I want to make certain readers understand my point of this blog. For years now, Oma Hamou, [who now uses the aka names of Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Murphy, and in years past aka names known to Law Enforcement of Oma McConnell, Oma Demian, Oma Chedid, Oma Ashkenazy, Rebecca Jordan and Jordan Taylor] has made it her life's work to plaster the internet with libel, slander and defamation about me. You can read in previous blogs, for yourself, how she admits that this is her goal.
As there is little Law Enforcement can do to assist me at this time, I can only defend myself here. If Oma Hamou and whatever cronies she may have had just left me alone, there would not have been a need for this blog.
Credibility, as she said, is the key. So judge the woman accusing me for her credibility:
She has THREE felony convictions for fraud, she wrote bad checks.
She was arrested three times as a FELONY FUGITIVE FROM JUSTICE for failing to live up to the terms of her probation for those felonies.
She is CURRENTLY facing trial for FELONY FORGERY Case FVI802540 Defendant 3045972 MCCONNELL, ALEXANDRA OMA in San Bernardino County. Detail are in the most recently previous blog or you can go here http://www.sbcounty.gov/courts/genInfo/openaccess.htm
and read the entire minute orders for the hearings to date on this Felony Crime Charge, as recently as yesterday.
Oma Hamou aka Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Murphy et al has spent about an entire YEAR of her life sitting in jail over the course of her life. Most recently in Victorville California for some six weeks in last November and December. Ask her how she enjoyed her 2008 Thanksgiving Dinner in jail.
This woman has accumulated debt on the public record of nearly one million dollars. This public information is out on the internet and easily found.
This woman lies. Just last night she said that her attorney told her I had spoken to the DA prosecuting her felony Forgery charge and she "knew all about it". This was a bald faced lie. I have never spoken to the DA.
She says "law enforcement" have "told her" things about me. These statements are a bald faced and deliberate lie. I can go on an on, you can read all the previous blog posts I have put up if you want the details.
Now this woman through her old boyfriend Jim Sproul of Northridge California (who by his own admission has given Oma Hamou aka Alexandra McConnell et al OVER ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS AS A GIFT. ARE YOU LISTENING INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE??) now says
"TRUTH
According to the San Bernadino's District Attorney's office Oma Hamou is not on trial for felony forgery."
HERE IS THE TRUTH, STRAIGHT FROM THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY COURT, YOU CAN SEE THAT OMA HAMOU'S STATEMENT SHE IS NOT ON TRIAL FOR FELONY FORGERY IS A BALD FACED AND DELIBERATE LIE MEANT ONLY TO DECEIVE:
Case FVI802540 - Defendants
Seq Defendant Next Court Date Status Agency /
DR Number Arrest Date Count 1 Charge Violation Date
1 MCCONNELL, ALEXANDRA OMA PRE-PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE
07/28/2009 AT 8:30 AM DEPT. V6 ACTIVE SH
070805054 11/07/2008 PC 476 11/07/2008
- Status
Custody Bail
Filing Type Complaint Filing Date 12/02/2008
Ordered Bail $0.00 Posted Bail $0.00
D.A. BRYAN STODGHILL Defense BRIAN WATSON-RETAINED
Next Action: PRE-PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE
07/28/2009 AT 8:30 AM DEPT. V6 Deputy Report #: SH-04 070805054
Warrant Type Status Issued Affidavit
NONE N/A N/A
Probation Type Granted Expiration
N/A N/A N/A
Sentence Convicted Date County Jail CTS
N/A N/A N/A
State Prison Max Sentence
N/A N/A
Fine and Penalty Restitution Fine Restitution to Victim
0 N/A
- Charges
Arrest Charges
Count Charge Severity Description Violation Date Plea Status
1 PC 476 F MAKING, POSSESSING, UTTERING FICTIOUS INSTRS 11/07/2008
Filed Charges
Count Charge Severity Description Violation Date Plea Status
1 PC 476 F MAKING, POSSESSING, UTTERING FICTIOUS INSTRS 11/07/2008 ACTIVE
- Probation
Probation Has Not Been Granted On This Case For This Defendant.
- Related Cases On Calendar
Related Cases On Calendar
This Defendant Does Not Have Any Other Cases With Future Hearings Scheduled.
- All Defendant's Cases
Case Number Filed Date Charges Next Hearing Jurisdiction
This Defendant Does Not Have Any Other Reportable Cases.
- Actions and Minutes
Action Date Action Text Disposition Hearing Type
07/30/2009 9:00 AM DEPT. V6 PRELIMINARY HEARING ACTIVE
07/28/2009 8:30 AM DEPT. V6 PRE-PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE ACTIVE TRC
07/16/2009 9:00 AM DEPT. V6 PRELIMINARY HEARING VACATED
07/14/2009 8:30 AM DEPT. V6 PRE-PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE DISPOSED TRC
Minutes
LARRY W ALLEN
CLERK: LF-LORI FLORES
CERTIFIED COURT REPORTER: BR-BARBIE ROELLE CSR# BR-5376
DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY BRYAN STODGHILL PRESENT.
ATTORNEY BRIAN WATSON-RETAINED PRESENT.
DEFENDANT PRESENT.
-
PROCEEDINGS
ACTION CAME ON FOR PRE-PRELIMINARY HEARING
-
DEFENSE MOTION TO CONTINUE IS GRANTED.
-
HEARINGS
PRELIMINARY HEARING SET ON 07/16/2009 VACATED.
PRE-PRELIMINARY HEARING SET FOR 07/28/2009 AT 8:30 IN DEPARTMENT V6.
PRELIMINARY HEARING SET ON 07/30/2009 AT 9:00 IN DEPARTMENT V6.
DEFENDANT ORDERED TO APPEAR ON HEARING DATE.
-
TIME WAIVERS
TIME WAIVER PREVIOUSLY GIVEN.
-
CUSTODY STATUS
CURRENT BAIL BOND CONTINUED.
CASE CUSTODY - BAIL BOND
============= MINUTE ORDER END ================
06/11/2009 9:00 AM DEPT. V6 PRELIMINARY HEARING DISPOSED
Minutes
JOHN M TOMBERLIN
CLERK: LF-LORI FLORES
CERTIFIED COURT REPORTER: FM-FRANCES MACIAS CSR# FM-10918
DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY CECILIA JOO PRESENT.
DEPUTY PUBLIC DEFENDER 9 PRESENT
ATTORNEY BRIAN WATSON-RETAINED PRESENT.
DEFENDANT PRESENT.
-
PROCEEDINGS
ACTION CAME ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
-
STIPULATED MOTION TO CONTINUE IS GRANTED.
-
HEARINGS
PRE-PRELIMINARY HEARING SET FOR 07/14/2009 AT 8:30 IN DEPARTMENT V6.
PRELIMINARY HEARING SET ON 07/16/2009 AT 9:00 IN DEPARTMENT V6.
DEFENDANT ORDERED TO APPEAR ON HEARING DATE.
-
TIME WAIVERS
DEFENDANT WAIVES HIS/HER RIGHT TO A PRELIMINARY HEARING WITHIN 10 COURT DAYS AND 60 CALENDAR DAYS UNDER PC859B AND 60 DAYS BEYOND 07/16/2009.
-
CUSTODY STATUS
CURRENT BAIL BOND CONTINUED.
CASE CUSTODY - BAIL BOND
============= MINUTE ORDER END ================
06/09/2009 8:30 AM DEPT. V6 PRE-PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE DISPOSED TRC
Minutes
LARRY W ALLEN
CLERK: B6021-LINNEA RIVERA
CERTIFIED COURT REPORTER: CM-CHRISTIE MATHES CSR# CM-6221
DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY JASON WILKENSON PRESENT.
SPECIAL APPEARANCE BY ATTORNEY BRANDON WOOD FOR ATTORNEY BRIAN WATSON.
DEFENDANT PRESENT.
-
PROCEEDINGS
ACTION CAME ON FOR PRE-PRELIMINARY HEARING
-
PARTIES ANNOUNCE READY FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING.
-
HEARINGS
PRELIMINARY HEARING CONFIRMED.
(06/11/09)
ESTIMATED TIME IS 45 MINUTES.
DEFENDANT ORDERED TO APPEAR ON HEARING DATE.
-
CUSTODY STATUS
CASE CUSTODY - BAIL BOND
CURRENT BAIL BOND CONTINUED.
============= MINUTE ORDER END ================
05/13/2009 9:00 AM DEPT. V6 PRELIMINARY HEARING DISPOSED
Minutes
LARRY W ALLEN
CLERK: LF-LORI FLORES
CERTIFIED COURT REPORTER: CM-CHRISTIE MATHES CSR# CM-6221
DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY BRYAN STODGHILL PRESENT.
ATTORNEY BRIAN WATSON-RETAINED PRESENT.
DEFENDANT PRESENT.
-
PROCEEDINGS
ACTION CAME ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
-
STIPULATED MOTION TO CONTINUE IS GRANTED.
-
HEARINGS
PRE-PRELIMINARY HEARING SET FOR 06/09/2009 AT 8:30 IN DEPARTMENT V6.
PRELIMINARY HEARING SET ON 06/11/2009 AT 9:00 IN DEPARTMENT V6.
DEFENDANT ORDERED TO APPEAR ON HEARING DATE.
-
TIME WAIVERS
DEFENDANT WAIVES HIS/HER RIGHT TO A PRELIMINARY HEARING WITHIN 10 COURT DAYS AND 60 CALENDAR DAYS UNDER PC859B AND 60 DAYS BEYOND 06/11/2009.
-
CUSTODY STATUS
CURRENT BAIL BOND CONTINUED.
CASE CUSTODY - BAIL BOND
============= MINUTE ORDER END ================
05/11/2009 8:30 AM DEPT. V6 PRE-PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE DISPOSED TRC
Minutes
LARRY W ALLEN
CLERK: JL-JACKIE LAWRENCE
CERTIFIED COURT REPORTER: CM-CHRISTIE MATHES CSR# CM-6221
DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY JAMES HILL PRESENT.
ATTORNEY BRIAN WATSON RETAINED.
DEFENDANT PRESENT.
-
PROCEEDINGS
ACTION CAME ON FOR PRE-PRELIMINARY HEARING
-
OFF RECORD, COURT AND COUNSEL CONFER IN CHAMBERS
-
PARTIES ANNOUNCE READY FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING.
-
HEARINGS
PRELIMINARY HEARING CONFIRMED.
FOR 05/13/09
ESTIMATED TIME IS ONE HOUR 30 MINUTES.
DEFENDANT ORDERED TO APPEAR ON HEARING DATE.
-
CUSTODY STATUS
CASE CUSTODY - BAIL BOND
============= MINUTE ORDER END ================
04/30/2009 9:00 AM DEPT. V6 PRELIMINARY HEARING VACATED
04/28/2009 8:30 AM DEPT. V6 PRE-PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE DISPOSED TRC
Minutes
LARRY W ALLEN
CLERK: LF-LORI FLORES
CERTIFIED COURT REPORTER: CM-CHRISTIE MATHES CSR# CM-6221
DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY CECILIA JOO PRESENT.
ATTORNEY BRIAN WATSON - RETAINED PRESENT.
DEFENDANT PRESENT.
-
PROCEEDINGS
ACTION CAME ON FOR PRE-PRELIMINARY HEARING
-
PEOPLES MOTION TO CONTINUE IS GRANTED.
-
HEARINGS
PRELIMINARY HEARING SET ON 04/30/2009 VACATED.
PRE-PRELIMINARY HEARING SET FOR 05/11/2009 AT 8:30 IN DEPARTMENT V6.
PRELIMINARY HEARING SET ON 05/13/2009 AT 9:00 IN DEPARTMENT V6.
DEFENDANT ORDERED TO APPEAR ON HEARING DATE.
-
TIME WAIVERS
TIME WAIVER PREVIOUSLY GIVEN.
-
CUSTODY STATUS
CURRENT BAIL BOND CONTINUED.
CASE CUSTODY - BAIL BOND
============= MINUTE ORDER END ================
02/26/2009 9:00 AM DEPT. V6 PRELIMINARY HEARING DISPOSED
Minutes
LARRY W ALLEN
CLERK: LF-LORI FLORES
CERTIFIED COURT REPORTER: CM-CHRISTIE MATHES CSR# CM-6221
DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY CARRIE HALGRIMSON PRESENT.
ATTORNEY BRIAN WATSON PRESENT.
DEFENDANT PRESENT.
-
PROCEEDINGS
ACTION CAME ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
-
PEOPLES MOTION TO CONTINUE (FURTHER INVESTIGATION) IS GRANTED.
-
HEARINGS
PRE-PRELIMINARY HEARING SET FOR 04/28/2009 AT 8:30 IN DEPARTMENT V6.
PRELIMINARY HEARING SET ON 04/30/2009 AT 9:00 IN DEPARTMENT V6.
DEFENDANT ORDERED TO APPEAR ON HEARING DATE.
-
TIME WAIVERS
DEFENDANT WAIVES HIS/HER RIGHT TO A PRELIMINARY HEARING WITHIN 10 COURT DAYS AND 60 CALENDAR DAYS UNDER PC859B AND 60 DAYS BEYOND 04/30/2009.
