When one uses a search engine online using my name, and my trade name, The Austin Wine Guy, one finds scurrilous, defamatory and simply out right lies on the Internet results.
As law enforcement seems unable to assist me, and the person behind this campaign to defame me and interfere with my business and profession is what they call "judgment proof" meaning she has no money, I must place this blog here.
I would NOT even have written here, had this person not continually written her own false and defamatory statements herself and aided and abetted other personae writing "on her behalf" for the last three years. If she doesn't want me to say anything about her, she ought not have been continually blogging and writing about me much less aiding and encouraging others to do so as well.
The woman behind all of this goes by many names: Oma Hamou, Oma McConnell, Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Hamou, Oma Demian, Alexandra Murphy, are the usual ones, but there are others.
This woman, Oma Hamou, Oma McConnell, Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Hamou, Oma Demian, Alexandra Murphy and her other aliases have a twenty year track record of FELONY CONVICTIONS, multiple arrests, failure to abide by the requirements of her probation for her felony convictions which lead to more arrests, many many civil judgments against her for hundreds of thousands of dollars, a history of writing bad checks, and currently she was arrested late in 2008 in San Bernardino California on a Felony Charge of Forgery of a Financial Instrument (she seems to have forged a large check) and is currently out of custody on bail and faces the Preliminary Hearing phase of her Criminal Trial proceedings in December, 2009.
Someone else has recently posted a precis of the criminal and debt history of this woman. You can go here to read the specific details for yourself:
http://www.omahamoureality.blogspot.com
She is nearly psychotic in this compulsion because I stumbled onto the actual facts of her past, and present, which do not coincide with the personae she wants to project to others.
This woman, Oma Hamou, Oma McConnell, Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Hamou, Oma Demian, Alexandra Murphy et al, has for YEARS now, threatened me with civil and criminal actions. For years now, NOTHING has happened except more ongoing threats online.
I am called a "criminal stalker". First, being called a criminal is Libel per se in Texas, since I have never been convicted of ANYTHING worse than one speeding ticket. As for a stalker, well, I have no clue where this woman is, where she lives, and frankly I don't WANT to know, nor can I care less. In the words of one of her attorney's, Dave. S. "the faster that woman is in my rearview mirror the happier I'll be" (yeah I have the email he said that to me in.). I WISH NO CONTACT WITH OR FROM THIS PERSON.
I do NOT wish this person ill, or harm. Frankly, I do not care about her. The less I hear about her, the better. That said, no one should ever be subjected to harm or danger. I DO NOT WISH THIS PERSON HARM, nor have I advocated, wished, nor advised anyone to harm her. Such allegations are baseless, wrong and defamatory. I just want he to leave me and my partner ALONE and stop the thousands of pages of defamatory lies she puts up and allows "friends" to post on her website in order to cause me harm.
This woman, Oma Hamou, Oma McConnell, Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Hamou, Oma Demian, Alexandra Murphy has demonstrated she has no credibility. You can read below in previous posts where she has outright lied, most notably when she filed a report about her business with Dunn and Bradstreet that was investigated by them and shown to be completely fraudulent.
Ask yourself if the following make any, rational or reasonable common sense:
This woman claims to be an actress and model, but for a decade steadfastly REFUSES to provide one single shred of evidence to support the allegation, not even a credit, reference or magazine issue. She says only "I was and I don't have to prove it. YOU have to prove I wasn't". Does that make sense?
This woman claims that her three felony convictions were not Her fault, but rather someone else's fault. Does THAT make sense?
This woman claims that her current Felony Forgery Charges in San Bernardino are "just a big mistake" and "law enforcement and the DA" are on "her side" and "believe her", yet they are STILL pressing charges and scheduling hearings. Does THAT make sense??
This woman has claimed for six years non stop that I am being investigated by law enforcement and the FBI. Yet, NOTHING ever happened, I have never been contacted by law enforcement for any reason in those six years other than one speeding ticket. Does it make any sense to you that law enforcement is doing ANYTHING for six years now?
Buddha said Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense.
Look at all the blathering posts she has put up on the internet, and ask yourself, do these things agree with YOUR reason and your own common sense? The answer is obvious.
As you can see, this woman and/or her cronies now LIE, falsify documents and use years old private letters to attempt to defame and disparage me, and Bob Atchison
Many people whom have come into contact with her call her a con artist and scam artist. She hangs out with convicted felons, even inviting these career criminals to live in her house with her.
You can verify all the arrests, judgments etc for yourself with simple online searches.
If you have a judgment against Oma Hamou, Alexandra McConnell or her alias names and you want to collect, or serve her with a Debtor Exam, OR if you want to SERVE her with a suit, she is represented by a lawyer, Brian Watson of Victorville California. Service on him is valid as if you served her herself, as he represents her. Google his address and serve her there...
You are free to email me with your questions, and if you yourself have been a VICTIM of this woman Oma Hamou, Oma McConnell, Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Hamou, Oma Demian, Alexandra Murphy, I encourage you to contact me.
344 comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 201 – 344 of 344Ever since that article I wrote about Oma Hamou's life as a jet-setting business executive and international film producer who ran a charity blew up in my face, I've been trying to get my journalism career back on track.
Good News! I've finally snagged a gig. The Journal of Incredible Coincidences has put me under contract to do a research piece on how often certain things happen to ordinary citizens. At last, at long last, I can put the legacy of Oma Hamou behind me.
Mitzi, Bitzi, Fritzi! Can you believe it?
Anyway, I need the help of my friends and well-wishers on this forum to get my research started. I hope you can email me with your answers to the following questions:
1. How well are you acquainted with the procedures your local D.A. uses when you write a bad check?
2. How often do D.A. offices, police departments, and sheriff departments search your name on the internet?
3. How frequently are you asked to cash checks for friends that just happen to be bad?
4. How many checkbooks on closed accounts do you carry around?
5. How often do you accidentally reach for the wrong checkbook?
6. How many of you have a double digit number of civil judgments against you?
7. How many of you have multiple felony convictions for bad checks in multiple states?
8. How many of you are being prosecuted for felony forgery?
9. How many of you are up against a D.A. who really, really wants to settle the case amicably but repeatedly forgets to bring the documents or information to court that would allow you to settle the case?
10. How many of you have used numerous aliases?
11. How many of you have outstanding warrants against you?
12. How many of you have used other people's social security numbers and been sued due to a misunderstanding about the permission you had to take credit cards out in their names?
13. How many of you mooched off a senile old man and got him enmeshed in legal wrangles that resulted in his losing his life savings and receiving a judgment against him in his late 80's from a credit card company?
14. How many of you have been sued twice (or even once) by your own lawyers?
15. How many of you have been sued by an acupuncturist?
I know it is statistically impossible for any one person operating on the up-and-up to have experienced all the above things. So don't worry about not being able to say yes to every question. My article for the Journal will focus on how often just any two of the above things can happen to normal people.
I can't wait for the article to be published. It's sure to break new ground in the field of incredible coincidences.
Good morning, kitties. What a sunny, exciting day is before us!
Now everybody line up for roll call, please.
Felineus?
Pwfft
All right then. Here.
Mewlie?
Meow
Thank you, dear.
Purrlinda?
Purrrrrrr ... purrrrrrrrrr ... purrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
That's enough, sweetie.
Purrr ...
I said that's enough, my dear. Here.
Felix?
Slurp, slurp, slurp
Felix! Stop that. I can see you're here. I don't need to see everything.
Ah, well. All present and accounted for. Now off you go, dears. Have a good day, and don't kick the kitty litter out of your boxes, please. I'm hosting an elegant little luncheon today, and I don't think I can pass certain things off as especially crunchy mini croutons again.
Dear Mr. Moshein,
Happy New Year! I am glad it is starting off so well for you. I just wanted to say that of course "Snoopy" is not me, of course it is Oma. And Jim doesn't have a clue, he never did.
Happy New Year to Mr. Atchison too.
Justin
So exciting! Nitzi is writing again!
I only wish I could help, darling, with the research, I mean. But I have never been arrested, never used an alias, and knock wood, never written a check on a closed account. And who has so many closed accounts they can't keep track? That makes no sense.
Bitsy called for the new year and says you look wonderful, Nitzi, that the day in court really energized you to get moving again. I'm sorry that the movie hasn't panned out yet, but there's always hope, and this thing looks like it will put your right back in front of the public. And can I just say how much I love the title? Can I?
So all of the stuff you passed along, Robbele, so interesting. I was kind of surprised to hear about the Mercedes because even the Jaguar we used to have in the back yard was newer than that. Also, I'm not so hot with the German cars, if you know what I mean, and I think you all do. When my cousin Bina bought a Volkwagen back in the day the whole family had a nervous breakdown.
So how does this work? If things don't work out for our Ms. H and she gets in Dutch with the police again, will there be a chance that she will have to settle the bill she owes you, Bobbele? Although given the car and the living conditions, I wouldn't be holding my breath.
So what's the deal with the old guys and her? My Aunt Masada used to have a saying, "hers is gold, if you know what I mean", and of course we all did, but surely the gold plating is wearing a little thin if you know what I mean, and I think you do.
So exciting, darlings!
Mitzi Kedem
My, my. It's been a busy morning in Palmdale.
After first denying that there was an outstanding warrant in L.A. county on Hamou, she later admitted there was a warrant but claimed it was issued due to someone stealing her identity. Now she's back to claiming there is no such warrant.
She's also trying to convince people there's no reason to attend court on January 11 or 13 to see what happens to her, since she's going to settle the matter "days before". Nice try, bimbo, except that you lied for months about how every next court appearance was going to be the one when this whole little felony forgery thing went away, and instead you just kept asking for one continuance after another. Hey, it's a short drive, and gas prices are down. We'll be there. Dress nicely.
So, Irvine Police Department is reading this blog in order to assist you? Righto. They're going to lift a finger to help a woman who is under felony prosecution in San Bernardino, who is wanted in L.A. County, and who is racking up new legal problems daily. It's not that hard to decipher an IP address, and we don't really have a problem differentiating the Orange County Sheriff from the Irvine Police Department. No sweat, bimbo. They wear different color uniforms. You'll see.
As for the accuracy of Tina Vanveen's information -- well, she told took us right to the gold mine when she blew the whistle on your felony prosecution as Alexandra Oma McConnell. And the rest is history. Or a really fun zoo tour, anyway.
My favorite. Hamou runs a forum she named "Ask Oma", but she never reads it, never posts there, and only has a vague idea what's going on in the 92 pages that have been posted on the "Rob Moshein and His Lies Thread" where "her friends" constantly post that he's about to be prosecuted for criminal activity, is going to be sued, and has committed perjury -- and that she's going to sue him for defamation.
The woman's stark raving mad. But, frankly, there are days we hope she does manage to stay out of jail. We'd miss the antics of the internet's zaniest tit-cradling, rock-humping, fly-unzipped, shorts-in-the-crack "actress/model".
Just re read these very "insisting" they are "true" statements from "snoopy"...and then assess for yourself if anything said now is any more "believable"...
Snoopy on Wed Apr 22, 2009 12:03 pm
Hike,
Oma has to answer this for herself.
I know I have as of yesterday delivered documents to an attorney Oma has hired someone she paid to write a brief for her to set aside the judgement Bob obtained in 2005 against her based on the facts,
Well, THAT never happened....
and on the same date:
I know she has written and may have already today sent the letter to Texas State Bar about Bob's attorney,
Well THAT never happened, or nobody at the Bar gave a damn...
and:
I know she has spoken to the LAPD and has an appointment to meet with one of the detectives who told her in the past they would help her, so, I guess she is going to sign the affidavit or whatever it is and agree to see it through this time.
Now THAT really never happened or nobody at the LAPD bothered or cared to do anything about it...
and:
I know the attorney she hired is gonna file a brief in Federal Court, I know this because the man told me yesterday when I dropped off some of the digital records I've been keeping safe for her,
and we all know THIS never happened either.
