As there is little Law Enforcement can do to assist me at this time, I can only defend myself here. If Oma Hamou and whatever cronies she may have had just left me alone, there would not have been a need for this blog.
Credibility, as she said, is the key. So judge the woman accusing me for her credibility:
She has THREE felony convictions for fraud, she wrote bad checks.
She was arrested three times as a FELONY FUGITIVE FROM JUSTICE for failing to live up to the terms of her probation for those felonies.
She is CURRENTLY facing trial for FELONY FORGERY Case FVI802540 Defendant 3045972 MCCONNELL, ALEXANDRA OMA in San Bernardino County. Detail are in the most recently previous blog or you can go here http://www.sbcounty.gov/courts/genInfo/openaccess.htm
and read the entire minute orders for the hearings to date on this Felony Crime Charge, as recently as yesterday.
Oma Hamou aka Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Murphy et al has spent about an entire YEAR of her life sitting in jail over the course of her life. Most recently in Victorville California for some six weeks in last November and December. Ask her how she enjoyed her 2008 Thanksgiving Dinner in jail.
This woman has accumulated debt on the public record of nearly one million dollars. This public information is out on the internet and easily found.
This woman lies. Just last night she said that her attorney told her I had spoken to the DA prosecuting her felony Forgery charge and she "knew all about it". This was a bald faced lie. I have never spoken to the DA.
She says "law enforcement" have "told her" things about me. These statements are a bald faced and deliberate lie. I can go on an on, you can read all the previous blog posts I have put up if you want the details.
Now this woman through her old boyfriend Jim Sproul of Northridge California (who by his own admission has given Oma Hamou aka Alexandra McConnell et al OVER ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS AS A GIFT. ARE YOU LISTENING INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE??) now says
"TRUTH
According to the San Bernadino's District Attorney's office Oma Hamou is not on trial for felony forgery."
HERE IS THE TRUTH, STRAIGHT FROM THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY COURT, YOU CAN SEE THAT OMA HAMOU'S STATEMENT SHE IS NOT ON TRIAL FOR FELONY FORGERY IS A BALD FACED AND DELIBERATE LIE MEANT ONLY TO DECEIVE:
Case FVI802540 - Defendants
Seq Defendant Next Court Date Status Agency /
DR Number Arrest Date Count 1 Charge Violation Date
1 MCCONNELL, ALEXANDRA OMA PRE-PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE
07/28/2009 AT 8:30 AM DEPT. V6 ACTIVE SH
070805054 11/07/2008 PC 476 11/07/2008
- Status
Custody Bail
Filing Type Complaint Filing Date 12/02/2008
Ordered Bail $0.00 Posted Bail $0.00
D.A. BRYAN STODGHILL Defense BRIAN WATSON-RETAINED
Next Action: PRE-PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE
07/28/2009 AT 8:30 AM DEPT. V6 Deputy Report #: SH-04 070805054
Warrant Type Status Issued Affidavit
NONE N/A N/A
Probation Type Granted Expiration
N/A N/A N/A
Sentence Convicted Date County Jail CTS
N/A N/A N/A
State Prison Max Sentence
N/A N/A
Fine and Penalty Restitution Fine Restitution to Victim
0 N/A
- Charges
Arrest Charges
Count Charge Severity Description Violation Date Plea Status
1 PC 476 F MAKING, POSSESSING, UTTERING FICTIOUS INSTRS 11/07/2008
Filed Charges
Count Charge Severity Description Violation Date Plea Status
1 PC 476 F MAKING, POSSESSING, UTTERING FICTIOUS INSTRS 11/07/2008 ACTIVE
- Probation
Probation Has Not Been Granted On This Case For This Defendant.
- Related Cases On Calendar
Related Cases On Calendar
This Defendant Does Not Have Any Other Cases With Future Hearings Scheduled.
- All Defendant's Cases
Case Number Filed Date Charges Next Hearing Jurisdiction
This Defendant Does Not Have Any Other Reportable Cases.
- Actions and Minutes
Action Date Action Text Disposition Hearing Type
07/30/2009 9:00 AM DEPT. V6 PRELIMINARY HEARING ACTIVE
07/28/2009 8:30 AM DEPT. V6 PRE-PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE ACTIVE TRC
07/16/2009 9:00 AM DEPT. V6 PRELIMINARY HEARING VACATED
07/14/2009 8:30 AM DEPT. V6 PRE-PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE DISPOSED TRC
Minutes
LARRY W ALLEN
CLERK: LF-LORI FLORES
CERTIFIED COURT REPORTER: BR-BARBIE ROELLE CSR# BR-5376
DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY BRYAN STODGHILL PRESENT.
ATTORNEY BRIAN WATSON-RETAINED PRESENT.
DEFENDANT PRESENT.
-
PROCEEDINGS
ACTION CAME ON FOR PRE-PRELIMINARY HEARING
-
DEFENSE MOTION TO CONTINUE IS GRANTED.
-
HEARINGS
PRELIMINARY HEARING SET ON 07/16/2009 VACATED.
PRE-PRELIMINARY HEARING SET FOR 07/28/2009 AT 8:30 IN DEPARTMENT V6.
PRELIMINARY HEARING SET ON 07/30/2009 AT 9:00 IN DEPARTMENT V6.
DEFENDANT ORDERED TO APPEAR ON HEARING DATE.
-
TIME WAIVERS
TIME WAIVER PREVIOUSLY GIVEN.
-
CUSTODY STATUS
CURRENT BAIL BOND CONTINUED.
CASE CUSTODY - BAIL BOND
============= MINUTE ORDER END ================
06/11/2009 9:00 AM DEPT. V6 PRELIMINARY HEARING DISPOSED
Minutes
JOHN M TOMBERLIN
CLERK: LF-LORI FLORES
CERTIFIED COURT REPORTER: FM-FRANCES MACIAS CSR# FM-10918
DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY CECILIA JOO PRESENT.
DEPUTY PUBLIC DEFENDER 9 PRESENT
ATTORNEY BRIAN WATSON-RETAINED PRESENT.
DEFENDANT PRESENT.
-
PROCEEDINGS
ACTION CAME ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
-
STIPULATED MOTION TO CONTINUE IS GRANTED.
-
HEARINGS
PRE-PRELIMINARY HEARING SET FOR 07/14/2009 AT 8:30 IN DEPARTMENT V6.
PRELIMINARY HEARING SET ON 07/16/2009 AT 9:00 IN DEPARTMENT V6.
DEFENDANT ORDERED TO APPEAR ON HEARING DATE.
-
TIME WAIVERS
DEFENDANT WAIVES HIS/HER RIGHT TO A PRELIMINARY HEARING WITHIN 10 COURT DAYS AND 60 CALENDAR DAYS UNDER PC859B AND 60 DAYS BEYOND 07/16/2009.
-
CUSTODY STATUS
CURRENT BAIL BOND CONTINUED.
CASE CUSTODY - BAIL BOND
============= MINUTE ORDER END ================
06/09/2009 8:30 AM DEPT. V6 PRE-PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE DISPOSED TRC
Minutes
LARRY W ALLEN
CLERK: B6021-LINNEA RIVERA
CERTIFIED COURT REPORTER: CM-CHRISTIE MATHES CSR# CM-6221
DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY JASON WILKENSON PRESENT.
SPECIAL APPEARANCE BY ATTORNEY BRANDON WOOD FOR ATTORNEY BRIAN WATSON.
DEFENDANT PRESENT.
-
PROCEEDINGS
ACTION CAME ON FOR PRE-PRELIMINARY HEARING
-
PARTIES ANNOUNCE READY FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING.
-
HEARINGS
PRELIMINARY HEARING CONFIRMED.
(06/11/09)
ESTIMATED TIME IS 45 MINUTES.
DEFENDANT ORDERED TO APPEAR ON HEARING DATE.
-
CUSTODY STATUS
CASE CUSTODY - BAIL BOND
CURRENT BAIL BOND CONTINUED.
============= MINUTE ORDER END ================
05/13/2009 9:00 AM DEPT. V6 PRELIMINARY HEARING DISPOSED
Minutes
LARRY W ALLEN
CLERK: LF-LORI FLORES
CERTIFIED COURT REPORTER: CM-CHRISTIE MATHES CSR# CM-6221
DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY BRYAN STODGHILL PRESENT.
ATTORNEY BRIAN WATSON-RETAINED PRESENT.
DEFENDANT PRESENT.
-
PROCEEDINGS
ACTION CAME ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
-
STIPULATED MOTION TO CONTINUE IS GRANTED.
-
HEARINGS
PRE-PRELIMINARY HEARING SET FOR 06/09/2009 AT 8:30 IN DEPARTMENT V6.
PRELIMINARY HEARING SET ON 06/11/2009 AT 9:00 IN DEPARTMENT V6.
DEFENDANT ORDERED TO APPEAR ON HEARING DATE.
-
TIME WAIVERS
DEFENDANT WAIVES HIS/HER RIGHT TO A PRELIMINARY HEARING WITHIN 10 COURT DAYS AND 60 CALENDAR DAYS UNDER PC859B AND 60 DAYS BEYOND 06/11/2009.
-
CUSTODY STATUS
CURRENT BAIL BOND CONTINUED.
CASE CUSTODY - BAIL BOND
============= MINUTE ORDER END ================
05/11/2009 8:30 AM DEPT. V6 PRE-PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE DISPOSED TRC
Minutes
LARRY W ALLEN
CLERK: JL-JACKIE LAWRENCE
CERTIFIED COURT REPORTER: CM-CHRISTIE MATHES CSR# CM-6221
DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY JAMES HILL PRESENT.
ATTORNEY BRIAN WATSON RETAINED.
DEFENDANT PRESENT.
-
PROCEEDINGS
ACTION CAME ON FOR PRE-PRELIMINARY HEARING
-
OFF RECORD, COURT AND COUNSEL CONFER IN CHAMBERS
-
PARTIES ANNOUNCE READY FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING.
-
HEARINGS
PRELIMINARY HEARING CONFIRMED.
FOR 05/13/09
ESTIMATED TIME IS ONE HOUR 30 MINUTES.
DEFENDANT ORDERED TO APPEAR ON HEARING DATE.
-
CUSTODY STATUS
CASE CUSTODY - BAIL BOND
============= MINUTE ORDER END ================
04/30/2009 9:00 AM DEPT. V6 PRELIMINARY HEARING VACATED
04/28/2009 8:30 AM DEPT. V6 PRE-PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE DISPOSED TRC
Minutes
LARRY W ALLEN
CLERK: LF-LORI FLORES
CERTIFIED COURT REPORTER: CM-CHRISTIE MATHES CSR# CM-6221
DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY CECILIA JOO PRESENT.
ATTORNEY BRIAN WATSON - RETAINED PRESENT.
DEFENDANT PRESENT.
-
PROCEEDINGS
ACTION CAME ON FOR PRE-PRELIMINARY HEARING
-
PEOPLES MOTION TO CONTINUE IS GRANTED.
-
HEARINGS
PRELIMINARY HEARING SET ON 04/30/2009 VACATED.
PRE-PRELIMINARY HEARING SET FOR 05/11/2009 AT 8:30 IN DEPARTMENT V6.
PRELIMINARY HEARING SET ON 05/13/2009 AT 9:00 IN DEPARTMENT V6.
DEFENDANT ORDERED TO APPEAR ON HEARING DATE.
-
TIME WAIVERS
TIME WAIVER PREVIOUSLY GIVEN.
-
CUSTODY STATUS
CURRENT BAIL BOND CONTINUED.
CASE CUSTODY - BAIL BOND
============= MINUTE ORDER END ================
02/26/2009 9:00 AM DEPT. V6 PRELIMINARY HEARING DISPOSED
Minutes
LARRY W ALLEN
CLERK: LF-LORI FLORES
CERTIFIED COURT REPORTER: CM-CHRISTIE MATHES CSR# CM-6221
DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY CARRIE HALGRIMSON PRESENT.
ATTORNEY BRIAN WATSON PRESENT.
DEFENDANT PRESENT.
-
PROCEEDINGS
ACTION CAME ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
-
PEOPLES MOTION TO CONTINUE (FURTHER INVESTIGATION) IS GRANTED.
-
HEARINGS
PRE-PRELIMINARY HEARING SET FOR 04/28/2009 AT 8:30 IN DEPARTMENT V6.
PRELIMINARY HEARING SET ON 04/30/2009 AT 9:00 IN DEPARTMENT V6.
DEFENDANT ORDERED TO APPEAR ON HEARING DATE.
-
TIME WAIVERS
DEFENDANT WAIVES HIS/HER RIGHT TO A PRELIMINARY HEARING WITHIN 10 COURT DAYS AND 60 CALENDAR DAYS UNDER PC859B AND 60 DAYS BEYOND 04/30/2009.
-
CUSTODY STATUS
CURRENT BAIL BOND CONTINUED.