-
CUSTODY STATUS
CURRENT BAIL BOND CONTINUED.
CASE CUSTODY - BAIL BOND
============= MINUTE ORDER END ================
02/24/2009 8:30 AM DEPT. V6 PRE-PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE DISPOSED TRC
Minutes
LARRY W ALLEN
CLERK: SJ1-SHIRLEY JAUREGUI
CERTIFIED COURT REPORTER: CM-CHRISTIE MATHES CSR# CM-6221
DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY TIM HASKELL PRESENT.
ATTORNEY BRIAN WATSON PRESENT.
DEFENDANT PRESENT NOT IN CUSTODY.
-
PROCEEDINGS
ACTION CAME ON FOR PRE-PRELIMINARY HEARING
PARTIES ANNOUNCE READY FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING.
ADDITIONAL DISCOVERY GIVEN TO DEFENSE COUNSEL
-
HEARINGS
PRELIMINARY HEARING CONFIRMED.
SET ON 02/26/09
DEFENDANT ORDERED TO APPEAR ON HEARING DATE.
-
ESTIMATED TIME IS 2-1/2 HOURS.
-
CUSTODY STATUS
CASE CUSTODY - BAIL BOND
CURRENT BAIL BOND CONTINUED.
============= MINUTE ORDER END ================
01/26/2009 9:00 AM DEPT. V6 PRELIMINARY HEARING VACATED
01/21/2009 8:30 AM DEPT. V6 PRE-PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE DISPOSED TRC
Minutes
LARRY W ALLEN
CLERK: LAS-LUCY SCHNEIDER
CERTIFIED COURT REPORTER: CM-CHRISTIE MATHES CSR# CM-6221
DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY ROBIN HASS PRESENT.
ATTORNEY BRIAN WATSON PRESENT.
DEFENDANT PRESENT.
-
PROCEEDINGS
ACTION CAME ON FOR PRE-PRELIMINARY HEARING
PRELIMINARY HEARING SET ON 01/26/2009 VACATED.
-
HEARINGS
PRE-PRELIMINARY HEARING SET FOR 02/24/2009 AT 8:30 IN DEPARTMENT V6.
PRELIMINARY HEARING SET ON 02/26/2009 AT 9:00 IN DEPARTMENT V6.
DEFENDANT WAIVES HIS/HER RIGHT TO A PRELIMINARY HEARING WITHIN 10 COURT DAYS AND 60 CALENDAR DAYS UNDER PC859B AND 60 DAYS BEYOND 02/26/2009.
DEFENDANT ORDERED TO APPEAR ON HEARING DATE.
-
CUSTODY STATUS
CASE CUSTODY - BAIL BOND
-
DEF REQ CONT FOR ADDITIONAL INVESTIGATION
============= MINUTE ORDER END ================
12/18/2008 9:00 AM DEPT. V6 PRELIMINARY HEARING VACATED
12/16/2008 8:30 AM DEPT. V6 PRE-PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE DISPOSED TRC
Minutes
ANNEMARIE G PACE
CLERK: JL-JACKIE LAWRENCE
CERTIFIED COURT REPORTER: LH1-LEISHA HENDRIX CSR# LH1-11680
DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY ROBIN HASS PRESENT.
ATTORNEY BRIAN WATSON RETAINED.
DEFENDANT PRESENT IN CUSTODY.
-
PROCEEDINGS
ACTION CAME ON FOR PRE-PRELIMINARY HEARING
-
MOTIONS
PARTIES MOTION TO CONTINUE MATTER IS GRANTED.
-
HEARINGS
PRELIMINARY HEARING SET ON 12/18/2008 VACATED.
-
PRE-PRELIMINARY HEARING SET FOR 01/21/2009 AT 8:30 IN DEPARTMENT V6.
PRELIMINARY HEARING SET ON 01/26/2009 AT 9:00 IN DEPARTMENT V6.
DEFENDANT ORDERED TO APPEAR ON HEARING DATE.
-
TIME WAIVERS
DEFENDANT WAIVES HIS/HER RIGHT TO A PRELIMINARY HEARING WITHIN 10 COURT DAYS AND 60 CALENDAR DAYS UNDER PC859B AND 60 DAYS BEYOND 01/26/2009.
-
CUSTODY STATUS
CASE CUSTODY - IN CUSTODY
============= MINUTE ORDER END ================
12/15/2008 BOND PC3000779334 POSTED FOR 25000.00
12/11/2008 9:00 AM DEPT. V6 PRELIMINARY HEARING VACATED
12/09/2008 8:30 AM DEPT. V6 PRE-PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE DISPOSED TRC
Minutes
ANNEMARIE G PACE
CLERK: JL-JACKIE LAWRENCE
MINUTES UPDATED BY SDA-SHERYL ANDRADE
CERTIFIED COURT REPORTER: LH1-LEISHA HENDRIX CSR# LH1-11680
DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAVID FOY PRESENT.
ATTORNEY BRIAN WATSON PRESENT.
DEFENDANT PRESENT IN CUSTODY.
-
PROCEEDINGS
ACTION CAME ON FOR PRE-PRELIMINARY HEARING
OFF THE RECORD, COURT AND COUNSEL CONFER IN CHAMBERS
DEFENSES ORAL MOTION REQUESTING REDUCTION IN BAIL IS GRANTED.
-
DEFENSES ORAL MOTION REQUESTING A CONTINUANCE IS GRANTED.
PRELIMINARY HEARING SET ON 12/11/2008 VACATED.
-
HEARINGS
PRE-PRELIMINARY HEARING SET FOR 12/16/2008 AT 8:30 IN DEPARTMENT V6.
PRELIMINARY HEARING SET ON 12/18/2008 AT 9:00 IN DEPARTMENT V6.
DEFENDANT ORDERED TO APPEAR ON HEARING DATE.
-
CUSTODY STATUS
BAIL REDUCED TO $25000.00.
CASE CUSTODY - IN CUSTODY
COMMITMENT ISSUED (PENDING)
============= MINUTE ORDER END ================
12/03/2008 1:30 PM DEPT. V6A IN CUSTODY ARRAIGNMENT DISPOSED ARRAIGNMENT
Minutes
ANNEMARIE G PACE
CLERK: SDA-SHERYL ANDRADE
CERTIFIED COURT REPORTER: LH1-LEISHA HENDRIX CSR# LH1-11680
ATTORNEY BRIAN WATSON PRESENT.
DEFENDANT PRESENT IN CUSTODY.
-
PROCEEDINGS
ACTION CAME ON FOR ARRAIGNMENT
DEFENDANT ARRAIGNED.
DEFENDANT IS ADVISED OF CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY RIGHTS. (AS ATTACHED AND INCORPORATED)
-
PLEA INFORMATION
DEFENDANT PLEADS NOT GUILTY TO ALL COUNTS.
-
DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR RELEASE ON OWN RECOGNIZANCE IS DENIED.
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
-
ATTORNEY INFORMATION
ATTORNEY BRIAN WATSON RETAINED.
COPY OF COMPLAINT AND DISCOVERY GIVEN TO DEFENSE COUNSEL.
-
HEARINGS
PRE-PRELIMINARY HEARING SET FOR 12/09/2008 AT 8:30 IN DEPARTMENT V6.
AND BAIL/OR HEARING
PRELIMINARY HEARING SET ON 12/11/2008 AT 9:00 IN DEPARTMENT V6.
DEFENDANT ORDERED TO APPEAR ON HEARING DATE.
-
CUSTODY STATUS
CASE CUSTODY - IN CUSTODY
BAIL SET AT $1000000.00.
COMMITMENT ISSUED (PENDING)
ATTORNEY NOTIFIED.
DISTRICT ATTORNEY NOTIFIED.
============= MINUTE ORDER END ================
12/02/2008 1:30 PM DEPT. V14 IN CUSTODY ARRAIGNMENT DISPOSED ARRAIGNMENT
Minutes
PATRICK L SINGER
CLERK: MC1-MARYANN CHAVEZ
-
PROCEEDINGS
ACTION CAME ON FOR ARRAIGNMENT
MOTIONS
ON COURT'S OWN MOTION-CASE OFF CALENDAR.
DEFENDANT REFUSED VIDEO ARRAIGNMENT
-
CUSTODY STATUS
CASE CUSTODY - IN CUSTODY
============= MINUTE ORDER END ================
12/02/2008 JURISDICTION SET TO VS BY OTS310.
12/02/2008 COMPLAINT FILED BY RSMIT
Also, I found an interesting piece someone else wrote about her on the web, here:
http://omahamoureality.blogspot.com/2009/07/anatomy-of-con-oma-hamou-story.html
Yes, judge for yourself if this woman who wants to destroy my reputation in the public seems credible to you.
295 comments:
1 – 200 of 295 Newer› Newest»Carry on...
Yes, you are Oma.
Yes, you are also Larissa, Mona and a thousand of other phony web identities you have created to harass and threaten me over and over again.
You keep trying to change the subject.
You, OMA, are the one on trial for FORGERY, you are the convicted criminal and con-artist.
Threaten me all you want, OMA. It won't work.
You tried to hire a hit man to kill me and stop my case against you. It didn't work, I stood up to you, the case went forward and I won 11-1.
You owe me $23,000.
Then after you pay me you can pay AMEX, Boardrush, Variety, Verio and all the other people and companies you defrauded.
Oma, you are the person on trial for forgery, not me.
All of this is just a smoke screen for the new Forgery charges against you, serious charges that cap a long career as a criminal and con-artist.
Oma, I truthfully reported everything about the murder plot to the police, no lies.
As I have said before, people can judge who they want to believe - you, the convicted criminal and con artist - or me.
Oma, let's see what happens to you in the fall with your Forgery trail.
You can threaten me all you want - it's total BS, the criminal con-artist attacking her victim.
It isn't working.
You know, Oma, your threats to file lawsuits and have people criminally charged would be slightly more credible if you had not been making the same threats for several years now.
The filings are always in the final days of preparation before process is served. The police are always crossing the "t's" and dotting the "i's" on their investigation of the mass of incontrovertible evidence and their interviews with the legions of highly credible witnesses you have produced before obtaining the arrest warrants.
The Mensa lawyers have their briefcases packed for the courtroom. The FBI agents are cranking their vehicles.
And what happens?
Nothing but another interminable round of your insane and poorly spelled posts on the internet.
This is like the movie Ground Hog Day. We just wake up to the same bad joke day after day.
Interesting reading:
http://omahamoureality.blogspot.com/
"Anatomy of a Con: The Oma Hamou Story".
Oma,
HERE is why you have NO CREDIBILITY AND NOBODY, AND I MEAN NOBODY BUYS INTO YOUR EMPTY THREATS. And this is just a TINY sample:
November 26, 2007 "you were put on notice of my intent to file criminal charges against Bob Atchison, Rob Moshein and Pallasart Web Venture, Inc. ... the fact that you have been put on notice of the pending litigation."
July 13 2006:This afternoon Oma sent several letters out by email and by regular mail to several people as a preliminary and necessary step of the pending litigation...The police believe in the criminal complaint that Oma's filed against Bob and Pallasart and everyone says that she's got a great civil case against them....I do plan to file a civil lawsuit against you and Pallasart in the near future and have been cooperating with law enforcement in my criminal complaint against your company and yourself.
August 30, 2006: at least one District Attorney / Attorney General was significantly shocked/concerned by the total effort documented in the 200 plus pages of documents submitted by Oma to various law enforcement agencies, and that were verified by their officers/agents and turned over to them that they are willing to prosecute. we know that this is going to go to court --- as that is what Oma Hamou is devoted to right now. I can tell you this, that Oma Hamou works night and day towards getting Bob Atchison put in jail. She wants him to go to jail. ... well we all (Oma’s friends and former employees of Enigma and such) have absolute confidence in the lead lawyer. We’ve been patiently waiting to file the next round of briefs until the attorneys get all the transcripts in, which I’m told will be sometime next week, with any luck. I know that we have been expecting this to happen for some time, but the court reporter has been awfully busy with other trials that put our request on the back burner. Tell you what, when the brief gets filed (3 briefs) we will publish on this forum their links so people can read and judge for themselves.
9-27-2006 "This is going to court and to trial, make no mistake; all the Court Transcripts are now complete... Expect something to be filed within 10 days, as the legal team has to finish fine tooth combing the remaining pages of transcripts first. But it is going to happen, and then the world will see who is telling the truth"
November 11, 2004 "Justin Edwards" wrote: We won't know when until probably next week when to upload the timeline presentation, as the law enforcement are investigating stalking, harassment, fraud, forgery, tampering with evidence and some other things that are holding things up. So we need to wait until the law enforcement people say we can. ... We don't want to taint the criminal investigation."
FIVE FULL YEARS NOW, OMA/JUSTIN/ALEXANDRA...
FIVE FULL YEARS OF THE EXACT SAME VERBIAGE FROM YOU, SAME THREATS. YOU DON'T EVEN CHANGE THE SYNTAX
NOTHING HAS EVER HAPPENED, SO WHY SHOULD ANYONE BELIEVE YOU NOW?? THEY DON'T.
