As law enforcement seems unable to assist me, and the person behind this campaign to defame me and interfere with my business and profession, named variously Oma Hamou, Oma Mcconnell or Alexandra McConnell is what they call "judgment proof" meaning she has no money, I must place this blog here. She recently filed Bankruptcy, swearing under oath that her only income is $2500 a month from her friend Jim Sproul's company "Reseda Screen & Glass", that she lives in rental houses in the Antelope Valley and in July she was evicted for non payment of rent from a house in Palmdale, and she has over $500,000 in outstanding debts.
I would NOT even have written here, had this person not continually written her own false and defamatory statements herself and aided and abetted other personae writing "on her behalf" for the last three years. If she doesn't want me to say anything about her, she ought not have been continually blogging and writing about me much less aiding and encouraging others to do so as well.
The woman behind all of this goes by many names: Oma Hamou, Oma McConnell, Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Hamou, Oma Demian, Alexandra Murphy, are the usual ones, but there are others. The reason this woman and her "alleged" friends crusade to destroy me is simple. I learned about her genuine background, and she wants me silenced from speaking about it.
This woman admits that her actions are all motivated by her bitterness and hatred towards me, and this is the reason for her actions.
This woman, Oma Hamou, Oma McConnell, Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Hamou, Oma Demian, Alexandra Murphy and her other aliases have a twenty year track record of FELONY CONVICTIONS, multiple arrests, failure to abide by the requirements of her probation for her felony convictions which lead to more arrests, many many civil judgments against her for hundreds of thousands of dollars, a history of writing bad checks, and currently she was arrested late in 2008 in San Bernardino California on a Felony Charge of Forgery of a Financial Instrument (she seems to have forged a large check) After 14 months of dragging the process out, she paid the Victim full restitution and the District Attorney dropped the Felony charge. She has a history of evictions and bad checks.
This woman also has a recent default Judgment against her in Los Angeles County, in the amount of $55,000:
Case Number: MC020860 HAMID REFAI VS ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL, JIM SPROUL, ET AL
Filing Date: 09/23/2009
According to the case, Mr. Refai, a married man, was "involved" with Alexandra McConnell, she kept telling him about serious "medical problems" and asking for "loans" for medical bills in the total amount of $51,000. This was confirmed by the fact that a woman who used to live in her house wrote on the internet THREE MONTHS before the suit was filed: "I lived with this lady, she is no good. SHE LIES. SHE HAS LIKE 50 CATS LIVING WITH HER AND HER HOUSE SMELLS LIKE SHIT AND CAT SPRAY AND PISS. She is dirty, filthy and uses old men for money I SEEN IT MYSELF. By the way Hamid's wife knows it was LIPOSUCTION you drained their bank account for, not cancer in your asshole. He had her sign a promissory note, co signed by long time co-conspirator Jim Sproul. She of course never PAID back the money. She, of course, never showed up in Court.
Here is the Final Judgment against Alexandra McConnell aka Oma Hamou and her "longtime friend" Jim Sproul:
This woman has been EVICTED TWICE IN THE LAST TWO YEARS FOR FAILURE TO PAY RENT AND GIVING THE LANDLORD BACK CHECKS.
Someone else has recently posted a precis of the criminal and debt history of this woman. You can go here to read the specific details for yourself:
http://www.omahamoureality.blogspot.com
While Oma Hamou aka Alexandra McConnell claims to be a "Motion Picture Executive" her online anonymous "friends" admit she works as a Paralegal in the Palmdale area. She has no background experience as a "Producer".
She is nearly psychotic in her daily compulsion because I stumbled onto these actual facts of her past, and present, which do not coincide with the personae she wants to project to others.
This woman, Oma Hamou, Oma McConnell, Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Hamou, Oma Demian, Alexandra Murphy et al, has for YEARS now, threatened me with civil and criminal actions. For years now, NOTHING has happened except more ongoing threats online. NOW HER OWN WEBSITE ON FEBRUARY 28, 2010 CONFIRMS AND ADMITS SHE AND HER "FRIENDS" DELIBERATELY LIED EVERY SINGLE TIME THEY SAID OMA HAMOU HAD FILED A CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST ME AND THEY WERE LYING EVERY SINGLE TIME THEY SAID I WAS UNDER POLICE INVESTIGATION, SINCE THE POLICE WILL INVESTIGATE NOTHING UNLESS A FORMAL COMPLAINT IS FILED. HER ONLINE ALLEGED 'FRIENDS' NOW CLAIM THEY HAVE LIED FOR YEARS ABOUT THEIR IDENTITIES.