Like anybody really takes "team hamou" seriously? I mean other than Oma of course...
My dear, beleagured Ms. Hamou/McConnell (now that you've dropped the use of Ms. Murphy's name, I suppose we can dispense with that), I do hope you are in the mood for some very well-meaning advice.
First, I see you have acquired yet another new friend -- one "Charlie" -- who, like all your other friends, does not understand the difference between "your" and "you're". Might I suggest, my dear, that you run a little seminar for all your friends on the proper use of contractions and possessives? I know you are financially stressed right now, sweetheart, but you really should hire someone to teach the seminar, as I fear you're (note the spelling, dear) not quite up to the task.
Also, you might want to take something to court other than a clutch purse, dearest. I know it looked very chic and was a subtle way to signal the judge you really don't carry an array of checkbooks on you at all times. But I really don't think it's going to make much difference, pet, if you can't come up with the money, and at least you won't have to carry your cell phone in your hand in open court if you have a more capacious bag. It is a courtroom, my dear, not a fashion runway.
Oh my good God, she certainly is on a tear in the new year!
Seriously, Oma, you seem to think that the police work on projects long term. That may be true if they are trying to uncover al-Qaeda operatives, dear, but not penny-ante grifters and their problems with putative stalkers. I use the word "putative" because you have failed to demonstrate that any harm befell you because someone watched you in a public courtroom.
If it makes you feel any better, and it probably won't, Bob Atchison probably feels about you the same way you do about Tina. You try and help someone, you do the best you can for them, and the next thing you know they are bouncing checks all over the place and dragging your name through the mud. On the other hand, Tina hasn't spent the past several years mounting increasingly venomous attacks on you through the internet, and you have done that to Bob. I assume it is because he had the cojones to actually drag your butt into court and actually win. Mrs. Batchelor must have a certain amount of esprit as well, since she will apparently be in a position to pull off something even Bob hasn't been able to achieve --- you will actually have to give her the money you owe her. American Express and Elsevier must be gnashing their teeth in jealousy.
But now it appears that there is another mess looming right after the Batchelor disaster is cleared up --- assuming that your "bank" releases your "funds". By the way, I have refrained from commenting upon this. But what the hell, right? I work for a bank, girlfriend, and they "release" money per a simple request. It's called a withdrawal slip.
Oh, anyway, the next two weeks should be interesting. Rob, you will keep us posted as to whether the police come knock, knock, knockin' at your door? oma, will you do the same?
No. I didn't think so.
It is so cold here. I just took Frobisher for a walk, and I thought my ears would fall off.
RJ
Thar she blows!
Sigh...
Oy Mitzi,
YOU will understand. I can only say
"Ma Nishtana Ha Lyla Hazeh Mikol Halayloht?"
So for the eight millionth time in six years, Oma Hamou has for "really honest" filed yet ANOTHER in a long line of "criminal complaints" against us. Yeah, right just like when "snoopy" said back on April 22 of last year
I know she has spoken to the LAPD and has an appointment to meet with one of the detectives who told her in the past they would help her, so, I guess she is going to sign the affidavit or whatever it is and agree to see it through this time.
and
I know the attorney she hired is gonna file a brief in Federal Court, I know this because the man told me yesterday when I dropped off some of the digital records I've been keeping safe for her,
All of these and many other statements were made with equally the same vehemence and insisting they were true as everything said today.
Why should this day be different from any other day? It shouldn't...
Oh, the new surprise is about the Bill of Review (which can't be heard as a matter of law anyway, but lets humor Hamou for a day or two on this one...)
Oh, "snoopy" DO PLEASE post that "he letter sent from the court Oma has to send the amended pleadings in before such and such date"
I insist you prove this one... You see, the Court will NEVER EVER EVER advise about "such and such dates" for filing anything, THAT is called "practicing LAW" and the Courts will NEVER do that. Ever. Really, show us that letter...
(here's a hint of things to come..."IF" the court had told her, she would know its TOO LATE"....)
I so love it when "team hamou" is SOO adamant about things they really don't quite understand.
The really great part is once the bill of review blather is over with, which will be soon, Oma Hamou will NEVER have any legal reason remaining to refuse to pay Bob his judgment, and, this is not a threat, as it is Bob LEGAL right, to demand she attend a Debtors Exam and pursue all legal means to satisfy his judgment.
Team Hamou has this bad habit of saying things about which they haven't researched the veracity.
It's sad, really, to watch them in the five year old child mind set of "Uh HUH, Yeah...UH HUH it IS SO", but, well, they just don't get it. Comes from a total lack of homework and research. Pathetic really....
Notice the total panic mode now? Threats, always unsubstantianted as usual, of police investigations...the poor police, Oma Hamou has insisted she has filed complaints sooo many times over the years, you'd think they tell her to go away....ah well. I'm not losing sleep expecting a "knock at the door" any time soon....
Night y'all. Russian Christmas party was a great success, lots of fun and great food and wines.
Ladies and gentlemen, I am rather disappointed in you. Generally your ideas for breaking through all the nonsense and getting at the truth of what's going on with Ms. Hamou (aka Alexandra Oma McConnell) are top notch. However, you've let her steal a march on you recently.
She is the one who had to come up with the idea of showing your posts to Judge Allen, supposedly to demonstrate to him how the proceedings in his court are being misrepresented. How did you people let this one get by you?
Don't you think Judge Allen would like to see the posts you printed out where Ms. Hamou insisted she has wanted to settle the matter with Mrs. Batchelor for months -- how she tried to get Mrs. Batchelor to ignore the initial forged check and accept a valid check before the police got involved; how Ms. Hamou showed up ready to pay a couple of months ago, but the D.A. forgot the paperwork; how Ms. Hamou wanted to bring a cashier's check to court several weeks ago, but the D.A. had failed to let her or her attorney know the amount due; how Ms. Hamou had nothing to do with all the continuances, which were forced on her by a derelict D.A
Judge Larry W. Allen is the Chief Judge of San Bernardino County. I'm sure he'd like to know how the local district attorney is gumming up the court docket with all these delays and how Ms. Hamou is posting about it on the internet. His Honor can be reached through the San Bernardino County website, or I can forward any messages to him you want to send me. He takes the smooth administration of justice rather seriously. As an officer of the court, I'm sure Mr. Watson would want to assist this effort in moving things along, too.
Given that Hamou told Messrs. Atchison and Moshein that she was the beneficiary of a $65 million trust fund, my guess is that Judge Allen will be extremely put out by her refusal to cough up the paltry sum she owes Mrs. Batchelor for house rent. I wonder how many other of Mr. Watson's clients have such resources at their command. (And I wonder of how many of Mrs. Batchelor's tenants have had such vast wealth at their disposal.)
On second thought, perhaps you might want simply to copy this post into an email to Judge Allen's office. (Remember to point out that Ms. Hamou is appearing in his court as Alexandra Oma McConnell, her current name of choice or convenience.)
Judge Allen should be highly amused by all this. Or perhaps not.
Hedley, when Hamou gets her tail in a crack she starts spewing out the most insane shit to try to make it appear that everything is working out just the way she wanted.
She's going to Judge Allen about anything? Yeah, when pigs fly.
Take, for example, her "explanation" about why Tina Vanveen got in touch with Moshein. It was all part of a master plan Hamou worked out with Vanveen.
Hamou wanted us to know the newest name she was using. Hamou wanted us to know she was being prosecuted for another felony related to writing bad checks. Hamou wanted us to know she couldn't come up with rent money. Hamou wanted us to know she sat in jail for weeks trying to make bond.
Various police agencies have been directed to this blog by Hamou because she wanted as many police agencies as possible to know what she's up to these days.
The woman is brain dead if she thinks any of her "explanations" make any sense to anyone.
I do think, though, that it's a good idea for us to forward your post to Judge Allen. He really ought to know how his proceedings are being characterized on the internet by a defendant before his bench.
To team hamou,
Go back and re-read the case law I posted that is without question on the point that someone who failed to file an appeal of a judgment or a Motion for New Trial is PRECLUDED as a matter of law from seeking a bill of review.
Also, I suggest you do some research, all I'll give you is this much:
A mere filing of a petition, in other words, does not toll the statute of limitations. See, e.g., Ellis v. Great Southwestern Corp., 646 F.2d 1099, 1112 (5th Cir.1981); Zale Corp. v. Rosenbaum, 520 S.W.2d 889 (Tex.1975); Rigo Mfg. Co. v. Thomas, 458 S.W.2d 180 (Tex.1970).
Merely filing a lawsuit is not sufficient to avoid the expiration of a statute of limitations. See Boyattia v. Hinojosa, 18 S.W.3d 729, 733 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2000, pet. denied).
The rest will have to wait until whenever you really "do" get around to doing something on the bill of review, then you can read it in the Motion for Summary Judgment/Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to TRCP 13.
Dear Oma,
By all means, stick with your current legal people. You have always been so well served by them in the past. These would be the same legal eagles who advised you to fill a bill of review against yourself?
In fact, girlfriend, I would take your own advice. Pull down the websites attacking Moshein and Atchison, pack the cats in the back of the Mercedes (they can't hurt the upholstery after sixteen years), and get the hell out of Dodge. I have read through your site in its' entirety, and I have read through what Rob has forwarded me of the Legend of Anastasia site, and honeybunch, you started this mess and you need to finish it.
Will you take the advice? Probably not.
You have yet to explain how people being a public space constitutes "stalking". I know . . . ask that crack legal team and the D.A. to get right on it. Blake is right; someone should forward all of your posts to Judge Allen, and see if he disagrees with the characterization of what happened in court.
Rebecca Jordan. In 2010, there is still only one Rebecca!
No, I don't think she is going to take the advice. She is now ranting that Judge Allen would a) think it was stalking that someone was in a PUBLIC COURTROOM watching a PUBLIC EVENT, and then simply posted what he/she had seen. Think of the person as a reporter, Oma.
You have certainly been posting that it was the district attorney who asked for the continuances since last summer. Is that true or not?
Your explanation as to how banking works is ridiculous.
Indeed, the entire story as it has unfolded is ridiculous. Mrs. Batchelor is either terrified of you or she is taking you down, which is it?
There's still time to rassle the cats into the car, grab a McFlurrie on the way out (I like them too! We have something in common!) and bust a move to greener pastures. Perhaps you could do well in a retirement community in Arizona. Fresh meat!
RJ
My God, Oma. It doesn't occur to you that the cops are reading your forum and this one for different purposes? It probably doesn't, but girlfriend, my own legal eagles have pointed out several times that between your nonsense over there, the Legend of Anastasia, the Oma Hamou Report, Forum, whatever the hell else is out there, there is already more writing about your past on the internet than can be found about Scarlett O'Hara's in Gone With the Wind. If the police are trying to put a case together against Atchison and Moshein, they are taking longer than the New York City D.A. did to go after the people who attacked us on 9/11.
It isn't going to work, Oma. Take your wormwood like a good girl and get over it.
Rebecca, your long-lost McFlurrie Twin
Alright, Oma --- I can't call you "Snoopy", sorry, not after it has become blatantly obvious since I first engaged with these forums that there is only one other person posting on Team Hamou's site, my BFF and yours! --- you need to talk to a lawyer, any lawyer, and get him or her to explain what a legal time line is, how it works, and why there is nothing like that in place for you here. Hell, girlfriend, you have less knowledge of the legal system than anyone I know, especially considering how much time you have spent entangled in it.
Rebecca McFlurrie
Bwhahahahahahahaha!
I was suggesting that you get out of town because otherwise I think you will be in more trouble, girlfriend, and that's not good. And if you go back into the slammer who will take care of the cats? And while McFlurries are a little menacing (consider the size of your ass!), I don't actually think that they are life-threatening.
