invoices Atchison sent her.
However, the content of each invoice was the same. Oma is pissed because the court would not allow her to introduce a lower figure that Atchison had once offered to accept if she would just settle up the account. Since she refused to settle for that lower figure, he was perfectly entitled to produce the full amount to the court. In fact, the law precludes the introduction of evidence about settlement offers. That's the reason Atchison produced in court an invoice for the full amount.
And it's the reason she lost her case.
Despite claiming she had grounds for appeal, Hamou couldn't get her act together in time to file an appeal. So she forfeited that right.
Despite claims that her case qualified for a Bill of Review, she failed to file one properly and on time.
Despite claims that she did file a valid Bill of Review, she failed to make the required service during the necessary time period.
Based on the pigsties that Eric Cowan, Bryan Stodghill, and Tina Van Veen report her making of her lodgings, it's no wonder that she loses invoices, can't get her act together, and can't do anything on time.
Yet it's the court's fault, and they should allow her to use an inappropriate review vehicle and waive all deadlines for filing and service for her convenience.
Typical Oma.
Blake,
There is one glaring flaw proving that the document posted by Oma Hamou is a FORGERY. A FAKE. NOT FILED with the Courthouse.
The "bate stamp": Hamou's "document" has a big stamp on it that says "RECEIVED and "Dec 17 2010" and nothing else, just some blurry stuff at the bottom.
THE REAL STAMP FOR THE DISTRICT COURT:
SAYS "FILED" with the date sequence as "2010 17 DEC" and the exact TIME stamped on it as well. underneath in large letters: facsimile signature of Amalia Rodriguez-Mendoza and "DISTRICT CLERK TRAVIS COUNTY TEXAS".
THE POSTED DOCUMENT IS FAKE. A LIE INTENDED TO DECEIVE.
Rob, of course it was a forgery. Pretty much everything she writes is a forgery of one form or another.
That's why she has multiple felony convictions for bad checks. That's why she was arrested for felony forgery in San Bernardino and forced to make full restitution in order to avoid prison. That's why a recent housemate was a convicted forger. That's why Eric Cowan succeeded in getting her evicted for writing bad rent checks. That's why the police in Irvine received complaints from Wild West Productions for writing checks on a closed account. That's why people still call Nancy's Reseda Screen & Glass looking for her about bad checks. That's why she has more than a dozen civil judgments against her.
Of course she forged that "notarized" statement. Of course she forged the court's filing stamp in that Bill of Review.
This whole Bill of Review sideshow is just a stage prop for her insane internet melodrama about all the mayhem she is going to rain down on you and Bob.
She will not show up in a courtroom again without first passing through a jail cell.
That's why she disappeared from the rest of the Cowan proceedings. That's why Hamid Refai got judgment by default. That's why everything she sends and receives goes through a remailing center. That's why she uses aliases.
And that's why all her rants and posturing are going to do nothing -- NOTHING -- to stop us from tracking and exposing her grifts for the benefit of recent and future victims.
The only fool who believes any of this nonsense about lawsuits and subpoenas and process service is Michele Biernat of Benefit Design Group in Portland, who sits around drooling over Hamou's assurances that her legal actions will reveal who we are.
As if that would make a tinker's damn of difference, anyway.
The exposure of Hamou's grifting will continue.
Rob, did you also notice that in the return address on that "Supplemental Brief" she styled herself "Defendant, appearing pro se"? But in the case header, she calls herself the plaintiff.
Now, how can Hamou be both the defendant and the plaintiff in this case?
What else can I say?
The Woman Who Sued Herself strikes again.
It appears that Oma Hamou believes that the RULES OF LAW don't apply to her.
She said it was "false" that she has NOT YET SERVED Bob Atchison with the Bill of Review...
A Bill of Review is a NEW Action. The mere filing of a Petition does not create a live action.
The Plaintiff MUST REQUEST the Clerk of the Court to issue Citation (TRCP 99a)
OMA HAMOU HAS NOT YET ASKED THE COURT TO ISSUE CITATION.