CASE CUSTODY - BAIL BOND
============= MINUTE ORDER END ================
02/24/2009 8:30 AM DEPT. V6 PRE-PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE DISPOSED TRC
Minutes
LARRY W ALLEN
CLERK: SJ1-SHIRLEY JAUREGUI
CERTIFIED COURT REPORTER: CM-CHRISTIE MATHES CSR# CM-6221
DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY TIM HASKELL PRESENT.
ATTORNEY BRIAN WATSON PRESENT.
DEFENDANT PRESENT NOT IN CUSTODY.
-
PROCEEDINGS
ACTION CAME ON FOR PRE-PRELIMINARY HEARING
PARTIES ANNOUNCE READY FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING.
ADDITIONAL DISCOVERY GIVEN TO DEFENSE COUNSEL
-
HEARINGS
PRELIMINARY HEARING CONFIRMED.
SET ON 02/26/09
DEFENDANT ORDERED TO APPEAR ON HEARING DATE.
-
ESTIMATED TIME IS 2-1/2 HOURS.
-
CUSTODY STATUS
CASE CUSTODY - BAIL BOND
CURRENT BAIL BOND CONTINUED.
============= MINUTE ORDER END ================
01/26/2009 9:00 AM DEPT. V6 PRELIMINARY HEARING VACATED
01/21/2009 8:30 AM DEPT. V6 PRE-PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE DISPOSED TRC
Minutes
LARRY W ALLEN
CLERK: LAS-LUCY SCHNEIDER
CERTIFIED COURT REPORTER: CM-CHRISTIE MATHES CSR# CM-6221
DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY ROBIN HASS PRESENT.
ATTORNEY BRIAN WATSON PRESENT.
DEFENDANT PRESENT.
-
PROCEEDINGS
ACTION CAME ON FOR PRE-PRELIMINARY HEARING
PRELIMINARY HEARING SET ON 01/26/2009 VACATED.
-
HEARINGS
PRE-PRELIMINARY HEARING SET FOR 02/24/2009 AT 8:30 IN DEPARTMENT V6.
PRELIMINARY HEARING SET ON 02/26/2009 AT 9:00 IN DEPARTMENT V6.
DEFENDANT WAIVES HIS/HER RIGHT TO A PRELIMINARY HEARING WITHIN 10 COURT DAYS AND 60 CALENDAR DAYS UNDER PC859B AND 60 DAYS BEYOND 02/26/2009.
DEFENDANT ORDERED TO APPEAR ON HEARING DATE.
-
CUSTODY STATUS
CASE CUSTODY - BAIL BOND
-
DEF REQ CONT FOR ADDITIONAL INVESTIGATION
============= MINUTE ORDER END ================
12/18/2008 9:00 AM DEPT. V6 PRELIMINARY HEARING VACATED
12/16/2008 8:30 AM DEPT. V6 PRE-PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE DISPOSED TRC
Minutes
ANNEMARIE G PACE
CLERK: JL-JACKIE LAWRENCE
CERTIFIED COURT REPORTER: LH1-LEISHA HENDRIX CSR# LH1-11680
DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY ROBIN HASS PRESENT.
ATTORNEY BRIAN WATSON RETAINED.
DEFENDANT PRESENT IN CUSTODY.
-
PROCEEDINGS
ACTION CAME ON FOR PRE-PRELIMINARY HEARING
-
MOTIONS
PARTIES MOTION TO CONTINUE MATTER IS GRANTED.
-
HEARINGS
PRELIMINARY HEARING SET ON 12/18/2008 VACATED.
-
PRE-PRELIMINARY HEARING SET FOR 01/21/2009 AT 8:30 IN DEPARTMENT V6.
PRELIMINARY HEARING SET ON 01/26/2009 AT 9:00 IN DEPARTMENT V6.
DEFENDANT ORDERED TO APPEAR ON HEARING DATE.
-
TIME WAIVERS
DEFENDANT WAIVES HIS/HER RIGHT TO A PRELIMINARY HEARING WITHIN 10 COURT DAYS AND 60 CALENDAR DAYS UNDER PC859B AND 60 DAYS BEYOND 01/26/2009.
-
CUSTODY STATUS
CASE CUSTODY - IN CUSTODY
============= MINUTE ORDER END ================
12/15/2008 BOND PC3000779334 POSTED FOR 25000.00
12/11/2008 9:00 AM DEPT. V6 PRELIMINARY HEARING VACATED
12/09/2008 8:30 AM DEPT. V6 PRE-PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE DISPOSED TRC
Minutes
ANNEMARIE G PACE
CLERK: JL-JACKIE LAWRENCE
MINUTES UPDATED BY SDA-SHERYL ANDRADE
CERTIFIED COURT REPORTER: LH1-LEISHA HENDRIX CSR# LH1-11680
DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAVID FOY PRESENT.
ATTORNEY BRIAN WATSON PRESENT.
DEFENDANT PRESENT IN CUSTODY.
-
PROCEEDINGS
ACTION CAME ON FOR PRE-PRELIMINARY HEARING
OFF THE RECORD, COURT AND COUNSEL CONFER IN CHAMBERS
DEFENSES ORAL MOTION REQUESTING REDUCTION IN BAIL IS GRANTED.
-
DEFENSES ORAL MOTION REQUESTING A CONTINUANCE IS GRANTED.
PRELIMINARY HEARING SET ON 12/11/2008 VACATED.
-
HEARINGS
PRE-PRELIMINARY HEARING SET FOR 12/16/2008 AT 8:30 IN DEPARTMENT V6.
PRELIMINARY HEARING SET ON 12/18/2008 AT 9:00 IN DEPARTMENT V6.
DEFENDANT ORDERED TO APPEAR ON HEARING DATE.
-
CUSTODY STATUS
BAIL REDUCED TO $25000.00.
CASE CUSTODY - IN CUSTODY
COMMITMENT ISSUED (PENDING)
============= MINUTE ORDER END ================
12/03/2008 1:30 PM DEPT. V6A IN CUSTODY ARRAIGNMENT DISPOSED ARRAIGNMENT
Minutes
ANNEMARIE G PACE
CLERK: SDA-SHERYL ANDRADE
CERTIFIED COURT REPORTER: LH1-LEISHA HENDRIX CSR# LH1-11680
ATTORNEY BRIAN WATSON PRESENT.
DEFENDANT PRESENT IN CUSTODY.
-
PROCEEDINGS
ACTION CAME ON FOR ARRAIGNMENT
DEFENDANT ARRAIGNED.
DEFENDANT IS ADVISED OF CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY RIGHTS. (AS ATTACHED AND INCORPORATED)
-
PLEA INFORMATION
DEFENDANT PLEADS NOT GUILTY TO ALL COUNTS.
-
DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR RELEASE ON OWN RECOGNIZANCE IS DENIED.
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
-
ATTORNEY INFORMATION
ATTORNEY BRIAN WATSON RETAINED.
COPY OF COMPLAINT AND DISCOVERY GIVEN TO DEFENSE COUNSEL.
-
HEARINGS
PRE-PRELIMINARY HEARING SET FOR 12/09/2008 AT 8:30 IN DEPARTMENT V6.
AND BAIL/OR HEARING
PRELIMINARY HEARING SET ON 12/11/2008 AT 9:00 IN DEPARTMENT V6.
DEFENDANT ORDERED TO APPEAR ON HEARING DATE.
-
CUSTODY STATUS
CASE CUSTODY - IN CUSTODY
BAIL SET AT $1000000.00.
COMMITMENT ISSUED (PENDING)
ATTORNEY NOTIFIED.
DISTRICT ATTORNEY NOTIFIED.
============= MINUTE ORDER END ================
12/02/2008 1:30 PM DEPT. V14 IN CUSTODY ARRAIGNMENT DISPOSED ARRAIGNMENT
Minutes
PATRICK L SINGER
CLERK: MC1-MARYANN CHAVEZ
-
PROCEEDINGS
ACTION CAME ON FOR ARRAIGNMENT
MOTIONS
ON COURT'S OWN MOTION-CASE OFF CALENDAR.
DEFENDANT REFUSED VIDEO ARRAIGNMENT
-
CUSTODY STATUS
CASE CUSTODY - IN CUSTODY
============= MINUTE ORDER END ================
12/02/2008 JURISDICTION SET TO VS BY OTS310.
12/02/2008 COMPLAINT FILED BY RSMIT
- Fine Information
Date To Pay: N/A First Payment:
Prior NSF: N Payment Amount: $0.00 Last Payment:
Fine Number Fine Type Fine Description Original Amount Paid To Date Current Due
Total: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Yes, judge for yourself if this woman who wants to destroy my reputation in the public seems credible to you.
302 comments:
1 – 200 of 302 Newer› Newest»Oma/Justin et al Same rules apply to the new blog as previous ones...
Oh, dear. Poor Tina Vanveen's initial bail in Los Angeles County has been set at $50,000. Of course, that's a mite better than the initial bail of $1 million Oma Hamou was held under for six weeks on her current felony charge.
Of course, poor Tina always shows up in police and court records as just plain old Tina Vanveen in and around Los Angeles, so she's a little easier to keep tabs on -- nothing like the multi-state alias history of our intrepid Madame Hamou, who has been known as Alexandra Oma McConnell (her current arrest alias), Alexandra Murphy, Oma Hamou, Oma Chedid, Oma Ashkenazy, Rebecca E. Jordan, Jordan Taylor, Rebecca Abramou, Oma Ashkenazy Demian, Oma Matin, Oma Louise McConnell, and Justin Edwards (one of her current internet posting noms de plume).
Oh, my. Have I missed any? Perhaps, but there are only so many names a lady can keep in her head along with all the details of her busy social calendar.
As for that little business about some Tonya Hoochie in which Ms. Hamou puts so much stock -- it should be pointed out that no court order said any such thing as that Mr. Moshein used any such name. The court order simply said that no one posting as Tonya Hoochie could say anything about Ms. Hamou and her rather interesting activities and business fronts. As Mr. Moshein was not Tonya Hoochie, he had no reason to spend any resources on challenging said order.
Here's some alarming news. Someone is reading this blog from the law offices of a Mark D. Pastor in Encino.
Wow! Someone in a tax attorney's office (you know, where things like clients' tax returns and social security numbers float around) following a blog about a known identity thief.
What are the chances this is a coincidence?
Daaaamn. I've been taking notes for the new version of my movie script so fast that my fingers are numb.
Is someone going to call Mr. Pastor and ask what's going on or should I?
Either way, let me know.
Oh shit, Mr. Pastor does MY taxes! Do you think Justin Oma got a hold of my social security number?
Daryn,
I think you're safe, dude. You're an imaginary character.
So are you up for Chili's tonight? Take a Hike and Carol have a taste for an Awesome Blossom. We're all meeting at the pre-frontal lobe at 8. Be there or be square.
Brad
Can you guys swing by and pick me up at the hippocampus? There's a short circuit in the neural net that's gonna keep me tied up until near dinnertime. This one's gonna be a mess. I think yesterday blew a few junctions.
Oma,
Do you really think its a good idea to make it appear that Tina's fiance is lying?? I mean, honestly, we did have a good chat today, but he was very pleasant...and never rude enough to hang up on me...
Really, stop making more stuff up...
I mean, HONESTLY Oma, you've had the man's fiance ARRESTED for "identity theft". Do you think YOU are really somebody he wants to talk to??
So, are you now going to change your story and blame Tina for the Forgery Charge???
Funny Oma, but he always returns my calls...If he didn't want to talk to me anymore, than why DID he talk to me already today....See, you lie even more.
Besides, since OMA put his fiance in jail, do you think he's going to BELIVE you? of course he doesn't.
But, Oma, wasn't Tina living with you while all this was going on? Some company you keep, huh?
Remember Oma, I told you BEFORE Tina was arrested that she told me she was worried Oma was going to claim Tina stole her identity.
So, clarify. DOES OMA aka ALEXANDRA claim Tina stole her identity or NOT??
It's a very simple question, Justin dear. Some of us missed all your posts yesterday, and it would be a real imposition to ask Mr. Moshein to repost the copies he kept.
My understanding is that you earlier posted that Tina had nothing to do with the reason you -- er, Oma -- got arrested.
Is it too difficult for you to clarify whether you still stand by that assertion, dear? Responding to a question to which you must have the answer right at hand seems so very little to ask.
and, for the record, I NEVER mentioned anything about being an attorney to Tina, her fiance or her friend Debbie...
Blogger Justin Edwards said...
Better clear something:
Fran wrote:She forges more checks and winds up in jail yet again. Whose fault? Tina Vanveen's.
I wrote something that sounds as if I am accusing the real Tina V of something related to this question.It isn't Tina's fault about why O was arrested, she had nothing to do with it. She was in prison.
July 11, 2009 1:38 PM
Why, thank you, Mr. Moshein for taking the effort to resurrect that post. It would have been easier, I'm sure, if Justin had simply admitted she -- er, he -- put it up. But she -- er, he -- doesn't really seem to be gaited to be helpful.