Mt. Hamou is blowing its top, darlings. She is now shrieking "yaaaay" at the end of her posts. According to Oma, the police are assembling the information. It must be like those 1500 piece jigsaw puzzles my late husband Chaim, G-d rest his soul, used to do all of the time. Of course, even Chaim could finish one of those in under nine years.
So who do you think did the questionnaire for Nitzi and was the most help? Gomer! Can you believe it!?
Oy, so exciting!
Mitzi Kedem
For the last time, Nitzana never did an affidavit, Omele and you know it. You wouldn't know her if you fell over her, either --- you didn't notice her in court, did you?
I don't understand all the explosions on the "Ask Oma" forum about getting in touch with Judge Allen to let him know what is being said about him, the D.A., and the discipline in his courtroom. It was, after all, their (meaning her) idea.
Anyway, I have some friends in the San Bernardino system, and Judge Allen's secretary Dana Tyler is a fine woman. While the judge won't let his email address be given out, Ms. Tyler will be glad to forward anything on to the judge that bears on the conduct of business in his court.
I'd recommend giving her a call. I have her phone number if anyone wants it.
All this screeching about stalking by attending a public court proceeding is, of course, the utter nonsense all of you are pointing out it is. It certainly won't ruffle Judge Allen's feathers. In fact, half the people in any courtroom on any given day are there observing proceedings for some purpose ancillary to the trial itself, and every judge knows it.
The stroke Ms. "McConnell" seems to be having arises from her horror at the prospect that her bluff is going to be called about Judge Allen and about her version of how the case was proceeding over the past few months. Just a week before the next round in front of Judge Allen is probably not the timing "McConnell" would choose to have Judge Allen hear from anyone here.
Dana Tyler. Nice lady.
Ask yourself, does the following sound anything like a person who feels "bullied, terrified, and afraid to pursue criminal complaints???
by Oma Hamou on Sun Dec 30, 2007 7:40 pm
It is because of you that I have found the strength to continue my struggle for real justice against Bob & Rob and their "people" of course this includes my ex husband, Marcus Demian. This is going to be an awesome year!
by OmaHamou on Sun Feb 24, 2008 11:08 am
I hope Bob and others close to him will go to jail for what they've done and learn/accept that this kind of behavior is unacceptable. I hope the courts will grant me a permanent restraining order against ALL of them. Lastly, I believe justice will vindicate me.
by Oma Hamou on Mon Mar 10, 2008 4:59 pm
I am very hopeful that in the coming months Bob and Rob will be found guilty of the crimes they have committed against me which I hope will prevent future threats of harm to anyone!
by Oma Hamou on Sun Mar 16, 2008 11:49 am
I will not rest until Bob Atchison, Pallasart and Rob Moshein are held accountable for the crimes they've perpetrated against me. Despite what Rob Moshein published on the web about this matter, prosecutors have assured me a verdict based on 'amongst other things' fraud can be overturned and the person perpetrating the fraud can go to to jail and/or be convicted of having committed the crime. ... will never get over it as you say, until Bob Atchison, Pallasart and Rob Moshein are held accountable for their actions and/or are convicted for the crimes they've perpetrated against me.
Two years ago, still nothing. Nope, I don't see fear or being bullied either.
Posted on the "Ask Oma" forum a few minutes ago:
"They are now trying to get people to call up a Judge's secretary, and since all those characters seem to have real issues with telling the truth, one must assume that they are going to tell more lies about Oma in an attempt to derail the civil compromise in their obsessive attempts to cause harm to our friend."
Perish the thought, muffin.
We're just going to send over the posts that were put up on the "Ask Oma" forum about how the D.A. forgot to bring paperwork to court, how Oma was prepared to obtain a cashier's check but could not get the amount of the settlement from the D.A. in time for court, how Oma had the money in her bank account before the last appearance but the bank wouldn't release it to her, how Oma could have as easily had Mrs. Batchelor prosecuted as the other way around.
No need to embellish. Oma's "friends", who assure us they have intimate knowledge of the proceedings as well as slews of legal documents from Oma relating to all sorts of matters, have supplied all the words necessary to paint the picture for the judge.
Sorry, Oma. But I'll never forgive you for the way you led me around by the nose when I wrote that story on you. YOU COST ME MY CAREER!
Nitzana, just curious, how come you don't "talk"/write like your sister, Mitzi?
Darling Russophile Lady,
I was basically brought up in Brooklyn, but Nitzi and Bitsy were educated in Israel and England. And of course the family was doing much better by the time they came along, so no expense was spared on their education. But trust me, when we're all together we chatter like a bunch of mavens.
I sound like an American Jew, as darling Omele puts it, because I was born in Brooklyn.
Mitzi Kedem
Dear "team Hamou"
Consider this my permission for you to copy anything I have written here on this blog and any comments made on this blog and send it to Judge Allen in the San Bernardino Court, Victorville. I have nothing to hide, you are quite free to send him anything I wrote here. Heck give him my phone number if you want to. Happy to talk to him.
Happy to talk to law enforcement OR the lawyers advising you on the Bill of Review, who for some odd reason will consult with you but not actually REPRESENT you or put THEIR NAMES to what you file. Anyone else find that 'odd'? I knew you did.
Nitzana,
You need to add this to your "Journal of Amazing Coincidences' article...
NOW "Team Hamou" is claiming the "lawyers" who are "advising" Hamou are SOOOOO afraid of me and Bob that they told Hamou she had to go by herself or "in pro se" because they are just too "scared" to put their own names on the legal papers....
No, really, 'snoopy' said this....stop laughing, they really said this....ok, laugh, it's really stupid...hehehehehehehehehe
AUCTION NOTICE
On offer is a large satchel full of documents in varying condition. Some documents appear to be legal in nature, although the letterheads of several appear to have been altered or added at a later date. Other documents are highly melodramatic, often shrill in tone, with sundry typing and spelling errors. The word "your' is invariably used to mean "you're", no matter who the putative author of the document. Many documents bear orange stains or sticky patches that appear to be melted ice cream. However, most remain legible, if not always readable. Many points are repeated, sometimes verbatim, throughout many of the documents. The experts who examined the documents have labeled the writing style as "overwrought". Emoticons are often added by hand in the margins, with "great point!" or other similar accolade occasionally written in very large letters in magic marker across the top of the documents. There is a vaque urine smell to the satchel and some staining on the edges.
No reserve. Bids must be accompanied by a certified bank check or other proof of funds satisfactory to the auction house. No personal checks, especially on closed accounts.
Buyer must pick up contents in person, as auction staff refuses to touch satchel.
Ok, now the insanity has reached a new and fevered pitch for Team Hamou...
They have sent the "auction" post to "Law Enforcement"! Can you just imagine the look on some poor cop's face when he reads this and has someone expecting him to actually BELIEVE this is for real?? I actually feel sorry for whatever cops Oma Hamou is annoying and wasting their valuable time. I mean there are REAL criminals out there that the police are swamped and strained for time and resources to deal with, you know, people who commit genuine felonies and get arrested and convicted...rapists, thieves, drug dealers, murderers, terrorists, forgers, oh, wait, forgery doesn't count, the DA has no interest in pursuing forgery cases....
NOTICE TO BIDDERS
Bidder Registration forms from the following applicants have been denied for the reason(s) given:
Snoopy
Reason: AKC registration papers are not acceptable identification. (And, by the way, the AKC registered trademark that is used on their letterhead has a blue background, not a pink one.)
Handmaiden von Sayton
Reason: A credit card with the embossed name ground down and a new name punched in with an ice pick is not an acceptable means of payment.
Little Debbie
Reason: A "Little Debbie" proof of purchase coupon is not sufficient identification to bid.
Justin Edwards
Reason: Someone by that name (well, almost) has already registered for this auction.
Sandman
Reason: Sleeping through the registration deadline is no excuse for a registration extension.
Mike Newson
Reason: "Hose & Toes" is not a sufficient reference for opening a business bidding account. And the "Retrospective on Fetishes" auction isn't until next month, anyway.
Oh, who's to blame, that girl's just insane.
Well nothing I do don't seem to work,
It only seems to make matters worse. Oh please.
You better stop, look around, here it comes, here it comes, here it comes,
Here it comes. Here comes your nine-teenth nervous breakdown.
Here comes your nine-teenth nervous breakdown.
I love the Rolling Stones....
Mr. Moshein, dear. I wonder if you and Mr. Atchison could help me.
My very best friend Prunella is having a little trouble with some tenants of hers who are not paying the rent. She has tried to have them evicted, but they have hired a law firm to try to hinder her.
Would you mind if I told Prunella to drop your and Mr. Atchison's names to that law firm and mention that your are very dear friends of hers? I'm sure that would cause them to refuse to help their clients in open court and tell them to do their own filings. And we know how well that would work, right?
Dear Ms P.
I'm sorry we can't be of help on this one. To be honest, Bob and I are on the best of terms with the legal community, despite the insane, deranged blather of Team Hamou...Including a very good friend who has been an attorney in the Texas Attorney General's office for years.
Perhaps Prunella could reach out to Mrs. Batchelor, she seems to have better ways to deal with deadbeat tenants.
I just read the "excerpt" from the "amended" bill of review...
This is a live controversy that would have concluded some time ago had it not been for plaintiff's fraudulent and malicious courtroom hoax and internet antics... Plaintiff''s has proven neither that Ms. Hamou has a legal nor an equitable duty to pay plaintiff. Without the fabricated evidence his complaint would be subject to a no-evidence review, that the judgment should not issue as a matter of law, as not a scintilla of proof against Ms. Hamou has been admitted into evidence... Plaintiff's misconduct begs the question of why did plaintiff forge the emails and invoices? Plaintiff had no authentic evidence so he decided to make some up.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAhahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahhahahahahhhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah*breath*hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA*BREATH*HHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHHHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHHHHHHAHAHAHAHHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!
heheheheheheheheheheheheh hahahahahahahahahahaahahahah hhohohohohohohohohohoh hahahahahahahaah
hihihihihih hehehehehehee hahahahahaahahahahahaahaha
Sorry, its not even the "amended" thing, its just a "supplemental Brief" .... which doesn't even EXIST in Texas trial practice... hahahahahahh
hohohohhohohohohoh
hehehehehehehehe
hahahahaahahahaha!!!!!!! oh, the laughing hurts...hahahhahaha
wait, I can't breathe...hahahahahahahhhhaha
ohhh this is sooo damn hysterical. check this idiocy..hahahahahahahaha
plaintiff's fraudulent and malicious courtroom hoax and internet antics...
hahahahahahahaa
hihihihihhohohohohhahahahaha
hhahahahahahahaahah
oh G-d, I can't stop laughing....hahahahahahahheheheheheheheh
Such a lack of utter comprehension of Bill of Review...hahahahahahahhahahahaha
Such idiotic bad writing...clueless ahahahahahahahahhehehehehehhohohohohho
Can't WAIT to see a Judge's face when they read this stupidity
OHOHOHOHHOHOHOHOHHAHAHAHAHAHAH
Owwwwww, my sides hurt hahahahahahahahahahaah
heheheheehe, really...hehehehehehehehehehehehehe
oh I havent laughed at anything so funny in a year......hehehehehehehee
Oh, g-d too stupidly funny...Didn't the "LAWYER" advising 'team hamou" TELL them that anything that happened IN the trial CAN NOT be part of a Bill of Review??? This is fundamental to the Bill of Review. ONLY things NOT part of the trial can be heard.
Ow...my sides. hahahahhahahahahahahhehehehehehe
oh I can't wait..hahahaha hehehehehe
the utter idiocy....hahahahhahahhehehehehehehe
ouch...hheheheheh ouch heheheheeh
ohhhh .hehhehehe
Oh G-d the idiocy continues. hehehehehehehehehe
Geez these morons were so lazy they did not ever Google "bill of review" or texas..