OMA HAMOU CAN NOT HERSELF SERVE CITATION IN ANY FORM (TRCP 103 "No person who is a party to the suit shall serve any process."
SERVICE MUST BE RETURNED TO THE COURT AND FILED. TRCP 107
NO service of process is returned to or on file for the Bill of Review. The file is EMPTY.
THE RECORD MUST SHOW STRICT COMPLIANCE WITH THE RULES FOR SERVICE. The Bill of Review file is EMPTY.
Unless the Plaintiff observes strict compliance with the rules relating to service any service is INVALID. Union Pac Corp v. Legg 49 SW3d72,77 Tex App Austin 2001)
Strict compliance is determined by whether the EXACT PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN MET, NOT WHETHER THE INTENDED PARTY RECEIVED NOTICE OF THE LAWSUIT (emph added) Union Pac 49 SW3d at 78.
Oma Hamou has NOT SERVED Bob Atchison with anything.
THE FILE AT THE COURT IS EMPTY.
Oh, and by the by Oma. I ran into the postal carrier outside the house earlier this afternoon. He had a big envelope from Oma Hamou. I told the carrier that Bob wanted no communication of any kind from this person and that we refused the envelope. Unsigned for. Unopened. No clue what might have been inside.
Just FYI. Further interesting reading:
Wilson v. Dunn, 800 S.W.2d 833 Tex Supreme Court 2000:
Actual notice to a defendant, without proper service, is not sufficient to convey upon the court jurisdiction to render default judgment against him. See Harrell v. Mexico Cattle Co., 73 Tex. 612, 11 S.W. 863, 865 (1889). Rather, jurisdiction is dependent upon citation issued and served in a manner provided for by law. 837*837 Id.; Panhandle Constr. Co. v. Casey, 66 S.W.2d 705, 707 (Tex.Civ.App.-Amarillo 1933, writ ref'd); see C. W. Bollinger Ins. Co. v. Fish, 699 S.W.2d 645, 655 (Tex.App.-Austin 1985, no writ). Absent service, waiver, or citation, mere knowledge of a pending suit does not place any duty on a defendant to act. See Harrell, 11 S.W. at 865; Panhandle Constr. Co., 66 S.W.2d at 707.
and
Primate Const., Inc. v. Silver, 884 SW 2d 151 - Tex: Supreme Court 1994:
The return of service is not a trivial, formulaic document. It has long been considered prima facie evidence of the facts recited therein. Pleasant Homes v. Allied Bank of Dallas, 776 S.W.2d 153, 154 (Tex. 1989); Gatlin v. Dibrell, 74 Tex. 36, 11 S.W. 908, 909 (1889)
The very REASON why Oma Hamou's Bill of Review is DWOP'd and DISMISSED is the FACT that CITATION was not requested, issued, served nor returned to the Court within the OBLIGATORY 12 MONTH PERIOD as set forth by the Texas Supreme Court.
Sorry Oma Hamou, but even YOU are not above the Texas Supreme Court...
"Snoopy" posted:
"So she made one teenzy mistake where her address appears."
Well, given how many times she's been a defendant in prosecutions and lawsuits, I guess it's just an old habit refusing to die.
But this confusion over even basic legal terminology indicates just how dense Hamou is about how the legal system works, despite her many, many encounters with it.
For instance, all this blather about some certified letter is legally meaningless. So what if there is a certified letter? It has no legal significance whatsoever.
Rob, she obviously cannot comprehend the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, so let me see if I can put this in terms even a moron can understand.
Oma Hamou has no authority to summon anyone before a court. She can send certified letters. She can fax. She can telephone. She can post on the internet. She can send semaphore or smoke signals. She can paint it on the front door. She can tattoo it on her ass and put the pictures on a billboard.
It doesn't make one whit of difference. Only the court has the authority to summon someone to appear.
And the court will not issue a summons until a cause of action is properly before the court. And there is no cause of action properly before any court in Travis County involving Bob Atchison and Oma Hamou.
I just paid the $75 fee to check the court's database, which was updated overnight with all filings through yesterday. The last filings made on the Hamou Bill of Review were on October 8 when the petition was filed and October 9 when the fee was recorded.