I am called a "criminal stalker". First, being called a criminal is Libel per se in Texas, since I have never been convicted of ANYTHING worse than one speeding ticket. As for a stalker, well, I have no clue where this woman is, where she lives, and frankly I don't WANT to know, nor can I care less. In the words of one of her attorney's, Dave. S. "the faster that woman is in my rearview mirror the happier I'll be" (yeah I have the email he said that to me in.). I WISH NO CONTACT WITH OR FROM THIS PERSON.
I do NOT wish this person ill, or harm. Frankly, I do not care about her. The less I hear about her, the better. That said, no one should ever be subjected to harm or danger. I DO NOT WISH THIS PERSON HARM, nor have I advocated, wished, nor advised anyone to harm her. Such allegations are baseless, wrong and defamatory. I just want he to leave me and my partner ALONE and stop the thousands of pages of defamatory lies she puts up and allows "friends" to post on her website in order to cause me harm.
This woman, Oma Hamou, Oma McConnell, Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Hamou, Oma Demian, Alexandra Murphy has demonstrated she has no credibility. You can read in previous posts where she has outright lied, most notably when she filed a report about her business with Dunn and Bradstreet that was investigated by them and shown to be completely fraudulent.
Ask yourself if the following make any, rational or reasonable common sense:
This woman claims to be an actress and model, but for a decade steadfastly REFUSES to provide one single shred of evidence to support the allegation, not even a credit, reference or magazine issue. She says only "I was and I don't have to prove it. YOU have to prove I wasn't". Does that make sense?
This woman claims that her three felony convictions were not Her fault, but rather someone else's fault. Does THAT make sense?
This woman claims that her recent Felony Forgery Charges in San Bernardino are "just a big mistake" and "law enforcement and the DA" are on "her side" and "believe her", yet they STILL pressed charges and scheduling dozens of hearings over FOURTEEN MONTHS. Does THAT make sense??
This woman has claimed for six years non stop that I am being investigated by law enforcement and the FBI. Yet, NOTHING ever happened, I have never been contacted by law enforcement for any reason in those six years other than one speeding ticket. Does it make any sense to you that law enforcement is doing ANYTHING for six years now?
Buddha said Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense.
Look at all the blathering posts she has put up on the internet, and ask yourself, do these things agree with YOUR reason and your own common sense? The answer is obvious.
As you can see, this woman and/or her cronies now LIE, falsify documents and use years old private letters to attempt to defame and disparage me, and Bob Atchison
Many people whom have come into contact with her call her a con artist and scam artist. She hangs out with convicted felons, even inviting these career criminals to live in her house with her.
You can verify all the arrests, judgments, evictions, etc for yourself with simple online searches.
You are free to email me with your questions, Rob@AustinWineGuy.com, and if you yourself have been a VICTIM of this woman Oma Hamou, Oma McConnell, Alexandra McConnell, Alexandra Hamou, Oma Demian, Alexandra Murphy, I encourage you to contact me.
232 comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 201 – 232 of 232OOPSIE! Oma can't even read what she posts or remember twenty minutes later what she wrote:
by Snoopy on Thu Nov 04, 2010 1:06 pm
Now, I know Oma is now not at the FBI office in Westwood but is at the hospital and this too is a fact you can't prove isn't, all you can do at best is lie.
then now??
Postby Snoopy on Thu Nov 04, 2010 1:40 pm
No one on this forum said Oma spent the night at the hospital only that yesterday she was at the hospital and today which is a new day, she went to the FBI office on Wilshire Boulevard in Westwood.
BUSTED.
oh, and "snoopy" on the chance Oma Hamou really WAS being questioned by the FBI, I have NO DOUBT she would try to blame Eric Cowan. That's her M.O. BLAME THE VICTIM.
Still hoping to hear from his Girlfriend by the way.
Come and meet those dancing feet,
On the avenue I'm taking you to...
Come and meet those dancing feet,
On the avenue I'm taking you to,
Forty-Second Street.
