As law enforcement seems unable to assist me, and the person behind this campaign to defame me and interfere with my business and profession, named variously Oma Hamou, Oma Mcconnell or Alexandra McConnell is what they call "judgment proof" meaning she has no money, I must place this blog here.
I would NOT even have written here, had this person not continually written her own false and defamatory statements herself and aided and abetted other personae writing "on her behalf" for the last three years. If she doesn't want me to say anything about her, she ought not have been continually blogging and writing about me much less aiding and encouraging others to do so as well.
The woman behind all of this goes by many names: Oma Hamou, Oma McConnell, Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Hamou, Oma Demian, Alexandra Murphy, are the usual ones, but there are others. The reason this woman and her "alleged" friends crusade to destroy me is simple. I learned about her genuine background, and she wants me silenced from speaking about it.
This woman, Oma Hamou, Oma McConnell, Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Hamou, Oma Demian, Alexandra Murphy and her other aliases have a twenty year track record of FELONY CONVICTIONS, multiple arrests, failure to abide by the requirements of her probation for her felony convictions which lead to more arrests, many many civil judgments against her for hundreds of thousands of dollars, a history of writing bad checks, and currently she was arrested late in 2008 in San Bernardino California on a Felony Charge of Forgery of a Financial Instrument (she seems to have forged a large check) After 14 months of dragging the process out, she paid the Victim full restitution and the District Attorney dropped the Felony charge.
Someone else has recently posted a precis of the criminal and debt history of this woman. You can go here to read the specific details for yourself:
http://www.omahamoureality.blogspot.com
While Oma Hamou aka Alexandra McConnell claims to be a "Motion Picture Executive" her online anonymous "friends" admit she works as a Paralegal in the Palmdale area. She may well be associated with a Paralegal firm called "Advanced Paralegal Services". This leads to the obvious question of whether those for whom this woman provides paralegal services KNOW the woman handling their private legal papers is a convicted FELON, with three convictions for crimes of Moral Turpitude and recently spent FIFTEEN MONTHS facing charges for Felony Forgery for writing a bad check. Does she disclose this important information to people who hire her as a paralegal so that they may make an informed decision?
She is nearly psychotic in her daily compulsion because I stumbled onto the actual facts of her past, and present, which do not coincide with the personae she wants to project to others.
This woman, Oma Hamou, Oma McConnell, Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Hamou, Oma Demian, Alexandra Murphy et al, has for YEARS now, threatened me with civil and criminal actions. For years now, NOTHING has happened except more ongoing threats online. NOW HER OWN WEBSITE TODAY FEBRUARY 28, 2010 CONFIRMS AND ADMITS SHE AND HER "FRIENDS" DELIBERATELY LIED EVERY SINGLE TIME THEY SAID OMA HAMOU HAD FILED A CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST ME AND THEY WERE LYING EVERY SINGLE TIME THEY SAID I WAS UNDER POLICE INVESTIGATION, SINCE THE POLICE WILL INVESTIGATE NOTHING UNLESS A FORMAL COMPLAINT IS FILED. HER ONLINE ALLEGED 'FRIENDS' NOW CLAIM THEY HAVE LIED FOR YEARS ABOUT THEIR IDENTITIES.
I am called a "criminal stalker". First, being called a criminal is Libel per se in Texas, since I have never been convicted of ANYTHING worse than one speeding ticket. As for a stalker, well, I have no clue where this woman is, where she lives, and frankly I don't WANT to know, nor can I care less. In the words of one of her attorney's, Dave. S. "the faster that woman is in my rearview mirror the happier I'll be" (yeah I have the email he said that to me in.). I WISH NO CONTACT WITH OR FROM THIS PERSON.
I do NOT wish this person ill, or harm. Frankly, I do not care about her. The less I hear about her, the better. That said, no one should ever be subjected to harm or danger. I DO NOT WISH THIS PERSON HARM, nor have I advocated, wished, nor advised anyone to harm her. Such allegations are baseless, wrong and defamatory. I just want he to leave me and my partner ALONE and stop the thousands of pages of defamatory lies she puts up and allows "friends" to post on her website in order to cause me harm.
This woman, Oma Hamou, Oma McConnell, Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Hamou, Oma Demian, Alexandra Murphy has demonstrated she has no credibility. You can read below in previous posts where she has outright lied, most notably when she filed a report about her business with Dunn and Bradstreet that was investigated by them and shown to be completely fraudulent.
Ask yourself if the following make any, rational or reasonable common sense:
This woman claims to be an actress and model, but for a decade steadfastly REFUSES to provide one single shred of evidence to support the allegation, not even a credit, reference or magazine issue. She says only "I was and I don't have to prove it. YOU have to prove I wasn't". Does that make sense?
This woman claims that her three felony convictions were not Her fault, but rather someone else's fault. Does THAT make sense?
This woman claims that her recent Felony Forgery Charges in San Bernardino are "just a big mistake" and "law enforcement and the DA" are on "her side" and "believe her", yet they STILL pressed charges and scheduling dozens of hearings over FOURTEEN MONTHS. Does THAT make sense??
This woman has claimed for six years non stop that I am being investigated by law enforcement and the FBI. Yet, NOTHING ever happened, I have never been contacted by law enforcement for any reason in those six years other than one speeding ticket. Does it make any sense to you that law enforcement is doing ANYTHING for six years now?
UPDATE FEBRUARY 28TH: THIS WOMAN'S WEBSITE NOW ADMITS THAT OMA HAMOU HAS NEVER ACTUALLY FILED A CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST ME. EVERY SINGLE TIME SHE OR HER ALLEGED FRIENDS HAVE MADE THAT STATEMENT WAS A BALD FACED DELIBERATE LIE INTENDED SOLELY TO DEFAME ME. ASSESS ANY CREDIBILITY SHE AND HER CRONIES HAVE ACCORDINGLY. THEY CONFIRM AND ADMIT TO DELIBERATELY LYING THAT CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS WERE FILED, WHICH MEANS EACH TIME THEY CLAIMED I WAS UNDER CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION WAS ALSO A DELIBERATE AND INTENTIONAL LIE. HOW CAN ANYTHING THEY WRITE BE TRUSTED IF THEY ADMIT TO DELIBERATELY LYING ABOUT SUCH MATTERS?
Buddha said Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense.
Look at all the blathering posts she has put up on the internet, and ask yourself, do these things agree with YOUR reason and your own common sense? The answer is obvious.
As you can see, this woman and/or her cronies now LIE, falsify documents and use years old private letters to attempt to defame and disparage me, and Bob Atchison
Many people whom have come into contact with her call her a con artist and scam artist. She hangs out with convicted felons, even inviting these career criminals to live in her house with her.
You can verify all the arrests, judgments etc for yourself with simple online searches.
You are free to email me with your questions, and if you yourself have been a VICTIM of this woman Oma Hamou, Oma McConnell, Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Hamou, Oma Demian, Alexandra Murphy, I encourage you to contact me.
438 comments:
1 – 200 of 438 Newer› Newest»New Blog. Please start new comments here.
Oh gosh, do I have to??
Okay. I guess I will.
I used to drink Caymus wine, btw,Mr. Moshein.
For someone who thinks my wine expertise is "minimal and worthless" in your opinion, I find it odd you clearly follow my wine Blog regularly.
Actually I don't. I don't think I have been on your site for. . . .hmmmm. . about 6 months now?? I think longer, actually. Your rant about Caymus was passed along to me.
Shame about the winery. I enjoyed it. I believe I had Caymus at my 1st wedding at the Columbia Gorge Hotel. Which is no more. (Course that was 23 years ago, my how time flies!) I just remember we had dinner and wine for 14 of us and the wine bill was larger than the dinner bill. Good times. . . .too bad I married the wrong guy.
Remember how we were wondering why Oma Hamou's bail was initially set at $1 million when she was arrested for forgery in late 2008? Well, I found something interesting while cruising some California court sites.
California has a "Felony Bail Schedule" that sets the bail a person who is arrested without a warrant is to be put under until he or she has a hearing before a judge, where bail may then be set at a different amount.
This schedule contains pages and pages of specific bail amounts for all sorts of crimes. The bail for forgery is $20,000.
The only situation where a $1 million bail is to be imposed is when the offense would result in life imprisonment. And what offenses in California result in life imprisonment? Well, one of them is violating the "three strikes" law.
Did the fingerprint check upon "Alexandra McConnell's" arrest connect her to the other convictions she has had in California under different names?
Is that why Hamou / McConnell was so desperate to avoid a conviction in her recent forgery case? Is that why she struggled for 14 months to come up with the restitution money for Mrs. Batchelor, trying the judge's patience with requests for continuation after continuation?
Just wondering.
Well Blake, lets look at this logically. California has a VERY strict "Three strikes" rule. Oma Hamou has three felony convictions, therefore, another conviction would trigger the 3 strike rule and she would face MANDATORY life in prison...
Now the constant delays make total sense instead of just going to trial if she had the "smoking gun" of proving her innocence...
Isn't is ever so "coincidental" that some in Palmdale CA no only reads this blog every single day, but also reads my Wine Guy blogs every single day! They must be very very interested in what I have to say.
Well, well, well. We seem to have hit Madame H's alarm button.
This certainly opens up an interesting line of reasoning.
Let's rehearse what we know about this situation:
1) Alexandra McConnell (aka Oma Hamou, inter alia) was arrested on a charge of felony forgery.
2) Her bail was initially set at $1,000,000.
3) Magistrates in California do not have unfettered discretion to set bail at whatever they would like. They have to abide by a state-issued schedule.
4) That state-issued schedule sets bail for felony forgery at $20,000.
5) The only offense on that schedule that allows bail to be set upon jail intake at $1,000,000 is an offense that could result in life imprisonment.
6) Unless Hamou was also initially charged with some even more heinous offense than felony forgery, the only possible reason she was at risk of life imprisonment from this arrest would be if her conviction would trigger the "three strikes" law.
Taking all this into account, I think it's quite clear what was going on.
Regards,
Hedley Artmam III, Esq.
I had wondered about the initial bail as well, since it seemed out of proportion to the offense. However, I also get that no one wants to add a low-level grifter as a permanent resident of an over-crowded penal system in California, so it makes sense that they were willing to get the payment through other avenues.
Facinating work, Blake. Oh, and Oma? Perhaps when you write to Ms. Stewart with your absurd list of Rob's "crimes", you could menion your own stretches in the clink. Perhaps Ms. Stewart will sympathize and drop you a check.
Rebecca
Hedley is quite accurate and correct. California requires by law that all bail in the State follow a uniform schedule. ALL felony crimes in the State of California are listed in the schedule and all judges MUST by law follow the schedule when setting bail.
The Penal Code violation that Alexandra McConnell was charged under carries the presumptive schedule amount of $20,000. HOWEVER, under the schedule, aggravating circumstances can and will change the bail amount.
The ONLY crimes for which ANY JUDGE IN CALIFORNIA MAY SET BAIL AT ONE MILLION DOLLARS ARE THOSE CARRYING LIFE SENTENCE.
The ONLY POSSIBLE way a Judge could issue Alexandra McConnell's bail was because she had been previously convicted of three Felony crimes and would be subject to the mandatory California Three Strikes rule which would require her to serve life in prison if found guilty.
Judges can NOT under the law "arbitrarily" set bail. The accusation from the moron snoopy that "nobody not even the DA knows why bail was set at One Million Dollars" flies completely in the face of the California Uniform Bail Schedule which all Judges MUST FOLLOW. If some rogue judge disregarded this law as they claim, that Judge would be subject to punishment and probably lose his seat on the bench.
Just google "california Uniform Bail Schedule" and you will see this is the truth.
Acme has a copy of that schedule, you know.
Oh, Tina, dear! Congratulations on your pending nuptials. How very exciting.
As I assume white is out of the question, my pet, what color will you be wearing?
If I can help with advice of any kind, you have only to ask, my sweet. I'm just full of it.
Love and best wishes,
Penelope A.
Tell me Mr. Moshein that Mr. Atchison doesn't channel Alexandra Feoderovna. Please tell me that. The woman was a whack job to put it mildly.
Bob does not "channel" anyone. Never has. More fiction from "team hamou".
and typically Morbidly Obese debbie misses the point entirely.
Bail doesn't just "miraculously" get set. A JUDGE sets bail when the person is arrested.
CA Penal Code 1269b:
(a)the clerk of the superior court of the county in which the offense was alleged to have been committed, and the clerk of the superior court in which the case against the defendant is pending may approve and accept bail in the amount fixed by the warrant of arrest, schedule of bail, or order admitting to bail in cash or surety bond executed by a certified, admitted surety insurer as provided in the Insurance Code, to issue and sign an order for the release of the arrested person, and to set a time and place for the appearance of the arrested person before the appropriate court and give notice thereof.
(b) If a defendant has appeared before a judge of the court on the charge contained in the complaint, indictment, or information, the bail shall be in the amount fixed by the judge at the time of the appearance. If that appearance has not been made, the bail shall be in the amount fixed in the warrant of arrest or, if no warrant of arrest has been issued, the amount of bail shall be pursuant to the uniform countywide schedule of bail for the county in which the defendant is required to appear, previously fixed and approved as provided in subdivisions (c) and (d).
(c) It is the duty of the superior court judges in each county to prepare, adopt, and annually revise a uniform countywide schedule of bail for all bailable felony offenses and for all misdemeanor and infraction offenses except Vehicle Code infractions.
Now then, let us show exactly why and how "team hamou" is LYING AND INTENTIONALLY DECEPTIVE ABOUT HOW AND WHY ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL'S BAIL WAS SET AT ONE MILLION BUCKS, SHALL WE?:
THE PUBLIC MINUTES OF THE IN CUSTODY ARRAIGNMENT OF ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL SHOW THAT ON DECEMBER 3, 2008 SHE APPEARED BEFORE JUDGE ANNEMARIE G. PACE. GUESS WHAT ELSE IT SHOWS?
ATTORNEY BRIAN WATSON PRESENT!
yes, her lawyer was THERE! Her lawyer had the chance to speak on her behalf for the bail setting!
In fact, she ASKED for release on own recognizance which was DENIED. Bail was then set at ONE MILLION DOLLARS.
HER LAWYER WAS THERE. HER LAWYER HAD THE CHANCE TO BE HEARD BY THE JUDGE, WHO STILL SET BAIL AT ONE MILLION DOLLARS. THERE IS A RECORD OF THE HEARING.
Case FVI802540 Defendant 3045972 MCCONNELL, ALEXANDRA OMA
Action: IN CUSTODY ARRAIGNMENT Date: 12/03/2008 Time: 1:30 PM
Division: V6A Hearing Status: DISPOSED
ANNEMARIE G PACE
CLERK: SDA-SHERYL ANDRADE
CERTIFIED COURT REPORTER: LH1-LEISHA HENDRIX CSR# LH1-11680
ATTORNEY BRIAN WATSON PRESENT.