Here, a couple more golden oldies but goodies:
September 17, 2006 "Mike Newson" wrote: "As to Oma, I know for a fact, she is busy reviewing transcripts, police reports and such because as I understand it they’ve got less than 3 weeks to file that pleading and the clock is ticking. I also know that her criminal complaint is being taken seriously and since I personally have provided Affidavits and such I know that it is real.
September 26, 2006"Mike" wrote: Two Harvard graduates and members of Mensa and a few other groups that are even more rarified and difficult to belong to are working with her towards this next civil suit and are not in the least concerned with the objections that Rob has raised."
9-27-2006, published on the net, speaking to me personally: "This is going to court and to trial, make no mistake; all the Court Transcripts are now complete... Expect something to be filed within 10 days, as the legal team has to finish fine tooth combing the remaining pages of transcripts first. But it is going to happen, and then the world will see who is telling the truth"
Well, "ten days" was up THREE YEARS AGO...
Res Ipsa Loquitur. (look it up Oma...)
Members of Mensa! Good God, run for the hills!
This would be the same Mike Newson who disavowed Oma Hamou years ago, correct?
The article that Paster provided the link to is fascinating, and I highly recommend that anyone interested in the Oma Hamou case at all go read it.
"Two Harvard graduates and members of Mensa and a few other groups that are even more rarified and difficult to belong to are working with her . . . ."
Wow! And I do mean WOW!
Oma has assembled a powerhouse legal team that would make the White House proud. Is Brian Watson leading it?
Well, it is this same Mike Newson, in this email of June 21, 2004:
FYI Mike talked with John he has told Oma its "over" and surprise surprise
she wasnt upset at all. He is in the process of pulling the rest of the
sites and down and getting his name off of everything. He also came clean
with his wife and told her he was in love with Oma.
I think me telling him what would happen if she went to his wife and said
they had sex. He life would be over....so who is now left in Oma court???
Just a guess, but probably not Mrs. Newson.
Okay, people. I cannot believe my eyes.
Oma Hamou just put up this post on her main website in response to the article "Anatomy of a Con":
"Sure she had legal issues decades ago, yes she said she was guilty and took responsibility for her actions, paid the price demanded by society and moved on. Yes, she is now experiencing legal issues because of her blondness, but the situation would not have happened IF all that trash on the web that originated with Bob and Rob was not there."
She currently has legal issues (a felony forgery arrest) because of her BLONDNESS!?!
And it's Bob's and Rob's fault!?!
What the f--k? Did they tackle her, tie her down, and bleach her hair?
No sane person could possibly make this shit up. This woman is STARK . . . RAVING . . . MAD.
Brilliant!
An insanity defense if ever there was one. I hope Mr. Watson can get all this down before next Tuesday's court conference.
Wait a minute here. I'm blond! Actually, I have no idea what color is under there now, but I have been a blond by choice for the past thirty years (I was blond by birth before that). I can assure you that my hair color, real or added, has never given me the overwhelming urge to start defrauding people. Indeed, when I worked in the Middle East it made me quite popular with the menfolk, if I do say so myself. I suspect the color has been good to Ms. Hamou as well, but honestly --- Miss Clairol did not make me do it! I wonder if she will try that defense in court?
Rebecca Jordan, whom Gentlemen Prefer
Mrs. Biernat, why on earth do you keep posting and then deleting it? I'm just curious. I assume that you still think Hamou is telling the truth? Wouldn't Justin EdwardS appreciate alittle moral support, if you can actually use the word "moral" on a blog that focuses on Oma Hamou?
Oma, dear. I, too, read your newest post on your forum. I'm sure we all can understand the burdens that being a blonde has thrust upon you, and we admire your courage in bearing your blondness so heroically these many years.
However, you must try to understand dear Mr. Atchison's viewpoint, too, dear. You did, after all, ask him to introduce you to his friends and associates in Russia, whom you promptly began to mislead and defraud.
Given the predicament in which you placed him by your fraudulent behavior, one really can understand why he felt he had to raise the alarm about you among his associates. Some of them were ready, quite understandably, to think he was complicit in your scam. So what was the poor man to do, dear? Just let it continue without any attempt to protect his own reputation?
And, all kidding aside, dear. It's really difficult to see how being blonde had anything at all to do with it. Mr. Atchison is a blond, too (at least as much as you are), and he was not running around Pushkin promising people millions and millions of dollars he did not have.
Biernat's posts are a signal to Hamou. Sort of like "Semaphore Signals for Morons".
My goodness. Why don't they just use the telephone?
Maybe money. Have you seen Oma's lawyer's office? Or Biernat's house?
You're kidding! That's hilarious!
The signals, the office, or the house?
Yes.
MORE reason Oma has no credibility:
July 8, 2008:
She was lucky enough to find a lawyer recently who cared about more than money. Not only did he care, but he is in the top handful of lawyers in the nation. He figured out what needed to be done and the various entities that needed to be shown --- whatever, and Oma did it. Now it is out of her hands and it will do what it wants, based on the law. Priority is based directly on the perceived harm or potential to do harm to first people and then property, thus it will also react according to its own internal rules, but once set in motion it will eventually complete its mission as justice must be satisfied.
July 6, 2008
The FBI in Texas and law enforcement in California have told me they believe I am a victim of persistent crimes including but not limited to having Bob and his friends attempt to have me arrested for crimes they falsely accused me of, I am a victim of fraud, stalking, harassment and this is just to name but a few of the crimes they've committed against me.
It has been over a year now and???? NOTHING!!!
and HERE:
April 22, 2009
I know I have as of yesterday delivered documents to an attorney Oma has hired someone she paid to write a brief for her to set aside the judgement Bob obtained in 2005 against her based on the facts, to challenge that verdict because Bob deliberately and so did his attorney committed perjury and used forged documents besides based on the representation of his attorney and him, his case should have been tossed out because it named the wrong defendant and plaintiff. I know she has written and may have already today sent the letter to Texas State Bar about Bob's attorney, I know she has spoken to the LAPD and has an appointment to meet with one of the detectives who told her in the past they would help her, so, I guess she is going to sign the affidavit or whatever it is and agree to see it through this time. I have volunteered to drive her to the detective myself and Mike well he has offered to do the same. I know the attorney she hired is gonna file a brief in Federal Court, I know this because the man told me yesterday when I dropped off some of the digital records I've been keeping safe for her,
I can report this is what has happened since yesterday and I can report I know someone is working on a brief to file in Federal Court so Rob can preach and write the Texas courts won't set aside the judgement or do anything because it has passed the statue of limitations all he wants, remember in his brief to the courts he cited cases that were unpublished his Motion in the last round of lawsuit was denied, so Rob let's see if you are right or Oma's attorney wins
So, what happened to the FEDERAL thing, since you now say it will be Texas Supreme Court in October??
and here a couple days later
Oma hired a real attorney, paid him and he is writing a brief on her behalf and it is going to be filed in Federal Courts more important Rob you do not represent Bob Atchison or Pallasart as THEIR ATTORNEY so dude shut Up unless you go on records ONCE the brief is filed as the ATTORNEY FOR BOB AND PALLASART what you say doesn't mean shit. And yep, Oma still plans to next week meet with the detective who back THEN urged her to prosecute so like I said, the attorney she PAID is working on a legal brief to file in court against Bob & Pallasart, she told me the letter to the State Bar was sent, and she isn't going to let us all down and chicken out and say, they'll go away, because she knows you aren't. So when I know the brief has been filed in California Federal Courts I will upload it here and if you are going to go on record as THEIR ATTORNEY I promise Rob I will UPLOAD your ANSWER to the brief filed on Oma's behalf, o.k. so chill
Ummm, Oma, no letter was sent to the State Bar of Texas. I checked. Provide a copy and proof it was sent or give it up.
Again, what happened to all this Federal stuff from just four months ago??
But HERE is my very most favorite:
On April 27, 2009, "Mike" wrote on Oma Hamou's forum:
Mike on Mon Apr 27, 2009 7:24 pm
Speaking of Harm to Oma, those who do believe please pray for her, she is having a major medical crisis right now. Wednesday is the most critical for her.
but WAIT: On TUESDAY April 28, 2009 OMA WAS IN COURT!!
Case FVI802540 Defendant 3045972 MCCONNELL, ALEXANDRA OMA
Action: PRE-PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE Date: 04/28/2009 Time: 8:30 AM
Division: V6 Hearing Status: DISPOSED
LARRY W ALLEN
CLERK: LF-LORI FLORES
CERTIFIED COURT REPORTER: CM-CHRISTIE MATHES CSR# CM-6221
DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY CECILIA JOO PRESENT.
ATTORNEY BRIAN WATSON - RETAINED PRESENT.
DEFENDANT PRESENT.
Yeah, it was a MAJOR medical crisis for sure, if she was well enough to be in court...
and you continue to actually hallucinate that ANYONE believes a WORD you type anymore??
Michele Biernat probably still believes her. The court date was no doubt a typo by the clerk. That's the only possible explanation, since Oma said she was having another one of her major medical crises, and Oma's word trumps court documents any day of the week.
Isn't is just yet ANOTHER odd coincidence that Oma was having yet another "medical crisis" just the DAY before she was scheduled for that pesky Preliminary Hearing.
I mean, wow,what are the chances the EVERY SINGLE TIME Oma needs to stand before a Judge for something important, well, she gets SICK and has another in a really really long string of medical crisis.
I mean, the constant pneumonia and bronchitis, Colon Cancer, Anal Cancer, the rape baby, the two headed baby, baseball to the head, fainting in the bank, car accidents...
Poor Oma is just a medical mess, such a fragile little thing....
As I examine Hamou's posts and correlate them to independently known events, I think we're dealing with a very sophisticated use of code on her part to communicate.
However, given the information that is coming out, I think we can begin to decipher the code.
head injury = I owe somebody money
fainting spell = I owe somebody lots of money
car accident = I owe lots of people lots of money
my wallet was stolen = I just lifted someone else's identity
sick = civil court date
major medical crisis = criminal court date
liar liar liar = they found me out
ciao monkeys = I'll be right back as soon as this panic attack passes
touche = I don't really have an argument; this is the best I can do
mother fucker = my son's on leave from the institution
two deleted posts from Biernat = she read your post, and you're doing well
one deleted post from Biernat = uh oh
the FBI are investigating you = damn, I've got to find someplace to hide . . . quick
Bob's going to be arrested = I've already been arrested
Rob's going to be sued = my lawyer told me to get the hell out of his office
I'm blond = there has to be some reason for being this stupid
I never did porn = shit, they found the videos
Here is more Oma Hamou aka Alexandra McConnell "code"
I have offices in Russia at this address = The Russians said I "could" have offices there after I restore the building, but I haven't done that so the offices have no floors, ceilings or walls but I could have them there maybe.
My Motion Picture is fully funded = I've been trying to scam banks into funding the movie, they haven't said no yet, so MAYBE they MIGHT fund the thing hopefully.
Oma Hamou actress = I was an extra in a commercial once, and porno counts, right?
Oma Hamou Famous Fashion Model = I WAS wearing some clothes for those soft core porn shots some guy took, so I WAS a model even though they never got published.
Oma Hamou Motion Picture Executive = I got this lousy script that I'm going to use to con people out of money, goods and services. Just because I know NOTHING about Motion Picture Production except for what I've seen on TV doesn't mean I can't call myself Motion Picture Executive because that's what I want to be when I grow up.
"colorful past" = long criminal record
I'm in a Safe Shelter program hiding from my stalkers = I'm on the lam from felony prosecution and all those creditors.
I forgot my checkbook = I have no intentions of actually paying you.
I sent the payment by FedEx = I REALLY have no intentions of actually paying you.
I'm on my way to the bank to transfer the funds = Really, dude, there is NO WAY IN HELL I'm ever going to pay you.
Stop STALKING me I'm getting pissed off you keep wanting me to pay you. Stop asking because I really never ever was going to pay you so just stop BOTHERING me already. It won't happen so leave me the hell alone already, I'm busy bilking money from other people.
I'm going to the police to file a complaint against you Dammit, the police are looking for me again.
My lawyers are drafting briefs to file against you as we speak Well, my criminal defense lawyer is working on my Felony Charges, that's the same thing really....
Mr. Moshein, the quotes several posts above make it clear that false information was being put out over the internet claiming you were under police investigation, soon to be arrested, and that lawsuits against you were about to be filed.
Such information is per se defamatory. As it was put out, among other sites, on a site specifically named to reference your business as a wine merchant, this was clearly an attempt to impair your business pursuits.
Of the three people who were involved in taunting you with these purported imminent legal actions, only one is readily identifiable and trackable back to a specific internet address: Michele Biernat, who was posting from the business site of Benefit Design Group in Portland, Oregon.
Even after it became clear from information posted on the internet that Oma Hamou, the woman she was supporting in these taunts, was a convicted felon who is currently on bail for a felony forgery charge, Mrs. Biernat persisted in trying to damage your reputation.
I heartily recommend that you file a legal action against both Mrs. Biernat and the business from which she was defaming you and your business -- Benefit Design Group in Portland.
If you need any assistance, I am at your service.