Hear the beat of dancing feet,
It's the song I love the melody of,
Forty-Second Street.
Can't wait for the tapdancing to resume
Oma can't even read what she posts or remember twenty minutes later what she wrote:
by Snoopy on Thu Nov 04, 2010 1:06 pm
Now, I know Oma is now not at the FBI office in Westwood but is at the hospital and this too is a fact you can't prove isn't, all you can do at best is lie.
then now??
Postby Snoopy on Thu Nov 04, 2010 1:40 pm
No one on this forum said Oma spent the night at the hospital only that yesterday she was at the hospital and today which is a new day, she went to the FBI office on Wilshire Boulevard in Westwood.
Which one is it??
BUSTED.
OH, and Oma Hamou, you STILL won't answer the question, yes or no...
Feb. 24, 2006:
http://omahamoureport.org/HamouToTriana.html
YOU WROTE A JUDGE THAT YOU HAD SWORN OUT A CRIMINAL COMPLAINT WITH THE FBI AGAINST BOB. WAS THIS TRUE? OR DID YOU LIE??
WHY DON'T YOU ACTUALLY ANSWER THIS?
As usual, when I finally get around to looking closely at some of the reams of crap Sandman-who-is-Oma posts, I find that she is completely distorting the meaning or even the actual contents of the document.
Hamou keeps harping on and on that Atchison and his attorney committed perjury in telling a judge about earlier lawsuits.
To "prove" this charge, she posted:
"According to the State of Texas other than the then present lawsuit case No. GN303141 between Atchison and Hamou no other lawsuit existed between the two."
However, she also produces a transcript -- WHICH DOES NOT SUPPORT WHAT SHE CLAIMS.
Here's what the transcript shows Atchison's lawyer actually said:
"The prior lawsuit here in Texas was settled, and that had to do with Mr. Atchison’s former business partner and the web design company that they own together."
Neither Atchison nor his lawyer made any claim that there was another Texas lawsuit between Hamou and Atchison. What the lawyer said was that there was a lawsuit between Hamou and Atchison's FORMER BUSINESS PARTNER.
And there was.
Neither Atchison nor his lawyer lied to the judge, and the documents that Hamou herself posts actually prove it.
As usual, the person lying here is Oma Hamou.
She's a lying bitch. Always has been.
I've been sitting here trying to figure out why Hamou would make a claim and then herself post the evidence that disproves her own claim.
It must be the con artist's sociopathic tendency to believe they can convince other people of what he or she needs them to believe instead of what actually is.
Of course, once the real information is revealed, the con artist is exposed for what he or she is. At least to all but the abysmally stupid.
Dear Blake,
I have told you several times that you should actually try and plough through the welter of "information" that she posts, since it always yields this kind of thing. Always. I have not seen one document that she has posted that actually proved anything that she said it did. I know it's easy to glaze out as she posts and reposts the same stuff over and over, but it is clear that she does this because she does not actually understand what the documents say.
On the other hand, if all of this nonsense is being handled by "Snoopy" and "Sandman", but especially the illiterate "Snoopy", and not Oma Hamou herself, then she needs to intervene and stop it, regroup, hire a lawyer, and let him or her handle posting documents on the internet. Of course, any lawyer worth the fee if going to tell Our Lady of Larceny to stop posting immediately, but at least with a lawyer to advise what documents do and do not mean (the classic example being Triana's TRO), she might have a fighting chance looking less like a public idiot. She might also ask "Snoopy" to stop putting pictures of her in her underwear out on the internet as an attempt to bolster her credibility, in much the same way that a lawyer will advise a client to dress appropriately for a court date. Of course, we've seen the evidence that she doesn't know how to do that, either.
And Oma, if you are reading this (and if not, please tell her about it, "Snoppy"), I am not talking about the unsupported claims that you are at the hospital or the F.B.I. building. I can't speak to the hospital, but I know for certain that you were not at any F.B.I. office in the Greater Los Angeles area yesterday. There is no investigation, girlfriend. Do grasp that we know this for a fact. I emphasize this because if in fact you are playing to an audience of Oma Hamou sympathizers --- the thousands of people who google your name --- it is eventually going to be put up or shut up time. And I remember what happened the last time you felt goaded to take action after years of threats. You sued yourself.