DEFENDANT PRESENT IN CUSTODY.
-
PROCEEDINGS
ACTION CAME ON FOR ARRAIGNMENT
DEFENDANT ARRAIGNED.
DEFENDANT IS ADVISED OF CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY RIGHTS. (AS ATTACHED AND INCORPORATED)
-
PLEA INFORMATION
DEFENDANT PLEADS NOT GUILTY TO ALL COUNTS.
-
DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR RELEASE ON OWN RECOGNIZANCE IS DENIED.
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
ATTORNEY INFORMATION
ATTORNEY BRIAN WATSON RETAINED.
COPY OF COMPLAINT AND DISCOVERY GIVEN TO DEFENSE COUNSEL.
-
HEARINGS
PRE-PRELIMINARY HEARING SET FOR 12/09/2008 AT 8:30 IN DEPARTMENT V6.
AND BAIL/OR HEARING
DEFENDANT ORDERED TO APPEAR ON HEARING DATE.
-
CUSTODY STATUS
CASE CUSTODY - IN CUSTODY
BAIL SET AT $1000000.00.
COMMITMENT ISSUED (PENDING)
ATTORNEY NOTIFIED.
DISTRICT ATTORNEY NOTIFIED.
============= MINUTE ORDER END ================
Has anyone responded to the point about whether it would be proper for Advanced Paralegal Services to employee a paralegal who is a convicted felon without disclosing that to clients?
My goodness. I just got home from a very late, busy day at the office, and took my first glance at Oma's nonsense in several hours. You certainly seem to have pushed her buttons, Blake. Nicely done.
Mitzi! Thanks for the postcard!
I did love the whole "judges can exercise judgment in what amount is set at bail." Okay. What was the message sent by setting it at $1,000,000?
Rebecca
Rob, apparently when Oma-posting-as-Snoopy rants that he has seen the minutes of her felony case and they say no such this or that, he/she is unaware that the minutes are posted on the San Bernardino Superior Court online case files for anyone to see.
Unfortunately for her attempt to spin this, the minutes clearly show that Hamou / McConnell was represented by an attorney when she appeared before a judge who set her bail at $1,000,000. There was no "mystery" on the judge's part as to why she set the bail at that figure.
Either Hamou was too dense to follow what was happening, or she was shitting so hard in her panties that she couldn't hear. Or both.
I guess the Retard can't use google. so I'll help out that fictional character just for grins...
http://www.co.san-bernardino.ca.us/courts/genInfo/openaccess.htm
click accept. Search for criminal defendant Alexandra McConnell, click her Felony Charge, then go read ALL the minutes of each court appearance. Including the second arraignment where it clearly states "Defendant was present in Court" and her attorney Brian Watson was PRESENT, and the judge denied her Motion for OR and INSTEAD set bail at ONE MILLION DOLLARS.
As usual Blake, you are the master of concision. Bravo.
Now that this is cleared up. back to the open and salient question:
IS FULL DISCLOSURE PROVIDED TO THE CLIENTS OF ADVANCED PARALEGAL SYSTEMS AND OMA HAMOU/ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL THAT THEIR PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL LEGAL MATTERS ARE BEING WORKED ON BY SOMEONE WITH THREE FELONY CONVICTIONS FOR CRIMES OF MORAL TURPITUDE AND WHO SPENT FIFTEEN MONTHS FACING A FELONY FORGERY CHARGE FOR ALL OF 2009 PLUS? THESE PEOPLE HAVE A RIGHT TO MAKE THE INFORMED DECISION ABOUT WHO IS HANDLING THEIR CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION...
YES OR NO.
That dear Betty Ford (or whoever she is) was reading this blog when she dropped over for lunch and told me that when she needs a nurse, she wants one who has been sick herself and knows what it's like.
Maybe people who are having scrapes with the law want a paralegal who's been there many times herself.
Why, look at it this way. Who better than Ms. McConnell / Hamou to counsel people on how to reach a bail bondsman, how to dress for that first night in jail, how to put on makeup for a mug shot, where to find a cheap lawyer, what excuses work and don't work when asking for a continuance, how to duck a bench warrant, and how to pack a nourishing lunch for the midday courtroom break that will leave your breath fresh?
I just think Ms. McConnell / Hamou could be of immense service to many of the clients of Advanced Paralegal Services. If they don't use her already, they certainly should give it serious thought, don't you agree, dears?
Bye, bye.
This is another one of those days where you just have to snap Hamou out of her insanity.
Oma-posting-as-Snoopy claims she has been laying low on posting lately just to further build the case for the police that we are all stalkers.
As usual, there's a big, smelly fly in her tub of Crazy Ointment.
This whole blog was started in response to a blog she started to attack Rob's wine consulting business.
It's not really as if the police would give a woman with her arrest and conviction history the time of day. But it just bears mentioning from time to time how insanely narcissistic her logic is.
the "snoopy" one said "I am not Oma.."
1. PROVE you are not Oma. You demand I prove all sorts of stuff. This one should be easy and basic...
2. You ARE NOT JUSTIN EDWARDS EITHER by your own admission, so why should anyone believe you are not Oma??
So quiet she is! Just a quick break from making ready for the seder. Are you with family for the holiday, Robbele, or is it just you and Bob? We have the whole group coming except for Bitsy and Nitzi, they're staying in Los Anegeles.
Shalom Mitzeleh!
Well, we all know what "so quiet" usually means. Last time she was so quiet for so long she was in the San Bernardino County Jail!
Just me and Bob for Pesach this year. I was back in LA just a couple of weeks ago, so couldn't take more time off again, plus I have to save time for a special trip in June!
I will so miss Mom's Gefilte Fish...
Hope your seder is wonderful.
Rob
Happy Passover, Rob! And to you too, Mitzi, and all of your family!
Well. Things are very quiet over on the other forum. Maybe she has decided to stop the nonsense? Maybe?
And maybe there's a Passover Bunny.
RJ
RJ,
Thanks!
Oma Hamou and cadre will NEVER stop. They never have let up since before Bob's lawsuit and in the seven years since no stopping, constant "forums" blogs websites etc etc etc about how evil Bob and I are "supposed to be". The lies, distortions, self serving faked documents, all of it...
That is why I had to start this blog.
My money is on her being back in jail again, or running from arrest for something. That seems to be the only thing that keeps "team hamou" silent.
"next year in Jerusalem!"
Well, then. She's back, spewing her usual garbage. She's posting as "Handmaiden", but sounding like "Snoopy".
Rebecca
Lord RJ,
why is it that "team hamou" writes so much like Stephen King? Seriously King and all the hamou characters write hundreds and hundreds and hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of words and still manage to say NOTHING.
I mean, her blather is senseless...also more smoke and mirrors to avoid the question:
IS FULL DISCLOSURE PROVIDED TO THE CLIENTS OF ADVANCED PARALEGAL SYSTEMS AND OMA HAMOU/ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL THAT THEIR PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL LEGAL MATTERS ARE BEING WORKED ON BY SOMEONE WITH THREE FELONY CONVICTIONS FOR CRIMES OF MORAL TURPITUDE AND WHO SPENT FIFTEEN MONTHS FACING A FELONY FORGERY CHARGE FOR ALL OF 2009 PLUS? THESE PEOPLE HAVE A RIGHT TO MAKE THE INFORMED DECISION ABOUT WHO IS HANDLING THEIR CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION...
YES OR NO.
Oh I don't know Mr. Moshein, I wouldn't say it was Stephen King prose per say as it doesn't contain a myriad of bodily functions that King is so fond of inserting into his pulp fiction.
I've never actually read any King, BFF, but I gather from your (and Rob's post) that I am not missing anything?
I read The Stand, Cujo, and Carrie when I was a 16 year old. That did it for me. Although it's sort of like reading back to back Hemingway like I did (The Sun Also Rises, To Have and Have Not, A Farewell To Arms) when I was 19, it burns you out. Though, unlike King, you can pick up Hemingway and enjoy it again. .. perhaps one could liken it to over zealous wine drinkers who indulge too much into a new case of young wine. When they come back to it years later it has mellowed and one can taste the different flavors that have matured with the wine and the palate of the drinker.
And No, you're not missing anything.
Thanks! And I am slowly developing more of a palate for wine in my rapidly approaching old age. No one is more surprised than I.
It's when you pair it with food that it becomes sublime. I like a nice Merlot with chocolate covered strawberries or I make a lovely chocolate torte with fresh raspberries on top.
sandman the idiot bore wrote"FYI, Oma Hamou has informed me she is not connected to Advance Paralegal Systems nor does she know of any persons who are."
A DELIBERATE INTENTIONAL BALD FACED LIE. OMA HAMOU AKA ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL LEFT THE VICTORVILLE COURT IN A BLACK SUV REGISTERED TO ADVANCED (NOTICE THE DELIBERATE ATTEMPT TO LIE BY WRITING "ADVANCE" NOT ADVANCED) PARALEGAL SYSTEMS. Unless she got into the vehicle of a deliberate stranger she clearly KNOWS someone who is related to this company well enough to be driving their vehicle.
Yet another LIE from Oma Hamou.
Plus, don't you LOVE anyone who posts 1000 plus words to say how much they don't "care" about me, and how I'm "not worth their time" but they post over and over and over daily, thousands of words ABOUT ME!
What then do you call someone who posts daily, thousands and thousands and thousand of words ABOUT ME, for SEVEN YEARS almost daily....who then says "I just don't care because you really just don't matter."???
MORE DELIBERATE LIES FROM 'TEAM HAMOU'
Snoopy the foul mouthed dim wit wrote:"According to these TWO HOMOSEXUALS in Austin, Texas one should not TRUST or EMPLOY this woman based on their word their alleged research, conclusions, judgements and make ass-umptions, etc. without even checking to see if THEIR "facts" are correct."
Please quote EXACTLY where I wrote that "one should not trust or employ" Oma Hamou and her alias Alexandra McConnell. You can't because I did not.
I SAID IS FULL DISCLOSURE PROVIDED TO THE CLIENTS OF ADVANCED PARALEGAL SYSTEMS AND OMA HAMOU/ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL THAT THEIR PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL LEGAL MATTERS ARE BEING WORKED ON BY SOMEONE WITH THREE FELONY CONVICTIONS FOR CRIMES OF MORAL TURPITUDE AND WHO SPENT FIFTEEN MONTHS FACING A FELONY FORGERY CHARGE FOR ALL OF 2009 PLUS? THESE PEOPLE HAVE A RIGHT TO MAKE THE INFORMED DECISION ABOUT WHO IS HANDLING THEIR CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION...
I believe people should have the right to know that someone handling their confidential personal information is someone with THREE FELONY CONVICTIONS for Crimes of Fraud. I ENCOURAGE AND URGE ANYONE TO CHECK OMA HAMOU'S CRIMINAL BACKGROUND!!! I HOPE THEY DO!!!
The Three Felony Convictions and fifteen months facing Felony Forgery Charges are all PUBLIC RECORDS.
I HOPE EVERY SINGLE PERSON IN THE WORLD WHO EVER COMES INTO CONTACT WITH ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL AKA OMA HAMOU RESEARCHES HER CRIMINAL RECORDS, ARREST RECORDS AND CIVIL JUDGMENT RECORDS AGAINST HER FOR THEMSELVES!
PLEASE QUOTE ME ON THIS TEAM HAMOU. I MEAN THIS!
I HOPE EVERY SINGLE PERSON IN THE WORLD WHO EVER COMES INTO CONTACT WITH ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL AKA OMA HAMOU RESEARCHES HER CRIMINAL RECORDS, ARREST RECORDS AND CIVIL JUDGMENT RECORDS AGAINST HER FOR THEMSELVES! No need to take my word for it. DO THE RESEARCH YOURSELF!
Mr. Moshein, what are you doing running plates and registration on somebody's vehicle? That's more than a little stalker-scary, IMO.
I had nothing to do with running plates, nor did Bob. Someone else passed the information on to me. You would surprised at the number of people who have some "interest" in your BFF Hamou, who are not me or bob....
Also let me remind you that as a Legal Judgment Creditor with a valid judgment now worth over $25,000 against Oma Hamou, Bob Atchison has EVERY LEGAL RIGHT to know the address, vehicles belonging to, and any other assets of value belonging to Oma Hamou. So, finding out if she owns the black SUV Oma Hamou drives around in is well within his legal rights.
Well, correct me if I'm wrong, Mr. Moshein, from what I read about collections they need to know where you live and your phone number. There was nothing that I read in the consumer credit bureau that states one needs to know the license plate of a vehicle that somebody rides on. Though I could be wrong. . .
You are wrong. This is not "consumer credit" like a credit card. This is called Enforcement of Judgment. A California Debtor has all of their assets subject to levy, including vehicles... Google: Enforcing Civil Judgments California...
MORBOBO debbie wrote:
I was driving her around in that vehicle.
THANK YOU MORBIDLY OBESE debbie FOR CONFIRMING THAT SANDMAN LIED WHEN HE SAID OMA HAMOU DID NOT KNOW ANYONE WHO HAD ANY CONNECTION TO ADVANCED PARALEGAL SERVICES. Since YOU admit you were driving the vehicle which is registered to Advanced Paralegal Systems, that statement by sandman the bore WAS A LIE!
So. . . from what I'm reading at the Judicial Revenue Service is that you can attach property for payment with a lien. Do you have a lien on Ms. Hamous, Mr. Moshein on behalf of Mr. Atchison?
Now, BFF, you don't have to believe this, but it is in fact true. Neither Atchison or Moshein had anything to do with the license plate issue.
Furthermore, nothing was done with the information after it was obtained, was it? I notice that "Handmaiden" is making brave statements about how she and her "daughter" will fight off any person(s) who attempt to beat them up. Why on earth would anyone do that? On the other hand, it is perfectly conceivable that Oma Hamou was allowing someone else to drive her to court that day in Hamou's own car. Perhaps she was overwhelmed with trepidation (her history is that she has physical problems whenever she has to go to court). Perhaps her license was revoked because of one of the outstanding traffic warrants issued. Well, now Atchison and Moshein know that she didn't own the car.
No one actually believes in "Handmaiden" as being anyone other than Oma Hamou (or Snoopy, or Sandman, or any of the others for that matter), but let's assume for the sake of argument that Rob Moshein or Bob Atchison do believe that they actually exist.
They are of no particular importance to the case Atchison won against Hamou, or the $25,000 that she now owes him. Indeed, except for the fascinating glimpses they provide into Hamou's mind, they have no independent interest to anyone here at all. At least I don't think they do. Mitzi? Blake? Nitzana? Illuminati? Grand Shovel? Hedley? Sasha? Rev. Billy Bob? They certainly have none for me, but then I don't believe "they" exist.