P - Bob Atchison,
Go to hell and eat dog shit the man who lies to cops and uses forged documents, I wonder Bob if you are going to go to jail for doing this.
I hope!!
oh, and by the by Oma, "if" the fiance doesn't want to talk to me, a. WHY does he promptly return my calls, and
b. WHY has Tina called me twice this morning from jail?? hmm?
It seems that the July 11 post might pose something of a problem for Justin.
If Miss Vanveen is accused of any involvement with Ms. Hamou/McConnell's arrest, the assertions of someone who claims to have very intimate knowledge of Ms. Hamou/McConnell's affairs becomes evidence on which the defense can seek discovery.
I trust you are saving the ipn's from which Justin is posting, Mr. Moshein. Miss Vanveen's lawyer will need it to obtain a court order to trace its owner. Miss Vanveen's arrest certainly gives her grounds to seek disclosure of Justin's true identity.
And, of course, if Justin turns out to be Ms. Hamou, well then, she has forestalled one of her own potential defenses.
An interesting predicament.
oh, and the reason I believe that the "real Justin EdwardS" doesn't post and Oma/aka Alexandra DOES is because Tina told me so.
Tina said in the entire time she lived at Oma/Alexandra's house, she never even HEARD of Justin Edwards and that it was always OMA on the computer posting. The only person who was actually helping her out was that old Valley Perv. Jim Sproul, who, Tina said, Oma used to call all the time asking him to post stuff on the internet for her. Tina felt REALLY bad for Sproul, she says he is an ugly old man who really is in love with Oma/Alexandra and he gives her money all the time, but Oma never gives him anything back (if you know what I mean...Tina was more graphic, but you get the picture)
Sorry there, Oma/Alexandra et al, but merely repeating what someone told me and saying that I believe it is NOT defamation by a long shot.
And remember you have to prove that your character is damaged, and I think that a twenty year history of arrests, felony fraud convictions, having sat in jail for a cumulative YEAR over the course of your life not to mention the string of unpaid judgments and attorneys, well, that pretty much damaged your character far worse than anything I have written here. Please do sue me for defamation, I can't wait to see the judge's face when they read the complaint...
Now, back to the million dollar (bail) question:
YES OR NO: DOES OMA HAMOU AKA ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL AKA ALEXANDRA MURPHY ET AL CLAIM THAT TINA VANVEEN STOLE HER IDENTITY AMONG OTHERS?
"Justin" posts will be deleted until this question is answered.
Would somebody please hold that woman steady? I keep trying to resort the wiring down here near her hippocampus to restore some memory, but she's just running all over the room, stomping, cussing and slamming things around.
If somebody doesn't calm her down, I'm never going to get that memory reestablished of that post where she said Tina had nothing to do with the forgery allegations involving her.
I'm trying to help you guys out, but it's like riding a bronco in here. And I've already had enough of her horseback riding. We all have.
You'd best hang on to your copy of that July 11 post, Mr. Moshein, because I'm not sure I can get this wiring sorted out. Half these circuits are shooting sparks like the 4th of July down here.
I'm simply amazed to read this stuff.
Honestly, Oma.
It's pretty much over. You've been busted, girlfriend.
I had a very interesting phone call today from an investigative firm that has been watching this blog. My name has come up several times in posts these past few days as one of the aliases you used. They asked all sorts of questions, some of them about people of whom I have never heard --- a lawyer named Pastor, for example --- but they were particularly interested in the accuracy of the information posted on this blog. I told them the simple truth. There has never been anything posted here regarding your actual illegal actions that has not been verifiable through a simple internet search, or by a P.I. that I and my legal people each tossed $30 into a pool to hire out there. You have provided us with hours of entertainment on this blog, and we wanted to know what the real truth was. We now do. Of course, I sat on a lot of the information we uncovered out of fear for what you might do to poor Justin. It turns out that the concept of retribution is not exactly unknown to you, as Tina Van Veen can testify, so I think we were right to reserve what we found. Sorry, Rob, but you've discovered it without any trouble.
You have put so much crap on the internet, Oma, that this was bound to happen. Those that live by the keyboard are nailed by the keyboard.
Also, Mitzi is wrong. I spent substantial time in the Middle East during my career, and the burka is not going to keep anything from happening.
Rebecca Jordan
I had a phone call too, Rebecca! This morning!
OMA OMA OMA
You really need to stop LYING especially when using the Justin sock puppet. I just had a LONG chat with someone close to Tina, and everything you wrote about her fiance is a total LIE according to her. Her fiance, she says, NEVER SPOKE to a Justin Edwards, Her fiance would NEVER speak to "Alexandra"...
DO you really think Ms Joo won't be interested in your shenanigans?
Do we know anything about the details of the felony charges against Oma Hamou - O'Connell? What are they claiming she did? Forgery is a serious crime and involves making false documents that's all I know. How many years can she expect to get?
Would the fact Oma Hamou - O'Connell is impersonating this Justin Edwards guy here in this blog be of any interest to the authorities that locked her up in jail for six weeks?
I spoke to Mr. Mark Pastor this afternoon at his law office in Encino. What a very nice man. He was a trifle confused at first, but when I explained that someone from his office (which handles sensitive financial information of clients) was paying close attention to this blog about a woman who had been arrested for forgery and who has a history of identity theft, he was very quick on the uptake.
I certainly hope he finds this was a matter of idle curiosity for someone in his office and that the person following this blog is in no way involved with Ms. Hamou/McConnell/etc.
I really did feel it was my duty as a good citizen. Identity theft is becoming so prevalent these days, and so many people are hurt by it. If those who can do something to put others on their guard about the risks, it just seems the right thing do, don't you all agree?
You got my vote, P.
P Bob Atchison,
Wonderful you talked with this law firm.
Then you won't mind if we on O's team ask him if he talked with some nut by the name of Bob Atchison or any other nut associated with Pallasart.
And what you nuts said to him.
Very cool.
I'm not sure you really understand what has happened here, Ms. Hamou. Ms. Autumnvale spoke with someone about the possibility of identity theft because his office is a prime source of information. And you are currently arraigned on a charge of forgery, which by definition is, you know, identity theft, Ms. Hamou. What is he going to say to your lawyer? "Does your client wish to confess to involvement in this matter?" Of course, there is always the possibility that someone like Hedley Artmam works there or something. Whatever. Either way, Ms. Hamou, you seem to be confusing your role in this affair as one of the good guys. Which, you know, you aren't, girlfriend.
Penelope Autumnvale did not call me today, though. It was someone else.
Rebecca Jordan
Perhaps you should start an all-new website about this, Ms. Hamou, dear. It always goes so very well for you when you do.
Go ahead and call Mr. Pastor, dear. I expect you will find him just as nice as I did.
I've already stated quite truthfully what was explained to Mr. Pastor about the purpose of the call, but you don't appear to be a trusting soul by nature, so certainly you should call him to reassure yourself.
And who knows, dear. It might pay you to get to know yet another lawyer. Or you might refer Mr. Sproul to him for advice about how best to handle the gift taxes on the money Mr. Sproul has given you.
Oh, I do so enjoy being of help to so many people.
Hey, Hamou, you've had a lawyer since last December. That was seven months ago. And you've been bragging about all sorts of legal action against Mr. Moshein since this blog started. What's your lawyer doing? Sitting on his ass all the time? How effing long does it take a lawyer to draw up a complaint for Chrissakes?
Goodness gracious me, Ms. Hamou. You, a convicted felon with a history of stealing identities and social security numbers who is now in pre-trial proceedings for yet another felony, has a friend in a tax law office -- where all sorts of social security numbers and other financial information on people are in the files.
I'm certainly glad Mr. Pastor found out about this friendship with one of his employees. I just hope it was in time to keep everyone out of trouble.
Hey I like that idea of Oma Hamou starting a whole new website.
I remember back when all she could talk about was being a movie actress, a big Hollywood producer, the CEO of a film company, the Chairman of a big Russian charity who knew all sorts of important folks, and how she was always jetting around the world for meetings and production shoots.
It's kind of depressing that all we're hearing now is her criminal history, all the lawsuits she's lost, her being put on trial for forgery, her getting some girl arrested who was also a forger and identity thief while she was living with Oma Hamou who was working under two aliases at once. How she got a beat up old Mercedes that needed a paint job and new upholstery, how she gets money from some old man who helps her attack people on the internet, how she got picked up for driving without a license or registration or insurance, how she lives with a bunch of cats, and how the cops took her computers.
I want the old Oma Hamou back. The world needs more half naked fake business executives on horseback.
Well, no. Mitzi Kedem was right when she posted that you have a strange concept of the American legal system, Mrs. Demian. If the police are in fact reading this blog, and after my conversation today I have every reason to believe they are, then they are reading it with an eye to amassing further information to use against you in court. You seem to think that the very system that is currently trying to imprison you is hellbent upon making your case against Moshein and Atchison. Since you have failed to convince anyone of anything over the past nine years (nine years? Really? Because you have posted warm and cordial e-mails between you and Atchison that are certainly not that old, or are you admitting that you were being deceitful in your dealings with him?), it is unlikely that the police are giving any credence to your ravings now.
Rebecca Jordan
We keep getting confused here, but we're just camels. Wasn't Judge Livingston the judge in that lawsuit you lost, Mrs. Hamou?
Well, she didn't fail to convince everyone, Rebecca. People who drink a lot fell in with her pretty easy.
We are still mourning poor Clyde, but we stand in solidarity with the Rocks and the Camels.
Oma/Justin, your comments were deleted as promised. It seems English is not your first language:
Blogger RobMoshein said...
Now, back to the million dollar (bail) question:
YES OR NO: DOES OMA HAMOU AKA ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL AKA ALEXANDRA MURPHY ET AL CLAIM THAT TINA VANVEEN STOLE HER IDENTITY AMONG OTHERS?
"Justin" posts will be deleted until this question is answered.
July 15, 2009 1:50 PM
Ms. Hamou, perhaps my next call should go to your lawyer in Victorville. You say he is copying all this, and perhaps I could answer some of the questions he must surely have as he prepares the lawsuit against Mr. Moshein.
At a minimum, we could at least be sure he did not accidentally log onto the wrong blog. As overwrought as you must be with eveything going on right now, perhaps you gave him the wrong internet address.
I just want to be as helpful as I can be. To anyone.
Alexandra! From Great Tsarskoe Selo in the sky I am greeting you! Stop using my name in vain, silly woman, to make attacks upon Tovarisch Atchison, who is fine man who has done fine things for Pushkin Village and Alexander Palace, unlike some people who promise much but deliever nothing even when we let them pose in Tsarina's former chapel. You are only free to say these things because I have passed to great restoration project in the sky, but I have begged permission to come back for this time to tell you to shut your blinishole, Alexandra! Perhaps you should change your last name to Potemkin, because much like him, you certainly seem to get around!
Grand Duchess Bubbalova wants me to say hello and warm regards to Mr. McGrope, and perhaps he could send her some money in the hereafter?
So I have a question for "Justin", and I hope if he answers it hangs around long enough for me to actually read it.
When I spoke with the investigator earlier today he unloaded all sorts of information about your "friend's" life, some of which sounded so incredible that I wouldn't have believed it unless I hadn't been reading this blog and all of hers for the past month or so. Haven't any of her friend noticed the sheer amount of crazy that has followed Oma Hamou around since she landed in Hollywood with a sack of clothes, a baby doll and a song in her heart?
Rebecca Jordan
Some years ago Oma Hamou hired me as a consultant for a movie on a multi-year contract. I was not paid and after three months I cancelled our written agreement. After years of broken promises by Ms. Hamou to pay me for the work I did I filed a lawsuit against Ms. Hamou. I won the lawsuit and was awarded a judgment which has grown to $23,000. The jury decided in my favor 11-1.
Oma Hamou has been stated that I lied and forged documents to win the case. This is not true.
When we were getting close to our trial date I was contacted by a man from Los Angeles who said he had been offered $15,000 by Hamou and her financial sponsor, Jim Sproul, to go to Austin and make me 'go away' - get rid of me - and thus stop my case against Hamou. This man said it was clear they wanted me killed and volunteered to go to the police.
I had never met this man before, I had never heard his name before. The man gave a statement to the police and was interviewed by my Attorney.
I will be happy to give more information and contacts on what happened to the DA on this new forgery case if they get in touch with me.
Why am I posting this? Anyone who comes against Hamou in any way could be in great danger. Protect yourself and be careful.
Oma/Justin, your comments were deleted as promised. It seems English is not your first language:
Blogger RobMoshein said...
Now, back to the million dollar (bail) question:
YES OR NO: DOES OMA HAMOU AKA ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL AKA ALEXANDRA MURPHY ET AL CLAIM THAT TINA VANVEEN STOLE HER IDENTITY AMONG OTHERS?
"Justin" posts will be deleted until this question is answered.