Regards,
Hedley Artmam, III
Hey Oma,
Let us know how the Trial Ready Conference went this morning. Will you finally have that Preliminary Hearing to be bound over for trial on Thursday like scheduled?
or are we having yet another "major medical emergency" again this time?
This morning, I and a few others went to court with Oma. I proved my identity as being JUSTIN EDWARDS and everyone treated me in kindness, with great respect imagine that!! ;)
There is not going to be a trial and my friend isn't going to have to plead GUILTY to having committed any crime, imagine that!;)
And you Rob wrote Oma is on trial for forgery - guess that makes you a liar, imagine that!;)
All of US got what we needed from this blog and then some. Did we ever. We are busy because in October that Bill of Review is gonna be filed and the criminal stuff concerning Bob and his company is gonna be filed.
The Rebecca Jordan who is registered on Rob's FaceBook good photo wonder if the cops will reveal that you do work in banking world and all that jazz like you wrote on this blog. I wonder if the photo is even you?
Gotta go thanks for providing us with so much to use against Pallasart & Bob Atchison.
But Oma/Alexandra...
First, this was just a Trial Ready Conference....for the Thursday Prelim...Well, we will see what the minutes say when posted in the morning.
And WHAT about ALL those bad checks you wrote to that nice Mrs. Batchelor?? You know, the ones the very SAME DA Bryan Stodghill has on his desk?? He wants to prosecute you for those too....
Well, that lovely Mrs. Batchelor did say she was just looking for restitution for the bad checks Alexandra McConnell wrote her for house rent. That dear District Attorney Brian Stodghill did promise her that if Oma does not make restitution that Oma would go to jail.
We'll just have to wait and see if Oma makes the restitution. This is not the first time she's been in the predicament of staring down the gun at jail for writing bad checks, you know. Sometimes she pays, and sometimes she just assumes a new name and disappears again. I do believe that's why she got arrested in Montana, Wyoming and Utah.
And Justin, I'm sorry I missed you in the courtroom today. I would have loved to catch up. What were you wearing, dear? Mr. Watson certainly looked dapper, didn't he?
Dear Oma,
And speaking of stalking, girlfriend. Yes, it's me. Yes, I work in a bank. You know, where the money is.
And speaking of money, will you be paying Mrs. Batchelor what you owe her?
"Justin Edwards", you were not in court, your wife was not in court, I can't imagine anyone treating you with respect. Did I leave anything out? Why, yes I did. The real Justin Edwards is in Honolulu. He did not fly in for the trial, dear, and his wife --- who hates your guts, Oma --- certainly did not.
Oma, have you heard from American Express yet? Or Variety? Because you will be.
Cheers,
Rebecca Jordan
Dear Rebecca Jordan,
I was in court so was my wife and so were others who were all there to offer our support to our friend.
You were not in court.
Again, I wonder how much of what you wrote on this blog is really true and if the photo on Rob's facebook is really you...
Touche'
By the way, I freely admit I wasn't in court, although I wouldn't be so sure about Penelope, Oma. But I am agog with curiosity. What was Oma wearing? Given the demonstrations of her taste on the internet, I would love to know. On the other hand, I suppose Mr. Watson was just grateful she was wearing anything at all.
By the way, has Mr. Watson been paid yet?
Yeah, about that . . .
Well, that's fair, Oma. Wonder away. I have been wondering for weeks why you only post twenty year-old pictures on the internet. But I wouldn't lose too much sleep over it. Are you on Facebook, dear? Perhaps we could be friends.
I assume you think that I was lying when I said I wasn't in court? Dear me. Can Mrs. Batchelor expect restitution anytime soon? Or will we be pulling up stakes and lighting out for the territories again?
Rebecca Jordan,
You already said you weren't in court...
Touche'
Penny Wilson? The author? Why would she be in court? To support you? Mrs. Biernat listed her and several other people as victims similar to you.
Of course I wasn't in court. Are you drinking, dear?
Rebecca Jordan,
I responded to your post appropriately. As to Michelle claiming Penny was a victim of what prey tell is that all about?
You've tweaked my curisoity...
Touche'
Michelle,
Do you have any clue what this nut is talking about?
Hundreds of posts ago --- which of course could be two days past --- she listed Penny and several others, including Peter Kurth and such as victims of the malevolent forces of Bob Atchison and Rob Moshein. You know, girlfriend. Like you.
You've tweaked mine. Why do you persist in signing posts "touche!"?
Temper, temper, Oma.
Oh, Mrs. Biernat, you really need to be careful here. You could be facing a big fat lawsuit, and unlike your friend Oma, you do have assets. I would think very carefully before picking up the Tar Baby again.
Rebecca,
Why do you believe Michelle can be sued for what? For posting something she can prove is true. She didn't threaten to harm Rob and that is a fact. So what are you trying to get at by pretending oooh, Michelle be afraid, be very afraid or else Bob & Rob are gonna sue you. For what? My God you people never cease to amaze all of us.
Rob, you wrote as a headliner to this blog and so did its sister alter ego, Oma Hamou Reality that Oma is on trial for FORGERY.
This isn't true. I kept telling you Oma wasn't on trial for anything. Both Bob & You have published lots of statement that were designed to mislead those who read the comments made on this blog. In fact both of your posts and Pallasart people were designed to harass, intimidate and so on those of us who steadfastly defend our friend.
A Bill of Review is gonna be filed against Pallasart in October 9REALLY GONNA HAPPEN THIS TIME) based on the element of FRAUD and the statements both Bob and his attorney made to the court which were never properly AUTHENTICATED.
Bob do get ready to prove every word you wrote on this blog's comment page that it is true because your in for one hell of a fight.
That's not a threat from me, Justin but a promise from Oma to you and your company Pallasart...
Touche'
The anatomy of a con sounds like Bob wrote it or maybe you did Rob, I don't know but I know in court we will all find out which one of you wrote it.
Full of lies can't wait to see you the two of you in court. :)
Really, Mr. Moshein, remember to add that to the list of 4, 987 lawsuit threats that she has made since the turn of the century.
I was offering Mrs. Biernat advice, Oma, not threatening her. Unlike you, she has things to lose. And before I go off on wild-eyed promises to sue, sue, SUE, girlfriend, you might want to consider that (1) you have a documented history of stalking and harassing Moshein and Atchison (2) you have more important things to worry about, if what Mrs. Autumnvale was told today was true --- that if you do not make restitution to Mrs. Batchelor, you are going to jail. I would be scouring the landscape for another old person to defraud. I have faith in your ability to do that. (3) there is still Mr. Watson's fee. I know, I know, he'll get it. Just like all of your other lawyers have, right?
Oh, and you are right about one thing. It most certainly is not a threat from Justin. It is a "promise" from Oma. And we know how much Oma's promises have historically been worth.
Rebecca,
Do you know what libel is because what you wrote about my friend is false, defamatory and libelous.
As to Oma filing the Bill of Review against Bob Atchison that is gonna happen. No bullshit. My friend is so fucking tired of this bullshit, Bob and Rob can't continue another year on their crusade against her.
As to stalking my God you're so stupid because WE CAN PROVE BY A LEGAL TIMELINE taking every single fucking letter those two assholes ever wrote, every fucking thing they ever published on the web about Oma which was false, defamatory or libelous up to the current date like today and show they have stalked and harassed her for 9 fucking years.
That is a fact lady a fact that we are all hoping the PROSECUTORS will take into account when they fucking review the legal timeline of events with the actual documentatin.
Bob btw, those letters you posted on this blog that you claim O wrote to the church why didn't you produce them in court when you ORDERED to do so?
Btw, my friend Oma says she never wrote those letters you probably paid someone to write those and pretend it came from Oma. In any event those letters will be asked and authenticated because you have a history of altering and forging documents.
Rebecca,
Can you prove what you write about Oma and her promises that she actually did make promises to specific people. Can you for certain say, yes, she did do this and I have proof, it can't be hearsay because that isn't proof. You must have real proof. I know we on Oma's side have real genuine proof - do you?
Dear Oma,
Please stop using the word "fucking" so much. It makes you sound like a coarse con artist, and we wouldn't want that.
In fact, you have no legal leg to stand on with your blathering about "timeline", as Moshein has tried to point out again and again. You must be a real treat to represent, dear. No matter how often legal concepts are explained to you you cannot understand them
For example, do you understand that a case dismissed "without prejudice" means it can be reopened at any time should the district attorney deem it a necessary move? I would be concentrating on where the money you owe Mrs. Batchelor is hiding at the moment.
I have actually examined every single thing you have posted, Oma. I really have. And I am not a nitwit. Nothing that you have posted offers you a shred of support in any planned legal action (and parenthetically, you do realize that you will have to pay a lawyer to handle that? There's that nasty word "pay" again, Oma.) You have made a public spectacle of yourself on the internet for nearly nine years of sorry misbehavior, softcore porn shots, creating false identities and posting time and again about your, shall we say, grimy past. You have unleashed the shit storm upon yourself, Oma, and you are the only one who can stop it. I know this isn't going to happen short of Jesus knocking you off your ass on the way to Damascus, and even then you would probably find a way to lift His wallet.
Rebecca
I suppose this means we won't be Facebook friends? Darn it.
Oh, and yes, as a matter of fact, I can prove it. Dis you not promise Amex to pay them? Did you not promise the caterers to pay them? Did you not promise Dun and Bradstreet to pay them (not that I don't applaud you for rooking Dun and Bradstreet, girl, there are a lot of us who would like to try that!), did you not promise restoration funds to the Alexander Palace, did you not promise to pay Bob Atchison for the work his company performed for yours, did you not promise all of the other lawyers etc. that have sued you over the years to pay them? Your past is largely a matter of public record, and a sorry record it is, too.
So stop asking --- in words you will understand, Oma --- so many fucking imbecilic questions.
Justin/Oma, all this crowing because you are not going to prison reveals just how morally bankrupt you really are.
Let's take a breath and go over what happened here. You wrote Mrs. Batchelor a check for over $5,000 with no means to cover it. An honest person would not do that, but a con artist would.
You were arrested for forgery, put under $1 million bail, and sat in jail for six weeks. That is not something that often happens to an honest person.
Mrs. Batchelor had to file a lawsuit againt you to try to recover the money of which you defrauded her. She would not have had to sue an honest person to get the money she was owed.
You are not avoiding jail because you have been vindicated, you dolt. You are avoiding jail because you had to cut a deal to cough up the money you tried to scam from Mrs. Batchelor.
Once again, you scouted out a victim who you felt would not go to the mat in prosecuting you for your crime -- a classic con artist maneuver.
Only a morally bankrupt, sociopathic con artist would be crowing about vindication in these circumstances.
We'll all be waiting with bated breaths for this barrage of lawsuits you are going to release against Rob and Bob, by the way.
I assume Justin and his wife will be at those trials, too, since they have shown up at every other trial, interview with a DA, and meeting with your lawyers (even though no one else has ever seen them except for the time droopy drawers showed up in Austin to see you defeated before he moved to Honolulu.)
Justin/Oma posted:
"I proved my identity as being JUSTIN EDWARDS and everyone treated me in kindness, with great respect imagine that!!"
Exactly why were you required to present proof of your identity, dear? I have witnessed several legal proceedings, and I have never seen anyone be required to present proof that they are who they say they are, especially someone who has had so many meetings with Oma's lawyer and the District Attorney.
Rebecca,
Please for the record and the upteenth time stop calling me by my friend's name.
My friend has every right to pursue a criminal conviction or prosecution of Bob Atchison & Pallasart.
I wrote my friend Oma is having a BILL OF REVIEW presented to the Texas Supreme Court in regards to the FRAUD perpetrated in court by Bob and his attorney.
Will the Supreme court set aside Bob's judgment that he obtained fraudulently against my friend, I don't know. You don't know. To say you know for certain this will not happen you are lying.
I also wrote on this blog that my friend is asking criminal charges to be filed against Bob Atchison & Pallasart there are NO LEGAL TIME LIMITS placed on matters such as but not limited to the fact that Bob Atchison has stated on this blog my friend hired John Lupoli to MURDER him when in fact the DA and FBI said Bob Atchison's complaint lacked any evidence to support that this happened.
This is all happening in October the Bill of Review and the criminal matter my friend is filing against Bob Atchison and his web company Pallasart.
My friend has every right to demand a full investigation into the criminal matters that have been published on this blog and elsewhere and represented as being the God honest truth.
I told you Rebecca this can't go on for another year JUSTICE needs to be metted out. You wrote under the name Rebecca Jordan alot of things which you will have to prove is TRUE.
According to law enforcement have advised Oma in what way to go after Pallasart & Bob Atchison.
Touche'
Penny,
You said you were in court then prey tell please tell us all what I was wearing, what my wife was wearing, what color was the suit Mr. Watson Oma's attorney was wearing, what was Oma wearing.
Of course your idiot once I learned Rob wrote a letter to the DA saying that it was Oma not I posting on this blog, of course I went in and introduced myself to everyone.
As I said I and others went to court this morning to support our friend. You were not there. You cannot in truth write the answers to my questions because you were not there. Your post is designed to intimidate and harass me because I continually defend my friend.
Thank you very much!
Not one word is true?
So McConnell was not arrested on November 2, 2008 on a felony charge?
So McConnell did not sit in jail for six weeks under $1 million bail?