Oma Hamou has been nancing around the internet for years badmouthing Bob Atchison. She has a track record that lets anyone who cares to pursue it see who the real stalker in this situation is.
And finally, although I rarely address this issue, I want to say: I am not Bob Atchison. I am not Rob Moshein. I am Rebecca Jordan. I live In New York City. I wish that Rob would stop referencing the imaginary woman's weight problem, but then I also wish that she would stop calling people faggots and retards. I certainly understand Rob Moshein's exasperation with the situation, however.
Rebecca Jordan
Oh I'm sure some helpful minion from Zanuk or wherever they are passed the plate information along. I am just wondering if Mr. Atchison has a lien against Ms. Hamou. Wouldn't a lien mean they are serious about getting their money?
HA HA! Look at that? I used "they are" and "their" correctly! Gold star for me!
(Yes, I know, I'm easily amused.)
I pity the customers of Michele and Joel Biernat's Benefit Design Group of Portland Oregon, since one of the owners (Russophile here) does not even understand the difference between a Lien Holder and a Judgment Creditor. How can such ill educated people proffer financial planning advice??
Get a clue. Judgment Creditors do not need liens...
My goodness, I could say the same of you, Mr. Moshein who has no clue about the difference between selling health insurance and selling 401K's.
*Hint, they are vastly different licenses.
And if you're so smart about enforcing the debt without the assistance of the court then why haven't you?
"I think its awesome Oma can file a motion in the state of California to vacate his fraudulent judgment he got against her in the state of Texas"
Ummm, this shows the snoopy character (and the self proclaimed "paralegal" writing it)'s total lack of understanding.
That statement is UnConstitutional. The California Court HAS NO AUTHORITY to vacate a Texas Judgment. That statement is taken out of context from a California Civil Code which discusses someone getting a California Judgment from a California Court for the unpaid amount of a "sister state" Judgment.
Which of course reminds me:
So now begins the 429th consecutive week without any law enforcement contact with me or Bob since Oma Hamou/Alexandra McConnell started threatening it. Despite that "team hamou" in one form or another has stated publicly that "Oma" with and without her lawyer(s) had already was about to contact law enforcement to insist on proceedings against us over 300 TIMES in just the last five years!
Yet NOTHING ever manages to happen... Go figure. At least they ADMIT THEY LIE ABOUT ANY CRIMINAL CHARGES BEING FILED AGAINST ME PERSONALLY FOR THESE FIVE YEARS!
As well as the beginning of consecutive Week 234 for nothing happening in the most recent round of threat of lawsuits against us, since Bob won his suit against Oma Hamou. And, NOTHING happening now for THIRTY WEEKS on the fictional "Bill of Review"...
Russophile: My goodness, I could say the same of you, Mr. Moshein who has no clue about the difference between selling health insurance and selling 401K's.
Perhaps you could. However, I am not inserting myself into a discussion pretending I know about insurance licenses whereas YOU are inserting YOURSELF HERE and pretending YOU know about enforcing Judgments.
I should remind you of President Lincoln's salient adage, Biernat:
It is better to remain silent and thought a fool then to speak up and remove all doubts.
Well, we're off to the races again. Oma-posting-as-Sandman is bragging about her famous "Bill of Review". Let's review what actually happened there.
After prattling on for weeks that "it is coming, it is coming, it is coming," she went radio silent in the final few weeks, hoping that no one would remember her "promises" to her panel of fake posters to go after Atchison and finally obtain her version of justice.
As the date approached, we began chiding her about not actually filing anything. So, in a pitiful (but hilarious) attempt to save face, she filed something the final day.
Of course, in her ill-informed hurry, she accidentally filed it against herself. When we started rolling on the floor in laughter, she hurriedly tried to correct the mistake by filing a document that basically said, "I'm filing tonight in the final few minutes, but I don't have any documents to support my claim. Just accept my filing, and I'll get back to you with the necessary documents."
The array of error and confusion around this whole episode is immense, even by the elevated standards of the rest of her life. First, she refuses to understand that a court will not entertain a Bill of Review if a filer was aware of a judgment but failed to appeal the case. Second, she missed the point that a Bill of Review cannot be had to review evidence that was at issue in the original trial, as was her claim that Atchison had forged an invoice. Third, she failed to notice that a valid filing of a Bill of Review within a four year time period includes service on the other party, which she failed to make.
This is all reminiscent of her antics with that temporary restraining order she got against Moshein and still harps about as if she actually proved her claims and obtained a permanent restraining order. In fact, the temporary order lapsed soon after it was issued, as Hamou failed to prove the claims on which it was based. But to this day she pretends that she actually has some order in place against Moshein.
She's pulling the same stunt with the Bill of Review. Yes, she sent an email to some court clerk. But no, she has not filed a claim that a court will ever hear, because it was fatally flawed on numerous fronts. Yet she will prattle on for years to come about this momentous BILL OF REVIEW that is going to bring Atchison to heel for his supposed misdeeds against her.
Hey. It's what a con artist does when trying to cover her tracks.
And The Woman Who Sued Herself continues to oblige us with an apparently inexhaustible source of targets for ridicule.
Well Mr. Moshein, I never, ever claimed to be an expert in law or enforcement thereof. I asked a question. I asked a very simple question that you still haven't answered: Why haven't you enforced this judgment then?
Seems to me you get snippy when you look unfavorable on this site.
Nobody has made public nor will make public anything Bob has done, or not done about collecting on his judgment. I will only tell you that he HAS done things, and all are within the law. "Enforcing" and actually collecting are two different things.
As the entire world is aware, your BFF Hamou aka McConnell has NO assets to attach, that have yet been found. I certainly have no intention of telling her via the internet of anything Bob has done or intends to do, with the sole exception that the moment she sets foot in Austin for any reason he will haul her before the Court for a Debtor's exam under oath.
“Common defenses to enforcement of a sister state judgment include the following: [1] the judgment is not final and unconditional . . . ; [2] the judgment was obtained by extrinsic fraud; [3] the judgment was rendered in excess of jurisdiction; [4] the judgment is not enforceable in the state of rendition; [5] the plaintiff is guilty of misconduct; [6] the judgment has already been paid; [and 7] suit on the judgment is barred by the statute of limitation in the state where enforcement is sought.”
Once again NOT A SINGLE ONE OF THESE DEFENSES APPLIES IN THIS MATTER, IDIOT.
"Extrinsic fraud" means something NOT BROUGHT UP AT TRIAL. The invoices were INTRODUCED AT TRIAL and are thus NOT "EXTRINSIC"...duh. The same reason is just one of the four major reasons why the "Bill of Review" isn't worth the paper it isn't even written on....
Ok, I can only say "What the FUCK??" is this supposed to mean?
from the idiot snoopy:
Pallasart's invoices to Enigma were never presented to the court at trial - the Law firm of George & Brothers Motion for a continuance was denied and because their appearance on behalf of Enigma, Sarskaia and Oma was a Limited Appearance Oma was without counsel. She had just been released from a hospital down there in Austin, spent the entire weekend in bed with a high temperature nursing a bad case of pneumonia. When she was told she had one hour to rush back to her hotel, get documents together and proceed to trial she had no idea where those original invoices or other related documents were.
This would mean these invoices and the below documents were never introduced at trial thus it qualifies as being proof of the "Extrinsic Fraud" perpetrated by Bob Atchison in order to ensure he won his civil case against my friend Oma Hamou.
Ummmm,
Thanks for actually now admitting that Oma Hamou has NO BASIS for challenging the judgment.
IF the allegedly fraudulent invoices were NOT INTRODUCED AT TRIAL, they could NOT HAVE HAD ANY EFFECT ON THE JURY'S DECISION!!! IF the Jury never saw them, then they could NOT have been even CONSIDERED BY THE JURY!~!~! IF THE JURY NEVER CONSIDERED THEM, THEN HOW COULD FRAUD HAVE BEEN INVOLVED IN THE JURY'S DECISION? WELL DUH.
thanks Oma for blowing your case totally up out of hot air and LIES!!!
Of course, Rob, Oma-posting-as-Snooopy fails to mention why the judge forced her to go trial on such short notice. After launching this lawsuit against Atchison, Hamou's attorneys kept asking for continuance after continuance after continuance, usually because she was not in court. Finally, the judge ran out of patience and said enough was enough and forced her to do what she claimed to be ready to do all along -- PUT UP HER PROOF.
It's the same trick she used in the Batchelor case until that judge, too, finally ran out of patience with her shenanigans and forced her to pony up the victim restitution or face trial.
Her MO is always the same. When sued, she does everything she can to avoid showing up. When criminally prosecuted, she tries to disappear (hence the oustanding bench warrant against her in L.A. County). If forced to show up (such as getting arrested), she tries every excuse in the book to buy time.
When she sues, it is only to create a claim to use on the internet that she had the goods on someone. She does not actually proceed to trial where she would actually have to pony up her proof (hence the temporary restraining order that lapsed when she failed to go to trial, where she would have had to prove her claims).
It's why that endlessly hyped and patently ridiculous Bill of Review will never proceed further than being harped about on her website. Even if she wanted to proceed, she's got that little problem about being slapped with a Debtor's Exam the minute she shows her face in a Texas courtroom.
And she knows it. Of course, that doesn't mean we won't see endless pages of meaningless and often comic "legal documents" plastered repeatedly on her "Ask Oma" forum.
- 3 felony convictions
- 3 probation violations
- 1 outstanding bench warrant
- More than a dozen adverse civil judgments
- recent mandatory victim restitution for felony forgery
That is the real legal landscape through which she bobs and weaves, not the bizarro world of law and order Oma-style she tries to create on her forum.
Leaving within the hour for Connecticut and Easter at my brother's. Frobe can tell we're going somewhere and is dashing about the apartment in transports of joy. We still smell of fresh paint in here, and he doesn't like it. By the time we get back on Easter night I hope it has completely dissipated. But it looks great! And once they got started, it only took them three days to do the whole place.
I skimmed through the nonsense she has been posting. Honestly, Oma, you are your own worst enemy when it comes to revelations of personal misconduct, but that's not exactly an earth-shattering news flash. And BFF, while I have no idea what steps Bob Atchison has undertaken to recover his judgment (because, surprise, surprise, I am not Bob Atchison), I do get at least two rather obvious components to this ongoing train wreck: Oma Hamou has no money, and essentially lives through what might euphemistically call the "kindness of strangers", along with whatever income she pulls in as a paralegal, and Oma Hamou has spent the better part of the last several years living under a variety of names and moving from place. She will undoubtedly claim that she is hiding out from her "stalkers", which apparently is the word she uses to describe anyone who questions her somewhat haphazard attitude toward things like bills, rent payments and legal judgments.
Happy Easter to those that celebrate it (does the LDS church?), and a happy weekend to the rest of you. I'm a happy girl, there are lamb chops in my future. And Rob, thanks for the suggestion about a gift wine!
Rebecca
RJ,
Always happy to help! Have a great Easter. We will be hosting our now 17th annual (!) Russian Easter Open House, so we will be having friends coming and going all afternoon and evening. The usual 50 or so this year, plus my best friend from LA has come out for the weekend, and even shipped a case of fine old Burgundy "so we have something decent to drink" as he put it...
Any decent lawyer will tell you, as four so far have already told me as regards to their own attempts to collect on THEIR judgments against Oma Hamou "You can't get blood from a rock".
Once again, Hamou manages to trip herself up and inadvertently offers proof that her own assertion is a lie.
Yesterday Oma-posting-as-Snoopy wrote, "Furthermore, a court outside of Texas took judicial notice of the Honorable Judge Livingston's findings that my friend's stalkers in Texas do pose a real threat to my friend's life."
Apparently, Hamou does not have a clue what the term "judicial notice" means. It is a legal term of art that refers to a judge's power to accept into evidence something that is such common, unrefuted knowledge that a litigant does not have to offer proof.
For instance, if a person claims they were given a bad check on February 29, 2004, a judge will take judicial notice that 2004 was a leap year and not require proof of why something could occur on a February 29. Or if a witness claims to have seen a hit-and-run on Fifth Avenue in New York City, a court will not require proof that New York City has a Fifth Avenue if the opposing counsel contests it.
By definition, a litigant is not entitled to judicial notice of a claim that another court issued something. Actual proof must be offered, such as production of a certified copy.
Clearly, Hamou is once again using some legal-sounding term that she completely misunderstands in a comical attempt to lend gravitas to some claim she is fabricating.
Hamou, you endlessly throw out Judge Livingston's name and post copies of that lapsed temporary restraining order. So now pony up your proof that "a court outside of Texas took judicial notice of Honorable Judge Livingston's findings". What court? Where? When? What judge? What cause of action?
(And, of course, Judge Livingston's "findings" lapsed when the temporary order lapsed. To become permanently binding, Hamou had to produce actual proof of her claims at trial -- something she failed to do. Production of proof does seem to be her perpetual stumbling block every time she winds up in a courtroom, doesn't it?)
actually Blake, Oma Hamou HERSELF VOLUNTARILY DISMISSED THE TRO. This was part of the non-suit of her claims, which, as Judge Triana explained to her in front of me, had the effect 'AS IF THEY NEVER EXISTED".
Yes BFF, Mormons DO believe in God and that Jesus was the son of God. We have what's known as "General Conference" which Russo has missed. It happens bi-annually on some obscure channel on television Saturday and Easter Sunday then the 1st weekend in October. Very informative and very spiritual. Sometimes the tabernacle choir sings.
Regarding the collections, you would think, that with all of the pictures that Mr. Moshein and Mr. Atchison have seen of Ms. Hamou's place and that they made fun of her car, that they would have some sort of handle on that. It's not that hard. Remember Blake, when I told you that we have a lawyer on retainer? Yeah, well, this gal we helped out (she's got 3 kids so it's not Ms. Hamou, no matter how much you'd like it to be) with a substantial amount of money and she skipped though we had lines on her and found her easily enough. Piece of cake, really.
Oh and BFF, be SAFE!!! I hear there is lots of flooding back there.
How many times did the woman with 3 kids change her name?
So, you're a Mormon? I don't know which way this will cut with you, Russophile, but I am hooked on the TV show "Big Love". Season Three, which I just watched straight through on DVD, was boffo.
It's probably to the Mormons what "The Sopranos" is to Italian-Americans. But it is one hell of an entertainment.
Oma-posting-as-Snoopy has, as expected, refused to post any proof that some judge outside of Texas took "judicial notice" of anything relating to Moshein.
What Hamou is too stupid to realize is that this supposed "judicial notice" would only be relevant to some sort of legal action to which Moshein is a party. If the case did not involve him in any way, nothing regarding the Texas action could have come into play.
And since Moshein has been given no notice of any legal action involving him in some mysterious "other state", it's obvious that Hamou is spewing another one of her lies that Moshein and/or Atchison are the subjects of secret criminal investigations, legal actions, and all manner of ominous things set in motion by Hamou.