July 15, 2009 1:50 PM
Why am I posting this? Anyone who comes against Hamou in any way could be in great danger. Protect yourself and be careful.
Tina Vanveen went to jail because Oma Hamou aka Alexandra McConnell was mad at her for contacting me, according to Tina...there is a pattern it seems
Oh, darn it. I went off to brush my teeth and missed "Justin's" response, it seems.
And Mr. Atchison, the attempt to silence you was referenced today by the man with whom I spoke.
Rebecca Jordan
I should have also said that Oma Hamou has never paid the judgment the court awarded to me.
What I wrote is the truth. People can judge for themselves who they want to believe.
Oma/Justin/Alexandra
Clearly you are simply too stupid to comprehend clear and basic English...
your latest dozen psycho posts have been deleted BECAUSE:
Blogger RobMoshein said...
Oma/Justin, your comments were deleted as promised. It seems English is not your first language:
Blogger RobMoshein said...
Now, back to the million dollar (bail) question:
YES OR NO: DOES OMA HAMOU AKA ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL AKA ALEXANDRA MURPHY ET AL CLAIM THAT TINA VANVEEN STOLE HER IDENTITY AMONG OTHERS?
"Justin" posts will be deleted until this question is answered.
July 15, 2009 1:50 PM
Bob Atchison,
The courts in Texas and law enforcement agencies believed Oma was telling the truth over YOU.
Sandman is posting the actual documents on the web so the cops and everyone else can see that you are incapable of telling the truth.
Oma does want the AG's office to prosecute you, she wants them to re-open the reports you made to every law enforcement agency because you keep saying the cops are lying and your telling the truth.
She wants them to do this so the world can see what kind of man you really are. Maybe you'll go to jail for the crimes you've committed? What do you think?
We are getting more and more confused here, Mrs. Hamou. (As camels, that is the one of your many names which we most honor.)
If you keep going to the cops about Bob Atchison, and it is you they always believe, why is it that Bob Atchison has never spent a day in jail but you keep winding up there over and over?
They might call us dumb animals, but we're not stupid, you know.
Oh, dear, Mr. Atchison. You have brought up some information that both Ms. Hamou's and Miss Vanveen's lawyers certainly should have in order to serve their clients well.
I know Ms. Hamou thinks her lawyer is busily making copies of all this. But I really had better give him a call just to be sure he's copying the right blog.
He might view dealing with this as a distraction from trying to keep Ms. Hamou out of prison for her current felony charge. However, since Ms. Hamou obviously views her interminable vendetta against Messrs. Atchison and Moshein as the most important thing going on in her life right now, we should give him all the help we can.
My heart will go out to Ms. Hamou if she does wind up in prison. On top of all the inconveniences and indignities a former CEO and movie producer will suffer there, it will be sheer torture for her not to be able to spend her waking hours at a keyboard launching websites and forums to attack her perceived enemies.
And poor Mr. Sproul. I hope he won't get so lonely without Ms. Hamou that he won't be up to maintaining the attacks on her behalf. Although given his advanced years, I doubt we can expect the sheer volume of colorful posting we've all enjoyed from Ms. Hamou and her wide array of characters.
Justin Edwards wrote:
"Bob Atchison,
The courts in Texas and law enforcement agencies believed Oma was telling the truth over YOU."
Good God in heaven. Is this man/woman just stark raving mad?
Oma is the one who lost the case, you dimwit. Oma is the one who owes Atchison a court-ordered judgment. Oma is the one whose lawsuit against Mr. Atchison was tossed out. Oma is the one who has lost almost another dozen lawsuits. Oma is the one who already has multiple felony convictions and is out on bail for yet another felony arrest right now while she's writing all this crap on the internet.
Jeez, what a lunatic.
Just a couple of comments, as I have a busy morning ahead. But I was thinking about some of this last night.
1) "Justin", you have constantly posted that Oma Hamou does not read any of this because it is too upsetting. There are long posts about the effects of what you describe as cyber stalking (which are culled from something like Wikipedia, and obviously do not describe Moshein/Atchison's behavior for the past several years.) It is clear that what you somewhat childishly refer to as "Team Hamou" have maintained this vendetta, not they. Nevertheless, the question remains. If "you" are so damned certain that this business is upsetting to "her", why do you continue to relay every gory detail of the blogs to her? Why does she provide you with 20 year old pictures of her humping rocks, leering into the camera with her hands discreetly crossed over her breasts, merrily jumping over small campfires, spread-eagle on the back of a horse, and any of the other cheesy so-called "art" photos that accompany all of these blog entries? This hardly seems consonant with a desire for privacy.
You are constantly talking about what a stressful situation this all is for Oma Hamou, and yet by your own admissions it is you who constantly keep her informed about what is being said. Are you not adding to her stress?
It just seems illogical, but I am sure there is an explanation. There always is with "Team Hamou". And since that team presumably includes her current legal representation, that brings me to my next thought:
2) Penelope has a point. If Oma Hamou is indeed faced with a legal crisis of such proportions, and one that clearly has nothing to do with the imagined events of earlier this century, and if she is in fact looking at the possibility of a prison sentence, and if she does have a long track record of, shall we say, prior questionable involvement with the legal system, is doing this kind of writing on the internet really in her best interests? I don't think so, and I don't think her lawyer would think so either. All of her past/current activities in regard to the law are easily available from non-involved websites.
3) I'm not worried about Justin Edward's liability in all of this for obvious reasons. But at least two apparently real people, Jim Sproul and the Russophile woman, have been dragged into what could turn into a libel/slander action should they proceed in that direction. This seems to me a real possibility. It certainly would be if I was in the position these two men find themselves in with regard to "Team Hamou" (by the way, I have to ask. Do you have jerseys with logos?) I don't know either Moshein or Atchison, but I am impressed that both have posted under their own names on this blog. I discount your pretension that they have been everyone else, by the way, based purely opon my own experience. I have spoken with "Justin Edward", I have now spoken with "Penelope Autumnvale" (this morning) and I have had real contact with someone named "Russophile" (who did not use the name given as her 'real' identity on this blog). I also know that I am a real person. Several of the other posters have identified themselves as imaginary, so there it is. Moshein and Atchison have posted under their own names, which seems to me to be an important testimony to their veracity. If there is a shadowy figure in all of this, it is Oma Hamou, who receives all of her information from what might charitably be described as minions. Or in a phrase I adore, sock puppets.
Just my thoughts,
Rebecca Jordan
Oma,
I am not a "control freak" rather you have been asked a simply question repeatedly:
Oma/Justin/Alexandra
Clearly you are simply too stupid to comprehend clear and basic English...
your latest dozen psycho posts have been deleted BECAUSE:
Blogger RobMoshein said...
Oma/Justin, your comments were deleted as promised. It seems English is not your first language:
Blogger RobMoshein said...
Now, back to the million dollar (bail) question:
YES OR NO: DOES OMA HAMOU AKA ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL AKA ALEXANDRA MURPHY ET AL CLAIM THAT TINA VANVEEN STOLE HER IDENTITY AMONG OTHERS?
"Justin" posts will be deleted until this question is answered.
July 15, 2009 1:50 PM
July 16, 2009 12:40 AM
YOU are the one who wants to dictate the discussion by REFUSING to answer the question and flying off on long tirades that AVOID answering the question.
I recently read on the web one of the hallmarks of the BULLY:
Retaliation: the bully counterattacks. The bully quickly and seamlessly follows the denial with an aggressive counter-attack of counter-criticism or counter-allegation, often based on distortion or fabrication. Lying, deception, duplicity, hypocrisy and blame are the hallmarks of this stage. The purpose is to avoid answering the question and thus avoid accepting responsibility for their behavior.
Rebecca, I just want to tell you again, dear, how very much I enjoyed our phone chat this morning.
And, yes, dear. I always did believe you were real. One could just feel the sincerity in every word you wrote. I am not the type of person to let one little encounter with a fraudulent serial poster such as "Justin Edwards" dampen my faith that most people are the good, forthright people they profess to be.
People. Are they not just the most wonderful of God's creatures? How sad that some of them have to end up in prison from time to time, to time, to time.
P,
My apologies for assuming you were Bob Atchison or one of Rob Moshein's alter egos.
No apology necessary, dear. I would take no offense at being mistaken for either gentleman. I just want us all to get along here.
P,
If you want me to get a long as you say then don't call me by my friend's name.
Have you heard from Tina, dear? If so, how is she doing? Did her arraignment go well this morning?
Bob Atchison,
I wonder if the DA will believe your word over the word of COPS and AUTHENTIC, CERTIFIED DOCUMENTATION showing you committed perjury, gave false documents and lied to the cops with respect to my friend? I wonder how the fact Pallasart created a web site in the name of the alleged hit man, John Lupoli who later contacted the GoDaddy.com and said this was done without his permission so your company could reveal private information about him. O is asking the AG to INVESTIGATE YOU I wonder if legally, they can put you in jail for this? I mean you have come on this public web blog and said a lie, time will tell.
P,
I don't know Tina.
I have never met her.
I have no desire to see what happened in court this morning to her.
None.
Thank you very much.
It's so heartening to hear that you -- er, your friend -- and the AG are on such good terms again. Has all that little nastiness about your felony prosecution been put behind you -- er her, -- then, dear?
Justin, dear, I find your post about Tina somewhat confusing. You seem to have such intimate knowledge of Oma Hamou, right down to her thoughts, her pasttimes, her legal files, her private photo albums. Yet you don't even know her housemate, a woman she took in out of the kindness of her heart?
That seems rather odd, dear. If I didn't know you to be such a sincere person, I might almost have reason to doubt you.
P,
I have no FELONY on my record or pending.
Why can't you act like a human being?
You have never met me yet you pretend you know that I am my friend.
We are all our own best friends, dear. That is, as long as we can respect ourselves in the morning.
P,
I am little confused to as what your doing on this blog.
Rob's stalking image provided him with an IP from a law office that specializes in Tax stuff.
Remaining true to form and this documented is going to be used in court, he assumes the peson behind that IP has to do with my friend Oma.
A woman, perhaps you, with a choppy voice asks a copule of questions about IDENTITY THEFT. The attorney found the call STRANGE.
As to your question about Tina, I knew a woman was living with her, I didn't know her name. She has other people living with her who I only recently met.
This Tina person was supposed to clean and maintain the house, I've been told she didn't do this so O hired someone else. Despite what Rob wrote on this blog O does not sleep on a filthy mattress nor is her home filthy.
Thank you very much.
Well, these are strange times and strange doings, my dear.
Exactly what did the attorney find was false, dear? He was simply told that someone using an ipn assigned to his business was reading this blog during business hours and that the two women being discussed on the blog were both being prosecuted for forgery.
Could you please illuminate for us which parts of these assertions he found to be false, dear?
Will this looming lawsuit be tried in Victorville, dear, or would Mr. Pastor prefer to have it tried in Los Angeles?
All right then! These lawsuits are going to be more fun than the last two Harry Potter movies.
Oma can sue Rob and Bob for stalking her around the internet for stalking them around the internet. Rob and Bob can sue Jim Sproul for what he posted as Sandman and Mike. And Rob can sue Michele Biernat and Benefit Design Group for the posts and threats she made from Benefit Design Group.
I can't wait for everybody to get their court orders to see whose who behind all these posts. Heck, we already know who Voldemort is. This is way more exciting.
Well Brenda, he can put a law suit together, anybody can, though I do have saved his response that nothing I have said or did has hurt his business or him in any way. And his erasure of my rebuttle. So, yeah, he can spend the money, though the lawyers will be laughing all the way to the bank.
The real Justin Edwards just read this blog from Honolulu. Yet the other real Justin Edwards has been posting from Northridge just now.
Could Justin EDWARD please show up and tell us what the deuce is going on? Where are you right now? Even I am confused.
Your REAL Lord and Master
Me
Sorry there you psychotic twit (I prefer another vowel in that one word for you, but I'll keep this clean)
but I NEVER SAID any such thing. All I said was that the Wine guy business was doing well, but that does NOT imply that I have not suffered any loss of buiness or reputation because of the INTENTIONAL DEFAMATION you posted about me.
Oh, and "re-Buttle" is the memorandum headings for the central character in "Brazil". You can't even spell rebuttal.....
Well, dear, I doubt if you are too worried about being sued right now, what with a felony prosecution hanging over your head.
The good news is that the Federal Courts will still be there when you get out, if you do go to prison. So you'll have something to look forward to upon your release. That gives me no end of relief, dear.
Justin, dear. Perhaps you and Justin should coordinate your activities a bit better so that he's not reading from Honolulu while you're posting from Northridge. That's what phones are for, dear. Coordination.
But Rob, you THRIVE on this crap. Really. Internet law is so fuzzy, isn't it??
And I told you, I never professed to be a scholar or a writer. That was P's department.
Oh, and I am SOOOO sick and tired of your deliberate misrepresentation of facts Oma...