5 Extrinsic fraud is “fraud that denies a losing party the
opportunity to fully litigate at trial all the rights or defenses that could have been asserted.”106 It generally relates to the manner in which the judgment was procured or involves wrongful conduct
that occurs outside of the law suit.Lambert v. Coachmen Indus. of Texas, Inc., 761S.W.2d 82, 88 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1988, Intrinsic fraud, on the other
hand, relates to the merits of the issues in the underlying case and
either was, or should have been, litigated in the suit.Id. Examples
of intrinsic fraud include fraudulent instruments, perjury Wise v. Fryar, 49 S.W.3d 450, 455 (Tex. App.—Eastland 2001, pet. denied)(or any matter which was actually presented to and considered by the trial court in rendering judgment.See, e.g., Browning, 165 S.W.3d at 349 (alleged fraud involving misrepresentation of company value was intrinsic fraud because the issue of value had been presented and considered by bankruptcy court over two years before state court
suit was filed). As the Texas Supreme Court
has stated: An attack upon a judgment based on intrinsic fraud is not allowed because the fraudulent conduct may be properly exposed and rectified within the context of the underlying adversarial process itself. In contrast, a collateral attack on a judgment on the basis of extrinsic
fraud is allowed because such fraud distorts the judicial process to such an extent that confidence in the ability to discover the fraudulent conduct through the regular adversarial process is undermined.Id. at 348
Idiots
Oh no, Team Hamou, PLEASE go ahead and drop any paperwork over the transom to the District Court here that you want to. It is far more entertaining to watch you waste your time and have the pleasure of "I told you so", like with Federal Court and the appeal, etc etc.
So Why Oma Hamou's Bill of Review thing is pointless (oh and feel free to go read the case law for yourself, I'm not asking you to take my work for this at all)
1. She blew the Statute of Limitations. It's TOO LATE.
A mere filing of a petition, in other words, does not toll the statute of limitations. See, e.g., Ellis v. Great Southwestern Corp., 646 F.2d 1099, 1112 (5th Cir.1981); Zale Corp. v. Rosenbaum, 520 S.W.2d 889 (Tex.1975); Rigo Mfg. Co. v. Thomas, 458 S.W.2d 180 (Tex.1970).
Merely filing a lawsuit is not sufficient to avoid the expiration of a statute of limitations. See Boyattia v. Hinojosa, 18 S.W.3d 729, 733 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2000, pet. denied).
2. Oma Hamou is precluded as a matter of LAW from seeking a bill of review, because she was negligent in failing to pursue her previous options of Appeal for Motion for New Trial.
If a motion to reinstate, motion for new trial, or direct appeal is available, it is hard to imagine any case in which failure to pursue one of them would not be negligence
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
No. 03-0906 9/3/2004
Karen Ann Gold, Petitioner v.
Richard Stephen Gold, Jr., and
Richard Stephen Gold, Sr., Respondents
If a party negligently permits a judgment to become final by neglecting to file a motion for new trial or appeal, then he is precluded from proceeding on a petition for bill of review. French v. Brown, 424 S.W.2d
893, 895 (Tex. 1967).
3. The subject matter of which Oma Hamou complains as the sole BASIS for the thing (ie: Fraud and Perjury) are INTRINSIC trial matters which can NOT as a matter of law be subject to Bill of review.
Examples of intrinsic fraud include fraudulent instruments, perjury Wise v. Fryar, 49 S.W.3d 450, 455 (Tex. App.—Eastland 2001, pet. denied)
As the Texas Supreme Court
has stated: An attack upon a judgment based on intrinsic fraud is not allowed because the fraudulent conduct may be properly exposed and rectified within the context of the underlying adversarial process itself
So please, blather away. It's amusing to watch team hamou talk like they understand things, when clearly they do NOT. It's all in English. Go read it for yourselves.
I do not appreciate being accused of receiving or possessing stolen property. Obviously I will have to sue Mrs. Hamou for libel, slander, and defamation whenever she shows up to sue Atchison and Moshein.
I explained all this to the police yesterday when they showed up to question me about her complaint. They laughed their asses off when I told them that she was already a defendant in a felony forgery case herself.
Team Hamou, thanks for letting us know that Oma Hamou was being investigated by the Los Angeles Police for Theft of "the other woman's" property
The cops who are investigating the group of people who stole this other woman's computer tower, accessed her bank account and other things already talked to those nice people in San Bernadino and found out the case is being settled through a civil compromise, all charges will be dismissed. The cops in Los Angeles know my friend would have never been arrested had Mrs. Batchelor not read Pallasart's libelous site about my friend Oma Hamou and not believed the words represented on that site as being authentic
Cool, not only is Oma Hamou aka Alexandra McConnell awaiting trial for Felony Forgery, but now being investigated by the Los Angeles Police for Theft.
I posted an auction notice for documents on faked letterhead, poorly written, full of melodrama, with consistent confusion of "your" and "you're" on the part of all the supposedly different authors, in a piss-stained satchel.
Now why does Oma Hamou keep insisting this must mean we have her documents?
By the way, the items have been pulled from offer. A private buyer came forward with an offer too good to refuse.
Let me explain this for the clearly dimwitted handmaiden de Sayton.
A bill of review is NOT designed to revisit the issues at trial. Bill of Review was created to assist those who got default judgments against them because of fraud committed to prevent them from knowing they were being sued.
the proper venue to revisit anything that happened at the trial is called an "appeal". You know, that thing Oma Hamou said she was going to do but never did and let the statute of limitations pass, which in considered negligence by the Texas courts.
So much for your, typically flawed, "logic"....
For a "buddhist" handmaiden de Sayton seems to have a total loss of understanding of the Buddha's teachings about compassion and Right Speech....
typical team hamou bs.
Posted by "Snoopy":
"You have committed a crime. The lead detective BELIEVES my friend. BELIEVES her property was stolen. BELIEVES you are in possession of her property and soon he will make contact with Rob Moshein who will either fess up he is IM NOT HER or provide the cops with your name and other information."
My, my, Snoopy. That's quite a list of charges. I assume you realize you have made claims we can use to force disclosure of your real identity, and in the lawsuit that will follow you will have to produce the name of the "lead detective" you say believes anyone on this blog is in possession of property stolen from you.
You'd better hope that "lead detective" gets in touch with Moshein soon and convinces him what you post is true. Otherwise he is going to come after your sorry, check forging, judgment dodging ass as soon as you step into a courtroom.
As for all this crap about how you were going to pay Mrs. Batchelor until she read Moshein's blog, that would be only slightly more believable if you actually had the means to pay her the money instead of going into court and whining about not yet having enough money to pay her -- more than a year after you originally stiffed her.
If your cock-and-bull story that the money was in your bank account but the bank didn't open until 8:30 the day of court was true, your lawyer would not have asked for another two weeks for you to try to scrape together the dough, given how irritated the judge was at the continuing delays.
With these stupid yarns you spin thinking they're going to fool anyone but a fool, you're like a two year old who covers her eyes and thinks no one can see her because she can't see anyone else.
The 11th is just a few days away. How ya comin' on scraping up the rest of that money you owe Mrs Batchelor? Will it be a good day in court for you do you think?
Janet Rasmussen. Mike Pyles. Nick Nicholson. Penny Wilson. Bob Atchison. Rob Moshein.
It must be weird to live in the knowledge that so many people might have reason to enjoy watching you squirm and wiggle around your ever-growing list of lies and legal problems.
Life's much easier at this end. The only ones we have to bother with are Oma Hamou, Alexandra Oma McConnell, Alexandra Murphy, Oma Demian, Oma Chedid, Jordan Taylor, Rebecca Jordan (sorry, Rebecca Jordan at the bank in New York), Oma Ashkenazy, et al.
Oma, you never did tell us how you are faring with that heart condition / anxiety attack that put you in the hospital the afternoon of your most recent court date. How ya doin'? Will you be able to get through next week's appearance?
and don't forget about Helen A. of the "two headed rape baby" tale, Scott L. the party planner who got stiffed for fees, the make up lady who got a bad check, Rio who got a bad check, the PR guy in Florida who never got paid, the PR guy in DC who never got paid, the account rep at Variety who almost lost his job because THEY never got paid, FOUR different law firms who never got paid, the accupuncturist who has a judgment but never got paid, the family of the old man who got an Amex judgment slapped on him because of Oma Hamou, the ex husband that Oma Hamou makes unproven yet serious criminal allegations about, the people in Russia in who's flat where Oma Hamou stayed and she ran up an international telephone bill in the THOUSANDS of dollars they had to pay (which was equivalent to SIX MONTHS of their wages!)because she stiffed them for the money; the person who says they got put in jail because of Oma Hamou...
The list of people who might have a reason to be "miffed" as Oma Hamou aka Alexandra McConnell seems mighty long indeed.
Staying as someone's guest and running up thousands of dollars in phone bills and then leaving them in the lurch? Yep, that's our gal. I guess she's keeping that $65 million trust fund all to herself.
Hey, didn't Hamou say that she was going to pay the settlement in the Batchelor matter days (plural) before the court date on January 11? Well, today is two business days before the 11th. That would mean she's going to pay the money by today at the latest.
Of course, since we haven't yet seen her crowing on her "Ask Oma" forum about having finally settled the matter, I guess we'll have to hope the observers can make it to court Monday and Wednesday, if need be.
Penelope, do you have the knitting ready? Gomer, do you think the car will start? Rebecca, do you have a good cartridge in the fax machine?
All righty, then.
oh wait, I forgot another person who might be a tad "upset" with old Oma...
Mrs. Batchelor. Poor thing has had to wait 14 months and counting to get her rent and the damages all those cats caused to her house. Not only has she not been paid, Oma Hamou's "friends" keep posting all over the internet for everyone to read how EVIL Mrs Batchelor is for having Oma Hamou "arrested" under "false pretenses" and how "horrible" Mrs. Batchelor was for refusing another check from Oma Hamou and calling the police on her instead...SHE just might feel a little "put out" by Oma Hamou and co.
You think?
This "Snoopy" posted again that I said I have documents belonging to Oma Hamou:
"You are the blogger who posted on Rob's blog you were in possession of property belonging to my friend Oma Hamou."
Could you point out exactly where I posted I had any documents belonging to Oma Hamou? Why do you keep lying about this and claiming I commit the crime of trafficking in stolen property? You do know this is libel, slander, defamation and harrassment, don't you?
As for that smelly old satchel full of papers, I don't know why that buyer wanted it so bad, but boy, did he pay through the nose.
I see you're home posting this morning instead of out and about paying the settlement today for Mrs. Batchelor. Did you forget you posted that you were going to settle this matter "days" before the next court date? Which is Monday, you know.
poor dimwit "snoopy" shows yet again how poorly "team hamou" gets their facts correct. "snoopy" says Oma Hamou only stiffed TWO law firms. Let's look at the records:
1. August 5, 2003: WESTAR LEGAL ENTERPRISES, LLC. v. OMA HAMOU ET AL. Los Angeles County Superior Court Case PC033237, Breach of Contract, filed 08/05/2003, Default Judgment issued against Oma Hamou individually and dba Engima Productions for the suit originally filed on 04/23/2004 for an unknown amount in excess of $10,000
2. Feb. 2, 2004: Default Judgment against Oma Hamou personally issued in favor of Freeman Freeman & Smiley LLP for an unknown amount in excess of $10,000.
LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT, West Los Angeles Case 03T02636
3. Foster Malish and Blair LLC of Austin Texas has an unpaid outstanding balance against Oma Hamou personally in excess of $20,000 which Oma Hamou publicly acknowledges.