It seems it never will dawn on Hamou that she's just too ill-informed on the law and judicial process for any of her fabrications to be remotely convincing.
Of course, we are talking about The Woman Who Accidentally Sued Herself ... also known as the Woman Harping On Ridiculous Errors.
Hellfire people were her kinfolk and we dont know where she is half the time. Ever since she left hoime with a sack fulla clothes and some dolls shes been out therte on her own. except for when she needs some money then we see her for sure.
Actually, Blake, Tanya has a few names. But! She's on Facebook and MySpace a lot and, like the lot of society these days spews her life on those forums so, no, not too hard to find her.
Hey, knock yourself out on Big Love. My friend in Utah is non-practicing and says she's got a few friends who are into the plural stuff. Honestly, I don't understand why a man would want to do that to himself. The monthly curse of them turning into a harridan shrew would be more than I could handle not to mention Forever and all Eternity.
Happy Easter everybody! Don't forget the reason reason of Easter is NOT chocolate.
Easy proof the snoopy character is lying AGAIN (you remember, just like he LIED about criminal charges EVER being filed against me AND that he has been lying every time he said his name was "Justin Edwards")...
NO COURT OUTSIDE OF TEXAS HEARD ANYTHING ABOUT ANYTHING ABOUT THE LONG DEAD TRO. What proof? Easy:
The Constitutional requirement of Due Process. NO COURT IN THE US WILL HEAR ANYTHING UNTIL THE OPPOSING PARTY HAS BEEN NOTIFIED. Period. Full Stop. You can not just waltz into some Courthouse, drop off a paper and get a hearing about anything until you file PROOF OF SERVICE UPON THE OPPOSING PARTY. No Service of Process has been served on Bob Atchison for anything. No service of process has been served on ME for anything.
No Court in the United States will do anything until fair notice according to the Rules of Procedure has been served and proven to that Court. Period.
That is also why the Fictional Bill of Review, if it actually exists, is a failure. As far as the Court is concerned, Bob Atchison knows NOTHING about it because Service of Process has not happened. Service of Process BEFORE the Statute of Limitations is REQUIRED in Texas, see generally: O'Connors Texas Rules of Civil Trials pg 126: viz: The process must be served on the defendant within the limitations period. ... If no service was requested for process for 5 months after suit was filed the Plaintiff fails to prove diligence to serve as soon as possible and the Statute of Limitations will apply and prevent the Petition from being heard. Hansler v. Mainka 807S.W.2d3,5 (Tex.App Corpus Christi no writ)
Let us count the months: November, December, Jan., Feb., March, April...hmm, that's five.
Strike Five Oma. Bill of Review dead for failure to even request service of process for five months after filing.
Care to come up with MORE LIES THERE SNOOPY??
sorry Oma creating more lies as snoopy. I can easily PROVE there is no service of Process on Bob Atchison for the fictional Bill of Review. Call up the Court Monday morning and ask. It is not on file and in fact the Court has not even BEEN ASKED to serve process, that is a FACT JACK.
Therefore the bill of review is dead.
Oh and the currently licensed actively practicing member of the State Bar of California who is staying with us this weekend laughed at the notion that Oma can have the Texas Judgment vacated for any reason and says the law you cited does not apply to this situation. He will gladly represent Bob if she tries.
Omele, sweetness, not for anything, but really? This is the best you can up with, darling? That Bob has been served but hasn't told Rob?
Now, darling, I'm sure there were lots of things you didn't tell your husbands while you were married, and porobably lots of thinks you didn't tell the poor old man you were conning later on, but this is where your life experience doesn't jibe with that of normal people, my little nafkeh. Normal couples share things like when one of them is served with legal papers. I mean, I totally understand why this would be a hard concept for you to grasp, darling, given that process servers probably had your address on speed dial for awhile, and I am sure you had your reasons for not telling people.
But darling, that's not normal.
Have a Easter, darling, but go easy on the chocolate. A minute on the lips, a year on the hips, as Auntie Masada used to say.
Mitzi
I meant have a happy Easter, Oma. It's a holiday that has always puzzled me. Christmas I get, because who doesn't like presents, but what is going on with the rabbit, the candy and Him coming out of the tomb? It just seems like a lot of mixed messages.
A great holiday! Lamb was eaten, massive amounts of chocolate were consumed. Don't worry, Mitzi, I have an appointment with my trainer after work tomorrow. I am determined to shed about ten pounds before the summer. Easter was a kind of last hurrah. My sister-in-law made a really delicious blueberry buckle. In fact, the last piece is sitting on my desk as I type this, waiting to meet its' fate along with a cup of coffee.
So it looks as though Oma and the cast of imaginary characters over there took the holiday off, good for her. I see you had company, Rob? A lawsyer, no less? I am glad to hear that your lawyers friends find her legal interpretations funny, mine have been snickering for months.
BFF, did you have people over? Were either of your boys able to make it home? Did you cook? I hope you weren't offended by my question about Latter Day Saints and Easter. My knowledge of your church is haphazard, and that's putting it kindly. I thought that they believed Jesus came to Central America after he was finished in Palestine? I also didn't understand the reference to some kind of teleconference?
Has anyone heard from Penelope? I'm worried about the poor thing. Blake sent me a lovely e-card for Easter.
Happy Monday!
Rebecca
No, BFF, we went to my MIL's for a brunch. She is a HUGE Nick Swisher fan so we exited when the game started. We went on a cruise with her last year to support Swish's Wishes, his charity. Had a tasty Costco ham and deviled eggs, YUM!
Your lamb sounds delightful though, I love lamb, though it's not Mr. Russo's fav.
Don't worry about not knowing about Mormons, it's a little different in some respects yet very similar in others. We believe that after Christ had risen he visited his children from Nephi and Lehi over in central America.
Normally you go to church at a stake center every Sunday. Church is 3 hours long. I enjoy it and learn so much, I am just a lazy bones to GO! Sad to say. Twice a year they have BIG meetings. One is the first weekend in April, the other is the first weekend in October. People used to take their kids on a road trip to the temple in Salt Lake twice a year to see the General Conference. Now with technology we can view General conference from the comforts of our home. The topics usually range from something like "How to be a better wife" to "How to deal with an increasingly dangerous society." We are headed up by a Prophet, current prophet is Thomas S. Monson. A very good man, though Russo favored Gordon B. Hinkley. He really, really seemed to understand what families were going through in a society that wants to tear them apart.
So there's the Reader's Digest version. Mr. Russo's a Catholic.
And BTW, none of us here understand why the Obama administration is treating Isreal so very rudely. We are very lucky they are our allies. . .
Thank you for asking about Penelope, Ms. Jordan. She asked me to watch this forum for her during her absence, but I forgot where she had put her password until I came across it on the fob to the cream cheese cabinet key.
There has been something of an unfortunate incident. Penelope got a call from the Oklahoma State Police about Felineus. She still has not been able to tell me everything about the conversation, but it had something to do with a form of feline desecration that she kept babbling "dare not speak its name" and a truck driver named Bruce.
At any rate, she got the call just before Betty Ford (or whatever her name is) dropped over for a watercress sandwich. As it turned out, they went on quite a sandwich binge, and Penelope dropped the mayonnaise jar, slipped, broke her hip, and wound up in the Shady Oaks Holistic Relaxation Center. (Betty Ford, or whatever her name is, made a pass at one of the paramedics, barfed on him while trying to help him get his radio off his belt and, as they were taking her away, kept muttering something about now she would be needing the number for Acme Bail Bonds???)
Penelope sends Easter Greetings to everyone and promises that she will switch to liverwurst sandwiches when she checks out of Shady Oaks. Lord, I do hope so. Watercress can be an evil vegetable.
We both hope you all had a Happy Easter, or a nice early spring weekend if you hold to one of those other beliefs.
Oscar Autumnvale
Darling Oscar,
Thank G-d you are there to look after her! I warned her about those watercress sandwiches months ago, darling, but she wouldn't listen. At least she is being looked after! But really, darling, you need to find out who that woman is that Pennele has been hitting the mayo bottle with. Former First Lady or not, I don't think she is such a good influence, if you know what I mean, and I think you do.
Russophile Lady, I am happy you had a nice Easter, although I personally could have done without the ham, darling. And thanks for the kind words about Israel being such a great ally for the U.S. of A. What can I say? We try. I myself am not all that thrilled with you-know-who and his shark eyes, but at the rate he's going I can't imagine this government is going to last for much longer. And darling, keep it to yourself, but most of us actually kind of like Obama. Such a nice man, and the wife looks lovely.
I'm not sure I understand the deal with You-Know-Who heading over to central America. Is the story supposed to be that the people living there were Jews? Darling, there were some lost tribes, but really? Central America? That's a long walk, darling Russophile Lady, not to mention the oceans, and my people aren't so good with that kind of thing. It took us forty years to get from verstunkene Egypt to where we are now, and let's face it, it's kind of a day trip in terms of distance. When did we get all the way to central America? How?
Rivka, you go ahead and eat all of the chocolate you want, darling, you should only enjoy your food and be well.
Robbele, I hope your holidays were wonderful. Next year in Jerusalem, darling, although I have to tell you, we went to Jerusalem for a day last week, and we all agreed, next year in Majorca.
Mitzi
Now begins the 430th consecutive week without any law enforcement contact with me or Bob since Oma Hamou/Alexandra McConnell started threatening it. Despite that "team hamou" in one form or another has stated publicly that "Oma" with and without her lawyer(s) had already was about to contact law enforcement to insist on proceedings against us over 300 TIMES in just the last five years!
Yet NOTHING ever manages to happen... Go figure. At least they ADMIT THEY LIE ABOUT ANY CRIMINAL CHARGES BEING FILED AGAINST ME PERSONALLY FOR THESE FIVE YEARS!
As well as the beginning of consecutive Week 235 for nothing happening in the most recent round of threat of lawsuits against us, since Bob won his suit against Oma Hamou. And, NOTHING happening now for THIRTY ONE WEEKS on the fictional "Bill of Review"...
How can I be so certain? I just got back from the District Courthouse downtown on Guadalupe Street. The nice guy in the Records office looked up the file on the Bill of Review and let me see the screen showing NOTHING has happened there, including a request for Process.
My good friend the California Civil attorney who practices in both California and Federal Court, explained that the section quoted by the fictional idiots on team hamou, 1710 et seq, apply ONLY to the same defenses a California resident has for California judgments issued, and that CCP section 469 et seq define those defenses.
473.b The court may, upon any terms as may be just, relieve a partyor his or her legal representative from a judgment, dismissal, order, or other proceeding taken against him or her through his or her mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect. The "extrinsic fraud" as explained in the California Code has NOTHING TO DO WITH ANYTHING OF THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE. THE EXTRINSIC FRAUD APPLIES ONLY TO PREVENTING THE DEFENDANT FROM LEARNING ABOUT BEING SUED. PERIOD.
"If" some high powered California lawyer told "snoopy" the dimwit "that Oma COULD move to vacate the judgment in California based on the facts of this case, he should hope his malpractice insurance is paid in full"...exact words from my friend.
Maybe she is planning to sue the lawyer who gave her the bad advice? It would replenish the coffers.
RJ
Well, that would be a change. So far it's been her lawyers who have sued her. Twice.
Mitz, that's just the way that that religion is set up. I happen to think a lot of religions are really good, to paraphrase the Jaycees: We believe that faith in God gives meaning and purpose to human life. Your God, my God, whomever's God. It's all good. It's the people who are flawed. You are correct about the ham, any pig product--in my research--really isn't good for you. Which is probably why they make it so darned tasty!!
You know my position on Obama. I have issues with somebody who says this is the most transparent government ever when clearly it's not, tripled the budget w/o any results, stacked his cabinet with known Marxists, and says he's going to kick the lobbiests out of Washington when they had the best year ever last year, oh, but wait: It's all Bushes fault. (Did I mention he hasn't the kahunas to take responsibility for his government?)
Chris Dodd has a little bill on his desk he's wanting to peddle that scares the bejesus out of me. If amnesty is jammed through, which is on the docket, this is next. And that will be the end of capitalism as we know it.
But! Enough with the doom and gloom!
How's tricks Mr. Moshein? Any good wine tips you got?
Well, ain't those the licks.
Here I am hiding under some smelly stained sofa at a Motel 6 flicking my tail and trying to protect my kitty hole from Bruce, and that damned old biddy Penelope is propped up in some fancy relaxation center trying to kick the watercress habit.
And there's more than one truck driver named Bruce. Lots more.
Given how many times you have publicly stated how incompetent I am as wine expert, and how equally many times you have publicly written how horrible you believe my palate to be, I am rather surprised that you are now asking for wine tips from me.
Oh c'mon, indulge me. You know you want to dispense your wine wisdom. I am particularly fond of Sangeoviese but haven't found any good ones about. Any suggestions?
My favorite Italian Sangiovese, (actually a blend because it has about 15% Cabernet Sauvignon) which is available readily in most cities in the country is Monte Antico, Toscana IGT. Should retail for around $12.
Which is about $14.99 in Oregon due to the *sin* tax, *sigh*.
*scribble, scribble* Thank you sir. I shall look at Fred Meyer's first (Kroger to those east of the Rockies). Hopefully it will be there. Russo loves Cabernet Mr. Russo is the Merlot hound.
Not at the Fred's in Tigard and they have a pretty decent wine selection. Alas! The search (and The Beat) goes on. . . .
Do you have Trader Joe's? They carry it. It's also at Ralph's in Calif if thats up there as well.
No Ralphs up here, is that Vons? So many have assimilated each other. I do know Albertson's bought out all the piggly-wigglies.
Ah! Was just at Trader Joe's and dropped a chunk of change, Mr. Russo's glueten free and dairy free crap. Goat yogurt costs over $5 a pint. Yeeesh. I had picked up a bottle of lower end Sangieovese from there and relegated it to the spaghetti sauce. . . I shall go again! Thanks!
Felineus, at least you're alive! It's been just awful here since you left. Watercress sandwiches all day long. Mr. A and her arguing all the time. That Betty Ford (or whatever her name is) woman coming by at all hours for more sandwiches. You remember Oma? She used to call them "cocktails" or "my only friends". I don't know why humans can't make up their minds what to call those things they're always downing.
Anyway I wanted to warn you about trying to get back home to Palm Beach. There's been this outbreak of giant pythons down here because some pet snakes escaped and started breeding. They say there are a half million of them in the Everglades and they're showing up in populated areas. They're eating alligators and even PETS!! It's on the news almost every night about somebody catching another one and they even declared a hunting season.
I tell you, I can hardly catch a cat nap from worry. Why, just yesterday I heard ..... Hold on a minute. There's this odd scraping sound out on the lanai. Let me go look and I'll be right back.