No, the Russian Orthodox Church never said you are the Devil's Handmaiden. However, the women who WORK at the Feodorovsky Sobor, the Church in Pushkin, who met you when you were there DID tell many people that they believe you ARE THE DEVIL'S HANDMAIDEN. Their opinion, of course...
YES OR NO: DOES OMA HAMOU AKA ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL AKA ALEXANDRA MURPHY ET AL CLAIM THAT TINA VANVEEN STOLE HER IDENTITY AMONG OTHERS?
"Justin" posts will be deleted until this question is answered.
You will NOT deflect the discussion away to avoid answering this question...sorry BULLY.
boom chow munki
Oh, dear, my head is spinning.
Grand Shovel, could you please tell me which real Justin Edwards just posted? The one in Honolulu or the one in California?
Beats me.
Blogger RobMoshein said...
YES OR NO: DOES OMA HAMOU AKA ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL AKA ALEXANDRA MURPHY ET AL CLAIM THAT TINA VANVEEN STOLE HER IDENTITY AMONG OTHERS?
"Justin" posts will be deleted until this question is answered.
You will NOT deflect the discussion away to avoid answering this question...sorry BULLY.
boom chow munki
July 16, 2009 12:36 PM
hic.
Of course when I checked the blog it showed up as being from Honolulu. D'uh. I'm in Honolulu. Next?
And the reason I haven't met Tina Van Veen is because I haven't seen Oma in years. I have no idea who the hell she is living with, or whther her house is dirty. She was about as clean as you would expect of a person with her background. She grew up poor, that part of the story is true, and I think they could only bathe once a week if I remember correctly. I used to help her with her table manners at different times, she had this weird habit of pouring molasses over all of her food before she would eat it.
Justin
I've had this site open for most of the day, following the exchanges. "Justin", I still haven't had an answer to my questions. No rush. Penelope, have you called Ms. Hamou's lawyer? The investigators to whom I spoke (and it turned out that they also called DiCastelis, whose name has appeared on this blog, they are very thorough) gave me the impression that they will be in contact with the authorities in San Bernadino at the beginning of the week to make the existence of her antics known as part of an establishment of character. Mrs. Biernat, I would strongly suggest that you avoid posting here in the future, but if you persist, at least take the trouble to get a lawyer to check over your assertions and prevent you from making statements that won't hold up for a second under a reasonably intelligent cross-examination, should it come to that.
Rebecca Jordan
Hey Rebecca,
I told you this would be the way it would play out! She's going to try to take us all down with her, me, Tina VV, Mike Newson, that Russophile woman, even that Sproul guy, she's going to throw us all under the bus!
I know you and Mr. D. said that there was nothing that she could do to me here but I am still a little freaked by the fact that she ratted Tina out. Plus what if the next time she approaches someone like Lupoli the guy doesn't do the right thing, instead he takes the money and goes after us? Because dead men tell no tales!
Justin
Oh my God!
You people are really despicable, but you already knew this.
Mike Pyles aka Rebecca Jordan,
I wonder to the fake Rebecca Jordan how the DA will react when they learn you are hiding behind a name back in 2006 which you accused O of kidnapping and how you and Rob pretended the stalking images on another history forum was necessary because there was a warrant out for her arrest turns out there was no warrants and the cops told you to get lost.
I wonder if this information and your emails and how you tricked the OC people into providing you with a photo line up and let's see if Citadel knows you do this on their time while they are paying you?
Justin,
We offered to have her watched on our dime but you said you didn't want that. I doubt she can afford busfare to Encino let alone Honolulu. Relax, kiddo.
Justin Edwards: I have literally no idea what you are talking about. I mean, I have read in your posts that you think someone named Mike Pyles has it out for you, and Ihave read something called the Chicago Dossier that was compiled during roughly the period you describe, but I have never seen any evidence that he is behind anything. My goodness, Justin, the world is certainly filled with conspiracies for Team Hamou, isn't it?
Rebecca "Not Mike Pyles" Jordan
I would like to make arrangements for Ms. Hamou to pay the judgment I have against her. How can we arrange this?
Oh, dear. Here I am all confused about three posting Justins, two vying Rebeccas, one drinking Russophile, and a convict in a pear tree. Now there's another character in the play?
And me without a program.
Okay, Rebecca, I guess you guys know best.
Also, Fake Me, Rebecca is not anyone named Mike unless that person has a severe hormone problem. I've talked to her on the phone, dude.
Boom, baby!
Mike Newson?
Dears, I am now totally confused. Really, I am.
My darling crazy goyim, is anyone thinking about the effect all of this must be having on Little Dromer's delicate psyche? It can't be a box of potato salad being you-know-who's kid anyway (see how respectful? I didn't even say the name!), being exposed to all of the bad influences and such, and now this? I am worried about him. It's a pain. In my heart. What if he grows up thinking he is unloved? That's the kind of thing that can make a child surly, inclined to assault other children. Andc how popular is that going to make the little, you should excuse the expression, bastard.
Mitzi
dont you worry about the baby Kedem woman hes being taken care of just fine up at the raqnch while his momma goes for court, we'eve had enough experience with this kind fo thing that we have it down to a drill. and what the hell is so funny about pouring molasses on evrything it sweetens it right up nothing like it. L'il Bit you keep your pecker up things is going to work out just fine. the whole tribe is behind you on this like we alwqays are, and homer is already working on getting you a sweet berth if it comes to it up at the pen, he knows people.
Don't nobody here worry about Dromer's delicate psyches. That little feller has seen stuff that would make yalls hair curl. He's mostly worried that his mama is gonna put him in some hospital on some trumped up something or other.
No, Penelope, she is talking about someone named Mike Pyles. Mike Newson is some photographer who used to run a lot of "art" (read "soft porn") sites with very strange pictures of young girls. That much is out on the internet. I am assuming that he is responsible for some of the pictures of Oma Hamou that have appeared on her various websites. Justin Edwards, did he take the one of her rising like Venus on the half-shell, all dewy with the dawn? It's a personal favorite with Legal.
Rebecca "Still Valiantly Hanging On Without Being Mike Pyles" Jordan
Is no one going to answer my question? I know tension is high right now, but I really see no cause for rudeness, dears.
Ms P,
Even I can't follow which question you still want answered. Would you mind refreshing the memory??
Penelope,
See above. You might want to start keeping a scorecard. We do.
Rebecca
Thank you, Mr. Moshein. I have gotten a bit confused. The last time I heard a university mentioned here, it was Virginia University (which, of course, does not exist). Now someone is talking about The Citadel which, I believe, is in South Carolina. I cannot find any Mike Pyles listed there, so that was no help.
Cripes. The lengths that Justin Edwards/Oma Hamou will go to to deflect the real issue from her.
As near as I can read the record (meaning final court judgments, not interim one-sided complaints), the only thing that has ever been proved in a court of law where real rules of evidence apply about either Rob Moshein or Bob Atchison is that Oma Hamou stiffed Bob Atchison on a $13,000 debt (which has now grown to $23,000 due to default in paying the court-ordered judgment).
On the other hand, here's what has been proved in a court of law using real rules of evidence against Oma Hamou:
She has mulitple convictions for passing bad checks.
She has violated her terms of probation.
She has stiffed numerous other people on debts she owed them, including credit card companies, acupuncturists, hairdressers, publishers, her own lawyers (twice), etc.
And now she is in pre-trial proceedings for a felony arrest for forgery, where she was held in a real jail for six weeks under a $1 million bail.
Yeah, this woman is gonna sue everybody and his brother for defamation or whatever the hell she calls responding to her internet attacks on people. Right.
Interesting news. This blog has been linked to Facebook by someone, besides the logins from several U.S. cities and two European cities in the past few days.
The fame of Oma Hamou Movie Producer grows. Just like she wanted.
Has anyone heard how poor Tina's arraignment went yesterday? I'm just frantic with worry over the dear girl.
I'm worried too. At 5'6" and 135 lbs, Tina is a lot closer to a size 8 than Oma/Alexandra. Somebody in the jail really might take a fancy to her.
Oh, dear Lord! Now I'm in an absolute panic about the poor dear.
I do everything I can to keep people out of trouble, but it just never seems to be enough.
Good morning.
Penelope, I doubt that anything you did has caused this to play out any differently than it would have had you not made your helpful phone calls. But you are not the only interested party in play in this investigation. There are suddenly people in New Jersey in play. One of my people did some checking and traced the investigator who called me back to a firm located in northern Jersey. So there is something going on on this coast as well. As I told you on the phone yesterday, we were all cagey in our comments, both on our side and on his. The firm is definitely legitimate.
Rebecca Jordan
That's good to know, Rebecca, dear. But I'm having trouble staying focused this morning, I'm just so desperately worried about Tina.
Do you think that perhaps Tina's attorney has talked to Justin/Oma's attorney about all this internet discussion regarding their clients?
I cannot imagine Justin/Oma's attorney would be happy with all this information about his client's past coming to light just at the time he/she is facing a possible felony trial. But, of course, we tried to warn dear Justin/Oma so very many times that his/her chronic attacks of people on the internet were not exactly in his/her best interests. The poor boy/girl was just too obsessed with his/her bizarre vendetta to hear it, though.
Sigh. Good works are just so taxing.
I'm pleased to be able to say that according to the LA Sheriff's Dept website, Tina Vanveen was released yesterday on an "Imperative Release" and on her own recognizance and no bail.
This tells me that most likely the charges against her will be dropped. Her claims that perhaps Alexandra/Oma set her up might have been accurate...I don't have the details yet to support my suspicion, but as soon as I get them I will let everyone know.
But what of poor Justin/Oma, Mr. Moshein? I'm truly worried about him/her.
Has he/she gone on the lam again? (With Tina now out of jail, Justin/Oma must be just the teensiest bit on edge.) Has his/her lawyer muzzled him/her? Have the police confiscated his/her computers again? Is he/she just too upset to type?
Has he/she perhaps sought sanctuary with Michele Biernat in Portland? (I know that would violate his/her bail terms, but he/she has been known to cross state lines before in violation of probation terms.) The poor dear needs all his/her friends right now.
Oh dear, oh dear.
Rob you call yourself an attorney, NOT!
Tina's charges were dropped because because she took the deal she has a hold on her from prison and is going to back. Your not a good attorney, the evidence against her is stronger than your make believe defamation that it is because of O you are a liar and the cops say this. You are a stalker and online harassment is never o.k. as the record shows you and pallasar have really tried to put o in jail for crimes she never committed and this is documented and will work against you soon, for 9 years, yo9u don't know the facts but you and Bob pretenmd and make things up so Tina has a hold from the prison. You lie Rob and it is called defamation libel and whatever else.
P,
You will need to prove your words in court because the docuemtns say a different thing, documents thst a re certified from the court, so yoiu just libel Oma. Oma is on not on the lamb and she sis not wanted and the thing in Victorville isn't what you represent here on this blog that makes you a liar.
P aka Judi
You should be careful what you write.
Justin/Oma, dear. I did not say you were "on the lamb". The horse, maybe. The lamb? I hope never.
And, dear, you really need to calm down. Your last three posts are so full of typos that you seem to be tottering on the edge of incoherence.
Is something the matter, dear? Would you like to talk about it?
As for your legal exegesis of Tina's plight, I'm afraid you are not being very helpful, dear. What does having "a hold from prison" mean, dear?
And do try to slow down when you honor us with your next post. The very high level of misspelling is somewhat distracting, even though we do know what you mean. Well, mostly.
Will you and Tina be having a girl's night out tonight to celebrate her release from jail?
p,
I am not Oma.
I was in car accident in Irvine and hurt. I am on medication sorry for the typos. Tina has been released but took the deal to go back to prison because the evidence is strong.
I don't know her but I do feel sorry for the girl because she was clean for 5 months and the last 2 went back to her old ways. One wonders why people who are given a feww room, food and car would do this?
I don't know she says this is the only life she knows. I hear her mother is a sweet old lady. O paid to have Tina's teeth done to the tune of $900, paid to get her back to see her father before he passed away god rest his soul, gave her money for gas and she Oma was a good friend to her.
I am nmot writing anymore because you Judi are lyiong bitch and post here in the hopes to further harass and defame Oma.
How did you manage the air travel with the car accident in Irvine, dear? Justin Edwards logged onto the blog from Honolulu late yesterday, you see.
You do know that when you take "speed", rapid travel is not the result, don't you, dear?
tina has was realeased on all charges the prison has a hold on her she's going back. this is sad. sad for anyone to go back to prison for the same thing she was sent the first time round.
Judi aka P,
grow up and quit lying and harassing people.
"tina has was realeased on all charges the prison has a hold on her she's going back. this is sad."
It's also sad when one cannot write a coherent, properly punctuated sentence, dear.
How can Tina be "released on all charges" but still be going back to prison? There must be some charges that are still in effect, dear, in order for the state to have the right to intern her.