The shelf life on the "F.B.I. investigation" has long since expired, and eventually it will dawn upon even my BFF that you are making that one up. In the meantime, you are making a fool of yourself. And frankly, you're not doing the image of the F.B.I. much good. You now have them investigating "false insurance claims". What's next for our intrepid agents? Arresting jaywalkers?
Rebecca Jordan
Blake are you REALLY just now noticing this?
I mean, Oma Hamou plays that lying game 24/7/365
Posts on her website a SPECIFIC ADDRESS in Pushkin, Russia as her "RUSSIAN OFFICES". So, I write the Real Estate Management Company IN CHARGE of the place. They confirm NOBODY has offices in the building, and the building doesn't have a roof, floors or windows!!!
She writes "After almost a year of hard work I received a letter of support from the US State Department"...Well I personally called the woman who SIGNED the letter. She confirmed it wasn't "in recognition" of her work, it was IN RESPONSE to a letter Oma Hamou WROTE TO THE STATE DEPT. It was a routine, "thank you for writing, good luck with your project" FORM LETTER. The letter Oma wrote THEM was all about her getting her arm broken during a mugging in Russia while working on her "movie"...
THEN Oma called the woman literally twenty times, driving her nuts, until the woman just had to stop taking calls about her...
I mean, she's been saying she's an "actress" publicly for a DECADE, yet can't even come up with ONE shred of proof of this claim...
I think, perhaps, Oma Hamou's sociopathic disorder is so severe that there IS one person who believes her lies, Oma Hamou herself...
I'm not surprised to hear she compulsively called the lady at the State Department over and over.
Eric Cowan says the Palmdale Sheriff also got a string of pesky calls from Hamou trying to find out where that investigation stood.
And someone sent me a dossier on the Don Morton investigation. It turns out that Detective Sherry Daniels experienced the same thing. What was even funnier was that after the information Daniels provided was posted on some Anastasia website, Daniels said she started getting calls again from Hamou -- who was pretending to be someone else, just as she had done back during the Morton investigation. But Daniels said she still recognized the voice.
It's one of the Hamou patterns.
Like roving, recurrent cancer. Like constantly picking up the wrong checkbook by "accident". Like plastering her website with legal and pseudo-legal documents and "drafts" that contain only unproven allegations and then pretending they have some probative value.
It's all part of the con artist shtick.
Yep, Blake,
So is that "PROVE I'm not at the FBI!" bullcrap...
How about you just take ONE picture Oma Hamou INSIDE the FBI office and post it?? You don't mind all those other pictures of you from YEARS ago...
Hey Oma, how about YOU PROVE I'm not on my laptop outside the San Antonio Field Office of the FBI about to go inside. Go on. PROVE IT...
Snoopy-who-is-Oma posted:
"the document shows Bob's attorney lying in court by making the false claim there had been another lawsuit filed in Texas on behalf of Pallasart the web company Bob Atchison owns by his then CFO"
But, Oma. You yourself point out over and over that some of your default judgments were technically obtained against Enigma and not against you -- even though you were the only employee or officer of that company.
So how can you now claim Bob's attorney lied? He never said there had been any prior lawsuit between you and Bob -- and there had not been.
Nor did the attorney say anything about a lawsuit having actually been filed, which is the word you keep using when saying he perjured himself. The word "filed" is nowhere in the transcript you keep harping about.
The attorney simply referred to a prior lawsuit which Michael Edwards was, in fact, preparing but which was forestalled when he was finally paid for his web design work.
And I should point out that he was paid by you with an American Express number issued to David Davidson who says he never knew you had gotten a card in his name until he found himself sued by American Express. Although American Express honored the payment to Edwards, they actually ended up suing you for payment -- and that lawsuit was not only "filed", but actually resulted in a judgment against you.
But, of course, that judgment is still outstanding against you, as you never paid American Express. And never will.
So, you're laying again, as usual. And always will.