Mewlie?
Today is Betty Ford's birthday. She's 92. I just thought everyone would want to know.
Giant snakes? Run, Mewlie, run!
RJ
Well it's a darn good thing Felineous and Mewlie are in this neck of the woods we have had many a coyote sighting. Mr. Russo and I walked Thomas the other day and wondered why somebody would let their German Sheppard out just wandering around and when we got closer we noticed it wasn't a German Sheppard. . . .Came across a woman with one of those yappy mop dogs a couple days ago, you know the kind, all stringy fur looks like you stick a mop handle in 'em and do your floor. Anywho, she said her friend called her the other day and a coyote was sitting in her front yard. Probably waiting for little doggies and kitties. Things were so much easier when he was chasing down that Road runner.
One of my old bosses lives in Sun City outside of Phoenix, and when we last spoke he told me that a small dog had actually been killed and partially eaten by a coyote.
And suddenly the chicken sandwich I ordered in for lunch no longer looks quite as tasty.
I also noticed that Oma's threats against yoy have officially run longer than World War II (at least for the United Staes; I am sure she will be able to outdistance Germany and Britain before it is all over). I assume Bob still hasn't 'fessed up to the fact that he has been secretly served!
No. I didn't think so.
My uncle lives out in the desert in Arizona, close to New Mexico, and for years now he calls my Aunt's cats the "Coyote Chow"...
Isn't it uncanny how much control Hamou has over all the posters on her forum?
When one falls silent for days on end, they all fall silent for days on end.
Nothing for 5 days.
Hmmm ... I wonder if Acme has heard from her lately?
Clang!
Truly typical that the hugely fat grossly obese loser on disability (who thinks she is so superior to everyone else...take a look in your double wide mirror and lack of genuine employment. Does California Disability KNOW you aren't so disabled as to drive around in other people's cars all day and spend all day long in a courtroom?? You COULD have spent a day driving to work and sitting at your JOB....) who goes by "debbie" tries to lamely justify the fact that just all at once the fictional characters of team hamou ALL go quiet.
The reality was that the last time they all went so quiet for so long was in fact when Oma's wide butt was stuck in the San Bernardino JAIL.
Interesting that only "Handmaiden" has posted on Hamou's forum since April 3, and this blog is not being hit from any of Hamou's usual haunts.
It seems that Snoopy, Sandman, Mike, Cheryl, Pita, Netsue Keto (or whatever his/her name is) and all the other avid defenders of Hamou have disappeared all at once.
If we are to believe that they are not Hamou or that Hamou is actually able to post right now, perhaps we could hear from someone other than Handmaiden? Of course, Handmaiden could open up an account under one of those names in an attempt to keep up the appearance that Hamou can still post. But then the date on which the account was opened will not match those of the original "members".
Let's see if Hamou can do this, me buckos.
If not, this really is looking more and more like one of her "jail breaks".
Dear Blake,
I think you're right. Goodness, she leads an exciting life!
And "Handmaiden" does field work for the U.S. government? If that means "she" is a census worker, I wonder if "she" counts all of the imaginary posters? Oh my Lord, maybe "she" knows my boyfriend Daryn Harrington's real address!
Help a sister out, "Handmaiden"!
Rebecca
I missed most of the original run of Designing Women because I was working overseas, but I had caught a bit of it in reruns during the mid-1990s. I also saw Dixie Carter on Broadway in Thoroughly Modern Millie. I was sorry to hear about her passing.
My favorite recent Handmaiden comment was when she described herself as "attractive".
My God, we've seen the photos of the perp walk from the courthouse to the SUV.
Blake, the definition of a "perp" is somebody who commits a crime. Since you've seen pictures of Debbie, then you know she is not Oma which means you're accusing Debbie of being a criminal. I believe you might want to rethink that.
The term "perp walk" is not restricted to just the convicted in common parlance. In fact, it most frequently is used to denote the police parading a suspect before onlookers on the way to an arraignment or to jail upon arrest.
However, in this case I was obviously using the term facetiously, as there were no police in the picture.
In any case, while there were two women in that courthouse parking lot photo, I don't know that either were Debbie or Oma. The woman who was there that day to make restitution for a forged check was prosecuted as Alexandra McConnell. The woman who drove her away was just some very large person with stringy hair who some characters on the "Ask Oma" forum claim is named Debbie.
That's all just part of the fun in chronicling the criminal, legal, and comical sagas of Oma / Alexandra / Louise / Rebecca / Jordan / Taylor / Chedid / Hamou / Demian / Ashkenazy / McConnell / ad infinitum.
What I find amusing is that, no matter how long the list of aliases this scamster manages to acquire, it is still shorter than the list of her known convictions, adverse civil judgments, and oustanding warrants.
That's quite a feat.
Darling "Handmaiden", the first step is to think you're pretty, so good for you!
The second step will be to rethink the dress. The third will be a good cut. And before you know it, you'll be walking!
Tinele is in the slammer? Oy
Postcard from Bitsy and Nitzi, they're up by the Bay area, so beautiful! Also, Omele, my sisters were the ones who snapped the pictures of the "perp walk", and no, darling, they didn't use a camera phone. They used one of those darling i-devices, so small it is, and it wasn't a photograph, darling, it was a video that they freeze-framed for a few stills. You probably didn't recognize Nitzi, darling, she's changed her hair. You actually spoke to Bitsy, though, just enough for her to hear your squeaky little voice (so cute, Bitsy said you sound like a child, darling!).
Mitzi
My dears, hello from Shady Oaks, which is just the nicest resort hotel you can imagine. So very elegant.
I have a question, though. The desk staff tell me that a very genteel-sounding gentleman from Chandler, Arizona is inquiring after my health. But, my pets, I don't know anyone from Chandler, which I'm sure must be a very lovely place.
Do any of you know who he might be?
And, by the way, darlings. If any of you could drop off a couple of slices of rhubarb pie, I would be most appreciative. I have been unable to find a single watercress sandwich here and have been told I'll never see one again. But I'm sure rhubarb pie is just as good, if you get my drift. And I'm sure you do, my sweets.
Ta ta.
Your Penelope
Somebody asked me an interesting question. Thought I'd put it out here.
CAL. Business and Professions CODE § 6452
(a)It is unlawful for a person to identify himself or herself as a paralegal on any advertisement, letterhead, business card or sign, or elsewhere unless he or she has met the qualifications of subdivision (c) of Section 6450 and performs all services under the direction and supervision of an attorney who is an active member of the State Bar of California or an attorney practicing law in the federal courts of this state who is responsible for all of the services performed by the paralegal
So California Law means Oma Hamou aka Alexandra Oma McConnell aka Alexandra McConnell aka Oma McConnell holds herself out as a Paralegal in California. Fair enough. Therefore, under California Law, she MUST do this work under a supervising Attorney, she can't do it herself without an attorney.
SOOOO the question is:
Does the supervising Attorney for whom Oma Hamou/Alexandra McConnell actually KNOW that the paralegal for whom he is completely responsible IS A THREE TIME CONVICTED FELON AND SPENT ALL OF 2009 FACING FELONY FORGERY CHARGES??
Now, Penny, ease up on the desire for rhubarb, it's not good for you. No matter how much you like it. The longer you can avoid watercress sandwiches and rhubarb, the clearer the world will become, and won't that be wonderful?
Of course Oma may not actually be an official paralegal, Rob; she could be calling herself a "horse whisperer" or an "animal care consultant" for all you know, simply because she likes our four-footed friends. Perhaps because she has spent an inordinate amount of time with the legal system, she feels entitled to call herself a "paralegal". Which is actually kind of modest, come to think of it. Given the amount of experience with lawyers, courts and the penal system that she has, we are lucky that Oma hasn't taken to calling herself the Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court.
Wait a minute. Isn't there a slot open on that august bench? Maybe that's where's she been, getting herself ready for the nomination process!
Rebecca
Morbidly obese debbie with the stringy unwashed hair wrote:
"he would be putting all this energy and time into working against those who actually cause harm to others"
Ask the following people, please, if they feel in any way "harmed" by Oma Hamou/Alexandra McConnell:
Me, Bob Atchison, Mrs. Batchelor, Marcus Demian, Monique Hahn, Scott Landerstesse, Father Markell, the Russian lady who had an international telephone bill run up by her "houseguest Oma" that was more money than she earned in SIX MONTHS, the entire family of William Donald Morton, Reed Elsevier dba Variety, the law firm of Foster, Malish, Blair & Cown; Westar Legal Enterprises; Freeman, Freeman & Smiley LLP; Global Insight; NTT Verio.
Go on ask them all...I'll wait.
Damn you, Alexandra McConnell! Damn you, Penelope Autumnvale!
Damn you, Mrs. Batchelor!
Damn you, Handmaiden von Sayton!
Damn everyone associated with this whole sordid Oma Hamou mess!
I been on the road again and stopped over last night at a Hampton Inn near Hoboken. Some inner voice had been urging me to head for Hoboken all last week. She (it was a very aristocratic sounding female voice) told me interesting things would await me once I got there.
After the night clerk fell asleep I was able to log onto the internet and check the Daily Mews for the day's news from the cat world. And THIS is what I found there:
SAD ENDING FOR MAIMED HERO
Felix Lickballs, who had recently become a folk hero among those of the feline persuasion, was found dead shortly after lunch hour yesterday at the entrance to the parking lot of Eric's Cyber Cafe on 8th Street in Palmdale.
Felix, who was one of the most flexible and dedicated leg-hiking ball lickers the feline world has seen for some time, had recently been castrated by his human "rescuer", a sodden old bag named Penelope Autumnvale of Palm Beach. Said Autumnvale had become incensed when she learned that Felix had divulged on the internet the secret code words relating to a drinking cabal she hosted with another heavy tippler, Betty Ford (or whatever her name is).
Having risen from such ignominy to become the poster kitty for the abuse cats suffer at the hands of humans who misunderstand the ritual purposes of ball licking, Felix had struck out on his own to get back to his roots in the southern California low-rent desert district, where he had reportedly once lived until some kerfluffle about a forged rent check resulted in a conflagration and hairy nighttime escape/rescue.
According to reliable feline witnesses of Felix' sad demise, he was walking down the street when he happened to plop down in a parking lot entrance and begin licking his nether regions somewhat distractedly. One witness reported a far-away look in his eyes and a leg lifted with something less than entusiasm.
Suddenly, witnesses say a large black SUV was heard cranking up and, before anyone could warn Felix, it came roaring out of the parking lot with its springs creaking and sagging slightly on the driver's side. The windows were down and stringy hair was blowing across the driver's face, apparently causing her not to see Felix desultorily licking his nether regions right in front of her.
The whole cat community mourns the passing of its ill-starred hero. A wake was planned at the dumpster behind the Caddylac Fish Market on E Avenue, with burial to follow on the vacant lot next door. But, as often happens, the damned crows got there first.
Hi, everybody.
hey Curt! Welcome!
You happen to be visitor number
2107 Shellbark, Curt! I've been counting for what its worth.
By the way, now is the 431st consecutive week without any law enforcement contact with me or Bob since Oma Hamou/Alexandra McConnell started threatening it. Despite that "team hamou" in one form or another has stated publicly that "Oma" with and without her lawyer(s) had already was about to contact law enforcement to insist on proceedings against us over 300 TIMES in just the last five years!
Yet NOTHING ever manages to happen... Go figure. At least they ADMIT THEY LIE ABOUT ANY CRIMINAL CHARGES BEING FILED AGAINST ME PERSONALLY FOR THESE FIVE YEARS!
As well as consecutive Week 236 for nothing happening in the most recent round of threat of lawsuits against us, since Bob won his suit against Oma Hamou. And, NOTHING happening now for THIRTY TWO WEEKS on the fictional "Bill of Review"...
Talk about a kick in the shins. I googled my name last night and found that some Oma Hamou woman is running a forum about some guys in Texas. Doesn't look like she much likes them.
But she was calling me all sorts of names just because I dropped by here to say hi because a friend of mind told me it's a lot of fun to read stuff here.
Do they really let a woman with her criminal history and all those unpaid civil judgments and outstanding warrants run around the internet calling other people names?
Oh, Curt, don't worry about what that Snoopy character says about you. My sister Tinker Bell tells me that cartoon characters can't be trusted for anything.
I wonder if the place on Shellbark came partially furnished like the Batchelor place. It's a lot easier to get out in a hurry if you don't have much stuff of your own.
She seems to be renting stuff that's on the market but can't find any buyers. At least the Batchelor place wasn't a repo. Shame she trashed it so badly.
You really have to be careful with renters.
Say, Curt,
Do you have any idea why you showing up caused the already psychotic snoopy character to have such a clear meltdown?
All you did was show up and she, oh sorry "he", starts spewing off like the volcano in Iceland. What did you do to Oma? I know you aren't me or Bob, so I don't understand why YOU sent her into such a rage...
Oh, by the way, did any of you guys see me quoted yesterday by the Food Editor of the Austin American Statesman in the newspaper again? He called ME for a quote about this weekends Hill Country Wine and Food Festival! I'll be a bit busy this weekend actually, as the Festival Folks gave me free tickets to any of their events I want to attend. Pretty cool...
The "place on Shellbark"???
I'm Shellbark. Curtis Lee Shellbark. What are you talking about, Flower Bell?
Gee, Mr. Moshein, I don't know why Snoopy turned over his water bowl when I showed up.
Same thing happens to my brother Glen Oaks sometimes though.
Hey gang!
Bob just got word from the United States Library of Congress that they want to archive and add the Alexander Palace Time Machine website to their collection! The details are on the website...
Why is "snoopy" psychotic?
"psychotic" is characterized by a loss of contact with reality and an inability to think rationally. A psychotic person often behaves inappropriately and is incapable of normal social functioning.
(see American Heritage Science Dictionary).
Curt Shellbark comes in, and only says "Hi everybody". I welcome him. Thats it.
"snoopy" goes off on some tear saying :
Oh lookey here another make believe person created out of the evil twisted minds of Bob Atchison and Rob Moshein to torment, harass, opress and stalk my friend Oma Hamou
and puts up some image stolen off the web calling me "creepy stalker guy"...
How can one make the leap that someone registers here and only says "hi" is A. NOT who they say they are; B. Bob or me; C: tormenting harassing, opress (sic) Oma Hamou?
Is that a RATIONAL reaction?? Is that RATIONAL THINKING?
Lord, its not like he came in here and openly published Oma Hamou's home address and was urging people to show up at her doorstep...
Oh, and Judge Livingston never ever said anything remotely calling me a "stalker" which shows how out of touch with reality 'snoopy' is...
THUS clearly snoopy displays psychotic behavior.
Dear ones,
Just a quick reality check here. There is no "Snoopy".