So McConnell was not sued by Hui Ku Batchelor?
Please specify which of the above assertions is not true.
I have no idea what Justin Edwards and his wife were wearing today, dear, because they were not in California.
And by the way, dear, I think you meant "pray", not "prey". The first denotes a request. The second is a hunted animal. I do understand, though, how you could get the two confused, dear.
Oma has never been sued by this person called "Batchelor".
To the best of my knowledge, Oma did not sit in jail for 6 weeks.
Oma was not arrested on November 2, 2008.
Penny,
Again for the record my wife and I were in court this morning as was others to support our friend Oma Hamou.
Thank you.
Please what color of suit was Oma's attorney wore? What did Oma wear? How many persons were sitting in the same pew (is that what they are called?) with her?
You can't answer because you weren't there. Your post was designed to harass and intimidate me because I am defending a friend.
Thank you.
SO BLAKE I AM WAITING FOR YOUR RESPONSE...
See I know we got Rob and Bob for libel and stuff so come on prove your telling the truth and by God I will prove your not.
Lie to us some more baby!
Then I'm afraid the district attorney was rather confused dear, because he had the criminal and civil records of Oma in court with him today when he was discussing the Alexandra Oma McConnell case. He even reviewed them earlier with Mrs. Batchelor's son, Nick.
Oma,
No, I don't think I will call you Justin. It is belying fact, and when I have done so, you still are rude, so why bother supporting your psychosis?
As I have now said three times, I was not in court this morning. Neither was Justin or his wife --- honestly, Oma, you should be glad of that, she hates you --- so I have no idea what summery frock Oma may have been sporting. It really doesn't interest me. I've seen some of the polyester wonders she wore back in the day, and of course we all agree about the coffin silk wedding dress she wore to be baptized or whatever arcane ritual was taking place in the basement.
You're obviously dying to tell us what you wore, so have at it.
I am not Oma!
You're right. It does feel good to write that!
Rebecca Jordan
Penny,
Once again you have proven that you are lying. The son of BATCHELOR was not in court this morning because I did not see him and neither did anyone else. What may be true is the DA talked with this son that probably did happen. Nothing else you wrote happened. And of course the DA and Oma's attorney spoke, yes this did happen that's what people do.
And your point....
There is none....
Touche'
Rebecca,
What a real loser you really are, I feel sorry for you.
I can't wait to discover if your name is really Rebecca Jordan and if you really do work in bank and so on.
I was there in court with others like Mike Newson and my wife and others to support our friend Oma Hamou.
What you wrote on this blog about my friend Oma Hamou is false, libelous and defamatory and one day you will get to prove every single word you wrote is the God honest truth.
I can't wait...
Touche'
I did not say Nick was in court today, dear. I said the DA reviewed Oma's history earlier with Nick. Nick spoke with the DA this afternoon, after the conference.
And I have to say, dear, Nick has the rather strong impression that the District Attorney is absolutely resolved to have you thrown in jail if you do not make restitution to dear Mrs. Batchelor. (Unless, of course, you change your name and go to ground again, dear.)
Thank you very much for letting us know that All of you have been in touched with the alleged victim.
It still doesn't change the fact that what you wrote on this blog about Oma Hamou is false, lebelous and defamatory.
All of this will be used later against Bob Atchison & Pallasart.
Touche'
And so will the stuff about Oma accusing Tina Van Veen of stealing her identity and that is the reason why she Tina was arrested.
None of what was posted on this blog was true...
As was the shit about Oma hiring John Lupoli to murder Bob Atchison to end his Bob's lawsuit when in truth Oma had filed a counter lawsuit against the asshole...
Touche'
Hoo boy. That is quite an entourage you had with you, Justin/Oma. The Edwardses flew in from Honolulu. Mike Newson came down from Utah. And all just for a pre-trial conference. Thank God there was not a full trial. They would have had to rent a circus tent to hold the legions of your -- er, her -- supporters.
Let's not forget the FAKE LETTERS POSTED on this blog that Bob says was written by Oma yet the asshole never produced them in court when he was ordered to so.
Dinne is on the table;)
Touche'
Blake,
You are a liar bastard and liars are incapable of telling the truth and as such I will refuse to answer your posts. You posted lots of stuff about Oma and her being arrested on such and such date and being sued by this woman and sitting in jail for 6 weeks none of what you posted was the truth.
Touche'
Well, Justin/Oma dear, I do hope you pay off poor Mrs. Batchelor before you go writing bad checks to lawyers for all these lawsuits you are going to be filing.
By the way, what happened to that countersuit you filed against Mr. Atchison, dear? You've been involved in so many lawsuits that I just cannot keep them straight, try as I might.
At least have a sensible salad. Or are the imaginary people in your head taking you out to Olive Garden to celebrate?
Dear, when someone refuses a judge's order, they are usually held in contempt. What sanctions did the judge impose on Mr. Atchison when he refused that order to produce documents?
And please, dear, help me keep all this straight. Are you referring to an event in the lawsuit against him, which you dismissed, or in the lawsuit against you, which he won?
Okay, this is getting weird, Justin/Oma.
Are you actually saying that Oma McConnell was not the person arrested in San Bernadino County? Was someone else using her name (for a change)?
Blake you wrote:
Not one word is true?
So McConnell was not arrested on November 2, 2008 on a felony charge?
So McConnell did not sit in jail for six weeks under $1 million bail?
So McConnell was not sued by Hui Ku Batchelor?
Please specify which of the above assertions is not true.
NOT ONE WORD YOU WROTE AS FACT IS TRUE. NONE OF IT HAPPENED. DO YOU KNOW WHAT LIBEL IS? OF COURSE YOU DO, ;)
TOUCHE'
Penny,
Bob Atchison oublished on this blog or was it Rob letters they say Oma wrote to Church officials in Russia back in 2000 thereabouts. They were both ordered by the court in Oma's civil lawsuit to PRODUCE ALL DOCUMENTS relevant to Oma Hamou none of these supposedly letters were produce not one single letter. Why weren't they produced? Because Oma never wrote them and they were written by a person Bob Atchison paid. That's why. They are FAKES just like Bob Atchison's invoice submitted to the court as evidence that Oma owed Bob not his company Pallasart.
Touche'
Oh, my. This is all very confusing, Justin/Friend of Oma. There are actual court records showing the arrest of Alexandra Oma McConnell. There are actual sheriff's records saying the person thrown in jail was born on August 1, 1963, is 5'0" tall, and weighs 155 pounds. There are actual court records of a lawsuit filed by Hui Ku Batchelor against this same Alexandra Oma McConnell.
It's so very distressing to think that so many official records could have confused the arrestee/defendant with the woman who has used the name Oma Hamou, who was born Oma McConnell on August 1, 1963, who is 5'0" tall, and who has posted on the internet that she took the name Alexandra.
Do the unfortunate coincidences just never end?
Perhaps Bob Atchison had Nitzana Kedem write those letters, dear? The overwrought sentimentality and stylistic excesses were certainly the same.
Penny,
What you write is false, libelous and defamatory.
Oma was never arrested on November 2, 2008.
Oma was never sued by BATCHELOR and you cannot produce such a document.
Oma did not sit incarcerated for 6 weeks.
I don't believe that they wrote Oma was 5"0 and 150 lbs she is 5"8 --
Touche'
Nitzana is a real person just like Mona Wilson and others like myself and Mike Newson and so on we are real people. And when the time comes I know we can prove we exist while none you can't prove we don't.
Touche'
From 2000 to the present moment the MO of Pallasart, Bob Atchison have been that NO ONE IS REAL WHO DEFENDS OMA HAMOU.
This too is well documented in the legal timeline which is gonna be used against Bob Atchison & Pallasart.
Are you ready Bob?
I know Oma is...
Touche'
Well, will miracles never cease? How ever did Oma get so much taller than she was in Austin? If she could just market that nifty medical secret she would never have to write a bad check again, except for old times' sake, of course.
And I do believe Oma did not sit incarcerated for six weeks. I'm sure they allowed her to stand and walk around, at least a bit.
But I do fear you may be wrong, dear, in saying they never wrote Oma was 5'0" tall. It's right on the official San Bernadino government website.
"I know we can prove we exist while none you can't prove we don't."
Oh, dear. As if your double negatives do not confuse your message enough, you've now moved on to triple negatives?
"None you can't prove we don't" . . . ?
What the hell does that sentence mean? Excuse my French, dear, but are you fucking drunk again?
No one here said Nitzana is not real, dear. Why, she's been here numerous times with us on this very blog. And she seems like such a nice young woman, despite the bitter disappointment of her derailed career in journalism.
Please note that, far from denying Ms. Kedem's existence, I was suggesting that she might have been the person who wrote the letters you said poor Mr. Atchison had written to serve his nefarious purposes.
You really should be prepared to accept a helping hand when it's extended, dear. You've had a rough few months, you know.
So Oma was never arrested on November 2, 2008.
Oma did not sit in jail for 6 weeks.
Oma has not been sued by a person with the last name of BATCHELOR.
Oma is not on trial for forgery and has never been.
And most importantly Oma is not 5"0 a 150 pounds.
*Snicker*
Omele! You beat the rap for a change! Not really, of course, there's still the pesty restitution thing, but we all know you can be relied upon to do the right things. You always do, bubbele!
And I hate to be the one to tell you, sweetheart, but my sister wouldn't cross the street to spit on you if you were on fire.
And darling, don't be ashamed that you're a little zaftig. Even Elizabeth Taylor had spells where there was more of her to love.
Poor Mrs. Batchelor. Isn't there some kind of program to protect the elderly against . . . well, let's just say against the seedier elements of society?
So exciting!
Mitzi
Rebecca Jordan,
I posted your photo on Oma's forum and your opening line of how you came to find this blog. Of course you got to know something when I googled your name at that time there was no mention of Oma Hamou. It was only until I put in your name together with her's did I come up with this blog. Guess that makes you a liar. Anyhow, nice photo...I lifted it off of Facebook on Bob Atchison's site and of course Rob's.
Night All!
Blogger Justin Edwards Friend of Oma Hamou
So Oma was never arrested on November 2, 2008.
Oma did not sit in jail for 6 weeks.
Oma has not been sued by a person with the last name of BATCHELOR.
OMA, PRETENDING TO BE "JUSTIN EDWARDS" USING THE ALIAS NAME OF ALEXANDRA YOU ARE A TOTAL COMPLETE BALD FACED DELIBERATE LIAR:
Arrest Charges
Count Charge Severity Description Violation Date Plea Status
1 PC 476 F MAKING, POSSESSING, UTTERING FICTIOUS INSTRS 11/07/2009
Deputy Report #: SH-04 070805054
Case FVI802540 Defendant 3045972 - MCCONNELL, ALEXANDRA OMA
Custody Bail
Filing Type Complaint Filing Date 12/02/2008
Ordered Bail $0.00 Posted Bail $0.00
\ 1
Complaint Type: Claim of Plaintiff
Filing Date: 03/12/2009
Party Number Party Type Party Name Attorney Party Status
1 Small Claims Plaintiff HUIKU BATCHELOR
2 Small Claims Defendant ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL
03/12/2009 CREDIT CARD TRANSACTION ID NUMBER 0240053951237
03/12/2009 CLAIM OF PLAINTIFF >$5,000 <$7,500
Oma Hamou pretending to be Alexandra McConnell was in CUSTODY IE JAIL from NOVEMBER 7 2009 UNTIL DECEMBER 20 2009
YOU ARE A TOTAL LIAR FOR CLAIMING OTHERWISE. PERHAPS THE SAN BERNARDINO COURT IS LYING WHEN THEY REPORT THIS??
There's some very interesting psychology going on here.
For many days now, Justin/Oma has acknowledged that Oma was arrested and charged with a felony. His/her argument has not been that there was no arrest or that there had not been several court appearances, but that there had not yet been any probable cause finding that would bind him/her over to trial.
In one post, Justin/Oma even acknowledged that Oma might go to prison for this one.
Now that the case has been conditionally dismissed (conditional, of course, on his/her making restitution to the victim), Justin/Oma's argument has become that there never was an arrest or a charge in the first place.
Is that how the mind of a sociopath works? Once a crisis has passed simply to try to erase from history and from memory an event that plunged the sociopath into crisis? Is that how a sociopath compartmentalizes his/her behavior to enable him/her to move on to the next scheme and the next victim?
It's also interesting that Justin/Oma is claiming there was never a civil lawsuit filed in this matter against him/her. In fact, Alexandra McConnell was the defendant in San Bernardino Superior Court case number SMCVS900686, filed against her by Hui Ku Batchelor on March 12, 2009.
But most interesting of all is this post by Justin/Oma:
"And most importantly Oma is not 5"0 a 150 pounds."
Perhaps Justin/Oma is 4'11" or 5'1". But both people who have seen her in the flesh and the Sheriff's Deparment arrest records attest to the fact that she is extraordinarily short and somewhat wide.
With all her recent legal woes, what concerns Justin/Oma most? That readers on this blog will not buy into the self-delusion that Oma is the lithe, willowy, eternally-young blond vixen whose heavily photo-shopped photos are plastered all over his/her websites.
Yes. This woman is one very strange brew of psychological disorders.