"Snoopy" has posted the usual blather. I know you think it takes care of things to simply deny them, but the fact is that the documents do not say what you are pretending they do. How do I know this? I read the documents. Now, there may in fact be documents that prove your points about Bob Atchison's lawyer's statements, but they are not the ones that you are posting, "Snoopy". As far as it being Triana's TRO, I didn't check the name of the judge who issued it. Was it Livingstone? There have been so many judges in Oma Hamou's life. The point is that you do not understand what a temporary restraining order is, "Snoopy". I have been told that Oma carries a copy with her and waves it at potential landlords as evidence she is being stalked. This past time with the Cowan rental she got her toe stubbed, because someone read it who wasd familiar with the procedure and the terminology. As Blake apparently is, as Rob apparently is, as Richard DiCastelis from our legal department is, as any lawyer or even law student would be. What exactly did you do at Advanced Legal Services, Oma? Make the coffee?
I was amused by your claim that Madame Sautov had investigated my donations and emailed Oma that they did not exist. Oma knows perfectly well that (1) that never happened and (2) Madame Sautov does not have access to the financial records. You should keep up with Pushkin, Oma. Things are not the same as they were the last time you were there years ago.
As for whether Oma Hamou believes that I contributed --- yeah. I really don't give a damn. I didn't contribute to annoy her. That's just a happy side effect. I contributed so that I could ask questions and get answers if I ever was in a position to need them. Guess what? I was, and I got the answers. Trust me, they weren't "revelations". The mention of her name evoked eye-rolling, laughter and a few minutes of derision. Period.
You aren't important at Pushkin, either.
Rebecca
Oma who is snoopy wrote:
"Furthermore, it is customary in any investigation for law enforcement to contact people"
EXACTLY! so why have we NEVER EVER heard from Law Enforcement?
Easy. because they AREN'T investigating.
I'm CERTAIN Oma Hamou has trotted down to the FBI office a few times driving THEM nuts too, like she did to Art Fortune, Det. Daniels, the lady at State...I'm certain they SAY "we're looking into it" because they fear (correctly) that OMA HAMOU IS A SOCIOPATH...and want to blow her off...
So NOW suddenly SIX YEARS LATER Oma Hamou is stalking the jurors in her trial and contacting them??
right. Snoopy will NEVER actually post those alleged emails...their in the same super secret, microscopic sized, file with all the other "communications" that never seem to appear over the years...
Typical CON ARTIST.
You picked up on the exact same jaw-dropper that I did, Rob. Yes, Oma, law enforcement does contact people if they are under investigation.
And you should certainly know.
RJ
Oh, and Oma. One cannot scan and post a conversation.
Anyway, Detective Daniels will be available to testify if needed, so no need for documents on our end.
But since you say you have a document (and you're always to quick to publish things you think support what you claim), why don't you just post it?
This way you can "prove" (snicker, snicker) your claims about Detective Daniels.
Oh, and Oma, the Agent on Duty in San Antonio has confirmed "We can't confirm or deny any investigation, however, trust me, if you WERE being investigated by the FBI, you would know it. We ALWAYS talk to the person investigated."
Thank God for WiFi so I can keep up with this fun!
So, prove I wasn't there.
Hilarious...
snoopy just said that THIS STATEMENT IS FALSE "Snoopy will NEVER actually post those alleged emails.."
ummm, don't you realize the ONLY WAY to make that statement FALSE is by POSTING THEM?!
Seriously, this is more fun than I've had in ages....I LOVE watching Oma melt down into a blithering jabberwocky. heheheheheheh
So, Oma. You are still insisting that Atchison's attorney testified that a prior lawsuit was filed in Texas between Hamou and Atchison -- and that the trial transcript bears that out.
Well, numbnuts. Every transcript has both page numbers and line numbers.
Direct us to the page and line where Atchison's attorney said a prior lawsuit had been filed in Texas between Hamou and Atchison.
If it's in the transcript, as you say, there will be a page number and a line number associated with the statement.
Give it to us.
Dear "Snoopy",
And by "Snoopy" I mean "Oma". Anyway.
Sweetheart, you might want to apply what tattered shreds of logic you can still wrap yourself in, and try and think this one through.
(1) You say that there is going to be a trial, and an examination of the events of the past few years that will take place in a legal setting. This will flow from the alleged F.B.I. investigation that you claim Oma Hamou has instigated against Bob Atchison.
(2) You claim that people like Detective Daniels will support Oma Hamou's version of events. Blake has been quite specific about conversations that he has had with Detective Daniels that do not support your position. If he is lying, this will be easily discovered. It could be easily discovered now by someone like, say, Michele Biernat, if she was to actually speak with Detective Daniels. I know, BFF, that would be stalking or something.