Justin lives quite happily in Hawaii with his wife and a few cats. He does not post on Oma Hamou's blog as "Snoopy". That is actually Oma.
Meanwhile . . . it has been kind of interesting to watch the flailing around over there. The "defence" offered for Oma's behavior was breathtaking in its' gall, especially in regard to the Morton family's experience with the lady. It is Bob Atchison's fault that she can't pay her bills? Hell, she hasn't paid Bob Atchison, kids. I would also like to hear the various law firms' takes on the Hamou Experience; the idea that they are jolly about having been stiffed of their fees is a little far-fetched.
And Curt, I know exactly how you feel. One day you are minding your business, and the next some con woman is splashing your name all over her website.
And yet she doesn't seem to like it when people do it to her.
Go fig.
Rebecca
I beg to differ BFF, Snoopy-Justin does exist. I am not sure where all the paralegal thing came up though I dont' remember Ms. Hamou or anyone claiming they are a paralegal over there on that forum.
Well I have to run, tea party is calling me!! Ta Ta!
Oh, now, BFF, there is not! ("Snoopy", I mean). I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree!
I love tea parties! I got hooked on the beverage when I lived in London during grad school!
Well, once again Hamou has loaded her forum with pages and pages of documents and posts that supposedly "prove" her various claims and complaints against Bob Atchison and Rob Moshein.
And, once again, we have to set the record straight.
Hamou neither has proved nor can prove a damned thing she argues. Nor will she ever.
She prattles on and on about a temporary restraining order she obtained based on her claims of things she was going to prove in court. However, when it came time to produce her proof, she dropped the case, and the temporary restraining order lapsed.
She claims Atchison used a forged document to obtain a judgment against her. However, the jury heard that argument and found against her.
She then claimed she had "new" evidence of his forgery that she was going to prove through an appeal. However, the deadline for filing an appeal came and went, with her never producing her proof.
She next claimed she had engaged a major law firm to aid her in filing a Bill of Review to overturn the judgment she said Atchison fraudulently obtained against her. There was, of course, no law firm as demonstrated by the fact that she waited until the final minutes before the filing deadline and then accidently sued herself for relief instead of Atchison. Moreover, she failed to serve process on Atchison within the statutory deadline, which is a requirement of filing a valid Bill of Review. Obviously no law firm was involved. And, equally obviously, she is once again failing to provide proof before a court of her "legal" claims.
This is just her M.O. She will make a claim on the internet and sometimes file a spurious court action to generate some pleadings or temporary rulings that she can then use to market her internet claims. What she will NEVER do, though, is haul her lying ass voluntarily into a court and produce real proof to a judge or jury of her claims.
The ONLY times that claims relating to Oma Hamou have been put to actual proof in a courtroom have resulted in her three felony convictions, her arrests on probation violations, her forced restitution to a victim for forgery, and her more than a dozen adverse (and still unpaid) civil judgments.
She, on the other hand, has NEVER PROVED in a court of law a single damned thing she has claimed. And she never will.
She might think her chronic lies will sway someone on the internet. Apparently they have once or twice. But she knows those same lies will fail her in a courtroom, where she will have to produce proof and where she will never appear of her own accord.
Sorry I've not been around much, but been busy with the Hill Country Wine and Food Festival stuff. I had a great time catching up with some old friends and making some new ones. Lots of wine involved of course.
Blake, as usual spot on. As I have said for years now, those who CAN, DO. Those who CAN NOT, just spend years talking about it.
Oma Hamou has DONE NOTHING. Seriously. Well over FIVE YEARS since Bob WON his lawsuit. FIVE YEARS since Oma Hamou NON SUITED her claims. FIVE YEARS her mouthpieces post the same crap, over and over and over and over many hundreds of times.
BUT. WHAT EXACTLY HAS OMA HAMOU ACTUALLY DONE???
On the last possible day, literally in the 23rd HOUR of that last day, she emails one page to the Courthouse, that doesn't even properly set forth the correct Plaintiff or Defendant, which does not begin to conform to the Rules of Court.
That's it. NOT ONE THING MORE has Oma Hamou done.
MANY threats of lawsuits, not one of which ever got filed. MANY threats of "police reports" NOT ONE OF WHICH HAS EVER BEEN SUBSTANTIATED. EVER.
This is her typical pattern over the years. THIS is the crux of her con game. And YES it is a con game.
She gets one little thing, for example writing TO the State Department, who reply with some innocuous drivel "wishing her success on her project"...which they do to EVERY person who writes...She then uses this to proclaim the US Government is "SUPPORTING" her...She sends the President an invitation to her fictional party. The White House sends a form letter of regret. (My best friends used to invite the sitting President every year to their Halloween party, just for the letter of regret!) She then uses the form letter from the White House to trumpet the "President's support" of her "project".
She spends $4,800 to get Sautov to sign a contract, which she never does ANYTHING to fulfill, but she loudly trumpets her "Contracts" as "proof" of her fictional project. Sure, she has a binder full of paper she calls a "script" just to play the semantic game of proving it was a "real" project.
She has the future "POSSIBLE USE" of a building in Pushkin as her offices for her project AFTER SHE RESTORES THE BUILDING. She never DOES A THING yet still publicly advertises that address as her EXISTING RUSSIAN OFFICE.
The woman and her "friends" ( all TALK a lot. BUT THE COLD HARD REALITY IS NOTHING EVER ACTUALLY HAPPENS AND NEVER EVER WILL.
She has done ZERO for the last six years in that regard, except talk talk talk about "resurrecting" her dead project. Jesus HIMSELF will resurrect long BEFORE her "movie" ever will.
She lives in pseudo-luxury, renting cheap decent homes in the middle of nowhere in the desert so she can have pergo floors and Uba Tuba cheap granite counters and five bedrooms and three baths for $1500 a month rent to the bank that repossessed the house in foreclosure. She can squeak that much cash as a part time paralegal and maybe kiting a few checks like she did with Mrs. Batchelor.
Let her type away into the darkness as she has done for years. She is nothing. Nobody.
Has the Library of Congress asked HER for her work? Hell no.
Does any newspaper call her for her opinions on anything (except maybe the conditions inside San Bernardino County Jail)? Hell no.
She is a convicted Felon. She has been arrested some nine time and spent MONTHS in jail. Of course it is never actually "her" fault.
How many times have Bob or I been arrested? zero. Never been in jail.
How many times could be remotely possible for one human being to be "inadvertantly" or "wrongly" arrested??? Once? Twice at the outside. Three, doubtful. NINE TIMES? Beyond reason. Where there is smoke there is fire.
Occams razor: the simplest explanation is always correct. Oma Hamou's explanations are always long winded, rarely credible tales. Cut thru her bs.
Thought of you Mr. Moshein. Watched that lovely "Bottle Shock" on Friday with Alan Rickman, aka Severus Snape. Love that man, you can see so much emotion on his face I believe he's sorely underused as an actor. Reminds me of another fav Ian McKellen who can convey so much with a flick of his pinky.
BFF, no silly! Political tea party, the high tea will be sometime in July when we take the Alaskan cruise. I believe we get to stay the day in Vancouver BC.
I liked Bottle Shock, but the story bothered me because I've known Beau Barrett for over fifteen years and the movie's story wasn't really the way it happened. The love interest thing was fiction, and the Chardonnay was going to be sold in bulk, but not destroyed, and was just sitting in a warehouse, so that part was made up as well...Stuff like that.
As a "movie" though it was fun. Just don't take the story as the truth.
It was fun and it reminded me of my ex Fil. This was about the time he started running down to Napa and Sonoma and would come home with cases and cases of wine. (This was before he became partial owner of the winery up here.) He told me a story of when he and his wife stumbled into a little winery you couldn't see and they bought a couple cases of the zinfandel. The guy didn't even have the labels on them yet and mailed them to him later. It was Ravenswood.
"Accidentally" arrested 9 times?
As a wise old dog once told me, "you may not always be able to see over the dashboard, but you'd damned well better be able to smell what's coming through the vents."
Mitzi! What are you doing posting under my BFF's moniker?? Where is she?? WHAT DID YOU DO WITH HER???
Oh my God! Is Rebecca missing? When was she last seen?
I'm right here, Blake! What is going on? I haven't posted in five days!
BFF! Was there something in your tea?
RJ
We're real, I tell you. We're all REAL.
Well, at least as real as they are.
We'll look into this right away.
Leave out of this our Latvian friends, you criminal person.
Sorry RJ, I know this bugs you, but I promised to keep this current:
Now is the 432nd consecutive week without any law enforcement contact with me or Bob since Oma Hamou/Alexandra McConnell started threatening it. Despite that "team hamou" in one form or another has stated publicly that "Oma" with and without her lawyer(s) had already was about to contact law enforcement to insist on proceedings against us over 300 TIMES in just the last five years!
Yet NOTHING ever manages to happen... Go figure. At least they ADMIT THEY LIE ABOUT ANY CRIMINAL CHARGES BEING FILED AGAINST ME PERSONALLY FOR THESE FIVE YEARS!
As well as consecutive Week 237 for nothing happening in the most recent round of threat of lawsuits against us, since Bob won his suit against Oma Hamou. And, NOTHING happening now for THIRTY THREE WEEKS on the fictional "Bill of Review"...
and NO to fictional character snoopy, I do NOT have to prove Oma has not filed anything. The REALITY is that nobody from law enforcement has ever contacted me or Bob. So IF Oma filed anything, they don't give a crap about it. Thats the reality. And I checked at the District Court and nothing still done with the long dead Bill of Review.
I really love the logic of Oma's debts according to way fat debbie, that it is somehow Bob's fault she ran up bills she couldn't pay. It is exactly as if she went into a restaurant, sat down at a table for two saying her date was coming to meet her. She orders dinner and eats it, but when the bill comes she says "My date stood me up! He was going to pay, not me, so sorry, I'll pay you when I find him and get the money from him" and walks out of the restaurant. NO different.
Dear Rob,
It doesn't upset me at all. Have a party. I'll tell you what does upset me. She is using my name to fake posts. Shame on you, Ms. Hamou! (I'm a poet and I don't know it. But my feet show it. Longfellows!!!)
***collapses in girlish mirth at her own wit***
Seriously, I don't know why I am so surprised. She's faked so many things on her own forum this sort of thing was bound to happen. But it was a terrible try at imitating Mitzi's writing style!
Darlings.
RJ
You mean this post I have saved BFF?
Rebecca Jordan has left a new comment on the post "I Must Still Defend Myself Against Oma Hamou's Cru...":
I mean to say, oy. She now says that a better way to put it would be "arrested withough cause". Nine times, darling? And you did jail time as recently as late in 2008, darling, not twenty years ago.
By the way, I like the picture of you with the bun, so serious, darling, like you're a legitimate businesswoman or something. Nitzana says this is the way you looked when she did the verkackte interview with you that you then rewrote into a fairy tale.
And darling, the letter from the state department? Darling, we have several of them from each time our company opened a new market in the United States. I think one of our was even signed by Henry Kissinger (such a nice man). The fact that some secretary with a stamp pad is sending you love notes? Not so much, darling.
Mitzi
Post a comment.
Unsubscribe to comments on this post.
Posted by Rebecca Jordan to Rob Moshein in my own words at April 19, 2010 3:21 PM
But you don't have to make excuses to ME, BFF, I'm sure there's a perfectly good explaination like Mitzi just stopped in to visit and used your computer. Yeah, yeah, that's it.
Oh Mr. Moshein! Favor to ask you! I am helping the LO auction out and the goal is to make sure there are at least 3 bottles of wine in the table for the clients to use. We don't want 3 buck chuck (2 buck chuck in Cali.) but something under $10 a bottle reds and whites, most likely chard's and zin's and cab's or merlots, to narrow, probably cab and merlot since they go with pretty much everything. What do you recommend? (Sorry, haven't been over to Trader Joe's to get the sangeoviese yet. I might go today I have to go shopping anyway)
Thanks!
I suggest you look at Columbia Crest Winery, decent quality in the under $10 catagory and should be available everywhere. Don't forget to ask for a case discount if you are buying in quantity.
Oh I forgot about them! Cool Beans! Thank you sir!
BFF, I'm so disappointed in you! You know I didn't write that post! But I forgive you. Because that's the kind of big heart I have. You go ahead and believe whatever you want, BFF! As long as it makes sense to you!
And I haven't heard the expression "cool beans" in years! It's darling.
Rebecca
Oh, Miss Jordan. I do so sympathize with you, my dear. To have let a friend use your computer and then have all this confusion erupt!
The cats were my friends. Or so I thought, my dear. When I found out what they were writing about me -- ME, the person who resucued them after Mrs. McConnell / Hamou's arrest, who cleaned their litter, who let them sample my watercress -- why, it was just too much to bear.
Cats and friends ...... Sidling up to you one minute and purring contentedly. And then it all goes saiiiiiling out the door, my dear, the minute a keyboard falls to hand (or paw, rather). Alas and alack, what traitors all.
Oh, get off it, Rebecca. Penelope is just too nice even to hint at it, but we both know what's going on between you and Mitzi.
We've been dealing with the same thing here in Palm Beach with that husband of hers not liking the relationship Penelope and I have. I know people think men find certain relationships between women to be very, er, invigorating, but I can assure you it only applies to sex, not true romance. What blunderbusses men are.
Ah, though, I still remember how it all started, back in the days of watercress sandwiches before all that nastiness about Shady Oaks reared its head. I had dropped by one afternoon to see if Mrs. Autumnvale would like to join the Junior League. She invited me in for a watercress sandwich and, well, one turned into several. Finally, she pushed back from the table and, in that charming slurred accent of hers, said, "Betty (or whatever your name is), lesbie friends." Well, I know code when I hear it, and with that stunning dowager look she has about her, I was simply smitten.
It always took more than one watercress sandwich to bring out what I know is the true Penelope, but what's a little extra watercress consumption when one's heart is on the line, dear?
You and Mitzi should just own up to things, my darling. We're all grownups here.
Oh Good God.
Oh Good God. See what you've stirred up, Oma?
Darlings,
That post is so not the way I sound, darlings. Really, Oma. Too many darlings, darling.
Also, Mrs. Ford (or whoever you are, darling), I think you may not have understood Penny in quite the way she wished to be understood. At I least I hope you did, for her poor husband's sake.
Mitzi
Watercress does not obscure, my dear. It reveals.
You know RJ,
Its pretty hysterical watching hugely fat debbie get so high n mighty sanctimonious about that fictional posting.
Back during the lawsuit that Oma LOST to Bob, Bob used to get these weird, threatening emails from "stranger" daily discussing the lawsuit in detail, and harassing him about it.
Finally, I learned about IP addresses, and took one of these emails from "stan sutherkind" to Bob and traced the source. GUESS where it lead directly to? The Hilton Garden Inn hotel in north Austin, and guess who's room had that specific IP address and who was IN that room?? OMA HAMOU.