Oh, dear. It seems things are not quite over yet. Oma (if I may call you that, dear) did not have her case dismissed yesterday, after all.
It was continued at the request of the defense, with the court noting that this would probably be the last continuance it would grant. (There have been so many, it seems.)
There was mention of a "packet forthcoming" from the district attorney regarding a possible civil compromise.
Another entry in the court's record system indicates that "defendant" will have to make "restitution to victim".
Defendant? Victim? My, those seem such harsh words to use about our poor, dear, ever-dieting girl. Where is that court's empathy? It would almost make one think Oma was involved in something criminal that had harmed someone.
I must say I was disappointed to find nothing in the record that indicates our dear Oma was protesting she did not bilk poor old Mrs. Batchelor in the first place. I had so hoped to find something in the proceedings that would exonerate Oma of the underlying deed that generated all this nasty little court business.
No such luck, dears.
(And, Oma, dearest. I'm sorry to say that the court records also indicate the defendant standing before the court yesterday was 5'0" tall and weighed 155 pounds. You really should protest this calumny and make them adjust their records to show your desired height and dress size, dear.)
Dear Jean Valjean,
Post your head off, dear. And as I told that nice Mrs. Biernat when she was unable to "find" me on Google, I am all over the place. Perhaps not on the same kind of internet sites that you frequent, girlfriend, but any decent financial search engine will turn me up reasonably quickly.
So what we are looking at here is a little short of complete vindication? And she did time, and she has cut a deal so that she has the chance to make restitution to her victim? That would be the woman otherwise known as the plaintiff? So much for your position as the Dreyfus of the 21st century, Oma.
That's a lot to carry on a small frame. But I suppose during your six weeks in the clink they force fed you a lot of starches. I know! You should sue the state of California!
TOUCHE! (What exactly do you think the word means, Oma?)
Best,
Rebecca Jordan
Sorry, my previous post should have read:
Oma Hamou pretending to be Alexandra McConnell was in CUSTODY IE JAIL from NOVEMBER 7 2008 UNTIL DECEMBER 20 2008
YOU ARE A TOTAL LIAR FOR CLAIMING OTHERWISE. PERHAPS THE SAN BERNARDINO COURT IS LYING WHEN THEY REPORT THIS??
So, more deliberate LIES from Oma Hamou/Alexandra McConnell using the alias Justin Edwards:
A Bill of Review is gonna be filed against Pallasart in October 9REALLY GONNA HAPPEN THIS TIME) based on the element of FRAUD and the statements both Bob and his attorney made to the court which were never properly AUTHENTICATED.
You can NOT file a Bill of Review against Pallasart. Pallasart WAS NOT A PARTY TO THE ONLY SUIT THAT WENT TO TRIAL! The Judgment is personal to Bob Atchison.
OMA YOU NONSUITED ALL CLAIMS AGAINST PALLASART. Filing ANYTHING with the Supreme Court of Texas WILL BE DELIBERATE ABUSE OF THE LEGAL SYSTEM AND HARASSMENT as Pallasart is not a party.
Secondly; you can't file a Bill of Review anyway:
1.The failure to seek a new trial, appeal or reinstatement, if you can timely do so, is negligence, Gold v. Gold, 145 S.W.3d 212, 214 (Tex. 2004)
2.As the Texas Supreme Court
has stated:
An attack upon a judgment based on intrinsic fraud
is not allowed because the fraudulent conduct may be
properly exposed and rectified within the context of the underlying adversarial process itself. In contrast, a collateral attack on a judgment on the basis of extrinsic fraud is allowed because such fraud distorts the judicial process to such an extent that confidence in the ability to discover the fraudulent conduct through the regular
adversarial process is undermined.
Browning v. Prostok, 165 S.W.3d 336, 347 (Tex. 2005) at 348.
Examples
of intrinsic fraud include fraudulent instruments, perjury
Wise v. Fryar, 49 S.W.3d 450, 455 (Tex. App.—Eastland
2001, pet. denied)(alleged lying is intrinsic fraud)
or any matter which was actually presented to and considered by the trial court in rendering judgment.
See, e.g., Browning, 165 S.W.3d at 349
But, actually, Oma, I DO hope you file your Bill of Review, because since this is a Post Judgment motion, you will be required to post a BOND equal to the amount of the judgment you owe, currently something a bit north of $23,000 because of almost five years of interest accruing, so WHEN your Petition is denied BOB GETS PAID!! HOW COOL WILL THAT BE??
Rob Moshein,
A Bill of Review despite your objections will be filed in October 2009 with the Texas Supreme Court regarding Bob Atchison.
Touche'
Good deal Oma. Bring it on.
The deadline is October 11. Not a day later...
Oh, do read:
CIVIL PRACTICE AND REMEDIES CODE
TITLE 2. TRIAL, JUDGMENT, AND APPEAL
SUBTITLE D. APPEALS
CHAPTER 52. SECURITY FOR JUDGMENTS PENDING APPEAL
Bills of Review fall under the rule.
Make certain that Bond you deposit includes all that interest. In Texas, the rate has been 18%, so the current amount, give or take is $23,600.
Do you need the address for the Supreme Court of Texas?
Supreme Court of Texas
Supreme Court Building
201 W. 14th Street, Room 104
Austin, Texas 78701
Rob,
I am not Oma but what you wrote about the BILL OF REVIEW is ACCURATE. This is why the month of October is pretty damn important to all of us, especially to Oma.
Tell us Rob why do you delete my posts because they speak the truth?
Wowie zowie.
Not only does Oma have the money to pay restitution to Mrs. Batchelor, to post bail, and to pay her lawyer for quite a few court appearances in the matter; she also has the money to post a $23,000 bond for yet another legal action in Texas.
With all that dough at her disposal, why would she be passing bad checks to nice little old ladies?
Oh, dears. I am so excited I can hardly stand it!
Oma is going to launch legal proceedings against Mr. Atchison (again). At long last, we'll all get to meet Justin and, I do hope, his delightful wife.
Who knows? Maybe we'll even get to meet Mike Newson, since he, too, traveled all that way to attend her pre-preliminary conference yesterday. Such friends are rare, indeed.
Surely all of Oma's friends and supporters will be in attendance for an event as monumental as the launch of her grand legal salvo against Mr. Atchison.
But I'm perplexed, Oma dear, about why you're waiting all the way until October to file this Bill of Review that has been your dream for ever so long. Isn't that cutting it rather close, dear? What if you miss your plane? Or your car breaks down? Or no one can feed your cats? Or your frock is not back from the alterations in time? Or you break a heel heading into the clerk's office? Or you have one of your many car accidents, head injuries, fainting spells, or outbreaks of cancer?
Please, dear. Don't risk disappointing us. Don't.
File early, and file often.
Oh, Justin/Oma, Justin/Oma, Justin/Oma. Why are you so resistant to a good grammar lesson, dear?
In the post where you wrote:
"Tell us Rob why do you delete my posts because they speak the truth?"
. . . you are actually asking yourself whether your own posts speak the truth.
If you meant to ask whether Mr. Moshein deleted your posts because they speak the truth, dear, the sentence should have been either structured or punctuated differently.
As for deleting your posts, several of us have asked Mr. Moshein not to be overly diligent in doing so, as they provide us so very much fodder for satire.
He has agreed, and he only deletes those of your posts with are hopelessly incoherent, laced with far too much vulgarity, or tiresomely redundant. Unfortunately, dear, that constitutes quite a bit of your internet opus. But, given the sheer volume of your posting, that still leaves us with quite a bit with which to work.
I particularly loved your volte face whereby you suddenly switched from arguing that you -- er, she -- might not get all the way to trial to arguing that you -- er, she -- had never even been arrested, was not charged with a felony, and had not been sued by Mrs. Batchelor.
And, as you see, dear, Mr. Atchison was good enough to leave those posts up. Some jewels of farce are just too, too rare to discard, no matter how deep the muck in which they are found, dear.
First,
Dear Ms P., Mr. Atchison has nothing at all to do with this blog. He has only posted here under his own name.
I alone, Rob Moshein decide what posts stay and which I delete. Bob does not even have the access password for the Blog.
Second.
Oma you can "file" all the "criminal complaints" you want. You've been "filing" these same "criminal complaints" for some seven plus years now.
By your own ADMISSION, that doesn't come close to being actually GUILTY of anything.
So, file away. The police will do what they have been doing with ALL the "criminal" complaints you have been filing for years.
N O T H I N G
and Don't forget what one most helpful law enforcement office I spoke with on the phone told me:
"We can't actually TELL the person who filed the complaint that their complaint is bogus and so we won't do anything about their complaint. We just tell them "it's under investigation"...but nothing ever actually comes of the "investigation"...
Like your taxes Oma...
File Early and File Often...
Oh, you don't PAY taxes, do you?
At least we can find out when you get served with a Debtor's Exam when you file that "Bill of Review"....That will be fun.
Oh, my goodness, Mr. Moshein, is my face red.
Of course I knew, dear, that you administer this blog. I have just seen the Rob & Bob, Rob & Bob, Rob & Bob refrain so often on this blog from Ms. Hamou that I committed a little faux pas.
At my age, these things sometimes happen.
It would help, however, if at least one of you would change your name to something less similar to the other. Have either of you considered becoming Nicholas?
Oma, dear. I know I can be a little fussbudget, but I do like to tie up loose ends here and there.
Whatever happened to those charges against you in Los Angeles County for driving without a license, registration, or insurance, dear?
Gee Oma,
Since the San Bernardino County Court records show your "Arrest Date" as November 7, 2008, take it up with THEM if you think this is inaccurate.
Here it is again:
1 MCCONNELL, ALEXANDRA OMA
DR Number 070805054
Arrest Date 11/07/2008
Count 1 Charge PC 476
Violation Date 11/07/2008
So, go sue the San Bernardino Courts. I'm reporting THEIR public information....
Speaking of STALKING:
Oma Hamou aka Alexandra McConnell now using the alias "Justin Edwards" is STALKING me. She is stalking my Facebook page to steal my Facebook friends' photos and to now disparage people on Facebook...
and she accuses ME of stalking???
How pathetic...
Hey, P, I'm surprised you haven't heard back from Justin/Oma claiming she was never charged with three counts of vehicle code violations.
It is Los Angeles County Superior Court case number LAX7WA02012-01, filed against Oma Hamou, DOB 08/01/1963, on June 29, 2007.
But you know the really interesting thing? Hamou was not present when the case was called (big surprise, huh?), so the judge issued a bench warrant on July 3, 2007 for her arrest. The warrant is still outstanding, which means she's on the lam from the law in L.A.
No wonder she moved her cons up to San Bernardino County, although you can't really say that went very well for her, either.
Anyhoo, I wonder if that's why someone from the Hesperia government offices read the blog this evening. Isn't that where the DA on her felony charge is based?
Anybody have any idea whether this outstanding warrant would affect her bail in the current case?
My goodness, dears. I wonder what the District Attorney thought about Justin Edwards' post that he, his wife, and Mike Newson were all in court with Oma yesterday morning, that Justin "proved" his identity to all parties and was greeted with open arms and shown the greatest respect by everyone?
Is the DA bursting a gut in uncontrollable laughter or just shaking his head in disbelief?
But, on a serious note, Blake, dear. How very sad that our dear Oma has yet another unresolved legal matter hanging over her. Can the poor darling just not get cut a break from all this harassment by the legal system?
To have had so many judges rule against her in so many cases, to have been tossed in jail so many times, to have had so many police departments consulted by so many victims about her antics must make a lady feel mightily put upon.
We women just have such crosses to bear. We really do, dears.
Look, we know we're just camels, but this stuff would even confuse humans.
Justin/Oma Edwards has been posting on this blog that Alexandra/Oma McConnell/Hamou was never arrested for a felony in San Bernardino, that she did not sit in jail for some weeks, and that she was not sued by a Mrs. Batchelor, despite the fact that official court records say she was.
But on Oma Hamou's forum, her sock puppets are acknolwedging the arrest but arguing that the court records have the wrong physical description of Oma.
So what does she really look like? On the Oma Hamou forum, she is described as a stunningly beautiful blond, 5'8" tall, and fitting nicely into a size 8. In fact, according to her sock puppets, she is so blond that she was enticed into crime by her very blondness. (Heck, not even a camel could come up with that logic.)
Yet the San Bernardino sheriff's and court records say she has brown hair, stands 5'0" short, and weighs 155 pounds. (Even a camel knows that ain't no size 8, unless two of them have been sewn together.)
People who actually saw Oma Hamou in person in an Austin courtroom say it's the San Bernardino records that describe the woman they saw in court. In fact, they said that as she moved about the courtroom, she kept pulling a shawl-like wrap around her frame in an attempt to hide her ample jiggling ass.
Of course, Oma's sock puppets have posted that her attorney (that would be the attorney she did not have for the arrest that was not made for the felony charge that was not filed) is going to have the court records "corrected". We'll keep an eye out for those changes and report back.
Why ever would Ms. Hamou want an erroneous description in arrest records corrected? Does she not realize that having an inaccurate description of her on public file will assist her future endeavors in assuming new identities.