There has been no action since. Not one single thing. And there has certainly been no summons issued by the court for anyone to appear.
Hamou is delusional if she thinks she can compel Atchison to do a damned thing.
I won't even bother to ask if Biernat understands any of this.
Oh, and "Snoopy" -- what is harming Oma is not what is on the internet.
What is harming Oma is writing checks on closed and on empty accounts.
What is harming Oma is renting large, expensive houses she cannot afford and then not paying the rent.
What is harming Oma is trashing the houses she rents.
What is harming Oma is claiming to have cancer to get a man to lend her $50,000 and then disappearing.
What is harming Oma is not showing up for court when properly summoned.
What is harming Oma is Oma.
Dear Blake,
I'm pretty sure you and Rob have shut her down with the revelation that the posted notarized document was a (very) clumsy forgery. Any sane person would back away from the car wreck she has created, but of course she can't. I laughed out loud this afternoon when I read her admonition to the other voices in her head that they should cease posting. Five minutes later, wham! She's back on the board, pretending to be Justin Edwards again, posting away as if she had never said it. Oma, can't you keep a coherent thought in your head for five minutes?
What a day! I'm indoors for the night, curled up by the fire with a martini, because, baby, it's cold outside.
Rebecca
Illuminati, not that I'm worried or anything ...... but where are you? It has been three full axial rotation perio -- er, three days since you read this blog from the Hitchin Post and RV Park in Las Vegas.
I did get an expense report in my galactic inbox that I assume came from you. Congratulations on finally mastering some encoding techniques.
I ran "IHOP" through the computer and it produced some very clever equations for interstitial high-orbital parabolas. I cross-referenced to the human internet, and the subtlety of your code became even more impressive. When I cubed the radii of the small pan-fried discs in the "3 Stack with Bacon for $2.99" and multiplied by the price, I found it matched your locker code downstairs in the dungeo -- er, the fitness center. (And, yes, I know what you keep in there.)
Surely you are sending me a message that you miss home.
So come on back. I'll let the matter of the circus dwarfs and the extra pillow case charges slide for now.
Your Lord and Master,
The Real Me
Once again, "Snoopy" proves Hamou knows nothing about legal process, posting:
"Will be interesting to see what Judge Triana will say when she reads the lies told about her by Rob Moshein."
A Bill of Review filed against Bob Atchison relating to a contract dispute is not a judicial forum for airing grievances against Rob Moshein. Sheesh.
Of course, there will be no Bill of Review hearing, anyway.
So let's just indulge Hamou's fantasy for a moment. Let's say Judge Triana (or any other judge) will let her drone on about this and other blogs.
Can you imagine the look on the judge's face when Hamou's criminal history, her unpaid civil judgments, her outstanding arrest warrant, the pleadings that resulted in the Refai default judgment are placed before the judge? Not to mention the localized judgments from Refai and others.
And can you also imagine the judge's reaction when evidence is produced that both the "notarized" document and the Travis County court stamp were forged? The bemused smile will probably fade fairly quickly.
Hamou does realize that, were she to succeed in opening a discussion about Rob and his posts, it will give Bob a platform to produce all those court records, doesn't she?
Doesn't she?
Oh, hell. Probably not. She's just living in one of her twisted fantasies, anyway.
This is one seriously insane woman.
Oh Your Immensity!
I have had a time of it, I don't mind saying, and it has all been for YOU! Right after my last post the large-jawed woman slung the unconscious drunken dark-haired woman into the back of a lime green Gremlin! I barely had time to grab hold of the roof before we had roared off into the night. I could hear moans from the trunk, something about "Justin! Justin! Where are you?" but the large-jawed woman never slowed the pace. We drove for nearly ten hours until we reached the outskirts of a large city in the Pacific Northwest. We rendevoused with another car, a battered BMW driven by an older man with white hair.
"Now what?" He was pretty surly.
"I had to drug her," the large-jawed woman grunted as she rolled the body of the dark-haired woman out of the trunk. There was a perceptible clunk as her head hit the rear bumper on the way down. "Goddamnit, Jim, will you give me a hand with her?" The older man looked displeased, but hooked his hands under the drunken woman's arms and pulled her to her feet. Fortunately, neither of them noticed when I slithered under the Gremlin and clung to the under-carriage.