4. Case Number: 05V09066
CURTIS, SUZANNE M Attorney at Law VS. HAMOU, OMA
02/07/2006 JUDGMENT ENTERED AS A FINAL DISPOSITION ON 02/07/06 .
FOR (CURTIS, SUZANNE M) ATTORNEY AT LAW . AGAINST
(HAMOU, OMA) , (ENIGMA ROYAL FILMS, LLC) AGENT FOR SERVICE
OF PROCESS:SHARI LEINWAND, GIBSON DUNN & CRUTCHER, LLP ,
(ENIGMA ROYAL FILMS, INCORPORATED) AGENT FOR SERVICE OF
PROCESS: OMA HAMOU , (ENIGMA FILMS, INCORPORATED) AGENT
FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS: OMA HAMOU . PRINCIPAL $ 412.50
. COSTS $ 246.56 . TOTAL $ 659.06 . EXECUTION STAYED
30 DAYS. ALL DEFENDANT'S ARE JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY
LIABLE UNCONTESTED
That's FOUR "snoopy", FOUR law firms that have been stiffed by Oma Hamou...
Ask yourself this...
WHY does Oma Hamou aka Alexandra McConnell et al always portray herself as a VICTIM?
Victim of an abusive father.
Victim of an abusive ex husband.
Victim of a son with substance abuse
Victim of "stalkers"
Victim of fraud
Victim of rape
Victim of betrayal by "friends"
Victim of betrayal by her "husband"
Victim of dishonest business deals
Victim of vast "conspiracies" against her
Victim of defamation
Victim of false arrest
Victim of inept District Attorneys
Victim of Banks
Victim of Landlords
Victim of "Identity Theft"
Victim of countless Police agency "mistakes"
Victim of countless "misunderstandings" involving "wrong checkbooks" and "accidental" banking mistakes....
Yes, a total "victim"...When does she ever acknowledge her own responsibility for this mess she calls a life? Well, never. duh.
So Hamou continues to post like crazy but still avoids the question of the moment. Did she pay up for the settlement "days" before her next court date?
Apparently not, as she would otherwise be crowing like a rooster that the felony charges have been dismissed.
Looks like all the observers better be ready for court next week. The bus will pick everybody up at the same place as before. Please be on time because, as Hamou points out, traffic can be a bitch. Unlike Hamou, though, you want to allow for known traffic conditions and be there for the docket call.
Can't wait to hear how it goes. Can't wait.
Thanks to handmaiden de Sayton of team hamou for admitting that Oma Hamou plays a victim, refusing to be responsible for the felony conviction, felony charges huge debt multiple arrest screwed up child three time divorced trainwreck that is her so called life.
Handmaiden wrote:
"I will be very glad to observe who is at court on Monday though and see who gets very disappointed when they find out that we were correct all along about the civil compromise and charges being dropped. Then we will have faces that we just need to match up with names. So, all you stalkers remember, we might well be watching you."
So it seems Oma's plan to pay up on the settlement "days" ahead of trial has not gone well and she'll be in court, after all.
I'll bet Handmaiden will be wearing the same dress as Hamou. Literally.
As for spotting our observers, you'll have to be a dunce to miss them. Penelope will have her knitting needles and be smelling to high heaven of rosewater. She hasn't decided on her frock yet, but expect lace. Rebecca will have an oxblood alligator leather briefcase she wouldn't be caught dead in daylight without and probably be running out every few minutes with a Blackberry glued to her ear. Gomer -- well, you already know him, and he's not really our observer. I think he represents the clan, but we do enjoy the perspective he brings to his posts.
Good God she is off the rails. I always think she is particularly unbalanced when she pulls the "Handmaiden" persona off the shelf and starts being prissy. And as she frequently reminds us, well-educated, although she makes the exact same grammar and spelling mistakes as all of the other figments. It's just so unnatural; you can tell she is much more comfortable cussin' up a down home storm as "Snoopy". Anyway, no matter.
And Blake, I have an iPhone, not a Blackberry, but you were eerily ccrrect about the briefcase. Oma, keep your eyes open in court. I will be the tall woman in the grey suit. Wave! Penelope, save me a seat and a watercress sandwich!
RJ
You are Oma; you have always been Oma, you will always be Oma; you are uniquely . . . Oma.
Night, Oma. Stay prissy, Palmdale.
Rebecca
Morning gang.
Well, 'team hamou' must not have anything new or positive to say since all they can do is show three year old re-runs of yesterday's blather...
Just checked the San Bernardino Court dockets and guess who still will have to show up at 8:30am Monday?? Yeppir, Alexandra McConnell aka Oma Hamou. Since Judge Allen is already not pleased with all the continuances, she ought really be on time. If traffic is such a problem, there is always an inexpensive motel room in Victorville I'm sure for Sunday night, and heck, probably for Tuesday night too since you REALLY don't want to be late for the Preliminary Hearing.
We can't WAIT for the report from the Prelim. For you folks not familiar with California Criminal Courts (and I am having clerked for several high profile Criminal Attorneys in LA) the Preliminary Hearing is where the DA/prosecution sets out ALL their evidence against the Defendant for the Judge to determine if there is Probable Cause to proceed to Trial.
In other words, the public gets to hear EXACTLY what the DA has on Alexandra McConnell to back up the Felony charge.
Can not wait for that!
Stay warm.
Hey now! What's this? Penny Wilson keeps an aluminum bat behind the door for strange or unexpected visitors and I don't and Mr. Moshein, YOU freak out???
I demand equal villification of Ms. Wilson here for her statement!
Penny totally denied writing that letter. If you had been paying attention, you'd have read Penny's answer to me when I asked for her explanation.
Frankly, I don't give a crap about that Penny Wilson stuff of years ago, which all that was. Penny and Greg asked me on their own to help them with the new book. They are adults and get over stuff, unlike others I know...
More interesting is why all of "team hamou" (the made up ones, not you Biernat) have disappeared suddenly. Maybe they are all out on street corners panhandling to come up with the money Alexandra McConnell has to have monday morning or go on to Prelim and Trial.
Prepare yourself, ladies and gentlemen. There will now be a series of outraged posts in which the figments tell us that thay have lives, thank you very much, an despite their unending screeching devotion to Oma Hamou, they cannot be online all the time. It merely seems that way until they all decide to take a collective vacation from the enterprise ofdefending her behaviors.
Rebecca
Good morning to you guys. Hope everyone, other than the So Cal denizens are keeping warm!
Despite the ten or twelve thousand re-posts of re-posts of re-posts of re-posts from years ago, by "team hamou" in the obvious attempt to not have to deal with that pesky little FELONY FORGERY charge which still hangs large over the graying little head of Oma Hamou under her alias name Alexandra McConnell, and despite the "promises" made for two weeks now that she will meet "days ahead" with the DA and pay the money, well, "big surprise"....
As of the midnight update last night of the San Bernardino Court record and docket system, Alexandra McConnell's case is STILL there for 8:30 Monday Morning. She is under Court order to personally appear.
Guess she couldn't come up with the cash, another big "surprise" I'm certain.
Will there be the usual "hospitalization" for some nebulous "emergency" so she won't have to show up? Well, doubtful as her lawyer is too smart for that kindergarten level excuse.
Can not WAIT for the reports to come back from the Courtroom Monday.
RJ: I'll take your bet of a bottle of Mumm's de Cramant that Oma will or will not start screeching and pleading to the Judge that the Courtroom gallery is full of stalkers and she is in fear for her life!
I'll take the "she will not" side as I think her lawyer would advise her she would be locked up on a 5150 (Mandatory 72 hour Pscyh. evaluation hold.) if she went there...
Either way, I wish I could be there to watch the fun.
Good point in your email Blake, worth sharing...
EVERY single time Alexandra McConnell aka Oma Hamou has gone to Court on her FELONY FORGERY charge, "team Hamou" tells us it will be resolved and we "won't like the results"...yet, every single time she doesn't pay up or get charges dropped. well I for one can not WAIT to hear about Monday, and even more so for the Prelim on Wednesday.
Exactly 24 hours until Court Oma/Alexandra. Don't be late. Don't wear those high heels again.
Got all the money? Nobody I know believes you do and all agree you'll beg Judge Allen for more time tomorrow...but he already said no. Prelim on Wednesday where ALL the details of what you did will be made public...
Tick Tick Tick Tick Tick
Once again, total quiet from "team hamou"...OF COURSE it's total coincidence that ALL their "lives" preclude them from posting tody...as opposed to last Sunday when they posted like mad.
Is it another "coincidence" that TOMORROW morning is COURT, and maybe, just maybe "Alexandra" is busy finding some new old men to "obtain" the money she needs for that "civil compromise"...
What ever happened to OLD Jim Sproul (the one I was told is the only real person, who is like TOTALLY hot for Oma, but she only uses him) for another infusion of much needed cash, you know, like he bragged about publicly five years ago when he gave Oma/Alexandra $150,000 to "tide her over"...and yes I have that posting archived...
Poor gray/dyed haired Oma. The Court observer last time was SO specific over and over that you looked so "stressed, tired and hard"...
What will tomorrow's report bring??
Attention all figments! A lifeboat will be leaving her brain at 0500! All figments will gather with their luggage at the embarkation point by 0415!
Daryn
P.S. No cats.
O Mighty Grand Shovel! O Grand Master of the Sacred Orbs of Orando! O Headmaster of the Thetan School of Divinity, Terran Campus! O --- oh, hell, you get the idea!
The White Bronco has begun to move toward the courthouse!!! There is a motorcade slowly following it as she wends her way into town. It will take her some time to get there, as she is traveling at fourteen miles per hour by my calculation, but she is on her way!
Also, we have had a sudden influx of minions! This morning three volunteers arrived at the spaceshi --- err, office --- looking for work, claiming that they had been let go by their previous employer. We now have Minion Leslie, Minion Daryn and a surprisingly undeveloped Minion named Charlie. He is a little shadowy, and doesn't show much evidence of being as well thought-out as the others. But they all know how to do all sorts of things, and claim that they will be adept at concealing your existence as the power behind us all, O Mighty Grand Shovel.
I'm following the motorcade on a Vespa, and texting this entry when we stop at red lights. Oops! We just pulled into a McDonald's! The White Bronco is in the drive-thru line, followed by 27 Secret Service and FBI vehicles. And one Vespa, of course.
More as the story develops!
Not your only minion,
Illuminati!
There was some kind of altercation at the McDonald's that has held up the motorcade. She wanted a McFlurry, and was unable to accept the fact that they didn't serve them during the breakfast hours. Words were exchanged with the young woman taking the order, and after a bit the manager and three other servers paraded out with several of the ice cream treats in a large serving carton. They placed them in the car, took her credit card and came back out after a second, shaking their heads. When they attempted to remove the ice cream treats from the Bronco, a small struggle broke out. Finally, one of the policemen in the motorcade, obviously struck by Her Great Chic and Nice Appointed Living Quarters when they arrived at her home this morning, came over and insisted upon paying for the delicious confections. After a small pause while she consumed a couple of them, the motorcade resumed.
Helicopters are circling overhead as I upload this, and I can see Ryan Seacrest hanging for dear life on a dangling rope ladder from one of them, shouting questions at her.
Oh no! We're approaching an overpass, and I think the ladder is too low and ---- oh my God, there goes Ryan Seacrest!!!
He's all right! He's splayed on the hood of the Bronco, gesticulating wildly for her to stop. But she isn't!
Oh, the humanity!
The humanity!
(Well, it's Ryan Seacrest, so "humanity" may not be exactly the right word, but you get the drift, O Mighty Shovel!)
Your faithful minion
All right, Illuminati. Don't mess this one up.
And watch that turn off the I-15 onto Roy Rogers Drive. Bronco's flip easily, and you don't want her rolling down the ramp onto you.
As for those new recruits -- not just yet. They could be spies or saboteurs. Remember, we still don't know who started that fire on the airplane.