It would be much more convenient -- and considerably more ladylike -- than having to carry around those big sunglasses with the large rubber schnoz and the fake mustache attached.
I understand that Oma is ranting about my Facebook photo. Girlfriend, only an utter idiot would put real photos of herself on the internet, no matter how bubblicious her ass was back in the day. Eventually her ass gets large enough to have its' own zipcode (5'0? 155 lbs.?), and there are all of those pictures still out there of her in bondage, Daisy Dukes, whatever. You know how it is, Oma.
In fact, I created the Facebook account at the suggestion of Mitzi Kedem, dear, as a means of keeping in touch outside of this blog. Calls from Israel are expensive if you are the kind of person who pays her bills.
Not something that bothers your increasingly jowly head.
Anyway, I will replace the picture with something more suitable. I notice you don't have one at all, Oma. Try snapping something using the wide-angle lens.
Rebecca Jordan
Hey Mike Pyles why don't use your real name instead of posting under a woman's. Oh I forgot your the person they say is TONYA HOOCHIE :-)
Oma
NEW RULE. Anything you post that just claims we "are all liars" or "everything is lies" will be deleted instantly.
If you want a post left up, it must have some substance and be specific. ie: This point, x, is a lie...
I'm not letting you waste bandwidth to act like a ten year old girl, with the "you lie, nanananan" games. You have your own website for such drivel.
I'm not angry Oma.
By the way, the burden of proof is on YOU to prove you are "justin". Not the other way around.
"Justin" has gone out of her way to "prove" her "Justinity" to everyone EXCEPT HERE,I wonder why??
as the Church Lady used to say "Isn't that CONVENIENT?"
Oma, darling! I'm on Facebook too, sweetheart! Want to be friends?
Oy, so much stalky-stalk behavior, Oma. Following people around on Facebook and harassing that nice Mr. Moshein's friends? You should be ashamed of youself, although after reading the story of your dealings with Mrs. Batchelor I'm not so sure you are capable of such an emotion. People who have actually spoken with people involved in the case tell a very different story. And honestly, all this tsuris over something that could have been settled months ago when they put you in the hoosegow for six weeks? I don't think you're telling the truth, darling.
Now don't be mean to Rebecca, darling. I'm the one who told her to post a fake picture, sweetheart, and I thought the lady was pretty. I know you've gone blonde because you keep blaming your criminal tendencies on it, darling, but you should think about the woman's hairstyle in the picture Rebecca used. So flattering to a girl of a certain age, I think. It might even make you look taller and . . . well, let's just say less wide and leave it at that.
And why so embarrassed by being short, nafkeh? 5'0 is a little dwarfish, but if you could just lose the saddlebags I don't think people would think you looked all that dumpy. As my Grandma Sadie used to say, find the part of you that's pretty and put it out there. What's working for you these days, Oma? Nitzi did say you had beautiful eyes. How about a nice new set of frames?
Also, how careless the California police must be to get your height and weight wrong so many times? Perhaps they were really looking at Justin? Mr. Moshein said that the real boy is tall enough but maybe a little weedy looking, so it doesn't seem likely that they would mistake him for a short fat middle-aged woman, but you never know.
So exciting!
Mitzi
P.S. Mr. Moshein, I'm a little jealous that Rebecca is your Facebook friend and I am not! Can I send you one of those darling requests and be one of your friends too?
Please do.
Mitzi,
Your story involving Oma's arrest in Victorville is just that a story. It isn't reality. But if you can prove your telling the truth then by all means please publish it. I am certain you can't do this.
Touche'
; )
No, wait.
:(
Damn it!
0.0
Oma, what's the secret code again?
Oma has told me she has no interest in viewing Bob or Rob's profile on facebook. In fact she is certain both Bob and Rob have blocked her from viewing their face book profile. Both Michelle & I as well as others are able to view it with no problem. :-)
Dear Mr. Moshein, while I understand your deleting the Justin/Oma posts that just scream with general invective, I do hope you won't be too fastidious in deleting his/her posts. If you eliminate his/her posts for use of too much profanity, for grammatical and syntactical errors, for poor spelling, and for general incomprehensibility, we'll be too much deprived of the benefits of his/her thoughts -- and of a fertile source for satirical response, too, dear.
Thank you for taking my request under consideration. We do so want to know what's on Justin/Oma's mind, at least when he/she can keep his/her wits about him/her when writing.
Now, that being said --
Justin/Oma, dear. Can you please give us your perspective on why you failed to appear in court on the vehicle code violations? Were you ill again, dear? Another mishap at a ballgame? Was the cancer spreading? Oh, I hope not. It would be a shame to run out of organs too early on, as one simply cannot know how many other court appearances to be avoided lie in your future.
So many prosecutions, so few organs.
I worry for you, dear.
Justin/Oma. Dearest.
I don't mean to be nitpicky, but I really find it rather unsettling that you cannot spell the name of your very bestest friend.
It is Michele (one "l") Biernat, not Michelle, dear.
I think we've rather moved on beyond the chronic "your/you're" confusion, dear, as you just cannot seem to grasp the concept of contractions when writing either as Justin or Oma.
But not to know how to spell the name of a dear friend? Tsk, tsk, dear.
Well, I'm glad to know that "Justin Edwards" and Michele Biernat are stalking me on Facebook...
my how the pots call the kettle black.
and my isnt Biernat just OBSESSED with this blog today. You've been reading it constantly this afternoon...
Oma, darling!
I think the fact that you were referred to as the "defendant" in the case and Mrs. Batchelor as your victim, and that if you don't make full restitution the case will be reopened is pretty much all the "proof" a sane person needs.
Darling, it's like my bubbe used to say, and how wise she was, a lady doesn't have to make up stories if her conduct is what it should be. Every single time something happens to you you blame it on someone else. That Demian guy you married, poor Eliahu, poor Father Markell (and trust me, for me to say "poor" Father Markell is huge, darling, his church wasn't very nice to my people back in the day), the poor caterers, the poor Variety people, the poor American Express company, the poor California Department of Motor Vehicles, poor Tina Vanveen, poor everybody, darling. A lady's life is lived in such a way that she doesn't have to spend her time making up verkackte alibis for every single thing she does.
Like the story about how you were raped because people were incensed by the blogs? The power of the press, darling! Now it turns out that you were apparently just held down and force fed snack cakes.
Who are we to believe, darling? Who are we to believe? Imaginary Justin? Imaginary Sandman (hoo boy, that's all I'm saying)? Imaginary Mike Newson?
Darling, it's confusing.
Mitzi
P,
Go ask Oma yourself that question as I am not Oma and have no desire to answer it. Her email is enigmafilms@aol.com or you can register which I doubt you will and post your question on her forum.
Thank you.
Who said anything about Oma Hamou/McConnell getting arrested in Victorville?
Honestly Rob viewing your Facebook is not stalking my God man get a grip. You won't score any points in court by making this stupid accusation - yes!
Mitzi,
The power of lies, yes, it is true people who Google Oma's name comes upon the web blogs and sites created by both Pallasart and Rob Moshein. These sites publish lies and republish lies that a Judge in Texas slapped a restraining order against one of these web sites. But you all say the things you publish is not a lie. We say it is and how those lies continue to impact my friend's life. As far as the Batchelor woman, my God it was a check for rent, the woman could've went through the legal channels of having Oma evicted rather than arrested.
Justin/Oma, dear. I'm confused.
You have steeped yourself in every tat and tittle of Oma's many arrests, many civil trials, and many prosecutions. You explain, defend, clarify, and excuse endlessly, darling. Why, you even travel from Hawaii to California for things as minor as pre-preliminary conferences to be standing staunchly at her/your side.
Yet now you say you have no desire at all in clarifying the situation around the outstanding bench warrant for her arrest in Los Angeles County?
I must say, dear, this makes no sense at all. One hardly knows what to expect from you.
Dear Oma,
I put up a new Facebook photo. It's not me either!
And Mrs. Biernat, I'm sorry you don't believe that I'm not real, if you understand the word "sorry" to mean "don't care at all". But seriously, girlfriend, you still buy into everything this woman is ladling out? Because if you do, in the immortal words of Jamie Lee Curtis in A Fish Called Wanda, I have dresses smarter than you!
Ciao, as someone always says,
Rebecca Jordan, NOT A FRIEND OF OMA HAMOU
Penny,
I refuse to be further bully by a person who hides behind a false name. I refuse to answer your question and the record when this does go to court will prove that I have on numerous occasions asked you to cease & desist from calling me by my friend's name but your an asshole so you get to say to the cops who will report what you say once Google releases who you really are why you continue to bully and harass me as such.
Thank you.
Rebecca Jordan you are not REBECCA JORDAN you are most likely MIKE PYLES aka VAPORS aka SPARKY aka Grand Duke Sandro aka who some claim you were the person who posted under the name of TONYA HOOCHIE on classmates.com.
Not a Friend of Rebecca Jordan aka the wanna be but drop out cop in North Carolina.
Oma pretending to be "Justin" wrote:
As far as the Batchelor woman, my God it was a check for rent, the woman could've went through the legal channels of having Oma evicted rather than arrested.
OR, Oma could have just PAID THE WOMAN...you know, showed up at her door with a good cashier's check and PAID her, you know??
WHY is it if Oma was so bloody willing to pay Mrs Batchelor, the DA put her wide lardass in JAIL?? WHY did Oma wait ALL THESE MONTHS until the Judge told her Lawyer NO MORE CONTINUANCES that she suddenly agrees to the "civil compromise"??
The answer is obvious, at least if you have a functioning and rational brain...
Bob Atchison the DA wrote a letter about your statement published on this blog. They call you a liar. They say there was no evidence to support your claim Oma had hired anyone lest of all John Lupoli to kill you. This is going to be used against you in court - do you have an attorney lined up?
If I were you and I'm glad I am not I would be scouring for one!
Oh, come on, Oma. No one is forcing you to show up on this blog and whine incessantly about how unfairly you've been treated by the entire world. God knows you have established enough cubbyholes of your own on the internet to do that. So if you aren't going to talk to us, and given the fact that there is no Justin, Mike, Take a Hike, Kyle, Carol or anyone else to talk to, why don't you just go back to the darkness from whence you've sprung, unwept, unhonored and unsung? You have put yourself into the unenviable position of being friendless, jobless and a future that looks mighty bleak. Whereas the real Justin is now employed and making something of himself.
Rebecca Jordan
God Rob is this another one of your billiant legal arguments? Not!
The Batchelor woman agreed to accept a cashiers check after the holiday which proves you published a lie when you wrote Oma spent Thanksgiving in jail. The Batchelor did her own Internet research on Oma and came accross several libelous, defamatory blogs and web sites created by Bob, you & Pallasart that says a lot of things that just isn't true. Just like so many who Google Oma's name and read what you write as being the truth, the woman beleived you guys, after all isn't that the whole purpose of you creating these kind of sites?
Anyhow, a cashiers check was made by a real bank which would've been given to the woman after Thanksgiving. This is a fact that had this gone to trial Oma would've been able to prove to a jury.
Rob what you write about O's attorney is false, libelous and defamatory as I know that attorney would testify that the continuance in the case was due to both him and the DA's office not because of Oma. Yes, the Judge did say no more continuance but not in the way that you make it sound he said Oma had a right to get this over with because of something about Waiver of a Speedy Trial or something to that nature. You Rob post things like Oma had Tina Vanveen arrested because she stole her identity and you called Oma a vindictive bitch. Nothing what you wrote as a matter of fact was true but you wrote it and lots of people belived it. The power of your lies is strong and people react to your words because they believe you are telling the truth and because of these lies it continues to impact my friend's life.
Mike Pyles aka Rebecca Jordan,
Does Citadel know you spend a great deal of your time sitting behind a computer on their time posting crap?
Just wondering...
In the end Rob what you wrote is false, libelous and defamatory about Oma and about her attorney and your interpetation of what was said in court just a few days ago. Does it make you feel good to always comment on Oma's weight? How do you know Oma has a large ass as you keep ranting about? How many years has it been since you saw her in court? I thought so. I wonder what jurors will think of you when they read what you write about a woman's weight and the lies you write about Oma just because you don't like her. Btw, my bet is that the BILL OR REVIEW won't get denied while your belief is that it will. Who will be right me or you?
Rob will, assuming that she gets off her large ass and tries to file.
How are you going to post the $23,000 bond to file for the Bill of Review, Justin/Oma? You do realize the court won't take a personal check, don't you?
And what's all this about the Batchelor woman having you/her arrested? Didn't you post just yesterday that there was no claim made against you/Oma by any Batchelor woman? And that you/Oma were not arrested?
Good grief, woman, can't you keep a story straight for five minutes?
Well, then,
Since Oma has such a clear cut case of her innocence, that valid check she "would have paid" after the "holiday", then WHY not just go to trial and have her INNOCENCE PROVEN PUBLICLY??
WHY all the delays? She has a right to a speedy trial (that's in the Constitution) so why didn't she just stand up in Court and tell her story to the Judge or Jury?
I mean, if I were totally innocent and had the proof to back it up, I'd be glad to even take the stand in my own defense.
So????