Bob reported this to the police, who said they really couldn't do anything because there were no threats of specific violence or bodily harm. BUT, GUESS WHAT ELSE? The MOMENT, yes the VERY SINGLE MOMENT after APD contacted Oma Hamou, the emails from "strangers" stopped. Dead. NOT ONE ever appeared in Bob's email box again.
Coincidence?? I think not....
Oh, and lest snoopy (you know the one who LIED that I had been reported to the police and who LIED that his name IS Justin Edwards and LIED about being in Pushkin in the dark and snow...) accuses me of making it up, here is the proof:
http://omahamoureport.org/OmaAustin.htm
Thanks to the "snoopy" made up character for proving my point again that despite the blustering threats made by Oma Hamou, which he posted in her own name, NOTHING HAS HAPPENED FOR FOUR YEARS NOW. NADA, ZILCH, ZIP, ZERO.
QUESTION: If YOU felt something was so heinous, awful, painful, and causing YOU harm, to the extent that Oma Hamou said in her own words and the words of the fictional characters she uses to slippery like an eel avoid responsibility for writing them, would YOU DO NOTHING WHATSOEVER FOR FOUR YEARS?
I didn't think so.
Judge NOT Oma Hamou's words, rather Judge Oma Hamou's ACTIONS and/or LACK THEREOF.
YAWWWWWNNNNNNNNNN......
"forensic document examiners affiliated with the FBI..."
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaheheheheheheehehhehehehehehohohhohohohohhohohhohohohohhahahahahaahahahahahahaah
Keep on making up shi* Oma. Nobody, and I mean NOBODY actually believes you, NOBODY gives a crap (well except maybe hugely fat debbie who is also a criminal con artist who is aiding and abetting your further crimes....)
Put these "document examiners" into the same file as the MENSA attorneys, and the numbers of law firms Oma has allegedly "hired" over the last five years (you know, the ones that NEVER ACTUALLY DID ANYTHING BECAUSE THEY DIDN'T EXIST). yeah that round file, the one that sits on the floor in the corner, full of the rest of the garbage and crap.
I never ever registered on Facebook as "tanya hoochie" or anyone else other than myself.
I DEMAND YOU SHOW THE PROOF OF THIS STATEMENT, YOU CAN NOT AS IT IS A DELIBERATE AND INTENTIONAL LIE.
Just like the lie that your name is "Justin Edwards" when you have admitted that you are not named that.
Just like the LIE that Oma Hamou filed criminal reports against me over the last five years.
Just like the LIE that "snoopy" was typing away in the dark in a ruined church in a snowstorm in Russia.
Just like the LIE that Oma Hamou is doing anything about suing Bob for anything.
Just like the LIE that Oma Hamou has hired FBI forensic document examiners. Come on...name them....You won't because they don't exist.
Just like all the teams of all the lawyers over the years who were working on the Bill of Review that was filed too late, never served and is a fatally flawed poorly written useless piece of jibberish. PLEASE go ahead Oma and bring that thing before a Judge so I can have the pleasure of watching it be dismissed publicly. We're waiting.
Yes. Oma Hamou's Bill of Review did not comply with Texas Rules regarding Statute of Limitations:
In order to toll the Texas statute of limitations, two requirements must generally be met within the period of limitation: (1) The plaintiff's petition (or complaint) must be filed in the office of the clerk, and (2) a citation, which "shall be accompanied by a copy of plaintiff's petition," must be issued by the clerk and served upon the defendant by an authorized officer. See Liles v. Phillips, 677 S.W.2d 802, 808-09 (Tex.App.--Fort Worth 1984, writ ref'd n.r.e.); Roper v. Jeoffroy Mfg., Inc., 535 S.W.2d 706, 707 (Tex.Civ.App.--Amarillo 1976, writ ref'd n.r.e.).
In order to stop the running of limitations, a plaintiff must not only file the lawsuit within the applicable limitations period, but must also serve the defendants with process within that period. Gant v. DeLeon, 786 S.W.2d 259, 260 (Tex. 1990)
any unexplained extended periods of time in which no attempt at service of process is made constitutes a lack of due diligence as a matter of law. Gant v. DeLeon, 786 S.W.2d at 260; $6453.00, 63 S.W.3d at 536; Holt v. D'Hanis State Bank, 993 S.W.2d 237, 241 (Tex. App.CSan Antonio 1999, no pet.); Rodriguez v. Tinsman & Houser, Inc., 13 S.W.3d 47, 51 (Tex. App.CSan Antonio 1999, pet. denied); Perkins v. Groff, 936 S.W.2d 661, 668 (Tex. App.CDallas 1996, writ denied).
Omele, darling, bubbele,
You can't sue anyone for fraud for the same reason the Atlantic Ocean can't sue anything for being wet.
After all, darling, the internet is littered with the names of people and companies defrauded by Oma Hamou. If you don't believe me, darling readers, go to any search engine, enter her name, and have a party with what pops up.
Still posting, still caring, darling Omele, even though you don't believe in me. But darling, that's alright, because I believe in you.
Shalom!
Mitzi
So angry, Omele! It can't be good for your blood pressure, darling, and then there are the frown lines. Fifty is almost here snd while a few extra pounds will always help keep the wrinkles from being more noticeable, why borrowtrouble, darling? Turn that frown upside down, as Aunt Masada used to say.
No, darling, the sites aren't all put up by your imaginary enemies. Some of them are maintained by law enforcement, legal agencies, things like that, darling. Unless you are claiming that Mr. Atchison controls the California and Texas legal systems, which makes him something like the Wizard of Oz, darling. Sinced you live in California, I guess that makes you the Wicked Witch of the West? Omele, darling, if you have any flying monkeys, now would be the time to haul them out.
And stop saying I don't give a rat's tuchis about you, darling. Does your mother know about the potty mouth on you, Oma Louise?
I do care.
Mitzi
So I guess "Snoopy's" secret is out. The new script h/she has been working on is entitled Criminal Minds: West Virginia. It's the story of a plucky little gal from you-know-where and her interaction with criminal profilers! She has a sidekick named "Debbie", and there are overtones of "The Ghost Whisperers" because she also talks to a lot of imaginary people whom only she can see. They were going to call it something else, but Jake and the Fat Man has already been used! I think they are talking about that darling Ru Paul for the Oma-esque role, and partnering him/her (see why it will work, "Snoopy"?) with John Goodman in a long wig.
I smell a hit!
Nitz and I are still up here in Alameda. We're thinking of taking a break for a trip through watercress country.
Bitsy
As legitimate forensic document examiners, we must protest the claim that we are in any way affiliated with the F.B.I. in our work for Ms. Hamou. We believe she got confused by that newspaper article we questioned her about that was entitled "Fake Businesswoman Indicted". We were not affiliated with the article. We simply read it, as apparently did some others.
So when Hamou said she was using forensic document examiners affiliated with the F.B.I., she really meant they were affiliated with the Fake Businesswoman who was Indicted?
That's creepy.
Well, we are not able to say what she meant. That would best be left to the Forensic Behavior Profilers she engaged.
We're hearing their work has taken an unanticipated -- and interesting -- turn.
Perhaps you'll hear from them later.
Bitsy, sister of my heart!
Be careful with the watercress, you know how Nitzi gets.
Also, Omele, seriously, darling, you can say what you want to about me, but honestly, darling, celebrating Easter? I don't think so, bubbele.
Meanwhile, darling, your latest post is hysterical! (I assume you were aiming for the yucks, because, darling, you certainly got them! Like Milton Berle you are!). All of the judgments and arrest records that are online, these are simply things that pop up because of darling Rob Moshein and the Wizard of Oz? Really? Because maybe things are different over there, but here your arrest record only pops up if you are arrested. So if it rains, do you shake your fist at the sky and claim that Bob Atchison is showering hatred in liquid form on your head?
Also, herzilein, enough with the constant refrain of "I fell pretty". You look alright for your age, and the additional poundage doesn't carry all that bad, especially if you keep standing near the other one, if you know what I mean, and I think you do, but honestly, Omele, the pretty boat sailed a long time ago. Also, you are approaching fifty, and darling, there is no shame in that. But if you insist, how about this? If you deduct the time you have spent in jail, you're probably really something like thirty-seven. See?
Lots of love,
Mitzi
Don't look at us to figure out what she meant.
She told us she had this big case in the works with the feds and several local police jurisdictions involved and that it was all being coordinated by a big firm of "Mensa lawyers".
We thought it odd that a client would contact us directly, since we are almost always engaged by the law firm or the police in such matters. And we've never heard of "Mensa lawyers".
But, hey. Who can resist a Russian history mystery involving psychopathic homosexual stalkers, midnight flights in and out of Texas, telepathic signals from deceased royals, people accidentally suing themselves, a cabal of Scientologists with a bent for B&D, castrated cats, drunken dowagers, and an enormously fat woman who thinks herself "attractive"?
So we took the case.
But .... eyyyyiiiieeeee. The way she perceives what's going on around her and her role in it. We have never seen this much dissociative behavior and perception outside a mental institution. And her fantasies about what she thinks it all means. Ach-ee-wa-wa.
Hell. Stay on this ride too long and maybe the fat woman is attractive.
No matter, though. She wrote us a big, fat check for our work, and we'll be laughing all the way to the bank.
Since the snoopy fictional character says I take issues of law out of context, allow me to quote verbatim from the sources:
Liles v. Phillips, 677 SW 2d 802 - Tex: Court of Appeals, Fort Worth 1984
"It is well-settled that the mere filing of a suit will not interrupt or toll the running of a statute of limitations; to interrupt the statute, the use of diligence in procuring the issuance and service of citation is required. Rigo Manufacturing Company v. Thomas, 458 S.W.2d 180, 182 (Tex.1970). "
see: http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=5130710037999325891&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
Rigo Manufacturing Company v. Thomas, 458 S.W.2d 180, 182 (Tex.1970).
"This court long ago established the rule that the mere filing of a suit will not interrupt or toll the running of a statute of limitation; that to interrupt the statute, the use of diligence in procuring the issuance and service of citation is required. See Ricker v. Shoemaker, 81 Tex. 22, 16 S.W. 645 (1891); City of Gainesville v. Harder, 139 Tex. 155, 162 S.W.2d 93 (1942).
...
by refusal of writ of error in Buie v. Couch, 126 S.W.2d 565 (Tex.Civ.App., Waco, 1939), we approved a holding in a suit on a note that eight and one-third months delay in securing issuance and service of citation was negligence as a matter of law and inconsistent with due diligence."
see:
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=7483637928386654712&hl=en&as_sdt=10000000000002&as_vis=1
Dear Forensic Boys,
I would get to the bank as fast as possible. Just saying.
Rebecca
That Snoopy. Gotta hand it to him for the effort.
He refers to the online court reporting sites of California and other states as listing the "alleged" judgments against and convictions of Oma Hamou. Right. States publicly report the "alleged" outcomes of their judicial proceedings.
And he refers to Mitzi's "claim" that Hamou is pushing 50. Hamou was born on August 1, 1963. Arithmetic is arithmetic. Even in West Virginia.
Vintage Hamou. When all other argument fails, just assert that black is white and proceed.
Two small things. Big F**ing deal I said Facebook instead of classmates. I never registered ANYWHERE on ANY social networking site under ANY NAME other than my own. You still haven't proven I registered using the name tanya hoochie on ANY WEBSITE. My demand still stands.
The second is the continued insisting that Oma Hamou is so above the law, this time with the "Just because the judgment is in her name doesn't mean the debt is hers...." Its exactly the same thing as I said before. Oma Hamou walks into a restaurant, sits at a table for two. Tell the waiter she is waiting for her date, who is taking her to dinner. She says he's late and orders her meal without the date. She finishes eating, the bill comes and she says "No, I don't owe the money. My date was paying for dinner. It's HIS debt, not mine..."
Yeah, right.
Damn it.
We just got a call from our bank. They said the check we deposited yesterday bounced.
We told them there must be a mistake, as this client was referred to us by the Forensic Document Examiners affiliated with the F.B.I. and had to be legitimate.
The woman at the bank started giggling and said, "oh, is that the name she's using now? Seems it's a new one every month or two."
Well, the Forensic Document Examiners affiliated with the F.B.I. are going to hear from us, let me tell you.
Let us introduce a tad more REALITY into the psychotic world of Oma Hamou and her alter ego "snoopy".
Black's Law Dictionary:
A judgment debtor is the person against who a judgment has been entered which remains unsatisfied
Therefore: IF Oma Hamou is NAMED IN THE JUDGMENT ITSELF SHE IS THE JUDGMENT DEBTOR AND THE DEBT IS HERS.
Period. This is the law in all fifty states and the Federal System.
No matter how many times "team hamou" says "Well, just because Oma's name is on the judgment doesn't mean SHE owes the money" IS A DELIBERATE FALSE STATEMENT.
You know, just like every time "snoopy" identified himself as "Justin Edwards" THIS WAS ALSO A DELIBERATE FALSE STATEMENT.
You know, just like every time "team hamou" insisted Oma Hamou had filed a police report against me THIS WAS A DELIBERATE FALSE STATEMENT INTENDED ONLY TO HARASS, DEFAME AND INTIMIDATE ME.
yeah, Oma Hamou and her friends are the paragon of truth. Right. and Adolph Hitler was just a well intentioned nice guy....
I gotta tell ya Forensic, that's a cute story. I used to work for Wells Fargo and I can tell you that no teller can give that sort of information out to you. If they do, they get severely reprimanded and written up. Nobody is going to risk their job for that. But hey! Let's just keep playing the game here, I'm game! HA!
Well well well well well.
Lookie lookie what I just got sent. Seems Old Oma Hamou has yet another default judgment against her, as does her CO DEFENDAANT Jim Sproul, the old valley pervert....Check it:
Case Summary
Case Number: MC020860
HAMID REFAI VS ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL, ET AL
Filing Date: 09/23/2009 Case Type: Othr Breach Contr/Warr-not Fraud (General Jurisdiction) Status: Pending
Future Hearings
10/27/2010 at 08:30 am in department ATV10 at 42011 4th Street West, Lancaster, CA 93534 Conference-Case Management
Documents Filed | Proceeding Information
Parties
MCCONNELL ALEXANDRA - Defendant
REFAI HAMID - Plaintiff
SPROUL JIM - Defendant
WARD THOMAS J. ESQ. - Attorney for Plaintiff
Case Information | Party Information | Proceeding Information
Documents Filed (Filing dates listed in descending order)
11/19/2009 Default Entered (JIM SPROUL ) Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff
11/03/2009 Default Entered (ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL ) Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff
10/22/2009 Rtn of Service of Summons & Compl (AS TO JIM SPROUL ) Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff
10/09/2009 Rtn of Service of Summons & Compl Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff
09/23/2009 Summons Filed
09/23/2009 Complaint Filed
09/23/2009 Notice (OF ASSIGNMENT ) Filed by Clerk
09/23/2009 Summons Issued
09/23/2009 Notice-Case Management Conference (01/27/10 830AM DEPT A10 ) Filed by Clerk
Seems "Alexandra McConnell" had some rent problems on yet ANOTHER house, this one on 43rd Street East in Palmdale.