"Take her back to her house and dump her. Here. I used Google Earth."
"And what the hell are you going to be doing while I take care of that?"
I could hear the drunken lady stirring. "Justin? Justin, why is your jaw so freaking enormous? And are those breasts?"
"Give her another hit of the Kool-Aid." I could hear the liquid gurgling down someone's throat, the the legs of the dark-haired woman suddenly went limp. "I'm going to Vegas, baby."
"I thought I told you to stay the hell away from there. They know you there, remember?"
"That bovine fecal matter went down twenty years ago, Jim."
"Bovine fecal matter?"
"Yeah, I heard the phrase somewhere. Like it?"
"You sound like an idiot."
"Just don't forget to ring the doorbell when you leave her so that someone can taker her inside. I'll call you when I get to Vegas."
"Usual place?"
"Yeah, the Hitchin' Post."
I barely had time to scramble into the Gremlin's trunk before I felt the car creak as the large-jawed woman settled her capacious rear end into the driver's seat.
And we were off!
Several hours later I felt the car slow down. Although we had stopped twice for gas (and Cheetohs, to judge by the wrappers that she kept tossing into the back of the car --- I could peer into it from the trunk), I had not moved from my hiding place, despite the tire jack behind jammed right up my hoojimannis. This time we weren't at a convenience store, but in front of a modest home. I pried my Global Thetan Tracking System out of my pouc --- pocket --- and was able to determine that we were in the state of Utah. By now it was after dark, and we had been driving for nearly an entire day. I watched as the large-jawed woman lumbered up the driveway. I heard her curse as she realized that there was an enormous ladder in her hose, but all she did was pull her skirt down a bit to try and hide it. There was a bonfire burning on the front lawn, not really very big. It was cold, and I found myself looking longingly at the crackling flames. While I was distracted the large-jawed woman rapped smartly on the door. After a moment it opened slightly. A fleshy man with a salt-and-pepper pompadour stood in the light spill from the hall. He was holding a camera.
"Yes?" He asked hesitantly.
"Aren't you going to ask me in," the large-jawed woman said impatiently.
"Do I know you?"
"Mike, it's me! Oma!"
The look on the man's face changed to an expression of horror as he quickly stepped out of the house and closed the front door behind him.
"What the hell are you doing here? I told you I never wanted to see you again! And what the hell happened to you?"
"What do you mean? It's been a few years, sure, but I am constantly being mistaken for a woman in my twenties!"
"If my wife knows you're here she'll kick my ass!"
"Mike, it's me! Oma! You know, the one with that pert ass you loved!"
"Yeah. I think you passed "pert" about forty pounds ago."
"No! Look! I've still got it! Remember this? With that the large-jawed woman lumbered off the front step and moved toward the bonfire.
"What are you doing? No, Oma, don't!" But "Mike" was too late. The large-jawed woman attempted to leap across the bonfire. To make matters worse, at the apogee of her jump she tried to splay her legs coquettishly. The result was predictable. She landed right in the middle of the flames, and the jolt caused an outburst of flatulence. As the methane hit the fire, a molten tongue leaped from the bonfire to the front door. In an instant, "Mike's" house was in flames. He dropped the camera and ran toward the garden house.
Meanwhile the large-jawed woman was dusting herself off, dampening down the stray fires on her sweat pants.
"Mike" succeeded in dousing the fire, although not before the front entrance had been severely scorched. He turned toward the large-jawed woman, a wild light in his eyes.
"What do you want??? You're like some kind of hoodoo, do you know that? In my entire life, you have been nothing but a hoodoo!"
"Not hoodoo, Mike. Hamou! Remember?
A window raised on the second story, and a woman's voice called down.
"Mike! The little girl in the studio wants to know are you comin' back, and can she put her shoes back on if you aren't?"
He raised his voice. "I'll be right up! Christopher Columbus, I just need five minutes to smoke a cigarette!!"