And who is Judi, dear? A once-ebullient grade school grammar teacher who must now come to terms with her mistakes?
Why don't you call the Jail and ask them what is the Hold from the prison. I am told she took the deal. She is going to prison for how long who knows. The evidence against her is strong. She was released on state charges but is going back to prison because she violated her parole.
First, here is the exact wording from the LA Sheriff's:
Court Date: 07/16/2009 Sentence Date: 07/17/2009 Number of days Sentenced: 0
Disposition Code: IMP Disposition Description: IMPERATIVE RELEASE
If one reads the California Criminal Rules, one finds "Imperative Release" means that indeed the Charges were dropped in their entirety.
then:
Court Date: 09/17/2009 Sentence Date: 07/16/2009 Number of days Sentenced: 0
Disposition Code: OR Disposition Description: OWN RECOGNIZANCE
This means they let her walk out the door without bail or further ado...
It seems HIGHLY unlikely that if they determined a felony probation violation that she would just walk out the door if they were going to put her back in prison for the violation...
Tina may just call me or post here and let us know what is going on.
It IS odd though that you seem to know so much about Tina, whom you claim never to have met, and Tina told me repeated that there WAS NO JUSTIN, just "Alexandra typing away on the computer", and since Tina admits she believes Alexandra is evil and wants nothing to do with her, she clearly wouldn't be talking to her....
So let me get this straight, Justin Edwards. You were in a car crash in Irvine, right near you-know-who, but you had never met Tina, who lived with your dearest friend for several months, presumably when she was giving you updates about her life and suffering that you could post on the internet? And in all that time you have not seen your Friend?
Seriously? Seriously?
Since you are the source for the "Go to jail even though she is released without bail" story, I suggest that before you chide Penelope and Moshein for their failure to understand the American legal system (and all Moshein did was post the information he received, not interpret it) that you try a course yourself. It can only help, since for some reason you persist in the notion that the prosecutor is out to help your Friend. And may I just say that every time I type the "your Friend" part I feel as though the spirit of Czarina Alexandra is hovering in the room?
Rebecca Jordan
My points exactly, Mr. Moshein. Justin, it might be better for you if you did not post when you are so obviously hopped up on the goofballs.
How accurate has Ms. Van Veen been so far?
Rebecca
And Justin Edwards, if the evidence against her was "strong", she would still be in jail. Q.E.D.
Also, surely your Friend's lawyer cannot be pleased with you, Justin Edwards, for continuing this harassment on the blog. To put it crudely, this is going to bite you in the ass. Hard.
Let us assess credibility briefly:
Tina: Said Alexandra/Oma was arrested on a felony in Victorville.
Truth: Alexandra Oma McConnell aka Oma Hamou WAS arrested on a Felony charge of Forgery of a Financial Instrument, and spent six weeks in JAIL as a result and is currently facing trial on the charge.
"Justin" calls it "the thing in Victorville that isn't what you represent here on this blog" So TELL us "Justin" WHAT is the thing in Victorville then??
Tina: Told me that Alexandra Oma was going to claim Tina stole her identity and set her up to go to jail.
Truth: Tina WAS arrested on such a charge, as she claimed, AND the charges against her were dropped completely!
"Justin" Claims that "any day now" Law Enforcment and Federal charges are going to come crashing down on my head.
Truth: Zero, Zilch, Nada, Zippo. Nothing has happened.
Yeah, we can see who seems far more reliable...
OH, yeah, by the by.
There are NO court records to be found that mention anything about a "hold".
Nothing in the LA Sheriff's, nothing in LA Superior Court, nada in San Bernardino.
SO Miss know it all Justin/Alexandra Oma...Ball in YOUR COURT TO PROVE YOUR CLAIM.
I've back everything up here with the Minute Records about YOU, so you do the same.
PS Rob,
You have not backed anything up on me such as the minuete order so that makes you a liar.
Your facts don't match reality no matter how hard you try to make it fit but you have a history all over the web of ding this just ask Penny. ;)
You mean that SAME Penny that ASKED me to help her and Greg with their new book, and who I've been working with on the project for like a year now and who will probably THANK ME publicly IN the book when it comes out??
Yeah, THAT Penny
9/23/2008:
We’re starting to reach the point now in the new book where questions
and issues are accumulating, so Penny and myself thought we had best get
started in raising the issues or concerns with appropriate parties. The
lists will continue to grow, obviously, as we progress, but we thought we’d
send off one specific query to you.
11/21/2008:
Hey Rob-
Don't know if you've yet had a chance to go through the two rough chapters I
previously sent, or if you have any corrections or thoughts on them (as I
say, they are more theoretical and point the way we will approach things and begin to hang all of the new info on their bare bones), but if you
are interested I think perhaps we'd like to send more chapters to get your
feedback and impression-
Your reliance on some very old correspondence with Penny Wilson to make some case about either you or Rob is misplaced, Oma.
A lot of water has flowed under the bridge in terms of what a number of people (an ever growing number, by the way) now know about you and your history.
In fact, when you showed up on the King & Wilson forum and started your tired old shtick about dewey-eyed carousel rides and horses, Penny and Greg just decided to pull the plug on that forum, knowing that when you and your inane pollution showed up it was the beginning of the end of any serious discussion of history.
You can rant all you want (and I'm sure you will), but the plain fact is that your showing up and that wine-swizzling Russophile's rushing to the defense of her sweet, innocent friend COMPLETELY was the cause of that forum getting shut down.
If you don't believe it, why don't you contact Penny and ask her yourself? You can post her answer here.
Then we'll post her real answer.
Hey, Oma, exactly when was the last time you heard from your good friend, Penny Wilson?
I repeat: "Justin Edwards", you are not doing your Friend (can I call her Rasputin? Please?) any favors by dancing around the internet like this, issuing ridiculous threats of litigation and making spelling mistakes that a third grader would know how to avoid.
So Penny and Greg are the authors of Fate of the Romanovs? And you know them how?
Rebecca Jordan
Honestly, someone needs to inform Hamou's lawyer that this person is getting his client in a lot of trouble should the district attorney's office read this blog, to say nothing of the rants on the various "Team Hamou" sites.
"Team Hamou." Dear God.
From: Greg King @seanet.com
Subject: Re: Oma Hamou is in your forum
Date: November 29, 2007 2:07:09 AM CST
To: rob@.com
As of today the forum should be locked and no one will be able to post as I'm too busy with my newest book and now my next book to keep up, so this shouldn't be a problem.
G
on 11/29/07 8:34 AM, Rob Moshein at rob@.com wrote:
She is "Alexandra"...
(I removed the email addresses for privacy purposes)
I find this completely mystifying, Mr. Moshein, dear. It would seem that Oma Hamou would want nothing more than to keep information about her criminal activities from spreading further and further afield, especially among the world of Romanov history buffs.
Yet she continues to launch one website after another attacking you, knowing full well that another round of information that discredits her further will likely be unleashed.
As a result of her internet attacks on you, her criminal history has been revealed, her ever-growing list of aliases has been revealed, her career as an identity thief and forger has been revealed, her current legal woes have been revealed, her association with other criminals has been revealed, and now? Her ostracization by serious historians from the world of late Romanov history forums has been revealed.
I simply cannot wait until Mr. Hamou's next horribly ill-advised website shows up. And we know it will, don't we, dears?
However, it would certainly seem to me, particularly in light of this most recent felony arrest, that Mr. King and Mrs. Wilson would be absolutely horrified to know that Oma Hamou is still trying pathetically to portray close bonds of intimacy and shared confidences with these two respected historians.
"Justin Edwards" wrote (now deleted but saved)
I have communications from that same Penny that says something wholly different and she doesn't like you.
I have "communications" from that same Penny that say:
On the Oma Hamou front -- I really think that she is so completely narcissistic that she believes she will be able to talk her way out of anything, even Tsarfan's proof of her conmanship (is that a word?). This can be the only explanation for her continuing to fight it out on LoA. I mean, it's a locked forum with only a couple of handfuls of members -- folding your tent and leaving such a place is hardly a major loss of face. The fact that she didn't take Tsarfan's offer to take her con elsewhere tells me that she has something already in mind for a further con -- perhaps even having to do with something like the "writing prize" that one of her alter-egos suggested yesterday.
The letter that she wrote to Helen -- well, she's just not normal, is she? And again, the narcissism is apparent. As is her complete disbelief in anyone else's intelligence. Oma must think that Helen is one dumb bunny if she thinks that such an "excuse" would be believed.
and
From: penny@.com
Subject: Thank you!
Date: September 27, 2006 10:37:04 PM CDT
To: rob@.com, boba@.com
Thank you both very much for talking to me this evening. I was on the edge of being stupid because I was so overwrought. But you guys gave me some good advice, and I do appreciate it -- and I think you again for being good friends.
love,
Penny
Just when exactly were those letters yoiu claim were written about O?
I have my own letters from Penny that describe you as being a control freak basically and Bob a man who if he doesn't get his way will scream and threaten to destroy someone.
I also have letters from Penny that says their forum wasn't closed because of Oma. Either she is lying or you and the document you pretend to have is false.
Now I give you that letters predated from 2004 yep she probably and most likely wrote but I don't know those are letters you if I recall gave to the courts. In your letters you accused O of stealing from Father Markell or she accused him of stealing I don't know Rob you cut & paste things and have a habit of doing this.
Now you want me to say ooooh Penny wrote to you and you are helping them with a new book take a bow means nothing because we are talking specific time periods.
The first one was written May 19, 2006.
The second one is DATED, so clearly both are well AFTER 2004 and in fact were written AFTER you non-suited your law suit and LOST the suit to Bob. You do need to read more accurately.
So, Justin/Oma, you never answered my question. Exactly when was your last correspondence with Penny?
Rob has posted his correspondence from Penny. Why don't you post yours? You've certainly alluded to it enough.
Oma Hamou aka Alexandra McConnell writing as "Justin Edwards" wrote:
Now you want me to say ooooh Penny wrote to you and you are helping them with a new book take a bow means nothing because we are talking specific time periods.
Well, what "specific time periods" are you trying to talk about? FOR YEARS now Greg and Penny have been on the best of terms with me, and Bob. Unlike you, Oma, the rest of the world lives in the PRESENT, you know the here and now. You do have a tendancy to live in the PAST, which is why you keep reposting those same old, worn out badly Photoshopped pictures you purport are "OMA" in her "heyday as a world famous model' (one that nobody other than "Mike Newson" EVER HEARD OF.
As for the here and now, I got this one from them this morning.
The manuscript should be ready for you in another week I hope-just
working on last minute adjustments now. I HOPE it says something
useful!
Best to Bob
and since, Oma/Alexandra/Justin you said: Your facts don't match reality no matter how hard you try to make it fit but you have a history all over the web of ding this just ask Penny. ;)
Can you explain WHY she and Greg are asking me to READ their new book manuscript for my OPINION?
Indeed, just WHEN was the last time EXACTLY you got correspondence from Penny?
I've proven my side. Your turn.
As for time periods, Hamou, it's interesting that you raise that point. What you are missing is that a lot -- a lot -- of information has come out about you and the life you really lead since Penny corresponded with you all those years ago.
You have spent so much of your life in criminal and fraudulent pursuits that it has apparently dulled your awareness of the fact that most anyone with a moral anchor would view an association with you as something to be avoided. (Except, of course, for people who are either profoundly stupid and/or morally bankrupt themselves, such as Michele Biernat at Benefit Design Group.)
When your attacks on Bob Atchison and Rob Moshein occasioned people beginning to take a look at you and your history, most people in the world of internet history forums beat as fast a retreat from any association with you as they could.
So you have some years-old correspondence from Penny? Big effing deal, dimbulb.
Blake,
Not Oma.
It is a Big deal dude when you put all of this into a historical timeline, yep it is a big effin big deal something shows what these assholes have done to my friend and how far they are willing to conive and lie to get her put away for crimes she never committed. Or how about this one, they interfered with her business affairs and wrote letters lying their asses off and posted her social security number on the web and lied to the cops thats a big fucking big deal when you take into consider the impact of their lies, these blogs and web sites they created about her, how they have impacted her life.
Yeh dude it is a big fucking big deal,
Well, Oma, you're going to have your chance to put all this in front of a judge when you go on trial for forgery. Perhaps the judge will agree that you are just a poor victim of everyone else.
I'm sure he'll just be your bestest friend ever.
Oma/Justin (I refuse to believe you ARENT Oma, since Tina, who lived in your house for a long time TOLD me you are pretending to BE Justin so prove otherwise...)
I was going to take this down, but decided to leave ti up for two reasons:
1. it shows how insane you actually ARE. You blather on now for literally SIX YEARS about these time tired old things that you never did prove, that NOBODY ever did anything about, and lastly NOBODY actually CARES
and
2. Oma has done well enough without any help from ME on getting arrested for the Felony Crime of Forging a Financial Instrument. You know that "thing" in Victorville with ALL Those minute orders posted about the progress toward the trial on the merits that may very well send Alexandra Oma to PRISON....