Your Lord and Master,
Me
Illuminati, why have you not reported back? Don't tell me you've screwed up another assignment.
The Bronco made it to court, even if a bit late.
The lady was dressed more smartly today: black pants suit, low heels, and chic sunglasses. She seemed to be spending most of her time peering around the courtroom at the audience, which was spilling out of the place on this busy Monday.
I await a further report of how the matter went from someone obviously more reliable than you, you useless minion.
And how did Mr. Ryan Seacrest fare? Is he safe? I find him one of the most talented of all huma ... er, people and do not understand why he's not a much bigger star on eart ... er, in Hollywood.
If you allowed one hair of his adorable, sandy head to be harmed without coming to his assistance, Illuminati, there will definitely be an opening for a new minion.
Oh, I forgot.
Your Lord and Master
The Grand Shovel
Can I just say how much I liked this outfit as compared to the first one? The sunglasses added that Jackie/Audrey touch that really makes an ensemble sing!
RJ
Oh, drudgery, my dears. Now I have to press another frock for Wednesday to see how the next maneuver in this matter plays out. And poor Felineous. I went through an entire ball of yarn this morning, and he's going to be up with me into the wee hours (possibly as late as 9:00 p.m. even) helping me ball up another skein for Wednesday.
Not since he posed for that black velvet painting has the poor dear worked so hard.
Illuminati, where in Mertheldred's beard are you? That Hamou woman is posting claiming that she called her friends from the courtroom.
For starters, cell phones are not allowed in the courtroom. And for enders, she was under constant observation in the courtroom and just outside and was never on a phone.
So much for her pre-arranged posts about events in the courtroom.
O Mighty Shovel!
You were right! "Charlie" was a double agent! We had momentarily stopped just outside of Victorville so that she could pick up a fresh bag of Cheetos at the 7/11. I had laid back on my chase Vespa when suddenly "Charlie" darted out from the back of the Bronco and drove a screwdriver into both my tires! He was cackling like a maniac, and then he pulled off a latex face mask just like that guy in Mission:Impossible. It was Gomer! Gomer! He yelled "Guess we fixed your little red wagon, minion boy! Now L'il Bit can have her mocha de latte frappacino and cheese snacks in peace, you rascal!" Then he screamed "Go on, sis, I got your back!"
You might be wondering, Your Mightiness, what the police escort were doing during all of this. Well, they were just totally lost in admiration of her outfit. One of them was saying to the other one, "can you believe it? First that spectacular house and now a pantsuit like that? How does she do it?" So by the time they had all clambered back into the motorcade, she was tearing off the road.
Poor Ryan Seacrest was still glued to the hood of her car screaming "Oma! Oma! We can get you on the show tonight! Unlimited McFlurrys!"
I know, I'm a baaaaaad minion.
Luckily I had sent Minion Daryn to the courthouse ahead of me. I know you told me not to, and you were right about "Charlie", but Minion Daryn is the real deal. He seems like an awfully nice guy. Anyway, he waited outside and watched as she went into the courtroom, and she did too have sunglasses! Also, she didn't call anyone in the lobby on the way in or the way out, he was really sure of that. Of course he worried that she might spot him, so he tried to blend into the crowd. I guess he succeeded because when she came out she was talking to "Justin", only there was no one else there, and she was doing a different voice to answer herself! How weird is that? Then this old lady came out with knitting muttering something about a guillotine and not enough clothing in the world to keep up with Oma Hamou's court appearances.
Anyway, I am sorry. You're going to punish me, aren't you?
Your faithful minion
Tonight, Illuminati. Tonight.
I didn't see ANYTHING that "proved" Oma was in Court and "someone else" was posting. We do know that cellphones are stricly NOT ALLOWED in that Courtroom for any purpose. Strike one.
"IF" Oma had paid up, the DA would have dropped the charges. NOTHING is up to the Judge IF the DA drops charges. The fact "Alexandra McConnell" is still required to show up Wednesday morning, which was confirmed with the Court reporter, shows NOTHING has been dropped. Thus no money yet paid.
Strike Two.
"Alexandra McConnell" was late to court again. Walked in alone, spoke to her attorney, they went outside and she came back in and left ALONE. No friends. at no time on the cellphone. Strike Three.
Can't WAIT to see the minutes when they get put online tonight and really can't wait to hear the report about Wednesday's Prelim!!
Get used to it Team Hamou, NOBODY but NOBODY believes you guys are real, except for Oma and yourselves. I could have pulled of that lame posting thing all by myself with one person's help. Duh.
Well, I for one feel honored that Ms. Hamou/McConnell thought fit to dress more elegantly today, knowing she would have admirers and interested parties in the courtroom. I think it reflects what a real lady she can be when she sets her mind to it.
I think that she is perhaps coming to realize that a nicely-cut jacket is so much more appropriate for public places than a pair of hands over one's bare bosom and a tailored pair of slacks with a working zipper are more alluring than a fly that just won't stay closed.
Thank you, dear.
we faked your asses out but good! sis created the charlie guy the other day and he was really me. see we knew that the figmets were plotting to run away bu we had to have someone on the inside to chek them out so I was Charlie, right? THIUS IS SO COOL. So i pretended tyo be on the same side as that Daryn guy when we met with that strange little dude on the tiny motorbike and then I hid in the Bronco with Lil Bit and rode shotgun until I could disable his little motorbike and all just like a commando!!! Or a ninja!!!!!!
i dont know if sis is off the hook or not becauze she wont answer her damm cell phone and she left me at the 7/11. Big Mama had to drive down in the Gremlin toget me and you know she dont want to put no more mileage on that thing than what she has to so she was pretty pissed off. so anyway thats the stoiry and sis sure fooled you buttwipes with the old dodge where she has someone post stuff for her. wait i shouldna told you that. THAT NEVER HAPPENED.
Darlings! So exciting!
I would like to think for Omele's sake that the whole thing in court played out as she describes it (she is posting as "Handmaiden"), but there were a couple of things that struck me as off base. The whole cell phone business, where as usual she is splitting every hair in sight. Of course they don't confiscate them, darling, but you can bet your wide tuchis that they had better not catch you using them to text or anything else. And the idea that the judge lowered his voice to conceal what was happening from "stalkers" is just preposterous, darling. If anything, why didn't he notice "Justin" and his "wife" scanning the crowd? (Because they weren't there, of course, but that's another story, as my Auntie Zelda used to say . . .)
So while I certainly hope that you did have a cashier's check, darling, given your track record with bill payments . . . let's just say that it will be nice to see it in black and white, if you know what I mean, and I think you do.
Still posting, still caring, darling.
Mitzi
I love the handmaiden sockpuppet's "Logic". Just because I 'know' how to do something, I must be guilty of it.
Any four year old can open three different browsers at once, log in to the same website using different user names and appear to be three different people online the same time. I've run the AP forum for YEARS now and seen all sorts of these tricks. Just because I understand how to do it, doesn't mean I do it. My uncle taught me to shoot a rifle and pistol at age 12. I understand how to use firerms. That does not mean I'm going off on a shooting spree....
Let me see if I can stop laughing long enough to write this ...
Hamou went to court today, crowing that she paid the money for the civil settlement with a cashier's check. Now "Handmaiden" posts that Hamou has "authorized" her to disclose that Hamou accidentally made the check out to the wrong party.
Well, why not? She repeatedly pulls the wrong checkbook out of her purse when trying to pay for things. She tried to pay a couple of months ago but forgot to get the payment amount from the D.A. She tried to pay during her last court appearance, but the bank wouldn't release her funds to her. She accidentally sued herself recently in Texas. Today she has the check but had it made out to the wrong party.
Of course she made the check out incorrectly. Making it out correctly would have meant someone might actually try to cash it -- and we know where that would lead.
Looks like it's back to court, everyone. This one ain't over.
Heh, heh, heh.
har har har har har har har ha hahahahahaheheheheheheheheh.,..owww...hahahahahaha
"She made the check out to the DA instead of Mrs. Batchelor and had to go get a new one!"
hehehehehehahahahahahahaahahahahah
owwww my sides.....hahahhahahahaha
By the time she got back with a new check nobody was there !!!
hehehehehahahahahahahahahahahahahehehehehehe har har har har
Oh G-d, there is ALWAYS an excuse...hahahahahahahaheheheheheheh
Jeez this just gets funnier and funnier...this is even more hysterical than the ludicrous "bill of review" brief thing... hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
I want to go on record with a prediction....(wait I need to stop laughing...)
ok ok...tehee
ok..
I predict that on Wednesday at the Preliminary Hearing, the DA will REJECT the alleged check proffered by Alexandra McConnell/Oma Hamou and "force her" to go thru the prelim so it can be the DA's "fault" not hers....
hahahahteee heeeeeheeeehhee
hahaheheheheheahhahahehehehe
Oh this is too funny...At least she didn't grab the wrong checkbook or faint while waiting in the security screening line or get hit in the head with a foul baseball on the way into court...
"she made out the check wrong!"" HHAHAHAHAHAHAHEHEHEHEHAHAHAHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHAHAHAHAHAHARRRHAHRRRHAHHRRHAHAHAAAAAAA
beauty part is she thinks ANYONE other than her BELIEVES THIS????
hahahahahehehehehhahahahaharhharhahrharhhhahahaha
Oh, Oma.
You brought a check made out to the wrong person? Really? Really?
Wait a few minutes. How much longer before "Mike" or "Snoopy" describes this as a "blonde" moment? Marilyn Monroe channeling Jean Harlow couldn't be that blonde.
And I many move to California. The judicial system is so unbelievably courteous to defendants. Lowering their voices so that people in the courtroom can't hear the embarrassing revelations about the stupid things defendants do. What manners!
Sweetheart Handmaiden (who of course is Oma),
I would be a little less critical of Moshein's general competencies on the same day that Oma Hamou messes up paying a simple judgment yet again. Our legal people are in hysterics. No one saw this coming. We all thought she would slide off to the hospital or something. And remember, it was Rob who tabbed that she hadn't succeeded in paying it off today while all of you figments were trying to convince us that she had.
Rebecca
I used to sign it "There is only one Rebecca!" because Oma used the same tag, but I am now willing to concede it to her. There is only one Oma. And she is an idiot.
Let me get this straight.
Hamou, who insists that what goes on with the Batchelor case is a private matter that no one else has any business knowing, is going to post a copy of the mis-written cashier's check on the internet?
Of course, we're talking about a woman here who professes to live in mortal dread of being raped but who posts semi-nude and nude pictures of herself on her blog, including soft-core porn shots of her with her zipper undone down to her sugar patch.
Ain't no explaining true crazy.
Oma, posting as "Handmaiden" wrote
"As for making the check out to the wrong person, she knew she needed the check and it had to go to the D.A., so it is not surprising that she made it out to that office. If it wasn't made completely clear that they would only be holding the check until Mrs. Batchelor picked it up, then I can see how a person would have thought it was supposed to be made out to the D.A. Personally, I would have clarified it before getting the check, but then I do tend to be a stickler for details."
Seriously, girlfriend, if this is what actually happened --- and of course it isn't, but for the sake of argument let's all play one more game of "Let's Pretend With Oma Hamou" --- you should at best fire Brian Watson and at worst have him disbarred.
RJ --- there is only one, and she is much smarter than you.
Now she is posting as "Snoopy" that she was in court (as "Snoopy", i.e. "Justin" --- Justin, were you there?) snapping pictures of the people in the courtroom with her cell phone!
California is one lenient state, people!
RJ
Let us not forget that we were assured over and over and over that AS A MATTER OF FACT that Oma/Alexandra was going to meet "DAYS IN ADVANCE" their exact words, with the DA to hand over the check. Oma wanted to move heaven and earth to resolve this before the New year... BUT gee, that didn't happen EITHER did it? Nope....