"I thought I smelled smoke!"
"Mike" turned back to the large-jawed woman. "What do you want?" he hissed.
"Twenty bucks. I'm going to Vegas!"
He fumbled with his wallet. "Here, take fifty. Just get the hell out of here."
She pocketed the bills with alacrity. "Thanks, Mike. You're a peach. I'll pay you back, I swear to God."
"You have a mark in Vegas?" he said sourly. "Never mind, just get goin'" And with that he stepped back through his smoldering front door.
"Vegas, here I come!" Once again I felt the axis of the Gremlin groan as the large-jawed woman settled herself into the automobile. We roared off into the night, once more bound for Vegas!
And concealed in the trunk, I felt every single bump in the road. I sustained myself by licking the orange salt from the discarded Cheetoh packages, and thought about how I was doing it all for Theta.
And of course you, Your Minginess!
Hours later we arrived in Las Vegas, a city which resembles the legendary pleasure oases on the planet Deneb --- I mean in France. As we drove down the main street we passed hotel after hotel, each offering the finest in amenities and luxury. My spirits rose. We would finally be lodged in a decent place, and I was sure that I could secrete myself inside one of the spacious suites that the large-jawed woamn would surely rent. By now I was familiar with her methods. She would surely get the largest set of rooms available. Why not? She had no intention of paying for them.
Imagine my disappointment when we left the lights of the city behind us and turned into the Hitchin' Post. It was a place for large wheeled vehicles in which the humans travel the landscape once they have reached their golden years, a time of life in which they seem to prefer to wear comfortable track suits. The large-jawed woman was, of course, the right age, and she was certainly wearing the track suit. So perhaps what drew her to the Hitchin' Post was the same atavistic desire that causes the salmon to swim up the Columbia River.
No such luck. We parked in front of what I believe the humans call a double-wide. Imagine my surprise when the door opened and a naked human wrapped only in a towel stepped out. Imagine my further surprise when he turned out to be exactly my size, and as you know, O Breath Mint of Theta, I am on the small side for a human.
"It's about time you got here," he squeaked ferociously. "I couldn't keep all of the boys together once you were three hours late."
The large-jawed woman extricated herself from behind the wheel of the Gremlin.
"What the hell am I paying you for?" She barked. "How many of you little bastards ate left?"
"Six," the dwarf answered sullenly.
"Six? Who the hell is gonna want to watch a DVD called 'Slut White and the Six Dwarves?"
"What the hell do you want me to do? There are five little people back there shivering like hell. Are we going to do this thing or not? I have to return the camera to the rental place in two hours!"
Suddenly I knew what I must do. I clambered out of the trunk and stepped out of the shadows.
"Will I do?"
Yep, Oma Hamou aka Alexandra McConnell is now certifiably delusional.
PLEASE DO USE THIS IN YOUR LITIGATION OMA, trust me, as should by some bizarre twist of insanity, you show up in Court in Austin, that BOB will indeed introduce this to the Court. And, trust me, the Court will obliged to follow this LAW to the letter:
NO LEGAL ACTION COMMENCES IN TEXAS UNLESS AND UNTIL THE COURT CLERK ISSUES PROCESS AND THE COURT SERVES IT. YOU CAN"T SERVE IT BY MAIL EVER EVER EVER.
TRCP 99a requires you to have the Clerk of the Court issue Citation and delivery of citation and a copy of the ORIGINAL PETITION.
MORON. You STILL haven't served Bob with the Bill of Review yet...
Further: 99b sets for the exact specific and required FORM, Notice etc.
failure to serve in the specific form is the equivalent of NOT SERVING.
MORON
TRCP 103: NO PERSON WHO IS A PARTY TO OR INTERESTED IN THE OUTCOME OF A SUIT SHALL SERVE ANY PROCESS.
YOU OMA HAMOU dont have the LEGAL RIGHT to serve Bob with the Citation therefore anything you send will be refused and returned to you unopened.