Unless you are somehow alleging that I had anything to do with this? Are you??
Blake,
You obviously have a problem as you like Bob believe no one in their right mind would defend Oma.
Do you know what a pre-preliminary hearing is?
Why do you keep insisting O is going to trial. Why? It is a hearing to determine if there is EVIDENCE to take the matter to trial.
Why would I ask myself anything? Unlike you, Justin/Oma, there's only one person in my head.
Actually, again you completely do NOT understand California Criminal law.
A "pre preliminary hearing" is nothing more than prosecution and defense saying "we are ready to have the Preliminary Hearing. Thats it.
The Preliminary Hearing is a time saving device in California, sometime called the Arraignment on the Information, where the Prosecution must show "Probable Cause" EVIDENCE that the defendant committed the crime. This keeps weaker cases from wasting Court time.
The INTERESTING thing here is notice just WHO most recently asked to delay the Prelim?...
Lets take a look shall we?
7/14/2009 DEFENSE MOTION TO CONTINUE IS GRANTED.
ITS THE DEFENSE!!! You know that lawyer Alexandra/Oma hired... The PROSECUTORS are quite READY to provide their evidence....
Justin, dear. You posted at 11:34 a.m. that you have letters from Penny Wilson about Rob and Bob and also that you have letters from Penny saying she did not close her forum down because of Oma?
Would you please show us proof that Penny corresponded with someone by the name of Justin Edwards? Since you have talked about this correspondence openly, I cannot imagine it would be a problem, dear. And it would certainly help with establsihing your claim that you are not Oma Hamou.
Or perhaps I should ask Penny myself. As we share the same nickname, so we share so much else.
Rob, you know dude you really have this hard on for O to go to jail or prison.
Do you really believe O can't prove her case? Can you prove this Rob?
I know O's side can prove it was a mistake being that there is 3 different accounts connected to the same instrument.
Lastly, do you know for a fact if it was both the DA and Defense who asked for the delay? And O's defense counsel agreed and said something before the DA did?
No you know jack shit but you pretend you do that's what has been the problem.
Online harassment and stalking is never o.k.
Marcus Demian told you he never beat Oma or any of the children and you believed it and posted a statement of fact yet the records shows your a lying bastard so Rob just because you say so and so told you something doesn't make it a fact, now does it.
Justin, dear, my feelings are hurt. I made a simple request, and you are ignoring me entirely while you switch topics left and right.
At 11:34 this morning, you posted:
"Just when exactly were those letters yoiu claim were written about O?
I have my own letters from Penny that describe you as being a control freak basically and Bob a man who if he doesn't get his way will scream and threaten to destroy someone."
Would you kindly show us proof that Penny corresponded with you, Justin Edwards, about Rob and Bob?
It would be most helpful, dear.
Oma/Alexandra/Justin
Dear Ms P. very politely asked you a specific question, twice. And now like BULLY that you are, you are trying to change the topic to avoid answering the question.
Sorry, but anything you post will be deleted until you answer the question from Penelope.
I wonder if Alexandra/Oma's attorney will appreciate you discussing the details of her Defense on the open internet...
I should drop him a line...
Here you go again lying your ass off I have not discussed anything related to O's defense and how do you know I'm not lying my ass off just like your doing?
Back in 2006 here is an excerpt of Penny's letter the other letters I need permission to publish this one I don't.
“…I have to tell you that I've had a pretty interesting week. I've spoken to Bob Atchison several times -- which is unusual…Anyway, long and short of it is he's pretty damned freaked out by what's going on here (Legends), and he watches obsessively. He's asked me to intercede with you guys…I did have a very bad time with them and the treatment I received on their board. They weren't interested in helping out a "friend" then, and guess what? I'm not interested in helping them out now. I told them that you guys had never, ever been anything other than perfectly friendly, helpful and pleasant people.This is my experience with you, and I see no reason to accept anyone else's as more valid. In fact, after my first conversation with Bob (last Sunday), I have to say that I really saw the nature of the beast. I refused to give in to his various demands -- not only concerning you guys, but also concerning Helen…, who has apparently threatened to sue him if he kicks her off his board -- and he went from zero to crazy in nothing flat. I've never seen anything like it. Before he slammed the phone down, he promised to "fuck with me" if I ever fuck with him -- and that he'll write what he "really thinks" …publish it in the NYTimes..."
Rob aka Tonya Koochie Mama one of your alises and the Gilbert MacDuff alises who posted O's social security number on the web.
"Justin Edwards",
You're flailing and you know it. Penelope asked you to produce an e-mail from Penny Wilson addressed to you. Moshein would not be stupid enough to bring a named person into this disaster without the certainty that his assertions about her could be easily checked. Would it be helpful is someone who belongs to the Alexander History forum simply asked Ms. Wilson when the last time she communicated with Oma Hamou was? Or whether she ever e-mailed "Justin Edwards"?
I am a little surprised by this, since from your postings using her name I had assumed that you and Ms. Wilson were friends --- which it now turns out is what I was supposed to assume. It is now certain that you are not, and that you have, in fact, been smearing her name.
It would be such a good idea if you stopped posting. I am sure that Ms. Hamou would want you to stop if she knew that you were posting.
I am proud of myself for typing that last sentence with a straight face.
Rebecca Jordan
Your a real loser fake person by the name of R. Jordan.
Penny did send this to me JUSTIN EDWARDS and more but I am not going to post them. I only posted excerpts ... it was pretty juicy in its content about Bob & All.
Regardless, Penny says she didn't close her history forum because of O participating on that forum, Rob says she is lying. He posts an email from supposedly Greg King but it doesn't say anything about Oma.
Do I know who is telling the truth. Absolutely not. All I have are my communications sent to me by Penny and others which were forwarded to me by Penny that say the same thing in essence.
Tonya Hoochie Koochie Mama Rob Moshein's alter ego and Gilbert MacDuff are all of his known alises while I for what since 2003 have posted like Mike Newson and Jim Sraul under our real names something Bob and Rob have failed to do from the get go.
There are no aka's attached to my name. I have never sued Bob Atchison. I have never been sued. I have never been in jail. I have great credit. I work my ass off at a great job. I have a beautiful family. I have everything a man could want, good family & friends. I have like other defended Oma a friend because you idiots and you are lie your ass off about her life and re-create it. You make fun that she hasn't taken anyone Bob back to the court well that's happening.
Dear "Justin Edwards",
Goodness, young man. She has been preparing to take people to court since the turn of the millennium. And in the only court case in which she engaged Atchison she had her lunch handed to her. So what does that tell you?
In fact you have not answered a single question posed to you, "Justin Edwards", but just for the giggles I will ask you once again. If you are not in fact Oma Hamou (and at this point Helen Keller could see that you are, but just for the sake of argument I will stipulate that you are not), could you please explain why Ms. Hamou allows you to post this crap in express contradiction of her frequently avowed desire to be left in private?
Try to do it without irrelevant digressions into "Tonya Hoochie", although I have to ask --- you can't accept that "Rebecca Jordan" is my real name, but you were fooled by the name "Tonya Hoochie"?
Rebecca Jordan, the real one.
Also, your last post was incoherent. Oh, I forgot. Painkillers from the Irvine auto accident.
Yeah. You're real.
Well the detectives get my answer you say you don't and continue to harass me and my friend Oma Hamou. I say to you the fake asshole whose pretending to be a woman who Pallasart accused my friend of kidnapping go to to hell and eat dog shit while your there. And I did answer your friggen question about Penny writing to me ask her yourself since as a bitch you pretend to say Penny didn't write to me, ask her.
Bye-
Rob,
I talked with O and she doesn't remember the letter you cited on this blog being from Penny. Remember you were forced by court to turn over all documents related to Oma and this one you posted according to O doesn't exist. Was it after 9/2005 or was it a letter before this date if so Rob this would mean like Pallasart did, you deliberately withheld documents.
I know you would never do anything like that ;)
Well, if you're going to call me a bitch and tell me to go to hell, Oma, I guess I can stop addressing you as "Justin".
I will be happy to ask Ms. Wilson.
One more thing, Oma. I never said that you pretended to be me. I never said that you had stolen my identity. What I said was that you had used the same name as mine, which of course is true. Over the years it has bobbed up on the internet, mainly thanks to you if you want to know the truth. Someone on this board forwarded me the posts from the Legend of Anastasia site in which "Rebecca Jordan" figured prominently as a point of discussion. So at least I now understand where that came from. But I am still amazed at the sheer number of false names you have used over the years, Mrs. Demian.
It's a funny old world, isn't it?
Rebecca Jordan. There is only ONE Rebecca.
Ummm, poor drunken stupid Oma Hamou aka Alexandra McConnell pretending to be "justin edwards"
Now you deliberately defame and libel me by claiming I somehow did not turn over emails during litigation, which is why "oma" would have no recollection of the emails.
LOOK AT THE DATE YOU IDIOT. It is MONTHS AFTER the judgment Bob got against you when a JURY voted 11-1 against you. Talk about deliberate defamation.
Re read the email from Greg, who's subject line SAYS "OMA HAMOU IS IN YOUR FORUM" to which he answered that the forum SHOULD BE LOCKED and therefore OMA HAMOU being there "should not be a problem"...
Really, you should be more sober.
I am afraid, Mr. Moshein, that Ms. Hamou is constitutionally incapable of answering the simplest questions. I truly wonder what is going to happen in court when a judge has the power to gavel her into silence once she begins one of these rants. Since you've actually been in a courtroom with her, does she behave like this when there are real people in front of her and she can't hide behind fake names on the internet?
Rebecca
No, Rebecca, it is not. If she performs according to her usual script then she will fail to show up for a hearing or two because she will be faking an illness, and then she will cheat her attorney out of his fee. I had to laugh when i read that Fake me was claiming he had been in an accident in Irvine. That is vintage Oma Hamou-speak!
Also, I do have a lovely family. I only wish I had a great job because right now I am working my ass off stocking shelves at a convenience store in Honolulu.
Oma please stop using my name and switch to Mike Newson's for awhile? I would really appreciate it. Thanksokbye.
I don't think Penny Wilson has had much correspondence with Oma Hamou since Oma e-mailed Penny that she had rented an office at One World Trade Center in Long Beach. And that was several years ago, although I don't remember exactly when.
Hamou had apparently quickly rented the office to cover her lies after being chided on the internet for claiming to have offices for her unregistered "charity foundation" Sarskaia. Someone called the phone number on the supposed foundation's website and found it went to a community bank that had never heard of Sarskaia.
If I recall, someone then posted the office address at the World Trade Center on the internet, which sent Oma Hamou into a pisser of a rant.
We were all laughing our asses off about it at the time.
I wonder if Oma's current lawyer knows about all those fraudulent charity antics back in the day.
And oh, yes, Oma. Penny most certainly did close King & Wilson to keep you, your cheesy melodramas, your self-promoting lies, and your perpetual vendetta against Pallasart from taking over that forum.
I think it was the sappy crap about carousel rides that drove her over the edge. Penny is romantic enough, but it was just way too maudlin for her.
None of you have proven I am Oma, not one person. Rob says Tina told him this well as Judge Livingston told him in court that's not good enough. As for Penny, I don't believe she closed her forum because of Oma because she says something totally different in emails to lots of people. I don't believe Greg King sent a letter to Rob saying this and later if they prove he really did write the email Rob posted I guess the question will be why?
So Rob you've proven nothing O and that bit about Sarskaia liars liars liars you just lie so be prepared to prove it.
I spoke to the detective who took my complaint about the nut who is impersonating me on this blog he's been reading what you assholes are doing, I proved my existence and yet none of you have. None. Mike Newson proved his existence and so has Jim and SANDMAN who lives in Austin, Texas so we've all proven who we say we are but none of you have. Btw, ob said Oma was Anastasia Davis how many times do you think he has hurled this accusation at people, that they are Oma and he knows with certainity?
Too many times.
Ka-ching!
Bob they are re-opening the murder for hire case that THE COPS CLOSED because it lacked any evidence to support what you said happen. Guess what dude, Oma insisted, begged them to do this so I wonder Bob will they arrest you for this lie?
Got all your records? No sure you don't because you don't but not to worry all your phone records and everything is in the original complaints and there were many comlaints in no less than 2 states and Federal level. Who do you think a jury will believe this time? The cops or the likes of you? *snicker****
I told the truth about the murder for hire plot.
In my court case against you I testified truthfully. There were no forged documents as you claim.
I won. You lost.
I have a judgment against you that is now $23,000.
Can we make arrangements for you to pay, Oma? You have been ordered by the court to pay.