(3) You claim that two (unnamed) jurors would side with Oma were a miracle to happen and the case be retried (it would take a miracle, since it means the overturn of the legal system, but hell, stranger things have happened --- look at what the Supreme Court did to Al Gore in 2000). That leaves the other ten who presumably still think Oma is a crook. It also places the burden of proof upon Oma Hamou, and has been repeatedly demonstrated, the documents do not say what you think they do.
(4) You actually expect me to produce receipts for you governing my contributions? "Snoopy", you keep missing the point. I don't care if you think I made them or not. I did. It allowed me access to information at Pushkin when I was there that I might otherwise not have had. If there is one thing that I have learned from the hot mess that is Oma Hamou's life, it is that living one's life on the internet is not a good idea. If you think I am going to post records, try holding your breath until I do it. And don't stop holding it until I tell you I've done it. Remember, don't stop.
(5) You are flailing away at people like Eric Cowan and Hamid Refai, making cracks about Mrs. Batchelor and the Mortons, pulling the Russian Orthodox Church into it by first claiming that "someone" released private emails and then denying that the emails were authentic, expecting that the F.B.I., numerous hospitals, etc. will support your illusionary version of the last five years. Good luck with that, sister friend. I certainly would like to see you serve a subpoena on a Russian Orthodox prelate.
There are two possible conclusions. "Snoopy" is a moron, and Oma Hamou is a moron for allowing "Snoopy" to represent her public interests. Oh, wait. Both could be true.
Rebecca
Well, in a day (or week, or month) of stupid posts, Hamou might have just outdone herself.
Posting as "Sandman", she wrote:
"Bob Atchison and his then Attorney, L. Matthews took unfair advantage over the fact Hamou was not represented by counsel"
Since when is it taking "unfair advantage" to proceed against one's opponent in court just because she was too broke, stupid, or incompetent to have an attorney with her in court?
Did you think Atchison was not going to produce all the evidence the Rules of Evidence and the judge allowed him to use just because you couldn't get your sorry act together?
Or was this one of those cases where you stiffed your own lawyer for his fees and he wound up suing you instead of your opponent?
Or was this one of those cases where you were forced to proceed unprepared because you had worn out the judge's patience with your chronic claims of illness on every court date?
Since all this stuff (and lots more) happens to you, it's hard to keep track of which case was which.
Back from my drive...
Blake, Oma Hamou is playing her Con Artist trick again by saying "Bob and his lawyer took advantage that Oma wasn't represented by a lawyer"..
First, the ONLY REASON Oma Hamou did not HAVE a lawyer anymore was because she owed them TWENTY THOUSAND DOLLARS and gee, the greedy basturds kind of insisted on getting PAID to take her to trial...
THEN
THREE JUDGES. COUNT THEM THREE JUDGES ALL DENIED OMA'S MOTION TO CONTINUE THE TRIAL BECAUSE SHE DIDN'T HAVE A LAWYER.
Incuding Judge Triana, who told Oma Hamou in FRONT OF ME that it was SHE, Judge Triana, who was forcing Oma Hamou to go ahead and represent herself, because OMA had dragged the thing out for so long.
She denied Oma's last request for a Continuance. Oma has NO ONE to blame but herself,
However, her sociopathic view of the world just won't process this FACT.
More Con Artist LIES from Oma Hamou:
1. Yelonovsky never said what you claim he said. Go back and READ the document...
2. Judge LIVINGSTON DENIED the Boyce Brown Motion. She read it. Listened to him and DENIED IT. SHE was the one who said, in front of me, "Why is that woman never here in my Court? I've had enough of her dragging this out." OMA you can't say a word either way because YOU WERE NOT IN COURT that day for YOUR OWN MOTION.
3. JUDGE TRIANA looked Oma Hamou in the eye and told her she would NOT continue the Trial. Oma Hamou told the Judge "BUT I'm not prepared" and Judge Triana told her again "I am NOT continuing the trial." and gave her one hour to go to her hotel and get her documents...