"Snoopy" took PICTURES of people going into a public court.
First, who's the STALKER??
Second, NO CAMERAS ARE PERMITTED IN THE COURT HOUSE. ANYONE TAKING PICTURES IN THAT COURTHOUSE HAS COMMITTED A CRIME.
Thanks for admitting you committed a crime.
I had forgotten about that, Rob (let's face it, a lot happens on these forums!). How odd that the D.A. didn't explain to her how to write the check during the discussions about when she was going to deliver it. How . . . odd.
Rebecca
I assume that the cell phone will be delivered to the police with the notation that one of the pictures is their quarry? I'll bet they get right on it . . .after they arrest the person who gives them the cell phone.
You cannot make this nonsense up. And yet, she does. Every day.
RJ
Can you say "BUSTED"????
First "handmaiden" says:
just got word that, yes she has to go back to get the charges officially dropped, but they accepted the money, so everything should go pretty smoothly after this. and:
since they do not take your cell phone from you before going into the courtroom, it is quite obvious that they are allowed. Now, talking on them is indeed frowned upon while court is in session, but that does not ban things like text messages.
THEN she says: "witnesses have already stated that she wasn't texting, calling, or anything else."
AND
The check was NOT accepted...clearly by 'team hamou's" own admission.
Really, like Judge Judy says "If you tell the truth you don't have to have a good memory to remember the stuff you lied about..."
Dear everyone,
For the record, I was NOT in court today. Neither was my wife.
Justin
This just keeps getting better. They can't keep track of their lies
hahahahahahahhahhhahahahahahaha
First
Oma did go over to the bank to the bank to get the replacement check in the correct name, and then took it to the D.A.'s office, but since there is no court this afternoon they will not be able to finalize everything until on Wednesday.
then
in fact she has delivered the correct check to her attorney this afternoon, and he gave it to the D.A. Therefore, she did pay today
So, which is it??
hahahahahrhahahrharhahrahrharhar har har ahr hehehehehahahahahehehehe
I delivered a check in court today and am going back on Wednesday for the dismissal.
I tried to deliver the check, but it was made out wrong.
I took the properly-made-out check to the DA's office this afternoon, but they weren't in so I'll take it Wednesday.
My lawyer took it to the DA this afternoon (they were in, after all), and everything's all settled.
Justin Edwards was taking pictures of people in the courtroom.
Justin Edward was not taking pictures of people in the courtroom.
Oma called her friends from the courtroom.
Oma didn't call her friends from the courtroom.
All this in under 8 hours of posting. This must be approaching a record for stumbling over one's own lies. A primo comedy matinee delivered to us by the Woman Who Manages to Sue Herself.
God, I hope she doesn't end up in jail. Where could we go for a steady stream of entertainment this good?
As Rebecca is always saying, you simply cannot make this shit up.
"of COURSE" now they (meaning Oma of course) decided that "why" bother posting the check and thus proving she had a check. Isn't that ever so "convenient"....duh there WAS no check.
and on Wednesday there will be more excuses, more tales and more blame everywhere but of course NO BLAME on OmaAlexandra....
"Oma paid for a FACT, she told me. People in Court saw her pay and told us she did."
Then "Oma didn't pay. She WANTED to but she made the check out wrong."
"Oma TRIED to pay but nobody was in Court when she had the right check."
"Oma gave the right check to her lawyer and HE paid..."
the never ending story...never ending...ever. Never.
Ask yourself this:
How many "straight men with wives" write like this, that you know?"
You are nothing but a bitch! Your just a fucking bitch You are a genuine bitch. So if you turn out to be Bob then your a flaming HAG!
I don't know any either...Poor psychotic grey haired but dyed Oma having to rant like a lunatic...
Illuminati! You malfeasant, mewling moron!
They spotted you in court yesterday spotting them. Can I not entrust any task to you?
I know human clothe ... er, business suits don't fit you very well, but you shouldn't have been that easy to spot. There are some very tall midgets. Did you carry that briefcase with the transmitt ... er, the business papers I gave you? And you had better tell me you used that scalp glue for the toupee this time.
We'll be talking later. Dingbat.
Your Lord and Master,
The Grand Shovel
Good MORNING! here is what the minutes from yesterday say:
PARTIES ANNOUNCE READY FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING.
PRELIMINARY HEARING CONFIRMED.
The DA and Watson agreed before hand to be ready for tomorrow, so they actually didn't need to announce ready in court since the Judge was already informed.
See you in court tomorrow morning Oma. The Preliminary Hearing tomorrow is ON CALENDAR AS CONFIRMED!
oh this just gets BETTER!
Found this on the San Bernardino court record site:
Case FVI802540 Defendant 3045972 MCCONNELL, ALEXANDRA OMA
Action: RESTITUTION HEARING Date: 01/07/2010 Time: 8:00 AM
Division: V6 Hearing Status: DISPOSED
LARRY W ALLEN
CLERK: LF-LORI FLORES
DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY CAMERON PAGE NOT PRESENT.
ATTORNEY BRIAN WATSON-RETAINED PRESENT.
DEFENDANT NOT PRESENT.
-
PROCEEDINGS
ACTION CAME ON FOR PRE DISPOSITION HEARING
-
NO ACTION TAKEN.
-
HEARINGS
EXISTING DATES CONFIRMED.
-
CUSTODY STATUS
CURRENT BAIL BOND CONTINUED.
CASE CUSTODY - BAIL BOND
============= MINUTE ORDER END ================
In other words, there was SUPPOSED to be a Restitution Hearing, Brian Watson showed up. NOTHING HAPPENED, NO RESTITUTION PAID, so it went to Preliminary Hearing for tomorrow!
Lets see 'team hamou' pretend the Court minutes are somehow 'wrong'...hehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehe
Oh and WAIT!
That "cashiers check" "snoopy" posted is dated Janaury 11! YESTERDAY was the 11th....Therefore that check "accidentally made out wrong" could NOT have been brought to court yesterday MORNING because Chase Bank (my bank actually) is not OPEN at 8:30am....
Black's Law dictionary:
Restitution:
Reimbursements ordered by courts as part of a criminal sentence
Sounds as if Alexandra McConnell might be accepting a plea bargain. Wonder what the lesser charge is to which she must plead GUILTY?
I don't have to make stuff up. Go read the San Bernardino Superior Court records for yourself. Search "action" under Alexandra McConnell's open criminal file. You'll see a "Restitution Hearing" with the minutes (which I posted) large as life on january 7....
My dears, I have learned so much from you here, including how to googly things on the internet for myself.
Poor, poor Mrs. Batchelor, having to wait so long for Ms. Hamou/McConnell to produce a check, and then having it made out all wrong.
I am pleased to report, however, that I did succeed in finding out a few things about restitution on the googly thing.
Luckily for Mrs. Batchelor, Ms. Hamou/McConnell stiffed her in California, where restitution is hard to duck:
"Where victims have a clear statutory right to restitution, the right has been found to apply to cases that result in a plea agreement. The California Court of Appeals recently ruled that restitution must be a part of every sentence, regardless of a plea agreement to the contrary: 'The Legislature left no discretion or authority with the trial court or the prosecution to bargain away the victim’s constitutional and statutory right to restitution. As such, it cannot properly be the subject of plea negotiations.'”
I do hope we'll get more detail tomorrow in the preliminary hearing, including why the restitution matter was not resolved amicably yesterday, as Ms. Hamou/McConnell promised us all.
Ok guys. Place your wagers!
Alexandra/Oma must accept a guilty plea bargain to some lesser crime: even money
Alexandra/Oma goes forward with the Prelim and goes on to trial. The paying of restitution is a way to mitigate sentencing. : 2-1
Alexandra/Oma walks away "scot free" like "team hamou' insists: 2,000-1
Alexandra/Oma gets "sick" and goes to hospital: 7-1
Alexandra/Oma's check turns out not good: 2-1
Place your bets. The betting pool closes at 8AM PST or 11am EST.
"Handmaiden" posted:
"Now, as for whether the there are any errors, by the posts on Rob's own blog we know there are errors in these minutes. Rob's cronies - the ones helping him stalk her - admitted that she was present, yet by what Rob posted here for the minutes she wasn't there."
Nice try, but no cigar, Hamoo. What was observed was that your lawyer conferred at the bench with the judge without you at the bench with him. Therefore, the court reporter, who only reports proceedings before the judge, would have recorded you as not present for the proceedings. The court reporter does not record the presence of people sitting out in the audience -- or, in your case, standing, as there were no seats left when you arrived.
Sleep well and don't let the beg bugs bite. Tomorrow's a big day now that all that check confusion is sorted out, eh?
A Hamilton that she cops a plea.
(I watch Law and Order. Can you tell?)
RJ
Uh-oh. Mr. Watson, if you are reading this, she is impugning your ability on her forum. You "forgot" to tell her about a hearing?
Roll over, Perry Mason.
Rebecca
RJ I'll wager another bottle of Mumm's Cramant she cops a plea...
Yeah, Quite astute as always RJ.
Brian Watson has been defamed in a major way by "team hamou"...
He fails to advise his client as to exactly how MUCH she owes in restitution.
He fails to advise his client exactly WHEN she must pay up.
He fails to advise his client as to how the check should be made
He fails to simply accept the money from his client and pay out of his Client Trust fund.
He fails to advise his client, in a timely fashion, about a required Restitution hearing.
I'm not making this up. This is verbatim from "team hamou"...She sure has made some serious accusations about her attorney, Brian Watson of Victorville California...
Oh, and girlfriend? It is not going to happen. There has been no stalking, there has been no attempt to cause harm; you brought this on yourself, and Mrs. Batchelor never read any of this nonsense. She was simply annoyed with you for failing to pay your damned rent. Deal. People have spoken with the Batchelor family.
Put on your big-girl underoos and take care of your mess.
If this internet flame war was in any way a matter of concern, the legal authorities would have been in touch with Moshein. He makes no attempt to hide his identity, they know where he is. Rob, has anyone contacted you from the police? The San Bernadino District Attorney?
RJ
RJ
Nope,
I have not been contacted by law enforcement for any reason, from anywhere ever.
I have had one speeding ticket, 72 in a 65 zone about 7 years ago.
I called law enforcement in July when a 17 year old girl passed out drunk after a Sunday afternoon Frat party in my front yard.
No FBI, no law enforcement. nada nobody zip zilch. Despite the threats for the last six years. NOTHING.
That's pretty much what I thought.
Oma, if you are reading this, and of course you are, pay the woman, plead guilty to a lesser crime, and get on with it.
to be clear
The girl passed out in my front yard after a Frat party ELSEWHERE. The frat party was NOT in my yard. and it was 107 degrees when she passed out.
Yep RJ
You are as always right. 'team hamou' sounds so very desperate, freaked, and well, stressed. Which agrees with the observer's report about her.
Can not until we hear tomorrow about the Prelim. and more....
What in the wide world of sports are you talking about, Oma? For years you have been saying that police and district attorneys are about to take action, that you have filed, that you have consulted, that you have done it all, girlfriend, and now you wuss out with the news that until you actually file (hello?), the police will do nothing? Girlfriend, if you have reported being stalked --- and you claim you have, hence the conspiratorial silence at the last hearing --- then why haven't they contacted Rob Moshein?
Seriously, do you actually believe all of the crap you ladle out, or is it simply reflexive at this point?
Oh, well. What are you wearing to court tomorrow? I'll be in Donna Karan, deep purple. Wave!
Rebecca
One more time: PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN WITH THE BATCHELOR FAMILY. THEY DO NOT CONFIRM YOUR VERSION OF THESE EVENTS. THERE ARE NO OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS THAT DO.
Pay your debts, woman!
OK
A new admission by 'team hamou' that despite the threats, insisting diatribe and verbal masturbation by them for years...