I am not Oma, Bob but I have read the trial transcripts and in it you and your attorney lied. The document you provided the courts at trial was not a true representation of the actual invoice provided to O by your company. If O really did owe any money it would've been to your company not to you where you cut & pasted all of those phony emails underneath to make it look as if it was the real invoice. That's called forged documents. You lied in court and your attorney saying Enigma and Pallasart had an existing lawsuit in Texas that's what is in the court transcripts the District Court calls you a liar and your attorney because other than the then existing lawsuit there was no other lawsuit. That's called perjury. As to the Lupoli matter the man who your company designed a web site for, well, your first statement to the APD the patrol guy then your subsequent statements to other law enforcement agencies in Texas and California plus your phone records Bob and the Lupoli's phone records and that first email sent to you by Patricia that all proves you made the story up just because you believe Oma deserves to be in prison. Those kind of records certified emails and phone records are what blew a hole in your murder for hire plot, it never happened and even your attorney or then attorney was forced to admit to this. O wants them to re-open it and prosecute you for this and lots more so hope Bob you can prove your telling the truth cause the evidence like in the last round doesn't support your claims. You forget the lies you've told to people but they are recorded so if you can lie on a witness stand and to cops who knows when you are telling the truth. I don't know you. I have never met you. Don't want to meet you. But I wonder why someone so smart as you seem to be are so obsessed?
PS AOL confirmed Enigma never received your emails about this murder for hire plot, you faked the time stamp on one of those emails AOL confirmed this so much more.
PSS I never sued you and you never sued me therefore you won nothing in court.
Thanks Bob!
PS If you want to ask OMA something Bob you have her email address its been the same since 2000.
Thanks :)
Oma, the jurors heard all of this from you in court and they didn't believe you.
They believed me. 11-1 in my favor.
I won, you lost.
I told the truth about the murder for hire plot. People can judge who they want to believe, me or you.
Bob I am not Oma.
Neither is Mike Newson or Anastasia Davis. We are not Oma. So with that in mind, Bob the court transcripts are a record of what was said and not said. Had your attorney and you not lied about there being another lawsuit in Texas and had you provided the court with the real INVOICE from Pallasart to Enigma I am certain Bob the JURY would never have ruled in your favor. It is in the official record. You lied. The invoice you manipulated to look like the original invoice was not and is not the real invoice. As to the fact you won your case against Oma, true but you did it not honorably but as a liar and a coward this is of course my own opinion.
As for the murder for hire plot the cops in no less than 2 different states and the Fed who you reported it too dismissed it because as they said there was no evidence to support that you were telling the truth. None, zilch. So who will the DA believe you or the law enforcement who investigated your phone records and emails belonging to both you and the lupoli's?
Oma, you made these same arguments in court. The jury heard you. They heard me.
11-1 I won, you lost.
You owe me $23,000.
I told the truth about the murder for hire plot. As I already wrote, people can decide who they want to believe, you or me.
It is as simple as that.
Yes Bob Oma did make these kind of arguments in court. But your attorney said the documents were from a prior lawsuit in Texas and so did you and in the trial transcripts O asked the court to call the clerks office to verify she was telling the truth, in that there was no other lawsuit filed in Texas other than the then present suit. That is the point your attorney and you lied as there was and never had been a prior lawsit filed in Texas Bob between your company. That is why the jury didn't see things because the Judge believed your attorney and you over Oma. As to the murder for hire plot you told people the cops believed you but couldn't prosecute Oma because of state lines, that's so silly because they could've and would've its the truth is there was no evidence to support what you were saying was the truth. There was nothing Bob. See Bob if you hadn't lied in court and gave false testimony I would have been one of your cheerleaders and been on your side against Oma. But you lied and you tricked the court and I hate people who do this kind of thing. Again Bob and the record will bear it out I am not Oma. For the record Rob was told to sit outside so he could ot possibly have known what you said.
I do not owe you $23,000 but according to the judgement you got under false pretenses Oma does. I have never met you. I have never been sued by you or sued you. Tell me Bob why did you pretend Oma made Father Markell homeless when he still owns his home and he has told the cops he never co-signed for a loan for Oma so why did you say this? Why did you drag his name through the mud when you attacked Oma?
Bob do you know the church wrote and called you a liar that they have never called Oma Satan's Mistress now we learn it wasn't the church or one of its priests who supposeldy told you this but some old women. Then why tell people the church said this when if at all it is true not say some women in Father Markell's church said this. Just wondering....
And Bob if the murder for hire plot was real as you say it was then why did your attorney agree it wasn't? And if it was real then why was Oma not charged with committing that crime after all you claim she hired Lupoli to end your lawsuit against you but you forget she countersued you.
Just wondering...
Bob why did you say Mike Newson told you he had given Oma Lupoli's name to kill you when in a sworn affidavit to the FBI and others he says he didn't do this. Why did you lie?
It is these lies coupled with the record of your phone and lupoli's and other communications that were certified by AOL and elsewhere that proved you made it all up to put Oma away for crimes she never committed only in your head.
Had I for one second belived she was capable of doing all that you said she did I would've supported you, turned on her without blinking an eye lash. I read what Father Markell wrote about you and your lies you told about him, I read everything including the trial transcripts and nothing you say or publish as the truth is the truth.
I don't understand why you hate Oma so badly and why you dragged the church into the mud.
Oma, I have told the truth about the murder for hire plot.
People can read these many postings you have put up and draw their own conclusions about who is telling the truth and who isn't.
I would like to tell my story to the DA who has brought charges against you for Forgery if it would help them in their case.
Bob I am not Oma.
Let's let reality hit you on your face. Back in 2003, 2004 you contacted the police in many different jurisidiction and told them that Oma made a priest homeless you even told this to the US State Department and told them lots of lies, I say lies because in their reports they call you a liar. The fact that you right now want to call the DA in the present case like you did to the OC detective in 2004 who asked you do you have any proof all you said was no but you were working on it. You call the DA that is your perrogative but in the end it will work against you because the official records which will be provided by the law enforcement aggencies will show that your lying and have an axe to gring not to mention the civil suit with the trial transcripts. You are a stalker, you are a danger to my friend, this is a fact what ever you may say will not have an impact on her situation just like your statements to the OC detective in Irvine, your lies are recorded and it isn't her that shows this but the police record people who investigated the alleged crimes you claim she did to you. You even tried in 2003 to get the Beverly Hills Police department to arrest her for fraud they didn't beleive you and told you to get lost. I guess I will have to tell Oma to let her attorney know that one of her stalkers by the name Bob Atchison is gonna say lies because he wants Oma in prison so he needs to provide the DA with the police records about you Bob, about your lies and credibility. You have none this is what the FBI says about you, you lied and you lied in court documents so you can pretend this and that but the trial transcripts your forged document versuses the real documents your inconsistent statements show you to be a lying bastard. I will call her right now it is 11:35 PM here in LA so she can have her attorney talk to the DA. You have no credibility in the official records once they read what the cops have to say about you and your lies it has no impact but your lies have impacted my friends life in a devastating way.
Thanks for the head up.
Bob as for the murder for hire plot let me tell you that too is in the police record they call you a liar, a liar the BIG BOB ATCHISON they say has an axe to grind the story you is different than the one told by Lupoli. You made it all up your phone records and the first email you got from Patricia never says, hey call us we have something urgent to tell you someone hired us to kill you, nope it says something totally different. It was you who called several times to them not them calling you and that's when the plot to put Oma in prison for crimes she never committed was cooked up, because you think your doing society a favor.
But your sticking your nose into O's business will again work against you cause it shows a pattern of behavior since 2000 and this too will be shown to the DA all your lies documented, not just this one time but lots. How about Detective Fortune who wrote to Dave Slater and said he didn't believe you when you said O harassed you and you refused to cooperate with him. If you were a victim you would've cooperate but you didn't. Bob there is mountains of evidence that shows you to be a liar, manipulator and a thief yes a thief because you took money from O and admitted in court you didn't give her anything.
Anything else?
So why did you drag Father Markell's name through the mud when you attacked Oma?
Why did you lie about him and say she made him homeless?
Why did you lie about him and say he co-signed for a loan for her with JP Morgan when in fact he never did.
Why did you lie to JP Morgan?
And why Bob did you post Oma's US Social security number on the web?
You just want to do as you've done in the past to stick your nose into O's life make it your business and try your damnest to put her in prison for crimes she never committed. Hell, you tried to do this with the US State Department and even told them she was doing crimes in Russia and said to everyone they the US department was alerting the Moscow embassy because they believed you. Well the US State Department says your lying, you did fax over to them all of the shit your story about her. What kind of a man are you a man who lies who has no problem dragging the church into his schemes to get back at Oma for what I don't know. This is called a sociopath now do I have a medical degree to call you this nope but you sure in the hell exhibit this. Btw, O is in bed so I left a message.
For the record, most all on this blog believe you are telling the truth. But remember Bob this the police reports and the murder for hire plot you cooked up and all the other stuff against O Dave Slater O's attorney was going to use against you in the 2005 litigation including Priest Markell's testimony against you it was to IMPEACH YOUR CREDIBILITY I read the documents because Mike and I were uploading things onto the FTP sites and using the legal time line software so when Dave got in court he could project it onto the screen. They were also going to use the testimony of the cops who said you talked to them and they didn't believe you after they investigated things.
By the time most of you read this, about a dozen and a half back-to-back incoherent rants that "Justin Edwards" (aka Oma Hamou) posted last evening will probably have been removed.
But here is a quote from the 10:30 p.m. post by Justin/Oma, referring to Bob Atchison:
"That is why the jury didn't see things because the Judge believed your attorney and you over Oma."
Yes, Oma, the judge did believe Bob and his attorney over you. In fact, that is pretty much the history of your numerous scrapes with the law in both criminal and civil courts in several states. That is why you have a criminal history. That is why you have been in jail. That is why you have almost $1 million in outstanding judgements against you. That is why yet another DA is now prosecuting you yet again for a felony.
In your rants last evening, Oma, you listed all kinds of state and federal police agencies and district attorneys who believed you over Bob when you went to them. And you repeated the claims you have made for years that lawsuits are about to be filed, that police are about to pounce, that DA's have indictments ready for signature.
But does Bob have a criminal history? NO. Have any police come looking for Bob? NO. Has any DA filed charges against Bob? NO. Has Bob been in jail? NO. Does Bob have oustanding judgments against him? NO.
The cold, hard facts. Your most implacable enemy, Oma. The cold, hard facts.
Blake, my boy. I particularly loved the post where Justin/Oma wrote of Bob Atchison:
"What kind of a man are you a man who lies who has no problem dragging the church into his schemes to get back at Oma for what I don't know."
This, from a convicted felon who posts soft-core porn shots of herself all over the internet, yet at the same time uses her claimed association with the Orthodox Church to further her fantasy/scam of being a big movie producer and charity matron for the benefit of Russian history.
Check out the shots of her kneeling devoutly in a cheesy prom dress before a baptismal font in some basement, with her hands clasped and eyes raised devoutly toward a peeling ceiling.
Check out her "repentance" and "conversion" to the Orthodox faith (both of which came long before the current felony charges were filed against her).
Check out her being re-christened as "Alexandra". (Well, at least we do know she uses that name these days, although she is both Alexandra McConnell and Alexandra Murphy.)
Yeah, right. Who could imagine someone "dragging the church" into his schemes?
I gotta give you this, Justin/Oma. You're mad as a hatter, but you're some fine, fine entertainment.
Well said, Blake. I went to bed too early, it seems, and missed the fascinating spectacle of this woman losing her mind.
When all of the written nonsense that came pouring out of her last night is examined in the cold light of common day, it is readily apparent that she is pathological. This does not excuse her behavior, but the insanity does at least explain it. I can think of no other explanation for what has happened during these past eight years. To recapitulate as briefly as possible: a con artist named Oma Louise Demian Ashkenazy Hamou, after two decades of questionable activities and brushes with the law, filches a screenplay called As a Matter of Honor and passes it off as her own work. She inveigles Atchison into some kind of involvement with her self-promotion in this matter because she hopes to forge a useful connection with the Alexander Palace as a means of making her work as a "producer" more credible. His company does website work for her. As she has with so many, she stiff him and refuses to pay. There is a lawsuit, and she loses. According to her, she loses because the American legal system fails her utterly. Although I have to wonder, if Atchison was able to get his way so completely, why has he never succeeded in enforcing the judgment? She is so enraged by this loss that she starts website after website devoted to attacking Atchison and Moshein. She invokes prominent historians, all of whom repudiate her as soon as they become aware of her use of their names.
Mr. Moshein, I wouldn't delete any of this nonsense. What I would do is forward a copy of it to her lawyer, along with the information you have that establishes the authenticity of Oma Hamou as the author.
Suing her is pointless, as I don't imagine that she has any money at this point. The deterioration of whatever physical charms she once had probably ensures that it will be difficult to ensnare another old man to support her. And if her records as posted on the internet are correct, she is probably facing a stretch in prison. But at least her lawyer might be able to demand that she remove these websites.
Rebecca Jordan
Thank G-d. I thought Bitsy and I were the only ones who had picked up on that dress. I mean, talk about shiksa madness!
Post a Comment