JUDGE TRIANA DIDN'T CARE HOW ALLEGEDLY SICK OMA HAMOU WAS.
and the entire problem in which Oma Hamou found herself in that day at trial, being WITHOUT an attorney, was
BECAUSE OMA HAMOU OWED FOSTER, MALISH TWENTY THOUSAND DOLLARS AND SHE DID NOT PAY THEM AND THEY WITHDREW AS COUNSEL WITH PERMISSION OF JUDGE YELANOVSKY.
http://omahamoureport.org/Withdraw3.jpg
http://omahamoureport.org/Withdraw4.jpg
Dear "Snoopy",
Learn to read. I addressed you as the "person" who is publishing what you seem to think of as defences of Oma Hamou online. Why "she" allows "you" to do this is conjectural, but in the post in which you do the usual bait and switch ("I" did not do this, since "I" am not Oma Hamou), I was not saying you were. I was saying this is what you offered in her defence.
I am also sorry that you do not understand the English language, although given the way you write it was pretty much a foregone conclusion. You have no response to any of the statements other than profanity and the endless repetition of the phrase "libelous and defamatory" as though simply by writing it, it becomes magically true. That's interesting, because if "you" are indeed Oma, "you" are clearly sociopathic. If "you" are not, you are clearly nuts. Hobson's choice.
The "world" knows nothing of the sort about Bob Atchison (he is a liar, he is a con artist, he is a unicorn or whatever other bizarre appellation you wish to come up with there, "Snoopy". What the world does know, thanks to a tangled history of litigation, arrests and judgments, defaults and evictions, is that Oma Hamou is in fact a petty grifter who preys upon old men, treats those with who she has dealings with utter contempt (direct quote from Irina A. at Pushkin: "She thought we were fools"), was an unfit mother and a low-level con artist across Southern California. She made a desperate grab for the big time with the whole Enigma nonsense, but even that failed. If it had ever had a chance --- and I have seen no evidence that it did, from the image of Oma on the cover of Variety to emails in which she claims to be sensing the presence of a dead family blessing her work --- it was killed dead by her miserable taste, inordinate self-promotion, overweening ego and lack of talent. And before you scream about her great beauty, even the pictures you have posted of Oma in her photoshopped prime don't bear that out. I looked at her standing next to the priest one of you thought looked like Rasputin? If you thought that priest looked like Rasputin, then you probably think Oma is a beautiful woman. Rasputin had a beard; the priest had a beard. Women have lips, hair and breasts. Oma presumably has all three of those, although the hair needs some work. We've had ample opportunity to see the breasts thanks to "Snoopy", and they plainly have had some work. At any rate, the woman in the picture is not a great beauty. She looks like what she is, a middle-aged woman who is starting to sag. Honey, we all do, so live with it.
Since "you" claim that "she" does not read her own forum, "Snoopy", perhaps she doesn't know what kind of tool is posting for her. If you can honestly write with a straight face that you have not attacked Refai, Refai's lawyer, Cowan, Cowan's girlfriend, Mrs. Batchelor and Mrs. Batchelor's son, and anyone else who has had dealings with you that have not "worked out" (to put it mildly), you need your head examined.
Which you manifestly do.
Rebecca Jordan
But that's the point, "Snoopy"; you don't prove anything. As Blake has demonstrated, you don't know how to read the documents in the cases; you don't understand the meaning of the legal language used in a courtroom; and you simply offer your unsupported word that what you say is true.
May I ask you a personal question? You don't have to answer, but what level of education have you achieved? High school? College? Graduate work? I realize that this probably sounds elitist to someone of your limited gifts, but at some point you missed classes in elementary rhetoric (look it up), to say nothing of logic.
As I said, you don't have to answer and probably won't. That's alright, "Snoopy". The answer to the question is revealed every time you post.
RJ
It is an interesting, and rather important point, that having spent a while Googling "Bob Atchison" and "Rob Moshein", the only NEGATIVE things I could find on the web and blogs, ALL COME FROM OMA HAMOU.
Just where is "the whole world" saying these things? In super secret hidden forums that only Oma can access?
I found lots of Universities saying good things about Bob and the Alexander Palace site. I found Business magazines saying really good things about Bob when he was with Apple computers. I saw a good story about Bob developing "Flifo" which is now called "Travelocity.com"
Nice things about me and my wine stuff...
but, NOT ONE NEGATIVE WORD out there that isn't written by Oma Hamou, snoopy or "sandman"....