MORON
The LAW REQUIRES SERVICE OF PROCESS BEFORE THE STATUTE OF LIMIATIONS EXPIRED. THAT was over a YEAR AGO NOW...MORON
Wilson v. Dunn, 800 S.W.2d 833 Tex Supreme Court 2000:
Actual notice to a defendant, without proper service, is not sufficient to convey upon the court jurisdiction to render judgment against him. See Harrell v. Mexico Cattle Co., 73 Tex. 612, 11 S.W. 863, 865 (1889). Rather, jurisdiction is dependent upon citation issued and served in a manner provided for by law. 837*837 Id.; Panhandle Constr. Co. v. Casey, 66 S.W.2d 705, 707 (Tex.Civ.App.-Amarillo 1933, writ ref'd); see C. W. Bollinger Ins. Co. v. Fish, 699 S.W.2d 645, 655 (Tex.App.-Austin 1985, no writ). Absent service, waiver, or citation, mere knowledge of a pending suit does not place any duty on a defendant to act.<
/B> See Harrell, 11 S.W. at 865; Panhandle Constr. Co., 66 S.W.2d at 707.
and
Primate Const., Inc. v. Silver, 884 SW 2d 151 - Tex: Supreme Court 1994:
<.0B3>The return of service is not a trivial, formulaic document. It has long been considered prima facie evidence of the facts recited therein. Pleasant Homes v. Allied Bank of Dallas, 776 S.W.2d 153, 154 (Tex. 1989); Gatlin v. Dibrell, 74 Tex. 36, 11 S.W. 908, 909 (1889)
The very REASON why Oma Hamou's Bill of Review is DWOP'd and DISMISSED is the FACT that CITATION was not requested, issued, served nor returned to the Court within the OBLIGATORY 12 MONTH PERIOD as set forth by the Texas Supreme Court.
Sorry Oma Hamou, but even YOU are not above the Texas Supreme Court...although clearly YOU seem to believe so.
Rob, Rob, Rob.
This is not about actually commencing a legal action, as she knows she doesn't have a leg to stand on for many reasons.
This is about being able to post endlessly on the internet that a Bill of Review was filed. That Bob Atchison was served. That she will prevail in court this time.
It doesn't matter to her that all those actions are dead letters, legally speaking.
And, of course, Michele Biernat will be humming accompaniment from the Idiot's Choir as this ruse just gets more and more ridiculous.
I do kind of wish that Bob had accepted that envelope, though, just so he could have gotten originals of that forged notary seal and that forged court stamp. But I'm sure copies you downloaded from her website will suffice for our purposes.
Typical Oma, considering herself above the rules as usual.
Oma Hamou GOT a FAIR TRIAL. She didn't like the outcome. Tough.
The LAW provided her with her constitutional rights to appeal or file a Motion for a new trial.
OMA HAMOU FAILED TO EXERCISE HER LEGAL REMEDIES AND RIGHTS. Nobody else interfered with that.
NOW, she wants to say "oopsie" I demand to be heard, even though I FAILED UTTERLY to comply with the LAW AND THE RULES. But hey, I'm OMA HAMOU, I am more IMPORTANT THAN EVERYONE ELSE SO THE RULES DON'T APPLY TO ME.
Oma Hamou brought all this on herself. She failed to exercise her rights in a timely manner and so now has left HERSELF with no recourse. Nothing Bob did, Nothing I did. Oma Hamou did it to herself.
yeah, she is quite delusional for sure.
There is no "technicality" Oma Hamou.
What you call a "technicality" is what rational sane people call THE LAW.
Oma Hamou failed to comply with the LAW. That is no mere "techincality". As a result of her FAILURE to comply with the LAW, the content of her ridiculous documents are MOOT.
NO COURT WILL EVEN LOOK AT YOUR PAPERWORK. THAT IS THE LAW.
You need to get a reality check or find meds for the delusions Oma...
THE LAW IS WHAT IT IS AND YOU ARE NOT SOMEHOW ABOVE OR EXEMPT FROM THE LAW.
Get a grip.
Yet again Hamou proves how completely devoid of understanding she is on matters of law.
Sandman-who-is-Oma posted:
"Moshein & Atchison are not arguing about the substance and merits of Hamou's brief but on a technicality."