She and her cosigner on the lease, one Jim Sproul, sorta kinda failed to pay up rent due under the lease.
Wow, go figure. Oma Hamou aka Alexandra McConnell having rent issues?? nahhhhhhhhhh
Good Lord. Not another judgment against her to dissect?
Oh, well. It's nasty work, but I guess somebody's gotta do it.
Shoulder to the harness. Nose to the grindstone.
I wonder how long it's going to be before "Alexandra McConnell" has as many judgments against her as "Oma Hamou". I wonder how many she needs to rack up before she's off in search of yet another name to befoul.
Hand to the plow. Thumb to the treadle. Pen to the checkbook .......
Hey, Russophile. I can assure you that what we reported the lady at the bank said is EVERY SINGLE BIT as true as the fact that Hamou hired us and the Forensic Document Examiners Affiliated With The F.B.I. to build yet another powerful legal case that's about to break over the heads of Atchison and Moshein.
Every bit as true. Yep.
Am I the only one who noticed that despite all the vehement blustering from Oma Hamou's fictional characters and the hugely fat debbie, that NOBODY denied the fact that this is a legitimate default judgment against "Alexandra McConnell"??
We know she had notice as proof of service was returned to the Court. So, why didn't she bother to show up?? hmmmmmm?????
Oh wait, thats right. She never DOES show up to Court, except that one time where she lost to Bob.
Two corrections, Mr. Moshein:
It is just an "alleged" default judgment. You see, there are no actual judgments against her anyplace. She will swear to it.
And she does show up for trial when she's been slapped in the slammer and put under bail, as she was in San Bernardino over that other recent bounced rent check.
Isn't it interesting, though, how everything Tina Vanveen said about her sooner or later turns out to be true, such as when Vanveen said that Sproul had quit giving her money.
The dumb bastard now joins the long list of people who, by associating with Hamou, get themselves entangled in the court system. To know her is to be served along with her.
See? I told you all, and now Omele herself agrees with me, the darling. When something goes wrong, it's a case of identity theft! That's what it is! Identity theft!
Darling, I feel your pain, and now I care more than ever.
Mitzi
Mitzi
I meant thumb to the treadle. Illuminati does my spinning and weaving.
I'm treadling as fast as I can, Master Blake! I don't mind! You're a much better boss than that old Grand Shovel and his snippy little minion Daryn!
Treadle. Treadle. Treadle. Treadle. Treadle. Treadle. Treadle. Treadle. Treadle. Treadle. Treadle.
Your loyal minion,
Illuminati
So Jim Sproul co-signed a lease with someone who stole Hamou's identity?
I know he's been wanting to tap her good stuff, but just how senile is he?
Hell Sproul twarnt no prevert just a sad old man who wanted a little somethinsomethin. sorry abnout the damm lawsuit jim its why momma and me wont cosine nothin no more.
I'm sure it is FBP. *wink,wink, nudge, nudge, she-said-knowingly*
Darlings,
I know you'll all be relieved to know that I have been contacted by Mossad in regard to my case of identity theft, when someone tried to impersonate me by posting it under the wrong name? So personally I have to tell you that I am not quite sure it ever happened, because a post on Oma's site isn't what I would ever call evidence,if you know what I mean, and I think you do, but Mossad is taking it very seriously, darlings, and they assure me that it probably happened because Oma has been posting all of those nasty things about me that it inspired someone to steal my identity. Because that happens all of the time. They told me that I can expect a lot of fake traffic tickets and probably some fake judgments against me because honestly, how are the courts to know that it isn't really me, it's some psychopath inspired by the imaginary people over there.
Mossad is a little busy, what with those verkackte Iranians developing an atomic bomb, and Hamas and all, but they are prepared to drop everything and get on this case, darlings.
I knew you would all be relieved. I certainly am.
Mitzele
What would be the point of Jim Sproul's co-signing a lease with Hamou if he, too, either had no capacity or no intent to pay up if she defaulted?
Oh, yeah. Paying debts is not what those two worry about. It's just about getting what you want today and then not being home when the law comes knocking.
It's called living on the grift.
And Mitzi. Glad you got the Mossad interested in your case. Play your cards with them like Hamou does with Homeland Security, and I bet you could get them to make you flapjacks in the morning.
Blakele, I'm not saying that I couldn't get the flapjacks made back in the day, darling. I was the Toast of Flatbush Avenue. But I'm a woman of a certain age, and the griddle is closed for business. But thanks for thinking that I've still got it! Very Sproul of you!
Mitzi
ahh, cool. the "snoopy" one lies again, trying to convince people that "lots of people" are involved with them. Just recently it wrote:
"Now, I'm not the only one who received a copy of this post Michelle/Russophile also received a copy of this so did lots of other good people"
Actually, Google makes tracking these things most simple. There are only two possible ways that anyone gets an automatic update on the comments. One is to register with google and get the RSS feed. There is only one person who does that, "Nicolei Romanoffski" or anyone who registers and POSTS a comment here. The only one I know who would send copies would be Biernat, who admits she does. I know who the other posters are, Rebecca, Mitz, Blake, etc...
Therefore, there are at most TWO people who get the updated comments automatically aside from me and the rest. NOT the "lots of other people" the snoopy compulsive liar wants you to believe...
I swear, Illuminati. You really are a whiny little critter, aren't you?
The Grand Shovel (yes ... I called him for a reference before hiring you) warned me that your paranoid obsessession about that minion Daryn could get in the way of things. He even offered to send over a spare pair of manacles if I wanted.
I told him to hold off for now. I still hope we can work well together. But get over Daryn, for Chrissakes, will you?
Knit one, purl two. You're getting sleepy.
Knit one, purl two. You're getting sleepy.
Knit one, purl ......
Hi ho, compatriots. Dromer here, hailing from Oxford where I am soon to take my degree in economic philosophy.
While I quite appreciate your difficulty in comprehending my mother's involved financial affairs, let me at least assure you that not everyone from that family is as bumptious as my uncles Omer, Gomer, and Homer or my aunts Gilda, Hilda, and Dilda.
Granted, my experience with the McConnell clan did reduce the cultural adjustment I had to make to British dentitian, but they are nevertheless a fine clan (the maternal link regrettably excepted).
Be that as it may, my mother assures me she is getting her finances in order and will have to make no more quick moves in the near future. Uncle James will see to that once, of course, he clears up that unfortunate misunderstanding by which a court erroneously issued a default judgment against him along with my mother. It appears he accidentally picked up one of the checkbooks for a closed account that my mother keeps on hand when circumstances call for one of her check-writing "accidents".
The poor man. He's been so kind to us all, and really wants to be kinder still to my mother, if only she would let him.
So very regrettable that he got drawn into this affair.
Cheerio for now,
Dromer O. McConnell
On the "Ask Oma" forum Snoopy posted that,
"It is widely believed Rebecca Jordan is Bob Atchison ...."
Well, just because Big Debbie believes something doesn't make it true.
Handmaiden posted on "Ask Oma",
"Widely believed means that is believed by many people, not a single person."
Or believed by one very wide person.
Either way, "she" also posted that it is fortunate that this site is believed by "very few people". So which is it? Either this site is the ne plus ultra of evil and seducing thousands into believing the worst of Oma Hamou, something that the lady herself seems quite capable of accomplishing on her own, or very few people believe it. I suppose this is why she has such trouble with the FBI, the Mensa lawyers and the law enforcement agencies with whom she deals as a potential victim as opposed to when she herself faces criminal charges. They can't quite believe her.
Let me know what Mossad turns up, Mitzi. I am pretty sure I was hacked and I am pretty sure I know who did it! Yesterday I was followed down 57th Street by several shady looking characters who were all muttering about how I deserved what would happen to me "because of what I thought of O.H." I myself am going to call the Office for Homeland Security.
Rebecca
BFF, are you sure it wasn't "The Minions"?? You know they are rather unhinge--um, off their meds. Yeah, yeah, that's it. I worry about Blake hanging around with that crowd. . . .
No, BFF, it wasn't the minions. At least, I think they weren't. It was the weirdest thing. It was almost as though they weren't really there, if you can believe that. But I could hear their voices. It was almost as though they were in my head.
Funny you should post! I had carbonara for lunch and thought of you! Hope all is well!
Rebecca
I am well aware of those kinds of "feelings" where "something" is there, you KNOW it's there though it doesn't quite materialize but still makes you feel funny because something is WRONG. So be careful!
Pancetta or bacon BFF?? You know the De Cecco noodles are the BEST!
Things are good! Thanks for asking. #2 son finally made it back to base after the iceland volcano delay. Though I don't think he's going to make the family Alaskan cruise. I will see him finally in late May. #1 son will make the cruise. Life is good.
I say. Has anyone seen my cricket bat?
I told Debbie it was not a dining utensil, but given the difficulty Mum has had keeping pitchforks on hand in the stable lately, one never knows.
Cheerio. And do please let me know about the bat should you chance across it. The cricket bat, if you will.
Dromer O. McConnell
O Mighty Blake!
I will stop mentioning Daryn . . .I will stop mentioning Daryn . . . I will stop mentioning Daryn . . .I am getting sleepy . . . I will stop mentioning Daryn . . .I see large jaws . . .I will stop mentioning Daryn . . .
Illuminati
So we are to understand that she actually does have relatives named Gomer, Omer, Homer and Dromer? I'm impressed. They didn't seem like probable names, but she is claiming them as family.
So when your identity was stolen to rent the house on 43rd Street, did they just knock off Sproul's identity as well? Or is he so used to co-signing for you that he didn't verify that it was actually you. Or is the record (available through internet search) a vile lie posted by California?
Did a court ever find your ex-husband guilty of abuse? Or is this simply something you threw at him during an acrimonious divorce, and later recanted?
You seem to think that a legal judgment is some kind of moving target, i.e. you are only bound to pay up after a complicated "catch me if you can" scenario. I'm not surprised, since it is your mode of dealing with all debts, but at the same time it isn't going to be all that impressive an argument in court. Should this ever reach court. Which it won't.
Oma, Oma, Oma. The only reason you're upset is that you have been called on your, you should excuse the expression, shit. And you don't like it. The internet is your private playground to hurl abuse and invective at people. The internet is your personal space to libel people and use derogatory language ("Faggot" Rob indeed).
Get a grip, Ms. Hamou. And Rob and Bob, if there is a return address on her letter, sue her country ass. My bet is there won't be one.
Rebecca
Darling Rivka,
Why is it so hard to believe in Gomer, Homer and that darling Dromer? Two heads, and a wonderful speaker out of both of them I'm sure, how proud his mother must be of him!
Mitzi, sister of Nitzi, Bitsy, Fritzi and of course our little problem, Ditzi.
Oh, Ms. Hamou, Ms. Hamou, Ms. Hamou. I would ask how stupid you are, but there's really no point, is there?
Has it never occurred to you that if you ever dared get into a legal wrangle over your rather strange views of defamation that you would be held to account for your claims that Atchison and Moshein have been under investigation by federal and local police authorities; that they were on the verge of being arrested, prosecuted, and/or sued on numerous occasions over the past several years; that you were going to file a timely Bill of Review against Atchison (which includes securing service of process); that you have retained the services of "forensic document examiners affiliated with the F.B.I." to document their frauds and lies; and that Bob Atchison is a document forger and perjurer (despite a jury having already looked at that claim and found against you)?
It's too bad that you feel put upon by their attempts to defend themselves against your ludicrous accusations over the years and the websites you keep creating to defame them (such as your Austin Wine Guy blog that inspired this highly amusing blog). But it's really not their fault that your attempts inevitably blow your shit right back on you. You have left a string of felony convictions, forgery arrests, outstanding warrants, bad checks, and adverse civil judgments -- all matters of public record -- in your own wake.
Sorry they embarrass you. But you made your own filthy bed, my dear.
God, how many pseudo-legal documents has that bimbo flooded onto the internet over the years?
Of course, she still hasn't topped the time a few months back she actually tried to file some hare-brained document with a court clerk and accidentally sued herself in the process.
Gotta say one thing for her, though. She's always good for a laugh.
My, my. I think someone is a little angry. And by someone I mean you, Ms. Hamou. Good God, dear, Moshein provides the case number and location of the latest lawsuit. And you're saying it's untrue?
And I simply don't believe that the post you put up under my name on your site was mine. I didn't sign it, Mitzi did. And she says she didn't write it, so what's the only solution? Identity theft. We know that you are posting as "Snoopy" and pretending to be poor Justin, Ms. Hamou. So who is the most likely suspect in the "Rebecca Jordan" post? I think we all know.
You also seem confused about Father Markell, Ms. Hamou. My friend Irina in Pushkin has assured me that the priest is well aware of the damage you tried to cause him. I was curious as to how many people even remember you at the restoration, and surprised to learn that quite a few do. They flinch and drop small irreplaceable objets d'art at the mention of your name.
I have read the documents you posted about the Demian divorce (you threw coffee on him?) and I have to ask, didn't you recant your charges of child abuse? Weren't the children ultimately returned to his custody? I couldn't care less about Marcus Demian, of whom I had never heard before all of this nonsense, but it does seem to fall into a recognized pattern of vindictiveness toward people who win against you in court.
But it is good to know that there will be a return address on the envelope. Will it be an actual street address of just another post office box?
Unlike Mitzi, I don't post because I care. I post because it entertains me, until the occasion when the sheer level of drivel spewed over there annoys me. I am currently mildly annoyed. Can you tell?
And while I understand the level of venom "Debbie" is directing at Rob, I have never impugned you because of your weight, dear "Debbie". So a bit less about what a miserable person I am, "Debbie" or I will be forced to go after that outfit you wore to Oma's hearing, girlfriend.
xoxoxo
RJ
I think what I like best about you, Oma, is your utter, utter predictability.
The document Rob cited does not say what we think it says? What exactly does it say, then?
There is a freaking case number, dear.
And meanwhile, "Debbie" do you really want to use an image of rolling on the floor laughing your ass off? Really?
RJ
Yet another amateurish "cease and desist" letter sent from a remailing center mailbox in the Valley.
Yawn.
She really gives that old mailbox a workout, but I guess it's a necessary tool for someone with a constant need to duck process servers.
Given the steps she takes not to leave any tracks, it's astonishing that she's had so many judgments issued against her and her "friends". I guess Morton, Sproul, and others she has ensnared in her legal woes just weren't as good at hide-and-seek -- or as practiced.
Post a Comment