Oma/Alexandra has not yet even FILED CHARGES...no WONDER, even though they insist she HAS FILED CHARGES and "law enforcement" is investigating, that was all lie...
Once again you are proving that all you characters want to do is lie and try and bully Oma into not filing charges. Until such time as she files the charges, they will not act. Anyone who has even a small clue knows that is how the law works. If a crime is not reported, it is not acted upon.
SO Oma Hamou Alexandra McConnell has not yet "reported a crime"... and "not yet filed charges:
SO all the claims that she HAS are LIES...thanks "team hamou" for admitting you LIE
bwaHHHHAHHHHHAHHHABWAHHHAHAHHHAHHH
"oma hamou is coming after me with a vengeance..." hhahahahahehehehehehehahahahaheheheehehehhhohohohohhohhehehhhhihhihihihh
right. 'snoopy' has said this same crap for six plus years. NOTHING HAPPENS EVER. EVER EVER.... why shoul anyone believe his mental masturbation is any different from the SAME verbatims statements from the last six years? Shall I post these threats? Glad to do it again, since Ive done it already...
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzboring.
thanks 'sandman' for living up to your name.. thirty thousand words, repeated for the eight hundredth time. BORED ME TO DEATH....put me to sleep...such bullshit..boring crap, meaningless drivel. Bored me to tears.
Oh, and NOBODY GIVES A CRAP except Oma Hamou and her alter ego psychos....
Looking forward to reports from the Prelim tomorrow.
O Mighty Shovel!
I am in place, tweeting this from . . . well, let's just say that I am in place. Minion Daryn and I are dressed as ninjas. Of course, we made kind of an odd pair, since he is 6'5 and I am barely four feet tall, so we are pretending to be a father and son ninja combination. I know! Genius, right? Anyway, I have a tightly wound black head dress so no one can see my tou --- err, hair. Anyway, once that old biddy arrives with her knitting, Minion Daryn is going to distract her with nunchuks, and then I am going to replace her capacious knitting bag with an identical carry-all containing . . . me! The bag I will be in has a false bottom, and she will carry me into the courtroom. I have drilled a small hole through one of the embroidered flowers on the side, and thus will be able to keep an eye on the proceedings. I might even be able to take pictures with my cell phone!
Uh-oh. Handmaiden just started her car. We're a little cramped back here (for some reason the trunk is filled with cat litter bags and empty McFlurry containers, but at least it cushions us and --- OWWW).
More later!
Illuminati the Ninja
Uh, moron. You should not have posted your plan until after it has been executed.
Sighhhh .....
Your Lord and Master,
The Grand Shovel
Hope Oma/Alexandra left a little early today. The Preliminary Hearing is on calendar for 9:00AM SHARP!
tick tick tick tick tick
Oh good. The alternate personalities are clearly logging in via an iPhone and posting about "getting calls from Court that Oma/Alexandra has ARRIVED!" Lord the typos show exactly its via an iphone or blackberry...
hehehehehehehehehehehahahahahah
We already KNEW she was there.
O Mighty Grand Shovel,
First of all, it wasn't my fault. Handmaiden's car hit a bump, the trunk popped open and Minion Daryn and I rolled out onto the highway. It was still a little dark out, and we were in those ninja outfits, so people couldn't exactly see us, and I really don't know where Daryn wound up. I think he managed to catch hold of the rear bumper on a Hummer and skitch off into the night. He texted me later that he would meet me back at the spacesh---headquarters. So I climbed out of the ninja outfit and put on my Minion robes in my knapsack. You know, the hot pink ones you gave me for my birthday last year? I wanted to look nice when I tried to hitchike into Victorville and all, so I put on the complete outfit, flowing head scarf and everything. It was the most amazing thing, O Mighty One. When I stood on the side of the road and stuck my thumb out, three eighteen wheelers just slammed on the brakes. I got into the second one because the driver, Ed Earle, had the nicest smile. He was all like "hop on in, little feller, and tell me all about yourself!" Which I thought was nice, but now I'm not so sure.
For one thing, he missed the Victorville turnoff, and when I pointed this out, he said not to worry about it, he knew a shortcut to the courtroom. Then he started popping CDs into the stereo on the dashboard and we listened to a lot of Tim McGraw, Garth Brooks and Elaine Stritch stuff and he just kept looking over at me and smiling. Then he started to talk about how it can get lonely on the road, and everybody has needs, and things like that.
Then he asked me what I usually wore under the robes (I think he thinks I'm what the huma--- err, people --- call a Muslim). A Muslim woman, I think, with a fabulous sense of fashion, but I get the feeling that eh won't mind if I turn out to be a Muslim man because as he says, it gets very lonely on the road, and sometimes you have a taste for falafel and sometimes you have a taste for couscous. What does that mean, O Exalted One?
I am sending this by iPhone so you will know I am alright, and why I have not reached Victorville as yet.
Your devoted and increasingly uncomfortable with Joe Ealre,
Illuminati
What does that mean, you innocent fool?
It means you GET OUT OF THAT TRUCK NOW! We cannot have any earthli ... er, people nosing around with reproductive methods they do not understand.
And don't you DARE offer to show Earle what you like to ... er, you know.
Your Lord and Master,
And I mean it,
The Grand Master
and "conveniently" the alter ego posts again, only THIS time during the Court's lunch recess...yeah, its not someone else. RIGHT.
Well, well. At long last, Mrs. Batchelor gets her money. It only took a felony arrest, Hamou sitting in jail for several weeks trying to post bond, a slew of court appearances and repeated defense requests for continuances while Hamou scrambled to come up with the money, and loads of legal fees.
Wow. Wouldn't it have been easier just to have written a good check to start with?
Of course, that's the M.O. of a grifter. Write a bad check. Hope they don't find you. If they do find you, make every excuse in the book. And only pay up if you absolutely have to in order to avoid jail.
It took Wild West Productions going to the police in Irvine to get Hamou to pay them. It took Don Morton's family going to the Elder Abuse Unit of the L.A. Police to get Hamou to pull her claws out of Morton's bank account. She's still got an outstanding warrant against her in L.A. County. And she's got a string of oustanding civil judgments against her from people who could not find her or any assets to collect. That's what a grifter does. Work the odds and work the system.
By the way, tell your sidekick (Handmaiden, is it?) that I could introduce her to a very helpful lady: Jenny Craig. She's well beyond the help of black-on-black.
Congrats, Mrs. Batchelor. Never had so much trouble collecting a rent check, though, huh?
So she escaped again at the very last possible moment. Ah well.
So, maybe "handmaiden" is real? She is the really really really fat 50 year old with the long stringy scraggly hair??
Jenny Craig can't help. That one needs the lap band.
Thanks 'snoopy' for at least ADMITTING that Oma Hamou, using the alias name Alexandra McConnell issued a BUM CHECK your exact words to Mrs. Batchelor...
Got stopped by the police on the way home?
Good grief, Hamou. Can't you even make it back to the lair without a scrape with the cops?
And the warrant in L.A. County is for Oma Hamou, not for Alexandra McConnell. Not a big mystery why the cops don't find a match on a simple traffic stop. And no big mystery why you keep changing your name. And social security number. And address.
As for who observed you in court -- we really thought you'd figure it out today by seeing the person again today who was in court on Monday. Instead you glommed onto some poor old man? Oh, well, maybe you managed to hit him up for some money or his social security number to help you dig yourself out from under the restitution, the bail money, and the legal fees for that "bum check" you "accidentally" wrote Mrs. Batchelor. Might as well get some work done while in court, eh?
O Mighty Shovel!
Sorry it has taken me so long to report in, but I had to leave my time/space communicato --- err, my iPhone in Ed Earle's truck when I leaped out in front of the San Bernadino courthouse. It was a little embarrassing, and I don't really want to get into it, but I had to leave my minion robes behind as well. Ed Earle's parting handshake got a little too enthusiastic, but that's another story.
So there I was wearing only an undergarment made of black cat pelts garnered during the massacre we instigated. So I had to find cover pretty quickly because the streets were starting to fill with a motorcade! It was the damndest thing, first there was a car labeled "San Bernadino District Attorney" and he was sitting on the back jump seat waving to the crowd, and he was followed by a few police cars with their lights twirling and they were followed by a kind of heavyset woman with stringy hair driving a car that I recognized as Handmaiden's, and she was followed by Ms. H in her Mercedes and then several more police cars with flashing lights. And when nobody was looking I grabbed onto the last cop's passenger door and swung myself up onto his roof without a sound. Like a ninja, even though I wasn't in black anymore, just the bon-bon boxers. You remember the ones I got from my Secret Santa at the Minion Christmas Party in 2008 that you liked so much? Those ones?
Anyway, the motorcade moved out toward Victorville and what do you think happened next? We pulled into the McDonald's from the other day, only this time all of the police went in and they came out with complimentary McFlurrys for Ms. H. and the other large woman. Maybe three for each!
And then the District Attorney's car and the rest of the motorcade peeled off, and then she started for home. I had gotten off the roof of the cop car and was hiding in the bushes and guess what? Another police car pulled her over as soon as she left the McDonald's parking lot! She is really popular with law enforcement! I mean, really popular.
So she drove on, and I had to hitch hike back to secret headquarters, and it took a loooong time because I was only wearing the boxers, which you would think should have made me popular, but didn't. But I made it eventually, and and Minion Daryn and I are now splitting a cup of Ovaltine.
So did anything interesting happen today?
Illuminati the Exhausted
I'm not sure I would use the word "vindicated" in regard to Oma's fourteen month waltz with the legal system. In order to get her to pay up, and by the way, girlfriend, congratulations upon finally settling a debt, she had to be arrested, go to jail, make several court appearances and engage in every delaying tactic she could muster; she blamed everyone but herself for what happened, and I seriously doubt that the whole thing ended with either the District Attorney or Mrs. Batchelor accepting her cashier's check (you know, because they now trust her so much) with moist eyes and a glad smile, amid protestations that they were just silly-billies for taking legal action against her. I assume Mrs. Batchelor was satisfied because she got her money (and given Ooma Hamou's track record she should be crowing. I have no doubt that Oma's other creditors look at Mrs Batchelor with envious eyes!) and the District Attorney made it clear that she wasn't going to be allowed to ignore her obligations.
Vindication? You aren't Alfred Dreyfus, Oma. I congratulate you for not going to jail, because no one should go to jail --- and you would know better than I because you have been in jail several times --- but this incident will only truly have worked if it scares the shit out of you enough so that you don't pull something like this on someone again.
I'm not a betting woman, but . . .
Rebecca
according to the Court reporter's minutes published on the San Bernardino Court records website:
"THE VICTIM RECEIVED FULL RESTITUTION".
NOTE THE TWO SPECIFIC WORDS USED: VICTIM AND RESTITUTION.
As usual, Ms. Hamou is trying to spin a web of confusion around her affairs.
The court minutes note that the case was dismissed because "THE VICTIM HAS RECEIVED FULL RESTITUTION."
Note the word "victim".
But here's the more interesting note. The minutes say the case was "DISMISSED PURSUANT TO 1385 PC."
And here's the relevant part of California Penal Code Section 1385:
"(a) ... No dismissal shall be made for any cause which would be ground of demurrer to the accusatory pleading."
What this sentence means is that a case is not eligible for dismissal under this clause if the case against the accused had no merit. In other words, the judge found that the DA had a strong case but dismissed it because the defendant agreed to make restitution to the victim. It was the need to determine the DA's case was solid that required a preliminary hearing before the dismissal could be accepted under this clause.
Given the fact that California jails are spilling over and the D.A. wanted to be sure Mrs. Batchelor got her money, he simply agreed to settle this case to accommodate those needs. It had nothing to do with the merits of his case.
Vindicated? Hardly.
I have posted a new updated blog. Please take your new comments over there.
Post a Comment