By the way, RJ, BEAUTIFULLY written. Brava.
Snoopy-who-is-Oma posted:
"Page 91 Line 17"
This was in response to my request that she point out the line in the transcript where anything was said about an earlier lawsuit having been "filed" in Texas, which is what Hamou was previously claiming.
The problem is that the word "filed" is nowhere on that line -- or anywhere else, for that matter, when the earlier lawsuit in Texas is being discussed.
On an earlier line, Atchison's lawyer did mention that Hamou filed a lawsuit in California. And she did.
But he never said an earlier lawsuit was filed in Texas. He only referred to a "prior lawsuit" in a matter which was settled, which was a reference to a lawsuit that was being prepared by Michael Edwards and then dropped when Hamou finally paid him (albeit with someone else's credit card).
Honestly, Rebecca. The woman really cannot read.
Also, Oma. The reason judges want both parties in court during proceedings is so that opposing litigants can challenge or correct what they think are misstatements by the other parties.
Given your history of failing to show up for court, claiming illnesses over and over and over, default judgments, arrest warrants for failing to appear, you are the last person on earth who has any right to complain about being blind-sided by anything the other party says in court.
Of course, we know your game here. If you actually show up for court -- and were actually prepared -- you would be nailed by the evidence against you. It's much better when running future cons to claim you were mishandled by the court system when you weren't present to present the true (snicker, snicker) story. And to assure everyone that had you only been there, things would have gone differently (snicker, snicker).
Of course, you get nailed, anyway. That's why you have a dozen and a half judgments against you.
So maybe you're right. Why bother to show up? You're going to lose either way and have no money to pay the judgment (unless a recent scam has borne fruit, such as L'Affaire Refai).
Snoopy-who-is-Oma posted:
"I was told this morning the state of Texas has contacted my friend, Oma Hamou regarding her Bill of Review against Bob Atchison and seems Rob Moshein and Bob Atchison's bullying antics on the web and their posts about this Bill of Review were just that "threats" because the courts can still hear Oma's legal pleadings and decide whether Bob aka Blake committed fraud, forgery and perjury at trial. Now that's the best news I have heard all week!!!!"
Well, well. It seems that Hamou got the standard letter the clerk issues when one year has elapsed after no action has been taken on a filing.
Yep, folks. It's actually been over a year since she made that absurd filing in the final minutes before the deadline hit. Which means it's been well over a year since she's been saying that Bill of Review was imminent ...... coming just any old minute ...... having the final flourishes put on it by her lawyers ...... just waiting to retrieve a few more documents ...... just any moment now.
But here's the real question, Oma.
You've been insisting for years that the court will hear a Bill of Review you file, even though you don't meet any of the criteria to get an actual hearing on the merits. See. You're just that special.
So why are you now crowing about some communique from the court that supposedly says only what you have been claiming all along?
By the way, we're looking forward to the filing so that the abuse of process action can be launched against you.
So please don't delay. Why wait until the end of next week? Do it first thing Monday morning.
Surely you have all the background work done by now, since you've been promising for several years now that this action is right of the verge of going down.
Or, after accidentally helping you to sue yourself, have you had to replace your lawyers and start all over with a new team?
Oh, yeah. Be sure to send them a good check. That bum check you mailed the court in the Cowan case was really bad form. Even for you.
I doubt the Court "contacted" Oma Hamou to "tell her they can still hear the Bill of Review". I agree that they most likely sent her a letter saying the thing was automatically dismissed for lack of anything happening for over 12 months, which did elapse October 6, 2010.
Texas Rule of Judicial Administration requires a TRIAL or other final disposition within 12 months. Further, the Texas courts have the independent authority to dismisss under TRCP 165(a) for a plaintiff's failure to prosecute their case with "diligence". The local Rule for District Court is that they AUTOMATICALLY dismiss ANY CASE filed when nothing has happened for 12 months, under this rule.
I'll make sure to double check Monday Morning when the court opens up for business.
If not, Bob will make a special appearance to have it dismissed...
OR maybe, better to LET Oma actually do something so Bob can haul her in for that Debtor's Exam...
new blog go there.
Too many comments already.
Post a Comment