First, Moshein and Atchison have clearly said there is no substance or merit to Hamou's claims of perjury and forgery. The merits of her case, including her claims about the proper amount of the invoice, were presented to a jury, and they ruled against her.
But more importantly, Hamou's claim that filing deadlines and statutes of limitation are mere technicalities entirely misses the point of why they exist. Deadlines are imposed because the passage of time erodes the ability of a court to determine the truth. Witnesses become unavailable. Information is destroyed or otherwise lost. Memories fade.
These issues are not technicalities. They go to the very core of the court's ability to adjudicate fairly. And that's the reason courts are strict in holding litigants to those limits.
Hamou had every opportunity to appeal her loss in a timely fashion. She blew it.
Even though a Bill of Review would have been dismissed for that reason alone, she also failed to serve notice for the Bill within the prescribed time period, even though she had every opportunity to do so.
Also, Handmaiden-who-is-Oma posted:
"to even find a reason to dismiss the case they would have to look at the paperwork."
Again, a failure to understand how the law works. Courts do not look for a reason to dismiss a case. They look to see if a case is properly filed and warrants tying up the court's time and resources in moving to the next step.
The first thing they see when they look at Hamou's petition is that service was not made on the defendant within the prescribed time period. That alone tells them there is no reason to look any further at the contents of the filing.
That is why this case was put on the DWOP list (Dismissed for Want Of Prosecution) and acted on with a large number of similar cases en masse, none of which had the contents of the pleadings even looked at by the court.
Sorry, Hamou, but that's the way this works. They did not even look at your "paperwork".
But this one's downright funny .......
"Snoopy" posted:
"we on this forum have brilliantly defended our friend."
Right. That's why Mrs. Batchelor read this blog and Hamou's forum and went to the police to have her arrested.
That's why Eric Cowan read this blog and Hamou's forum and sued her and went to the police.
That's why Hamid Refai and his lawyer read this blog and Hamou's forum and went to the police.
If this is "Snoopy's" idea of a brilliant defense, I shudder to think what his/her idea of a poor defense would be.
Well!!!
Just returned from a VERY interesting trip down to the Travis County Courthouse on Guadalupe.
First off: There is NOTHING NEW FILED in the Bill of Review. Here is a current, updated printout of everything on file in the case straight from the Court Clerk's office:
http://omahamoureport.org/OmaDocketDec20.jpeg
So, Oma Hamou's claim that she filed some "Brief" with the Court is a LIE. The Court itself says otherwise.
I also took a print out of the first page of the FAKE brief with me, the page with that "Received" stamp and the date of Dec 17 2010 and "Travis County Civil Courts" on the bottom.
Nobody in the building uses that stamp. NOBODY. The very nice Mr. Murillo, Assistant Clerk for the District Court was most clear on that point. The only office that uses a stamp that says "Received" instead of "Filed" is the Travis County Constable. BUT their stamp also has the time and says "Travis County Constable" on it.
NOT ONE STAMP IN THE BUILDING SAYS "Travis County Civil Courts". Even the individual Court offices have the specific Court name on them.
OMA HAMOU'S DOCUMENT IS A FAKE. A FRAUD. A DELIBERATE LIE INTENDED TO DECEIVE.
But wait, there's MORE!!
I went upstairs to the Court Administrator's office and asked about the DWOP Calendar specifically. The nice lady up there was very very clear about one point. The Judge in charge of the DWOP calendar is Judge Dietz. The procedure is to look ONLY at the file as of the moment it was placed on the DWOP calendar. Nothing filed after October 19 will be considered. Since Citation has not even been issued, much less served and service returned to the Court for 12 months, the Bill of Review is DISMISSED. Now the PAPERWORK saying so won't be filed for another week or two, but it is as good as dead.
Have a GREAT Christmas!
Rob, I looked again at that date stamp after you mentioned that other problem with it.
"Snoopy" posted that document on the "Ask Oma" forum at 2:06 p.m. (PST) on December 17. Yet the stamp says the "Travis County Civil Courts" received it on the 17th.