Oma,
Do you seriously think that you presented a credible timeline of the Batchelor case? This is not how it played out, girlfriend, but fortunately anyone interested doesn't have to take you or Penelope's word for it, they can simply check the posted legal records. They clearly show that you were in jail, and that you agreed to settle the case seven months after the turn of the year. Perhaps Mrs. Batchelor was so afraid of you that she went into hiding and you could not bring her the money order? And girlfriend, cash is also always acceptable.
Rebecca Jordan
Oh, and OMA CAN'T come to Texas and file anything. She has that pesky little FELONY CHARGE outstanding, and the bail bonds guys and the Court really get kind of annoyed when Felony Defendants leave the state....
"Justin Edwards" do the people who employ you at that "kickass" job you say you have know you spend all day on the internet writing crap, making threats and using vulgar language??
Rob you know what dude your conclusions are wrong and I am not going to argue it here on your blog. You and Bob who called Oma a con artist and on trial for forgery can take that up in the next round of litigation when she sues Pallasart & him and when criminal charges are finally pressed against these two different entities.
Remember whatever you publish on this blog you Rob are responsible in making certain it is the truth.
Touche'
By the time Oma travels to Texas there will be no felony charge against her and her bail will be whatever they do with it and the end of a case. Thank you very much.
Justin Edwards alias Oma Hamou alias Alexandra Murphy alias Alexandra O'Connell alias Oma Louise McConnell alias Mike Newson alias Sandman alias Snoopy alias . . . gee, it takes a lot longer to do this to you than most people.
Thank you very much! Touche! Ciao, monkey!
And I'm curious about that crackerjack job as well that you claim Justin Edwards has. What kind of job requires a functional illiterate?
Rebecca Jordan alias Rebecca Jordan
I have a question, is it true that Mike Pyles was the person who posted on classmates.com as Tonya Hoochie? That's what has been told, is it true? I know from his IP registered on Oma's old forum under GDUKESANDRO that it matched the same Chicago IP the cops had on him. If it is true, my next question why did he do this?
And I think you're wrong. There will always be a felony charge connected to your name, Oma.
Rebecca Jordan aka Mike Pyles,
Mike Newson is Mike Newson and in fact he has published recent stuff on Oma's forum. I know Bob has his phone number why don't you call him since you are publicly on this forum accusing Oma of being him. Ask him if he is the one posting and created Oma's web forum etc.
As to Sandman, hmmmm, that guy lives in Austin Texas and is a friend of Anastasia Davis, remember her? You did at one time believe she was Oma.
As to my identity well I am Justin Edwards and am very proud to call Oma as my friend.
Hey, remember when you said Alan Plotkin was never a t.v. producer on that show well, I proved you wrong on O's forum, in fact Mike, I have proven you wrong on so many other things you said was true about Oma.
Touche'
Rebecca aka Mike Pyles,
No there won't be always a felony charge connected to Oma's name. ;)
This is somewhat confusing, Justin/Oma dear. There are earlier felony convictions already on the record in several states on you/Oma. Are those going to miraculously disappear?
I'm speaking in practical terms here, of course, dear. I suppose a sufficient passage of time (centuries, perhaps) will eventually erase all criminal records everywhere.
I do fear, Justin/Oma dear, that none of us will still be around to witness it, however, mortal as we all are.
P.S. I post under the screen name SNOOPY on Oma's forum and have done this for God I don't know a long time. I also made it known on that forum that I was Justin Edwards, bo biggie.
And as for Oma getting utilities in the name of Alexandra Murphy well, it is for the very reason you idiots posted on this blog, because she didn't want you to find her.
As far as she is concerned your a stalker and a danger and she didn't want some crazed psycho you may send over to her home fuck her up as Bob threatened to do to Penny Wilson.
So see you all proved you've been looking for her by your mornoic posts all of which I and Mike Newson have the pleasue of uploading into the Timeline for court to prove your stalkers. :-)
Penny,
Let me educate you since you think you are fabolously correct -NOT!
A person has a right to have all of their criminal records expunged if there is no other criminal convictions. Need I say more? No.
Earth minions, my curiosity is getting the better of me. Of me, who knows all.
Who is this Mike Pyles, who has also been Tonya Hoochie, and GDSandro, and Vapors, and Sparky, and Rebecca Jordan?
Thank you so much for the education, Justin/Oma, dear.
However, I remain somewhat befuddled. Since there were convictions after at least your/her first two felony convictions years ago, those first two convictions can, by the rule you yourself pointed out, not be expunged.
So then, how can your/her felony conviction record be made completely to disappear, dear?
(And dear, that last post was a mess, gramatically speaking. Mispelled words. Mismatches in number between subjects and verbs. I hope you're not about to slip into one of your/her stretches of incoherent posts, for then dear Mr. Moshein might start deleting them, and we would all be deprived of your/her insights.)
I think that actually works with parking tickets, Oma, not felonies. But whatever. As Penelope says, centuries will pass and still your misdeeds will haunt the world. So you see? You've accomplished your goal. Not through the porn, not through the movie, not through the restoration of imperial palaces. But through your criminal activity. Your name will be immortal! Your record will be the gold standard for aspiring con artists!
Your spelling has begun to deteriorate even more quickly than usual, by the way.
Anyway, I am off to research Mr. Plotkin. His name appeared in the Chicago Dossier, but I paid it no never mind. You certainly do provide a lot of personal information for someone who craves privacy. What was his connection with the traveling circus that has been your life?
Rebecca Jordan alias Rebecca Jordan
I thought Rob Moshein was Tonya Hoochie? Mitzi is right. This is confusing.
Penny,
I don't understand your post. Oma has a right as does any person who has been convicted of a crime to have her criminal record expunged. The three felony convictions appearing on her record per the DOJ is more than 10 years old.
Please educate me since you seem to believe my friend doesn't have the right to have her record expunged so we can use it in court against Pallasart.
Rebecca Jordan aka Mike Pyles,
How did the cops in OC describe you, um, let's see you are a person who was what over zealous to nail my friend. In the end they told you to get lost.
Touche'
No, according to some it was not Rob Moshein who posted under the name of Tonya Hoochie but the guy from Chicago who posts on this blog as Rebecca Jordan no other than MIKE PYLES a wealthy man whose life partner used to be or is a priest.
But, Justin/Oma dear, if those convictions are ever so old, why have you/she not long ago had them expunged? If you had, Mr. Moshein would never have come across them, don't you see, dear?
Where are your priorities, dear?
Penny,
Oma has told me up until Bob Atchison and his web company created a web site about her life and re-wrote it, she had no reason to do this. She did say she applied for a Governor's Pardon back in the early 90's and it was denied because she didn't do it right. Today in the present moment she has several attorneys in the three different states who have been paid and are assisting her in this process.
Wealth? A priest? The investigation of a mystery?
Illuminati, are you listening? This sounds like your cup of tea. Very Da Vinci Code
You can have a leave of absence from investigating those renegade nuns over on MySpace if you're game for this task.
I have NEVER ever used the name Tanya Hoochie for anything ever. I said so under oath (during discovery in litigation you dimwitted moron)
I've told you repeatedly I KNOW who used that name, and it is a FEMALE, and NOT Mike Pyles, a MALE from what I understand....
My goodness, Justin/Oma dear. I don't believe I've ever met anyone who has so many lawyers pressed into service over so many issues all at once. The Mensa team who have been working for years now on the great lawsuit against Messrs. Atchison. Your attorney in Victorville handling the current felony matter. The team of attorneys in Texas who are preparing your/her briefs for the great Bill of Review maneuver. And now attorneys spread across three states working diligently to have a multi-state criminal history expunged. And all pre-paid, as well.
How I envy you your vast resources, dear. To have this massive legal staff at your disposal must be a great comfort.
Perhaps you could assist Mr. Watson in finding an office with covered parking, though, dear. Those pickup trucks and vans parked out front can get so hot in that California desert sun. I'm sure he would appreciate the gesture -- once his bill is paid, of course.
I assume Rob you are calling me not Oma a dim witted moron?
Your such an impossible cad that is what Peter Kurth called you?
What I heard was Mike Pyles was Tonya Hoochie - o.k. you say he isn't.
Care to share with all of us who that MALE person is or could it be that that person is someone close to you? ;)
Sorry Oma, but the Utah Felony conviction doesn't qualify, so THAT one will have to remain.
You are eligible for expungement of conviction if the following conditions are met:
* You have no more than one felony or two class A or B misdemeanor convictions.
* You have been released from incarceration, parole, or probation for the specified amount of time.
* You have satisfied all fines and restitution ordered as part of the sentence.
To get an expungment, you must seek and receive a certificate of Eligibility for Expungement from the Utah State Bureau of Criminal Identification. Some factors that may result in denial of this certificate are:
* Three or more convictions (for a felony, or class A or class B misdemeanors), not stemming from a single arrest.
see: http://www.utcourts.gov/howto/expunge/
OOOPS, you have THREE Felony convictions. Sorry.....
Penny,
Why do you make fun of Oma's attorney, I mean what right do you a person who is hiding behind a false name so that he/she can harass, stalk and bully me because I defend my friend. Mr. Watson's is one of the best well known criminal defense attorneys in San Bernadino in fact he well respected in the court rooms throughout San Bernadino and yet you a NOBODY JUST a CYBER BULLY (thanks btw for proving our point) continues to poke fun of the fact that maybe his offices isn't up to par to your taste.
So Oma has hired attorneys, so, that is her perrogative.
Rob take your legal advice and stuff it where the sun doesn't shine.
Obviously Oma's attorney there in Utah knows what the hell he is doing.
But see Rob you prove our point on so many different levels....
Hmm, Nope no expunging the Montana Felony either, sorry Oma:
FELONY ADULT CRIMINAL SENTENCING
Presented by
Diana Koch
Chief Legal Counsel
Montana Department of Corrections
Absent explicit authorization from the legislature, a court has no
power to expunge criminal records. State v. Chesley, 2004 MT
165, ¶1
see:http://mt.gov.cdc.nicusa.com/search?q=cache:mjm1B0Pvx-sJ:publicdefender.mt.gov/training/sentencingoutline.pdf+expunge+felony&access=p&output=xml_no_dtd&ie=UTF-8&client=mtgov&site=mtgov&proxystylesheet=mtgov&oe=UTF-8
Oh, dear, where to begin to correct the spelling and errors in that post, dear.
Let's just say that it's "prerogative" and not "perrogative" and leave it at that.
You seem to be in no state right now to accept any coaching about how to write with even a modicum of eloquence, Justin/Oma dear.
Again Rob I am certain Oma's attorney in Helena Montana knows what the hell SHE is doing with respect to Oma's criminal conviction within that state.
Thanks,
And the state of Wyoming I am certain Oma's attorney knows what the hell HE is doing with respect to Oma's criminal conviction in that state.
OOOPS no expunging for FELONY convictions in Wyoming either. Only for misdemeanors and arrests that don't end up in a conviction.
Sorry Oma....
Yes, Oma,
We know you've had ALL those attorneys for ALL these years busy working away,
But, see, IF you have ALL that cash to burn on lawyers, WHY are you not paying off the DEBTS you owe and WRITING MORE BAD CHECKS??
Rob there is no oops Oma has retained attorneys in these different states to assist her with either getting these criminal convictions expunged or whatever their going to do. I hope Oma gets this off of her record before she goes to trial with Pallasart and Bob Atchison on both the civil and criminal procceding against Pallasart and Bob Atchison.
That would be way too cool.
Touche'
Rob Oma isn't posting so if you don't stop calling me Oma I will stop posting. You are an asshole a genuine stalker, a person who publishes lies, like the bit about Oma having Tina arrested for stealing her identity. You took thew word of someone without verifying the facts as USUAL and posted something as fact. How many times have you done this and you have the balls to call yourself an attorney whose retired.
My God man you are pretty messed up!
yes yes yes, We know Oma. We know.
ALL these attorneys have been working away for ALL these years now.
We've heard it all before Oma, time and time and time again.
So, PROVE it by naming the attorneys in all those states, I'll be glad to call and confirm.
Oh, you CAN'T. You never do. The ONLY time you cough up names is when the lawyer is actually REAL....
and *snicker* I bet the University of La Verne would qualify as the best criminal lawyer education in Victorville...
Oma you couldn't stop posting here if you LIFE or FREEDOM depended on it.
You are too obsessed. You can't stop yourself. You've been tapping away in the dark on that computer keyboard all day and into the late night for YEARS now.
You've burned through THREE forums, you're so obsessed.
You're sociopathic too, you almost believe the sockpuppets you make up and the garbage you write under their names.
I double, nay triple dog dare you,Oma to STOP posting...
You can't.
So you can call and send letters to them like you did to the DA and Oma's attorney and lie about her. All of this is gonna be used against you cause you've been doing this since 2003 and back then Oma had an attorney. Why even Bob Atchison tried his damnest to convey to Dave Slater Oma didn't pay bills and when Dave didn't listen to him Bob yelled at him to the point that Dave hung up the phone on him. Yes, Rob, yes we know what you will do and won't be to confirm anything, it will be to tell your story to these different attorneys in the hope they won't assist Oma.
This is your proven MO.
Touche'
Btw, I am going to post Dave Slater's email that says you never revealed who WAS TONYA HOOCHIE.
That makes you a liar.
Post a Comment