Now, how was a document stamped in Austin on December 17 already in "Snoopy's" hands by mid-afternoon that same day?
Sure, Hamou will claim she was physically present in Austin delivering those documents in person and that she rushed a scanned or faxed copy to "Snoopy".
But here's the problem with that claim -- the document does not carry the stamp of the proper clerk for receiving the document. If Hamou had personally been in the courthouse to file the document, she would have been directed to the proper office for making the filing, and it would have the appropriate stamp instead of some stamp that no on in the building uses.
You're obviously right. The "filing" of this document is faked.
Umm, Oma. You really really really need to PROVE and EXPLAIN exactly how "the court itself" stamped that document, when Mr. Murillo, the CLERK OF THE COURT says specifically that THE COURT ITSELF DOES NOT USE THAT STAMP.
Seriously. Nobody is believing your lies anymore. I don't think even Biernat buys this one...
THE COURT ITSELF SAYS YOU ARE A LIAR WHEN YOU CLAIM THAT THAT STAMP IS THE COURT'S STAMP.
Nobody in the building uses that stamp. NOBODY. The very nice Mr. Murillo, Assistant Clerk for the District Court was most clear on that point. The only office that uses a stamp that says "Received" instead of "Filed" is the Travis County Constable. BUT their stamp also has the time and says "Travis County Constable" on it
NOT ONE STAMP IN THE BUILDING SAYS "Travis County Civil Courts". Even the individual Court offices have the specific Court name on them.
Funny Oma. But the COURT ITSELF SAYS YOU ARE A LIAR. THEY WERE CLEAR THAT EVERYTHING SUBMITTED ON FRIDAY IS IN THEIR SYSTEM AND THAT THE STAMP ON YOUR DOCUMENT IS NOT A STAMP ANY SINGLE COURT IN THE BUILDING USES.
YOU REALLY NEED TO PROVE YOUR STATEMENT, BECAUSE THE DISTRICT COURT SAYS YOU ARE A LIAR. NOT ME.
Anyone is free to call the District Court Clerk's office and ask about the stamp and filing.
Phone: (512) 854-9457
ask if any "brief" has been filed as long as you have them on the phone too...
Oma
That "brief" will NEVER show up on their computer.
Why?
Simple you idiot. THAT COURT STAMPS DOCUMENTS FILED WITH A TOTALLY DIFFERENT STAMP. THE STAMP ON YOUR DOCUMENT IS PROOF THAT THE DISTRICT COURT NEVER GOT THAT DOCUMENT. THAT IS A VERBATIM QUOTE FROM MR. MURILLO.
ONLY THE DISTRICT COURT'S STAMP IS PLACED ON DOCUMENTS FILED WITH THEM. THAT STAMP IS NOT THEIR STAMP.
THAT IS VERBATIM FROM MR. MURILLO. MR. MURILLO'S EXACT WORDS "THE FACT THAT STAMP IS ON THAT DOCUMENT IS PROOF ITSELF THAT IT WAS NOT FILED WITH THIS COURT. ANY DOCUMENT FILED WITH US WOULD HAVE THE CORRECT STAMP. THIS DOCUMENT COULD NOT HAVE BEEN FILED WITH US".
Hmmm. Although "Snoopy" is posting his/her little head off right now, I see he/she is ducking the question about how the court physically stamped a document in Austin on the 17th that "Snoopy" had available to post with the stamp on the same day at 2:06 p.m.
Oma Hamou, you are caught in a huge lie.
At this point you really have to offer up more proof than your "say so".
the DISTRICT COURT insists that document was not filed with them. YOU have the burden of proof.
MR. MURILLO'S EXACT WORDS "THE FACT THAT STAMP IS ON THAT DOCUMENT IS PROOF ITSELF THAT IT WAS NOT FILED WITH THIS COURT. ANY DOCUMENT FILED WITH US WOULD HAVE THE CORRECT STAMP. THIS DOCUMENT COULD NOT HAVE BEEN FILED WITH US".
So are you calling the Assistant Court Clerk a LIAR Oma???
WHICH PART OF HIS EXACT WORDS ARE THE LIE OMA???
Post a Comment